Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “thematic analysis methods”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2026

Qualitative evidence of service user experiences and perspectives on long-acting injectable buprenorphine for opioid treatment - a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: There is substantial literature on opioid treatment program (OTP) formulations and how they relate to the pharmacotherapy service user experience. As a newer formulation, less is known about service user experiences of long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAIB). The aim of this scoping review is to map the qualitative evidence and gaps in the literature on service user experiences and perspectives of LAIB. METHODS: Our search strategy included Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus and Web Science, and citation chaining, from January 2016 to June 2025. Studies were included if reporting qualitative descriptions of LAIB service user experiences of treatment for opioid dependence, inclusive of qualitative, mixed methods (description of qualitative data only), case reports and English language. Articles were screened by two reviewers. A living experience first author led the analysis using inductive coding and thematic analysis, to produce a descriptive summary of synthesised findings alongside key study characteristics and quality appraisal, adhering to the Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. RESULTS: After screening 838 titles/abstracts and reviewing 150 full texts, 40 studies met the eligibility criteria. All were conducted in high income countries, principally the US (n=12); Australia (n=10); and England and Wales (n=9). We identified five themes: Navigating LAIB treatment; Embodied and relational effects of LAIB; Impact and role of the service provider; Narratives of harm reduction and recovery; Stigma and criminalisation. LAIB was commonly experienced as increasing convenience, stability and freedom from daily supervised dosing, enabling improved work, travel, privacy and social participation. Reduced clinic/dosing contact often lessened enacted stigma and treatment burden. However, experiences were heterogenous. Some participants described injection-site discomfort, uncertainty about dose adequacy, reduced flexibility once injected, and ambivalence about LAIB effects. There was inconsistency in LAIB service user reports on service connection, isolation and psychosocial support. Treatment experiences were strongly shaped by provider practices. CONCLUSIONS: Findings underscore the need for integrated, flexible, harm-reduction oriented and person-centred LAIB treatment models that prioritise choice, autonomy and therapeutic relationships to maximise benefit for service users. However, evidence of LAIB service user experiences is concentrated in high-income countries, and the absence of perspectives from low- and middle-income country settings represents a substantial gap in the evidence base.

LAIB↗
PubMed2026

Social Isolation and Loneliness Among Older Asian Immigrants Through the Lens of Sense of Coherence: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.

AIM: To explore the meaning older Asian immigrants attribute to social isolation and loneliness, their management strategies, utilisation of resources and impact on health. DESIGN: Systematic review of qualitative studies. DATA SOURCES: AgeLine, CINAHL, MEDLINE, ProQuest, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched in September 2024. METHODS: Inclusion criteria: participants were Asian immigrants to Western countries aged 65 and over, community-living and experiencing social isolation and loneliness. Antonovsky's Sense of Coherence was used to frame the thematic analysis. RESULTS: Ten papers were included and analysed deductively using elements of the sense of coherence framework: • Comprehensibility: Social isolation and loneliness are viewed as multifaceted, influenced by cultural and environmental dislocation, language barriers, intergenerational conflicts, deteriorating health and mobility, and socioeconomic challenges. • Manageability: included engaging in culture-specific community programs, family and ethnic community support and living within ethnic enclaves mitigated isolation and loneliness. • Meaningfulness: Strong family ties, active community involvement, spirituality, volunteerism, and cultural practices fostered resilience. However, accepting the changing values of their new world, living independently, and carving their own niche provided meaning to their transformed reality. CONCLUSION: Older Asian immigrants experience social isolation and loneliness through a cultural lens, shaped by migration experiences, language barriers, and shifting family dynamics. Cultural roots, family ties, spirituality, community, acceptance, and independence enhance sense of coherence. Recognising the dynamic interplay between cultural identity, resilience, and adaptation is key to understanding their lived experience. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: This review informs culturally sensitive interventions, guiding healthcare, community services, and policy to support social participation, mitigate loneliness through ethno-specific activities, and improve the quality of life for aging immigrant populations in Western countries. REPORTING METHOD: The review was undertaken and reported using the PRISMA guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: None. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42023425752).

Humans↗
PubMed2026

A Systematic Review of Lived Experiences of Receiving a Diagnosis of ADHD in Adulthood.

