Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Sequence Alignment”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

An adaptive and iterative algorithm for refining multiple sequence alignment.

Multiple sequence alignment is a basic tool in computational genomics. The art of multiple sequence alignment is about placing gaps. This paper presents a heuristic algorithm that improves multiple protein sequences alignment iteratively. A consistency-based objective function is used to evaluate the candidate moves. During the iterative optimization, well-aligned regions can be detected and kept intact. Columns of gaps will be inserted to assist the algorithm to escape from local optimal alignments. The algorithm has been evaluated using the BAliBASE benchmark alignment database. Results show that the performance of the algorithm does not depend on initial or seed alignments much. Given a perfect consistency library, the algorithm is able to produce alignments that are close to the global optimum. We demonstrate that the algorithm is able to refine alignments produced by other software, including ClustalW, SAGA and T-COFFEE. The program is available upon request.

Algorithms↗

A reinforcement learning-enhanced fuzzy multi-objective equilibrium optimization framework for multiple sequence alignment.

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is a fundamental task in bioinformatics, underpinning comparative genomics, structural analysis, and evolutionary inference. However, MSA remains a challenging multi-objective optimization problem due to the need to simultaneously maximize alignment accuracy, preserve conserved regions, and control gap proliferation, particularly in large and heterogeneous sequence collections. In this work, we propose MOFSACEO-MSA, a novel hybrid optimization framework for multiple sequence alignment that integrates a fuzzy multi-objective evaluation scheme with the Equilibrium Optimizer (EO) and a Soft Actor-Critic (SAC)-based adaptive control mechanism. The proposed framework formulates MSA as a dynamic multi-objective optimization problem, in which alignment quality is assessed using complementary residue-level and column-level criteria, including Sum-of-Pairs score, column conservation, entropy, and gap statistics. Fuzzy membership functions are employed to harmonize competing objectives into a unified optimization landscape, while EO provides robust global exploration. To further enhance adaptability, SAC dynamically regulates key EO parameters during the search process, enabling an effective balance between exploration and exploitation across datasets of varying size and heterogeneity. Extensive experiments werew conducted on diverse biological sequence datasets, with a primary focus on RNA benchmarks, including structured families from Rfam, large-scale repositories from RNAcentral and GenBank, and organism-specific tRNA datasets from GtRNAdb. Comparative evaluations against classical alignment tools (ClustalW, MAFFT, MUSCLE, PRANK, KAlign, and T-Coffee), metaheuristic methods (SAGA, Sequoya and EAFSA), and a reinforcement learning-based approach (RLALIGN) demonstrate that MOFSACEO-MSA consistently achieves competitive or superior Sum-of-Pairs scores while significantly reducing gap proportions and maintaining compact alignment lengths. Notably, the proposed framework exhibits improved robustness on large and highly heterogeneous datasets, where existing methods often suffer from excessive gap insertion or unstable convergence. Overall, MOFSACEO-MSA provides a flexible and extensible optimization paradigm that effectively bridges evolutionary search and reinforcement learning for high-quality multiple sequence alignment, with demonstrated effectiveness on challenging RNA alignment tasks.

Sequence Alignment↗

Use of multiple profiles corresponding to a sequence alignment enables effective detection of remote homologues.

MOTIVATION: Position specific scoring matrices (PSSMs) corresponding to aligned sequences of homologous proteins are commonly used in homology detection. A PSSM is generated on the basis of one of the homologues as a reference sequence, which is the query in the case of PSI-BLAST searches. The reference sequence is chosen arbitrarily while generating PSSMs for reverse BLAST searches. In this work we demonstrate that the use of multiple PSSMs corresponding to a given alignment and variable reference sequences is more effective than using traditional single PSSMs and hidden Markov models. RESULTS: Searches for proteins with known 3-D structures have been made against three databases of protein family profiles corresponding to known structures: (1) One PSSM per family; (2) multiple PSSMs corresponding to an alignment and variable reference sequences for every family; and (3) hidden Markov models. A comparison of the performances of these three approaches suggests that the use of multiple PSSMs is most effective. CONTACT: ns@mbu.iisc.ernet.in.

Algorithms↗

Comprehensive study on iterative algorithms of multiple sequence alignment.

