Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Temazepam”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Acute pharmacological effects of temazepam, diphenhydramine, and valerian in healthy elderly subjects.

Elderly insomniacs are often treated pharmacologically with benzodiazepines, antihistamines, or natural products. A double-blind, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled study was performed to assess the comparative pharmacodynamics of single doses of temazepam (15 and 30 mg), diphenhydramine (50 and 75 mg), and valerian (400 and 800 mg) in 14 healthy elderly volunteers (mean age, 71.6 years; range, 65-89). Assessments were made at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours postdosing with use of validated measures of subjective sedation and mood (visual analogue scales, Tufts University Benzodiazepine scale) and psychomotor performance (manual tracking and digit symbol substitution tests). Temazepam had dose-dependent effects on sedation and psychomotor ability with a distinct time course. Temazepam 30 mg had the most detrimental effect on psychomotor ability (p < 0.001 compared with all other treatments). Temazepam 30 mg and both doses of diphenhydramine elicited significantly greater sedation than placebo (p < 0.05, all), and temazepam had the greatest effect. There was no difference in sedation scores between 50 and 75 mg diphenhydramine. Sedative effects were slightly lesser with 15 mg temazepam and were not significant in comparison with placebo. Psychomotor impairment was evident after administration of 75 mg diphenhydramine in comparison with placebo on the manual tracking test (p < 0.05); this was less than the impairment with 30 mg temazepam (p < 0.001) but similar to that with 15 mg temazepam (NS). No psychomotor impairment was detected with 50 mg diphenhydramine. Valerian was not different from placebo on any measure of psychomotor performance or sedation.

Aged↗

Pharmaco-EEG, behavioural methods and blood levels in the comparison of temazepam and flunitrazepam.

In a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study, the blood levels and pharmacodynamic properties of temazepam were compared with flunitrazepam using quantitative pharmaco-EEG and psychometric methods in ten healthy volunteers. Computer-assisted spectral analysis of the EEG after three doses of temazepam (10 mg, 20 mg and 40 mg) compared with placebo showed statistically significant changes in brain function. These changes were also seen after the administration of the reference drug (flunitrazepam 2 mg) and are typical of anxiolytic sedatives. Psychometric and psychophysiological tests demonstrated significant alterations at the behavioural level, especially after higher doses of temazepam and 2 mg flunitrazepam, as expected. However, low doses or low blood levels of temazepam induced an improvement of performance in certain variables. Dose-efficacy calculations identified 2 mg flunitrazepam and 40 mg temazepam as the most CNS-effective, followed by 20 mg and 10 mg temazepam, while the least changes occurred after placebo. Time-efficacy calculations showed marked inter-drug differences. The pharmacodynamics of both drugs parallel their respective pharmacokinetics. Regression and correlation analyses between blood levels and EEG or psychometric changes revealed that beta activity and the centroid of the EEG were positively correlated with plasma levels, while alpha activity, psychometric variables and skin conductance were negatively correlated. Psychometric variables started to deteriorate above a blood level of approximately 250 ng/ml, while below this level an improvement was seen. Such (sedative) blood levels were only reached after doses higher than 10 mg temazepam. Our findings indicate that 10 mg temazepam has tranquilizing properties, while 20 mg and 40 mg doses exert, in addition, sedative sleep-inducing effects.

Administration, Oral↗

Effects of temazepam on sleep, performance, and rhythmic 6-sulphatoxymelatonin and cortisol excretion after transmeridian travel.