OBJECTIVE: With rising numbers of adults seeking and receiving ADHD diagnoses, understanding their first-hand experiences of the diagnostic process is key for sensitive support and service design. This systematic review collates, evaluates and synthesises the existing evidence-base on lived experiences of adult ADHD diagnosis. METHOD: Keyword searches of six databases generated 10,357 citations, which were subjected to a systematic screening process that identified 21 relevant studies. Findings were analysed using thematic synthesis. RESULTS: Analysis generated three overarching themes, elaborating how diagnostic experiences are shaped by adults' Relationship with Self, Relationship with Others, and Relationship with Systems. Personally, diagnosis was widely experienced as a pivotal identity event, triggering biographical reflection that could foster greater self-compassion, but also grief, anger and identity confusion. Socially, diagnosis facilitated interpersonal understanding and communication, but also exposed adults to stigma and introduced dilemmas about diagnostic disclosure. Systemically, adults experienced the diagnostic process as beset by barriers and delays, and reported highly variable access to post-diagnosis supports or treatment. CONCLUSION: Results suggest receiving an ADHD diagnosis in adulthood is a complex relational process that can be both validating and destabilising, with variation in experiences resulting from individual biographies, interpersonal resources, stigma climates, and service structures.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

The psychosocial supports and interventions accessed by family members of patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies: A systematic review.

AIM: Family members of patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) face profound emotional, social and practical challenges, yet little is known about how they access psychosocial support. We synthesised the literature on the psychosocial support accessed by family members of patients with DEEs, including evidence-based interventions. METHOD: Four databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data, appraised study quality (QualSyst Tool), and determined certainty of evidence (GRADE-CERQual Framework). Data were synthesised using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: 28 papers comprising 27 unique studies were included and methodological quality was high overall (median = 0.91, IQR = 0.85-1.00). Most studies focused on parent experiences; only two included siblings' perspectives. Families reported high psychological needs which were rarely met by psychological support. Clinicians rarely provided adequate information, quality communication or addressed mental health. Families valued respite care, but experienced barriers to access. Peer support was the most common and valued resource. Three studies tested interventions and appeared feasible and acceptable for parents. However, evidence for intervention effectiveness is preliminary and limited to small, uncontrolled pilot studies. INTERPRETATION: Gaps exist in psychosocial support provision for families of patients with DEEs, including insufficient research on siblings' and grandparents' needs, and lack of evidence-based interventions. We propose evidence-informed research and implementation strategies to address these gaps.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Effectiveness and usability of artificial intelligence-powered assistive technologies in Supporting daily activities of children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral Palsy (CP) is the main cause of motor disabilities in childhood, necessitating innovative approaches to rehabilitation and assistive technology (AT). Simultaneously, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into devices to create more adaptive, personalized, and effective AT. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and usability of AI-powered assistive technologies designed to support daily activities and rehabilitation in children with CP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and IEEE Xplore, were systematically searched, and 23 articles were included in the final analysis. Articles were identified, selected, and categorized into emerging thematic areas based on the primary function and application of the technology. RESULTS: Five key thematic topics were identified: 1) AI-driven motor rehabilitation and gait training for functional mobility; 2) intelligent assessment and monitoring systems for clinical decision support; 3) AI-supported communication, social interaction, and intention recognition tools; 4) gamified and virtual reality-based interventions to enhance engagement and usability; and 5) smart assistive systems supporting daily living and independent mobility. The findings demonstrate a strong trend toward the application of AI technologies in personalized, engaging, and data-driven interventions for children with CP. However, the field is predominantly in the proof-of-concept stage, with limitations including small sample sizes, lack of long-term clinical validation, challenges in user-centered design, and usability for children with CP. CONCLUSION: AI-powered assistive technologies hold significant potential for transforming the care of children with CP by enabling highly personalized and engaging interventions. To actualize this potential, future work must realize that practical application remains challenging owing to limited clinical validation, technological integration, and usability barriers for children with CP. Future research must prioritize user-centered design and multidisciplinary collaboration to ensure that AI and robotic advancements improve the usability and quality of life for children with CP.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Underrepresented populations in genomic research: a qualitative study of researchers' perspectives.

