Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in substance use disorders is safe and tolerable: A Systematic review of 141 clinical trials including 4299 participants.

BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation intervention investigated as a treatment for substance use disorder (SUD) and its co-occurring disorders. As the number of rTMS SUD clinical trials increase, the safety and tolerability profile should be assessed. In this systematic review, we investigate adverse events (AEs) of rTMS in individuals with SUD and factors that may influence their occurrence. METHODS: We performed a systematic PubMed search to identify all controlled trials of rTMS in SUD published up to January 2025. Eligible studies were assessed, and safety information was extracted for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 141 clinical trials with 4299 participants were included in their active arms. rTMS trials recruited participants who were engaged in active substance use, were in the pre-treatment phase, in early recovery, or in sustained recovery. Twenty-two studies explicitly reported no AEs. Sixty-nine studies reported only mild AEs, while only six studies reported moderate AEs. Thirty-five studies did not report safety-outcomes/AEs. As expected, participants reported mild and temporary AEs such as headaches, pain or discomfort under the coil, or dizziness. Only nine studies reported serious AEs (7 studies in active TMS and 2 in sham TMS). Importantly, no seizures attributable to active rTMS were reported in these SUD samples. CONCLUSION: Overall, rTMS in SUD samples is safe and well-tolerated regardless of recovery stage and substance. Most reported side effects were mild, self-limiting, and tolerable. However, AE reporting was incomplete, as 35 of 141 trials reported no safety data, limiting conclusions to reported outcomes. This evidence supports the safety of rTMS as a potential stand-alone or adjunctive treatment for SUD.

Humans

MRI-Negative Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: Comparison of Hypertensive Encephalopathy With and Without Vasogenic Edema.

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) can present with negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by comparing clinical features between cases of PRES with vasogenic edema and cases of hypertensive encephalopathy without MRI changes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with hypertensive encephalopathy from August 1, 2008, to December 31, 2017, were identified retrospectively and matched by age (±5 years) and sex in a 1:2 ratio to patients retrospectively identified as having PRES from January 1, 2002, to November 30, 2017. A review of MRI images and clinical information was performed. RESULTS: We identified 16 cases of hypertensive encephalopathy and 32 age- and sex-matched controls with PRES showing vasogenic edema on MRI. There were no statistically significant differences in the odds of presentation with headache (odds ratio [OR], 1.372; 95% CI, 0.458 to 4.106), encephalopathy (OR, 2.303; 95% CI, 0.433 to 12.236), visual disturbance (OR, 0.826; 95% CI, 0.185 to 3.697), or focal neurologic deficit (OR, 4.000; 95% CI, 0.767 to 20.872). Seizures were more common in patients with vasogenic edema (OR, 0.082; 95% CI, 0.010 to 0.664). There were no significant differences in odds of acute kidney injury (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 0.679 to 12.449) or odds of having a history of malignancy (OR, 0.295; 95% CI, 0.076 to 1.152), transplantation (OR, 3.347; 95% CI, 0.594 to 18.880), or autoimmune disease (OR, 0.400; 95% CI, 0.104 to 1.532). Systolic blood pressure at presentation was higher in patients with hypertensive encephalopathy and negative MRI as compared with patients with PRES and vasogenic edema (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.05). CONCLUSION: Most presenting symptoms and risk factors were not significantly different between cases of hypertensive encephalopathy with and without vasogenic edema, arguing that the diagnosis of PRES in the setting of acute severe hypertension may not depend on MRI confirmation.

Humans