Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Reserpine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1987

Impairment of pancreatic acinar function by reserpine in vivo and in vitro.

Chronic reserpine treatment of animals, an experimental model for cystic fibrosis (CF), results in generalized exocrinopathy, impaired pancreatic secretion, and decreased pancreatic content of amylase. The mechanisms of altered acinar function and decreased amylase content in both CF and the reserpine-treated rat are unknown. To examine this alteration, the rate of [3H]phenylalanine (phe) incorporation into cellular protein was determined in pancreatic acinar cells after reserpine treatment of rats in vivo (7 d) and of cells in vitro (1 to 24 h). Acinar cells isolated from control, chronic reserpine-treated, and pair-fed rats were incubated in vitro with 0, 30, 50, or 100 microM reserpine. Reserpine treatment in vitro for 24 h of acinar cells from control rats significantly decreased amylase activity (20 to 70%), an effect similar to that of reserpine treatment in vivo. In vivo, reserpine treatment decreased [3H]phe incorporation (disintegrations per minute per milligram protein) 56% in freshly isolated cells, but did not alter intracellular specific activity (disintegrations per minute per nanomole phe, SA) of [3H]phe. Reserpine treatment (30 and 50 microM) in vitro for 1 h also decreased [3H]phe incorporation by freshly isolated cells from control (53 to 85%) and pair-fed (40 to 68%) rats. Reserpine treatment for 24 h in vitro significantly decreased [3H]phe incorporation by cells from control (82 and 98%), pair-fed (80 and 95%), and chronic reserpine-treated (90 and 97%) rats as compared with cells from respective in vivo treatments cultured with no reserpine. In vitro reserpine treatment also decreased the intracellular SA of [3H]phe in freshly isolated cells from control (14 and 36%) and pair-fed (35 and 39%) rats and in cultured cells from control (11 and 86%), pair-fed (60 and 88%), and chronic reserpine-treated (49 and 76%) rats. However, these alterations of SA by reserpine did not account for the decreased incorporation of [3H]phe into acinar protein, which remained significantly lower (70 to 88%) when expressed as total phe incorporation. These results suggest that reserpine acts directly on acinar cells to alter function and that the ability of the pancreas to synthesize digestive enzymes may be impaired in this model of cystic fibrosis.

Amylases↗
PubMed1976

The biological fate of reserpine.

Orally administered reserpine is readily absorbed from the GI tract. During this process at least a portion of the drug is metabolized by the intestinal mucosa and then presumably is acted upon by serum esterases. Methylreserpate and trimethoxybenzoic acid are the primary metabolites which result from the hydrolytic cleavage of reserpine. Since most of the blood leaving the GI tract passes through the liver via the portal vein, hepatic metabolism would also be expected to reduce reserpine levels in the blood. The relative contributions of serum esterases versus hepatic metabolism in the biotransformation of reserpine in vivo are not known. However, very little unmetabolized reserpine is eventually eliminated in the urine. In the liver, it is quite likely that both microsomal oxidative and hydrolytic enzymes contribute to the metabolism of reserpine. It seems that microsomal oxidation (such as the demethylation of the 4-methoxy group on the TMBA moiety) must precede hydrolysis since inhibition of demethylation markedly reduces the rate of hydrolysis. In addition to oxidation and hydrolysis, conjugative reactions also must occur in liver or extrahepatic tissues since both glucuronide and sulfate conjugates of TMBA have been identified. Some reserpine molecules do seem to escape metabolism, however, since significant amounts of intact reserpine have been found in fecal samples taken from both experimental animals and human beings after either oral or parenteral drug administration. Presumably reserpine is transported from the blood via the biliary tree into the small intestine where it is either reabsorbed or eliminated in the feces. Pulmonary elimination of CO2 produced after complete oxidation of the 4-methoxy group of TMBA has also been shown to occur both in vivo and in vitro. The following may serve as a model for the relationship between the subcellular distribution of reserpine and its site of action. After a single intravenous injection most of the reserpine, probably loosely bound to plasma albumin, is distributed to tissues on the basis of their blood flow. Because of its lipophilic properties, reserpine would easily penetrate cell membranes and then bind possibly electrostatically to intracellular membrane components, particularly those rich in phospholipids. Much of the circulating reserpine would then either be metabolized or be taken up by the lipid depots of the body, leading to a rapid redistribution of the reversibly bound reserpine from the tissues. During this time a relatively small fraction of the total reserpine administered by injection would become associated with monoaminergic granular membranes in a more specific and irreversible manner. This would result in a persistent, nonstoichiometric inhibition of monoamine uptake. Such a small specific binding would not be detectable for at least 18 hr after reserpine administration, i.e., until most of the reversibly bound alkaloid had been metabolized and/or excreted...