BACKGROUND: The lack of diversity in genomic data limits researchers' ability to investigate the relationships between genetic profiles, disease manifestations, and responses to new therapies. As a result, innovations in treatment could have potentially harmful effects on a significant portion of the population due to incomplete or inaccurate genomic data. In addition, the lack of harmonization in the use of population descriptors in genomic studies raises both ethical and scientific concerns regarding which descriptors should be used to study and recruit underrepresented populations. Therefore, understanding the factors contributing to the lack of diversity in genomic research is an urgent scientific, clinical, and public health priority. This study aims to explore the social and contextual factors influencing the participation of underrepresented populations in genomic research, from the perspective of researchers in the field. METHODS: A total of 13 semi-structured interviews were conducted with researchers experienced in genomic research in Canada and fluent in either French or English. The interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Researchers identified several factors contributing to the low participation of underrepresented populations in genomic research, with one key factor being the geographic distribution of research institutions and the disconnect between research efforts and the communities being studied. To address this issue, participants stressed the importance of moving away from colonial practices, such as conducting research on a community without consulting its members in the design phase. Furthermore, it was suggested that existing diversity, equity, and inclusion policies alone were insufficient to effectively address the challenge. Lastly, the study also highlighted a potential link between how study populations are categorized and the willingness of underrepresented groups to participate in genomic research. CONCLUSION: Although researchers are generally aware of the literature on the causes, consequences, and potential solutions for increasing participation, confusion remains regarding the use of population descriptors. Our findings highlight the need for improved education, greater consensus, and expanded dialogue within the genomic research community to promote the harmonization of population descriptors.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Exploring the emerging concept of precision rehabilitation: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: This descriptive qualitative study explored knowledge users' perspectives on precision rehabilitation concepts, barriers, facilitators, and future directions as part of a convergent mixed methods scoping review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen clinicians, administrators, and researchers from three North American tertiary care rehabilitation centers were recruited using convenience and snowball sampling to participate in individual semi-structured interviews. Conventional qualitative content analysis followed a deductive thematic approach based on predetermined categories. RESULTS: Analyses revealed three main themes: (1) Although precision rehabilitation shares foundational concepts with precision medicine, there are certain elements, such as personalization, that are uniquely expressed; (2) Rehabilitation-specific facilitators to precision approaches include the use of unobtrusive technology to collect large amounts of data in real-world contexts, while barriers include rehabilitation's typically small, heterogeneous sample sizes; and (3) The future of precision rehabilitation will require collaborative data-sharing to focus on determining care trajectories that enhance functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Findings provide the first qualitative synthesis of knowledge users perspectives to complement quantitative evidence and inform the emerging field of precision rehabilitation.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Caregiver experiences after the death of a person with dementia with Lewy bodies: A mixed-methods analysis.

BackgroundDementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a common degenerative dementia, but no studies investigate bereaved caregiver experiences.ObjectiveTo investigate the experiences of caregivers three months after the death of persons with DLB using a mixed-methods approach.MethodsDyads of individuals with moderate-advanced DLB and their primary informal caregivers were followed prospectively every 6 months until the person with DLB died. Caregivers completed a study visit with questionnaires and a semi-structured interview ∼3 months later. Spearman correlation coefficients and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests evaluated the relationships of post-death measures with pre-death patient and caregiver variables. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews.ResultsSeventy-three caregivers completed visits (mean 3.5 months post-death). Most of the caregivers were women (82.2%) and spouses (76.7%) or adult children (17.8%). Over 40% had scores indicating risk for clinical depression. Post-death caregiver experiences (depression, quality of life, grief, resilience) correlated with pre-death caregiver experiences. Post-death experiences did not associate with patient characteristics, disease-related symptoms, or healthcare services used in the last 6 months of life. Trajectories for caregiver measures from pre- to post-death visits varied widely. Interview themes included grief and sadness, anger, guilt and regret, relief, appreciation/gratitude, and adjusting to a new normal.ConclusionsThe finding that pre-death caregiving experiences have the strongest association with post-death experiences emphasizes the critical importance of accessible and evidence-based caregiver support before and after the death of a person with DLB. Research is needed to develop interventions for current and bereaved caregivers of individuals with DLB.Trial registration informationNCT04829656 (submitted 2021-03-22).

