Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Vigabatrin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Drug dependence study on vigabatrin in rhesus monkeys and rats.

The dependence potential of vigabatrin (gamma-vinyl GABA; R(-)/S(+)-4-amino-5-hexenoic acid, CAS 60643-86-9, MDL 71,754) was assessed in rhesus monkeys and rats. In the test of cross physical dependence potential, morphine- and barbital-dependent monkeys were both withdrawn from the respective drugs and the ability of vigabatrin to suppress the withdrawal signs was assessed. In morphine-dependent monkeys, subcutaneous doses of vigabatrin at 256 and 1000 mg/kg did not suppress withdrawal signs while subcutaneous doses of codeine phosphate at 4 and 8 mg/kg clearly suppressed the withdrawal signs. In barbital-dependent monkeys, subcutaneous and intravenous dose of vigabatrin, both at 1000 mg/kg, did not suppress the withdrawal signs, while intragastric doses of diazepam at 8 and 16 mg/kg clearly suppressed them. Thus, while the cross-physical dependence potential of codeine/morphine and of diazepam/barbital was clearly observable, vigabatrin appeared to have no such potential. In the test of physical dependence-producing potential with the drug-admixed food method in rats, vigabatrin and diazepam were given to rats mixed with food for 28 days in an increasing dosage schedule, followed by feeding a drug-free diet to observe withdrawal signs for 7 days. Upon withdrawal, no decrease in food intake or body weight was observed in the vigabatrin-treated groups, and the gross condition of the animals did not differ from that in the control group. In contrast, food intake and body weight decreased markedly in the diazepam group, and most rats showed hyperreactivity to external stimuli. Thus, while the physical dependence-producing potential of diazepam was clearly demonstrated, such potential was not shown with vigabatrin. In the test of reinforcing effect, 4 monkeys were allowed to self-administer pentobarbital at 1 mg/kg/infusion, or vigabatrin at 16, 32, and 64 mg/kg/infusion, intravenously through an indwelling catheter. Each drug was preceded and followed by saline self-administration for at least 7 days. Active self-administration of pentobarbital was observed in all monkeys tested, while the self-administration rate of vigabatrin did not differ from saline. Thus, while the reinforcing effect of pentobarbital was clearly observed, such effect was not observable with vigabatrin. Based on these results, it was considered that vigabatrin was devoid of dependence potential.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

The pharmacokinetics of vigabatrin in rat blood and cerebrospinal fluid.

PURPOSE: Data on the blood pharmacokinetics of vigabatrin, an antiepileptic drug with a unique and novel mechanism of action, in the rat are sparse. Additionally, little is known of the kinetics of vigabatrin in the central cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartment. We therefore investigated the rate of penetration into and the inter-relationship between serum and CSF compartments following systemic administration of vigabatrin in the rat. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with a jugular vein catheter and a cisterna magna catheter for blood and CSF sampling, respectively. Vigabatrin was administered by intraperitonial injection at three different doses (250, 500 and 1000mg/kg) and blood and CSF collected at timed intervals up to 8h. Vigabatrin concentrations in sera and CSF were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Vigabatrin concentrations in blood and CSF rose linearly and dose-dependently and the time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was 0.4 and 1.0h, respectively. Vigabatrin is not protein bound in serum and its elimination from serum (mean t1/2 values, 1.1-1.4 h) is rapid and dose-independent. The efflux of vigabatrin from CSF was significantly slower than that seen for serum (mean t1/2 values, 2.2-3.3h). CONCLUSIONS: The kinetics of vigabatrin are linear with rapid entry into CSF. However, although vigabatrin CSF kinetics parallel that seen in serum, CSF vigabatrin concentrations represent only 2% of concentrations seen in serum and do not reflect free drug concentrations in serum.

Animals↗

The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Longitudinal ERG study of children on vigabatrin.

