Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Resuscitation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

[A survey of 3,303 6th-year medical students from 36 universities concerning knowledge of resuscitation--more than 80% of medical students can not perform standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation?].

Questionnaires on knowledge of resuscitation were distributed to 3,303 6th-year medical school students from 36 universities. The questionnaire included 13 questions based on the 1992 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. From the 13 questions, each student was instructed to select 6 questions concerning assessment of consciousness level, method for confirming respiration, method for securing the airway, method for confirming circulation, pressure points for cardiac massage, and the ratio of respiration and cardiac massage. If all of these six questions could not be answered correctly, it was considered that the student was not able to perform resuscitation according to the guidelines. At least one incorrect answer was given to the six questions by 84% of students, indicating that most medical students are not able to actually perform standard resuscitation. Possible reasons for these results may be the lack of desire on the part of students to master resuscitation, confusion over new findings concerning resuscitation and guideline, insufficient understanding of the difference between the guidelines and new findings by educators, and restricted teaching time for resuscitation. Possible ways to improve the situation include efforts to make students more responsible to master resuscitation, efforts to enhance students' desire to learn, adoption of more practical education, inclusion of such questions in graduation examinations and the national examination for a medical license, adherence by educators to the guidelines, and efforts by educators to make a clear distinction between the guidelines and new findings. With new guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation due out in the year 2000, methods for teaching resuscitation should be reconsidered in order to ensure that all medical students can competently perform resuscitation.

Adult↗

Effects of blood resuscitation versus dextran resuscitation after hemorrhage on intrinsic myocardial function.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial function is altered by many factors present in hemorrhaged and resuscitated animals. The purpose of this study was to determine whether resuscitation after a short period of hemorrhagic shock, which by itself did not alter intrinsic cardiac function, causes dysfunction. METHODS: Guinea pigs were instrumented to measure blood pressure and cardiac output, and several days later 50% of their blood volume was removed at a rate of 1 mL/min. Some animals were resuscitated with the shed blood and some with 6% dextran. Hearts were studied 1 or 24 hours after resuscitation. RESULTS: Isolated hearts from animals after 1 hour of resuscitation demonstrated dysfunction whether resuscitated with blood or dextran, although dysfunction was more severe with blood resuscitation. By 24 hours, dysfunction was essentially reversed. CONCLUSIONS: Resuscitation after hemorrhagic shock caused injury to the myocardium independent of the hemorrhage. Blood resuscitation resulted in greater dysfunction than did resuscitation with dextran.

Animals↗

Decisions to terminate resuscitation. Resuscitation Committee.

To gain more insight into decision making around the termination of resuscitation (CPR), we studied factors which influenced the time before discontinuing resuscitation, and the criteria on which those decisions were based. These criteria were compared with those of the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and the American Heart Association (AHA). For this study, we reviewed the audiotapes of resuscitation attempts in a hospital. A total of 36 attempts were studied, involving 27 men and nine women, mean (S.D.) age 64 (18) years. A total of 19 patients received resuscitation on general wards, and 17 in the emergency room after an out-of-hospital circulatory arrest. The median interval time (range) from start to termination was 33 min (8-81 min). Results from multiple linear regression showed that a delay greater than 5 min in first advanced life support measures, drawing a sample for biochemical analysis, and the patient's response shown by return of spontaneous circulation were independently associated with the time of terminating resuscitation. The team used a number of criteria which can be found in the guidelines of the ERC and the AHA, but also used additional criteria. The ERC and the AHA criteria were not sufficient to cover all termination decisions. We conclude that the point in time to terminate resuscitation is not always rationally chosen. Updating of the current guidelines for terminating resuscitation and training resuscitation teams to use these guidelines is recommended.

Blood Circulation↗

Impact of do-not-resuscitate legislation on the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in three teaching hospitals.

