Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Sulindac”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Sulindac increases the expression of APC mRNA in malignant colonic epithelial cells: an in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Sulindac is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug which induces regression of colonic polyps in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Animal and in vitro studies have shown that both the sulphide metabolite of sulindac, which is able to inhibit cyclo-oxygenase, and the sulphone metabolite, which lacks this ability, are able to inhibit the growth of colonic carcinoma cells. The exact mechanism by which these effects occurs is not known. AIMS: To examine the effect of sulindac sulphide and sulindac sulphone on the expression of APC messenger RNA (mRNA), and on the proliferation of colonic carcinoma cells in vitro. METHODS: The colonic carcinoma cell line LIM 1215 was treated with sulindac sulphide and sulindac sulphone (10 microM or 100 microM) for 24 hours. Total RNA was extracted and APC mRNA was quantitated using competitive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Measurements of cell number, cell proliferation, and prostaglandin E2 concentrations were also made. RESULTS: A significant increase in APC mRNA was observed after treatment with 10 microM of both sulindac sulphide and sulindac sulphone (control: 37.2 (19.7); 10 microM sulindac sulphide: 129 (112.8); 10 microM sulindac sulphone: 207.7 (102.9) pg/(g total RNA) (p < 0.05). Prostaglandin E2 concentrations were significantly reduced after treatment with sulindac sulphide, but not after sulindac sulphone. Both agents produced a dose dependent reduction in cell numbers and cell proliferation, which was more noticeable after treatment with sulindac sulphide. CONCLUSIONS: Both sulindac sulphide and sulindac sulphone inhibit the growth of carcinoma cells in vitro and cause an increase in APC mRNA. The effect of these agents on colonic carcinogenesis is not mediated entirely by means of an inhibition of prostaglandin biosynthesis.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed1997

Clinical pharmacokinetics of sulindac. A dynamic old drug.

Sulindac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) of the indene acetic acid class. The absorption of sulindac is rapid when given orally. Sulindac is reversibly metabolised to sulindac sulphide which has anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties and is irreversibly metabolised to sulindac sulphone which has been suggested to possess antiproliferative effects against tumours. Sulindac and its sulphide and sulphone metabolites bind extensively to plasma albumin. Sulindac is eliminated following bio-transformation; sulindac and sulindac sulphone and their respective glucurooconjugated metabolites are excreted in urine; however only a small amount of the sulindac sulphide metabolite is eliminated in urine. Following long term twice daily administration both sulindac and its metabolites accumulate in plasma. Both patients with cirrhosis and the elderly demonstrate elevated concentrations of all species upon long term sulindac administration as compared with a single dose. The disposition of sulindac and its metabolites may be tied to renal function. In end-stage renal disease, increased free fractions of all species and accumulation of the sulphide and sulphone metabolites, and to a lesser extent sulindac, occurs. Significant drug interactions have been demonstrated for dimethylsulphoxide, cyclosporin, furosemide (frusemide), hydrochlorothiazide, methotrexate and cholestyramine.

Absorption↗
PubMed2005

Sulindac induces apoptosis and protects against colon carcinoma in mice.

AIM: To study the effect of sulindac on colon cancer induction in mice. METHODS: The chemo-preventive action of 80 ppm sulindac fed during initiation and post-initiation and 100 ppm sulindac fed during progressive stages of induction of colon carcinogenesis in mice was investigated using 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH). Using the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) technique and PCNA immunohistochemical staining, we observed the apoptotic and proliferative cell density changes at different carcinogenic stages and the effect of sulindac on these two phenomena. RESULTS: Dietary sulindac significantly inhibited the incidence of colonic neoplasmas in mice. Compared with the control group, feeding sulindac during initiation and post-initiation stages inhibited the incidence by 46.7-50.4%, and feeding sulindac during progressive stages inhibited the incidence by 41.1%. Animals that were fed sulindac showed less serious pathological changes than those that were fed the control diet (P<0.01, H = 33.35). There was no difference in the density of proliferating cells among those groups which were or were not fed sulindac. In the same period, feeding sulindac resulted in a higher density of apoptotic cells than feeding control diet. CONCLUSION: Sulindac has an anti-carcinogenic function in mice. Its effect on preventing colon carcinogenesis is better than its effect on treating established tumors. By inducing apoptosis, sulindac inhibited the development of colon cancer and delayed canceration. Sulindac has no effect on proliferation. The anti-carcinogenic properties of sulindac are most effective in the moderate and severe stages of dysplasia and canceration.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Sulindac enhances adenoviral vector expressing mda-7/IL-24-mediated apoptosis in human lung cancer.

