Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Rituximab”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Rituximab-mediated chemosensitization of AIDS and non-AIDS non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Patients with B non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) initially respond to conventional chemotherapy. However, relapses and recurrences occur and the patients develop resistance to further treatment. Immunotherapeutic approaches have been considered in the treatment of such patients. Rituximab (chimeric anti-human CD20 monoclonal antibody) is the first anti-cancer monoclonal antibody approved by the FDA for the treatment of B-NHL. It has been used alone or in combination with chemotherapy, and the clinical response rates have been 50% and greater than 95%, respectively. The in vivo mechanism by which rituximab mediates its effects is not clear, though ADCC, CDC and apoptosis have been suggested and supported by several studies. However, many patients do not respond to rituximab or become refractory to rituximab treatment and the underlying mechanism of unresponsiveness is not known. This review describes various molecular signaling pathways modified by rituximab using in vitro B-NHL cell lines as model systems. The findings demonstrate that rituximab treatment modulates the p38 MAPK, the Raf-1/MEK/ERK1/2 and the NF-kappaB pathways. These modifications induced by rituximab were in large part responsible for the down-regulation of the anti-apoptotic gene products Bcl-2/Bcl-xL and chemosensitization of the drug-resistant B-NHL cell lines to various drug-induced apoptosis. Studies on the development of resistance to rituximab were investigated with rituximab-resistant B-NHL clones derived from rituximab-sensitive B-NHL cell lines. The molecular signaling pathways modified by rituximab revealed several novel intracellular targets whose modification could sensitize both rituximab-sensitive and rituximab-resistant B-NHL to drug-induced apoptosis. These in vitro findings provide new possibilities for improving the clinical effectiveness of rituximab as well as for circumventing its resistance.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2007

Recombinant interleukin-2 significantly augments activity of rituximab in human tumor xenograft models of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) is a pleiotropic cytokine that activates select immune effector cell responses associated with antitumor activity, including antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Rituximab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that activates ADCC in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The ability of rIL-2 to augment rituximab-dependent tumor responses was investigated. The efficacy of rIL-2 in combination with rituximab was evaluated in 2 NHL tumor xenograft models: the CD20hi, rituximab-sensitive, low-grade Daudi model and the CD20lo, aggressive, rituximab-resistant Namalwa model. Combination of rIL-2 plus rituximab was synergistic in a rituximab-sensitive Daudi tumor model, as evidenced by significant tumor regressions and increased time to tumor progression, compared with rIL-2 and rituximab single agents. In contrast, rituximab-resistant Namalwa tumors were responsive to single-agent rIL-2 and showed an increased response when combined with rituximab. Using in vitro killing assays, rIL-2 was shown to enhance activity of rituximab by activating ADCC and lymphokine-activated killer activity. Additionally, the activity of rIL-2 plus rituximab F(ab')2 was similar to that of rIL-2 alone, indicating a critical role for immunoglobulin G1 Fc-FcgammaR-effector responses in mediating ADCC. Antiproliferative and apoptotic tumor responses, along with an influx of immune effector cells, were observed by immunohistochemistry. Collectively, the data suggest that rIL-2 mediates potent tumoricidal activity against NHL tumors, in part, through activation and trafficking of monocytes and natural killer cells to tumors. These data support the mechanistic and therapeutic rationale for combination of rIL-2 with rituximab in NHL clinical trials and for single-agent rIL-2 in rituximab-resistant NHL patients.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Outcomes in patients with splenic marginal zone lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma treated with rituximab with or without chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of patients with splenic marginal zone lymphoma/marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is controversial. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the outcomes of patients with SMZL who received treatment with rituximab, rituximab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy alone. METHODS: The Leukemia Service database was searched for patients with splenic lymphoma who were registered between May 1995 and October 2004. The indications for treatment were the same as those used for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. RESULTS: SMZL was confirmed in 70 patients. The median age was 64 years. The median number of CD20 molecules per cell was 69 x 10(3). Forty-three patients required systemic therapy; rituximab in 26 patients, chemotherapy plus rituximab in 6 patients, and chemotherapy alone in 11 patients. Ten additional patients underwent splenectomy, and 17 patients were in the observation group. The overall response rates were 88% with rituximab, 83% with rituximab plus chemotherapy, and 55% with chemotherapy alone; the 3-year survival rates were 95%, 100%, and 55%, respectively. The 3-year failure-free survival (FFS) rates were 86%, 100%, and 45% in the rituximab, rituximab plus chemotherapy, and chemotherapy alone groups, respectively. Rituximab treatments resulted in longer survival and FFS compared with chemotherapy. Rituximab alone resulted in disappearance of splenomegaly in 92% of patients and normalization of absolute lymphocyte counts. In univariate analysis, younger age and rituximab-based therapy were predictive of longer FFS. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab with or without chemotherapy was found to have major activity in patients with SMZL. These results may be associated with high levels of cellular CD20 antigen sites. Rituximab should be the treatment of choice, at least in older patients with SMZL who have comorbid diseases.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Cellular and molecular signal transduction pathways modulated by rituximab (rituxan, anti-CD20 mAb) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: implications in chemosensitization and therapeutic intervention.

