Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “immune checkpoint”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Paradoxical Effect of Myosteatosis on the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has shifted from tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy, improving outcomes but with variable individual responses. This study investigated the prognostic implications of pretreatment low skeletal muscle mass (LSMM) and myosteatosis in patients with mRCC undergoing first-line ICI-based therapies, comparing outcomes between PD-1 inhibitor&#x2009;+&#x2009;CTLA-4 inhibitor and PD-1 inhibitor&#x2009;+&#x2009;TKI, incorporating single-cell RNA sequencing. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 90 patients with mRCC treated with ICI-based therapies between November 2019 and March 2023. Patients were grouped based on whether they received PD-1 inhibitor&#x2009;+&#x2009;CTLA-4 inhibitor or PD-1 inhibitor&#x2009;+&#x2009;TKI combinations. LSMM was defined as skeletal muscle index below 40.8&#x2009;cm2/m2 for men and 34.9&#x2009;cm2/m2 for women. Myosteatosis was defined using skeletal muscle density, with cut-off values <&#x2009;41&#x2009;HU for BMI&#x2009;<&#x2009;25&#x2009;kg/m2 and <&#x2009;33&#x2009;HU for BMI&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;25&#x2009;kg/m2. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable models. Single-cell RNA sequencing was performed on pretreatment samples to compare the immune microenvironment between patients with and without myosteatosis. RESULTS: The study cohort (26.7% female; median age: 60.5&#x2009;years) included 59 patients (65.6%) treated with PD-1 inhibitor&#x2009;+&#x2009;CTLA-4 inhibitor and 31 patients (34.4%) treated with PD-1 inhibitor&#x2009;+&#x2009;TKI. LSMM was present in 18.9% of patients, and myosteatosis in 41.1%, with comparable proportions across groups. During follow-up, 29 patients (32.2%) died: 16 in the PD-1 inhibitor&#x2009;+&#x2009;CTLA-4 inhibitor group and 13 in the PD-1 inhibitor&#x2009;+&#x2009;TKI group. The overall 1-year mortality rate was 22.2%, and PFS rate was 53.3%. Myosteatosis predicted poor OS (HR, 5.389; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.008) and PFS (HR, 2.930; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.022) in the PD-1 inhibitor&#x2009;+&#x2009;TKI group but was protective for PFS (HR, 0.461; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.049) in the PD-1 inhibitor&#x2009;+&#x2009;CTLA-4 inhibitor group. LSMM did not significantly affect outcomes in either group. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed higher CTLA-4 expression in regulatory T cells and more effector memory CD8+ T cells in patients with myosteatosis, whereas patients without myosteatosis had more anti-tumoural non-classical monocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Myosteatosis negatively impacts OS and PFS in patients with mRCC treated with PD-1 inhibitor&#x2009;+&#x2009;TKI therapy but is protective for PFS in those treated with PD-1 inhibitor&#x2009;+&#x2009;CTLA-4 inhibitor therapy. Altered checkpoint expression and immune cell composition associated with myosteatosis may contribute to these differential responses.

Humans

Soluble immune-checkpoint factors: a potential immunotherapy biomarker.

There is unmet need for additional biomarkers to better select patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that are likely to benefit from immunotherapy in order to improve patient outcomes, reduce patient toxicity, and relieve the growing burden of healthcare costs. In this issue of the JCI, Hayashi and colleagues evaluated soluble forms of the immune checkpoint molecules PD-L1, PD-1, and CTLA-4 in the plasma of patients with advanced NSCLC who had been treated with anti-PD-1/L1 therapy. The findings suggest that these soluble immune-checkpoint factors may provide a complementary biomarker to PD-L1 IHC, although application into the clinic may not be straightforward.

Humans

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-related Adverse Events in Publicly Accessible United States Malpractice Records: A Systematic Legal Database Review, 2015 to 2026.