Multiple sequence alignment is an important problem in the biosciences. To date, most multiple alignment systems have employed a tree-based algorithm, which combines the results of two-way dynamic programming in a tree-like order of sequence similarity. The alignment quality is not, however, high enough when the sequence similarity is low. Once an error occurs in the alignment process, that error can never be corrected. Recently, an effective new class of algorithms has been developed. These algorithms iteratively apply dynamic programming to partially aligned sequences to improve their alignment quality. The iteration corrects any errors that may have occurred in the alignment process. Such an iterative strategy requires heuristic search methods to solve practical alignment problems. Incorporating such methods yields various iterative algorithms. This paper reports our comprehensive comparison of iterative algorithms. We proved that performance improves remarkably when using a tree-based iterative method, which iteratively refines an alignment whenever two subalignments are merged in a tree-based way. We propose a tree-dependent, restricted partitioning technique to efficiently reduce the execution time of iterative algorithms.

Algorithms↗

Amino acid and nucleotide recurrence in aligned sequences: synonymous substitution patterns in association with global and local base compositions.

The tendency for repetitiveness of nucleotides in DNA sequences has been reported for a variety of organisms. We show that the tendency for repetitive use of amino acids is widespread and is observed even for segments conserved between human and Drosophila melanogaster at the level of >50% amino acid identity. This indicates that repetitiveness influences not only the weakly constrained segments but also those sequence segments conserved among phyla. Not only glutamine (Q) but also many of the 20 amino acids show a comparable level of repetitiveness. Repetitiveness in bases at codon position 3 is stronger for human than for D.melanogaster, whereas local repetitiveness in intron sequences is similar between the two organisms. While genes for immune system-specific proteins, but not ancient human genes (i.e. human homologs of Escherichia coli genes), have repetitiveness at codon bases 1 and 2, repetitiveness at codon base 3 for these groups is similar, suggesting that the human genome has at least two mechanisms generating local repetitiveness. Neither amino acid nor nucleotide repetitiveness is observed beyond the exon boundary, denying the possibility that such repetitiveness could mainly stem from natural selection on mRNA or protein sequences. Analyses of mammalian sequence alignments show that while the 'between gene' GC content heterogeneity, which is linked to 'isochores', is a principal factor associated with the bias in substitution patterns in human, 'within gene' heterogeneity in nucleotide composition is also associated with such bias on a more local scale. The relationship amongst the various types of repetitiveness is discussed.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Likelihood-mapping: a simple method to visualize phylogenetic content of a sequence alignment.

We introduce a graphical method, likelihood-mapping, to visualize the phylogenetic content of a set of aligned sequences. The method is based on an analysis of the maximum likelihoods for the three fully resolved tree topologies that can be computed for four sequences. The three likelihoods are represented as one point inside an equilateral triangle. The triangle is partitioned in different regions. One region represents star-like evolution, three regions represent a well-resolved phylogeny, and three regions reflect the situation where it is difficult to distinguish between two of the three trees. The location of the likelihoods in the triangle defines the mode of sequence evolution. If n sequences are analyzed, then the likelihoods for each subset of four sequences are mapped onto the triangle. The resulting distribution of points shows whether the data are suitable for a phylogenetic reconstruction or not.

Animals↗

Reduced space sequence alignment.

MOTIVATION: Sequence alignment is the problem of finding the optimal character-by-character correspondence between two sequences. It can be readily solved in O(n2) time and O(n2) space on a serial machine, or in O(n) time with O(n) space per O(n) processing elements on a parallel machine. Hirschberg's divide-and-conquer approach for finding the single best path reduces space use by a factor of n while inducing only a small constant slowdown to the serial version. RESULTS: This paper presents a family of methods for computing sequence alignments with reduced memory that are well suited to serial or parallel implementation. Unlike the divide-and-conquer approach, they can be used in the forward-backward (Baum-Welch) training of linear hidden Markov models, and they avoid data-dependent repartitioning, making them easier to parallelize. The algorithms feature, for an arbitrary integer L, a factor proportional to L slowdown in exchange for reducing space requirement from O(n2) to O(n1 square root of n). A single best path member of this algorithm family matches the quadratic time and linear space of the divide-and-conquer algorithm. Experimentally, the O(n1.5)-space member of the family is 15-40% faster than the O(n)-space divide-and-conquer algorithm.

Algorithms↗

Average values of a dissimilarity measure not requiring sequence alignment are twice the averages of conventional mismatch counts requiring sequence alignment for a computer-generated model system.