The clinical application of rituximab (chimeric mouse anti-human CD20 mAb, Rituxan, IDEC-C2B8), alone and/or combined with chemotherapy, has significantly ameliorated the treatment outcome of patients with relapsed and refractory low-grade or follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The exact in vivo mechanisms of action of rituximab are not fully understood, although antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), and apoptosis have been suggested. We have proposed that modifications of the cellular signaling pathways by rituximab may be crucial for its clinical response. The B-cell restricted cell surface phosphoprotein CD20 is involved in many cellular signaling events including proliferation, activation, differentiation, and apoptosis upon crosslinking. Monomeric rituximab chemosensitizes drug-resistant NHL cells via selective downregulation of antiapoptotic factors through the type II mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Several signaling pathways are affected by rituximab which are implicated in the underlying molecular mechanisms of chemosensitization. ARL (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related lymphoma) and non-ARL cell lines have been examined as in vitro model systems. In ARL, rituximab diminishes the activity of the p38MAPK signaling pathway resulting in inhibition of the interleukin (IL)-10/IL-10R autocrine/paracrine cytokine autoregulatory loop leading to the inhibition of constitutive STAT-3 activity and subsequent downregulation of Bcl-2 expression leading to chemosensitization. Rituximab upregulates Raf-1 kinase inhibitor protein (RKIP) expression in non-ARL cells. Through physical association with Raf-1 and nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappa B)-inducing kinase (NIK), RKIP negatively regulates two major survival pathways, namely, the extracellular signal-regulated kinase1/2 (ERK1/2) and the NF-kappa B pathways, respectively. Downmodulation of the ERK1/2 and NF-kappa B pathways inhibits the transcriptional activity of AP-1 and NF-kappa B transcription factors, respectively, both of which lead to the downregulation of Bcl-(xL) (Bcl-2 related gene (long alternatively spliced variant of Bcl-x gene)) transcription and expression and sensitization to drug-induced apoptosis. Bcl-(xL)-overexpressing cells corroborated the pivotal role of Bcl-(xL) in chemosensitization. The specificity of rituximab-mediated signaling and functional effects were corroborated by the use of specific pharmacological inhibitors. Many patients do not respond and/or relapse and the mechanisms of unresponsiveness are unknown. Rituximab-resistant B-NHL clones were generated to investigate the acquired resistance to rituximab-mediated signaling, and chemosensitization. Resistant clones display different phenotypic, genetic and functional properties compared to wild-type cells. This review summarizes the data highlighting a novel role of rituximab as a signal-inducing antibody and as a chemosensitizing agent through negative regulation of major survival pathways. Studies presented herein also reveal several intracellular targets modified by rituximab, which can be exploited for therapeutic and prognostic purposes in the treatment of patients with rituximab- and drug-refractory NHL.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

