Dong, a non-long terminal repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposable element from Bombyx mori.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Animals↗
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “Retrotransposable elements”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
A single lineage of r2 retrotransposable elements is an active, evolutionarily stable component of the Drosophila rDNA locus.
R2 elements are non-long-terminal-repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons that insert specifically in the 28S rRNA genes of many insects. Previous reports concerning this element in the genus Drosophila have suggested that R2 elements are absent from many species of this genus, particularly those species from the subgenus Drosophila. In this report, we present an extensive study of the distribution and evolution of R2 elements in Drosophila. A PCR survey of 59 species from 23 species groups of the two major Drosophila subgenera found that R2 elements are present in all but two species of the melanogaster species subgroup. Phylogenetic analysis based on partial nucleotide sequences of R2 elements from 23 species demonstrates that the relationships of R2 elements are congruent with those of the Drosophila species phylogeny, suggesting that these elements have been vertically inherited since the divergence of this genus some 60 MYA. Sequence variation between different copies of R2 elements within each species was less than 0.16%, indicating that these elements are undergoing concerted evolution similar to that of the 28S genes. Several properties of the R2 sequences suggest that these elements depend on retrotransposition in addition to simple recombination to remain within the rDNA locus: the rates of synonymous substitutions averaged 4.8 times the rate of replacement substitutions, 82 of 83 R2 copies partially sequenced contained intact open reading frames, and, finally, length variation associated with the poly(A) 3' tails indicated that many R2 copies are the direct result of retrotransposition.
Animals↗
L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposable elements provide a "fossil" record of the phylogenetic history of murid rodents.
The single most difficult problem in phylogenetic analysis is deciding whether a shared taxonomic character is due to common ancestry or one that appeared independently due to convergence, parallelism, or reversion to an ancestral state. Mammalian L1 retrotransposons undergo periodic amplifications in which multiple copies of the elements are interspersed in the genome. Because these elements apparently are transmitted only by inheritance and are retained in the genome, a shared L1 amplification event can only be an inherited ancestral character. We propose that L1 amplification events can be an excellent tool for analyzing mammalian evolution and demonstrate here how we addressed several refractory problems in rodent systematics using L1 DNA as a taxonomic character.
Animals↗
Transposing without ends: the non-LTR retrotransposable elements.
Transposable elements have been discovered in animals, plants, fungi, and protozoans which contain open reading frames similar to the gag and pol genes of retroviruses and retrotransposons but which lack long terminal repeats (LTRs). Recent experiments have shown that these non-LTR elements [also called poly(A) type and LINE-like elements] encode functional reverse transcriptase and replicate via an RNA intermediate. Based on phylogenetic analysis of their encoded reverse transcriptase sequences, the non-LTR retrotransposons are the likely progenitors of retroviruses and LTR retrotransposons. Because retroviruses and LTR retrotransposons depend upon their LTRs for key steps in both transcription and integration, the mechanisms utilized by the non-LTR retrotransposons must be fundamentally different. Internal promoter sequences have been found in several non-LTR elements that initiate transcription upstream at the first nucleotide. Current models for retrotransposition of non-LTR elements propose that the 3' ends of staggered nicks at the chromosomal insertion site serve as primers for first- and second-staggered nicks at the chromosomal insertion site serve as primers for first- and second-strand synthesis from the RNA template. These models suggest that the enzymatic machinery of non-LTR elements is likely to be responsible for the integration of SINEs and processed pseudogenes.
Animals↗
The chromosomal distributions of Ty1-copia group retrotransposable elements in higher plants and their implications for genome evolution.