Three measures of sequence dissimilarity have been compared on a computer-generated model system in which substitutions in random sequences were made at randomly selected sites and the replacement character was chosen at random from the set of characters different from the original occupant of the site. The three measures were the conventional mismatch count between aligned sequences (AMC = m) and two measures not requiring prior sequence alignment. The latter two measures were the squared Euclidean distance between vectors of counts of t-tuples (t = 1-6) of characters in the two sequences (multiplet distribution distances or MDD = d) and counts of characters not covered by word structures of statistically significant length common to the two sequences (common long words or CLW = SIB, SIS, or SAB). Average MDD distances were found to be two times average mismatch counts in the simulated sequences for all values of t from 1 to 6 and all degrees of substitution from one per sequence to so many as to produce, effectively, random sequences. This simple relation held independently of sequence length and of sequence composition. The relation was confirmed by exact results on small model systems and by formal asymptotic results in the limit of so few substitutions that no double hits occur and in the limit of two random sequences. The coefficient of variation for MDD distances was greater than that for mismatch counts for singlets but both measures approached the same low value for sextets. Needleman-Wunsch alignment produced incorrect mismatch counts at higher degrees of substitution. The model satisfied the conditions for the derivation of the Jukes-Cantor asymptotic adjustment, but its application produced increasingly bad results with increasing degrees of substitution in accord with earlier results on model and natural sequences. This fact was a consequence of the increase with increasing degrees of substitution of the sensitivity of the adjustment to error in the observations. Average CLW distances for a variety of common word structures were more or less parallel to MDD distances for appropriately long t-tuples. These results on model systems supported the validity of the two dissimilarity measures not requiring sequence alignment that was found in earlier work on natural sequences (Blaisdell 1989).

Base Sequence↗

A simple and fast approach to prediction of protein secondary structure from multiply aligned sequences with accuracy above 70%.

To improve secondary structure predictions in protein sequences, the information residing in multiple sequence alignments of substituted but structurally related proteins is exploited. A database comprised of 70 protein families and a total of 2,500 sequences, some of which were aligned by tertiary structural superpositions, was used to calculate residue exchange weight matrices within alpha-helical, beta-strand, and coil substructures, respectively. Secondary structure predictions were made based on the observed residue substitutions in local regions of the multiple alignments and the largest possible associated exchange weights in each of the three matrix types. Comparison of the observed and predicted secondary structure on a per-residue basis yielded a mean accuracy of 72.2%. Individual alpha-helix, beta-strand, and coil states were respectively predicted at 66.7, and 75.8% correctness, representing a well-balanced three-state prediction. The accuracy level, verified by cross-validation through jack-knife tests on all protein families, dropped, on average, to only 70.9%, indicating the rigor of the prediction procedure. On the basis of robustness, conceptual clarity, accuracy, and executable efficiency, the method has considerable advantage, especially with its sole reliance on amino acid substitutions within structurally related proteins.

Algorithms↗

A Bayesian evolutionary distance for parametrically aligned sequences.

There is an inherent relationship between the process of pairwise sequence alignment and the estimation of evolutionary distance. This relationship is explored and made explicit. Assuming an evolutionary model and given a specific pattern of observed base mismatches, the relative probabilities of evolution at each evolutionary distance are computed using a Bayesian framework. The mean or the median of this probability distribution provides a robust estimate of the central value. The evolutionary distance has traditionally been computed as zero for an observed homology of 20 bases with no mismatches; we prove that it is highly probable that the distance is greater than 0.01. The mean of the distribution is 0.047, which is a better estimate of the evolutionary distance. Bayesian estimates of the evolutionary distance incorporate arbitrary prior information about variable mutation rates both over time and along sequence position, thus requiring only a weak form of the molecular-clock hypothesis. The endpoints of the similarity between genomic DNA sequences are often ambiguous. The probability of evolution at each evolutionary distance can be estimated over the entire set of alignments by choosing the best alignment at each distance and the corresponding probability of duplication at that evolutionary distance. A central value of this distribution provides a robust evolutionary distance estimate. We provide an efficient algorithm for computing the parametric alignment, considering evolutionary distance as the only parameter. These techniques and estimates are used to infer the duplication history of the genomic sequence in C. elegans and in S. cerevisiae. Our results indicate that repeats discovered using a single scoring matrix show a considerable bias in subsequent evolutionary distance estimates.

