Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Basiliximab”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources
PubMed2007

Review article: steroid resistance in inflammatory bowel disease - mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.

BACKGROUND: Steroid resistance in inflammatory bowel disease presents a difficult clinical challenge. The advent of biological therapies coupled with an increasing understanding of the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease has provided new therapeutic options. METHODS: We review the available literature of the mechanisms behind steroid resistance. In addition, we outline some of the options available for treating those patients who fail to respond adequately to glucocorticoids. RESULTS: Approximately 30% of patients prescribed glucocorticoids will not achieve clinical remission. Many such patients are offered immunosuppressive or, recently, biological agents. However, these agents are ineffective in a large proportion of patients. Immunosuppressive agents only bring 40-60% of patients into remission, and biological agents typically induce remission in just 40% of patients. In this review, the possible explanations for glucocorticoid resistance are discussed. Recent evidence suggests that in many patients it is mediated by interleukin-2. Basiliximab, a biological agent that interrupts interleukin-2 signalling, has shown significant benefit in early clinical studies. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who fail to respond to steroid therapy should have alternative agents introduced in a timely fashion. Steroid refractory inflammatory bowel disease remains a difficult condition to treat, but new therapies and managements are emerging.

Biological Therapy↗
PubMed2004

Different clinicopathological courses of two recipients of kidneys retrieved from the same non-heart beating donor.

We report the clinicopathological courses of two recipients of kidneys retrieved from the same non-heart beating donor (NHBD). A 52-year-old man received a renal transplant from an NHBD. The donor was a 66-year-old woman who died of subarachnoid haemorrhage. The recipient was immunosuppressed by basiliximab, tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), methyl prednisolone (MP), and antilymphocyte globulin (ALG). On post-operative day (POD) 21, haemodialysis therapy was withdrawn, however, their serum creatinine (s-Cr) level failed to improve. Four transplant biopsies were performed (1 h and POD 46, 74, and 114). The biopsy showed tubular degeneration but no evidence of TAC nephrotoxicity. The last biopsy after discontinuation of TAC demonstrated acute rejection of borderline grade. The s-Cr level at discharge was 5.0 mg/dL. The contra-lateral kidney was transplanted into a 31-year-old female and showed early functioning, with an s-Cr level at discharge of 1.8 mg/dL. Biopsy examination on POD 38 showed a recovery of tubular degeneration. The causes of delayed graft function and persistently high level of s-Cr in Case 1 remain unclear. Various factors, including donor-related factors, recipient-related factors, TAC nephrotoxicity, acute rejection, and urinary tract infection could all be associated with this condition.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Induction therapy with either anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies or rabbit antithymocyte globulins in liver transplantation for hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related end-stage liver disease (ESLD) is the leading cause for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of our sequential study was to assess the safety and efficacy of induction therapy using either rabbit antithymocyte globulins (RATG) or anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies. METHODS: From January 2000 to January 2003, 31 patients underwent OLT for HCV-related ESLD, and survived more than 1 month post-transplantation. Up to July 2001, induction relied on RATG (Thymoglobulins; Sangstat, Lyon, France) which was given for a median of 5 d, i.e. a total dose of 406 +/- 45 mg (n = 16; group I). Thereafter, induction was based on either basiliximab or dacluzimab (n = 15; group II). Steroids and tacrolimus (from day 1 onwards) were given as maintenance therapy. The primary end-points were at 6 months post-transplantation. RESULTS: Patient and graft survivals were excellent and similar in both groups. The acute rejection rate was 37.5% in group I and 20% in group II (p = ns). The rates of serious bacterial and fungal infections as well as cytomegalovirus infections were similar in both groups. Even if the overall pattern of post-transplant liver enzymes did not differ between the two groups, the rate of HCV recurrence tended to be higher in group II (80%) compared with group I (56.25%; p = ns) patients. Both induction therapies were clinically and biologically well tolerated. CONCLUSION: RATG induction therapy is as efficient and as safe as induction with anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Positive pre-transplant flow-panel reactive antibody detected after accelerated acute rejection with negative pre-transplant flow crossmatch.