OBJECTIVES: By 2023, an estimated 56.7% of US patients with advanced or metastatic cancer were eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Grade 3 to 4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occur in &#x223c;14% to 21% of patients depending on regimen, yet publicly accessible malpractice records involving ICI administration or irAE management have not been systematically described. METHODS: We searched Lexis+ and Westlaw Advantage for publicly accessible US malpractice records filed from January 1, 2015, through March 31, 2026. Sources included jury verdicts and settlement databases, federal and state dockets, and briefs, pleadings, and motions databases. Cases were included only when ICI administration, indication selection, toxicity counseling, toxicity recognition, toxicity monitoring, or irAE management was causally central to the alleged negligence. RESULTS: Among 38 legal matters identified after cross-platform deduplication, 4 met eligibility criteria. These matters reflected 4 pleaded negligence theories: inappropriate ICI indication, toxicity counseling and informed-consent failure, irAE mismanagement, and treatment-related multiorgan toxicity. Publicly visible irAE-centered malpractice records were rare relative to the clinical burden, but the data do not support a national litigation incidence estimate. CONCLUSIONS: Publicly accessible irAE-centered malpractice records appear rare. As ICI use expands, litigation risk may increasingly focus on indication documentation, individualized toxicity counseling, and structured monitoring.

immune checkpoint inhibitors

Predictive Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy: Challenges, Innovations, and a Pathway to Precision Medicine in the Era of Cancer Immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed oncology practice. However, treatment response remains heterogeneous, rendering predictive biomarkers critical for optimal patient care. The 3 established biomarkers, programmed death-ligand 1, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability-high/deficient mismatch repair, are approved and clinically validated but are modest predictors of benefit. As a result, multiple novel predictive biomarkers remain under investigation. CONTENT: This review highlights established and investigational predictive ICI efficacy biomarkers. For established biomarkers, we describe biology, assay modalities, approved companion diagnostics, landmark studies, and notable limitations. Due to the multisystem nature of antitumor immune effects, investigational biomarkers span multiple domains, including tumor genomic biomarkers (e.g., mutational signatures, TMB, neoantigen clonality), tumor microenvironment (e.g., tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [TILs], tertiary lymphoid structures), systemic immune biomarkers (e.g., cytokines, autoantibodies, glycoproteins, peripheral blood mononuclear cells), and the microbiome (e.g., gastrointestinal microbial diversity, responder-enriched taxa). SUMMARY: The established biomarkers PD-L1, TMB, and microsatellite instability-high/deficient mismatch repair inform ICI use in clinical practice but have important limitations. Multiple investigational biomarkers show promise in refining patient selection and optimizing therapy. Moving forward, increased assay harmonization, prospective validation, and standardized parameters may improve performance. Composite models integrating complementary signals across domains may further individualize treatment and lead to an era of personalized cancer immunotherapy.

Humans

The clinical value of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to radiotherapy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: While several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have explored the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment for patients undergoing radiotherapy, studies systematically assessing the clinical value of such interventions are lacking. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant RCTs of cancers that received ICIs plus radiotherapy or radiotherapy. Eligible studies were those published in English as of 14 April 2024. Two independent reviewers screened the included studies and extracted relevant data, then selected the random or fixed-effects model based on the I2 statistic. The main outcomes were hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs for objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). Stratified analysis was performed based on cancer type, ICI type, and the timing of ICI addition. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024551008). RESULTS: 15 RCTs with 7947 patients were included. Pooled HRs were 0.865 (95% CI, 0.730-1.000; I2 = 72.1%) for OS and 0.799 (0.677-0.922; I2 = 82.0%) for PFS in cancer patients. In cancer types, adding immunotherapy to radiotherapy significantly improved patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (OS: 0.544 [0.371-0.717]; PFS: 0.527 [0.438-0.617]) and cervical cancer (OS: 0.722 [0.578-0.867] and PFS: 0.754 [95%CI, 0.621-0.887]). Regarding the ICIs schedule, adjuvant ICI therapy with pooled HRs was 0.742 (0.649-0.834) for OS and 0.638 (0.579-0.697) for PFS. In addition, the pooled ORs for the incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related and immune-related adverse events were 1.227 (1.059-1.421; I2 = 71.9%) and 2.217 (1.743-2.821; I2 = 74.0%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Adding immunotherapy to radiotherapy can provide significant clinical benefits for patients with NSCLC and cervical cancer, and the addition of these ICIs in the adjuvant stage is supported.