First-line and maintenance treatment with rituximab for patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The chimeric human-mouse anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has durable single-agent activity in patients with relapsed and refractory indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The focus of this report is a phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of single-agent rituximab as first-line therapy in patients with indolent lymphoma and scheduled maintenance treatment in prolonging duration of remission. Patients received a 4-week course of standard rituximab (375 mg/m(2) intravenously weekly x 4). Those achieving objective response or stable disease then received maintenance courses of standard rituximab every 6 months, for a maximum of four rituximab courses. Of 62 patients entered in the trial, 61% had follicular lymphoma while 39% had small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). At 6 weeks, 28 of 60 evaluable patients (47%) had an objective response. The response rate improved to 73% (37% complete response) following maintenance rituximab therapy and was similar in patients with follicular lymphoma and SLL (76% v 70%, respectively). Median progression-free survival for the entire group was 34 months. Single-agent therapy was well tolerated and maintenance rituximab was administered without grade 3/4 toxicity. Because of the higher activity of rituximab in this study compared with previous results in patients with relapsed or refractory SLL, a second phase II trial of identical design but limited to patients with SLL and chronic lymphocytic leukemia was initiated. Forty-four patients entered this second trial and, at present, 27 continue to receive maintenance courses of rituximab. The current response rate is 56% (8% complete responses). In summary, rituximab appears highly active as first-line single-agent therapy for indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and responses may be improved with maintenance courses of rituximab. Results suggest a higher response rate to rituximab when used as first-line compared with second/third-line treatment, particularly in the subset of patients with SLL and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Further follow-up will provide important information regarding the impact of first-line and maintenance rituximab on progression-free survival in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2002

Rituximab therapy for indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs) are essentially incurable with current treatments. Rituximab is a specific anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody against the CD20 antigen, which is stably expressed on most B-cells (from the pre-B-cell stage). Compared with chemotherapy, rituximab has an excellent tolerability profile, making it a good therapeutic option for patients with indolent NHL. In the pivotal study for rituximab, patients with relapsed or refractory indolent or follicular lymphoma (FL) had an overall response rate of 50%. There is evidence that first-line rituximab therapy may be associated with better response rates; in previously untreated FL with a low tumor burden, rituximab monotherapy has produced an overall response rate of 73%. Attempts to improve response rates to rituximab by increasing the dose or frequency of dosing showed that the addition of four extra infusions of rituximab (in addition to the standard treatment schedule) resulted in an overall response rate of 76% in patients with FL. Augmenting rituximab with cytokines is also an option for increasing response rates in patients with indolent NHL. In a trial by the Nordic Lymphoma Study Group in patients with previously untreated or first-relapse indolent NHL, who had stable disease or a partial response after four doses of rituximab, 48% of the patients treated with rituximab plus interferon-alpha2a achieved a complete response. A further option is to combine rituximab with chemotherapy. Interim analyses from the East German Study Group have shown that rituximab plus mitoxantrone, chlorambucil and prednisolone (MCP) resulted in overall response rates of 89% in patients with untreated indolent lymphoma. Rituximab is therefore an excellent treatment option both as first-line and as salvage therapy for patients with indolent NHL.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2003

Neutrophils contribute to the biological antitumor activity of rituximab in a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma severe combined immunodeficiency mouse model.