The purpose of this longitudinal study was to identify changes in ERG responses associated with vigabatrin treatment. We accomplished this by recording longitudinally ERGs in children before and during vigabatrin treatment and comparing results between children on vigabatrin monotherapy and those taking additional anticonvulsive medications. Thirty-three children on vigabatrin therapy were tested; the duration between visits was approximately 6 months. Thirteen children were assessed initially before starting vigabatrin therapy and seven were assessed soon after (age range 1.5-126 months, median 6 months). The remaining 13 patients were already on vigabatrin at the time of initial visit (age range 6.5-180 months, median 16 months). ERGs were tested using the standard protocol established by the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision, with Burian-Allen bipolar contact-lens electrodes. In addition to standard responses we recorded photopic oscillatory potentials (OPs). All 33 patients were tested longitudinally on at least two occasions and 11 were tested on three occasions. For children whose only anticonvulsive drug was vigabatrin there was a significant curvature (quadratic function, p < 0.05) of the predicted cone b-wave amplitude with time; exhibited as increase in b-wave amplitude followed by subsequent decrease. Descriptive data demonstrated the same pattern in the group taking anticonvulsive medications in addition to vigabatrin. In most children the flicker amplitude declined between 6 months and 1 year of vigabatrin treatment. Our data demonstrated that rod responses, which may be abnormal before initiation of vigabatrin, did not change substantially with vigabatrin treatment.

Adolescent↗

Epilepsy patients treated with vigabatrin exhibit reduced ocular blood flow.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Reduced cerebral blood flow and decreased glucose metabolism have been identified in epilepsy patients receiving vigabatrin. It is likely that such a change may extend to the eye and may be linked to previously reported irreversible visual field defects. The aim of this study was to determine whether patients who have undergone anti-epileptic drug (AED) therapy with vigabatrin have altered ocular haemodynamics. METHODS: The study cohort comprised 11 normal subjects (mean age 42.6 (SD 12.7) years and 17 epilepsy patients, of which 10 were either currently or previously treated with vigabatrin (38.6 (11.7) years) and seven were treated with AEDs excluding vigabatrin (46.0 (9.8) years). The three groups were matched at baseline for pulse rate, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, and intraocular pressure (IOP). At a single visit, the ocular blood flow analyser (OBFA; Paradigm Medical Instruments Inc, UT, USA) was used to measure pulsatile ocular blood flow (POBF) and pulse amplitude (PA) in each eye of all subjects. One way ANCOVA (with age as a covariate) was used to identify differences in POBF and PA between the groups. For the vigabatrin group only, Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient was used to explore potential interactions between ocular blood flow parameters and cumulative vigabatrin dose, duration, and maximum dose. RESULTS: Both the vigabatrin treated epilepsy group and conventionally treated epilepsy group exhibited significantly reduced POBF (p=<0.001, p=0.040) and PA (p=<0.001, p=0.005) compared to normal subjects. Patients treated with vigabatrin exhibited a further reduction in POBF (p=0.046) and PA (p=0.034) compared to conventionally treated epilepsy patients. No significant correlations were found between drug dosage and POBF and PA for the vigabatrin treated epilepsy group. CONCLUSIONS: A significant reduction in POBF and PA is apparent in epilepsy patients treated with AEDs when compared to normal subjects. A further reduction in POBF and PA is apparent between vigabatrin treated and conventionally treated patients. The reduction in ocular perfusion, which is more pronounced in patients previously treated with vigabatrin, may have implications in the impairment of visual function associated with the drug.

Adult↗

Vigabatrin.

