Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Thermodilution”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

[Cardiac output determination with transpulmonary thermodilution. An alternative to pulmonary catheterization?].

UNLABELLED: Cardiac output measurements are often helpful in the management of critically ill patients and high risk-patients. In this study an alternative technique for measurement of cardiac output by the transpulmonary indicator dilution technique (TPID) was evaluated in comparison to conventional thermodilution using a pulmonary artery catheter. With TPID, a thermistor-tipped catheter (the smallest available is 1.3 F) is placed in the aorta via a femoral artery introducer. Thus, TPID can also be used in very small children in whom placement of a pulmonary artery catheter may be difficult or even impossible. In principle, TPID is less invasive since the possible complications of the pulmonary catheters are avoided. We investigated the accuracy and reproducibility of transpulmonary thermodilution in patients over a broad range in age and body surface. METHODS: Following approval by the ethics committee and written consent, the data were obtained from 21 patients without a circulatory shunt undergoing diagnostic heart catheterization. The patients were between 0.5 and 25.2 years old, their body surface between 0.35 and 1.89 m2. Measurements were performed in duplicate with bolus injections of ice-cold normal saline (0.15 ml/kg), randomly spread over the respiratory cycle. In total 48 thermodilution curves were measured simultaneously in the pulmonary artery and in the aorta. Thermodilution curves were monoexponentially extrapolated for elimination of recirculation and cardiac output was calculated with a standard Stewart Hamilton procedure. RESULTS: The amplitude of the typical arterial thermodilution curve shows a smaller and more delayed course than the pulmonary artery thermodilution curve. There was a very good correlation between the values found by pulmonary and TPID cardiac output measurements (R = 0.968). There was a slightly smaller cardiac output value measured by the TPID (Bias = -4.7 +/- 1.5% sem) The reproducibility of duplicate measurements with the two methods were nearly the same, the standard deviation of the difference was 10.9% for the pulmonary thermodilution method and 11.7% for TPID. DISCUSSION. TPID gives an alternative technique for measurement of cardiac output. We showed over a broad range in age and body surface a very good correlation with thermodilution measurements in the pulmonary artery. The slightly smaller values for TPID are explained by early recirculation, for clinical purposes the difference is negligible. However, the reproducibility of a method is clinically very important. Both methods showed in duplicate measurements basically the same reproducibility. The disadvantage of TPID in being more sensitive to baseline alteration is counterbalanced by less respiratory variability in comparison to the conventional thermodilution technique. However, by increasing the amount of injected indicator (i.e., 0.2 ml/kg approximately equal to 15 ml in an adult) it is possible to reduce the effect of baseline alteration. By using fiberoptic catheters it is even possible to use TPID as double-indicator dilution technique to measure intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) and extravascular lung water (EVLW). We conclude that in many patients TPID might be an attractive, less invasive and reliable alternative to conventional cardiac output measurement by pulmonary artery catheter.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Relationship between bioimpedance, thermodilution, and ventriculographic measurements in experimental congestive heart failure.

