Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “mutual exclusivity”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Mutually exclusive expression of human red and green visual pigment-reporter transgenes occurs at high frequency in murine cone photoreceptors.

This study examines the mechanism of mutually exclusive expression of the human X-linked red and green visual pigment genes in their respective cone photoreceptors by asking whether this expression pattern can be produced in a mammal that normally carries only a single X-linked visual pigment gene. To address this question, we generated transgenic mice that carry a single copy of a minimal human X chromosome visual pigment gene array in which the red and green pigment gene transcription units were replaced, respectively, by alkaline phosphatase and beta-galactosidase reporters. As determined by histochemical staining, the reporters are expressed exclusively in cone photoreceptor cells. In 20 transgenic mice carrying any one of three independent transgene insertion events, an average of 63% of expressing cones have alkaline phosphatase activity, 10% have beta-galactosidase activity, and 27% have activity for both reporters. Thus, mutually exclusive expression of red and green pigment transgenes can be achieved in a large fraction of cones in a dichromat mammal, suggesting a facile evolutionary path for the development of trichromacy after visual pigment gene duplication. These observations are consistent with a model of visual pigment expression in which stochastic pairing occurs between a locus control region and either the red or the green pigment gene promotor.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

What word learners do when input contradicts the mutual exclusivity assumption.

In 4 studies, 3- to 5-year-olds heard 2 novel English labels each applied to the same novel object by a different adult. In all 4 studies, about half of the children accepted both labels, suggesting that hearing 2 labels applied to an object offers strong enough evidence for some to override mutual exclusivity. Nonetheless, about half of the children honored mutual exclusivity and hence accepted only 1 label; they also seemed to keep both labels in mind for at least a few minutes and settled on whichever label they re-encountered first. This strategy allows children to make an informed choice between 2 apparently equally good labels, without straining their limited memory capacities.

Child Development↗
PubMed1989

The mutual exclusivity bias in children's word learning.

Nearly every recent account of children's word learning has addressed the claim that children are biased to construct mutually exclusive extensions, that is, that they are disposed to keep the set of referents of one word from overlapping with those of others. Three basic positions have been taken--that children have the bias when they first start to learn words, that they never have it, and that they acquire it during early childhood. A review of diary and test evidence as well as the results of four experiments provide strong support for this last view and indicate that the bias develops in the months following the second birthday but does not gain full strength or become accessible to consciousness until sometime after the third birthday. Several studies also show that, after this point, it can still be counteracted by information in input or by a strong belief that something belongs to the extension of a particular word. The full body of evidence is compatible with the view that mutual exclusivity is the default option in children's and adults' procedures for integrating the extensions of new and old words. We present several arguments for the adaptive value of this kind of bias.

Association Learning↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Mutually exclusive versus co-occurring diagnostic categories: the challenge of diagnostic comorbidity.

Diagnostic comorbidity is the rule rather than the exception in both DSM-IV and ICD-10. Three types of comorbidity include true comorbidity (clinically distinct entities), artifactual comorbidity (a byproduct of the DSM/ICD strategy to split categorical diagnoses) and spurious comorbidity. DSM has established 'mutually exclusive' relationships between disorders to reduce such spurious comorbidity. Four types of mutually exclusive relationships are identified: (1) between disorders that are on different levels of the Kraepelinian-defined hierarchy (e.g., schizophrenia and major depressive disorder); (2) between categories with identical features that are split according to age or duration (schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder); (3) between categories in which the defining features of one disorder are contained in the definition of more broadly-defined disorder (Asperger's disorder and autistic disorder), and (4) between categories in which the defining features of one disorder are an associated feature of another disorder (e.g., dysthymic disorder and schizophrenia). Although less comorbidity may be desirable to reduce diagnostic complexity, in the absence of knowledge about underlying pathophysiology, the trend in successive editions of the DSM has been to reduce diagnostic hierarchies and increase comorbidity (e.g., elimination of exclusion between panic disorder and major depression in DSM-III-R because of evidence of independence). It is important to understand that comorbidity in psychiatry does not imply the presence of multiple diseases or dysfunctions but rather reflects our current inability to apply Occam's razor (i.e., a single diagnosis to account for all symptoms).

Comorbidity↗
PubMed2006

Learning words: children disregard some pragmatic information that conflicts with mutual exclusivity.