Caregivers↗
PubMed2026

From transcriptomic profiling to precision oncology: a bibliometric analysis of RNA sequencing in acute myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has become an important tool for investigating the molecular heterogeneity of acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, the global development and thematic evolution of this field remain inadequately characterized. OBJECTIVE: To map the global landscape of AML RNA-seq research and identify major knowledge domains, emerging themes, and temporal changes in research priorities. METHODS: Publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus between January 1, 2007, and August 18, 2025, were retrieved. After database filtering, merging, and deduplication, 3,460 articles and reviews were included. CiteSpace, VOSviewer, the bibliometrix R package, and Microsoft Excel were used to analyze publication trends, collaboration networks, co-citation structures, keyword evolution, and citation bursts. RESULTS: Publication output increased steadily, accelerating after 2014. China contributed the largest number of publications (n = 547, 15.8%), whereas the United States had the highest total citation count. Major publication outlets spanned hematology, oncology, genomics, and molecular biology. Co-citation analysis identified prominent themes involving next-generation sequencing, gene mutations, KMT2A rearrangements, epigenetic dysregulation, leukemia-initiating cells, drug resistance, biomarkers, T-cell biology, and single-cell sequencing. Earlier literature emphasized sequencing technologies, gene expression profiling, and molecular alterations, whereas recent publications show increasing representation of cellular heterogeneity, single-cell transcriptomics, drug resistance, biomarker applications, immune-related research, and computational interpretation. CONCLUSION: While molecular characterization remains foundational, AML RNA-seq research has broadened to encompass increasingly prominent cellular, functional, computational, and translational dimensions. This study provides a structured overview of the field; nevertheless, bibliometric prominence should not be interpreted as direct evidence of clinical utility.

RNA sequencing↗
PubMed2026

Insights from expert panels on the EU clinical evaluation consultation procedure.

BACKGROUND: The Clinical Evaluation Consultation Procedure (CECP) under the EU Medical Device Regulation aims to strengthen and harmonize the assessment of high-risk medical devices. This review summarizes early insights from expert panels to support improved clinical evaluation practices. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This review analyses 34 expert panel opinions derived from 281 CECP submissions between April 2021 and December 2025. Statements from opinions were systematically extracted, de-duplicated, and grouped into thematic categories, with independent review and validation. The analysis focuses on common challenges found during the consultation procedure of the expert panels on the content of the clinical assessment in relation to clinical evidence, benefit-risk assessment, intended purpose alignment, and post-market clinical follow-up planning. RESULTS: Expert panel findings highlight recurrent issues in the sufficiency, consistency, and transparency of clinical evidence, underscoring the need for improved standardization and clearer guidance. CONCLUSIONS: Strengthening documentation quality and alignment across stakeholders will enhance the robustness, efficiency, and predictability of conformity assessments for high-risk medical devices.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Bibliometric analysis of retinoblastoma research over the past decade.

BACKGROUND: Retinoblastoma (RB), the most prevalent primary intraocular malignancy in children, has emerged as a model disease for exploring the molecular underpinnings of pediatric cancer. Over the past decade, research in this field has accelerated, propelled by advances in genomics, diagnostic imaging, targeted therapies, and global scientific collaboration. METHODS: This study systematically retrieved RB-related publications from 2015 to 2024 using the Web of Science Core Collection. A total of 4990 articles were included. CiteSpace and VOSviewer were employed to perform bibliometric and visual analyses across multiple dimensions, including countries, institutions, authors, journals, and thematic evolution. RESULTS: The United States and China were identified as the leading contributors, jointly accounting for over 40.55% of all publications. US-based journals led in both publication volume and citation impact, underscoring their global influence. Cluster analysis revealed 4 major research domains: clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis; molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways; gene and protein function studies; and research methodologies and experimental models. CONCLUSION: RB research is transitioning into an era of precision oncology, characterized by molecular subtyping, novel therapeutic targets, and individualized treatment approaches. While diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes have markedly improved in high-income countries, significant disparities persist in low- and middle-income regions due to limited access to early detection and comprehensive care. Future priorities should include the refinement of preclinical models, investigation of drug resistance mechanisms, and promotion of international collaboration to standardize diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. These efforts are critical to improving global outcomes for children with RB.

Retinoblastoma↗
PubMed2026

"Will it be enough to be respected?": understanding personal, institutional, and societal harms and benefits of genomics research.

BACKGROUND: Transgender Identity Genomics Research (TIGR)-research examining potential associations between genetic factors and transgender, nonbinary, and gender diverse (trans) identities-takes place in a complex landscape with significant potential to either benefit or harm trans communities. As public and political scrutiny of trans communities intensifies, the stakes and potential impacts of TIGR are heightened and ethical, legal and social implications must be considered. To better understand how those who would be most affected by TIGR view such research, we explored trans adults' perceptions of TIGR in the current environment and how they perceive TIGR may impact their futures. METHODS: Using a community-based participatory research approach, we partnered with a trans-led Executive Stakeholder Board to conduct in-depth interviews with 31 trans adults in the United States between June-December 2024 and conducted a Reflexive Thematic Analysis. RESULTS: Participants (mean age=34 years, range=19-73 years; 61% people of color; 39% nonbinary, 39% transgender women, 22% transgender men) identified possible benefits of TIGR such as personal affirmation, increased social acceptance, and improved access to gender-affirming healthcare. They also expressed concerns about potential harms, including further stigmatization, discrimination, and pathologization of trans identities. While most viewed research in trans communities (including TIGR) as a net positive, some participants felt it less useful compared to addressing more urgent, material challenges trans communities face. CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore that TIGR, like all scientific research, is shaped by the sociopolitical environment. It is imperative that TIGR researchers engage meaningfully and ethically with trans communities to minimize potential harms and center community needs.