PURPOSE: Rituximab is a chimeric antibody (Ab) directed against the cluster designated (CD) 20 antigen found on normal and malignant B cells. Rituximab activity has been associated with complement-mediated cytotoxicity, Ab-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and induction of apoptosis. Recent studies performed in severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mouse models suggest that in vivo rituximab-associated ADCC is mediated via the FcgammaRIII receptor on effector cells. Despite low level expression of FcgammaRIII, neutrophils are also known to induce ADCC primarily via FcgammaRI receptor (CD64). The purpose of this work was to study the effect(s) of neutrophils on the in vivo antitumor activity of rituximab. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To better characterize the biological activity of rituximab, we used a human non-Hodgkin's lymphoma animal model by injecting Raji cells i.v. into natural killer (NK) cell-depleted SCID mice. Disseminated disease involving liver, lung, and central nervous system developed, with subsequent death occurring approximately 3 weeks after tumor inoculation. Specifically, 6-8-week-old NK cell-depleted SCID mice were inoculated by tail vein injection with 1 x 10(6) Raji cells on day 0. The animals then were divided into three cohorts: (a) group A received placebo (PBS); (b) group B received rituximab administered via tail vein injection at 10 mg/kg on days 3, 5, 7, and 11; and (c) group C consisted of neutrophil-depleted SCID mice treated with rituximab at 10 mg/kg on the same schedule. Neutrophils were depleted by i.p. administration of 80 microg of rat antimouse Ly-6G (Gr-1) Ab (BD PharMingen, Inc.) on days -1, 4, 9, and 14. The end point of the study was survival. Differences in outcome between treatment groups were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology. RESULTS: Neutrophil- and NK cell-depleted SCID mice (group C) did not respond to rituximab, and the mean survival time was not significantly different from that of control mice. NK cell-depleted SCID mice with intact neutrophil function (group B) responded to rituximab, and 66% remained alive and appeared healthy after a mean follow-up period of 246 days. Overall, NK cell-depleted SCID mice with intact neutrophil function treated with rituximab had statistically longer mean survival as compared with mice in neutrophil-depleted and control groups (161 days versus 28 days versus 22 days, P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of neutrophils, rituximab was less effective in controlling lymphoma cell growth or prolonging survival in our B-cell lymphoma SCID mouse model. Neutrophil-induced ADCC appears to contribute to the in vivo antitumor activity of rituximab. Strategies that improve the function of neutrophils, such as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor or G-CSF priming, may increase the antitumor effects of rituximab. Additional in vivo animal studies are warranted.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty-four weeks.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of treatment with rituximab plus methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies and to explore the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rituximab in this population. METHODS: We evaluated primary efficacy and safety at 24 weeks in patients enrolled in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Efficacy of Rituximab in RA (REFLEX) Trial, a 2-year, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of rituximab therapy. Patients with active RA and an inadequate response to 1 or more anti-TNF agents were randomized to receive intravenous rituximab (1 course, consisting of 2 infusions of 1,000 mg each) or placebo, both with background MTX. The primary efficacy end point was a response on the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at 24 weeks. Secondary end points were responses on the ACR50 and ACR70 improvement criteria, the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, and the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria at 24 weeks. Additional end points included scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Disability Index (DI), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) instruments, as well as Genant-modified Sharp radiographic scores at 24 weeks. RESULTS: Patients assigned to placebo (n = 209) and rituximab (n = 311) had active, longstanding RA. At week 24, significantly more (P < 0.0001) rituximab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients demonstrated ACR20 (51% versus 18%), ACR50 (27% versus 5%), and ACR70 (12% versus 1%) responses and moderate-to-good EULAR responses (65% versus 22%). All ACR response parameters were significantly improved in rituximab-treated patients, who also had clinically meaningful improvements in fatigue, disability, and health-related quality of life (demonstrated by FACIT-F, HAQ DI, and SF-36 scores, respectively) and showed a trend toward less progression in radiographic end points. Rituximab depleted peripheral CD20+ B cells, but the mean immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgM, and IgA) remained within normal ranges. Most adverse events occurred with the first rituximab infusion and were of mild-to-moderate severity. The rate of serious infections was 5.2 per 100 patient-years in the rituximab group and 3.7 per 100 patient-years in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: At 24 weeks, a single course of rituximab with concomitant MTX therapy provided significant and clinically meaningful improvements in disease activity in patients with active, longstanding RA who had an inadequate response to 1 or more anti-TNF therapies.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

CD20-specific antibody-targeted chemotherapy of non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma using calicheamicin-conjugated rituximab.