Humans

Chronotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors: The knowns, the unknowns, and the contested.

Emerging data indicate that immune checkpoint inhibitors can exhibit time-of-day-dependent effects in pre-clinical models. Furthermore, multiple retrospective clinical trials associate earlier anti-tumor treatment timing with improved outcomes. However, key questions remain regarding the reproducibility of these findings, the underlying mechanisms, and their clinical implications. This commentary discusses these open questions and provides an outlook on the field.

Journal Article

The Impact of Molecular Characteristics on the Efficacy of Frontline Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma.

Background: Metastatic melanoma in East Asian populations is enriched for acral and mucosal subtypes and harbors a distinct molecular landscape compared with Western cutaneous melanoma. However, data on the efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and on the impact of molecular characteristics on treatment effect in this population remain limited. We aimed to characterize the genomic landscape of an East Asian metastatic melanoma cohort and to evaluate the predictive values of molecular markers for first-line ICI therapy. Methods: This study included 135 patients with metastatic melanoma who received first-line ICI at Samsung Medical Center between January 2022 and December 2025. Of these, 108 with paired next-generation sequencing (NGS) data were included in the molecular analysis. Survival outcomes were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the prognostic value of molecular subtype was assessed using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Mucosal melanoma was the most common primary site (58, 43.0%), followed by acral melanoma (31, 23.0%) and cutaneous melanoma (25, 18.5%); 4 (3.0%) had uveal melanoma and 17 (12.6%) had melanoma of other or unknown primary origin. The overall objective response rate to first-line ICI was 37.8% (51 of 135), and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0-9.6). Using the hierarchical classification, 108 patients were classified into five molecular subtypes: BRAF-altered (n = 17, 15.7%), RAS-altered (n = 17, 15.7%), KIT-altered (n = 15, 13.9%), and NF1-altered (n = 7, 6.5%), and quadruple-wild-type (n = 52, 48.1%). TMB-high status (10.2%) showed no significant association with outcomes. Molecular subtype was significantly associated with PFS (log-rank p = 0.009). After multivariable adjustment, BRAF fusion (hazard ratio [HR] 5.05, 95% CI 1.70-14.98, p = 0.003) and KIT-altered status (HR 2.91, 95% CI 1.46-5.77, p = 0.002) emerged as independent adverse prognostic factors, whereas BRAF V600 single-nucleotide variants did not differ significantly from quadruple-wild-type. Conclusions: In this East Asian metastatic melanoma cohort, BRAF fusion and KIT alterations were independent adverse prognostic factors for first-line ICI. These findings suggest that BRAF fusion and KIT-altered tumors may represent distinct subgroups that warrant further investigation.

immune checkpoint inhibitor

Reconsidering the definition of triple-negative breast cancer in the immune checkpoint inhibitor era: an optimal cut-off value for hormone receptor percentage of HER2-negative invasive breast cancer.

The optimal cut-off values of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) expression to define the positivity of ER and PgR have been under discussion for over a decade but remain controversial. The American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) and the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus recommended that breast cancers with &#x2265;1% of ER or PgR expression should be considered hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors but ER/PR expression of 1% to 10% should be reported as HR-low positive; however, among HER2-negative disease, data on the overall benefit of adjuvant endocrine therapies for patients with HR-low positive disease is limited, resulting in the revisiting of the definition of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Defining HR-low positive disease by better understanding the biology is essential because of the recent advancement of neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapy strategies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for TNBC. Additionally, identifying who should be treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy, particularly those who have HR-low HER2-negative disease, which is currently treated as TNBC without adjuvant endocrine therapy, is a clinical unmet need. In clinical practice, treating physicians have tailored systemic treatment strategies using other clinical and pathological factors (i.e., age, grade, Ki-67, tumor size, lymph node involvement). There is no universal practice to treat patients with HR-low HER2-negative breast cancer. This review summarized the currently available data to define the clinically relevant optimal cut-off values of ER/PgR in neoadjuvant- and adjuvant-setting. We recommend considering creating a novel category of triple-negative like breast cancer (TN-like BC), which will require a therapeutic strategy different from conventional TNBC.