Genetics↗
PubMed2026

Not Forgotten: Patient Experiences with Genetic Variant Reclassifications.

PURPOSE: Genetic variant reclassification is increasingly common in clinical genomics, yet limited data describe how patients experience re-contact and variant reclassification in routine clinical care. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 20 adult patients who received a variant reclassification following routine clinical genetic testing. Interviews explored emotional responses, communication experiences, and perceived value of genetic testing. Data were analyzed using Template Analysis, a form of thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three overarching themes were identified. Participants identified a need for improved communication of reclassified results, particularly with respect to timing, modality, and contextualization (Theme 1). Experiences with reclassification also shaped perceptions of the value of genetic testing, with most participants viewing testing as worthwhile despite its evolving nature (Theme 2). Finally, many participants interpreted reclassification as evidence of personalized and ongoing care, reinforcing trust in genetic testing and biomedical research (Theme 3). Participants generally preferred to be informed of reclassified results regardless of reclassification type, although the direction of reclassification influenced emotional responses and preferred modes of communication. Downgrades from variants of uncertain significance to benign or likely benign were widely viewed as meaningful by participants. CONCLUSION: Variant reclassification was experienced as a signal of personalized, ongoing care. Timely, contextualized, patient-centered re-contact practices may reduce uncertainty, strengthen trust, and help patients not feel forgotten.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2026

Making patient-oriented decisions with collegial support as an anchor: Oncologists' experiences of late-line treatment selection in metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines support oncologists in treatment decision-making for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, treatment decision-making is complicated by the rapid pace of therapeutic advances, the complexity of incorporating patient preferences, and the underrepresentation of diverse populations in clinical trials. This study explored oncologists' experiences of treatment selection in late-line MBC when evidence and guidelines provide limited guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted using a constructivist approach and involved individual interviews with twelve oncologists in Sweden. Participants had between five and forty years of experience in breast cancer care and worked within publicly funded healthcare across academic and regional hospitals. An inductive reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify themes, with attention to both manifest and latent meanings in the data. RESULTS: The overarching theme interpreted was: Making patient-oriented treatment decisions with collegial support as an anchor, reflecting how oncologists adapt their treatment decision-making to patient needs while relying on colleagues for professional stability. Four themes were elucidated: Offering to use professional knowledge and experience to decide; Inviting the patient to a dialogue to decide; Supporting the patient in making the final decision; and Turning to colleagues for advice and support. CONCLUSION: This study challenges the positivist evidence-based assumption that oncologists act as neutral facilitators who simply present treatment options for patients to choose. Instead, it positions oncologists as active decision-makers who clearly state their professional stance, retain responsibility for treatment decisions, and respect patient autonomy, moving beyond the traditional, dichotomized shared decision-making model. IMPLICATIONS TO PRACTICE: We argue that oncologists are active stakeholders in a value-led decision-making process and encourage them to clearly articulate the values underlying their recommendations. This approach enables patients to be addressed with full autonomy, while the ultimate responsibility for treatment decisions remains with the oncologist.

Humans↗
PubMed1977

[Innovative approach of teaching-learning of histology and embriology].

The paper presents an innovative approach to the teaching-learning of histology and embryology. The traditional teaching of the subject in the Faculty of Medical Sciences of Rosario National University, Santa Fe, Rosario, Argentina, up to 1974 is subjected to critical analysis, and on this basis the need for the innovation is propounded and the method for applying it proposed. A detailed account is given of the theoretical framework of the experiment reported, of the general and specific objectives of the teaching-learning technique, and of the thematic units into which the curriculum was divided. In the teaching-learning plan followed--described in the article--the conventional professorial lecture and its accompanying practical demonstrations are replaced by round tables and theoretical-practical tasks requiring active involvement and integrating theory and practice, in which teams tackle problems under teacher coordination. It also provides for evaluation of the students, teachers and course and eliminates the conventional examination.