Animals↗

Pattern-constrained multiple polypeptide sequence alignment.

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is one of the fundamental research topics in computational biology. The alignments help us to find functional assignment, evolutionary history and conserved region. Previous methods use a substitution matrix and do not incorporate knowledge of the sequences being aligned. Therefore, they do not assure the alignment of similar structures and common patterns in the sequences. We have been investigating into the solution to the problem in multiple and making use of knowledge of the sequences being aligned, including patterns in the Prosite databank, Blocks+, eBlocks databases, as well as motif and structural information. A pattern-constrained algorithm has been developed. Experiments with protein sequences have shown more accurate alignments with incorporation of the domain knowledge available in the sequences.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Evaluation measures of multiple sequence alignments.

Multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) are frequently used in the study of families of protein sequences or DNA/RNA sequences. They are a fundamental tool for the understanding of the structure, functionality and, ultimately, the evolution of proteins. A new algorithm, the Circular Sum (CS) method, is presented for formally evaluating the quality of an MSA. It is based on the use of a solution to the Traveling Salesman Problem, which identifies a circular tour through an evolutionary tree connecting the sequences in a protein family. With this approach, the calculation of an evolutionary tree and the errors that it would introduce can be avoided altogether. The algorithm gives an upper bound, the best score that can possibly be achieved by any MSA for a given set of protein sequences. Alternatively, if presented with a specific MSA, the algorithm provides a formal score for the MSA, which serves as an absolute measure of the quality of the MSA. The CS measure yields a direct connection between an MSA and the associated evolutionary tree. The measure can be used as a tool for evaluating different methods for producing MSAs. A brief example of the last application is provided. Because it weights all evolutionary events on a tree identically, but does not require the reconstruction of a tree, the CS algorithm has advantages over the frequently used sum-of-pairs measures for scoring MSAs, which weight some evolutionary events more strongly than others. Compared to other weighted sum-of-pairs measures, it has the advantage that no evolutionary tree must be constructed, because we can find a circular tour without knowing the tree.

Algorithms↗

Sequence alignment approach to pick up conformationally similar protein fragments.

Crystal structure data of globular proteins were used to prepare (phi, psi) probability maps of 20 proteinous amino acids. These maps were compared grid-wise with each other and a conformational similarity index was calculated for each pair of amino acids. A weight matrix, called Conformational Similarity Weight (CSW) matrix, was prepared using the conformational similarity index. This weight matrix was used to align sequences of 21 pairs of proteins whose crystal structures are known. The aligned regions with more than seven contiguous amino acids were further analysed by plotting average weight (W) values of overlapping hepatapeptides in these regions and carrying out curve fitting by Fourier series having TEN harmonics. The protein fragments corresponding to the half-linewidth of peaks were predicted as fragments having similar conformation in the protein pair under consideration. Such an approach allows us to pick up conformationally similar protein fragments with more than 67% accuracy.

Amino Acids↗

Average values of a dissimilarity measure not requiring sequence alignment are twice the averages of conventional mismatch counts requiring sequence alignment for a variety of computer-generated model systems.

A measure of sequence similarity, dt, not requiring prior sequence alignment gave correct results for a variety of computer-generated model sequences without and with gaps for all degrees of substitution, s. Measure d was the squared Euclidean distance between vectors of counts of t-tuplets of characters in the two sequences. In models without gaps and without Needleman-Wunsch alignment, average d was very closely equal to twice average conventional mismatch counts, m. In these models one of each of the conditions on the Jukes-Cantor model was violated in turn: (1) both descendant lineages receive the same number of substitutions, (2) all sites are equally likely to be substituted, (3) all different replacement characters are equally likely to be chosen, and (4) all original characters are equally likely to be substituted. In Jukes-Cantor models with gaps Needleman-Wunsch alignment was necessarily performed, a procedure that generally produced incorrect values of m. For these models average d was found to be very closely equal to twice the average m estimated from the known value of s using the inverted Jukes-Cantor formula.

Algorithms↗

Prediction of protein structure by evaluation of sequence-structure fitness. Aligning sequences to contact profiles derived from three-dimensional structures.