Retrotransposons make up a major fraction--sometimes more than 40%--of all plant genomes investigated so far. We have isolated the reverse transcriptase domains of the Ty1-copia group elements from several species, ranging in genome size from some 100 Mbp to 23,000 Mbp, and determined the distribution patterns of these retrotransposons on metaphase chromosomes and within interphase nuclei by DNA:DNA in situ hybridization. With some exceptions, the reverse transcriptase domains were distributed over the length of the chromosomes. Exclusion from rDNA sites and some centromeres (e.g., slash pine, 23,000 Mbp, or barley, 5500 Mbp) is frequent, whereas many species exclude retrotransposons from other sites of heterochromatin (e.g., intercalary and centromeric sites in broad bean). In contrast, in the plant Arabidopsis thaliana, widely used for plant molecular genetic studies because of its small genome (c. 100 Mbp), the Ty1-copia group reverse transcriptase gene domains are concentrated in the centromeric regions, colocalizing with the 180 bp satellite sequence pAL1. Unlike the pAL1 sequence, however, the Ty1-copia signal is also detectable as weaker, diffuse hybridization along the lengths of the chromosomes. Possible mechanisms for evolution of the contrasting distributions are discussed. Understanding the physical distribution of retrotransposons and comparisons of the distribution between species is critical to understanding their evolution and the significance for generation of the new patterns of variability and in speciation.
Chromosome Mapping↗
Characterization of transcripts from the Dictyostelium discoideum retrotransposable genetic element DRE.
All of the approximately 150 copies of the Dictyostelium discoideum retrotransposable element DRE are integrated 50 +/- 4 nucleotides upstream from different transfer RNA genes. These genomic regions are generally devoid of informative DNA why integration of the retrotransposon at these position never causes phenotypic mutations. This property makes DRE attractive as a tool in gene therapy where vectors with predictable integration specificities are still not available. Due to the nature as retrotransposon transcription is a prerequisite for the element to integrate at a new genomic position. Here we describe some transcription properties of DRE based on Northern blot analyses and on the characterization of in vitro synthesized cDNAs.
Animals↗
Two distinct subforms of the retrotransposable DRE element in NC4 strains of Dictyostelium discoideum.
Approximately 2% of the Dictyostelium discoideum genome consists of multiple copies of a retrotransposable element termed DRE (Dictyostelium Repetitive Element). These elements have always been found integrated in a position and orientation-specific manner 50 +/- 4 nucleotides upstream of the coding region of tRNA genes (tDNAs). An intact DRE is 5.7 kb long. It carries an extensive coding region flanked by non-identical long terminal repeats (LTRs), composed of three distinct modules A, B and C. The left LTR proximal to the tRNA gene contains one or several A-modules followed by a single B-module (AnB). By contrast, the right LTR is composed of a B-module followed by a C-module (BC). Approximately 50% of the DRE elements in NC4 derivatives of D. discoideum are structurally different from the 5.7 kb DRE described above. They carry the following alterations: a) a 3.1 kb deletion in the coding region; b) two small deletions of 8 and 29 nucleotides in the B-module of the right LTR; c) a 72 bp deletion in the B-C junction; and d) three distinct point mutations within the A-module of the left LTR. The deletion in the open reading frame encompasses the putative coding regions for reverse transcriptase adn integrase. At least 60 copies of this smaller 2.4 kb DRE subtype are found in the genome of D. discoideum NC4 strains associated with tRNA genes. Thus, inspite of their lack in reverse transcriptase and integrase those 2.4 kb elements are presumably transposable and at least all isolated copies are found exclusively in the proximity of tRNA gene loci. The enzymes needed for their replication and transposition are likely to be provided by the intact 5.7 kb DREs.
Animals↗
R4, a non-LTR retrotransposon specific to the large subunit rRNA genes of nematodes.