Under New York State's unique do-not-resuscitate law, patients admitted to a hospital are assumed to consent to cardiopulmonary resuscitation unless a do-not-resuscitate order has been written in accordance with specific stipulations. This study was undertaken to determine if the law would significantly change the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The charts of 952 patients who died on the medical services of Bellevue, New York University, and New York Veterans hospitals during the 12-month periods before and after the law went into effect were reviewed. The proportion of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation was determined. To take into account the effects of potential confounders (ie, hospital, sex, race or ethnic group, age, diagnosis), a multiple logistic regression analysis was performed. The relative risk for cardiopulmonary resuscitation was found to be 0.81, (95% confidence interval: 0.59-1.10) after the law as compared with before, which was not statistically significant. Although patients with chronic or potentially reversible illness were much more likely than those with hopeless illness to undergo cardiopulmonary resuscitation (relative risk of 7.08 [3.23-15.54] and 12.89 [8.71-19.07], respectively), the data failed to show that the law had an impact on the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in any of the disease categories. Total use of formal do-not-resuscitate orders increased from 32.7% to 83.9% (p less than .0001), although at Bellevue, where documentation was high before the law, no further increase occurred.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Active compression-decompression resuscitation: effect on resuscitation success after in-hospital cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that active compression-decompression would improve resuscitation success in human subjects after cardiac arrest. BACKGROUND: Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a new method that improves cardiopulmonary hemodynamic function in animal models and humans after cardiac arrest. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest. Patients were assigned to receive standard manual or active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The primary study end points were spontaneous return of circulation, 24-h survival and survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Fifty-three consecutive patients after cardiac arrest undergoing 64 resuscitation attempts were studied (30 women, 23 men; mean [+/- SD] age 71 +/- 13 years, range 38 to 96). Spontaneous return of circulation was observed in 24 (47%) of 53 patients and was increased in patients receiving active compression-decompression compared with those receiving standard manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (15 [60%] of 25 vs. 9 [32%] of 28, respectively, p = 0.042); 24-h survival was increased (12 [48%] of 25 vs. 6 [21%] of 28, respectively, p = 0.041); and there was a trend toward improved survival to hospital discharge (6 [24%] of 25 vs. 3 [11%] of 28, respectively, p = 0.198) when active compression-decompression was compared with standard manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS: Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves return of spontaneous circulation and 24-h survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest. Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation appears to be a beneficial adjunct to standard manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Aged↗

Studies in shock and resuscitation, I: use of a hypertonic, albumin-containing, fluid demand regimen (HALFD) in resuscitation.

We have reevaluated and clinically tested the current concepts of shock and resuscitation on a logical, physiological, and physical basis. We have considered the currently accepted resuscitation paradigm which is based upon the thesis that early rapid resuscitation of "lost" fluid volume is mandatory and that adequacy of resuscitation can be evaluated by central venous pressure, PAP, PAWP, pulse rate, blood pressure, and/or urine volume. Such methods also accept as natural concomitants that capillary beds are "damaged by injury"; that they "leak" salt, fluid, and albumin; and that these are expected occurrences which are injury-related. We have also examined and clinically evaluated the thesis that MAP is a primary reflector of the relationships between volume and the size of the currently available functional vascular space. (Currently available functional vascular space is mediated through the baroreceptor (stretch receptor)/neuroendocrine mechanisms.) Under this hypothesis, fluid resuscitation comprises infusion of a volume per unit time given so as to replete currently measurable fluid losses and to normalize and/or sustain MAP and the normal osmolar and oncotic relationships at the capillary/tissue interface while holding hydrostatic pressure at normal. Using burn injury as a model, we compared statistically homogeneous, randomly selected groups of burn patients who were resuscitated using a hypotonic fluid (130 mOsm/liter) alone (group R: 7 patients), hypertonic fluid (240 mOsm/liter) alone group H: 5 patients), or the hypertonic fluid containing albumin (12.5 g/liter) (group A: 7 patients). The results indicate that significantly smaller volumes of fluid were needed to resuscitate the patients in group A with a significantly more rapid normalization of physical, physiological, and biochemical parameters. We conclude that the physically and physiologically appropriate method of resuscitation, demonstrated in burn injury, comprises the use of a fluid given at a rate: (1) to maintain mean arterial and hydrostatic pressures within normal range; (2) that delivers a volume per unit time which does not exceed the capacity of the currently available functional vascular space; (3) that replaces concurrent measurable fluid losses; (4) that is hypertonic (to normalize capillary/tissue osmotic gradients); and (5) that contains colloid (to normalize capillary/tissue osmotic gradients); and (5) that contains colloid (to normalize capillary/tissue oncotic gradients). We further conclude that salt, fluid, and colloid loss into the interstitium during resuscitation frequently is due to the rate delivered and/or the physical nature of the fluid used and not to capillary bed damage outside the zone of injury.

Adult↗