Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “WISCONSIN”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Improved preservation of rat hindlimbs with the University of Wisconsin solution and butanedione monoxime.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of the University of Wisconsin solution plus butanedione monoxime, the University of Wisconsin solution without butanedione monoxime, and saline on the preservation of muscle tissue. Forty-nine rat hindlimbs were amputated and replanted. The study population was subdivided into four groups according to flushing solution, storage, and replantation protocols. The limbs of the control group (n = 12) were flushed with 20 ml University of Wisconsin solution and immediately replanted onto the same rat. In the remaining three groups, the limbs were immersed in solution, stored in a refrigerator at 4 degrees C for 24 hours, and then replanted onto a fresh rat. The limbs in the no flushout group (n = 7) were placed into storage in cold saline solution without being flushed. The limbs in the University of Wisconsin solution group (n = 17) were flushed with 20 ml of University of Wisconsin solution prior to storage, and those in the University of Wisconsin solution plus butanedione monoxime group (n = 13) were flushed with 20 ml University of Wisconsin solution plus 20 mM butanedione monoxime. Limb survival rate was 100 percent for the control and University of Wisconsin solution plus butanedione monoxime groups, 87 percent for the University of Wisconsin solution group, and 71 percent for the no flushout group. Seven days after replantation, ATP levels were 71 percent of control in the University of Wisconsin solution plus butanedione monoxime group, 33 percent in the University of Wisconsin solution group, and 29 percent in the no flushout group. Tissue K+/Na+ ratio showed that the University of Wisconsin solution plus butanedione monoxime group maintained electrolyte balance, whereas the balance was significantly lowered in University of Wisconsin solution and no flushout groups. The University of Wisconsin solution plus butanedione monoxime limbs did not exhibit cell swelling, whereas total tissue water values for the University of Wisconsin solution and no flushout groups increased significantly. Serum creatinine kinase, measured 24 hours after replantation, was 120 percent of control in the University of Wisconsin solution plus butanedione monoxime group, 550 percent in the University of Wisconsin solution group, and 772 percent in the no flushout group. Limbs in the University of Wisconsin solution plus butanedione monoxime group had more flexible ankle joints and pliable muscle (i.e., less contracture) than those in the University of Wisconsin solution and no flushout groups. In conclusion, rat hindlimbs can be preserved hypothermically for 24 hours using the University of Wisconsin solution, the University of Wisconsin solution plus butanedione monoxime, or saline. However, the University of Wisconsin solution plus butanedione monoxime limbs had better ATP levels and less cellular injury after replantation. Based on these results, we believe that, biochemically, flushing and storage of muscle tissue in the University of Wisconsin solution plus butanedione monoxime are the most effective means of those studied for preserving composite tissue grafts for 24 hours.

Adenine Nucleotides↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Incomplete recovery of working heart function after twenty-four-hour preservation with a modified University of Wisconsin solution.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: This study was designed to determine the function of isolated rabbit hearts after static preservation with modified University of Wisconsin solution for 24 hours. Commercially available University of Wisconsin solution, modified with CaCl2 1 mmol/L and 2,3-butanedione monoxime 30 mmol/L, was used as the preservative. After flushing the coronary vasculature with medium, hearts were submersion stored at 1 degree C to 4 degrees C. After preservation, isolated heart function at 37 degrees C was quantified for 30 minutes in a non-ejecting mode and for 4 hours ejecting at a physiologic workload. Fresh control hearts (n = 5) and University of Wisconsin solution-preserved hearts (n = 6) were studied. RESULTS: Nonworking (non-ejecting) left ventricular function of the two groups did not differ, except for peak rate of left ventricular pressure development which was higher for the University of Wisconsin solution hearts than for controls. When the hearts were subjected to a physiologic workload, however, left ventricular function of the two groups differed significantly. Three of the six University of Wisconsin solution hearts failed before the 4-hour perfusion end point, whereas all five control hearts maintained stable working function for the full 4 hours. The University of Wisconsin solution hearts, while in the ejecting mode, exhibited significantly impaired function. Mean values were as follows (p < 0.05): left ventricular systolic pressure (in millimeters of mercury), control 105 +/- 1, University of Wisconsin solution 86 +/- 4; peak rate of left ventricular pressure development (in millimeters of mercury per millisecond), control 3.33 +/- 0.11, University of Wisconsin solution 2.39 +/- 0.24; cardiac output (in milliliters per minute per gram), control 400 +/- 25, University of Wisconsin solution 288 +/- 26; stroke work (in milliJoules per gram), control 20.1 +/- 1.3, University of Wisconsin solution 11.9 +/- 1.1; left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (in millimeters of mercury), control 5.4 +/- 0.3, University of Wisconsin solution 10.2 +/- 1.3; peak aortic flow rate (in milliliters per minute), control 946 +/- 9, University of Wisconsin solution 659 +/- 44; millimoles of lactate produced in 30 min/Joule stroke work, control 0.50 +/- 0.06, University of Wisconsin solution 6.99 +/- 0.37. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that (1) hypothermic storage in this modified University of Wisconsin solution does not preserve hearts sufficiently to support a physiologic workload for an extended period and (2) assessment of post-preservation function with a non-ejecting heart model does not accurately predict the ability of the preserved heart to support a physiologic workload.

Adenosine↗