Tumor-targeted delivery of a potent cytotoxic agent, calicheamicin, using its immunoconjugates is a clinically validated therapeutic strategy. Rituximab is a human CD20-specific chimeric antibody extensively used in B-NHL therapy. We investigated whether conjugation to calicheamicin can improve the anti-tumor activity of rituximab against human B-cell lymphoma (BCL) xenografts in preclinical models. BCL cells were cultured with rituximab or its calicheamicin conjugates and their in vitro growth was monitored. BCL cells were injected s.c. to establish localized xenografts in nude mice or i.v. to establish disseminated BCL in severe combined immunodeficient (scid) mice. I.p. treatment with rituximab or its calicheamicin conjugates was initiated and its effect on s.c. BCL growth or survival of mice with disseminated BCL was monitored. Conjugation of calicheamicin to rituximab vastly enhanced its growth inhibitory activity against BCL in vitro. Conjugation to calicheamicin had no deleterious effect on the effector functional activity of rituximab. Calicheamicin conjugated to rituximab with an acid-labile linker exhibited greater anti-tumor activity against s.c. BCL xenografts and improved survival of mice with disseminated BCL over that of unconjugated rituximab. Anti-tumor activities of rituximab conjugated to calicheamicin via an acid-stable linker were similar to that of unconjugated rituximab. Superior anti-tumor efficacy exhibited by a calicheamicin immunoconjugate of rituximab with an acid-labile linker over that of rituximab demonstrates the therapeutic potential of CD20-specific antibody-targeted chemotherapy strategy in the treatment of B-NHL.

Aminoglycosides↗
PubMed2005

Analysis of changes in CD20, CD55, and CD59 expression on established rituximab-resistant B-lymphoma cell lines.

Rituximab has markedly improved treatment results for B-cell lymphoma, but there are resistance problems similar to those of other chemotherapy drugs. With regard to the acquisition of rituximab resistance, there have been several reports describing the relation between rituximab and complement regulatory factors or CD20, but many points remain unclear. To further investigate acquisition of resistance to rituximab-related complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), we established rituximab-resistant B-lymphoma cell lines (RAMOS) in vitro and then analyzed expression of CD20, CD55, and CD59 on these resistant cells by flow cytometry. With repeated exposure to a low concentration of rituximab and complement, RAMOS cells gradually acquired rituximab resistance, and selection and increase of CD55(bright) and CD59(bright) cell populations due to rituximab-related CDC were observed. With repeated exposure to a high concentration of rituximab and complement, RAMOS cells promptly acquired rituximab resistance, and CD20 expression of RAMOS cells was decreased. Not only selection of CD20(dim) cells but also down-modulation of CD20 caused by rituximab-related CDC appeared to cause the decrease in CD20 expression. We believe our findings will prove to be useful for prevention of or release from rituximab resistance in cases of B-cell lymphoma.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2005

Pharmacokinetic behavior of rituximab: a study of different schedules of administration for heterogeneous clinical settings.

This study was designed to report the pharmacokinetic behavior of Rituximab in patients affected with different diseases and treated with different schedules of administration. A low tumor burden was a common feature of all patients (N=48) included in our study, whereas the timing of Rituximab administration varied from weekly (groups 1, 2, 3) to monthly (group 4). Group 1 included patients with follicular lymphoma treated with 4 weekly doses of Rituximab after first-line chemotherapy with CHOP. At the start of Rituximab, patients were in partial or complete clinical response but showed persistence of disease at molecular level (bcl-2-positive) in bone marrow and/or peripheral blood. Patients in group 2 had autoimmune disorders and Rituximab was given to act on B-cells, interfering with their production of autoantibodies. In patients with amyloidosis (group 3), Rituximab was given to kill progenitor B-cells of the small clone terminating in amyloid-producing plasma cells. In groups 2 and 3, the target of monoclonal antibody was a population of small B cells, which make an intrinsic feature of the diseases. Group 4 included patients with relapsed or refractory follicular and mantle cell lymphoma who underwent a salvage program of immunochemotherapy, purging in vivo and autotransplant: the first of the six planned doses of Rituximab was administered after a debulking phase with a third-generation regimen, such as VACOP-B. An enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) developed and validated in our laboratory was used for the pharmacokinetic study. Rituximab disposition was characterized by a 2-exponential decay, with a long elimination half-life of approximately 3 weeks (range, 248-859 hours). The total systemic clearance ranged between 3.1 and 11.9 mL/hr/m. After 4 weekly infusions, Rituximab concentration was approximately 2.5 microg/mL, which is approximately 85% of the steady-state level. Steady-state plasma concentrations of Rituximab were reached after 6 to 8 weekly infusions. The adopted pharmacokinetic model (2-compartment open model) seems to provide the best fit of Rituximab disposition both during and after treatment, even when different schedules of drug administration are used. Because several studies reported an association between response and serum Rituximab concentrations, a treatment based on a pharmacokinetic model may be useful for predicting the desired drug concentration.