OBJECTIVE: To introduce the reader to the use of a new agent, vigabatrin, in the treatment of refractory complex partial seizures. Clinical trials and pharmacokinetic data are reviewed, as well as neuropathology, adverse effects, drug interactions, and dosage guidelines. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search through March 1992 was used to identify pertinent English-language literature, including clinical trials, reviews, abstracts, and conference proceedings. Indexing terms included vigabatrin and anticonvulsants. STUDY SELECTIONS: All clinical trials (total of 21) were reviewed, as were all pharmacokinetic studies (total of 8). Selected studies highlighting chemistry, pharmacology, neuropathology, and adverse effects were also reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Performed subjectively by the author. Trials were assessed by design, sample size, types of seizures of the subjects, and clinical response. DATA SYNTHESIS: Vigabatrin represents the first of a new class of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs)--the gamma-aminobutyric acid transaminase (GABA-T) inhibitors. Vigabatrin works by selective, irreversible inhibition of GABA-T, thus preventing the breakdown of GABA. It has been shown to produce dose-dependent increases in cerebrospinal fluid GABA concentrations, and decreases in GABA-T activity. Vigabatrin may also cause a decrease in excitation-related amino acids. It is well absorbed, is not protein bound, and is eliminated by glomerular filtration. However, even with a short half-life (5-7 h), vigabatrin may be given once or twice daily because of its mechanism of action. Few drug interactions have been reported with this agent, although decreases in phenytoin concentration may reach clinical significance. Concern over neuropathologic findings (microvacuolization of white matter) in animals caused trials of vigabatrin to be halted in 1983, but trials have now resumed as there is no evidence of toxicity in humans. Clinical efficacy of vigabatrin has been evaluated in controlled trials and appears to be most effective in complex partial seizures, producing a 50 percent or greater reduction in seizure frequency in approximately 50 percent of the adult patients studied. Efficacy in children with partial seizures also appears promising, and one uncontrolled study suggests that further study of vigabatrin in infantile spasms may be warranted. CONCLUSIONS: Vigabatrin appears to be effective in treating refractory complex partial seizures in adults and refractory partial seizures in children. Its relatively benign adverse-effect profile and few known drug interactions may given this agent an advantage over existing anticonvulsants. However, definitive conclusions about the role of vigabatrin in epilepsy treatment should await the completion of ongoing Phase II and Phase III trials.

Adult↗

Vigabatrin vs carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. A randomized, controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cognitive effects of initial vigabatrin monotherapy compared with initial carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. DESIGN: Open, randomized, controlled design. Follow-up period of 12 months. SETTING: University hospital with an epilepsy center. PATIENTS: A total of 100 patients, aged 15 to 64 years, classified as suffering from partial seizures and/or generalized tonic-clonic seizures were randomized to either vigabatrin or carbamazepine monotherapy. Fifty-nine patients with a single epileptic seizure and no antiepileptic drug treatment served as a control population for objective safety measures. OUTCOME MEASURES: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and toxicity of vigabatrin and carbamazepine, the drug success rate (ie, the proportion of patients continuing successful treatment with the randomly assigned drug) after 12 months of steady-state treatment was used. To evaluate the safety of the drugs in addition to reported side effects, visual evoked potential recordings and neuropsychological evaluation were performed during follow-up. RESULTS: During the 12-month follow-up period, 60% of patients receiving vigabatrin and carbamazepine were treated successfully. Vigabatrin caused fewer side effects that required discontinuation of therapy. However, vigabatrin had to be discontinuated more often owing to lack of efficacy, and fewer of the successfully treated patients receiving vigabatrin achieved total freedom from seizures. Vigabatrin had no detrimental effects on cognitive functions. Retrieval from both episodic and semantic memory and flexibility of mental processing improved significantly in patients successfully treated with vigabatrin. CONCLUSION: Vigabatrin seems to be an effective and safe antiepileptic drug as primary monotherapy for epilepsy with fewer cognitive side effects than carbamazepine.