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Anti-immobility activity of different antidepressant drugs using the tail suspension test in normal or reserpinized mice.

The tail suspension test is a screening procedure recently used in mice to detect antidepressant activity of drugs. The ability of amine re-uptake inhibitors to decrease immobility in non-reserpinized and in reserpinized mice was studied. Reserpine (4 mg/kg ip) was injected 4 h previously. Anti-depressants were administered ip, 60 min before tail suspension. Animal activity was recorded for 6 min. Preferential serotonin re-uptake blockers (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, clomipramine) were poorly active in non-reserpinized mice and inactive in reserpine-treated mice. Noradrenergic drugs (desipramine, demexiptiline, viloxazine) were more efficient in reserpinized than in non-reserpinized mice. The mixed serotonin-noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitor (imipramine) shows an activity which should be considered between serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitors. DA re-uptake inhibitors (amineptine, GBR 12909) exhibited the highest anti-immobility effect in non reserpinized animals but were of low efficacy after reserpine treatment. Amphetamine differed from dopamine re-uptake inhibitors by its better activity in reserpinized animals. Moreover, it was the only drug showing an equal anti-immobility effect in non reserpinized and reserpinized mice because the dose of 8 mg/kg of amphetamine reduced immobility in reserpinized mice with the same intensity as the dose of 4 mg/kg in non reserpinized mice whereas no other drugs tested in this study achieved the same effect. Comparison of anti-immobility activities of putative anti-depressants in non-pre-treated and in reserpine-pre-treated mice, using the tail suspension test, may be useful to discriminate amphetamines from antidepressant drugs and to differentiate between categories of amine re-uptake blockers.

Amphetamine↗
PubMed1998

Reserpine attenuates D-amphetamine and MDMA-induced transmitter release in vivo: a consideration of dose, core temperature and dopamine synthesis.

Amphetamine releases dopamine through a transporter-mediated mechanism. The purpose of this report was to further our understanding of the intracellular pool from which amphetamine releases dopamine: the cytoplasmic pool, the vesicular pool, or both. Rats were treated with D-amphetamine (AMPH) (1.0 or 10.0 mg/kg) or an amphetamine analog, methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) (2.0, 5.0, or 10.0 mg/kg). Pre-treatment with 10.0 mg/kg reserpine (18 h prior to AMPH or MDMA) attenuated dopamine release for high and low AMPH doses; however the low-dose effect showed borderline significance. Pre-treatment with 10.0 mg/kg reserpine attenuated dopamine and serotonin release induced by MDMA. The dopamine effect was seen at all three MDMA doses; the effect on serotonin was only measured at the 10.0 mg/kg dose. Reserpine pre-treatment caused reductions in core body temperature; heating the rats to normal body temperature for 3 h prior to AMPH or MDMA, and during the 4 h post-treatment period partially reversed the reserpine-induced attenuation of dopamine release. However, the intermediate level of dopamine release for the reserpinized-heated animals was not significantly different from either the reserpine group (not heated) or the AMPH or MDMA alone groups. In a separate group of rats, the effects of reserpine and reserpine+heat on dopamine synthesis were measured. DOPA accumulation after treatment with the aromatic acid decarboxylase inhibitor NSD-1015 (100 mg/kg, 30 min before sacrifice), was greater in rats treated with reserpine compared to controls; heating the reserpinized rats did not significantly alter the amount of DOPA accumulation; however there was a trend towards further increase. These results suggest that D-amphetamine releases dopamine that is stored in both vesicles and the cytoplasm. Cooling may contribute to the attenuation of AMPH or MDMA-induced dopamine release observed after reserpine; however, AMPH or MDMA dependence upon vesicular stores most likely explains the diminished release after reserpine. The attenuation of AMPH or MDMA-induced transmitter release by reserpine is thought to be counteracted by a reserpine-induced replenishment of stores. Therefore, all doses of D-amphetamine may use vesicular stores; the degree to which new synthesis counteracts the vesicular depletion may be the variable which differentiates low from high doses of D-amphetamine.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Motor activation in short- and long-term reserpinized mice: role of N-methyl-D-aspartate, dopamine D1 and dopamine D2 receptors.