Children tend to infer that when a speaker uses a new label, the label refers to an unlabeled object rather than one they already know the label for. Does this inference reflect a default assumption that words are mutually exclusive? Or does it instead reflect the result of a pragmatic reasoning process about what the speaker intended? In two studies, we distinguish between these possibilities. Preschoolers watched as a speaker pointed toward (Study 1) or looked at (Study 2) a familiar object while requesting the referent for a new word (e.g. 'Can you give me the blicket?'). In both studies, despite the speaker's unambiguous behavioral cue indicating an intent to refer to a familiar object, children inferred that the novel label referred to an unfamiliar object. These results suggest that children expect words to be mutually exclusive even when a speaker provides some kinds of pragmatic evidence to the contrary.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed1994

The upstream region is required but not sufficient to control mutually exclusive expression of Paramecium surface antigen genes.

Paramecium tetraurelia stock 51 can express at least 11 different surface antigens, yet only one type is found on the surface of a cell at any given time. The mechanism that controls this mutually exclusive expression is unknown. A previous study has shown that the 51A surface antigen gene is regulated at the level of transcription (Gilley, D., Rudman, B. M., Preer, J. R., Jr., and Polisky, B. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 1538-1544). We show here that the 51B surface antigen gene is also transcriptionally regulated, and when the 51A and 51B genes are cotransformed into an A-, B- mutant, the 51A antigen is dominant at 27 degrees C just as in wild type cells. We have utilized this cotransformation system to experimentally determine that 273 base pairs of DNA upstream of the 51A gene is sufficient to allow the dominant expression of A, but 150 base pairs is not adequate. A hybrid gene that contains the upstream region of 51B attached to the 51A transcribed region was cotransformed with the 51B gene into the A-, B- mutant. Despite containing the same upstream sequences, only the hybrid 51B/A was transcribed at 27 degrees C. These results suggest the upstream region is required but not sufficient for mutually exclusive transcriptional control.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

The mutually exclusive flip and flop exons of AMPA receptor genes were derived from an intragenic duplication in the vertebrate lineage.

The incomplete correlation between the organismal complexities and the number of genes among eukaryotic organisms can be partially explained by multiple protein products of a gene created by alternative splicing. One type of alternative splicing involves alternative selection of mutually exclusive exons and creates protein products with substitution of one segment of the amino acid sequence for another. To elucidate the evolution of the mutually exclusive 115-bp exons, designated flip and flop, of vertebrate AMPA receptor genes, the gene structures of chordate (tunicate, cephalochordate, and vertebrate) and protostome (Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans) AMPA receptor subunits were compared. Phylogenetic analysis supports that the vertebrate flip and flop exons evolved from a common sequence. Flip and flop exons exist in all vertebrate AMPA receptor genes but only one 115-bp exon is present in the genes of tunicates and cephalochordates, suggesting that the exon duplication event occurred at the ancestral vertebrate AMPA receptor gene after the separation of vertebrates from primitive chordates. The structures of animal AMPA receptor genes also suggest that an intron insertion to separate the primordial flip/flop exon from the M4-coding exon occurred before the exon duplication event and probably at the chordate lineage.

Alternative Splicing↗
PubMed2004

Using single-strand conformational polymorphism gel electrophoresis to analyze mutually exclusive alternative splicing.

Single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis has been used successfully to identify single nucleotide changes within sequences based on the fact that multidetection enhancement gels will separate molecules based on their conformation rather than their size. We have expanded the utility of this technique to analyze easily the alternative splicing of pre-mRNAs containing multiple mutually exclusive exons of the same size. We have used this technique to study the Caenorhabditis elegans let-2 gene containing two alternative exons and the Drosophilia melanogaster Dscam gene, which contains 12 mutually exclusive exons. The ease and the quantitative nature of this technique should be very useful.