Humans

Combination of cyclin-dependent kinase and immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of bladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: Perturbation of the CDK4/6 pathway is frequently observed in advanced bladder cancer. We investigated the potential of targeting this pathway alone or in combination with chemotherapy or immunotherapy as a therapeutic approach for the treatment of bladder cancer METHODS: The genetic alterations of the CDK4/6 pathway in bladder cancer were first analyzed with The Cancer Genome Atlas database and validated in our bladder cancer patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDXs). Bladder cancer cell lines and mice carrying PDXs with the CDK4/6 pathway perturbations were treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib to determine its anticancer activity and the underlying mechanisms. The combination index method was performed to assess palbociclib and gemcitabine drug-drug interactions. Syngeneic mouse bladder cancer model BBN963 was used to assess whether palbociclib could potentiate anti-PD1 immunotherapy. RESULTS: Of the 413 bladder cancer specimens, 79.2% harbored pertubations along the CDK4/6 pathway. Palbociclib induced G0/G1 cell cycle arrest but with minimal apoptosis in vitro. In mice carrying PDXs, palbociclib treatment reduced tumor growth and prolonged survival from 14 to 32&#xa0;days compared to vehicle only controls (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.0001). Palbociclib treatment was associated with a decrease in Rb phosphorylation in both cell lines and PDXs. Palbociclib and gemcitabine exhibited antagonistic cytotoxicity in vitro (CI&#x2009;>&#x2009;3) and in vivo, but palbociclib&#xa0;significantly enhanced the treatment efficacy of anti-PD1 immunotherapy and induced CD8+ T lymphocyte infiltration in syngeneic mouse models. CONCLUSIONS: The CDK4/6 pathway is feasible as a potential target for the treatment of bladder cancer, especially in combination with immunotherapy. A CDK4/6 inhibitor should not be combined with gemcitabine.

Animals

NPLOC4 Constructs Tumor Immunosuppressive Microenvironment in Pan-cancer and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: NPLOC4 (nuclear protein localization 4 homolog) is mainly involved in DNA damage, cell cycle, and ubiquitination promotion. Nonetheless, the role of NPLOC4 in the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and its potential as a promising tumor therapeutic target remains unclear. METHODS: Therefore, analyses of NPLOC4 mRNA and protein expression, RNA subcellular localization, and patient prognosis associated with NPLOC4 expression were conducted across multiple tumor types. Additionally, the correlations between NPLOC4 and immune cells, non-immune cells, and immune molecules within the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) were investigated. These analyses utilized data from various public resources, including the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE), The Human Protein Atlas (HPA), Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC), TIMER2.0, KM-Plotter, The University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Data Analysis Portal (UALCAN), and Tumor Immune Single-cell Hub 2 (TISCH2). Subsequently, we utilized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients' cancer and adjacent tissues plus tumor cell lines to verify the differential RNA and protein expression of NPLOC4 via qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Then, the relationship of NPLOC4 expression level with immune infiltration score, infiltration of effector immune cells, suppressive immune cells, and several vital immune checkpoints was analyzed in HCC immune microenvironment. Furthermore, the distribution of expression of NPLOC4 in various cells in the HCC microenvironment was determined through single-cell sequencing analysis. RESULTS: We discovered that NPLOC4 was up-regulated in a variety of tumors and was correlated with poor prognosis. NPLOC4 not only had the potential as a tumor prognostic marker and therapeutic target but also was strongly linked to immune cells, immune checkpoints, and immune-related molecules and pathways in HCC immune microenvironment. CONCLUSION: In summary, NPLOC4 may serve as a promising target for immunotherapy.