A 4.7 kb sequence-specific insertion in the 26S ribosomal RNA gene of Ascaris lumbricoides, named R4, is shown to be a non-long terminal repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposable element. The R4 element inserts at a site in the large subunit rRNA gene which is midway between two other sequence-specific non-LTR retrotransposable elements, R1 and R2, found in most insect species. Based on the structure of its open reading frame and the sequence of its reverse transcriptase domain, R4 elements do not appear to be a family of R1 or R2 elements that have changed their insertion site. R4 is most similar in structure and in sequence to the element Dong, which is not specialized for insertion into rRNA units. Thus R4 represents a separate non-LTR retrotransposable element that has become specialized for insertion in the rRNA genes of its host. Using oligonucleotide primers directed to a conserved region of the reverse transcriptase encoding domain, insertions in the R4 site were also amplified from Parascaris equorum and Haemonchus contortus. Why several non-LTR retrotransposable elements have become specialized for insertion into a short (87 bp) region of the large subunit rRNA gene is discussed.
Amino Acid Sequence↗
Cloning and expression of the human gene for transaldolase. A novel highly repetitive element constitutes an integral part of the coding sequence.
A novel highly repetitive retrotransposable element was cloned based on a limited sequence homology to the human T-cell leukemia virus and a related endogenous retroviral sequence, HRES-1. This repetitive element was found to constitute an integral part of the coding sequence of the human gene for transaldolase. In comparison with the intronless yeast gene, structural analysis of the human transaldolase genomic locus revealed that the human gene is comprised of five exons, second and third of which uniquely developed by insertion of a retrotransposable element. The 1329-base pair full-length cDNA, clone 4/2-4/1, contains an open reading frame coding for a protein of 336 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 38 kDa. This protein shows a 58% overall sequence homology with the 37-kDa yeast transaldolase. Antibodies raised against a 22-kDa recombinant polypeptide expressed from a 474-base pair 5' fragment of clone 4/2-4/1, containing repetitive exons 2 and 3, cross-reacted with yeast transaldolase and recognized the 38-kDa native human protein. Detection of a retrotransposon in the coding sequence of the human transaldolase gene demonstrates the importance of these repetitive elements in evolution of the eukaryotic genome.
Amino Acid Sequence↗
A new non-LTR retrotransposon provides evidence for multiple distinct site-specific elements in Crithidia fasciculata miniexon arrays.
We have identified a new member of the family of trypanosome site-specific retrotransposons, using a degenerate oligonucleotide PCR strategy. The 9595 bp element, termed Crithidia retrotransposable element 2 (CRE2), was cloned and found to be inserted in the tandemly arrayed miniexon genes of Crithidia fasciculata. The element is flanked by 29 bp target site duplications but lacks the 3' poly dA tract characteristic of most other non-long terminal repeat retrotransposons. The amino terminal region of the single 2518-codon open reading frame contains a putative metal-binding motif and a proline-rich region similar to gag-like domains of other retrotransposons. The carboxy terminal region of this open reading frame shares sequence homology with the reverse transcriptase and putative endonuclease regions of three previously described trypanosomatid site-specific retrotransposons. All four of these retrotransposons are specifically inserted between nucleotides 11 and 12 of the highly conserved 39mer sequence of the miniexon gene. Most copies of CRE2 and the previously characterized CRE1 are located on different sized chromosomes. Additional CRE-related sequences were identified by screening Crithidia libraries. These results suggest that a particular sequence in the C. fasciculata miniexon repeat is the target for multiple distinct site-specific retrotransposon insertions.
Amino Acid Sequence↗
A rapidly rearranging retrotransposon within the miniexon gene locus of Crithidia fasciculata.
The tandemly arrayed miniexon genes of the trypanosomatid Crithidia fasciculata are interrupted at specific sites by multiple copies of an inserted element. The element, termed Crithidia retrotransposable element 1 (CRE1), is flanked by 29-base-pair target site duplications and contains a long 3'-terminal poly(dA) stretch. A single 1,140-codon reading frame is similar in sequence to the integrase and reverse transcriptase regions of retroviral pol polyproteins. Cloned lines derived from a stock of C. fasciculata have unique arrangements of CRE1s. In different cloned lines, CRE1s, in association with miniexon genes, are located on multiple chromosomes. By examining the arrangement of CRE1s in subclones, we estimate that the element rearranges at a rate of ca. 1% per generation. These results indicate that the C. fasciculata miniexon locus is the target for a novel retrotransposon.