The effects of 20-mg doses of the short-acting benzodiazepine, temazepam, on sleep, performance and pineal, adrenal and temperature rhythms were investigated in a placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study. Ten healthy males were studied 4 d prior to flying from Sydney to London via Tokyo and Anchorage (11 time zones). Temazepam or placebo were administered at 2300 hours (local time) during the flight and for 4 d after arrival. After a 7-d recreation break in London, the subjects returned to Sydney via Moscow and Tokyo and again took five doses of temazepam or placebo. During the 5 d following their arrival in London or Sydney, the subjects collected urine, had rectal temperature monitored, performed a battery of performance tests and filled out questionnaires. Temazepam significantly improved various subjective sleep characteristics, particularly on the first few nights. Performance (choice reaction time, critical flicker fusion threshold and pencil and paper tests) was not impaired by temazepam treatment. The pineal rhythm was assessed by urinary 6-sulphatoxymelatonin excretion rate determinations. The time of peak 6-sulphatoxymelatonin excretion (acrophase) occurred progressively later each day after arrival in London and Sydney, however the rate of adjustment of the rhythm was not affected by temazepam. Similarly, the urinary cortisol and temperature rhythms adjusted to the new environments by progressive delay with no drug effect being evident. Administration of temazepam clearly had a beneficial effect on sleep and alertness following transmeridian travel, without detrimental effects on performance. There was no evidence to suggest that temazepam altered the rates of entrainment of physiological rhythms to the new environments.

Adult↗

Temazepam clearance unaltered in cirrhosis.

The kinetics of a single oral dose of the benzodiazepine hypnotic temazepam was evaluated in nine patients with biopsy-proven cirrhosis and in seven healthy controls matched for age and sex. Peak serum temazepam concentrations were reached later in cirrhotics than in controls (2.9 versus 0.6 h after dosage; p less than 0.05), indicating slower temazepam absorption in patients with cirrhosis. Temazepam volume of distribution was smaller in cirrhotics compared to controls, and elimination half-life shorter (10.6 versus 14.6 h). However, these differences were not significant. There were no significant differences between cirrhotics and controls in clearance of total temazepam (1.03 versus 1.03 ml/min/kg), clearance of unbound temazepam (27 versus 31 ml/min/kg), or free fraction in serum (3.9 versus 3.5% unbound). In two cirrhotic patients who received 20 mg of temazepam daily for 8 days, the extent of accumulation was consistent with the dosage interval relative to the elimination half-life, and was similar to the accumulation profile in healthy volunteers. Thus the onset of temazepam hypnotic activity may be delayed in cirrhotic patients, but the rate of elimination and the extent of accumulation are not altered compared to healthy persons of similar age and sex.

Administration, Oral↗

Noninteraction of temazepam and cimetidine.

The possible kinetic interaction of the hypnotic temazepam and the H2-receptor antagonist cimetidine was evaluated. Nine healthy male and female volunteers received a 30-mg oral dose of temazepam on two occasions in random sequence, separated by at least 1 week. On one occasion, temazepam was given in the otherwise drug-free state; on the other, temazepam was given with concurrent administration of cimetidine, 300 mg every 6 h. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters for temazepam in control versus cimetidine trials were: peak plasma concentration, 560 versus 498 ng/mL; time of peak concentration, 2.0 versus 2.1 h after the dose; volume of distribution, 1.30 versus 1.39 L/kg; elimination half-life, 9.9 versus 11.4 h; total clearance, 1.59 versus 1.60 mL/min/kg; free fraction of temazepam in plasma, 4.1 versus 3.8% unbound. Cimetidine has been shown to reduce the metabolic clearance of the benzodiazepines that are biotransformed by oxidative mechanisms. Temazepam, transformed by conjugation, appears unaffected by the coadministration of cimetidine.

Adult↗

Efficacy of activated charcoal versus gastric lavage half an hour after ingestion of moclobemide, temazepam, and verapamil.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of activated charcoal and gastric lavage in preventing the absorption of moclobemide, temazepam, and verapamil 30 min after drug ingestion. METHODS: In this randomized cross-over study with three phases, nine healthy volunteers received a single oral dose of 150 mg moclobemide, 10 mg temazepam, and 80 mg verapamil after an overnight fast. Thirty minutes later, they were assigned to one of the following treatments: 25 g activated charcoal as a suspension in 200 ml water, gastric lavage (10x200 ml), or 200 ml water (control). Plasma concentrations of moclobemide, temazepam, and verapamil were determined up to 24 h. RESULTS: Activated charcoal reduced the area under the plasma concentration time curve from 0 h to 24 h (AUC0-24 h) of moclobemide and temazepam by 55% (P<0.05) and by 45% (P<0.05), respectively. The AUC0-24 h of verapamil was not significantly reduced by charcoal. Gastric lavage decreased the AUC0-24 h of moclobemide by 44% (P<0.05), but had no significant effect on that of temazepam or verapamil. The peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of moclobemide, temazepam, and verapamil was reduced by 40%, 29% (P<0.05), and 16%, respectively, by activated charcoal. Gastric lavage did not significantly decrease the Cmax of any of these drugs. CONCLUSION: The absorption of moclobemide, temazepam, and verapamil can be moderately reduced by activated charcoal given 30 min after drug ingestion, while gastric lavage seems to be less effective.