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION - Bioimpedance cardiography has been suggested as a non-invasive means to monitor cardiac function but has not been tested in cases of severe ventricular dysfunction. This study compared thermodilution stroke volume, ventriculographic left ventricular ejection fraction, bioimpedance stroke volume, and the maximum first derivative of the bioimpedance signal dZ/dtmax, during the development of experimental congestive heart failure. DESIGN - Simultaneous thermodilution stroke volume, ventriculography, and bioimpedance measurements were serially measured in pigs following acute pacing, and after 1, 2, and 3 weeks of tachycardia. Thermodilution stroke volume measurements were obtained by positioning a thermistor tipped catheter into the pulmonary artery and integrating the thermodilution curve with respect to heart rate. Left ventricular stroke volume and ejection fractions were measured from single plane ventriculograms using the area-length method. Using a series of electrodes positioned on the thoracic segment and a low level current (2.5 ma), the bioimpedance waveform was recorded and stroke volume and dZ/dtmax computed. SUBJECTS - The subjects were eight pigs (23-30 kg) with developing ventricular dysfunction due to chronic rapid atrial pacing (240 beats.min-1) and four controls. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS - Left ventricular ejection fraction decreased significantly from acutely paced values following 7 d tachycardia [60(SEM 1)% v 41(3)% respectively, p less than 0.01] and continued to decline with longer durations of tachycardia. A significant correlation was observed between ejection fraction and dZ/dtmax (r = 0.74, n = 32). Thermodilution and bioimpedance stroke volumes fell significantly from acutely paced values after week 2 of tachycardia [thermodilution: 13.8(0.9) v 8.5(1.4) ml; bioimpedance: 13.6(1.1) v 11.2(1.5) ml respectively, p less than 0.05] and were highly correlated throughout the study period (r = 0.90, n = 32). However, bioimpedance overestimated thermodilution values at week 2 (p less than 0.05) and at week 3 of tachycardia [thermodilution: 8.4(0.8) ml v bioimpedance: 9.6(1.0) ml, NS]. CONCLUSION - In a tachycardia induced model of heart failure, bioimpedance was significantly correlated with thermodilution stroke volume. The peak first derivative of the bioimpedance signal dZ/dtmax may provide a non-invasive index of ventricular pump performance. While these results are promising, further studies are required to evaluate the diagnostic value of bioimpedance cardiography in the clinical setting.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Measurement of cardiac output by transesophageal echocardiography in mechanically ventilated patients. Comparison with thermodilution.

OBJECTIVE: The determination of basal cardiac output (CO) and of its variations during different therapeutic interventions liable to increase or decrease it in mechanically ventilated patients using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). DESIGN: To compare CO measurements simultaneously obtained by transmitral single-plane TEE and thermodilution. SETTING: Medical intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Twenty-two consecutive mechanically ventilated patients hospitalized for various medical conditions were included. INTERVENTIONS: The comparisons between transmitral single-plane TEE and thermodilution measurements were made at baseline and after different therapeutic interventions affecting CO (fluids or dobutamine infusion or positive end-expiratory pressure titration). MEASUREMENTS: Seventy-four measurements were obtained. Cardiac output using TEE was the product of the mitral valve area, the time-velocity integral of flow at the same site and the heart rate. RESULTS: A significant correlation was observed between thermodilution and TEE measurements of CO (n = 74, r = 0.78, p < 0.001) despite wide limits of agreement (mean +/- 2SD = -0.3 +/- 3.1 l/min). Thermodilution and TEE CO determinations both had significant inverse correlation with the arterial-venous oxygen content difference in ten consecutive patients (r = 0.77, p < 0.01 and r = 0.71, p < 0.01, respectively). The correlation between variations of CO greater than 20% obtained by thermodilution and TEE was significant (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). The operative characteristics implied the ability of TEE to predict significant variations of thermodilution CO (sensitivity 85% and negative predictive values 86%). Moreover, arterial-venous oxygen content difference changes of 5% or more were better detected using TEE than thermodilution. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that although transesophageal CO measurements cannot replace thermodilution ones, the determination of CO variations obtained using TEE may be useful in the management of critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. This technique may make it possible to monitor hemodynamics during initial therapeutic interventions in those patients in whom right heart catheterization cannot be performed immediately.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

A comparison of thermodilution and pulsed Doppler cardiac output measurement in critically ill children.