Alternative Splicing↗
PubMed2005

FGFR3 and Ras gene mutations are mutually exclusive genetic events in urothelial cell carcinoma.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutations are frequent in superficial urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC). Ras gene mutations are also found in UCC. As oncogenic activation of both FGFR3 and Ras is predicted to result in stimulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, we hypothesized that these might be mutually exclusive events. HRAS mutation has been widely studied in UCC, but all three Ras gene family members have not been screened for mutation in the same sample series. We screened 98 bladder tumours and 31 bladder cell lines for mutations in FGFR3, HRAS, NRAS and KRAS2. FGFR3 mutations were present in 54 tumours (55%) and three cell lines (10%), and Ras gene mutations in 13 tumours (13%) and four cell lines (13%). These included mutations in all three Ras genes; ten in HRAS, four in KRAS2 and four in NRAS and these were not associated with either tumour grade or stage. In no cases were Ras and FGFR3 mutation found together. This mutual exclusion suggests that FGFR3 and Ras gene mutation may represent alternative means to confer the same phenotype on UCC cells. If these events have biological equivalence, Ras mutant invasive UCC may represent a novel subgroup.

Carcinoma, Transitional Cell↗
PubMed2000

p53 gene mutation and ink4a-arf deletion appear to be two mutually exclusive events in human glioblastoma.

P16 and P14ARF are two tumor suppressors encoded by the locus ink4a-arf which is frequently deleted in human tumors. Recent experiments performed with mouse embryonic fibroblasts have shown that P14ARF is an upstream regulator of the P53 pathway. This raises the question as to whether in human tumors the loss of p14arf and mutation of p53 are mutually exclusive events which segregate with genetic alterations at other loci. To examine this question we performed a multigenic analysis on 29 gliomas. We analysed p53 and p14arf in relation with five other genetic loci encoding the most frequently mutated genes in human gliomas: cdkn2a, mdm2, egfr, pten and the chromosomal regions 10q23.3 and 10q25-26. Our study shows for the first time that p53 mutations and p14arf deletions appear mutually exclusive in human glioblastoma, suggesting that they may be functionally redundant in glioma tumorigenesis. The P53 pathway is, therefore, disrupted in 81.8% of malignant gliomas (WHO grades III and IV), either by mutation of the p53 gene (31.8%) or by p14arf deletion (54.5%). These tumors further showed MDM2 overexpression (9.1%), egfr oncogene amplification/egfr overexpression (50%), pten mutations (27.3%) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the chromosomal regions 10q23.3 (86.4%) and 10q25-26 (100%). These alterations did not segregate with p53 mutations or p14arf deletions, while p14arf and cdkn2a were always deleted.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

In vitro splicing of mutually exclusive exons from the chicken beta-tropomyosin gene: role of the branch point location and very long pyrimidine stretch.

The chicken beta-tropomyosin gene contains 11 exons, two of which are spliced into mRNA only in skeletal muscle. One pair of alternative exons, 6A and 6B, is found in the middle of the gene; they are spliced in a mutually exclusive manner. The non-muscle splice 6A-7 is by far the predominant in vitro reaction in a HeLa cell nuclear extract. A minor product is the 6A-6B splice, which is excluded in all tissues. This minor product results from the use of a branch point located 105 nt upstream of the 3' end of the intron separating exons 6A and 6B. The region between the branch point sequence and the final AG contains a stretch of approximately 80 pyrimidines. We have examined the role of the distance of the branchpoint to the 3' splice site and of the sequences between these two elements. Our results suggest that at least two cis-acting elements contribute to the mutual exclusivity of exons 6A and 6B. The intron between exons 6A and 6B is intrinsically poorly 'spliceable' both because the branch point is too far upstream of the 3' end of the intron to give efficient splicing and because of the particular sequence lying between this branch point and the 3' splice site.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Early occurrence of RASSF1A hypermethylation and its mutual exclusion with BRAF mutation in thyroid tumorigenesis.

Follicular epithelial cell-derived thyroid tumors are common neoplasms comprised mainly of benign thyroid adenomas, follicular thyroid cancers, and papillary thyroid cancers (PTCs). Hypermethylation of the tumor suppressor gene RASSF1A and activating mutation of BRAF gene have been reported recently in thyroid cancers. To additionally investigate the roles of these two epigenetic/genetic alterations in thyroid tumor progression, we examined their occurrences and relationship in both benign and malignant thyroid neoplasms. With real-time quantitative methylation-specific PCR, we found that 4 of 9 (44%) benign adenomas, 9 of 12 (75%) follicular thyroid cancers tumors, and 6 of 30 (20%) of PTC tumors harbored promoter methylation in > or = 25% of RASSF1A alleles. Additional quantitative analysis revealed RASSF1A methylation only in BRAF mutation-negative PTCs. A similar inverse correlation of RASSF1A methylation with BRAF mutation was seen in thyroid tumor cell lines. Our results, therefore, suggest that epigenetic inactivation of RASSF1A through aberrant methylation is an early step in thyroid tumorigenesis. Like the previously reported mutually exclusive relationship between BRAF mutation and other Ras pathway components such as RET/PTC rearrangement, a mutually exclusive relationship also exists between BRAF mutation and RASSF1A methylation in thyroid tumorigenesis.