Adult↗

Color vision in epilepsy patients treated with vigabatrin or carbamazepine monotherapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate color vision in epilepsy patients treated with vigabatrin or carbamazepine monotherapy and to evaluate the association between vigabatrin-induced visual field defects and dyschromatopsia. DESIGN: Nonrandomized comparative trial. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two epilepsy patients treated with vigabatrin monotherapy, 18 patients treated with carbamazepine monotherapy, and 47 age-matched healthy controls were examined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Color vision was examined with Standard Pseudoisochromatic Plates 2 (SPP2) screening test, Farnsworth-Munsell 100 (FM 100) hue test, and Color Vision Meter 712 anomaloscope. RESULTS: Abnormal color perception was found in 32% of the epilepsy patients treated with vigabatrin monotherapy and 28% of the epilepsy patients treated with carbamazepine monotherapy. The total error score in the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue test was abnormally high in the vigabatrin monotherapy patients who had concentrically constricted visual fields and a statistically significant correlation was found between the temporal visual field extents and the age-adjusted Farnsworth-Munsell 100 total error score in vigabatrin monotherapy patients (R = .533, P = 0.003 in the right eye, R = .563, P = 0.001 in the left eye). Four of 31 (12%) vigabatrin monotherapy patients, and 1 of 18 (6%) carbamazepine monotherapy patients had a blue axis in Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue test. In the anomaloscope, there were a few pathologic findings in both groups. In the SPP2 screening test, a few plates were not seen in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both examined antiepileptic drugs, vigabatrin and carbamazepine, cause acquired color vision defects. The abnormal color perception seems to be associated with constricted visual fields in the vigabatrin monotherapy patients. The duration of carbamazepine therapy correlates with high FM100 total error score. The best method for detecting dyschromatopsia in patients treated with vigabatrin or carbamazepine was the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue test. The SPP2 screening test does not seem to be useful in clinical practice.

Adult↗

Changes in the electroretinogram resulting from discontinuation of vigabatrin in children.

Electroretinograms (ERGs) have been recorded longitudinally in children before and during treatment with the antiepileptic drug vigabatrin for the past 3.5 years. Vigabatrin induced changes in ERG responses occur in children; the most dramatic changes occur in the oscillatory potentials. The purpose of this study was to identify changes in ERG responses associated with discontinuation of vigabatrin treatment. If vigabatrin-induced changes reverse after discontinuation of the drug we infer that the original change is not an indicator of toxicity. ERG data were analyzed from 17 children who discontinued vigabatrin therapy. The duration of treatment ranged from 5 to 52 months, the age for the first ERG ranged from 6 to 38 months (median 10 months). ERGs were tested using the standard protocol established by the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision, with Burian-Allen bipolar contact-lens electrodes. In addition to standard responses we recorded photopic oscillatory potentials (OPs). During vigabatrin treatment OPs show a greater change than other ERG responses, with the early occurring wavelets from the photopic OPs showing the greatest change. With discontinuation of vigabatrin the amplitude of the early wavelets of the photopic OPs increased dramatically compared with amplitudes while taking the drug (paired t-test, p = 0.000075). The scotopic oscillatory potentials also show some recovery. Although changes in oscillatory potentials may occur with vigabatrin toxicity, a large change likely occurs with a non-toxic pharmacological effect of vigabatrin on GABAergic amacrine cells in the inner plexiform layer. Reduction of OPs in children on vigabatrin may not be related to toxicity.