Several studies have shown antitumor activities of the melanoma differentiation-associated gene 7 (mda-7) and the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug sulindac when used as a monotherapies against a wide variety of human cancers. However, the combined effects of mda-7 and sulindac have not previously been tested. Therefore, we tested the antitumor activity of an adenoviral vector expressing mda-7 (Ad-mda7) in combination with sulindac against non-small cell lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. When treated with Ad-mda7 in combination with sulindac, human lung cancer cells (A549 and H1299) underwent growth suppression resulting in apoptosis. The growth inhibition induced by Ad-mda7 in combination with sulindac was significantly greater than that observed with Ad-mda7 or sulindac alone. Furthermore, the degree of growth inhibition induced using this combination was dose-dependent for sulindac. Treatment with Ad-mda7 in combination with sulindac had no growth inhibitory effects on human normal lung (CCD-16) fibroblasts. We then investigated the mechanism by which sulindac enhances Ad-mda7-mediated apoptosis. Sulindac increased expression of ectopic MDA-7 protein in tumor cells, thereby increasing the expression of downstream effectors RNA-dependent protein kinase, p38MAPK, caspase-9, and caspase-3 and enhancing apoptosis of non-small cell lung cancer cells. Pulse-chase experiments showed that the increased expression of MDA-7 protein in sulindac-treated cells was due to increased half-life of the MDA-7 protein. Finally, treatment of human lung tumor xenografts in nude mice with Ad-mda7 plus sulindac significantly suppressed growth (P = 0.001) compared with Ad-mda7 or sulindac alone. Our results show for the first time that combined treatment with Ad-mda7 plus sulindac enhances growth inhibition and apoptosis of human lung cancer cells. The increased antitumor activity observed with the combination treatment is a result of increased half-life of MDA-7 protein. Regulation of protein turnover is a heretofore-unrecognized mechanism of this nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

Adenoviridae↗
PubMed1993

Pharmacokinetics and dialyzability of sulindac and metabolites in patients with end-stage renal failure.

Sulindac was administered as a single 300-mg oral dose to six patients with end-stage renal failure and six normal subjects. Plasma concentrations of sulindac and its sulfide and sulfone metabolites were examined over a 48-hour period. As determined by ultrafiltration methods at 37 degrees C, the percentage free of sulindac and sulindac sulfide in plasma was greater, respectively, in the patients with renal failure (10.50 +/- 2.42 and 9.96 +/- 1.21) than in the normal subjects (6.78 +/- 0.45 and 6.01 +/- 0.37). Free sulindac plasma concentrations were not different between the two groups. However, sulindac sulfide, total and free, plasma concentrations were substantially decreased in the group with renal failure. Total area under the curve (AUC) of the sulfide metabolite was 18% in the normal subjects and the free AUC was 29%. In patients with renal failure, the apparent half-lives of sulindac (1.98 +/- 0.76 hours) and sulindac sulfide (15.6 +/- 5.8 hours) were not different from those of normal subjects. Sulindac sulfone half-life was highly variable and longer in the patient group. Studies of dialysis clearance showed that sulindac and its metabolites are poorly dialyzed. A 4-hour dialysis period increased the plasma binding of both sulindac and sulindac sulfide in the patient group. Based on the decreased plasma concentration of the active sulindac sulfide metabolite in the patient group, dosage adjustments may be required in patients with end-stage renal failure.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1990

