SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Repression domains”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2025

Mapping early PRC2 nucleation sites upon Suz12 reintroduction reveals features of de novo Polycomb recruitment.

Polycomb domains safeguard cell identity by maintaining lineage-specific chromatin states enriched in repressive histone modifications, preserving the epigenetic memory of cell lineages. While Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) can re-establish its occupancy after perturbation, the mechanisms that guide de novo Polycomb recruitment remain unclear. To address this, we engineered an auxin-inducible degradation system to reversibly deplete and reintroduce the endogenous PRC2 core subunit Suz12 in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). Genome-wide profiling at an early recovery time point revealed ~1,100 PRC2 nucleation sites, characterized by rapid Suz12 and histone H3K27me3 re-accumulation with strong signal, with minimal impact on gene expression. These sites were significantly enriched at bivalent promoters, coinciding with unmethylated CpG islands and chromatin states associated with developmental regulation, and were largely conserved in differentiated cells. Motif analysis identified G/C-rich DNA sequences associated with E2F and zinc-finger proteins, alongside strong co-occupancy with MTF2 and JARID2, two PRC2 cofactors previously implicated in Polycomb targeting. Notably, a subset of nucleation sites overlapped with long-range chromatin interaction anchors in histone H3K27me3 HiChIP datasets. These findings reveal that PRC2 de novo nucleation sites are associated with a combination of chromatin states, DNA sequence features, cofactor co-occupancy and spatial genome organization, suggesting that epigenetic memory can be re-established through defined genomic and chromatin features.

Epigenetic memory↗

PubMed2026

An expanded realm of anti-CRISPR-associated proteins and regulatory mechanisms.

Many bacteriophages encode anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins that inhibit bacterial CRISPR-Cas immune systems. Rapid acr gene expression upon phage entry enables CRISPR-Cas neutralization but can impact phage fitness if unregulated. Therefore, Acr production is often controlled by distinct families of co-encoded anti-CRISPR-associated (Aca) proteins, which are usually helix-turn-helix (HTH) regulators that bind DNA within acr-aca operon promoters. Previously, we demonstrated that the Aca2 family additionally represses Acr production translationally by binding structured RNA motifs within the 5' untranslated region (UTR) of the acr-aca mRNA. Here, through systematic bioinformatic analyses, we provide evidence of structured RNA motifs in the 5' UTRs of operons encoding members of other Aca families and show that Aca1 also specifically binds its cognate RNA motif. Additionally, many Aca proteins are predicted to regulate not only their own but also adjacent operons with potential anti-defence genes. Indeed, we show that Aca14, newly identified in this study, represses two predicted anti-defence operons. Aca14 is a ribbon-helix-helix domain protein, revealing regulatory diversity beyond the canonical HTH Aca family members. Collectively, our findings expand our understanding of acr regulation in mobile genetic elements and reveal novel mechanisms by which phages fine-tune anti-defence gene expression.

5' Untranslated Regions↗

PubMed2025

Homeobox protein MSX-1 restricts hepatitis B virus by promoting ubiquitin-independent proteasomal degradation of HBx protein.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) X protein (HBx) is a key factor for regulating viral transcription and replication. We recently characterized homeobox protein MSX-1 (MSX1) as a host restriction factor that inhibits HBV gene expression and genome replication by directly binding to HBV enhancer II/core promoter (EnII/Cp) and suppressing its promoter and enhancer activities. Notably, HBx expression was observed to be repressed more drastically by MSX1 compared to other viral antigens. In this work, we report that in addition to transcriptional repression, MSX1 also post-transcriptionally downregulates HBx protein stability. Mechanistically, MSX1 induces ubiquitin-independent proteasomal degradation of HBx, which is mediated through HBx C-terminal domain. Furthermore, this effect on HBx degradation correlates with MSX1-induced upregulation of DNAJA4 and CRYAB expression. Similar to MSX1, both DNAJA4 and CRYAB promote HBx degradation and repress HBV gene expression and genome replication. In chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, immune active phase (IA) is associated with higher intrahepatic expression of MSX1, DNAJA4 and CRYAB, and lower serum HBV markers compared to immune tolerant (IT) phase. Finally, HBV infection is significantly suppressed by MSX1 overexpression in both NTCP-overexpressing cell and humanized liver mouse models. These results demonstrate additional and novel mechanisms of MSX1-mediated repression of HBV, and establish MSX1 as a multi-functional HBV restriction factor with therapeutic potential.