Anticonvulsants↗

Visual field defects associated with vigabatrin therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of visual field defects in patients taking the anticonvulsant drug vigabatrin and to characterise the features of visual dysfunction found. METHODS: Thirty three unselected patients attending neurology and epilepsy clinics were identified as taking vigabatrin and asked to attend for neuro-ophthalmic evaluation. A control group of 16 patients with epilepsy unexposed to vigabatrin was also evaluated. Visual fields were examined by static perimetry using a Humphrey field analyser. Patients underwent detailed ophthalmic examination, various blood tests, and brain MRI where necessary. Visual evoked responses (VERs), electro-oculograms (EOGs), and electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded. RESULTS: Of 31 assessable patients treated with vigabatrin, 16 (52%) had definitely abnormal visual fields, nine (29%) had fields that were inconclusive, four (13%) had normal fields, and two (6%) proved unable to cooperate with testing. In four patients some plausible cause was found for the field abnormality leaving 12 patients (39%) in whom a definite bilateral field defect was found, possibly caused by vigabatrin treatment. Of 16 control patients none had definitely abnormal fields, 12 (75%) had normal fields, and four (25%) had fields that were inconclusive. The field defects associated with vigabatrin treatment showed a characteristic pattern of concentric peripheral field loss with temporal and macular sparing. The VERs and ERGs were normal. The EOG Arden Index was reduced in patients taking vigabatrin, although this returned towards normal when vigabatrin was stopped, even in the presence of persistent field defects. Multifocal ERGs recorded in two patients were abnormal, showing marked reduction in amplitude of the peripheral focal ERG. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with vigabatrin was associated with a high prevalence of peripheral visual field defects. This seemed to be the result of a toxic effect of vigabatrin on the retina and seemed to persist if the drug was withdrawn.

Adolescent↗

The legacy of vigabatrin in a regional epilepsy clinic.

OBJECTIVES: To review all patients who had received vigabatrin at the Walton Centre to determine the incidence of visual field defect, seizure outcome if vigabatrin had been stopped, and adherence to guidelines on the use of vigabatrin in clinical practice. METHODS: Retrospective review of 583 patients prescribed vigabatrin at any time between 1989 and 2001 from a regional and satellite epilepsy clinic. Data were collected on dose and duration of treatment, results of quantitative perimetry, and reasons for, and outcome of, discontinuation. RESULTS: The visual fields were abnormal with no alternative cause in 42 of the 98 tested (43%). There was no clear relation between the cumulative dose of vigabatrin received and the occurrence of a visual field abnormality. Fifty patients continued taking vigabatrin, and a further 84 were lost to follow up while taking vigabatrin. In 75 patients who had stopped vigabatrin due to a visual field abnormality or concern over this potential adverse effect, the seizure control was no different or had improved in 66 (88%), while it had deteriorated in only 7 (9%). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the previously reported high incidence of asymptomatic visual field defects associated with vigabatrin. Many patients taking vigabatrin may not have been counselled about the risks, and there are significant cost implications in tracing and assessing those patients lost to follow up. Switching over to another antiepileptic drug usually does not result in deterioration in seizure control, but in clinical practice an individual risk to benefit ratio needs to be taken into consideration.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗

Vigabatrin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in epilepsy and disorders of motor control.

Vigabatrin was specifically designed to enhance gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) function in the CNS. By increasing brain concentrations of this inhibitory neurotransmitter the drug appears to decrease propagation of abnormal hypersynchronous discharges, thereby reducing seizure activity. At this stage in its development, clinical experience with vigabatrin is limited primarily to patients with refractory seizure disorders. In this difficult-to-treat population, 'add-on' therapy with vigabatrin greater than or equal to 2 g/day has shown impressive efficacy, reducing seizure frequency by greater than or equal to 50% in approximately half of patients. Clinical efficacy does seem to vary with seizure type with the best response reported in adults with complex partial seizures with or without generalisation and in children with cryptogenic partial epilepsy or symptomatic infantile spasm. Vigabatrin appears to have a negative effect on absences and myoclonic seizures. Some disorders of motor control may also be amenable to enhanced GABAergic function. In the small number of patients with tardive dyskinesia treated to date, vigabatrin produced mild to moderate improvement in hyperkinetic symptom scores but Parkinsonism or schizophrenic symptoms occasionally worsened. The best response was reported in a study of patients who had been withdrawn from neuroleptic therapy. In a small but well-controlled comparative trial, vigabatrin was as effective as baclofen in reducing spasm and improving some parameters of spasticity in patients with spinal cord lesions or multiple sclerosis. Most adverse reactions to vigabatrin are mild and transient with central nervous system (CNS) changes being reported most frequently. Of particular note, serial evoked potential studies and the few available histology reports have not found evidence of intramyelinic oedema during therapeutic use, as was reported in rats and dogs on chronic high-dose treatment. Thus, vigabatrin is a promising new anticonvulsant drug. Current evidence supports a trial of this agent as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory seizure disorders, and future investigation of vigabatrin monotherapy and its efficacy relative to established agents is awaited with interest. Wider experience should help to clarify which patients - by seizure type and concurrent CNS pathology - are likely to benefit from vigabatrin and ongoing monitoring should further clarify the potential detrimental effects, if any, of long term use. In the meantime, it is a welcome addition in the difficult setting of resistant epilepsy.