Administration, Oral↗

A pharmacodynamic Markov mixed-effects model for the effect of temazepam on sleep.

BACKGROUND: A hypnogram shows how sleep travels through its various stages in the course of a night. The sleep stage changes can be quantified to study sedative drug effects. METHODS: Hypnograms from 21 patients with primary insomnia were collected during a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study of 20 mg temazepam. A separate daytime session was performed to determine the pharmacokinetics of 20 mg temazepam and its effect on saccadic eye movement and electroencephalogram. A first-order Markov model was developed to describe the probability of sleep stage changes as a function of time after drug intake and time after last sleep stage change. The influence of temazepam concentration on the probability to change sleep stage was incorporated into the model. RESULTS: Transitions between sleep stages were profoundly influenced by the time of the night and by the time since the last change of sleep stage. Temazepam reduced the time spent awake. This effect could be attributed to four mechanisms: (1) transition to "deeper" sleep was facilitated, (2) transition to "lighter" sleep was inhibited, (3) regardless of sleep stage, the transition to wake state was inhibited, and (4) return to sleep was facilitated. Daytime sensitivities to temazepam, measured with the surrogate markers saccadic peak velocity and electroencephalogram beta activity, each correlated with one of the transition probabilities influenced by temazepam. CONCLUSIONS: By the development of a Markov model for these non-ordered six categorical data, the effect of temazepam on the sleep-wake status could be interpreted in terms of known mechanisms for sleep generation and benzodiazepine pharmacology.

Adolescent↗

Temazepam, but not zolpidem, causes orthostatic hypotension in astronauts after spaceflight.

Insomnia is a common symptom, not only in the adult population but also in many astronauts. Hypnotics, such as temazepam (a benzodiazepine) and zolpidem (an imidazopyridine), are often taken to relieve insomnia. Temazepam has been shown clinically to have hemodynamic side effects, particularly in the elderly; however, the mechanism is not clear. Zolpidem does not cause hemodynamic side effects. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of different hypnotics during spaceflight might contribute significantly to the high incidence of postflight orthostatic hypotension, and to compare the findings in astronauts with clinical research. Astronauts were separated into three groups: control (n = 40), temazepam (15 or 30 mg; n = 9), and zolpidem (5 or 10 mg; n = 8). In this study, temazepam and zolpidem were only taken the night before landing. The systolic and diastolic blood pressures and heart rates of the astronauts were measured during stand tests before spaceflight and on landing day. On landing day, systolic pressure decreased significantly and heart rate increased significantly in the temazepam group, but not in the control group or in the zolpidem group. Temazepam may aggravate orthostatic hypotension after spaceflight when astronauts are hemodynamically compromised. Temazepam should not be the initial choice as a sleeping aid for astronauts. These results in astronauts may help to explain the hemodynamic side effects in the elderly who are also compromised. Zolpidem may be a better choice as a sleeping aid in these populations.

Adult↗

Lack of interaction of erythromycin with temazepam.

Erythromycin is a strong inhibitor of cytochrome P450 [CYP3A4] and has a potentially dangerous interaction with midazolam and triazolam. The possible interaction between erythromycin and a short-acting benzodiazepine, temazepam, was investigated in a double-blind, randomized crossover study. Ten healthy volunteers received 500 mg erythromycin or placebo orally three times a day for 6 days followed by a challenge dose of 20 mg temazepam. Plasma samples were collected for the determination of temazepam, oxazepam, and erythromycin, and psychomotor effects were measured during the 24 h after intake of temazepam. Erythromycin did not change the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of temazepam to a statistically significant degree. The metabolic fate of temazepam and its almost complete bioavailability explain the lack of interaction. Temazepam, unlike midazolam or triazolam, can thus be prescribed in the usual doses for patients receiving erythromycin.