Effects of sulindac and naproxen on prostaglandin excretion in patients with impaired renal function and rheumatoid arthritis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the current investigation was to study the influence of sulindac and naproxen on renal function and urinary excretion of the stable hydration product of prostacyclin, 6-keto-PGF1 alpha, in patients with arthritis and impaired renal function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over design, the effects of 7 days of oral sulindac 200 mg twice a day were compared with naproxen 500 mg in the morning and 250 mg in the evening in 10 patients with polyarthritis and stable impaired renal function. Inulin and para-amino-hippurate sodium were used to calculate glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow. The excretion rate of 6-keto-PGF1 alpha was measured in urine collected overnight. After patients ingested drugs in the morning, urine was collected in fractions by spontaneous voiding. Venous blood samples were drawn repeatedly for assay of electrolytes, creatinine, proteins, hormones, and drugs. Grip strength and Ritchie articular index were recorded as indicators of symptomatic antiarthritic effectiveness. RESULTS: Naproxen decreased urine levels of 6-keto PGF1 alpha by 59% (p less than 0.01). Sulindac had no effect on renal prostaglandin excretion. Naproxen reduced the glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow by 18% (p less than 0.05) and 13% (p less than 0.05), respectively, while no significant change was observed during the sulindac treatment periods. Serum levels of creatinine and complement factor D were unaffected by either drug. Plasma renin activity decreased during naproxen and sulindac treatments by 38% (p less than 0.05) and 22% (p less than 0.05). No significant change in plasma aldosterone was observed during the two drug treatments, but urinary aldosterone declined significantly (p less than 0.05) by 34% with naproxen. Albuminuria decreased (p less than 0.05) during both naproxen (41%) and sulindac treatment (72%), while the albumin/creatinine clearance ratio decreased by 59% (p less than 0.05) only during treatment with sulindac. N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase in urine was not changed by either drug. Sulindac and naproxen had no discernible effects on base excess, excretion of water, sodium, or potassium, or on osmolal clearance. However, serum potassium increased slightly but significantly (p less than 0.01) during treatment with naproxen. Sulindac sulfide, the active metabolite of sulindac, could not be traced in the urine from any of the patients. Mean arterial blood pressure declined significantly (p less than 0.05) during sulindac treatment but did not change during treatment with naproxen. Both drugs produced equal clinical improvement as measured by grip strength and the Ritchie articular index. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that when sulindac and naproxen are given in clinical equipotent doses to patients with impaired renal function, sulindac does not affect renal prostaglandin synthesis or renal function, whereas naproxen induces suppression of renal prostaglandin synthesis and a further decrease in renal function.

6-Ketoprostaglandin F1 alpha↗
PubMed2007

Differential activity of sulindac metabolites against squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is mediated by p21waf1/cip1 induction and cell cycle inhibition.

Sulindac sulfide and sulindac sulfone have demonstrated anti-neoplastic and chemo-preventive activity against various human tumors, but few studies have examined the relative effectiveness of these drugs against squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). These compounds are metabolites of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug sulindac and differ in their ability to inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme function. Sulindac sulfide (the sulindac metabolite with COX-2 inhibitory function) demonstrated strong cell growth inhibition as measured by MTT and growth assays in UM-SCC-1 and SCC-25 cells, while sulindac sulfone had only moderate effect. Growth inhibition by sulindac sulfide was associated with a significant increase in percent G cells and activation of caspase-3. Sulindac sulfide induced expression of p21wafl/cipl in a dose-dependent fashion, decreased cyclin D1 protein levels, and increased Rb hypophosphorylation. p21waf1/cip1 protein levels increased without a significant increase in wild-type p53, suggesting that sulindac sulfide induces a p53-independent pathway regulating p2lwafl/ciP1 protein levels in SCCHN. Sulindac sulfide also induced dose-dependent expression of PPAR-gamma. In contrast, sulindac sulfone did not significantly alter apoptosis, cell cycle distribution or G1 checkpoint protein expression at doses below 200 microM. These results demonstrate the differential activity of sulindac metabolites and support the hypothesis that sulindac sulfide induced perturbations in SCCHN cellular proliferation could be regulated both by p21waf1/cip1-dependent cytostatic and caspase-dependent cytotoxic pathways.

Apoptosis↗
PubMed2001

Sulindac sulfide-induced apoptosis involves death receptor 5 and the caspase 8-dependent pathway in human colon and prostate cancer cells.