Amyloidosis↗
PubMed2003

Transient down-modulation of CD20 by rituximab in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Lymphoid cells in most patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), when treated with rituximab, become CD20-. This is thought to be due to masking of CD20 by rituximab. We used specific antimouse immunoglobulin antibodies to detect rituximab on the surface of CLL lymphocytes and we demonstrate that rituximab is rarely detectable after therapy. Only 3 of 65 patients with CLL had rituximab detectable on their lymphocytes after rituximab therapy despite the fact that most had no detectable CD20 expression. In vitro mixing of CLL or Raji cells with rituximab demonstrated that rituximab was detectable on the surface of cells due to its binding to CD20. However, the addition of plasma led to the down-modulation of CD20 expression, and the rituximab became undetectable. This down-modulation of CD20 protein expression was associated with a down-modulation of CD20 mRNA. CLL cells that lost their CD20 expression regained CD20 expression after 24 hours in culture. These data suggest that rituximab therapy leads to a substantial but transient down-modulation of CD20 expression and that negativity for CD20 in cells from patients treated with rituximab is not necessarily due to CD20 masking. The importance of this down-modulation in the efficacy of current therapy with rituximab needs further investigation.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2005

Maximizing therapeutic benefit of rituximab: maintenance therapy versus re-treatment at progression in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma--a randomized phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network.

PURPOSE: To compare the benefit of maintenance rituximab therapy versus rituximab re-treatment at progression in patients with previously treated indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1998 and August 2002, 114 patients who had received previous chemotherapy for indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated with a standard 4-week course of rituximab. Patients with objective response or stable disease were randomly assigned to receive either maintenance rituximab therapy (standard 4-week courses administered at 6-month intervals) or rituximab re-treatment at the time of lymphoma progression. The duration of rituximab benefit was measured from the date of first rituximab treatment until the date other treatment was required. RESULTS: Ninety (79%) of 114 patients had objective response or stable disease after initial rituximab treatment, and were randomly assigned to treatment. Progression-free survival was prolonged in the maintenance group (31.3 v 7.4 months; P = .007). Final overall and complete response rates were higher in the maintenance group. Duration of rituximab benefit was similar in the maintenance and re-treatment groups (31.3 v 27.4 months, respectively). More maintenance patients remain in continuous remission, and more are currently in complete remission. Both treatment approaches were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In patients who have objective response or stable disease with single-agent rituximab therapy, duration of rituximab benefit is substantially prolonged with either scheduled maintenance treatment or rituximab re-treatment at the time of progression. At present, the magnitude of benefit with either approach appears similar. However, additional follow-up of this trial is required, and completion of phase III randomized trials is necessary to definitively answer this question.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Epratuzumab, a CD22-targeting recombinant humanized antibody with a different mode of action from rituximab.

Epratuzumab is a humanized anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody currently in clinical trials for treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and certain autoimmune diseases. Here we report the results of investigations of epratuzumab's mode of action in comparison to and in combination with the anti-CD20 mAb, rituximab. In vitro cell growth inhibition, induction of apoptosis, and the ability of the mAbs to mediate complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) were evaluated. We also investigated the potential activity of epratuzumab in the regulation of B-cell antigen receptor (BCR) activation. Epratuzumab and rituximab displayed very distinct modes of action; epratuzumab acts as an immunomodulatory agent, while rituximab is an acutely cytotoxic therapeutic antibody. Epratuzumab has distinct effects on cell growth from rituximab. For example, rituximab+anti-human IgG Fcgamma yielded marked inhibition of proliferation in human NHL cell lines, while epratuzumab had little or no effect in this assay. However, when cells were immobilized and stimulated with anti-IgM, epratuzumab, but not rituximab, caused a significant antiproliferative effect. Unlike rituximab, no CDC could be detected, and ADCC was modest but significant with epratuzumab. Importantly, combining rituximab and epratuzumab did not decrease rituximab's ability to induce apoptosis, CDC, and ADCC. In fact, the combination is more effective than rituximab alone in inhibiting proliferation of Daudi Burkitt lymphoma cells in the presence of second antibody, and at least equally effective to rituximab in the absence of crosslinking. These observations suggest that it may be possible to enhance clinical efficacy by combination therapy comprised of anti-CD20 and anti-CD22 mAbs.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2004