Humans

Genetic insights into lung squamous cell carcinoma: how TP53 and CSMD3 co-mutations shape prognosis and immune response.

BACKGROUND: Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) accounts for a significant proportion of lung cancer cases and is often associated with smoking and various environmental factors. The prognostic and immunologic implications of TP53 and CSMD3 co-mutations in LUSC remain poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the role of TP53/CSMD3 co-mutations in LUSC using comprehensive bioinformatics analyses. METHODS: Data from 487 LUSC patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, with external validation performed using the combined cohort. Patients were stratified into TP53/CSMD3 co-mutation, single-mutation, and wild-type (WT) groups. Prognostic analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was calculated, and immune cell infiltration was assessed using multiple algorithms. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between co-mutated and WT groups were identified, followed by Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses. A nomogram incorporating mutation status, gender, age, and tumor stage (T stage) was developed for individualized prognostic prediction. RESULTS: The TP53/CSMD3 co-mutated group exhibited significantly better overall survival (OS) compared to single-mutation and WT groups. TMB scores were markedly higher in co-mutated patients, suggesting potential sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Immune infiltration analysis revealed distinct profiles, including elevated CD8 T cells and reduced immunosuppressive components, in the co-mutation group. A total of 403 DEGs were identified between co-mutated and WT groups, with significant enrichment in immune-related pathways. Mechanistically, the co-mutation was associated with distinct downregulation of complement negative regulators (CFH/CFI), indicating complement hyperactivation independent of TMB. The constructed nomogram provided accurate individualized prognostic assessments. CONCLUSIONS: The co-mutation of TP53 and CSMD3 identifies a distinct LUSC subtype with favorable survival, marked by high TMB and an immune-activated microenvironment. Beyond TMB-driven neoantigen generation, the significant downregulation of complement negative regulators (CFH/CFI) reveals an independent complement hyperactivation pathway associated with CSMD3 loss. The constructed nomogram provides accurate individualized survival prediction. These findings establish TP53/CSMD3 co-mutation as a promising prognostic biomarker and offer mechanistic insights for personalized immunotherapy strategies. Future prospective cohorts are warranted to validate its predictive value.

Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC)

Conserved miRNA regulators of PD-1/PD-L1 in glioblastoma and colorectal cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis have transformed cancer therapy, but their efficacy remains limited in glioblastoma (GBM) and heterogeneous in colorectal cancer (CRC). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level, including immune checkpoint molecules, yet conserved regulatory miRNA networks across distinct cancers remain poorly defined. Five conserved miRNAs (miR-106a-5p, miR-106b-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-20b-5p, miR-138-5p) fulfilled the selection criteria and were consistently dysregulated in GBM and CRC. MiR-106a-5p and miR-106b-5p were upregulated in both cancers and showed favourable prognostic associations, with higher expression correlating with improved survival. miR-20a-5p and miR-20b-5p were preferentially expressed in microsatellite-stable (MSS) CRC and correlated with favourable outcomes in both cancers, whereas miR-138-5p was downregulated in both tumours compared to normal tissue, but showed opposite survival associations, with higher levels linked to worse prognosis. Correlation analysis revealed significant inverse associations between several miRNAs and checkpoint gene expression, including moderate inverse correlations for CD274-miR-106a-5p in GBM, CD274-miR-20a-5p in CRC and PDCD1LG2-miR-20a-5p in both cancers. Pan-cancer profiling demonstrated broad and heterogeneous dysregulation, with expression absent in ovarian cancer for four of the five miRNAs. Pathway enrichment implicated the TGF-&#x3b2;, Hippo, FoxO, and cell cycle pathways, consistent with their known roles in tumour immune evasion. We identified a conserved set of miRNAs that are dysregulated in both GBM and CRC, correlate with survival, and display inverse relationships with PD-1/PD-L1/PD-L2 expression. These miRNAs represent candidate regulators of the PD-1/PD-L1/PD-L2 axis and potential biomarkers of tumour biology that may influence immune checkpoint signalling.

