Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Size Perception”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Distortion of size perception in visuospatial neglect.

BACKGROUND: A number of studies have shown that most patients with symptoms of unilateral (left-sided) visuospatial neglect make consistently rightward errors when attempting to bisect a horizontal line at its midpoint. One possible interpretation of this impairment is that such patients misperceive the left half of the line: that is, that they underestimate its extent relative to the right half. RESULTS: We have carried out direct tests for such a perceptual distortion in three neglect patients by asking them to make matching judgements on pairs of horizontal rectangles, vertical rectangles or nonsense shapes, of varying relative size, presented on a computer screen. We report here that all of the patients tested showed a significant and substantial relative underestimation of the horizontal extent or area of stimuli presented on the left side of their egocentric space. There was no such misperception of vertical extent. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that size perception may be partially determined by a representational system that is anatomically centred in the parieto-temporal region of the brain. The results are interpreted in terms of damage to this system in neglect patients.

Attention↗

Relative size perception at a distance is best at eye level.

Relative size judgments were collected for two objects at 30.5 m and 23.8 from the observer in order to assess how performance depends on the relationship between the size of the objects and the eye level of the observer. In three experiments in an indoor hallway and in one experiment outdoors, accuracy was higher for objects in the neighborhood of eye level. We consider these results in the light of two hypotheses. One proposes that observers localize the horizon as a reference for judging relative size, and the other proposes that observers perceive the general neighborhood of the horizon and then employ a height-in-visual-field heuristic. The finding that relative size judgments are best around the horizon implies that information that is independent of distance perception is used in perceiving size.

Analysis of Variance↗

A computer-graphic technique for the study of body size perception and body types.

We present a novel approach for measuring body size estimation in normal and eating-disordered women and men. Clinical categories of body types were used as prototypes. By comparing the subjective appearance of a person's body with prototypes, we can understand how different attributes of his or her body shape contribute to perception of body size. After lifelike random distortions have been applied to parts of their body image, individuals adjust their body shapes until they converge on their perceived veridical appearance. Exaggeration and minimization of particular body areas measured with respect to their true shape and with different prototypes can be expressed as numerical deviations. In this way, perceived body size and body attractiveness can be appraised during the course of diagnosis and treatment of eating disorders.

Body Constitution↗

Selective deficit of visual size perception: two cases of hemimicropsia.

Hemimicropsia is a rare disorder of visual perception characterized by an apparent reduction of the size of objects when presented in one hemifield. We report two cases of hemimicropsia resulting from focal brain lesions. The first patient was an art teacher and could accurately depict his abnormal visual perception. He subsequently died and his brain was examined post mortem. In the second patient, micropsia was assessed by a quantified size comparison task. The size of a given object is normally perceived as constant across any spatial position. Hemimicropsia may thus be considered a limited violation of the size constancy principle. Behavioural and anatomical data are discussed in relation to the neural basis of visual object perception in humans.

Autopsy↗

Non-veridical size perception of expanding and contracting objects.

Observers were presented with various types of stimulus expansion and contraction which resulted in marked misperceptions of size. Firstly, the perceived size of an object which is changing in size is shown to be biased in the direction of the size change. Secondly, expansion or contraction of the internal texture of objects is found to influence their perceived size. Finally, an illusory texture manipulation in the form of a movement after-effect is shown to produce the same type of size misperception as a real expansion or contraction of internal texture. The spatio-temporal characteristics of these illusory size changes are investigated.

Humans↗

Evidence for separate, task dependent noise processes in orientation and size perception.

Spatial acuity was estimated as the minimum difference in target spatial frequency which could act as a cue in a double concurrent, single interval orientation discrimination task. Experiments were conducted with vertical and oblique (45 deg) targets at three different spatial frequencies covering a range of two octaves. Frequency thresholds were found to be lower than those estimated by conventional methods by a factor of nearly 50%. They followed Weber's law for target frequency and were independent of target orientation. The orientation thresholds exhibited a normal oblique effect, and were not affected by the simultaneous judgements of target frequency. The data support the contention that the neural codes for image size and image orientation are segregated at an early stage of processing, and that the main source of noise that limits the precision of coding in these domains exists beyond the level of early mechanisms.

Differential Threshold↗

Body size perception and dissatisfaction in female subjects of different ages.

The relationships between age and both body size estimation and body dissatisfaction were assessed by Distorting Television Image Method (DTIM) and Body Cathexis Scale (BCS) in a sample of 96 female subjects of ages ranging from 7 to 65 years. We found that there were no significant body distortion differences between different age ranges, although the most accurate perception seemed to occur during adolescence. As far as DTIM assessment of body dissatisfaction was concerned, adolescents showed no significantly greater aesthetic preoccupation than subjects of other age groups. On the other hand, using BCS, body dissatisfaction appeared to increase proportionally with age. The low, although significant, correlations between these two techniques of measuring body dissatisfaction suggest that, in addition to evaluating aesthetic features, BCS also assesses the degree of satisfaction with functional body aspects which are exposed to unavoidable decline with ageing.

Adolescent↗

Body size perception in anorexia nervosa: a signal detection approach.

This study investigated whether individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) visualize themselves as fatter than they are because they perceive themselves as fatter. Females with AN who overestimated their own body size judged size differences between pictures of their own body, and then again of someone else's body. Signal detection analysis of the results showed no differences in perceptual sensitivity between the AN and normal and thin control groups. No significant correlations were found between body size estimates and perceptual sensitivity. The anorexic group did, however, show a bias to report seeing "thin" differences, which was opposite to that of thin controls. Because bias differences between the groups were significant while sensitivity differences were not, it was concluded that abnormalities of body image most probably arise during reconstruction of the visual body image, rather than during perception of the body.

Adult↗

Perception of stimulus size in patients with burning mouth syndrome.

Twenty subjects with burning mouth syndrome (BMS) and 20 control subjects were tested for oral size perception. Blindfolded subjects assessed the size of holes (2.38-12.70 mm diameter) presented to the tongue, using their fingers to select a matching hole from a comparator series of 31 holes (0.76-15.87 mm diameter) using first static then phasic touch. Both groups overestimated the size of the holes less than 10 mm in diameter but no systematic disparity was evident with holes greater than 10 mm in diameter. The relationship between the stimulus size and the illusion (expressed as the ratio of apparent size to real size) was hyperbolic, with the illusion tending towards unity for holes greater than 10 mm. No differences were found in object size perception amongst patients with BMS or control subjects. It is therefore unlikely that altered oral size perception is a precipitating factor or accompanying feature in patients with BMS.

Adult↗