The effects of dopamine D1 and dopamine D2 receptor agonists and of subconvulsant doses of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, dizocilpine (MK-801), alone and in combination, on the motor activity of short- and long-term reserpinized mice (mice pretreated with 5 mg/kg reserpine 4 h or 20 h before, respectively) were analyzed. With short-term reserpinization, the dopamine D2 receptor agonist, quinpirole (1.5 mg/kg), but not the dopamine D1 receptor agonist, SKF-38393 (15 mg/kg), increased motor activity. The effect of quinpirole in short-term reserpinized mice was potentiated by the simultaneous administration of SKF-38393 (15 mg/kg) and was counteracted by the previous administration of the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, raclopride (1 mg/kg), or by the simultaneous administration of NMDA (25 mg/kg) or MK-801 (0.5 mg/kg). Neither NMDA (25-100 mg/kg) nor MK-801 (0.5-3 mg/kg) induced motor activation in short-term reserpinized mice. With long-term reserpinization, either quinpirole (1.5 mg/kg) or SKF-38393 (15 mg/kg) increased motor activity. The effect of quinpirole in long-term reserpinized mice was not potentiated by the concurrent administration of SKF-38393 (15 mg/kg), was inhibited by the simultaneous administration of MK-801 (0.5 mg/kg) and was not modified by NMDA (25 mg/kg). The effect of SKF-38393 (15 mg/kg) in long-term reserpinized mice was inhibited by the concomitant administration of MK-801 (0.5 mg/kg) and was slightly antagonized by NMDA (25 mg/kg). NMDA induced motor activation in long-term reserpinized mice at doses which were similar to those causing motor activation in non-reserpinized mice (75 and 100 mg/kg), while MK-801 induced motor activation at a dose which was associated with motor depression in non-reserpinized mice (2 mg/kg). The NMDA-induced motor activation in long-term reserpinized mice was counteracted by the previous administration of a low dose of MK-801 (0.5 mg/kg) and was still present when a stronger dopamine-depleting pretreatment was used. These results are interpreted on the basis of changes in sensitivity of the direct striatal efferent pathway after long-term reserpinization.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Ebselen attenuates reserpine-induced orofacial dyskinesia and oxidative stress in rat striatum.

Reserpine-induced orofacial dyskinesia is an alleged animal model of tardive dyskinesia whose pathophysiology has been related to striatal oxidative stress. In the present investigation, the authors examined whether ebselen, an antioxidant organochalcogen with glutathione peroxidase-like activity, changes the behavioral and neurochemical effect of acute reserpine administration. Reserpine injection for 3 days every other day caused a significant increase on the tongue protrusion frequency and ebselen (30 mg/kg ip for 4 days, starting 1 day before reserpine) reversed partially the effect of reserpine (P<.05). Reserpine- and reserpine+ebselen-treated groups displayed an increase in vacuous chewing frequency when compared to control and ebselen-treated groups (P<.05) Reserpine increased the duration of facial twitching and ebselen reversed partially the effect of reserpine (P<.01). Reserpine increased significantly the thiobarbituric acid-reactive species (TBARS) levels, and ebselen reversed the effect of reserpine on TBARS production in rat striatum. The results of the present study clearly indicated that ebselen has a protective role against reserpine-induced orofacial dyskinesia and reversed the increase in TBARS production caused by reserpine administration. Consequently, the use of ebselen as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia should be considered.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗
PubMed1988

Low concentration of reserpine accelerates actin polymerization via interaction with G-actin.

The effect of reserpine on actin polymerization was examined by measurement of the changes in high shear viscosity and by electron microscopic observation of the actin solution. In the presence of low concentrations of reserpine, the time course of actin polymerization was accelerated dose dependently (up to approximately 0.5 nM), without affecting the final level of viscosity. The effect of reserpine rather decreased with dosages over this concentration. The binding of reserpine to actin was tested by developing the mixture of G- or F-actin and [3H]reserpine through a Sephadex G-50 column. A portion of the reserpine coeluted with G-actin, but little reserpine did with F-actin. This means that reserpine bound to G-actin but scarcely to F-actin. The binding of reserpine to G-actin was also confirmed using the method of photoaffinity labeling. After the irradiation of the mixed G-actin and [3H]reserpine by ultraviolet light, they were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by fluorography. It was demonstrated that reserpine was bound to G-actin covalently by the ultraviolet light irradiation. This indicated the close interaction of reserpine with G-actin. Thus, the effect of reserpine on actin polymerization seemed to be exerted via interaction with G-actin.

Actins↗