Humans

GFER Represents a Target for Dual Disruption of Redox Homeostasis and Reactivation of the Immune Response in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

UNLABELLED: Both metabolic dysregulation and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) contribute to the recalcitrance of this lethal disease to treatment. Accordingly, we aimed to identify and characterize a target that elicits an anticancer response through both disrupting cancer cell redox homeostasis and increasing the immunogenicity of PDAC. First, mitochondrial metabolic dependencies in PDAC were identified by using a CRISPR-Cas9 screening system with a custom single-guide RNA library. Functional validation analyses revealed GFER, a mitochondrial FAD-dependent sulfhydryl oxidase, as an essential regulator of tumor growth. In vitro and in vivo methodologies demonstrated that GFER depletion perturbed redox homeostasis and stimulated tumor immunogenicity, including sensitization to immune checkpoint blockade. In patient-derived xenograft models of PDAC, the growth-inhibitory response induced by GFER depletion was mediated by an altered oxidative balance that released damaged mitochondrial DNA into the cytoplasm of tumor cells, leading to the activation of the cGAS-STING pathway and expression of type I IFNs. This effect was recapitulated in a mouse immunocompetent syngeneic PDAC model, in which GFER depletion suppressed tumor growth and promoted T-cell infiltration to enhance tumor-killing effects. Consequently, GFER depletion significantly increased the antitumor efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade. Overall, these findings identify GFER as a critical node for both mitochondrial redox homeostasis and immunomodulation in PDAC and reveal a therapeutic opportunity for sensitizing PDAC to immune checkpoint blockade. SIGNIFICANCE: GFER is essential for mitochondrial redox balance and suppressing tumor immunogenicity in pancreatic tumors, with the combination of GFER inhibition with immune checkpoint blockade resulting in a strong antitumor response.

Animals

Cancer Immunotherapy: Therapeutic Limitations and Next-Generation Precision Strategies.

Cancer immunotherapy has reshaped oncology, largely through immune checkpoint inhibitors that release the brakes on tumor-reactive T cells. Yet the benefit remains uneven, and that unevenness traces back to a few basic biological limits. Checkpoint blockade amplifies immunity that is already present; it does not create tumor specificity de novo. Poor Ag quality, defective Ag presentation, a suppressive microenvironment, and epigenetically fixed T-cell exhaustion together set a ceiling on what checkpoint release can achieve. Next-generation strategies try to move past these limits by reorganizing immunotherapy around the functional layers of the immune response. Cancer vaccines define tumor-specific neoantigens and expand the responses against them. Ab-based approaches tune inhibitory signaling, draw immune cells toward the tumor, and trigger immunogenic cell death. Cellular therapies-chimeric Ag receptor T cell, TCR-engineered T cells, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs)-boost effector potency, with TIL therapy notable for preserving tumor-reactive repertoires shaped in vivo. Rather than rivals, these modalities are best seen as complementary layers-Ag definition, immune priming, effector optimization, and microenvironmental conditioning-to be combined in a programmable way. As genomic profiling, immunopeptidomics, and high-dimensional immune monitoring mature, the field is shifting from checkpoint-centered release toward precision immunoengineering, in which tumor-specific immunity is deliberately designed, aligned, and sustained.