4-Aminobutyrate Transaminase↗

Randomized trial of vigabatrin in patients with infantile spasms.

BACKGROUND: Infantile spasms are a rare but devastating pediatric epilepsy that, outside the United States, is often treated with vigabatrin. The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of vigabatrin in children with recent-onset infantile spasms. METHODS: This 2-week, randomized, single-masked, multicenter study with a 3- year, open-label, dose-ranging follow-up study included patients who were younger than 2 years of age, had a diagnosed duration of infantile spasms of no more than 3 months, and had not previously been treated with adrenocorticotropic hormone, prednisone, or valproic acid. Patients were randomly assigned to receive low-dose (18-36 mg/kg/day) or high-dose (100-148 mg/kg/day) vigabatrin. Treatment responders were those who were free of infantile spasm for 7 consecutive days beginning within the first 14 days of vigabatrin therapy. Time to response to therapy was evaluated during the first 3 months, and safety was evaluated for the entire study period. RESULTS: Overall, 32 of 142 patients who were able to be evaluated for efficacy were treatment responders (8/75 receiving low-dose vigabatrin vs 24/67 receiving high doses, p < 0.001). Response increased dramatically after approximately 2 weeks of vigabatrin therapy and continued to increase over the 3-month follow-up period. Time to response was shorter in those receiving high-dose versus low-dose vigabatrin (p = 0.04) and in those with tuberous sclerosis versus other etiologies (p < 0.001). Vigabatrin was well tolerated and safe; only nine patients discontinued therapy because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm previous reports of the efficacy and safety of vigabatrin in patients with infantile spasms, particularly among those with spasms secondary to tuberous sclerosis.

Anticonvulsants↗

Randomized trial comparing vigabatrin and hydrocortisone in infantile spasms due to tuberous sclerosis.

Vigabatrin has been shown to be efficient in infants with infantile spasms and tuberous sclerosis, in open studies. In order to compare vigabatrin to oral steroids, a prospective randomized multicenter study was implemented using both drugs as monotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with infantile spasms and tuberous sclerosis. Eleven infants received vigabatrin (150 mg/kg per day) and 11 hydrocortisone (15 mg/kg per day) for 1 month. Spasm free patients continued vigabatrin or progressively stopped hydrocortisone in 1 month, non-responders were crossed to the other drug for a new 2 month-period. All vigabatrin patients (11/11) were spasm-free versus 5/11 hydrocortisone infants (P < 0.01). Seven patients were crossed to vigabatrin (six for inefficacy, one for adverse events) and became also totally controlled. Mean time to disappearance of infantile spasms was 3.5 days on vigabatrin versus 13 days on hydrocortisone (P < 0.01). Five patients exhibited side effects on vigabatrin but nine on hydrocortisone (P = 0.006). Vigabatrin should therefore be considered as the first choice treatment for infantile spasms due to tuberous sclerosis.

Anticonvulsants↗

Evidence for both in vivo and in vitro interaction between vigabatrin and alanine transaminase.

