SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Propafenone”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1991

Enantiomer/enantiomer interaction of (S)- and (R)-propafenone for cytochrome P450IID6-catalyzed 5-hydroxylation: in vitro evaluation of the mechanism.

Many drugs are used as racemates, and the enantiomers may differ in terms of pharmacological properties and disposition. Stereoselective disposition of the enantiomers can arise from metabolism of the enantiomers via different routes catalyzed by different enzymes. In contrast, the enantiomers may be metabolized by the same enzyme at different rates. In the latter case, the enantiomers can compete for this metabolic step, giving rise to the possibility of an enantiomer/enantiomer interaction. We have chosen the antiarrhythmic propafenone, for which in vivo data indicated an interaction between (S)- and (R)-propafenone, as a model substance to study the mechanism underlying that interaction in human liver microsomes. We used the cytochrome P450IID6-mediated 5-hydroxylation of propafenone as a model pathway, because this metabolic step constitutes the major route of biotransformation of propafenone. The Michaelis-Menten kinetics for 5-hydroxylation were determined after incubation of (R)- and (S)-propafenone and a pseudoracemate consisting of (S)-[2H4]propafenone and (R)-propafenone. Inhibition experiments were performed using (S)-[2H4]propafenone as an inhibitor of the 5-hydroxylation of (R)-propafenone, and vice versa. The kinetic model of mixed alternative substrates was used to simulate inhibition experiments. Experimental data were compared with those predicted by this model. We observed a substantial stereoselectivity after incubation of the individual enantiomers [(S)-propafenone: Vmax, 10.2 pmol/micrograms/hr, and Km, 5.3 microM; (R)-propafenone: Vmax, 5.5 pmol/micrograms/hr, and Km, 3.0 microM]. In contrast, no substrate stereoselectivity was observed after incubation of the pseudoracemate [3.1 pmol/micrograms/hr for (S)-[2H4]propafenone and 3.3 pmol/micrograms/hr for (R)-propafenone]. Application of the model revealed Ki values of 2.9 and 5.2 microM for the inhibition of 5-hydroxylation of (S)-[2H4]-propafenone by (R)-propafenone and for inhibition of 5-hydroxylation of (R)-propafenone by (S)-[2H4]-propafenone, respectively. The predicted and the experimental data were in good agreement, and both indicated the mode of inhibition to be competitive. In conclusion, the enantiomers of propafenone interact with respect to 5-hydroxylation, with (R)-propafenone being a more potent inhibitor than the S-enantiomer with respect to cytochrome P450IID6-mediated 5-hydroxylation. Because beta-blocking properties of propafenone reside in the S-enantiomer, inhibition of metabolism of this enantiomer by (R)-propafenone may have therapeutic consequences.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1993

Propafenone. A reappraisal of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic use in cardiac arrhythmias.

Propafenone is an orally active sodium channel blocking agent with beta-adrenoceptor antagonist and weak calcium antagonist activity. The pharmacokinetic profile of propafenone is complex, characterised as typically nonlinear, saturable, stereoselective and dependent on both dose and debrisoquin metaboliser phenotype; individualised dosage titration is required. Both placebo- and drug-controlled studies have confirmed the efficacy of propafenone in the treatment of premature ventricular complexes, ventricular couplets and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; in a large meta-analysis, propafenone together with amiodarone, flecainide and encainide were significantly more effective in the control of ventricular ectopy than other antiarrhythmic agents. However, the use of propafenone in these indications, like that of other antiarrhythmic agents, is likely to be limited to patients with a favourable risk-to-benefit ratio. Propafenone has also demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of malignant ventricular arrhythmias (ventricular fibrillation and sustained ventricular tachycardia); preliminary mortality data obtained with propafenone have been encouraging in this patient group. In addition, propafenone has a favourable noncardiac tolerability profile and beta-adrenoceptor antagonist activity, which may offer advantages in some specific patient groups. The area of research concerning propafenone which has shown the greatest expansion over the past 5 years is in the treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias. Propafenone has marked efficacy in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and has been recommended as a first-line prophylactic agent in those with rapid anterograde conduction. Propafenone is also effective in the conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm, although comparative studies are required to determine advantages over more established agents. Propafenone use has been successfully extended to children with limited data demonstrating consistent efficacy in the control of junctional ectopic tachycardia. As with all antiarrhythmic agents, propafenone has the potential to induce arrhythmias. Comparative studies are required to assess in more detail the cardiac tolerability profile of propafenone against other class Ic agents. In conclusion, propafenone offers a broad spectrum of activity in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, although its use in patients with potentially malignant arrhythmias will remain limited for the present. Due to its unique pharmacodynamic profile, propafenone deserves consideration as an individual agent.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Consequences of rifampicin treatment on propafenone disposition in extensive and poor metabolizers of CYP2D6.