Cancer vaccines

A novel glycogene-related signature for prognostic prediction and immune microenvironment assessment in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma (KIRC) is a prevalent urinary malignancies worldwide. Glycosylation is a key post-translational modification that is essential in cancer progression. However, its relationship with prognosis, tumour microenvironment (TME), and treatment response in KIRC remains unclear. METHOD: Expression profiles and clinical data were retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus databases. Consensus clustering, Cox regression, and LASSO regression analyses were conducted to develop an optimal glycogene-related signature. The prognostic relevance of this molecular signature was rigorously analyzed, along with its connections to tumour microenvironment (TME), tumour mutation burden, immune checkpoint activity, cancer-immunity cycle regulation, immunomodulatory gene expression patterns, and therapeutic response profiles. Validation was performed using real-world clinical specimens, quantitative PCR (qPCR), and immunohistochemistry (IHC), supported by cohort analyses from the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database. RESULTS: A glycogene-associated prognostic scoring system was established to categorize patients into risk-stratified subgroups. Patients in the high-risk cohort exhibited significantly poorer survival outcomes (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). By incorporating clinicopathological variables into this framework, we established a predictive nomogram demonstrating strong calibration and a concordance index (C-index) of 0.78. The high-risk subgroup displayed elevated immune infiltration scores (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), upregulated expression of immune checkpoint-related genes (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05), and an increased frequency of somatic mutations (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.043). The risk score positively correlated with cancer-immunity cycle activation and immunotherapy-related signals. The high-risk groups also showed associations with T cell exhaustion, immune-activating genes, chemokines, and receptors. Drug sensitivity analysis revealed that low-risk patients were more sensitive to sorafenib, pazopanib, and erlotinib, whereas high-risk individuals responded better to temsirolimus (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.01). qPCR and IHC analyses consistently revealed distinct expression patterns of MX2 and other key genes across the risk groups, further corroborated by the HPA findings. CONCLUSION: This glycogene-based signature provides a robust tool for predicting prognosis, TME characteristics, and therapeutic responses in KIRC, offering potential clinical utility in patient management.

Humans

Prognostic value of genes associated with metastasis and propionate metabolism in rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Research indicates that alterations in propionate metabolic pathways play a critical role in cancer development and invasion. Postoperative metastatic recurrence remains a major cause of mortality in patients with rectal cancer. However, propionate metabolism-related genes (PMRGs) in rectal cancer remain insufficiently characterized. Therefore, this study aimed to identify prognostic biomarkers associated with lymph node metastasis and propionate metabolism and construct a risk&#x2011;prediction model for rectal cancer via bioinformatic analyses. METHODS: The Cancer Genome Atlas-Rectum Adenocarcinoma (TCGA-READ) and GSE87211 datasets, together with a curated PMRGs gene set, were used in this study. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to assess associations between overlapping genes (differentially expressed genes between READ and normal tissues, as well as between N0 and N1-N2 stages) and PMRGs, leading to the identification of candidate genes. Functional enrichment analyses were subsequently conducted to characterize the biological roles of these candidates. Prognostic biomarkers were identified using univariate Cox regression combined with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and a prognostic model was constructed accordingly. Independent prognostic validation was then performed. In addition, immune checkpoint profiling and immunotherapy response analyses were conducted across risk subgroups. Single-gene Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was applied to elucidate the pathways associated with the identified biomarkers. Finally, drug sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 157 candidate genes were identified through the analytical pipeline. Functional enrichment analysis indicated that these genes were primarily involved in inflammatory response regulation and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling pathways. Five prognostic biomarkers were subsequently identified and incorporated into a predictive model. External validation using the GSE87211 cohort confirmed the robustness of the model. Risk score and disease status were identified as independent prognostic factors. Six immune checkpoint molecules exhibited differential expression between risk groups. Correlation analyses revealed that the risk score was positively associated with most immune checkpoint genes. Single-gene GSEA demonstrated that the biomarkers were mainly enriched in ribosomal biogenesis and cell adhesion molecule-related pathways. Furthermore, 51 therapeutic agents exhibited significantly different half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values between risk subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified five biomarkers (CCL24, IGFBP3, ODC1, PYGM, and VKORC1) associated with lymph node metastasis and propionate metabolism pathways, providing a potential foundation for prognostic prediction in patients with rectal cancer.

Rectal cancer

Pan-cancer analysis identifies APOC1 as a TAM-derived modulator of adaptive immune resistance and predictor of therapeutic response.

BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein C1 (APOC1) has been implicated in several malignancies, yet its expression patterns, clinical significance, and immunomodulatory roles across cancer types remain poorly characterized. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive multi-omic analysis of APOC1 across 33 cancer types integrating transcriptomic, proteomic, genomic, epigenomic, and pharmacogenomic data from TCGA, GTEx, CPTAC, and multiple independent external cohorts. Immune infiltration was assessed using seven complementary algorithms. Spatial transcriptomics and single-cell RNA sequencing were employed to determine the cellular source of APOC1 expression. RESULTS: APOC1 upregulation in most cancers was associated with cancer type-specific prognosis. After adjustment for clinical covariates and macrophage infiltration, high APOC1 remained an independent adverse factor in KIRC, LGG, and STAD. APOC1 expression positively correlated with genomic instability hallmarks, including homologous recombination deficiency and aneuploidy, with these associations largely independent of immune infiltration; in contrast, associations with tumor mutational burden were substantially confounded by macrophage abundance. Immune infiltration analysis revealed a pattern consistent with adaptive immune resistance: APOC1 correlated positively with immune-activating signatures (STAT1, MHC-II, TCR signaling) and immunosuppressive M2 macrophages and Tregs, yet negatively with anti-tumor effectors (activated NK cells, dendritic cells). Spatial transcriptomics and single-cell RNA sequencing identified tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) as the primary cellular source of APOC1, with transcripts co-localizing with CD68 in tissue sections. APOC1 expression correlated with multiple immune checkpoint molecules and was elevated in responders to immune checkpoint blockade, consistent with an inflamed yet regulated tumor microenvironment. Pharmacogenomic analyses revealed that APOC1-high tumors display distinct drug response profiles, characterized by resistance to MAPK pathway inhibitors and potential sensitivity to the HDAC inhibitor Entinostat. CONCLUSION: This pan-cancer analysis establishes APOC1 as a context-dependent biomarker and a TAM-derived modulator of adaptive immune resistance, with prognostic and therapeutic implications across malignancies. APOC1-expressing TAMs represent a potential target for combination immunotherapy strategies.

APOC1

KLHL17 as a Prognostic Indicator and Therapeutic Target in Cervical Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to clarify the role of kelch like family member 17 (KLHL17) in cervical cancer (CESC) is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To clarify this uncertainty, our research employed bioinformatics analysis coupled with experimental corroboration. METHODS: We utilized the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database to assess the expression of KLHL17 in various cancers, specifically CESC, and to explore its association with clinical characteristics, diagnostic utility, and prognostic significance in CESC. The current investigation delved into the potential regulatory pathways related to KLHL17, examining its connection with the infiltration of immune cells, the expression of immune checkpoint genes, the status of microsatellite instability (MSI), and the efficacy of diverse therapeutic agents in CESC. The research analyzed KLHL17 expression patterns using single-cell sequencing data from CESC samples and investigated the genetic variations of KLHL17 within this context. KLHL17 expression was validated using GSE145372. The presence and levels of KLHL17 in different cell lines were validated through quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) assays. RESULTS: KLHL17 exhibited irregular expression profiles across various cancer types, including CESC. Furthermore, increased KLHL17 levels in CESC patients were significantly associated with a lower progression-free survival (PFS) rate (hazard ratio: 1.62; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-2.60, p = 0.044). Moreover, KLHL17 expression emerged as a distinct prognostic indicator for CESC patients (p = 0.031). It has been associated with various biological pathways, such as cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, primary immunodeficiency, cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), chemokine signaling pathway, steroid hormone biosynthesis, and others. The expression levels of KLHL17 were found to correlate with the presence of immune cells, the expression of immune checkpoint genes, and the status of MSI within CESC. Furthermore, KLHL17 expression exhibited a significant and inverse correlation with XMD15-27, rTRAIL, Paclitaxel, tp4ek, and tp4ek-k6. Furthermore, KLHL17 was found to be significantly positively regulated in CESC cell lines. DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that KLHL17 is involved in the progression of CESC and may serve as a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target. KLHL17's association with immune cell infiltration and immune checkpoint genes indicates a role in immuneevasion. Future research should focus on validating these findings through independent datasets and experimental studies to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying KLHL17's role in CESC progression and immune regulation. CONCLUSION: KLHL17 is a promising prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target in CESC.

Humans