AIMS: Decreases in plasma alanine transaminase (ALA-T) activity of 20-100% have been reported following the use of vigabatrin (Sabril) in patients with uncontrolled epilepsy. This effect has a potential clinical significance as it may mask signs of early, underlying hepatic disease. It is particularly significant in a patient population known to have a higher than average risk of hepatotoxicity due to treatment with other anti-epilepsy drugs or to an independent, but concomitant, disease process. Vigabatrin is a highly specific enzyme antagonist. There is an almost 1000-fold difference between its activity against gamma-amino butyric acid aminotransaminase and ALA-T. However, some activity against other transaminases is not unexpected, and it, is important to determine the degree of vigabatrin's effect against ALA-T in man. METHODS: Two in vitro experiments, using serum samples spiked with vigabatrin, confirmed the presence of an interaction between vigabatrin and ALA-T, and formed the basis for the design of a study in five healthy male volunteers, in whom serum ALA-T activity was measured before and after a single dose of 1.5 g of vigabatrin. RESULTS: Serial sampling confirmed the presence of an in vivo interaction between vigabatrin and ALA-T, causing an inhibition of enzyme activity of 30-40%. A further 20% reduction was found in vitro in samples taken at the time of the peak plasma vigabatrin concentration after they had been stored for 6 h. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical significance of these findings is that the levels of ALA-T activity determined in patients receiving vigabatrin may be inaccurate. The "real' values must be assumed to be higher than those reported after routine testing. To obtain the most relistic measurement of ALA-T activity in patiets, samples should be taken at the times of trough plasma concentration and processed as soon as possible afterwards. Samples stored for any length of time at or above room temperature may also give even more false results.

Adult↗

Effects of vigabatrin on partial seizures and cognitive function.

Forty five patients with refractory partial seizures were studied in a prospective, randomised, placebo controlled, add on, parallel group, double blind trial of the new antiepileptic drug vigabatrin (1.5 g twice daily) followed by open treatment. Seizure frequency was monitored throughout an eight week baseline, 20 weeks double blind, and up to 18 months of open vigabatrin treatment. Cognitive function, including measures of memory and concentration, mood, and behaviour were assessed at baseline and again during the 20th week of treatment. Vigabatrin was associated with a significant reduction in a measure of motor speed and overall score on a design learning test in the first 20 weeks of treatment. In comparison with the baseline period, vigabatrin treatment was associated with a significant reduction in median complex partial seizure frequency four to 12 and 12 to 20 weeks after commencing vigabatrin (-66% and -69% in the vigabatrin group, +50% and +25% in the placebo group). Ten of 20 patients on vigabatrin and four of 23 on placebo showed a > 50% reduction in complex partial seizure frequency in the last eight weeks of double blind treatment. At least 60% of responders had maintained the response to vigabatrin when assessed during the open phase of the trial at 44 weeks. Two patients discontinued vigabatrin because of depression, which resolved on drug withdrawal.

Adolescent↗

Vigabatrin, a gabaergic antiepileptic drug, causes concentric visual field defects.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a causal link between vigabatrin treatment and concentric visual field defects and to evaluate the prevalence of these visual field constrictions. BACKGROUND: While the GABAergic antiepileptic drug (AED) vigabatrin was being clinically developed, only rare cases (less than 1:1000) of symptomatic visual field constriction and retinal disorders were reported. During 1997 to 1998, concentric visual field constrictions were described in case reports of mostly drug-resistant epilepsy patients receiving vigabatrin concurrently with other AEDs. METHODS: Ophthalmologic tests including Goldmann perimetry were performed on 32 adult patients on long-term successful vigabatrin monotherapy (treatment duration 29 to 119 months) and on 18 patients on carbamazepine monotherapy (treatment duration 32 to 108 months). Eighteen healthy adults served as controls. RESULTS: None of the patients complained about vision problems when asked to participate into the study. Thirteen out of the 32 (40%) epilepsy patients treated with vigabatrin monotherapy had concentrically constricted visual fields (9% severely, 31% mildly constricted), whereas none of the carbamazepine monotherapy patients or normal controls presented with a visual field defect (chi-square test, p = 0.0001). The extents of the visual fields were significantly constricted in vigabatrin group as compared with the visual fields of the patients in carbamazepine group or healthy controls (analysis of variance, Scheffe F-test, significant at 99%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of vigabatrin seems to increase the risk of a unique and specific pattern of bilateral, mainly asymptomatic visual field constriction. This risk should be considered when using vigabatrin. Visual field testing should also be performed before treatment and during routine follow-up for patients on vigabatrin.