The problem of protein structure prediction is formulated here as that of evaluating how well an amino acid sequence fits a hypothetical structure. The simplest and most complicated approaches, secondary structure prediction and all-atom free energy calculations, can be viewed as sequence-structure fitness problems. Here, an approach of intermediate complexity is described, which involves; (1) description of a protein structure in terms of contact interface vectors, with both intra-protein and protein-solvent contacts counted, (2) derivation of sequence preferences for 2 up to 29 contact interface types, (3) generation of numerous hypothetical model structures by placing the input sequence into a large set of known three-dimensional structures in all possible alignments, (4) evaluation of these models by summing the sequence preferences over all structural positions and (5) choice of predicted three-dimensional structure as that with the best sequence-structure fitness. Evolutionary information is incorporated by using position-dependent core weights derived from multiple sequence alignments. A number of tests of the method are performed: (1) evaluation of cyclic shifts of a sequence in its native structure; (2) alignment of a sequence in its native structure, allowing gaps; (3) alignment search with a sequence or sequence fragment in a database of structures; and (4) alignment search with a structure in a database of sequences. The main results are: (1) a native sequence can very well find its native structure among a large number of alternatives, in correct alignment; (2) substructures, such as (beta alpha)n units, can be detected in spite of very low sequence similarity; (3) remote homologous can be detected, with some dependence on the set of parameters used; (4) contact interface parameters are clearly superior to classical secondary structure parameters; (5) a simple interface description in terms of just two states, protein-protein and protein-water contacts, performs surprisingly well; (6) the use of core weights considerably improves accuracy in detection of remote homologues; (7) based on a sequence database search with a myoglobin contact profile, the C-terminal domain of a viral origin of replication binding protein is predicted to have an all-helical fold. The sequence-structure fitness concept is sufficiently general to accommodate a large variety of protein structure prediction methods, including new models of intermediate complexity currently being developed.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Multiple DNA and protein sequence alignment on a workstation and a supercomputer.

This paper describes a multiple alignment method using a workstation and supercomputer. The method is based on the alignment of a set of aligned sequences with the new sequence, and uses a recursive procedure of such alignment. The alignment is executed in a reasonable computation time on diverse levels from a workstation to a supercomputer, from the viewpoint of alignment results and computational speed by parallel processing. The application of the algorithm is illustrated by several examples of multiple alignment of 12 amino acid and DNA sequences of HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) env genes. Colour graphic programs on a workstation and parallel processing on a supercomputer are discussed.

Algorithms↗

An enhanced RNA alignment benchmark for sequence alignment programs.

BACKGROUND: The performance of alignment programs is traditionally tested on sets of protein sequences, of which a reference alignment is known. Conclusions drawn from such protein benchmarks do not necessarily hold for the RNA alignment problem, as was demonstrated in the first RNA alignment benchmark published so far. For example, the twilight zone - the similarity range where alignment quality drops drastically - starts at 60 % for RNAs in comparison to 20 % for proteins. In this study we enhance the previous benchmark. RESULTS: The RNA sequence sets in the benchmark database are taken from an increased number of RNA families to avoid unintended impact by using only a few families. The size of sets varies from 2 to 15 sequences to assess the influence of the number of sequences on program performance. Alignment quality is scored by two measures: one takes into account only nucleotide matches, the other measures structural conservation. The performance order of parameters--like nucleotide substitution matrices and gap-costs--as well as of programs is rated by rank tests. CONCLUSION: Most sequence alignment programs perform equally well on RNA sequence sets with high sequence identity, that is with an average pairwise sequence identity (APSI) above 75 %. Parameters for gap-open and gap-extension have a large influence on alignment quality lower than APSI < or = 75 %; optimal parameter combinations are shown for several programs. The use of different 4 x 4 substitution matrices improved program performance only in some cases. The performance of iterative programs drastically increases with increasing sequence numbers and/or decreasing sequence identity, which makes them clearly superior to programs using a purely non-iterative, progressive approach. The best sequence alignment programs produce alignments of high quality down to APSI > 55 %; at lower APSI the use of sequence+structure alignment programs is recommended.

Journal Article↗

Multiple sequence alignments.

Multiple sequence alignments are very widely used in all areas of DNA and protein sequence analysis. The main methods that are still in use are based on 'progressive alignment' and date from the mid to late 1980s. Recently, some dramatic improvements have been made to the methodology with respect either to speed and capacity to deal with large numbers of sequences or to accuracy. There have also been some practical advances concerning how to combine three-dimensional structural information with primary sequences to give more accurate alignments, when structures are available.

Algorithms↗