Humans↗

PubMed1979

The glucocorticoid domain of response: measurement of pleiotropic cellular responses by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.

In this article, we have provided two examples of pleiotropic regulation by specific effector molecules as assayed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. In one case, catabolite repression in the bacterium Escherichia coli was examined by measuring the response to cyclic cAMP. In the other, the effect of dexamethasone on the rate of synthesis of over a thousand cell proteins was analyzed in HTC cells. It was found that in E. coli, cAMP regulates the synthesis of about 10 percent of the cell's proteins; both inductions and repressions are observed, but inductions clearly predominate. In HTC cells, dexamethasone induces the synthesis of seven proteins, or about 0.7 percent of the total cellular proteins; repression was not consistently observed. In another rat hepatoma line (FAZA) a similar number but essentially different set of proteins was induced. These data are discussed in terms of the notion of domains of response originally proposed by TOMKINS [1].

Animals↗

PubMed2026

Study of NSD2 using a dTAG system reveals its molecular mechanism and oncogenic implications in t(4;14) multiple myeloma.

The histone H3 lysine 36 dimethylation (H3K36me2) methyltransferase NSD2 is deleted in Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome and is aberrantly expressed in 10% to 15% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) because of a t(4;14) translocation. Although NSD2 is thought to be a primary driver in MM, the exact molecular mechanisms by which it regulates transcription remain unclear. We applied the degradation tag (dTAG) system to acutely degrade NSD2 and used this, in combination with time-resolved thiol-linked alkylation for the metabolic sequencing of RNA (SLAM-seq), to identify 307 transcriptional targets of NSD2. Reconstitution with either wild-type NSD2 or a catalytically inactive mutant (NSD2Y1179A) showed that NSD2's transcriptional effects are almost exclusively dependent on its SET domain activity. Mechanistically, H3K36me2 deposition by NSD2 antagonizes H3K27me3 levels, and treatment with 2 distinct Polycomb repressive complex 2 inhibitors demonstrated that approximately half of the NSD2 target genes are regulated in an H3K27me3-dependent manner. Cleavage under targets and tagmentation (CUT&Tag) analysis showed that upon NSD2 depletion, there was an increase in H3K27me3 that occurred at genome-wide intergenic regions rather than at the promoters or gene bodies of NSD2 target genes. These data suggest that NSD2, via H3K36me2, antagonizes H3K27me3 deposition likely at distal regulatory elements, including enhancers, creating a chromatin landscape favorable for target gene transcription. Importantly, NSD2 target genes were enriched for key oncogenic pathways, and 24 transcription factors (TFs) implicated in neurodevelopment and acute leukemia, consistent with its role in Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome and MM. Eight of these TFs are known oncogenic drivers in acute leukemia or MM, highlighting a novel molecular mechanism for NSD2's role in t(4;14) MM.

Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase↗

PubMed2025

Nuclear and cytosolic J-domain proteins provide synergistic control of Hsf1 at distinct phases of the heat shock response.

The heat shock response (HSR) is the major defense mechanism against proteotoxic stress in the cytosol and nucleus of eukaryotic cells. Initiation and attenuation of the response are mediated by stress-dependent regulation of heat shock transcription factors (HSFs). Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a single HSF (Hsf1), facilitating the analysis of HSR regulation. Hsf1 is repressed by Hsp70 chaperones under non-stress conditions and becomes activated under proteotoxic stress, directly linking protein damage and its repair to the HSR. J-domain proteins (JDPs) are essential for targeting of Hsp70s to their substrates, yet the specific JDP(s) regulating Hsf1 and connecting protein damage to HSR activation remain unclear. Here, we show that the yeast nuclear JDP Apj1 primarily controls the attenuation phase of the HSR by promoting Hsf1's displacement from heat shock elements in target DNA. In apj1Δ cells, HSR attenuation is significantly impaired. Additionally, yeast cells lacking both Apj1 and the major JDP Ydj1 exhibit increased HSR activation even in non-stress conditions, indicating their distinct regulatory roles. Apj1's role in both nuclear protein quality control and Hsf1 regulation underscores its role in directly linking nuclear proteostasis to HSR regulation. Together, these findings establish the nucleus as key stress-sensing signaling hub.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins↗

PubMed2010

CCDC6 represses CREB1 activity by recruiting histone deacetylase 1 and protein phosphatase 1.