Propafenone undergoes extensive metabolism both by phase I and phase II enzymes: cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) dependent polymorphic hydroxylation to its main metabolite 5-OH-propafenone, CYP3A4/1A2 dependent N-dealkylation and further glucuronidation and sulfation. Since CYP2D6 is not inducible by rifampicin, an important drug interaction between rifampicin and propafenone is not to be expected a priori. However, non-CYP2D6-dependent pathways may be induced as a case report described dramatically lowered plasma concentrations of propafenone with loss of dysrhythmia control associated with rifampicin treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate induction properties of rifampicin on propafenone disposition in extensive metabolizers and poor metabolizers of CYP2D6. Six extensive metabolizers and six poor metabolizers ingested 600 mg rifampicin once daily for nine consecutive days. The day before the first rifampicin dose and on the day of the last rifampicin dose each individual received a single intravenous (i.v.) infusion of 140 mg unlabelled propafenone and 2 h later a single dose of 300 mg deuterated propafenone orally (p.o.). During enzyme induction maximum QRS prolongation decreased significantly after propafenone p.o. (21 +/- 7% versus 13 +/- 6% in extensive metabolizers, P < 0.01; 15 +/- 6% versus 9 +/- 6% in poor metabolizers, P < 0.01) and not after propafenone i.v. In parallel, there were no substantial differences in pharmacokinetics of propafenone i.v. by rifampicin. However, bioavailability of propafenone dropped from 30 +/- 15% to 10 +/- 8% in extensive metabolizers (P < 0.01) and from 81 +/- 6% to 48 +/- 8% in poor metabolizers (P < 0.001). Following propafenone p.o. clearances through N-dealkylation (4.1 +/- 2.1 ml/min versus 23.5 +/- 12.6 ml/min in extensive metabolizers, P < 0.01; 3.4 +/- 1.3 ml/min versus 16.0 +/- 5.5 ml/min in poor metabolizers, P < 0.001) and glucuronidation (123 +/- 48 ml/min versus 457 +/- 267 ml/min in extensive metabolizers, P < 0.05; 43 +/- 9 ml/min versus 112 +/- 34 ml/min in poor metabolizers, P < 0.01), but not 5-hydroxylation increased regardless of phenotype indicating substantial enzyme induction. Clearances to propafenone sulfate and conjugates of 5-OH-propafenone were significantly enhanced by rifampicin treatment in poor metabolizers (P < 0.01). Thus, induction of both phase I pathways (CYP3A4/1A2) and phase II pathways (glucuronidation, sulfation) of propafenone by rifampicin resulted in a clinically relevant metabolic drug interaction which was more pronounced in extensive metabolizers than in poor metabolizers with regard to percentage decrease in bioavailability of propafenone.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1994

An enantiomer-enantiomer interaction of (S)- and (R)-propafenone modifies the effect of racemic drug therapy.

BACKGROUND: Therapy with racemic compounds produces effects that can be attributed to both (S)- and (R)-enantiomers. Here we have tested the hypothesis that an enantiomer-enantiomer interaction would modulate the effects of treatment with a racemate, the antiarrhythmic propafenone. Previous studies have shown that while the enantiomers of propafenone exert similar sodium channel-blocking (QRS widening) effects, it is the (S)-enantiomer that produces beta-blockade; moreover, we have demonstrated recently that (R)-propafenone inhibits the metabolism of (S)-propafenone in vitro. METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-blind, randomized study compared the effects of (R/S)-, (S)-, (R)-propafenone (150 mg q 6 hours for 4 days) and placebo on QRS duration (delta QRS) and on maximum exercise heart rate (delta HRmax), an index of beta-blockade. The clearance of (S)-propafenone was significantly lower (-55 +/- 24%, P < .001) during treatment with (R/S)-propafenone than with the (S)-enantiomer alone, and delta HRmax was significantly altered during (R/S)-propafenone (-8.8 +/- 6.6 beats per minute; P < .01) and during (S)-propafenone (-4.3 +/- 4.8 beats per minute; P < .01) but not during (R)-propafenone (-1.8 +/- 6.4 beats per minute) or placebo (0.3 +/- 7.1 beats per minute). In contrast, (R/S)-, (S)-, and (R)-propafenone all prolonged QRS compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that (R)-propafenone impairs the disposition of (S)-propafenone in humans. As a result, the beta-blocking effects of 150 mg of racemic propafenone (75 mg of the [S]-enantiomer) were more pronounced than those of 150 mg of (S)-propafenone alone. Thus, the effects of racemic drug therapy are not necessarily those predicted by summation of the effects of the individual enantiomers.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed1988

Electrophysiologic, inotropic and antiarrhythmic effects of propafenone, 5-hydroxypropafenone and N-depropylpropafenone.