To evaluate the pulsed Doppler cardiac output method as a noninvasive means for determining cardiac output in critically ill children, we performed paired pulsed Doppler and thermodilution cardiac output determinations in 17 critically ill children. Commercially available equipment, specifically designed for this purpose, was employed. Forty paired thermodilution and pulsed Doppler determinations were made. There was a significant correlation between the two measurements (pulsed Doppler = 0.84 thermodilution + 0.39; r = 0.79, p less than 0.01). The ranges of thermodilution measurements (1.02 to 6.26 L/min; median 2.77 L/min) and pulsed Doppler measurements (1.13 to 6.35 L/min; median 2.57 L/min) were not different (p = 0.25). However, differences between individual paired thermodilution and pulsed Doppler measurements were large (-3.13 to 2.03 L/min; median 0.12 L/min), and the percentage difference between individual paired thermodilution and pulsed Doppler measurements ranged from 0.41% to 102.5% (median 12.7%). A discrepancy of 15% or more between thermodilution and pulsed Doppler was encountered in 18 (45%) of 40 of paired measurements (95% confidence interval: 29% to 61%), and one fourth of the paired measurements differed by more than 25%. We conclude that, as employed in this study, pulsed Doppler cardiac output determination is not sufficiently representative of the thermodilution output to be employed for hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement: a comparison with thermodilution.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of cardiac output measurements obtained by lithium dilution and thermodilution. DESIGN: Case series, observational study. SETTING: High-dependency postoperative unit and intensive care unit of a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Forty patients were studied. Thirty-four patients had undergoing heart surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass within the previous 2 days; the diagnoses in the other patients were myocardial infarct (n = 2), septicemia (n = 2), adult respiratory distress syndrome, and pericardectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Cardiac output was measured five times in each patient, using lithium dilution (single measurement) and bolus thermodilution (series of three to six measurements according to standard clinical practice, taking the average of the closest three). In a subgroup of 14 patients, cardiac output was also measured using "continuous thermodilution." MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Comparing lithium dilution with bolus thermodilution, the mean of the differences (lithium dilution-thermodilution) was -0.25 +/- 0.46 [SD] L/min. Linear regression analysis gave y = 0.31 + 0.89x (r2 = .94) for lithium dilution vs. thermodilution. CONCLUSIONS: The overall agreement between the two methods was good. The variability of the thermodilution measurements was greater than that of the lithium dilution measurements. The lithium dilution method is at least as accurate as bolus thermodilution and, since pulmonary artery catheterization is not needed, it has the advantages of being safe and quick to perform.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Validation of cardiac output measurements with noninvasive Doppler echocardiography by thermodilution and Fick methods in newborn piglets.

Since cardiac output measured by the noninvasive pulsed Doppler technique has not been well correlated to results from the invasive thermodilution or Fick methods in neonates, the three methods were evaluated in 6 sedated newborn piglets (age < or = 7 days, weight 1.5 +/- 0.7 kg) in room air and after 10 min of hypoxia. Doppler velocities were measured in the ascending aorta, and the aortic root diameter was measured in early diastole. A Swan-Ganz catheter in the left pulmonary artery sampled mixed venous blood for central venous O2 content and measured cardiac output by thermodilution. Oxygen consumption was measured by the open-circuit technique and used to determine cardiac output by the Fick method. In room air, values obtained by pulsed Doppler, thermodilution and Fick methods (0.270 +/- 0.05, 0.246 +/- 0.05 and 0.241 +/- 0.05 liters/kg/min, respectively) were similar, with a correlation coefficient (r) between Doppler and thermodilution values of 0.89, Doppler and Fick values of 0.82 and thermodilution and Fick values of 0.88. Although hypoxia sometimes produced larger differences between paired values, correlation coefficients remained high (Doppler echocardiography vs. thermodilution, r = 0.96; Doppler vs. Fick methods, r = 0.92; thermodilution vs. Fick method, r = 0.95). The mean +/- SD of the percent difference between values obtained by Doppler echocardiography and thermodilution was 4.2 +/- 14.4% in room air and 12.8 +/- 14.4% in hypoxia, whereas differences in values obtained by Doppler and Fick methods was 6 +/- 14.9% in room air and 14.7 +/- 8.5% with hypoxia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Transtracheal Doppler cardiac output monitoring: comparison to thermodilution during noncardiac surgery.