Amino Acid Sequence↗
Drosophila telomeres: new views on chromosome evolution.
In Drosophila, chromosome ends (telomeres) are composed of telomere-specific transposable elements (the retroposons HeT-A and TART). These elements are a bona fide part of the cellular machinery yet have many of the hallmarks of retrotransposable elements and retroviruses, raising the possibility that parasitic transposable elements and viruses might have evolved from mechanisms that the cell uses to maintain its chromosomes. It is striking that Drosophila, the model organism for many discoveries in genetics, development and molecular biology (including the classical concept of telomeres), should prove to have chromosome ends different from the generally accepted model. Studies of these telomere-specific retrotransposable elements raise questions about conventional wisdom concerning not only telomeres, but also transposable elements and heterochromatin.
Animals↗
Reverse transcription of R2Bm RNA is primed by a nick at the chromosomal target site: a mechanism for non-LTR retrotransposition.
R2 is a non-LTR retrotransposable element that inserts at a specific site in the 28S rRNA genes of most insects. We have expressed the open reading frame of the R2 element from Bombyx mori, R2Bm, in E. coli and shown that it encodes both sequence-specific endonuclease and reverse transcriptase activities. The R2 protein makes a specific nick in one of the DNA strands at the insertion site and uses the 3' hydroxyl group exposed by this nick to prime reverse transcription of its RNA transcript. After reverse transcription, cleavage of the second DNA strand occurs. A similar mechanism of insertion may be used by other non-LTR retrotransposable elements as well as short interspersed nucleotide elements.
Animals↗
A new retrotransposable human L1 element from the LRE2 locus on chromosome 1q produces a chimaeric insertion.
We have found a 2 kilobase insertion containing a rearranged L1 element in the dystrophin gene of a muscular dystrophy patient. We cloned the precursor of this insertion, the second known active human L1 element. The locus, LRE2, has one allele derived from the patient which matches the insertion sequence exactly. LRE2 has a perfect 13-15 bp target site duplication, two open reading frames, and an unusual 21 bp truncation of the 5' end, suggesting that a slightly truncated element can still retrotranspose. It differs from LRE1 by approximately 0.7%. There is an L1 element at LRE2 on approximately 66% of human chromosomes 1q, and the element is absent from chimpanzee and gorilla genomes. These data demonstrate that multiple active L1 elements exist in the human genome, and that a readthrough transcript of an active element is capable of retrotransposition.
Alleles↗
Anoxia, wound healing, VL30 elements, and the molecular basis of malignant conversion.
Although VL30 retrotransposable elements have been associated with certain cancers for nearly twenty years, because of their expression in rodent malignancies and recombination into murine sarcoma viruses, their causative role, if any, in cancer has been uncertain and enigmatic. Recent findings suggest loss of normal transcriptional control of specific VL30 element expression may make a critical contribution to tumor progression at a step associated with malignant conversion, by bringing into play a cellular program normally involved in wound healing. This program, the fibroblast anoxic response system, includes an adaptation to glycolytic metabolism, secretion of metalloproteinases, and activation of an endonuclease. While appropriate for facilitating debris removal during wound healing, loss of control of this program in a cell which has already progressed to the benign neoplastic state has the potential to simultaneously produce the invasiveness and genomic instability characteristic of malignancy. Examination of tumors and tumor derived cell lines has confirmed that key aspects of this system are in fact activated in cancer.
Animals↗
Analysis of the 5' junctions of R2 insertions with the 28S gene: implications for non-LTR retrotransposition.