Argentina↗
PubMed2026

Content validity, face validity and comprehensiveness of generic quality-of-life measures in adults and children with rare genetic conditions and their carers: a think aloud qualitative study.

PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the content validity, face validity and comprehensiveness of the: (a) EQ-5D-5L, EQ-HWB, and ASCOT SCT4, for adults with rare genetic conditions; (b) the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-HWB, and ASCOT-carer for carers of adults or children with rare genetic conditions; and (c) the EQ-5D-Y-5L carer proxy-complete for children with rare genetic conditions. METHODS: In total, 60 qualitative think-aloud interviews were conducted in Australia and England to understand individuals' thought process during the completion of the QoL measures. Participants were subsequently led through a semi-structured discussion. Transcripts were analysed for whether participants demonstrated understanding of the measures and thematic analysis was conducted on responses to the semi-structured discussion. RESULTS: The majority of participants showed good understanding and supported the validity of the measures for people experiencing rare conditions. For carers, however, a broader evaluative space than health-related QoL was preferred. Several non-health domains were identified as important to both patients and carers, including treatment availability, impact on employment and finance, information and uncertainty, medication and carer burden, impact of passing on a condition, relationships and social connection, and experience with the healthcare system. CONCLUSION: This study provides some support for the face validity and comprehensiveness of the measures for people experiencing rare conditions. However, several participants felt that the narrow health domains were inadequate to capture the breadth of their lived experience. Future research should explore the extent to which the measures capture differences and changes in the QoL domains identified as important to patients and carers.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

A Qualitative Analysis of Cancer Survivors' Experience in a Time-Restricted Eating vs Control Clinical Trial to Address Cancer-Related Fatigue.

PURPOSE: To describe cancer survivors' lived experiences in a clinical trial that tested an individualized nutrition counseling with or without time-restricted eating to address cancer-related fatigue. METHODS: The Fatigue REDuction After cancer study was a two-arm, randomized controlled trial. Participants were adult cancer survivors who were 2 months to 2 years post-treatment. All participants received individualized nutrition counseling; those in the time-restricted eating group self-selected a consistent 10-hour eating window for 12 weeks. After the study, semi-structured exit interviews were conducted to gauge participants' experiences in the trial. Interviews were transcribed and two independent coders thematically analyzed the interviews using inductive and deductive coding. NVivo software was used for data organization and analysis. RESULTS: Participants (n = 24; TRE = 11; Control = 13) were 55 ± 13 years old, 75% were female, and they had a variety of cancer types. The majority of participants found that being in the study helped them to set and achieve lifestyle goals and would therefore recommend the study to others. Participants in the time-restricted eating group noted that time-restricted eating helped them set a better routine, providing a positive sense of control. However, some noted difficulty switching to a 14-hour fasting schedule, as it can interfere with their regular routine or employment schedules. Many participants noted they were happy that cancer-related fatigue was gaining more attention, hoping to find solutions for persistent cancer-related fatigue. CONCLUSION: The majority of participants found the study useful and, regardless of their group assignment or the intervention's impact on their fatigue, found the study helped them to gain better control of their dietary habits.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Uncertainty and information management for Lynch syndrome in a genomic screening cohort: Connections to clinical engagement.

OBJECTIVE: Lynch syndrome (LS) is a common hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome. This study explores how individuals learning about LS-related cancer risk through a population genomic screening program appraise, reappraise, and manage uncertainty and engage in medical management. METHODS: We recruited participants with an LS result from a population genomic screening study, purposively sampling based on the characteristics of sex, age, LS gene, and family history of cancer. Semi-structured interviews and chart reviews focused on participants' experiences of learning about the LS result and making management decisions. Thematic analysis and heatmapping were used to explore participant characteristics related to uncertainty management and clinical engagement. RESULTS: Seventeen participants completed interviews, describing uncertainty discrepancies or ambivalent appraisals. Most participants who appraised their LS risk as a threat had high clinical engagement. All participants who had lower clinical engagement received misinformation, had little support from clinicians, or had misunderstandings about LS. CONCLUSION: Accurate information from trusted sources is critical to support uncertainty management and subsequent engagement in clinical risk management choices. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Ensuring primary care providers have the information and tools to provide patients with accurate information may support recommended clinical engagement, thereby improving health outcomes for this population.

Clinical Engagement↗