The validity of transtracheal Doppler (TTD) cardiac output (CO) monitoring during noncardiac surgery has not been established. A prospective evaluation was undertaken in 30 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery to assess the agreement between TTD and thermodilution measurements of CO. Linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) techniques were employed to evaluate the accuracy, reliability, and trending capability of TTD monitoring. A total of 250 simultaneous TTD and thermodilution CO values were compared. TTD and thermodilution CO measurements were highly correlated (P < 0.005, r = 0.84) and Bland-Altman analysis revealed a small systematic underestimation of thermodilution CO (mean bias = -0.25 L/min) with a SD of the bias of 0.88 L/min and a mean percent error of 12.4%. TTD performed particularly well in patients in whom the Doppler signal was stable throughout surgery and required minimal manipulation. In these patients, linear regression yielded the relation TTD CO = 0.96 thermodilution CO + 0.15 with a correlation coefficient r = 0.92. Mean percent error was 10.0% with a mean bias of -0.02 L/min and a SD of the bias of 0.58 L/min. The ability of TTD to track directional changes in thermodilution CO was evaluated by regression analysis and a ROC plot. Changes in TTD CO were highly correlated to changes in thermodilution CO (r = 0.81). ROC plots showed that changes in TTD CO reliably identified large (greater than 15%) changes in thermodilution CO with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 87%. Clinical experience with the TTD device is needed to obtain accurate measurements.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1992

In vitro validation of a thermodilution right ventricular ejection fraction method.

A thermodilution catheter and computer system has been developed to measure right ventricular ejection fraction and volumes. To evaluate the performance of this method, the thermodilution system was evaluated in an in vitro pulsatile flow model. Thermodilution measurements of ejection fraction (EF), cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV) were compared with known values in a pulsatile flow bench. Thermodilution EF measurements correlated very well with the pulsatile flow model (r2 = 0.95, m [slope] = 0.85, SEE = 4.0 EFU). Thermodilution CO and SV were highly predictive of actual pulsatile flow (r2 = 0.99, m = 0.99, SEE = 187 ml/min and r2 = 0.98, m = 0.96, SEE = 2.5 ml, respectively). Thermodilution end-diastolic and end-systolic volume measurements resulted in low mean eror, -1.8% and 0.6%, respectively. The standard deviations of the error for EDV and ESV were 11.0% and 16.4%. The thermodilution measurements were repeatable, with CO, SV, and EF coefficients of variation of 3.2%, 3.3%, and 4.7%, respectively. EDV and ESV were slightly more variable, with coefficients of variation of 5.5% and 7.2%, respectively.

Cardiac Catheterization↗
PubMed2001

Continuous cardiac output measurements do not agree with conventional bolus thermodilution cardiac output determination.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of two different continuous cardiac output monitoring systems based on the thermodilution principle in critically ill patients. METHODS: Nineteen cardiac surgical patients were randomly assigned to continuous cardiac output monitoring using one of the two systems under study (group I, IntelliCath(TM) catheter, n=9; group II, Opti-Q(TM) catheter, n=10). Each patient was studied over a period of three hours. Conventional bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements were carried out every 15 min leading to 13 measurements in each patient. The continuous cardiac output values were compared with the bolus thermodilution measurements. Bias (mean difference between continuous and bolus thermodilution) and precision (SD of differences) were calculated as a measure of agreement between the respective continuous method and conventional bolus thermodilution. RESULTS: The range of measured cardiac outputs was 3.8-15.4 L*min(-1) (IntelliCath(TM)) and 3.5-8.3 L*min(-1) (OptiQ(TM)). Bias and precision was 0.06 +/- 0.76 L*min(-1) (IntelliCath(TM)) and -0.04 +/- 0.74 L*min(-1) (OptiQ(TM)), respectively. There was no difference in bias between the two systems (P=0.38). +/- 2 SD of the differences (i.e., 95% of the differences) did not fall within the predetermined limits of agreement of +/- 0.5 L*min(-1). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference between the two systems regarding the agreement with conventional bolus thermodilution as the standard. A discrepancy between bolus and continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurement techniques above the clinically acceptable limits suggest that they are not interchangeable.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Underestimation of cardiac output by thermodilution in patients with tricuspid regurgitation.