A 30-yr-old woman underwent kidney transplantation from a flow cytometric lymphocyte crossmatch-negative donor. Immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, basiliximab and three days of steroid. On day 5 post-transplant, she developed acute rejection and underwent anti-rejection therapy consisting of steroid pulse and deoxyspurgualin. Retrospective analyses of anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody revealed high flow panel reactive antibody (PRA) in the pre-transplant serum without donor specific antibody (DSA) and positive DSA at the time of rejection. Anti-rejection therapy was successful in treating cellular rejection but her graft function further deteriorated after three months post-transplant and graft biopsy revealed chronic allograft nephropathy with positive staining for C4d in peritubular capillary, suggesting the presence of chronic antibody-mediated rejection. Pre-transplant positive flow PRA without DSA may also be a risk for acute and chronic rejection.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Better renal function with enhanced immunosuppression and protocol biopsies after kidney transplantation in children.

Subclinical rejection may be associated with decreased graft function after renal transplantation (Tx). Detection by protocol biopsies and treatment could thus be important for the long-term prognosis. We have earlier discovered that glomerular filtration rate (GFR) declined in young children during the first 18 months. Consequently, we slightly enhanced and individualized each patient's immunosuppression. This was a retrospective study of 59 pediatric renal Tx patients between 1995 and 2001. The 35 historical controls received triple-therapy of azathioprine, methylprednisolone and cyclosporine. GFR was measured by protocol at discharge, 6 and 18 months, and a core biopsy was obtained at 18 months. The 24 study patients in addition received basiliximab, had GFR measured at 3 and 12 months, and a biopsy taken at 3 months. Based on histology and function, immunosuppression was individually adjusted. The groups were compared for GFR and histology at 18 months after Tx. There were less acute rejection episodes in the study group (0.38 vs. 1.23 per patient) and serum creatinine concentrations were lower. Subclinical rejection was detected and treated in 39% at 3 months. There were more chronic changes in the control (47%) than in the study group (29%) at 18 months. GFR was significantly higher in the study group at 18 months (87 vs. 68 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), most remarkably in patients < or =2 yr of age (99 vs. 68 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Detection of subclinical rejection and slightly enhanced and individualized immunosuppression improved GFR 18 months after renal Tx, especially in the youngest patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2007

Successful treatment of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis after kidney transplantation by plasmapheresis and rituximab.

A 22-year-old patient whose primary kidney disease was focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) developed severe recurrence of proteinuria (up to 57 g/24 h) immediately after a haploidentic living donor kidney transplantation despite pre-operative plasmapheresis. The immunosuppressive treatment consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, basiliximab and steroids. He underwent 10 plasmapheresis sessions in the first 3-week post-transplantation. In addition, he received 2 i.v. doses of rituximab (RTX) 600 mg (375 mg/m(2)) on days 7 and 15. Proteinuria decreased below nephrotic range at day 14 and serum creatinine returned progressively to normal values. A short course of oral ciclophosphamide (100 mg/j) was administrated between days 22 and 40 and three additional plasmapheresis sessions on days 34, 39 and 49. This strategy allowed obtaining sustained full remission of the nephrotic syndrome (NS) and excellent graft function, which persists over 2 years after transplantation. No notable adverse events related to RTX or plasmapheresis were observed. This case suggests that RTX associated with plasmapheresis may be an effective treatment of recurrent NS because of FSGS.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Safety and success of kidney transplantation and concomitant immunosuppression in HIV-positive patients.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus-associated nephropathy (HIVAN) has become the third leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in African Americans, and is expected to grow exponentially. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has significantly prolonged the survival of patients with HIV infection. Despite the growing number of HIV-positive dialysis patients with prolonged life expectancy, kidney transplantation with immunosuppression has been declined because it is considered a waste of scarce donor kidneys due to potential increases in morbidity and mortality. METHODS: The institutional review board of Drexel University College of Medicine and Hahnemann University Hospital approved this prospective study. The aim was to find out safety and success of kidney transplantation, and the effect of immunosuppression on HIV infection. Forty HIV-positive dialysis patients received kidney transplantation between February 2001 and January 2004. Patient inclusion criteria were maintenance of HAART, plasma HIV-1 RNA of <400 copies/mL, absolute CD4 counts of 200 cells/muL or more. Immunosuppression was basiliximab induction and maintenance with cyclosporine, sirolimus, and steroids. HAART was continued post-transplant. Acute rejections were diagnosed by biopsy and treated with methylprednisolone. Surveillance biopsies were completed at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months, and evaluated for subclinical acute rejection, chronic allograft nephropathy, and HIVAN. RESULTS: One- and 2-year actuarial patient survival was 85% and 82%, respectively, and graft survival was 75% and 71%, respectively. Plasma HIV-1 RNA remained undetectable, and CD4 counts remained in excess of 400 cells per muL with no evidence of AIDS for up to 2 years. CONCLUSION: One- and 2-year graft survival is comparable to other high-risk populations receiving kidney transplantation. One- and 2-year patient survival is higher than HIV patients maintained on dialysis. Immunosuppression does not adversely affect HIV recipients maintained on HAART in the short term.