We compared the electrophysiologic, inotropic and antiarrhythmic properties of propafenone and two metabolites, 5-hydroxy (5-OH) propafenone and N-depropyl (N-DP) propafenone. In 18 canine Purkinje fibers with normal maximum diastolic potentials, all drugs (1 x 10(-8) to 1 x 10(-5) M) reduced action potential amplitude and duration. However, propafenone and 5-OH propafenone reduced Vmax in a use-dependent fashion at a lower concentration than N-DP propafenone. In 16 Purkinje fibers, slow response action potentials were induced by 22 mM K+ and isoproterenol, 1 x 10(-6) M. Vmax was comparably reduced by all compounds at 1 x 10(-5) M, but action potential amplitude was not affected by 5-OH propafenone. In 16 other Purkinje fibers in which automaticity at low levels of membrane potential was induced by BaCl2 (0.25 mM), only 5-OH propafenone was effective in slowing the automatic rate at therapeutic concentrations (3 micrograms/ml). In 15 guinea pig papillary muscles, all three drugs had negative inotropic effects at concentrations greater than or equal to 1 x 10(-6) M. In conscious dogs with sustained ventricular tachycardia 24 hr after infarction, we injected propafenone or a metabolite through an atrial cannula. At similar plasma levels, neither propafenone (n = 6) nor N-DP propafenone (n = 6) suppressed the arrhythmia, whereas 5-OH propafenone eliminated ventricular tachycardia in four of six dogs, and was more effective against monomorphic than polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Hence, the two major metabolites of propafenone have important electrophysiologic effects, and 5-OH propafenone is more potent than the parent compound as a antiarrhythmic drug in the 24-hr Harris dog.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed1997

The digoxin-propafenone interaction: characterization of a mechanism using renal tubular cell monolayers.

When propafenone is given with digoxin, digoxin serum concentrations increase. Although the digoxin-propafenone interaction is well known clinically, the mechanism by which propafenone interferes with digoxin elimination is unclear. To test the hypothesis that propafenone or one or both of its two major metabolites, 5-hydroxypropafenone (5-OHP) and N-depropylpropafenone (NDPP), inhibit the P-glycoprotein-mediated net renal tubular secretion of digoxin, we examined the transport of digoxin and the well-studied P-glycoprotein substrate vinblastine across confluent Madin-Darby canine kidney cell monolayers in the absence and presence of propafenone, 5-OHP and NDPP. Propafenone and its two major metabolites significantly inhibit the secretory flux of digoxin and vinblastine (propafenone > 5-OHP >> NDPP). Despite decreases in net transport, cellular digoxin accumulation did not decrease, suggesting that neither propafenone nor its metabolites prohibited digoxin from entering the cells at the basolateral side. NDPP, but not 5-OHP, was detected after 48 hr of incubation of the cells with propafenone alone. When the cells were incubated with propafenone or 5-OHP, apical accumulation of 5-OHP, but neither propafenone nor NDPP, against a concentration gradient was observed. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the digoxin-propafenone interaction results from the inhibition of the renal tubular transport of digoxin by propafenone and its metabolites. Our data suggest that propafenone is an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein, whereas 5-OHP is a possible substrate.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

PubMed1999

Effects of propafenone on K currents in human atrial myocytes.

1. The class Ic anti-arrhythmic agent, flecainide is known to inhibit the transient outward K current (Ito) selectively in human atrium. We studied the effects of propafenone, another class Ic antiarrhythmic agent, on K currents in human atrial myocytes using a whole-cell voltage-clamp method. 2. Propafenone inhibited both Ito and the sustained or ultra-rapid delayed rectifier K current (Isus or Ikur) evoked by depolarization pulses. The concentration for half-maximal inhibition (IC50) was 4.9 microM for Ito and 8.6 microM for Isus. Propafenone blocked Ito and Isus in a voltage- and use-independent fashion and accelerated the inactivation time constant of Ito [from 28.3 to 6.7 ms at 10 microM propafenone]. 3. The steady-state inactivation curve for Ito was unaffected by propafenone. Propafenone did not affect the initial current at depolarizing potentials, but it did produce a block that increased as a function of time after depolarization (time constant of 3.4 ms). This suggests that propafenone preferentially blocked Ito in the open state. 4. Propafenone had no significant effect on the rate at which Ito recovered from inactivation at -80 mV suggesting that propafenone dissociates rapidly from the channel. 5. The steady-state activation curve for Isus was not affected by propafenone. Propafenone slowed the time course of the onset of the Isus tail current. This suggests that propafenone blocked Isus in the open state. 6. The present results suggest that, unlike flecainide, propafenone blocks both Ito and Isus in human atrial myocytes in the open state at clinically relevant concentrations.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗

PubMed1995

[Propafenone and flecainide in the therapy of ventricular arrhythmias].

Flecainide and propafenone are antiarrhythmic drugs of the class 1C (Vaughan and Williams) commonly used for ventricular arrhythmias. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of these drugs in 170 consecutive patients with ventricular arrhythmias who referred to our cardiological ambulatory. The study population was divided into two groups according to the absence (group A,82 patients) or presence of organic heart disease (group 1B: 51 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >35%; group 2B: 37 patients with LVEF<35%). Ventricular arrhythmias were evaluated with a 48 hours Holter monitoring at baseline, and with a control 24 hours Holter monitoring at 15 days (for optimizing the dosage), at 5 months and at 10 months from the beginning of antiarrhythmic therapy. Patients of group A were randomly assigned to antiarrhythmic treatment (flecainide 150-300 mg/die or propafenone 450-900 mg/die). For patients of group B, such choice was leaded by the clinical and strumental data (32 patients were treated with flecainide, 56 patients with propafenone). In the 160 patients who ended the 10 months follow-up, we observed the following results: patients of group A showed a mean percentage reduction in incidence of premature ventricular complexes (PVC) after therapy in comparison to basal conditions of 93% and 89% with flecainide and propafenone, respectively, after a treatment of 5 months (p < 0.001); after 10 months mean percentage reduction of PVC was 91% with each drug (p = n.s.); complex ventricular events (CVE) were reduced of 90% and of 100% after 5 and 10 months, respectively, of treatment with flecainide and of 100% both after 5 and 10 months of treatment with propafenone (p = n.s.) -- patients of group 1B showed a mean percentage reduction of PVC of 87% and 84% after 5 and 10 months, respectiively, of treatment with propafenone (p = n.s.); after 5 months of therapy mean percentage CVE reduction was 66% with flecainide and 86% with propafenone (p < 0.001); after 10 months this mean reduction was 53% with flecainide and 73% with propafenone (p < 0.001). -- patients of group 2B showed a mean reduction of PVC of 59% and 58% after 5 and 10 months of therapy with flecainide, and of 65% and 67% after 5 and 10 months of therapy with propafenone (p = n.s.); CVE were reduced of 28% with flecainide and of 47% with propafenone after 5 months of treatment (p < 0.001) and of 36% with flecainide against 52% with propafenone after 10 months (p < 0.01). In the present study there was no significant difference between the two drugs in terms of tollerance and collateral effects (8% with flecainide vs 7%, with propafenone). Our results confirm the efficacy of the 1C class drugs in the treatment of "essential" ventricular arrhytmias. This efficacy appears reduced in non selected patients with organic heart disease. In these latter patients propafenone has shown more efficacy than flecainide in reducing CVE.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Efficacy and safety of propafenone sustained release in the prophylaxis of symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (The European Rythmol/Rytmonorm Atrial Fibrillation Trial [ERAFT] Study).

We report a double-blind, multicenter, multinational, placebo-controlled, and well-controlled trial to prove that the sustained-release (SR) formulation of propafenone is superior to placebo in preventing symptoms of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). A total of 594 patients were enrolled in the qualifying period of the study and 293 patients were randomized at 53 centers. There were significant increases in the arrhythmia-free periods from day 5 of randomization to the first recurrence of symptomatic atrial arrhythmia in the propafenone SR 325 mg twice daily (p = 0.004) and propafenone SR 425 mg twice daily (p = 0.003) treatment groups compared with placebo. The median arrhythmia-free time was 9 days in the placebo group, 35 days in the propafenone SR 325 mg twice daily group, and 44 days in the propafenone SR 425 mg twice daily group. There was a significant reduction in average heart rate during the first recurrence of symptomatic arrhythmia after day 5 in the low-dose propafenone group compared with placebo. The median treatment failure time from day 5 (arrhythmia recurrence, adverse events, and withdrawals) was prolonged from 8 days in the placebo group to 19 days in the propafenone SR 325 mg twice daily group (p = 0.002) and to 24 days in the propafenone SR 425 mg twice daily group (p = 0.006). The percentage of patients with >/=1 serious adverse event was similar in the propafenone SR treatment groups (propafenone SR 325 mg twice daily, 10.0%; propafenone SR 425 mg twice daily, 11.2%) but lower in the placebo group (1.1%). In conclusion, the SR formulation of propafenone is superior to placebo, well-tolerated, and prevents symptoms of paroxysmal AF.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1997

Inhibition of L-type calcium current by propafenone in single myocytes isolated from the rabbit atrioventricular node.