Administration, Oral↗

Temazepam misuse in a group of injecting drug users.

It is well recognized that many injecting drug users are poly-drug users. The intravenous use of Temazepam has become popular recently. In response to the ease of misuse, the pharmaceutical industry produced a formulation that would be as 'resistant' as possible to injecting. The preparation is a gel-filled formulation, one proprietary name being Temazepam Gelthix. General Practitioners have been encouraged to prescribe gel-filled capsules to potential drug misusers in order to reduce the harm Temazepam can cause by its misuse. This study of 23 Temazepam injectors shows that the group still find the gel-filled preparation readily injectable. It appears to be more problematic in causing medical complications including superficial thrombophlebitis, abscesses and deep venous thrombosis. Temazepam misuse can cause drug users to become more chaotic. The study group recognize this and suggest there should be stricter control on the supply of Temazepam to drug dependents. General Practitioners, who are the main source of Temazepam prescribing, require additional training in prescribing to drug users.

Adult↗

Toward evidence-based prescribing at end of life: a comparative review of temazepam and zolpidem for the treatment of insomnia.

A comparative review of temazepam and zolpidem use in managing insomnia in the hospice patient was undertaken to determine whether treatment with temazepam is a more cost-effective approach for this patient population. A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify pertinent literature, including clinical trials and reviews that involved temazepam or zolpidem. Published data was used as background information and provided in the discussion. This retrospective analysis, conducted from June 2002 through November 2002, focused on the prescribing patterns of temazepam and zolpidem in our hospice practice setting. We examined the reasons for discontinuation of each agent, along with the frequency of therapeutic change from temazepam to zolpidem. The top 10 ICD-9 codes associated with each treatment modality were investigated to determine any prescribing patterns. A total of 4,752 participants were prescribed either temazepam or zolpidem during this six-month period. Of the 4,065 patients prescribed temazepam 9.9 percent had the agent discontinued, whereas, 13.0 percent of those taking zolpidem (n = 687) terminated therapy. Reasons for discontinuation included change in dose, incomplete efficacy, change in patient status, adverse drug reaction, cultural/social issues and "other." Analyses of prescribing patterns and the reasons for termination of each drug therapy were completed and compared with results found in the primary literature. Due to the limited financial resources available for hospice care, our goal is to provide the most clinically appropriate and cost-effective agents for hospice patients. With the lack of data pertaining to the hospice patient, physicians often are faced with challenges in deciding the most appropriate therapy. They may prefer one agent over another based on current medical opinion rather than sound clinical evidence. After review of the primary literature and the prescribing patterns in our setting, there is currently no evidence in our patient population to support that zolpidem is superior to benzodiazepines for the treatment of insomnia.

Anti-Anxiety Agents↗

Impact of melatonin, zaleplon, zopiclone, and temazepam on psychomotor performance.

INTRODUCTION: Modern military operations may require pharmaceutical methods to sustain alertness and facilitate sleep in order to maintain operational readiness. In operations with very limited sleep windows, hypnotics with very short half-lives (e.g., zaleplon, t(1/2) 1 h) are of interest, while with longer sleep opportunities, longer acting agents (e.g., zopiclone, temazepam (t(1/2) 4-6 hours) may be used. This study was designed to compare the effect of a single dose of zaleplon, zopiclone, temazepam, and melatonin on psychomotor performance and to quantify the post-ingestion time required for return to normal performance. METHOD: There were 23 subjects (9 men, 14 women), 21-53 yr of age, assessed for psychomotor performance on 2 test batteries (4 tasks) that included a sleepiness questionnaire. Psychomotor testing was conducted prior to, and for 7 h after, ingestion of a single dose of each of placebo, zaleplon 10 mg, zopiclone 7.5 mg, temazepam 15 mg, and time-released melatonin 6 mg. The experimental design was a double-blind cross-over with counter-balanced treatment order. RESULTS: Zaleplon, zopiclone, and temazepam impaired performance on all four tasks: serial reaction time (SRT), logical reasoning (LRT), serial subtraction (SST), and multitask (MT). Melatonin did not impair performance on any task. The time to recovery of normal performance for SRT during the zaleplon, zopiclone and temazepam conditions were 3.25, 6.25, and 5.25 h respectively; for LRT were 3.25, >6.25, and 4.25 h; for SST were 2.25, >6.25, and 4.25 h, and for MT were 2.25, 4.25, and 3.25 h. The recovery time to baseline subjective sleepiness levels for zaleplon, zopiclone, temazepam, and melatonin were 4.25, >6.25, 5.25, and >4.25 h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of a prolonged period of perceived sleepiness, melatonin was superior to zaleplon in causing no impact on performance. The remaining drugs listed in increasing order of performance impact duration are zaleplon, temazepam, and zopiclone.