AIDS-Associated Nephropathy↗
PubMed2004

Everolimus with optimized cyclosporine dosing in renal transplant recipients: 6-month safety and efficacy results of two randomized studies.

Two prospective, randomized studies evaluated everolimus 1.5 vs. 3 mg/day with steroids and low-exposure cyclosporine (CsA) (C2 monitoring) in de novo renal transplant patients. Everolimus dosing was adjusted to maintain a minimum trough level of 3 ng/mL. Study 1 (A2306; n=237) had no induction therapy; in Study 2 (A2307; n=256) basiliximab was administered (Days 0 and 4). The primary endpoint was renal function at 6 months. CsA C2 target levels, initially 1200 ng/mL in Study 1 and 600 ng/mL in Study 2, were tapered over time post-transplant. Median creatinine levels in Study 1 were 133 and 132 micromol/L at 6 months in the 1.5 and 3 mg/day groups, respectively, and 130 micromol/L in both groups in Study 2. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) occurred in 25.0% and 15.2% of patients in the 1.5 and 3 mg/day groups in Study 1, and 13.7% and 15.1% in Study 2. Incidence of BPAR was significantly higher in patients with an everolimus trough <3 ng/mL. There were no significant between-group differences in the composite endpoint of BPAR, graft loss or death, nor any significant between-group differences in adverse events in either study. Concentration-controlled everolimus with low-exposure CsA provided effective protection against rejection with good renal function.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

De novo kidney transplantation without use of calcineurin inhibitors preserves renal structure and function at two years.

We performed a randomized prospective trial comparing calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free to CNI-based immunosuppression to determine the impact on renal function, structure and gene expression. Sixty-one kidney recipients treated with basiliximab mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisone (P) were randomly assigned to concentration-controlled sirolimus or cyclosporine. Two years post-transplant 55 patients underwent renal function studies, 48 (87%) underwent transplant biopsies; all classified by Banff scoring and 41 by DNA microarrays. Comparing sirolimus/MMF/P to cyclosporine/MMF/P there was a significantly lower serum creatinine (1.35 vs. 1.81 mg/dL; p = 0.008), higher Cockroft-Gault glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (80.4 vs. 63.4 mL/min; p = 0.008), iothalamate GFR (60.6 vs. 49.2 mL/min; p = 0.018) and Banff 0 (normal) biopsies (66.6 vs. 20.8%; p = 0.013). Regression analysis of calculated GFRs from 1 to 36 months yielded a positive slope for sirolimus of 3.36 mL/min/year, and a negative slope for cyclosporine of -1.58 mL/min/year (p = 0.008). Gene expression profiles from kidneys with higher Banff chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) scores confirmed significant up-regulation of genes responsible for immune/inflammation and fibrosis/tissue remodeling. At 2 years the sirolimus-treated recipients have better renal function, a diminished prevalence of CAN and down-regulated expression of genes responsible for progression of CAN. All may provide for an alternative natural history with improved graft survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Mycoplasma hominis septic arthritis in a pediatric renal transplant recipient: case report and review of the literature.