Efficacy of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: An open-label study indicated that selective depletion of B cells with the use of rituximab led to sustained clinical improvements for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. To confirm these observations, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. METHODS: We randomly assigned 161 patients who had active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate to receive one of four treatments: oral methotrexate (> or =10 mg per week) (control); rituximab (1000 mg on days 1 and 15); rituximab plus cyclophosphamide (750 mg on days 3 and 17); or rituximab plus methotrexate. Responses defined according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) were assessed at week 24 (primary analyses) and week 48 (exploratory analyses). RESULTS: At week 24, the proportion of patients with 50 percent improvement in disease symptoms according to the ACR criteria, the primary end point, was significantly greater with the rituximab-methotrexate combination (43 percent, P=0.005) and the rituximab-cyclophosphamide combination (41 percent, P=0.005) than with methotrexate alone (13 percent). In all groups treated with rituximab, a significantly higher proportion of patients had a 20 percent improvement in disease symptoms according to the ACR criteria (65 to 76 percent vs. 38 percent, P< or =0.025) or had EULAR responses (83 to 85 percent vs. 50 percent, P< or =0.004). All ACR responses were maintained at week 48 in the rituximab-methotrexate group. The majority of adverse events occurred with the first rituximab infusion: at 24 weeks, serious infections occurred in one patient (2.5 percent) in the control group and in four patients (3.3 percent) in the rituximab groups. Peripheral-blood immunoglobulin concentrations remained within normal ranges. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment, a single course of two infusions of rituximab, alone or in combination with either cyclophosphamide or continued methotrexate, provided significant improvement in disease symptoms at both weeks 24 and 48.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2006

Delayed-onset peripheral blood cytopenia after rituximab: frequency and risk factor assessment in a consecutive series of 77 treatments.

The occurrence of unexplained peripheral blood cytopenia, particularly neutropenia, has been recently reported after rituximab. Its prevalence may be underestimated since it may occur late after treatment. This study analysed all cases of unexplained delayed-onset peripheral blood cytopenia of WHO grade II - IV occurring in an unselected series of patients treated with rituximab in order to evaluate its prevalence and clinical significance. Seventy-seven courses of rituximab (corresponding to 317 rituximab infusions) given to 72 consecutive patients affected by non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and treated at a single Center with rituximab, alone (nine cases), associated with chemotherapy (50) or with chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (18) were evaluated. Twenty-three cases of cytopenia (29.8%) were observed. Neutropenia developed in 21 cases (27.3%), thrombocytopenia in eight (10.4%), anemia in four (5.2%). Multiple cytopenias were observed in nine cases. Neutropenia developed after a median of 10 weeks, anemia of 5 weeks and thrombocytopenia of 4 weeks after the last rituximab dose. Severe infections occurred in four of 21 neutropenic patients (19%), compared to two of 56 controls (3.6%) (p = 0.043). Cytopenia eventually resolved in nine of 18 evaluable cases after a median of 10 weeks (range 1 - 23). Age, sex, histology, bone marrow infiltration, hypogammaglobulinemia, previous chemotherapy, autologous stem cell transplant, rituximab schedule and timing, rituximab doses were analysed as predictors for cytopenia; by multivariate analysis only a previous treatment with chemotherapy and more than four rituximab doses were significantly associated with a higher risk of post-rituximab delayed cytopenia. Delayed-onset cytopenia, particularly neutropenia, is a clinically significant complication of rituximab treatment, which merits further investigation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Antilymphoma effects of anti-HLA-DR and CD20 monoclonal antibodies (Lym-1 and Rituximab) on human lymphoma cells.