Acetamides↗

The effects of temazepam and ethanol on human psychomotor performance.

We have studied the effects of temazepam, alone and in combination with ethanol, on psychomotor performance in six healthy men and women using a battery of five microcomputer-based tasks before and 30, 90, and 150 min after treatment. The tests were pursuit tracking, divided attention, two four-choice reaction time tests and tapping rate. The entire battery required 25 min. The subjects also reported their mood at each testing time using a computerized bipolar mood scales test. Temazepam (15 mg) plus ethanol (peak blood concentration of 11 mmol.l-1) significantly impaired divided attention, tracking, and reaction time over a 3 h period. There was significant impairment versus placebo for each drug alone on some of the tests. Plasma and urine concentrations of temazepam and temazepam glucuronide were measured, but there was no significant temporal correlation between impairment and drug or metabolite concentration in either plasma or urine. The subjects knew when they had taken ethanol, but could not discriminate temazepam from ethanol whether alone or in combination. The subjects rated their performance similarly after each of the four treatment conditions. The performance on the tracking, divided attention, and PAB reaction time tasks used in this study was impaired by a combination of temazepam and ethanol in doses which may not cause impairment when each is given alone.

Adult↗

The interactive effects of alcohol and temazepam on P300 and reaction time.

The present research investigated the separate and interactive effects of the minor tranquilizer, temazepam, and a low dose of alcohol on the amplitude and latency of P300 and on reaction time. Twenty-four participants completed four drug treatments in a repeated measures design. The four drug treatments, organised as a fully repeated 2 x 2 design, included a placebo condition, an alcohol only condition, a temazepam only condition, and an alcohol and temazepam combined condition. Event-related potentials were recorded from midline sites Fz, Cz, and Pz within an oddball paradigm. The results indicated that temazepam, with or without the presence of alcohol, reduced P300 amplitude. Alcohol, on the other hand, with or without the presence of temazepam, affected processing speed and stimulus evaluation as indexed by reaction time and P300 latency. At the low dose levels used in this experiment alcohol and temazepam appear not to interact, which suggests that they affect different aspects of processing in the central nervous system.

Adolescent↗

A study of the effects of long-term use on individual sensitivity to temazepam and lorazepam in a clinical population.

AIMS: The central effects of benzodiazepines may be attenuated after chronic use by changes in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics or both. This attenuation may be influenced by the dosing pattern and the characteristics of the user population. The objectives of this study were to evaluate drug sensitivity in long-term users of temazepam and lorazepam in a clinical population. METHODS: The sensitivity to benzodiazepine effects in chronic users (1-20 years) of lorazepam (n = 14) or temazepam (n = 13) was evaluated in comparison with age and sex matched controls. Drug sensitivity was evaluated by plasma concentration in relation to saccadic eye movement parameters, postural stability and visual analogue scales. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics of lorazepam and temazepam did not differ between patients and control subjects. Chronic users of lorazepam showed clear evidence of reduced sensitivity, indicated by lack of any pharmacodynamic difference between patients and controls at baseline, when drug concentrations were similar to the peak values attained in the control subjects after administration of 1-2.5 mg of lorazepam. In addition, there was a two- to four fold reduction in the slopes of concentration-effect plots for measures of saccadic eye movements and body sway (all; P < or = 0.01). By contrast, sensitivity in chronic users of temazepam was not different from controls. The difference between the temazepam and the lorazepam group appears to be associated with a more continuous drug exposure in the latter, due to the longer half-life and a more frequent intake of lorazepam. This pattern of use may be partly related to the more anxious personality traits that were observed in the chronic users of lorazepam. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic users of lorazepam show evidence of tolerance to sedative effects in comparison with healthy controls. Tolerance does not occur in chronic users of temazepam. The difference may be related to pharmacological properties, in addition to different patterns of use, associated with psychological factors.