1. The atrioventricular node (AVN) is an important part of the conduction system in the heart and is a significant site of antiarrhythmic drug action. The class 1 antiarrhythmic propafenone is effective in treating a variety of arrhythmias, including those involving the AVN. In this study, we have investigated the effects of propafenone on ionic currents in single rabbit AVN cells, focusing in particular on those on L-type calcium current (ICa,L). 2. With a standard K-based internal dialysis solution, exposure to 5 microM propafenone reduced significantly the amplitude of ICa,L. In spontaneously active AVN myocytes, action potential upstroke velocity was decreased by propafenone exposure, consistent with the observed change in ICa,L. 3. By use of a Cs-based internal dialysis solution to record ICa,L selectively, voltage clamp test pulses were applied from a holding potential of -40 mV to +10 mV (stimulation frequency 0.33 Hz). Propafenone 5 microM reduced mean ICa,L density at +10 mV from -9.58 +/- 1.05 pA/pF to -4.19 +/- 0.60 pA/pF (P < 0.002). A range of propafenone concentrations were applied which reduced ICa,L in a dose-dependent manner (IC50 1.7 microM). When test pulses were applied to a range of potentials, propafenone reduced ICa,L at each potential without significantly affecting the activation curve for this current. Thus, propafenone reduced ICa,L conductance, without affecting the voltage-dependent activation properties of the current. 4. ICa,L block by propafenone exhibited tonic-, use- and frequency-dependent characteristics. 5. In the presence of propafenone, the voltage-dependence of inactivation of ICa,L was shifted 8 mV in the hyperpolarizing direction. Also, the recovery of ICa,L from inactivation was slowed by propafenone. 6. The ICa,L blocking properties of propafenone may mediate some of the antiarrhythmic properties of this agent, particularly in regions of the heart such as the AVN in which ICa,L contributes significantly to the action potential upstroke.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed1998

Stereoselective steady state disposition and action of propafenone in Chinese subjects.

AIMS: To investigate the steady state disposition and action of racemic propafenone and its enantiomers and the potential for an enantiomer-enantiomer interaction in Chinese subjects. METHODS: Eight healthy male Chinese individuals received in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study racemic propafenone (150 mg every 6 h), (S)-, and (R)-propafenone (150 mg each every 6 h) and placebo orally for 4 days. During the last dosing interval the plasma concentrations of both enantiomers of propafenone were measured and ECG, blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate were monitored. RESULTS: Whereas the apparent elimination half-life (t1/2,z), mean residence time (MRT) and time to reach peak concentrations (tmax) of (S)- and (R)-propafenone were similar and independent of the administered agent, significant differences were observed in the apparent oral clearance (CLO) of the enantiomers. During dosing with racemic propafenone CLO of (S)- and (R)-propafenone averaged (+/-s.d.) 1226+751 and 1678+625 ml min(-1), respectively (P=0.024). Following the administration of the pure enantiomers CLO of (S)-propafenone increased (P= 0.007) to 2028+/-959 ml min(-1) and that of (R)-propafenone was reduced (P= 0.042) to 1318+/-867 ml min(-1). Both enantiomers and the racemate caused about a 10% increase in the QRS duration (P<0.05) and PR-interval (P<0.01) when compared with placebo. The increase in maximum exercise heart rate was significantly (P<0.05) attenuated only at 3 h following the administration of the racemate and the S-enantiomer. MAP and QTC were not affected significantly. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the stereoselective disposition of propafenone is similar in Chinese and Caucasian subjects (previously published findings), the (R)-enantiomer being cleared more rapidly. A similar enantiomer-enantiomer interaction also occurred. Thus, when the racemate was given, the elimination of (S)-propafenone was impaired and that of the (R)-form accelerated compared with single enantiomer administration. The results indicate that dosage adjustments are probably not required in Chinese patients receiving propafenone.