AIM: Anti-HLA-DR and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have been effective for immunotherapy and radioimmunotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The aim of our study was to compare the antilymphoma effects of Lym-1 and rituximab in human lymphoma cell lines, using assays of viability, apoptosis, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), under conditions relevant to the clinic. METHODS: To characterize response relationships at varied concentrations of Lym-1 and rituximab, growth inhibition and cell death were assayed over 96 hours in four NHL cell lines derived from Burkitt's or large-cell lymphoma patients. Untreated cells and cells treated with an mLym-1 isotype-matched MAb were used as negative controls for direct assays. Western blot was used to detect apoptosis through the activation of caspase-3 and cleavage of poly (ADP-ribase) polymerase (PARP). The indirect cytotoxicity of Lym-1 and rituximab was assayed at varied concentrations, using ADCC activity in the presence of purified peripheral blood leukocytes and CDC activity in the presence of human donor serum. RESULTS: Lym-1 and rituximab showed significant direct and indirect antilymphoma effects. Lym-1 had a substantial, and statistically greater, effect than rituximab over longer intervals of time. In Raji and B35M cells, Lym-1 induced potent growth inhibition reflected by 90% and 94% reductions in viable cells, respectively, whereas rituximab induced 63% and 56% reductions. Concurrently, Lym-1 increased nonviable cells by 372% and 153% in these cells, respectively, whereas rituximab induced 139% and 43% increases. Lym-1-induced apoptosis was greater than that of rituximab in all cell lines tested. Lym-1, both the chimeric form and the mouse parent, mediate ADCC more effectively, in the presence of a total peripheral blood leukocyte (PBL) population, than does rituximab, although the results for CDC activity were mixed. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, Lym-1 had more potent direct and indirect cytotoxic effects than rituximab in lymphoma cells under conditions achievable in patients. Because the HLA-DR target antigen of Lym-1 is enriched on most B-cell lymphomas, these results support its complementary use in patients as an alternative to CD20 for monoimmunotherapy and for combination immunotherapy with rituximab, because the HLA-DR and CD20 antigens are physically and functionally coupled on human B cells.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2006

Antitumor efficacy of a combination of CMC-544 (inotuzumab ozogamicin), a CD22-targeted cytotoxic immunoconjugate of calicheamicin, and rituximab against non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma.

PURPOSE: CMC-544 is a CD22-targeted cytotoxic immunoconjugate, currently being evaluated in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL) patients. Rituximab is a CD20-targeted antibody commonly used in B-NHL therapy. Here, we describe antitumor efficacy of a combination of CMC-544 and rituximab against B-cell lymphoma (BCL) in preclinical models. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: BCLs were cultured in vitro with CMC-544, rituximab, or their combination. BCLs were injected either s.c. or i.v. to establish localized s.c. BCL in nude mice or disseminated BCL in severe combined immunodeficient mice, respectively. I.p. treatment with CMC-544 or rituximab was initiated at various times either alone or in combination and its effect on s.c. BCL growth or survival of mice with disseminated BCL was monitored. RESULTS: In vitro growth-inhibitory activity of CMC-544 combined with rituximab was additive. Rituximab but not CMC-544 exhibited effector functions, such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Rituximab was less effective in inhibiting growth of established BCL xenografts than developing xenografts. In contrast, CMC-544 was equally effective against both developing and established BCL xenografts. Although CMC-544 and rituximab individually caused partial inhibition of the growth of BCL xenografts at suboptimal doses examined, their combination suppressed xenograft growth by >90%. In a disseminated BCL model, 60% of CMC-544-treated mice and 20% of rituximab-treated mice survived for 125 days. In contrast, 90% of mice treated with the combination of CMC-544 and rituximab survived for longer than 125 days. CONCLUSION: The demonstration of superior antitumor activity of a combination of CMC-544 and rituximab described here provides the preclinical basis for its clinical evaluation as a treatment option for B-NHL.

Aminoglycosides↗