INTRODUCTION: This study was done to assess the accuracy and reliability of the thermodilution technique in measuring cardiac output in patients with tricuspid regurgitation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 30 subjects (17 men, 13 women, aged 50 +/- 14 [mean +/- SD] years), cardiac output was measured in close temporal proximity by thermodilution as well as Fick or indocyanine green dye, after which the presence and severity of tricuspid regurgitation were assessed by contrast right ventriculography or pulsed Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: In the 13 patients without tricuspid regurgitation, there was excellent agreement between the results of thermodilution and Fick or indocyanine green dye cardiac output determinations (4.95 +/- 1.19 liters/minute by thermodilution, 4.90 +/- 1.11 liters/minute by Fick or indocyanine green dye; NS). In contrast, in the 17 patients with tricuspid regurgitation, the results of thermodilution were consistently lower than those of Fick or indocyanine green dye (4.22 +/- 1.45 liters/minute by thermodilution, 4.99 +/- 1.67 liters/minute by Fick or indocyanine green dye; p less than 0.001). CONCLUSION: Thus, the thermodilution technique of measuring cardiac output is inaccurate in patients with tricuspid regurgitation, yielding results that are consistently lower than the actual outputs.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Near continuous cardiac output by thermodilution.

A new thermodilution method for frequent (near continuous) estimation of cardiac output, without manual injection of fluid into the blood, was tested. The method utilizes a pulmonary artery catheter equipped with a fluid filled heat exchanger. The technique is based on cyclic cooling of the blood in the right atrium and measurement of the temperature changes in the pulmonary artery. Using this technique, a new estimate of cardiac output can be obtained every 32 s. Cardiac output estimates, obtained for a running mean of three measurements with this method, were compared to the mean of three conventional thermodilution measurements. The measurements were obtained during short periods of stable respiration and circulation. In six pigs, we made 46 paired measurements of conventional thermodilution (TD) and near continuous (TDc) thermodilution. The cardiac output (COTD) ranged from 2.4-13.7 l/min (mean 5.4 l/min). The best linear fit through the paired data points was COTDc = -0.57 + 1.01 COTD. The mean difference between the methods was -0.50 l/min (S.D. = 0.39). The mean coefficient of variation of repeated measurements with the near continuous thermodilution was 3.6%. Considering changes of more than 0.25 l/min to be significant, all changes in cardiac output measured by conventional thermodilution were followed by the running mean of three near continuous thermodilution estimates. This study demonstrates the feasibility of the new method to monitor cardiac output, and to detect all changes greater than 0.25 l/min.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Estimation of cerebral blood flow at bedside by continuous jugular thermodilution.

The Kety-Schmidt technique can be regarded as the reference method for the measurement of cerebral blood flow (CBF). However, the method is somewhat cumbersome for routine use in the intensive care unit (ICU) at the beside. The continuous thermodilution technique developed many years ago for the measurement of coronary sinus blood flow can be applied for the measurement of jugular blood flow (JBF). However, the measurement of JBF by thermodilution has never been validated using the Kety-Schmidt reference method. We first validate the continuous thermodilution in vitro by comparison with a volumetric flow. The thermodilution method is accurate for flows between 50 and 900 ml min-1 with a mean difference volumetric-thermodilution flow of -1 +/- 18 ml min-1 (mean +/- SD), and precise with a coefficient of variability ranging between 1.21% and 2.50%. In vivo accuracy was assessed by comparing in 15 comatose patients CBF measured using the Kety-Schmidt (CBFKS) method and estimated from JBF measured by thermodilution (CBFTH) at four levels of arterial PaCO2 (25, 30, 35, and 40 mm Hg). The mean difference CBFKS-CBFTH is -0.9 +/- 3.6 ml min-1 100 g-1. In vivo precision of the method was good, with a coefficient of variability of 4.1% in mean. We conclude that jugular continuous thermodilution technique is a reliable method for estimating CBF at the bedside. This technique allows repeated measurements jugular bulb blood sampling for brain metabolic studies.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

An alternative thermodilution method to measure cardiac output in a rat model of stagnant hypoxia.