Sulindac is the most extensively investigated clinically relevant chemopreventive nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Sulindac sulfide is one of the major metabolites of sulindac that is believed to mediate its antitumorigenic effects by inducing apoptosis. Recent evidence suggests that sulindac sulfide engages the mitochondrial pathway involving caspase 9 and Bax to mediate its apoptotic effects [Zhang et al., Science (Wash. DC), 290: 989-992, 2000]. In this report, we demonstrate that sulindac sulfide also engaged the membrane death receptor (DR) pathway to mediate apoptosis. Sulindac sulfide up-regulated DR5 and activated the proximal caspase 8 in various different colon and prostate cancer cell lines. Sulindac sulfide specifically up-regulated the DR5 levels but had no effect on the levels of other DRs including DR4, Fas, and tumor necrosis factor receptor 1. To further delineate the role of DR5 in sulindac sulfide-induced apoptosis, we used JCA-1 prostate cancer cells that are deficient in mounting a Fas and tumor necrosis factor receptor 1-dependent apoptotic response but are proficient in mediating DR5-dependent apoptosis. JCA-1 cells were stably transfected with dominant-negative Fas-associated death domain to block the flow of apoptotic signals originating from the endogenous DR5, and sulindac sulfide-induced apoptosis was investigated. Our results indicated that by blocking the DR5-dependent apoptotic pathway, dominant-negative Fas-associated death domain did indeed inhibit sulindac sulfide-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, exogenous tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, the ligand for DR5, also potentiated sulindac sulfide-induced apoptosis in all of the cell lines tested, thereby further supporting the involvement of DR5 in sulindac sulfide-induced apoptosis. Thus, our results demonstrate that sulindac sulfide also engages the membrane DR pathway involving DR5 and proximal caspase 8 to induce apoptosis.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2001

Molecular analysis of sulindac-resistant adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis.

PURPOSE: Sulindac causes the reduction of adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients, but complete regression is unusual, and breakthrough of colorectal carcinoma during sulindac treatment has been described. The molecular features related to sulindac resistance are unknown. Therefore, we investigated molecular alterations in adenomas from FAP patients with complete adenoma regression on sulindac (responsive patients) and from FAP patients with sulindac-resistant adenomas (resistant patients). DESIGN: Fourteen baseline adenomas (removed before sulindac treatment) from six responsive patients were studied. Also, 9 baseline adenomas and 34 resistant adenomas (removed during sulindac treatment) from three resistant patients were analyzed. Using immunohistochemistry, we evaluated the expression of beta-catenin, cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2), p53, Bcl-2, and Bax. K-ras codon 12 mutations, loss of heterozygosity at 5q (APC locus), and microsatellite instability were studied with PCR-based techniques. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between baseline adenomas from sulindac-responsive and -resistant patients (P > 0.05). There was less loss of membranous beta-catenin staining and less nuclear beta-catenin accumulation in resistant adenomas compared with baseline adenomas from the same (sulindac-resistant) patients (P < 0.01) or baseline adenomas from responsive patients (P < 0.01). Epithelial Cox-2 expression was less, though not significant, in resistant adenomas compared with baseline adenomas from resistant patients, but was significantly less in baseline adenomas from responsive patients (P < 0.01). K-ras mutations were found in 8 of 34 resistant adenomas (24%) and in none of the baseline adenomas (P < 0.05). Stromal Cox-2 expression, staining of p53 and Bcl-2, and loss of heterozygosity at 5q were comparable in both groups. Loss of Bax staining and microsatellite instability were not found in any adenoma. CONCLUSIONS: Sulindac-resistant adenomas display less alteration in beta-catenin staining and less epithelial Cox-2 expression when compared with adenomas removed before sulindac treatment. K-ras mutations may contribute to sulindac-resistance. Continued research is needed to investigate molecular alterations related to sulindac resistance.

Adenoma↗
PubMed1997

Sulfone metabolite of sulindac inhibits mammary carcinogenesis.