Septic arthritis (SA) typically occurs in young children, often from Staphylococcus. With chronic immunosuppression, however, pathogens may be atypical. A 15-year-old African-American female developed Mycoplasma hominis SA in her right hip 2 months following cadaveric renal transplant (Tx). Her presentation was subtle and indolent, without fever or leukocytosis. Although reported in adult Tx recipients, M. hominis infections have not been described in pediatric recipients. Early immunosuppression (basiliximab, prednisone, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and Thymoglobulin) may have increased her susceptibility to M. hominis. Optimal therapy for M. hominis SA is not well established and relapses occur. This patient underwent joint incision and drainage, treatment for 8 weeks with doxycycline and levofloxacin guided by in vitro sensitivities, and a reduction in immunosuppression. She has been free of ongoing infection for 3 years with stable graft function (Cr 1.1 mg/dL) on moderate immunosuppression with prednisone, tacrolimus and MMF.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Avoidance of chronic steroid therapy in african american kidney transplant recipients monitored by surveillance biopsy: 1-year results.

African American (AA) kidney recipients receive chronic steroid therapy to improve outcomes, despite their high susceptibility to side effects, particularly diabetes and hypertension. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of avoidance of chronic steroid therapy in AA compared to non-AA kidney recipients. Two hundred and six kidney recipients were studied; 103 AA recipients versus 103 non-AA recipients. Induction was basiliximab and maintenance was a calcineurin inhibitor plus mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Surveillance biopsies were preformed at 1, 6 and 12 months to assess subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (AR) and SCAR were treated by methylprednisolone. The primary end point was AR. Secondary end points were graft function, 1-year patient and graft survival. AR was observed in 16% of AA and 13% of non-AA recipients. SCAR at 1 month was significantly higher in the AA group (p=0.04). One-year actual patient and graft survival in the AA group was 96% and 88% and in the non-AA group 97% and 89%, respectively. Avoidance of chronic steroid therapy directed by surveillance biopsies provides equivalent AR, CAN and 1-year patient and graft survival in AA versus non-AA recipients and a 5% incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus. All recipients remain free of chronic steroid therapy. Longer-term follow-up is ongoing.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Nodular B-cell aggregates associated with treatment refractory renal transplant rejection resolved by rituximab.

Acute rejection episodes leading to treatment refractory early graft loss are increasingly rare events in living related renal transplantation today. Pathophysiologic pathways often remain unsolved. We report on tubulointerstitial and vascular rejection developing within 2 weeks after transplantation in a 12-year-old boy treated with cyclosporine, mycophenolate, steroids and double blinded basiliximab. Despite steroid pulses, switch to tacrolimus and ATG serum creatinine peaked at 347 micromol/L with imminent graft loss and ongoing C4d negative cellular vascular rejection. Permanent gain of function was only achieved after a single dose of rituximab. Retrospectively CD20+ nodular B-cell aggregates could be demonstrated in all three biopsies obtained prior to rituximab and resolved concomitantly with functional improvement. Our case for the first time demonstrates resolution of nodular CD20+ infiltrates and decline of OX40, NF-kappaB and CTL transcription shortly after rituximab indicating a B-cell facilitated C4d negative pathway. Single dose rituximab may effectively reverse even long-lasting refractory rejection.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2003

Interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies in renal transplantation: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies on acute rejection episodes, graft loss, deaths, and rate of infection and malignancy in patients with renal transplants. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of published data. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library for years 1996-2003 plus search of medical editors' trial amnesty and contact with manufacturers of the antibodies. SELECTION OF STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials comparing interleukin-2 receptor antibodies with placebo or no additional treatment in patients with renal transplants receiving ciclosporin based immunosuppression. RESULTS: Eight randomised controlled trials involving 1871 patients met the selection criteria (although only 1858 patients were analysed). Interleukin-2 receptor antibodies significantly reduced the risk of acute rejection (odds ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 0.63). There were no significant differences in the rate of graft loss (0.78, 0.58 to 1.04), mortality (0.75, 0.46 to 1.23), overall incidence of infections (0.97, 0.77 to 1.24), incidence of cytomegalovirus infections (0.81, 0.62 to 1.04), or risk of malignancies at one year (0.82, 0.39 to 1.70). The different antibodies had a similar sized effect on acute rejection (test for heterogeneity P=0.7): anti-Tac (0.37, 0.16 to 0.89), BT563 (0.37, 0.1 to 1.38), basiliximab (0.56, 0.44 to 0.72), and daclizumab (0.46, 0.32 to 0.67). The reduction in acute rejections was similar for all ciclosporin based immunosuppression regimens (test for heterogeneity P=1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Adding interleukin-2 receptor antibodies to ciclosporin based immunosuppression reduces episodes of acute rejection at six months by 49%. There is no evidence of an increased risk of infective complications. Longer follow up studies are needed to confirm whether interleukin-2 receptor antibodies improve long term graft and patient survival.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Improved solitary pancreas transplant graft survival in the modern immunosuppressive era.

The results of solitary pancreas (SP) transplantation have traditionally lagged behind those of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. This is one of the chief factors that has limited the wide-scale application of SP transplantation in nonuremic type I diabetic patients. The purpose of this study is to report our present experience with SP transplantation and compare it to a prior experience. Twenty-three SP transplants (14 PAK, 4 PTA, and 5 PASPK) performed since January 1997 were compared to 56 SP transplants (53 PAK, 1 PTA, and 2 PASPK) performed before 1994. Between 1993 and 1997, SP transplants were not performed because of high morbidity in the early experience. Early SP transplants were performed using bladder drainage of exocrine secretions, and enteric drainage without a Roux-en-Y was used in the recent series. In the early era, immunosuppressive therapy included cyclosporine (CsA), azathioprine (AZA), corticosteroids, and in half of the patients, ALG or OKT3. Recent SP transplants received tacrolimus (TAC). mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), corticosteroids, and induction with either anti-thymocyte globulin (n = 9), OKT3 (n = 1), daclizumab (n = 5), or basiliximab (n = 8). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier patient survival was 85% in the early era and 100% in the recent group of patients (p = 0.08). In the previous era, four patients suffered significant decrement in renal function, necessitating dialysis or kidney transplantation following pancreas transplantation. All patients transplanted since 1997 maintain near prepancreas transplant levels of renal function (mean pretransplant serum creatinine (Cr) 1.3 +/- 0.3 mg/dl vs, mean current Cr 1.4 +/- 0.4 mg/dl, p = NS]. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier graft survival (insulin independence) of recent SP transplants was 87%, whereas for prior SP transplants it was 19% (p = 0.0001). The rate of acute pancreas rejection was significantly different between the two groups. Of early SP transplants, 76% experienced at least one rejection episode within the first year. In contrast, 35% of recent SP transplants suffered acute rejection during the same time period (p = 0.04). Current experience with SP transplantation demonstrates improved graft survival and reduced rejection rates with the use of newer immunosuppressive agents.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Reducing adverse effects of immunosuppressive agents in kidney transplant recipients.

Success in solid organ transplantation with minimal complications can now be achieved for most patients, and a remarkable rate of graft and patient survival can also be expected. However, the potential for adverse events and comorbid conditions increases with longer graft survival. Although the immunosuppressive regimen is central to the outcome of the transplant recipient and directly impacts the survival of the graft, chronic use of immunosuppressive agents is associated with metabolic disturbances such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, loss of bone density, nephrotoxicity, and diabetes, which may contribute to other comorbid conditions. In addition, changes in appearance, gingival hyperplasia, hirsutism, alopecia, and weight gain disrupt quality of life and may lead to noncompliance with the immunosuppressive regimen. New immunosuppressive medications, including mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, basiliximab, and daclizumab, have allowed for experimentation with new regimens designed to reduce or allow discontinuation of corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors. This review highlights the impact and cost of immunosuppressive side effects and the potential for new immunosuppressive regimens to reduce this substantial clinical burden in transplantation.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗
PubMed2024

Network proximity analysis as a theoretical model for identifying potential novel therapies in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) is a progressive cholestatic liver disease with no licensed therapies. Previous Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) have identified genes that correlate significantly with PSC, and these were identified by systematic review. Here we use novel Network Proximity Analysis (NPA) methods to identify already licensed candidate drugs that may have an effect on the genetically coded aspects of PSC pathophysiology.Over 2000 agents were identified as significantly linked to genes implicated in PSC by this method. The most significant results include previously researched agents such as metronidazole, as well as biological agents such as basiliximab, abatacept and belatacept. This in silico analysis could potentially serve as a basis for developing novel clinical trials in this rare disease.