Adult↗

Subjective effects during administration and on discontinuation of zopiclone and temazepam in normal subjects.

The purpose of the study was to ascertain whether the new hypnotic, zopiclone, was likely to produce rebound problems after short-term use, in comparison with placebo and a standard hypnotic, temazepam, and whether tapering the dosage lessened any such effects. Ten normal v olunteer subjects were administered 5 treatment sequences, each lasting 4 weeks, using a balanced design, with at least 2 weeks between sequences. The treatment sequences were: (table: see text) Each drug was given at night before retiring to bed. Daily ratings comprised a Sleep Questionnaire, Mood Rating Scales, the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory and Bodily Symptom Scales. Both drugs improved quality of sleep but their discontinuation was followed by some worsening which was postponed but not avoided by halving the dosage for a week. Speed of, and feeling on, awakening showed discontinuation effects with temazepam but not with zopiclone. Zopiclone was associated with feelings of being troubled, tense, antagonistic and bored whereas temazepam produced drowsiness, clumsiness, dreaminess and sadness. Some increase in these ratings was noted after stopping temazepam and these were less after having the dosage. Zopiclone was associated with minimal such effects. For bodily symptoms, zopiclone produced some headache, a metallic taste, and some blurring of vision; temazepam induced nausea, memory impairment and pins and needles. Withdrawal effects on bodily symptom ratings were inconsistent and not affected by tapering off the dose. In conclusion, the administration of zopiclone tends to be associated with some dysphoric effects, temazepam with sedation. Rebound effects are minimal with zopiclone and reducing the dosage gradually does not seem necessary.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Lack of effect of antimycotic itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of temazepam.

The azole antimycotics itraconazole and ketoconazole are potent and relatively nonspecific inhibitors of cytochrome P450 enzymes and have a potentially dangerous interaction with midazolam and triazolam. The possible interaction between itraconazole and a short-acting benzodiazepine, temazepam, was investigated in a double-blind, randomized crossover study. Ten healthy volunteers were given placebo or 200 mg itraconazole a day orally for 4 days. The challenge dose of 20 mg of temazepam was ingested on the fourth day, after which plasma samples were collected, and psychomotor performance tests were carried out for 24 h. Despite a statistically significant small increase of the area under the temazepam concentration-time curve, there was no clinically significant interaction, as determined by the psychomotor performance tests. The different metabolic pathways and the lack of significant firstpass metabolism of temazepam explain the great difference in the interaction potential of temazepam compared with midazolam and triazolam. Temazepam, unlike midazolam and triazolam, can be prescribed in usual doses for patients receiving itraconazole and other inhibitors of P450 3A4.

Adolescent↗

Human orthostatic reflexes after taking temazepam at night.

1. Cardiovascular orthostatic reflexes have been studied at night in 12 healthy male subjects who were given two soft gelatin capsules each containing 0 or 10 mg temazepam at 21.30 h. 2. The changes in heart rate, blood pressure and forearm blood flow on consecutive 5 min exposures to lower body negative pressure (suction) at 30, 40 and 50 mm Hg were measured before and then 1.5 and 9.5 h after giving doses of 10 or 20 mg temazepam in a placebo-controlled double-blind cross-over study. 3. Pre-suction resting values were not affected by temazepam, but 1.5 h after giving the capsules there were significant differences in the responses to suction between the placebo and 20 mg temazepam experiments: the tachycardia after 20 mg temazepam was about one-third greater and the forearm vasoconstriction was about 50% less. The effect of the 10 mg dose was equivocal. No residual effects were detected the next morning. 4. These alterations in orthostatic reflexes soon after the administration of temazepam at night did not impair the maintenance of arterial blood pressure in these healthy subjects.

Adolescent↗