RET/papillary thyroid carcinoma 1 (PTC1) oncogene is frequently activated in human PTCs. It is characterized by the fusion of the intracellular kinase-encoding domain of RET to the first 101 amino acids of CCDC6. The aim of our work is to characterize the function of the CCDC6 protein to better understand the function of its truncation, that results in the loss of the expression of one allele, in the process of thyroid carcinogenesis. Here, we report that CCDC6 interacts with CREB1 and represses its transcriptional activity by recruiting histone deacetylase 1 and protein phosphatase 1 proteins at the CRE site of the CREB1 target genes. Finally, we show an increased CREB1 phosphorylation and activity in PTCs carrying the RET/PTC1 oncogene. Consistently, an increased expression of two known CREB1 target genes, AREG and cyclin A, was observed in this subgroup of thyroid papillary carcinomas. Therefore, the repression of CREB1 activity by CCDC6 has a critical function in the development of human thyroid papillary carcinomas carrying RET/PTC1 activation.

Amphiregulin↗

PubMed2026

SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 1 regulates histone modification and DNA damage response during zygotic genome activation in pigs.

SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 1 (SETDB1) is a key epigenetic regulator that catalyzes histone H3 lysine 9 trimethylation (H3K9me3), a mark essential for transcriptional repression and heterochromatin formation. Here, we investigated the role of SETDB1 during zygotic genome activation (ZGA) in porcine embryos. SETDB1 knockdown (KD) was induced by microinjecting double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), and its impact on early embryonic development was evaluated. SETDB1 KD decreased H3K9me3 levels, markedly increased H3K9ac, and downregulated ZGA-associated genes. These epigenetic alterations were accompanied by impaired cleavage, reduced blastocyst formation, and a lower total cell number. Upon etoposide-induced DNA double-strand breaks, SETDB1 KD embryos showed reduced expression of key DNA repair proteins, failed to efficiently restore DNA integrity, and exhibited increased apoptosis, indicating a compromised DNA damage response and repair process. SETDB1 KD also reduced HDAC3 expression, suggesting that SETDB1 may regulate HDAC3 to maintain histone acetylation balance. Consistently, HDAC3 inhibition increased H3K9ac, decreased H3K9me3, and reduced SETDB1 protein levels, supporting a reciprocal regulatory relationship. Together, these findings indicate that SETDB1 is important for porcine embryonic development by coordinating histone modifications and safeguarding genomic integrity during ZGA, and they suggest that the interplay between SETDB1 and HDAC3 constitutes a potentially important epigenetic axis for proper histone modification dynamics and developmental competence.

Animals↗

PubMed2026

Genome assembly of Astatotilapia latifasciata uncovers B chromosome-linked chromatin reorganization.

B chromosomes (Bs) are supernumerary genomic elements found in many eukaryotes, yet their full sequence composition, functional potential, and regulatory impact on the host genome remain unclear. Here, we present a chromosome-level genome assembly of the cichlid fish Astatotilapia latifasciata, integrating PacBio long reads, Illumina short reads, and Hi-C chromatin contact maps to resolve both A and B chromosomes. The 0.93 Gb assembly (N50 = 36.2 Mb) includes a 34 Mb B chromosome containing 789 predicted protein-coding genes and a markedly higher density of transposable elements (TEs), especially long terminal repeats (LTR) retrotransposons. Transcriptome profiling revealed that B-linked genes are predominantly transcriptionally repressed relative to their A chromosome paralogs. Hi-C-based chromatin modeling uncovered distinct 3D structural configurations associated with the B chromosome, including fewer topologically associating domains (TADs), reduced loop formation, and altered compartmentalization. These changes are linked to long-range chromatin interactions and genomic rearrangements, suggesting that the B chromosome reshapes the nuclear architecture of the host genome. Our study proposes a potential regulatory role of Bs in genome and provides a genomic resource for investigating chromosome evolution in cichlids.

Animals↗

PubMed2024

Targeting the transcription factor YY1 is synthetic lethal with loss of the histone demethylase KDM5C.

An understanding of the enzymatic and scaffolding functions of epigenetic modifiers is important for the development of epigenetic therapies for cancer. The H3K4me2/3 histone demethylase KDM5C has been shown to regulate transcription. The diverse roles of KDM5C are likely determined by its interacting partners, which are still largely unknown. In this study, we screen for KDM5C-binding proteins and show that YY1 interacts with KDM5C. A synergistic antitumor effect is exerted when both KDM5C and YY1 are depleted, and targeting YY1 appears to be a vulnerability in KDM5C-deficient cancer cells. Mechanistically, KDM5C promotes global YY1 chromatin recruitment, especially at promoters. Moreover, an intact KDM5C JmjC domain but not KDM5C histone demethylase activity is required for KDM5C-mediated YY1 chromatin binding. Transcriptional profiling reveals that dual inhibition of KDM5C and YY1 increases transcriptional repression of cell cycle- and apoptosis-related genes. In summary, our work demonstrates a synthetic lethal interaction between YY1 and KDM5C and suggests combination therapies for cancer treatments.