Sulindac sulfoxide, a commonly prescribed anti-inflammatory drug, has cancer chemopreventive activity. During its metabolism, the inactive prodrug sulindac sulfoxide undergoes either reduction to the active anti-inflammatory metabolite sulindac sulfide or irreversible oxidation to sulindac sulfone, which lacks prostaglandin synthetase inhibitory activity. Interestingly, sulindac sulfone has been reported to have cancer chemopreventive activity. The objective of the experiments reported here was to investigate the chemopreventive activity of sulindac sulfone against mammary carcinogenesis and to study its mechanism. Rats were injected with either 12.5 or 37.5 mg of 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea (MNU)/kg body weight at 50 days of age. Sulindac sulfone was incorporated into a purified diet at a concentration of either 0.03 or 0.06% (w/w) and fed to rats beginning 7 days after the injection of MNU. Sulindac sulfoxide at a level of 0.06% (w/w) was fed as a reference for comparison. Thirty rats were assigned to each dietary group treated with the high dose of MNU, and 44 rats were assigned to each dietary group treated with the low dose of MNU. The sulfone reduced cancer incidence and the number of cancers per rat irrespective of the dose of MNU injected, and its chemopreventive activity was comparable to that of sulindac sulfoxide. Cancer latency was also prolonged significantly by sulindac sulfone; the effect was particularly notable at the low dose of carcinogen, at which the prolongation of latency was >8 weeks. The sulfone inhibited the occurrence of mammary carcinomas that were classified as having either a wild-type or a mutant codon 12 in the Ha-ras gene; however, the inhibitory effect was greater against carcinomas with a mutant Ha-ras genotype. Using a mammary gland organ culture transformation assay, it was observed that sulindac sulfone also inhibited the formation of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced hyperplastic alveolar nodules and that the inhibitory activity of the sulfone was comparable to that of the sulfoxide. These data indicate that the observed effect of the sulfone on mammary carcinogenesis in vivo is likely to be due to a tissue-specific effect rather than to other systemic effects. The findings that both the prodrug and the sulfone inhibited carcinogenesis in vivo and nodule formation in organ culture and that the sulfone lacks inhibitory activity on prostaglandin synthesis suggest a mechanism(s) of chemoprevention that is independent of the prostaglandin pathway. A candidate mechanism for the apparent clonal selection pressure exerted by the sulfone against mammary carcinogenesis is apoptosis. To test this hypothesis, MCF-7 cells were exposed to a range of concentrations of sulindac sulfone and sulfoxide. Both compounds inhibited cell growth and induced apoptosis in the absence of necrosis. Collectively, these data support a specific chemopreventive effect of sulindac sulfone against mammary carcinogenesis and indicate that this compound may have a selective effect against carcinogenesis involving alterations in the signal transduction cascade of which Ha-ras is a component. Evidence is consistent with the involvement of apoptosis in the cancer-inhibitory activity observed.

9,10-Dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene↗
PubMed1994

Sulindac and polyp regression.

Sulindac is useful in regression of adenomatous polyps. In addition to orally administered sulindac, rectal preparations also appear to be efficacious [32]. However, further studies are necessary to determine whether regression of adenomas, the precursor of colorectal cancer, will cause decrease in colorectal cancer risk in both FAP and non FAP patients. Moreover, clinical studies are needed to test the application of this potential chemopreventative drug in several other patient populations. Several interesting observations have been made concerning the use of sulindac. Indomethacin, a related NSAID to sulindac, did not cause polyp regression. Also, upper gastrointestinal tract polyps in the stomach and duodenum appear not to be affected by sulindac therapy. These observations might be explained by the metabolism of sulindac in which the pharmacologically active sulfide metabolite is generated and distributed in the large intestine. Also, investigators noted that after discontinuation of sulindac adenomas recurred. Sulindac treatment was well tolerated at the usual clinical doses. Although some investigators have speculated on the effect of prostaglandin inhibition sulindac on cAMP-dependent mechanisms which control cellular proliferation [33], the cause of adenoma regression is unknown. There is evidence that colorectal endogenous prostaglandin levels decrease with sulindac. Evaluation of colorectal mucosal cellular proliferation in patients treated with sulindac has revealed a decrease in labelling index by bromodeoxyuridine labeling in one study [28] but no change in labelling index by [3H]thymidine incorporation in another investigation [34]. Also, ki 67 labelling index, another measure of cellular proliferation, was not affected in the colorectal mucosa of patients taking sulindac.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed2000

Stereoselective sulfoxidation of sulindac sulfide by flavin-containing monooxygenases. Comparison of human liver and kidney microsomes and mammalian enzymes.