R2 elements are non-long terminal repeat retrotransposable elements that insert into 28S rRNA genes of most insect species. The single open reading frame of R2 encodes a protein with both endonuclease activity, which cleaves the target site, and reverse transcriptase activity, which uses this cleavage to prime reverse transcription. This target-primed reverse transcription mechanism is also used by group II introns. Little is known of the mechanism by which the 5' end of R2 is integrated after reverse transcription. We have determined the 5' junction sequence of 94 R2 elements from 14 different species of Drosophila. Only 37% of the full-length elements contained precise 5' junctions; the remainder contained deletions of the 28S gene and/or insertions of additional sequences. Because the 5' junctions of truncated copies were similar to full-length elements, no sequences at the 5' end of R2 appear to be required for element integration. A model in which the R2 reverse transcriptase is capable of switching templates from the R2 RNA transcript to the upstream 28S gene can best explain the observed 5' junction sequences. This template jumping is analogous to the template switching of retroviral reverse transcriptases during formation of the double-stranded integration products.
Animals↗
Beta, a novel repetitive DNA element associated with tRNA genes in the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans.
We have identified a novel 399 bp repetitive DNA element (which we designate beta) 9bp upstream of a seryl-tRNA(CAG) gene in the genome of Candida albicans. There are two copies of the seryl-tRNA(CAG) gene, one on each homologue of chromosome VI, and the beta element is found upstream of one copy of the gene in C. albicans strain 2005E. The beta element is not present upstream of either copy of the seryl-tRNA(CAG) gene in eight other laboratory strains of C. albicans tested, but was detected in this location in several fresh clinical isolates. Southern blot analysis indicated that there are approximately eight copies of the beta element per diploid C. albicans genome and that it is a mobile element, being present on at least two different chromosomes. Three unique genomic DNA clones containing the beta element were isolated from strain 2005E; in each case, a different tRNA gene was found immediately adjacent to the beta element. Three new tRNA genes from C. albicans have thus been identified: tRNA(Asp), tRNA(Ala) and tRNA(Ile). The beta element shows no significant sequence homology to other known prokaryotic or eukaryotic repetitive elements, although an 8 bp repeat at the 3' end of the element is identical to that of the Ty3 retrotransposable element of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We propose that the beta element is a solo long terminal repeat (LTR) sequence of a Ty3/gypsy-like transposable element in C. albicans that is closely associated with tRNA genes.
Base Sequence↗
Sequence analysis of a small early chorion gene subfamily interspersed within the late gene locus in Bombyx mori.
A comprehensive sequence analysis of three early chorion genes (6F6.1, 6F6.2, 6F6.3) which form a small subfamily is presented. Two main features characterize this subfamily: (1) the 6F6 gene copies are beta-branch genes and, unlike typical chorion genes which are organized in divergent gene pairs, they are unpaired, and (2) they are not clustered in genetic locus Ch3 but are dispersed in Ch1-2, which is about 3 to 4 centiMorgans away and contains middle and late chorion genes. Sequence comparisons show that members of this subfamily exhibit high identity values in their major coding region (94-96%) and that similarities also extend, but to a lesser degree, into their noncoding regions. The putative 6F6 promoter regions have no significant similarities with the corresponding regions of other early beta-genes but quite surprisingly share common elements with middle and late genes. The main difference among the 6F6 gene introns is the presence of inserted sequences: the insert into 6F6.2 ("IR"; 248 bp) is flanked by a 102-103-bp inverted repeat, while those into 6F6.1 ("FIB"; 184 bp) and 6F6.3 ("HOPE"; 951 bp) are carried by a partial Bm1 element. HOPE has features of a non-LTR retrotransposable element. Preliminary experiments indicate that the copy number of IR and HOPE in the Bombyx mori genome is about 5,000 and 20,000, respectively. The great similarity of 6F6 genes cannot be accounted for by selective pressure but rather appears to be the result of gene-conversion-like events, which are supposed to operate frequently in middle and late chorion genes but not in other known early beta-genes. Using the relative position and orientation of the 6F6 gene copies, it is possible to propose an evolutionary scheme for the formation of chorion locus Ch1-2.
Animals↗