YY1 Transcription Factor↗

PubMed2026

Cleavage region organizes the structural architecture of the SINE-derived B2 repressive ribozyme.

The SINE-encoded B2 retrotransposon is an RNA Polymerase III (POL-III)-derived transcript whose expression is substantially upregulated during various cellular stress responses. Beyond retrotransposition, the B2 non-coding RNA can directly bind and repress the activity of RNA Polymerase II (POL-II), leading to a significant downregulation of transcripts during stress. Notably, our recent findings have shown that B2 is a self-cleaving ribozyme whose activity can be induced by interactions with chromatin-modifying factors through non-canonical epigenetic mechanisms that co-regulate its function across distinct chromatin-binding target loci. Here, by integrating RNA chemical probing, small-angle X-ray scattering, and 3D motif modeling, we determine structural ensemble-to-function relations for the B2 SINE ribozyme RNA. Genetic perturbations of the RNA suggest that the B2 SINE ribozyme has a well-defined secondary and dynamic tertiary structure that depends on the integrity of the critical region, which confers ribozymatic activity and repressive extent by POL-II. Using an RNA engineering approach, we examine the effects of point mutations, deletions of the main cleavage site, and deletions of the cleavage domain on the structural ensemble of the RNA. Combining this approach with in vitro and in vivo functional perturbation methods highlights the relationships between structural ensembles and various biologically relevant functional outcomes.

RNA, Catalytic↗

PubMed2024

PRC1 and CTCF-Mediated Transition from Poised to Active Chromatin Loops Drives Bivalent Gene Activation.

Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) and CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) are critical regulators of 3D chromatin architecture that influence cellular transcriptional programs. Spatial chromatin structures comprise conserved compartments, topologically associating domains (TADs), and dynamic, cell-type-specific chromatin loops. Although the role of CTCF in chromatin organization is well-known, the involvement of PRC1 is less understood. In this study, we identified an unexpected, essential role for the canonical Pcgf2-containing PRC1 complex (cPRC1.2), a known transcriptional repressor, in activating bivalent genes during differentiation. Our Hi-C analysis revealed that cPRC1.2 forms chromatin loops at bivalent promoters, rendering them silent yet poised for activation. Using mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) with CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing, we found that the loss of Pcgf2, though not affecting the global level of H2AK119ub1, disrupts these cPRC1.2 loops in ESCs and impairs the transcriptional induction of crucial target genes necessary for neuronal differentiation. Furthermore, we identified CTCF enrichment at cPRC1.2 loop anchors and at Polycomb group (PcG) bodies, nuclear foci with concentrated PRC1 and its tethered chromatin domains, suggesting that PRC1 and CTCF cooperatively shape chromatin loop structures. Through virtual 4C and other genomic analyses, we discovered that establishing neuronal progenitor cell (NPC) identity involves a switch from cPRC1.2-mediated chromatin loops to CTCF-mediated active loops, enabling the expression of critical lineage-specific factors. This study uncovers a novel mechanism by which pre-formed PRC1 and CTCF loops at lineage-specific genes maintain a poised state for subsequent gene activation, advancing our understanding of the role of chromatin architecture in controlling cell fate transitions.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Natural leaf shape variation reveals diverse transcriptional targets of GmJAG1 during soybean leaf development.