Rats are often used to study hemodynamics in animal research. We have established an alternative method to measure cardiac output in a conscious rat using a thermodilution technique via a left ventricular injection. The validity of this method was evaluated in conscious rats and compared with the results obtained using the radiolabeled microspheres (reference sample method). Using 20 male Sprague-Dawley rats, a baseline cardiac index was measured by thermodilution to determine the baseline cardiac index and to evaluate between animal variability. The baseline cardiac index was compared to the reference sample method with 6 rats. Following baseline measurements, an intra-atrial balloon was inflated in a stepwise manner to create 2 to 3 different cardiac outputs, and the cardiac index was computed. For each measurement, the cardiac index was first measured by thermodilution and immediately followed by the reference sample method. A total of 21 measurements were obtained, and the results were analyzed by a Bland-Altman plot and the correlation coefficient was calculated. Although the agreement between the two methods was poor, both methods had a good correlation (r2 = 0.59). With the thermodilution technique, we demonstrated a small coefficient of variation in each measurement, with a low intra-animal and inter-animal variability. As there is no gold standard method to measure cardiac output in rats, we believe that left ventricular thermodilution is a reliable method, and overcomes several technical difficulties such as heat loss, one of the significant limitations of the conventional thermodilution method (via right atrial injection). This new thermodilution technique (via the left ventricle) is therefore an attractive alternative method to measure cardiac output in rats.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Measurement of portal blood and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt flow with use of a retrograde thermodilutional catheter.

PURPOSE: Direct blood flow measurement in the portal vein (PV) and in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) holds potential as a means of optimizing shunt creation and predicting outcomes. A retrograde thermodilutional flow measurement catheter was recently designed. The purpose of this study was to validate and optimize the technique of blood flow measurement in the PV with use of this catheter in a swine model of TIPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six domestic swine underwent TIPS creation. At day 14, shunts were catheterized for venography and portal blood flow measurement with use of thermodilutional catheters. Simultaneous flow measurements were made with use of the thermodilutional and perivascular methods at the same anatomic location within the PV. To test reproducibility of the flow measurement, repeated measurements were performed in the PV and shunt. RESULTS: Fifty-five measurements of PV blood flow with the thermodilutional catheter and perivascular probe were made in five animals. Perivascular probe placement was unsuccessful in one animal. There was high correlation between the thermodilutional and perivascular measurements (r(2) = 0.96; Q(periv) = 0.80 . Q(therm) + 147 mL/min; n = 55; range, 205-1541 mL/min). The difference between two consecutive thermodilutional measurements and their mean was less than 50 mL/min in 72% of measurements and less than 100 mL/min in 94% of measurements (N = 85 pairs). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of PV blood flow with use of a retrograde thermodilutional catheter system yields reliable and reproducible results. This catheter system holds promising utility as a device for measuring flow within TIPS and the PV.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Lack of agreement between thermodilution and fick cardiac output in critically ill patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: s: Individual comparison of cardiac output via intermittent thermodilution and Fick technique over a wide range of cardiac outputs. DESIGN: Prospective clinical investigation. SETTING: Multidisciplinary ICUs of two teaching hospitals in Vancouver, British Columbia. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen critically ill patients who had pulmonary and systemic arterial catheters and in whom active support was being withdrawn. INTERVENTIONS: Measurement of thermodilution cardiac output and calculation of Fick cardiac output while support was withdrawn. Active support was withdrawn in a three-step process: removal of vasopressors followed by decrease in fraction of inspired oxygen to 0.21, and finally removal of mechanical ventilation. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Simultaneous Fick and thermodilution cardiac outputs were obtained over a wide range. Fick calculated cardiac outputs were obtained using the Fick equation with oxygen uptake (O(2)) being measured with indirect calorimetry. O(2) determinations were made using five measurements over 5 min, with the mean being used for subsequent analysis. Thermodilution cardiac outputs were determined by the mean of five measurements, with the first being discarded. Coefficient of variation was calculated for the O(2) and thermodilution cardiac outputs. One hundred thirty-six simultaneous cardiac outputs were obtained in 18 patients with a mean APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) II score of 25.5. The range of cardiac outputs was 1.39 to 16.95 L/min. Linear regression analysis found a good correlation of the data sets, with an R of 0.85. Bias and precision calculations found a bias of - 0.17 L/min with the upper and lower limits of agreement being 2.96 L/min and - 3.30 L/min, respectively. In patients with high cardiac outputs (> 7 L/min), the bias was - 1.90 with the limits of agreement being 1.87 L/min and - 5.67 L/min. The coefficient of variation for O(2) was 4.6% and for thermodilution cardiac output was 7.75%. CONCLUSIONS: There was good consistency of each of the measurements with a low coefficient of variation. The bias for the whole group was small, but the limits of agreement extended into a clinically relevant area, resulting in a lack of agreement. In patients with high cardiac outputs, the Fick tended to consistently produce higher cardiac outputs compared to thermodilution, suggesting a systematic error.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac output can be determined by using a variety of methods. OBJECTIVES: To determine the precision and bias between 3 methods for determining cardiac output: bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method. METHODS: Cardiac output was determined by using bioimpedance via neck and thorax patches and thermodilution via pulmonary artery catheter in 46 patients in the intensive care unit. A subset of 15 patients also had cardiac output determined by using the Fick method. RESULTS: Mean (SD) cardiac output in all patients was 6.3 (2.2) L/min by thermodilution and 5.6 (2.0) L/min by bioimpedance. In the 15 patients in whom all 3 methods were used, mean cardiac output was 6.0 (1.7) L/min by thermodilution, 5.3 (1.7) L/min by bioimpedance, and 8.6 (4.5) L/min by the Fick method. Bias and precision (mean difference +/- 2 SDs) were 0.7 +/- 2.9 L/min between thermodilution and bioimpedance, 1.7 +/- 3.8 L/min between the Fick method and thermodilution, and 2.4 +/- 4.7 L/min between the Fick method and bioimpedance. CONCLUSION: Bioimpedance, thermodilution, and Fick determinations of cardiac outputs are not interchangeable in a heterogeneous population of critically ill patients.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Errors in the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution.