Adult↗

PubMed1988

Effect of pH on the myocardial uptake and pharmacodynamics of propafenone in the isolated rabbit heart.

The influence of pH on the myocardial disposition of propafenone was studied in isolated perfused rabbit hearts. Five pH groups were evaluated: pH 7.0, 7.2, 7.4, 7.6, and 7.8. Hearts were perfused with a modified Krebs-Henseleit buffer containing approximately 100 ng/ml propafenone. Myocardial propafenone accumulation was determined from differences in the aortic perfusate and coronary sinus effluent propafenone concentrations. The myocardial accumulation of propafenone was significantly pH dependent. The steady-state propafenone concentration increased from 5.9 +/- 1.3 micrograms/g at pH 7.0 to 13.2 +/- 3.8 micrograms/g at pH 7.4 and 24.2 +/- 3.5 micrograms/g at pH 7.6. The time to reach steady-state myocardial propafenone levels increased proportionately with the increased propafenone levels. Steady-state was not reached by 150 min at pH of 7.6 or 7.8. Percent change in QRS duration was measured to monitor the electrophysiologic effect of propafenone. The relationship between the myocardial drug concentration and the measured changes in QRS also was evaluated. The myocardial concentration-effect relationships were linear over the observed myocardial concentration range. The slopes of these concentration-effect relationships were similar for three groups (pH 7.0, 7.2, and 7.4). Over the pH range 7.0-7.4, the steady-state effect increased as a function of pH and correlated with the differences in propafenone steady-state myocardial concentrations. However, at alkalotic pH, the concentration-effect relationship was shifted to the right; less effect was observed than might be predicted for the myocardial propafenone concentration. Thus, small changes in pH may significantly alter the myocardial distribution and pharmacodynamics of propafenone.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Comparison of the effects of liposomal amphotericin B and conventional amphotericin B on propafenone metabolism and hepatic cytochrome P-450 in rats.

The effects of conventional amphotericin B (AmB) dissolved in sodium deoxycholate on microsomal cytochrome P-450 concentrations and propafenone metabolism to 5-hydroxy-propafenone and N-desalkyl-propafenone were compared with those of liposomal AMB (Li-AMB) in rats. AmB (3 mg/kg/day, intravenously [i.v.]) given for 4 days caused a significant decrease in the concentration of hepatic microsomal cytochrome P-450 (0.43 +/- 0.06 nmol/mg versus 0.62 +/- 0. 05 nmol/mg for the control [P < 0.05]). Following the application of Li-AMB (15 mg/kg/day, i.v.), hepatic microsomal cytochrome P-450 concentrations were unchanged at 0.64 +/- 0.08 nmol/mg. AmB decreased ex vivo propafenone metabolism to 5-hydroxy-propafenone and N-desalkyl-propafenone significantly. Sodium deoxycholate (the vehicle of AmB) by itself induced a significant decline of 5-hydroxy-propafenone and N-desalkyl-propafenone production, while microsomal cytochrome P-450 concentrations remained unchanged. In contrast, Li-AMB did not change the levels of production of 5-hydroxy-propafenone or of N-desalkyl-propafenone at either substrate concentration tested (50 micromol and 200 micromol). Microsomal AmB concentrations were significantly higher following Li-AMB application (21.1 +/- 6.2 microg/g versus 3.7 +/- 1.4 microg/g for AmB [P < 0.05]). We conclude that Li-AMB, in contrast to AmB, decreases neither hepatic microsomal cytochrome P-450 nor hepatic propafenone metabolism in rats ex vivo. Sodium deoxycholate alone decreases propafenone metabolism in a similar way to AmB, suggesting that it participates in AmB-induced disturbance of hepatic metabolic function.