The JAGGED transcription factor family regulates lateral organ development across angiosperms. In soybean (Glycine max Merr.), a D9H mutation in the EAR repression motif of GmJAG1 causes a narrow-leaflet phenotype and explains over 70% of phenotypic variance in leaf shape. Because this mutation does not affect the zinc finger DNA-binding domain, both alleles bind identical targets but differ in repressor recruitment. Previous studies mapped GmJAG1 binding sites, but the functional targets controlling leaf morphology are uncharacterized. Here, we used comparative transcriptomics across four soybean genotypes with contrasting leaf shape, spanning a developmental time series from shoot apex to mature leaf, and identified 1567 putative candidate target genes. GmJAG1 expression was confined to the shoot apex, yet 99.1% of candidate targets maintained differential expression throughout development. We found that neither Kip-Related Protein (KRP) cell cycle inhibitors nor Cyclin-Dependent Kinases (CDKs) showed differential expression despite binding evidence in Arabidopsis. However, D-type cyclins were upregulated in narrow-leaf genotypes suggesting that soybean GmJAG1 acts through cyclin-mediated rather than KRP-mediated cell cycle regulation described in Arabidopsis- a divergence in regulatory logic between the two species. Pathway analysis revealed enrichment of auxin (1.8-fold, P = 0.02) and salicylic acid (fourfold, P = 0.016) genes among JAG1D9H targets. Filtering by differential expression, binding data, phenotype correlation, and co-expression network membership identified 79 high-confidence targets, including orthologs of NPH3 (phototropin-mediated leaf flattening), MIK2 (cell wall integrity sensing), RD22 (ABA-responsive stress signaling), and SCL23 (GRAS transcription factor in bundle sheath development). These candidates provide targets for functional validation and breeding in legumes.

Glycine max↗

PubMed2026

Epigenetic regulation of transgenes.

Gene therapy holds significant potential for treating genetic disorders, but the use of viral vectors is limited by factors such as immunogenicity, payload capacity, and high manufacturing costs. Nonviral gene delivery (NVGD) using plasmid DNA presents an attractive alternative; however, it typically provides a limited magnitude or duration of transgene expression. One potential reason for these shortcomings is the host cell's epigenetic regulation mechanisms, which can silence both viral and nonviral transgenes. Specifically, when foreign DNA enters the nucleus, it is detected by nuclear DNA sensors, such as IFI16, which initiate the assembly of a "restrictosome" or nuclear domain 10 (ND10) body. This multiprotein complex contains several components, such as PML, Speckled Proteins (e.g., SP100), DAXX, and ATRX that act as a scaffold for recruiting various epigenetic modifiers that subsequently deposit repressive histone modifications like H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 on the transgene chromatin. These marks induce DNA methylation and the subsequent condensation of plasmids or episomes into heterochromatin, which represses transgene expression. Alternatively, unmethylated CpG motifs in bacterial plasmid DNA can trigger innate immune responses in the cytosol, but this review will specifically focus on the detailed mechanisms of epigenetic regulation responsible for silencing plasmid DNA within the host cell nucleus. Addressing these nuclear defense mechanisms, potentially through strategies that manipulate DNA methylation or inhibit restrictosome activity, is crucial for advancing the development of safe, effective, and long-lasting plasmid viral and non-viral gene therapies.

Epigenesis, Genetic↗

PubMed2025

Proteins driving liquid-liquid phase separation and histone modifications cooperatively associate with chromatin looping and transcriptional regulation.

BACKGROUND: Although liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) proteins are known to participate in genome organization and transcriptional regulation through the formation of biomolecular condensates, their functional interplay with other regulatory proteins and histone modifications in chromatin loop formation remains poorly characterized. By combining Hi-C chromatin interaction data with ChIP-seq profiles of 12, 27, and 24 LLPS proteins in GM12878, K562, and HepG2 cell lines, respectively, we identified chromatin loops associated with LLPS proteins and systematically analysed patterns of cooperative protein binding and histone modification enrichment within these loop-associated peaks. RESULTS: We identified 162, 313, and 431 chromatin loops associated with LLPS proteins in GM12878, K562, and HepG2 cell lines, respectively. These loops were relatively small in size and predominantly anchored at enhancer regions. Examination of cooperative binding of proteins within loop-associated peaks revealed that transcriptional repressor IKZF1, HDAC1, and SAP130 most frequently co-localized with LLPS proteins in GM12878, K562, and HepG2 cells, respectively. Further analysis of histone modification enrichment patterns revealed that active histone modifications, such as H3K4me2, H3K4me3, H3K9ac, and H3K27ac, co-localized at loop-associated peaks, with H3K4me1 exhibiting additional specific co-localization with these four histone modifications at enhancer-localized loop-associated peaks. Notably, bivalent chromatin domains where H3K27me3 co-localized with active histone modifications were identified at promoter-localized loop-associated peaks in HepG2 cells, and elevated H3K27me3 occupancy at these peaks was associated with transcriptional repression of target genes. Moreover, quantitative RNA-seq analysis revealed that the expression of target genes associated with enhancer-promoter loops was correlated with both the binding of LLPS proteins and the enrichment patterns of histone modifications within their ChIP-seq peaks at loop anchors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that LLPS proteins may cooperate with transcriptional repressors to facilitate chromatin looping. Furthermore, local enrichment of histone modifications at loop-associated peaks provides additional regulatory control over chromatin architecture and gene transcription.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Analysis of a BCOR internal tandem duplication in mouse embryonic stem cell to neuronal precursor differentiation.