The stereoselective sulfoxidation of the pharmacologically active metabolite of sulindac, sulindac sulfide, was characterized in human liver, kidney, and cDNA-expressed enzymes. Kinetic parameter estimates (pH = 7.4) for sulindac sulfoxide formation in human liver microsomes (N = 4) for R- and S-sulindac sulfoxide were V(max) = 1.5 +/- 0.50 nmol/min/mg, K(m) = 15 +/- 5.1 microM; and V(max) = 1.1 +/- 0.36 nmol/min/mg, K(m) = 16 +/- 6.1 microM, respectively. Kidney microsomes (N = 3) produced parameter estimates (pH = 7.4) of V(max) = 0.9 +/- 0.29 nmol/min/mg, K(m) = 15 +/- 2.9 microM; V(max) = 0.5 +/- 0.21 nmol/min/mg, K(m) = 22 +/- 1.9 microM for R- and S-sulindac sulfoxide, respectively. In human liver and flavin-containing monooxygenase 3 (FMO3) the V(max) for R-sulindac sulfoxide increased 60-70% at pH = 8.5, but for S-sulindac sulfoxide was unchanged. In fourteen liver microsomal preparations, significant correlations occurred between R-sulindac sulfoxide formation and either immunoquantified FMO or nicotine N-oxidation (r = 0.88 and 0.83; P < 0.01). The R- and S-sulindac sulfoxide formation rate also correlated significantly (r = 0.85 and 0.75; P < 0.01) with immunoquantified FMO in thirteen kidney microsomal samples. Mild heat deactivation of microsomes reduced activity by 30-60%, and a loss in stereoselectivity was observed. Methimazole was a potent and nonstereoselective inhibitor of sulfoxidation in liver and kidney microsomes. n-Octylamine and membrane solubilization with lubrol were potent and selective inhibitors of S-sulindac sulfoxide formation. cDNA-expressed CYPs failed to appreciably sulfoxidate sulindac sulfide, and CYP inhibitors were ineffective in suppressing catalytic activity. Purified mini-pig liver FMO1, rabbit lung FMO2, and human cDNA-expressed FMO3 efficiently oxidized sulindac sulfide with a high degree of stereoselectivity towards the R-isomer, but FMO5 lacked catalytic activity. The biotransformation of the sulfide to the sulfoxide is catalyzed predominately by FMOs and may prove to be useful in characterizing FMO activity.

Animals↗
PubMed1984

Comparison of the effects of sulindac with other cyclooxygenase inhibitors on prostaglandin excretion and renal function in normal and chronic bile duct-ligated dogs and swine.

Sulindac sulfoxide is a prodrug which must be converted to a reduced active metabolite, sulindac sulfide, in order to inhibit arachidonate cyclooxygenase. Oral administration of sulindac sulfoxide does not yield substantial amounts of sulindac sulfide in the urine. To determine whether sulindac sulfide inhibits renal prostaglandin (PG) synthesis, the active form of the drug, sulindac sulfide (5 mg/kg i.v.), was administered to four sham-ligated dogs and four dogs with liver disease induced by chronic (6 weeks) common bile duct ligation (CBDL). In both the sham and CBDL animals the sulindac sulfide caused a 60 to 90% reduction in PGE2, PGF2 alpha and 6-keto-PGF1 alpha excretion rates. In the same animals, subsequent treatment with another cyclooxygenase inhibitor, naproxen (10 mg/kg i.v.), did not result in any further decrease in PGE2 or PGF2 alpha excretion but did decrease 6-keto-PGF1 alpha excretion. In the CBDL animals, sulindac sulfide treatment decreased renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate and urine volume and resulted in the urinary excretion of large amounts of the sulindac sulfide. Similar changes in PG excretion and renal function were observed in CBDL animals treated solely with naproxen (10 mg/kg i.v.) or with ibuprofen (20 mg/kg i.v.). In four normal and three CBDL animals, we determined that i.v. administration of the prodrug, sulindac sulfoxide (5-15 mg/kg), resulted in plasma levels of 2-5 micrograms/ml of the active drug, sulindac sulfide, only in the CBDL animals. In subsequent experiments, we gave sulindac sulfoxide, 5 mg/kg i.v., to five CBDL dogs and three CBDL miniature swine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Antineoplastic drugs sulindac sulfide and sulfone inhibit cell growth by inducing apoptosis.