Amphotericin B↗

PubMed2000

Is there a synergic effect of propafenone associated with atrial overdrive pacing for atrial arrhythmia prevention? A randomised crossover study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of adding propafenone to atrial overdrive for the prevention of atrial arrhythmia episodes in patients with DDD pacemakers. DESIGN: 22 patients (8 female, 14 male, mean (SD) age 67 (9) years, range 48 to 77) with DDD pacemakers and frequent paroxysmal atrial arrhythmia episodes were evaluated in a randomised crossover study. SETTING: University hospital. METHODS: Atrial overdrive was defined as a paced rate of 10 paced beats/min above the mean ventricular rate stored for the last 24 hours in the pacemaker memory function. The protocol consisted of two phases of one month each. The first phase consisted of atrial overdrive alone, while in the second phase, propafenone (600 mg/day) was added to atrial overdrive (atrial overdrive + propafenone). All 22 patients underwent the two phases in random order. RESULTS: Mean ventricular rate was 72 (8) beats/min with atrial overdrive v 73 (6) with atrial overdrive + propafenone (NS). With atrial overdrive, 14 patients (64. 6%) had no recorded atrial arrhythmia v 15 (68.2%) with atrial overdrive + propafenone (NS). There was no statistical difference between the atrial overdrive and atrial overdrive + propafenone phases with regard to the number of atrial arrhythmia episodes (14 (27) v 13 (28)), their total duration (30 (78) v 29 (63) h), and their maximum duration (41 (72) v 31 (58) min). However, in the brady-tachy subgroup with persistent atrial arrhythmias, atrial overdrive + propafenone produced a shorter mean cumulative duration of atrial arrhythmia than atrial overdrive (104 (115) v 178 (149) h, p = 0.04), with a significant decrease in the number of atrial arrhythmia episodes (134 (98) v 102 (83), p = 0.05). The proportion of asymptomatic atrial arrhythmia episodes increased only in the AV block group during atrial overdrive + propafenone (p = 0.03). Three patients had atrial arrhythmias during atrial overdrive + propafenone but not with atrial overdrive alone. CONCLUSIONS: In DDD paced patients, the overall effect of propafenone during atrial overdrive is variable. Propafenone may increase the proportion of asymptomatic atrial arrhythmia episodes. A proarrhythmic effect of propafenone was documented (aggravation of atrial arrhythmias). These results need to be confirmed by further larger randomised studies.

Aged↗

PubMed1988

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of propafenone and cimetidine.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the extensively metabolized antiarrhythmic agent propafenone were assessed alone and during concomitant administration of cimetidine. Twelve healthy subjects were given successively the following treatments: propafenone 225 mg q8h plus cimetidine placebo; cimetidine 400 mg q8h plus propafenone placebo; and propafenone 225 mg plus cimetidine 400 mg q8h. After a minimum of 5 days on each regimen, plasma drug concentrations and electrocardiogram conduction intervals were measured during a drug washout period. The maximum concentration of propafenone in plasma was 993 +/- 532 ng/mL when propafenone was given alone compared with 1230 +/- 591 ng/mL when propafenone was given with cimetidine (P = .0622). Differences in tmax, t1/2, and Cp ss did not approach statistical significance when propafenone alone was compared with propafenone plus cimetidine. When compared with cimetidine, propafenone significantly increased the PR interval from 161 +/- 5 msec to 192 +/- 6 msec (P less than .01) and the QRS duration from 89 +/- 3 msec to 98 +/- 4 msec (P less than .01). Combination therapy caused a modest additional increase in QRS duration to 103 +/- 3 msec (P less than .01). In conclusion, cimetidine caused small changes in propafenone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics; but these changes are unlikely to be clinically important.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of flecainide versus propafenone in hospital out-patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation/flutter. The Flecainide AF French Study Group.