Cell Line, Tumor↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Mutually exclusive interactions of EHD1 with GS32 and syndapin II.

GS32/SNAP-29 is a SNAP-25-like SNARE and has been shown to interact with syntaxin 6. Using immobilized recombinant GS32, we have recovered EHD1 as a major GS32-interacting protein from total HeLa cell extracts. This interaction is mediated by the EH domain of EHD1 and the N-terminal NPF-containing 17-residue region of GS32. Co-immunoprecipitation suggests that GS32 could also interact with EHD1 in intact cells. When immobilized GST-EHD1 was used to fish out interacting proteins from total brain extracts, syndapin II was identified as a major interacting partner. Similar to the GS32-EHD1 interaction, syndapin II also interacts with the EH domain of EHD1 via its NPF repeat region. Interaction of endogenous EHD1 and syndapin II was also established by co-immunoprecipitation. Furthermore, interaction of GS32 and syndapin II with EHD1 was shown to be mutually exclusive, suggesting that EHD1 may regulate/participate in the functional pathways of both GS32 and syndapin II in a mutual exclusive manner. Opposing roles of GS32 and syndapin II in regulating the surface level of transferrin receptor (TfR) were observed.

Amino Acid Motifs↗
PubMed2002

HLA-patterns in patients with multiple sclerosis and type I diabetes mellitus: evidence for possible mutual exclusion of both diseases.

BACKGROUND: Type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and multiple sclerosis (MS), both immune-mediated diseases, rarely co-exist in the same individual or co-segregate in families. HLA susceptibility genes for T1DM (DRB1*0401, DRB1*0404, DQB1*0302, DRB1*0301, DQB1*0201) rarely occur in MS patients. HLA genes known to confer "resistance" to T1DM (DRB1*1501, DQB1*0602-DQA1*0102) predispose to MS. To test the hypothesis of mutually exclusive HLA patterns, patients affected by T1DM plus MS were compared to those of patients affected by either of the diseases alone in a case-control study. METHODS: Blood was sampled for analysis of HLA class I and class II alleles from 66 patients of German ancestry, of whom 33 had T1DM plus MS, and 33 had MS-only. For comparison to patients with T1 DM-only we referred to published data. HLA typing was performed using conventional serology (immuno-magnetic beads) and genotyping (SSP-PCR Dynal(R) SSP low/high resolution kits). RESULTS: Individuals with co-existing MS plus T1DM displayed the expected T1DM associated HLA-pattern (75.8% carried DRB1*04, 69.7% carried DQB1*0302, 42% were DR4, DR3 heterozygous), but failed to display the expected MS associated HLA-pattern (0% carried DQB1*0602, 3.1% carried DQA1*0102). The expected MS associated HLA-pattern of Caucasoid patients, however, was found in the MS-only patients (42% carried DRB1*1501-DQB1*0602, 58% carried DQA1*0102), while the prevalence of T1DM susceptibility and 'resistance' alleles was not different from the general population. The allele frequency of DRB1*1501 was 16/66, 24.2% in the 33 MS-only patients, and 0% in the 33 MS plus T1DM patients. The allele frequency of DQB1*0602 was 16/66, 24.2% in the 33 MS-only patients, and 0% in the 33 MS plus T1DM patients. The allele frequency of DQA1*0102 was 18/66, 27.3%, in the 33 MS-only patients, and 1/66 1.5% in the 33 MS plus T1DM patients. CONCLUSION: These data confirm the hypothesis of mutually exclusive HLA-patterns of T1DM and MS, and are consistent with a low rate of co-morbidity of both diseases.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Gamma-secretase-like cleavages of Notch and beta APP are mutually exclusive in human cells.