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug sulindac is known to inhibit chemical carcinogenesis in rodent models and cause regression of adenomas in patients with adenomatous polyposis coli. Sulindac is a prodrug that is metabolized to a pharmacologically active sulfide derivative that potently inhibits prostaglandin synthesis. Recent studies, however, have shown that a sulfone derivative of sulindac, which essentially lacks prostaglandin synthesis inhibitory activity, also inhibits chemical carcinogenesis, suggesting that reduction of prostaglandin levels is not necessary for the antineoplastic activity of this class of drugs. Both sulindac sulfide and the sulfone inhibit the growth of cultured tumor cells, although the cellular mechanism(s) responsible for the antineoplastic activity of sulindac derivatives is unknown. In this study, we investigated the effects of sulindac sulfide and sulfone on the proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of HT-29 human colon carcinoma cells. Sulindac sulfide and sulfone significantly reduced cell number in both preconfluent and confluent cultures of HT-29 cells with the sulfide showing approximately 4-fold greater potency. In addition to HT-29 cells, both drugs inhibited the growth of a variety of tumor cell lines derived from other tissues, as well as normal epithelial cells and fibroblasts. Neither sulindac sulfide nor sulfone inhibited cell proliferation under conditions where the drugs were growth inhibitory. Only under specific conditions involving mitogenic stimulation did sulindac sulfide and sulfone cause cell cycle arrest. Neither sulindac sulfide nor the sulfone induced differentiation of HT-29 cells, but both drugs strongly induced apoptosis. The apoptotic response to sulindac sulfide and sulfone was both time- and dose-dependent and involved a mechanism independent of their inhibitory effect on cell cycle progression. These data suggest that apoptosis is responsible for the cell growth inhibitory activity of sulindac sulfide and sulfone and represents a potential mechanism for the antineoplastic activity of these drugs.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed1999

A randomized double-blind study comparing the fetal effects of sulindac to terbutaline during the management of preterm labor.

OBJECTIVE: The object of this study was to compare the fetal effects of sulindac and terbutaline used in the management of preterm labor on the ductus arteriosus, middle cerebral artery, renal artery, umbilical artery, fetal urine production, and amniotic fluid index. STUDY DESIGN: In a randomized, double-blind study 20 patients with preterm labor and no evidence of fetal structural anomalies or intra-amniotic infection received either sulindac (200 mg orally every 12 hours for 6 doses) or terbutaline (5 mg orally every 4 hours) for 72 hours of therapy. All medications were administered from identical blister packs. Opaque glucose base tablets were given at 4-hour intervals in the sulindac treatment arm to mimic the dosing interval in the terbutaline arm of the study. The Doppler pulsatility indices for the ductus arteriosus, middle cerebral artery, renal artery and umbilical artery and also the fetal urinary output were obtained at baseline and 5, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the medication was started. Doppler data were analyzed within each group with raw data and between groups with the change in pulsatility indices from baseline. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality, repeated measures analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney rank sum test, and Student t test as appropriate. P <.05 (2-tailed) was used to denote statistical significance. RESULTS: There were 10 patients in each group, with no difference in gestational age between the 2 groups (32.3 vs 31.7 weeks). Sulindac was stopped in 2 patients after severe ductal constriction was noted, in 1 at 12 hours and in the other at 24 hours. One patient at 33 weeks' gestation was delivered because of fetal distress after 46 hours of sulindac therapy. When analyzed across time within groups, the pulsatility index in the ductus arteriosus decreased significantly at 12 and 24 hours in the sulindac group but not the terbutaline group. No significant differences were noted in the middle cerebral artery, umbilical artery, renal artery, or fetal urinary output within either group over time. Significant differences in the change from baseline in pulsatility index of the ductus arteriosus between the sulindac and terbutaline groups were noted at 5, 12, 24, and 48 hours. A similar effect was noted in the change from baseline in pulsatility index of the middle cerebral artery at 48 and 72 hours. There was a significant decrease in the amniotic fluid index in both groups at 24, 48, and 72 hours. The amniotic fluid index in the sulindac group was significantly lower than that in the terbutaline group at 48 and 72 hours of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Sulindac constricted the fetal ductus arteriosus, with an effect noted within 5 hours of starting therapy. The constriction, which resolved in all cases within 48 hours of discontinuing therapy, had minimal effects on the pulsatility index of the middle cerebral artery, renal artery, and umbilical artery. Sulindac and terbutaline both resulted in a significant reduction in the amniotic fluid index, with sulindac having a greater effect.