To assess the cardiac and extracardiac safety and efficacy of flecainide versus propafenone in patients suffering from episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter, 97 patients were enrolled in a randomized, open-label, long-term, parallel, comparative multicenter study. The diagnosis of paroxysmal AF or atrial flutter had to be fully documented prior to inclusion in the study. Of the 97 patients enrolled in the study, 48 patients (25 men, 23 women, mean age 62.4 +/- 12.3 years) received flecainide; 49 patients (26 men, 23 women, mean age 63.6 +/- 12.2 years) received propafenone. The initial dose of flecainide was 50 mg twice daily, and this could be increased in steps of 50 mg twice daily every 4 days to a maximum of 300 mg/day. The initial dose of propafenone was 300 mg twice daily and this could be increased in steps of 300 mg every 4 days to a maximum of 1200 mg/day. At each visit, medical events, vital sign measurements (blood pressure, pulse rate), concomitant medications, adverse experiences, and study drug dosage changes were evaluated. Routine clinical laboratory tests were evaluated at the month 6 visit, and a 24-hr Holter recording was obtained at the month 1 visit. Almost half (45) of the patients were discontinued from the study before completing 1 year of therapy. The probability of successful treatment versus time--i.e., the proportion of patients who remained on therapy over the course of 1 year therapy--was 0.619 for the flecainide group and 0.469 for the propafenone group (p = 0.079; difference not significant). The difference is largely attributed to the higher proportion of patients in the propafenone group (9) than in the flecainide group (2) who experienced side effects important enough to stop the treatment. (The incidence of side effects was not statistically different between treatment groups, although it was higher in the propafenone group.) The proportion of patients who discontinued treatment due to inadequate response was similar in the 2 groups: 11 patients (22.9%) in the flecainide group and 12 patients (24.4%) in the propafenone group withdrew from the study, primarily because of an inadequate response, i.e., they experienced an increase in duration, frequency, and severity of attacks of AF or atrial flutter. Neurologic signs, central and peripheral, were mostly encountered in the flecainide group (8.5%), and, gastrointestinal effects were more often reported in the propafenone group (16.7%). In paroxysmal AF and paroxysmal atrial flutter, flecainide and propafenone are equally effective. However, in this study the probability of a patient's staying on flecainide after 1 year had a tendency to be higher than the probability of staying on propafenone, due to a greater proportion of secondary effects with propafenone.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Fluoxetine impairs the CYP2D6-mediated metabolism of propafenone enantiomers in healthy Chinese volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of 20 mg/day fluoxetine on the pharmacokinetics of propafenone enantiomers and CYP2D6 activity by phenotyping with dextromethorphan. METHODS: Nine healthy Chinese volunteers (seven men and two women) were included in a two-phase study. Dextromethorphan (20 mg) was given before and after subjects took 20 mg/day fluoxetine for 10 days, and the dextromethorphan metabolic ratio was calculated to determine CYP2D6 phenotype. Pharmacokinetic studies of propafenone enantiomers after a single oral 400 mg dose before and after pretreatment with 20 mg/day fluoxetine for 10 days were also conducted in these subjects. Reversed-phase HPLC with precolumn derivatization was used to determine enantiomeric concentrations of propafenone in plasma. RESULTS: Mean CYP2D6 dextromethorphan metabolic ratios before and after fluoxetine therapy were 0.028 +/- 0.031 and 0.080 +/- 0.058, respectively (P = .001), indicating that a strong inhibition of CYP2D6 by fluoxetine activity was observed in Chinese subjects. Propafenone metabolism was also impaired significantly after fluoxetine treatment. The elimination half-life, peak concentration, and area under the curve from 0 hours to infinity of two enantiomers after fluoxetine therapy were significantly increased compared with those at baseline (P < .01), whereas oral clearance decreased from 75.01 +/- 17.69 L/h to 49.36 +/- 8.62 L/h for S-propafenone (P = .005) and from 107.62 +/- 33.82 L/h to 70.60 +/- 12.42 L/h for R-propafenone (P = .027). In addition, fluoxetine increased the peak concentration of S-propafenone by 39% and that of R-propafenone by 71% (P < .05). A significant increase of the time to reach peak concentration was observed only in the R-enantiomer and not in the S-enantiomer of propafenone after fluoxetine therapy. There were no differences in the percentage changes of PR and QRS intervals before or after fluoxetine pretreatment at the time observed (P > .05). CONCLUSION: We conclude that fluoxetine may cause significant inhibition of the CYP2D6 activity as determined by dextromethorphan phenotyping. This inhibition impairs the metabolism of propafenone enantiomers in Chinese subjects. Caution must be exercised when fluoxetine and propafenone are coadministered to avoid potential toxicity.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1990

The role of genetically determined polymorphic drug metabolism in the beta-blockade produced by propafenone.

Propranolol and the sodium-channel-blocking antiarrhythmic agent propafenone share structural features. Although propafenone's beta-blocking actions are readily demonstrable in vitro, clinically significant beta-blockade occurs inconsistently in vivo. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that genetically determined variations in the biotransformation of propafenone to its 5-hydroxy metabolite account for variations in the drug's beta-blocking action. We assessed beta-blockade by measuring the reduction in tachycardia produced by boluses of isoproterenol and treadmill exercise in 14 normal subjects during treatment with placebo and with 150, 225, and 300 mg of propafenone every eight hours for five days each. Nine subjects (with the extensive-metabolizer phenotype) metabolized most of the propafenone to 5-hydroxy propafenone, and five (with the poor-metabolizer phenotype) did not produce this metabolite. At the lower dosages, beta-blockade was present in both groups but was significantly greater in the subjects with poor metabolism, in whom deficient 5-hydroxylation was associated with higher plasma propafenone levels. At the highest dose, a similar degree of beta-blockade was observed in the two groups. Propafenone also had a higher affinity for beta 2 receptors in vitro than either of its major metabolites. We conclude that the degree of beta-blockade during propafenone therapy reflects genetically determined variations in the metabolism of the parent drug, which is necessary for beta-blockade, and that this action of propafenone is considerably enhanced in patients with deficient 5-hydroxylation of propafenone.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