BCOR (BCL-6 corepressor) is a component of variant Polycomb Repressive Complex 1.1 (vPRC1.1), one of several vPRC1 complexes that catalyze histone H2A ubiquitination thought to play an important role in PRC2 binding and the deposition of H3K27me3 to silence genes. The PCGF Ub-like fold discriminator (PUFD) domain at the C-terminus of BCOR forms a heterodimer with PCGF1, serving as a critical interface for its polycomb-dependent functions. Internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations in BCOR, causing in-frame duplications of 20 to 40 amino acids in the PUFD domain, are observed in heterogeneous tumors including sarcomas (kidney, bone, and endometrium) and neuroepithelial tumors in the brain. To dissect the molecular mechanisms underlying aberrant function of BCOR-ITD mutants, we employed mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells expressing either transgenic or endogenous BCOR-ITD. Our results indicate that the BCOR-ITD mutation does not disrupt the BCOR-PCGF1 interaction, instead maintaining the integrity of the vPRC1.1 complex. While displaying subtle changes in imprinted gene expression during differentiation toward a neural lineage, BCOR-ITD mutants also had no growth phenotype in culture. Furthermore, we found that CD24+ cells were enriched, as expected, during neural progenitor differentiation in both wildtype and mutant cells. However, sensitization of BCOR-ITD mES cells with EZH2 inhibitor during differentiation resulted in an unexpected enrichment of a CD24+CD26+ subpopulation, indicating aberrant cell fate that was also prevalent in a BCOR truncation mutant. Together, our results suggest that BCOR-ITD may largely retain wildtype function, but with increased susceptibility to synergistic stress on the Polycomb pathway.

Animals↗

PubMed2026

Identification of compounds that repress DUX4 expression in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is caused by epigenetic dysregulation of the disease locus, leading to pathogenic misexpression of DUX4 in skeletal muscle. Thus, most FSHD therapeutic approaches target DUX4. Our previous study identified the chromatin remodeling factor BAZ1A (bromodomain adjacent to zinc finger domain protein 1A) as a promising target for therapeutic development. Here we used an artificial intelligence-based screening pipeline to identify molecules predicted to bind the BAZ1A bromodomain, and validated hit compounds using FSHD-specific assays in FSHD myocytes. One compound, termed C06, emerged as a potent repressor of DUX4 and DUX4 target gene expression. Interestingly, while C06 exhibited binding to BAZ1A in vitro, it can also inhibit multiple kinases, including p38α, an upstream activator of DUX4. Despite this, at low doses C06 was an equally effective and more specific repressor of DUX4 than losmapimod, which is a robust and specific p38 inhibitor. At low concentrations, C06 returns the DUX4 gene expression signature to a healthier profile without major effects on the muscle transcriptome. Thus, C06 is a useful tool for potent and specific DUX4 suppression, and a viable candidate for further development. Our results highlight both the utility and limitations of AI for targeted drug discovery, and the importance of using an FSHD-specific functional screening strategy for selecting relevant candidates.

Muscular Dystrophy, Facioscapulohumeral↗

PubMed1977

Proteolysis of the bifunctional methionine-repressible aspartokinase II-homoserine dehydrogenase II of Escherichia coli K12. Production of an active homoserine dehydrogenase fragment.

The dimeric bifunctional enzyme aspartokinase II-homoserine dehydrogenase II (Mr = 2 X 88,000) of Escherichia coli K12 can be cleaved into two nonoverlapping fragments by limited proteolysis with subtilisin. These two fragments can be separated under nondenaturing conditions as dimeric species, which indicates that each fragment has retained some of the association areas involved in the conformation of the native protein. The smaller fragment (Mr = 2 X 24,000) is devoid of aspartokinase and homoserine dehydrogenase activity. The larger fragment (Mr = 2 X 37,000) is endowed with full homoserine dehydrogenase activity. These results show that the polypeptide chains of the native enzyme are organized in two different domains, that both domains participate in building up the native dimeric structure, and that one of these domains only is responsible for homoserine dehydrogenase activity. A model of aspartokinase II-homoserine dehydrogenase II is proposed, which accounts for the present results.

Alcohol Oxidoreductases↗