Presenilins 1 and 2 are two transmembrane proteins that seem necessary for controlling the proteolytic cleavages of two substrates, betaAPP and Notch, giving rise to Abeta (amyloid beta-peptide) and NICD (Notch Intracellular Domain), respectively. It is a matter for discussion whether presenilins act directly as the cleaving enzyme (referred to as gamma-secretase) or indirectly as a regulator of the substrates/enzymes trafficking to the permissive cell compartment where gamma-secretase cleavage could occur. Here we examined whether betaAPP and Notch undergo mutually exclusive proteolytic events in HEK293 cells or whether they behave as substrates able to compete for a single protease. We show that the overexpression of mDeltaE-Notch-1 does not influence the endogenous recovery of secreted and intracellular Abeta nor those derived from betaAPP-overexpressing HEK293 cells. We establish, conversely, that increasing amounts of betaAPP do not modify the steady-state generation of NICD nor affect the kinetic of production. These data indicate that the proteolytic cleavages leading to the productions of Abeta and NICD are mutually exclusive events in HEK293 cells, and suggest that distinct proteolytic activities contribute to betaAPP and Notch processing.

Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases↗
PubMed1979

Linear cooperative binding of large ligands involving mutual exclusion of different binding modes.

A rigorous treatment is given for mutually exclusive multiple mode cooperative binding on a linear structure of equivalent binding "contacts". This will be of special interest with regard to larger ligands implicating the possibility that there are different kinds of binding interactions with more than one monomeric sub unit of a linear biopolymer. Quantitative evaluation of binding properties is shown to be essentially based on calculating the largest root of an algebraic equation. The whole procedure can be practically executed by means of a fairly simple computer program. Various typical examples comprising only two modes are discussed in more detail. For some nucleotide-polylysine systems definite binding parameters have been determined from pertinent experimental data.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2002

Role of a locus control region in the mutually exclusive expression of human red and green cone pigment genes.

Trichromacy in humans and other Old World primates evolved from a dichromatic color vision system approximately 30-40 million years ago. One essential part of this evolution was the duplication and divergence of sequences on the X chromosome to create the present-day red and green cone pigment genes. Earlier work demonstrated that a locus control region (LCR) located upstream of these genes is essential for their expression. In the present work, we have generated a variety of modified human red and green pigment gene arrays that direct the expression of distinguishable histochemical reporters from each gene promoter. Transgenic mice carrying a single copy of each modified array were studied to define the role of three variables in producing mutually exclusive expression of red and green pigment transgenes: the distance between the promoter and the LCR, the identity of the visual pigment promoter, and LCR copy number. The results support a model in which the mutually exclusive expression of these genes in their respective cone types is controlled by competition between visual pigment promoters for pairing with the LCR, and they suggest a facile mechanism for the evolution of trichromacy after visual pigment gene duplication.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Binding of the [125I]3 beta-(iodophenyl)tropan-2 beta-carboxylic acid isopropyl ester to the dopamine transporter at a physiologically relevant temperature: mutually exclusive binding and different ionic requirements for various uptake blockers and substrates.

The present study describes the binding of cocaine analog [125I]3 beta-(iodophenyl)tropan-2 beta-carboxylic acid isopropyl ester ([125I]RTI-121), a highly selective ligand for the dopamine transporter (DAT), to rat striatal synaptosomal membranes at 37 degrees C. Saturation analysis of [125I]RTI-121 binding revealed a single binding site with similar affinity for RTI-121 at both 50 and 134 mM NaCl. However, the density of binding sites was reduced at 134 mM NaCl. Various uptake blockers and substrates of the DAT monophasically inhibited the specific binding of [125I]RTI-121. Increasing the NaCl concentration from 50 mM to 134 mM enhanced the affinity of the substrate dopamine and amphetamine for the DAT, without affecting that of the uptake blockers. At 134 mM NaCl, the copresence of GBR12935, BTCP, cocaine, amphetamine, or dopamine decreased the affinity of RTI-121 to the extent predicted by a model in which the binding of all compounds is mutually exclusive. This, along with a different NaCl sensitivity for blockers and substrates, suggests that the two categories of compounds recognize nonidentical but overlapping binding domains on the DAT. In contrast, the mutually exclusive binding with similar NaCl sensitivity for RTI-121 and the other uptake blockers tested here suggests the involvement of common binding domains in the recognition of these blockers.

Animals↗