Cardiac output (CO) determination by thermodilution, which was introduced by Fegler in 1954, has gained wide acceptance in clinical medicine and animal experiments because it has several advantages over other methods with respect to simplicity, accuracy, reproducibility, repeated measurements at short intervals, and because there is no need for blood withdrawal. However, errors in determination of CO by thermodilution may be introduced by technical factors and the patients' pathological conditions. The current review summarizes these issues and provides our recommendations, based on the medical literature published between 1954-1992. To obtain more reproducible and accurate CO values by thermodilution, one should make several determinations (1) by using 10 ml injectate at room temperature for adults and 0.15 ml.kg-1 injectate for infants and children; (2) at evenly spaced intervals of the ventilation cycle; (3) when rapid intravenous fluid administration is discontinued; (4) by observing thermodilution curves so that baseline pulmonary artery temperature drift or the existence of intra- and extracardiac shunts are noticed. Finally, CO determination by thermodilution may be unreliable or impossible in patients with low CO states and tricuspid or pulmonary regurgitation. Since non-invasive CO monitoring has not replaced CO determination by thermodilution, intimate knowledge of this method is crucial for anaesthetists to prevent errors in the management of patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Cardiac output estimation by visual inspection vs thermodilution during cardiac surgery.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were: 1) to compare the estimated cardiac output (CO) by visual inspection with objective measurements by thermodilution: 2) to compare the estimated systemic vascular resistance (SVR) with objective measurements by thermodilution; and 3) to assess whether management of the patient, based on subjective values, would have differed from the management of the patient based on the objective values. METHODS: A non-randomized, prospective, blinded study was conducted at a tertiary care university hospital. Following institutional ethics approval, 35 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) monitoring, were studied. Prior to the measurement of CO by thermodilution, but after separation from cardiac pulmonary bypass, the CO and SVR were estimated by the anaesthetist and the surgeon. Bland and Altman's method was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Surgeons' estimates of CO were comparable with the objectively measured thermodilution measures: in each case (100%), the difference between the subjective estimate and the objective measurement was less than two standard deviations from the mean difference of the two methods. Anaesthetists' estimates, by visual inspection, were also comparable with the objectively measured thermodilution values; 94.6% of cases. The surgeons' and anaesthetists' estimates of SVR were also comparable with the thermodilution measures in all cases. Management based on subjective values would have differed from those based on objective values in only 8.6% of cases. CONCLUSION: An advantage of cardiac surgery is the ability to observe the heart and assess its performance visually. This study demonstrated that estimates of CO and SVR by clinical observation are comparable with the pulmonary artery catheter's derived values.

Aged↗