Adolescent↗

Vigabatrin: a novel therapy for seizure disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and adverse effects of vigabatrin and its role in the management of seizure disorders. METHODS: A MEDLINE search of English-language literature from January 1993 through January 1999 was conducted using vigabatrin as a search term to identify pertinent studies and review articles. Additional studies were identified from the bibliographies of reviewed literature. The manufacturer provided postmarketing surveillance data. Priority was given to randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. FINDINGS: Vigabatrin is a selective and irreversible inhibitor of gamma-aminobutyric acid transaminase. In controlled clinical trials of vigabatrin add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled partial seizures, 24-67% of patients achieved a < or =50% reduction in seizure frequency. Data from two comparative trials with carbamazepine monotherapy indicate that vigabatrin monotherapy reduces the frequency of partial seizures in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Vigabatrin also controls infantile spasms, particularly those associated with tuberous sclerosis. Vigabatrin is more effective in patients with partial seizures than in those with generalized seizures. The drug is generally well tolerated. Headache and drowsiness were the most common adverse effects observed in controlled clinical trials; visual field defects, psychiatric reactions, and hyperactivity also have been reported. There are no known clinically significant drug interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Vigabatrin improves seizure control as add-on therapy for refractory partial seizures and may produce therapeutic benefits in the treatment of infantile spasms. Vigabatrin is generally well tolerated, with a convenient administration schedule, a lack of known significant drug interactions, and no need for routine monitoring of plasma concentrations.

Adult↗

Influence of vigabatrin, a novel antiepileptic drug, on the anticonvulsant activity of conventional antiepileptics in pentetrazole-induced seizures in mice.

Vigabatrin is a novel antiepileptic drug, which increases GABA levels by irreversible inhibition of GABA-aminotransferase. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of vigabatrin on the anticonvulsant activity of valproate, ethosuximide and clonazepam against pentetrazole-induced seizures in mice. In addition, the effects of antiepileptic drugs alone or in combination with vigabatrin were studied on motor performance and long-term memory. Chemical seizures were induced by subcutaneous injection of pentetrazole at its CD(97) and defined as a clonus of the whole body with an accompanying loss of righting reflex, lasting for over 3 s. Vigabatrin inhibited the clonic pentetrazole-induced seizures and ED(30) of the drug was 879 mg/kg. Vigabatrin (at the subthreshold dose of 250 mg/kg) potentiated the protective activity of ethosuximide, reducing its ED(30) from 142 to 95 mg/kg against clonic seizures induced by pentetrazole, but simultaneously elevated its plasma level. The protective activity of valproate and clonazepam remained almost unchanged. However, vigabatrin (250 mg/kg) decreased TD(30) (50% toxic dose - corresponding to the impairment of motor coordination in 50% of the animals) of ethosuximide and clonazepam from 549 and 3.84 to 460 and 1.1 mg/kg, respectively, in the chimney test. Vigabatrin (250 mg/kg) did not influence TD(30) value of valproate in this test. Vigabatrin (at the dose of 250 mg/kg) did not impair long-term memory in combination with antiepileptics. Potentiation of the ethosuximide's protective activity was apparently due to a pharmacokinetic interaction. Consequently, no pharmacodynamic interactions between vigabatrin and the studied conventional antiepileptic drugs were evident.

Animals↗