Cholangitis, Sclerosing↗
PubMed2001

New developments in the prophylaxis and treatment of graft versus host disease.

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) remains the major obstacle to successful allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Cyclosporin with methotrexate is the most common prophylactic regimen. Tacrolimus is associated with less GVHD and is gaining ground especially in unrelated donor transplants where current regimens are unsatisfactory. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rapamycin have not yet shown benefit in acute GVHD prophylaxis. In vivo T-cell depletion with Campath 1H or thymoglobulin used during transplant conditioning are increasingly used in place of ex vivo T-cell depletion, where results remain disappointing. Steroids remain first choice for therapy of GVHD but anti-CD25 antibodies, daclizumab or basiliximab are gaining popularity as second-line therapy ahead of ATG. Chronic GVHD is increasing with greater use of peripheral blood stem cell grafts and older patients. The combination of tacrolimus and MMF is promising for patients with extensive disease. Tolerance induction using CTLA-4-Ig, anti-CD40L, tresperimus and/or rapamycin may revolutionise GVHD therapy. However, due to the desirability of tumour intolerance, tolerance is likely to be developed in organ transplantation before bone marrow transplantation for traditional indications. Bone marrow transplants performed to induce organ tolerance may see increasing use of these agents. TNF blockade using infliximab or etanercept (Enbrel) is promising but the role of these agents is not yet defined.

Abatacept↗
PubMed2003

Immunosuppressants in advanced clinical development for organ transplantation and selected autoimmune diseases.

Immunosuppressants dampen the immune response or restore balance among immune system components. They are primarily used to prevent allograft rejection after organ transplantation and to prevent or treat disease flares in autoimmune diseases. Immunosuppressants available at present include the calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporin, tacrolimus), antimetabolites (azathioprine, leflunomide, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil), antiproliferatives (sirolimus), monoclonal antibodies to T lymphocyte (basiliximab, daclizumab, muromonab-CD3) and anticytokines (anakinra, etanercept, infliximab). The immunosuppressive market grows at a rate of > 10% yearly, with total sales in 2001 of US$2.7 billion. Immunotherapy in transplantation and autoimmune diseases is tending towards the use of multi-drug regimens tailored for the individual patient. At least 23 new immunosuppressants are currently in advanced clinical testing or preregistration, and can be divided into three groups. First, emerging drugs targeting intracellular ligands in immune cells are primarily analogues of currently-marketed agents, which attempt to provide improved pharmaceutical or safety profiles compared with the prototype compound. They are largely being developed in organ transplantation. Second, emerging drugs targeting cell surface ligands on immune cells attempt to antagonise novel molecular sites to interfere with immune cell activation via costimulatory signals, immune cell adhesion to tissues or the vasculature and immune cell trafficking. These agents are being primarily developed in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and/or multiple sclerosis. Finally, emerging drugs acting as anticytokines, which largely follow on from the success of those on the market, by antagonising the function of tumour necrosis factor or a narrow selection of interleukins. All are being assessed in rheumatoid arthritis. Drug development of immunosuppressants is increasingly attempting to intervene in disease progression over the long term. These efforts bring with them trial design and regulatory issues, such as what markers can be used as trial outcome measures, over what duration do trials need to be conducted and what labelling claims are allowed. With the intensive activity in this field, it is likely that several new drugs will reach the market in the coming decade. One caveat, however, is that emerging immunosuppressants that are likely to capture a reasonable share of this increasingly-fragmented market must demonstrate the ability to achieve disease remission or long-term slowing of disease progression.

Animals↗