Amniotic Fluid↗
PubMed1987

A kinetic study of sulindac in the elderly.

To study the disposition of the anti-inflammatory drug sulindac, its active sulphide metabolite, and the inactive sulphone metabolite, sulindac (200 mg twice daily) was given to eight elderly subjects for at least 14 consecutive days. The drug was then ceased for 72 hours, and suitable samples were collected to study its elimination. The mean steady-state concentration for sulindac was 5.0 micrograms/ml, for sulindac sulphide was 6.5 micrograms/ml, and for sulindac sulphone was 13.2 micrograms/ml. These are approximately twice the reported steady-state levels for the respective redox forms in healthy young adults. The mean half-lives of sulindac, sulindac sulphide, and sulindac sulphone were 18.3 hours, 22.3 hours, and 54.6 hours, respectively. One patient who had mildly abnormal liver function tests developed more severe abnormalities whilst receiving sulindac. These returned towards normal after cessation of treatment. This patient had the highest steady-state plasma concentration of sulindac sulphone. It is concluded that care should be taken with the use of sulindac in the elderly, and control of patients' symptoms should be attempted with lower doses of the drug before the standard dose of 200 mg twice daily is administered.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2005

Sulindac inhibits beta-catenin expression in normal-appearing colon of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and familial adenomatous polyposis patients.

Sulindac reduces colorectal cancer risk in genetically susceptible humans and animals. The molecular mechanisms underlying these effects are incompletely understood. Many studies suggest an important role for induction of apoptosis involving the mitochondrial pathway and the death receptor pathway. Alternatively, mechanisms involving the APC-beta-catenin-Wnt pathway have been suggested, possibly mediated by p21. We determined the effects of sulindac on apoptosis and expression of death receptor (DR)-4 and DR5, beta-catenin, and p21 in normal-appearing colorectal epithelium. Biopsies were obtained before and after sulindac treatment during two chemoprevention studies. Patients (n = 18) with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) received 150 mg sulindac bd for 4 weeks in a placebo-controlled crossover design. Patients (n = 6) with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) received 150 mg sulindac bd for 6 months. Apoptosis was assessed by M30 staining and expression patterns of DR4, DR5, beta-catenin, and p21 were studied immunohistochemically. In HNPCC patients, apoptotic indices were similar following placebo and sulindac. Also in FAP patients, apoptotic indices were not different after sulindac compared with pretreatment values. Expression of DR4 and DR5 was observed in all samples with no consistent differences between placebo/baseline and sulindac. Intensity of membranous beta-catenin staining was lower in HNPCC samples following sulindac compared with placebo (P < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in FAP samples (P < 0.01). p21 expressions before and after sulindac treatment were similar in both patient groups. In conclusion, sulindac inhibits beta-catenin expression in normal colorectal epithelium from HNPCC and FAP patients without affecting apoptotic indices and DR4, DR5, and p21 expression.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed1984

Pharmacokinetics of graded oral doses of sulindac in man.

Pharmacokinetics of graded doses of sulindac were studied on 9 healthy volunteers. Serum concentrations of sulindac (inactive prodrug), sulindac sulfide (active metabolite) and sulindac sulfone (inactive metabolite) were measured both after a single dose of 150 mg, 175 mg or 200 mg and on the 6th and 7th days after b.i.d. administration of the same doses. The peak and minimum concentrations of sulindac were practically not dependent on the dose. The concentration-time curves remained similar after a single dose and after the repetitive dosing. On the contrary, both sulindac sulfide and sulfone gave about twice as high serum levels at steady-state as after a single dose. As judged from several pharmacokinetic parameters, a dose of 150 mg gave significantly smaller values than the higher doses but there was no significant difference between 175 mg and 200 mg in sulindac sulfide and sulfone concentrations. The average half-lives of sulindac, sulindac sulfide and sulfone were 1.7 -4.2 h, 15.3-16.1 h and 16.6-19.6 h, respectively. Both sulindac sulfide and sulfone tended to accumulate at a repetitive dose of 200 mg. The appropriate dose of sulindac appears to be 175 mg twice daily.

Adult↗