Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Proctocolectomy, Restorative”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

[Preservation of anal transitional zone in restorative proctocolectomy].

Since 1980, restorative proctocolectomy has been established for surgical therapy to ulcerative colitis. The crucial points of this procedure are mucosectomy of the anorectal mucosa and pouch anal anastomosis. Mucosectomy is often difficult due to long standing acute and chronic inflammation and incomplete microscopically and leakage of pouch anal anastomosis is relatively high probably due to steroid given prior to surgery or direct effect of anorectal mucosal inflammation. Regards to postoperative bowel function, nocternal soiling is frequently recognized in the patients who received this operation. To overcome these technical and functional disadvantages, anal transitional zone preservation without mucosectomy and stapled anastomosis between pouch and the upper rim of the puborectalis muscle has been performed. Our series of 84 cases with this modified method, anastomotic leakage was significantly decreased and nocternal soiling was completely disappeared within 7 months postoperatively. And one stage procedure became possible unless severe, or high doses of steroid given prior to surgery. Only one case of mild dysplasia was experienced in the remaining rectal mucosa which was disappeared at the next examination. Medical treatment to the remaining lesion was not necessary in the most of cases. Anal canal preservation is superior to mucosectomy in the points of bowel function and minimizing postoperative complications.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed2001

Consecutive series of laparoscopic-assisted vs. minilaparotomy restorative proctocolectomies.

PURPOSE: Compared with open restorative proctocolectomy, laparoscopic procedures may reduce postoperative recovery times and give a more cosmetically acceptable scar, but operative time may be prolonged. We describe a minilaparotomy technique for restorative proctocolectomy and compare recovery parameters with a laparoscopic procedure. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted restorative proctocolectomy were compared with a subsequent consecutive series of patients undergoing a minilaparotomy procedure. This method incorporates a suprapubic incision. Mobilization of the colon is performed in the usual manner with visualization of less accessible areas made possible by using an illuminated St. Mark's retractor. Operative and recovery parameters were analyzed for each group retrospectively. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were compared (12 in the laparoscopic group). Wound length was significantly longer in the open group (median, 14 vs. 8.5 cm; P < 0.01), but operative times were shorter (median, 120 vs. 150 minutes; P < 0.01). There were no differences in any of the recovery parameters analyzed, including analgesic requirements, time to ileostomy function, first fluid intake, time to solid diet, length of hospital stay, and complications. CONCLUSION: The only advantage of a laparoscopic-assisted procedure over a minilaparotomy technique was the size of the wound. The minilaparotomy restorative proctocolectomy achieves the same postoperative recovery parameters and has a shorter operative time. This technique is recommended for surgeons less experienced in laparoscopy.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed1995

Clinical and physiological evaluation of anorectal eversion during restorative proctocolectomy.

Fifty patients had a restorative proctocolectomy with stapled end-to-end ileoanal anastomosis by the eversion technique. Median (interquartile range) maximum resting anal pressure was 90 (73-116) cmH2O before restorative proctocolectomy and 71 (51-88) cmH2O 1 year after surgery (P < 0.001). Median maximum squeeze pressure was 141 (110-185) cmH2O before surgery and 146 (118-186) cmH2O 1 year after surgery (P not significant). Median thresholds for sensation in the lower third of the anal canal before and 1 year after surgery were 5.3 and 7.1 mA, respectively (P = 0.006). One year after restorative proctocolectomy, all patients were continent, although two experienced leakage of mucus requiring a pad. Forty-two patients (84 per cent) could discriminate between faeces and flatus. Eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy impairs the motor and sensory functions of the anal sphincter. Most patients achieved satisfactory anal continence, however, despite these physiological changes.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Salvage surgery after restorative proctocolectomy.

BACKGROUND AND METHOD: Restorative proctocolectomy is now the elective surgical procedure of choice for most patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. Complications may lead to failure, defined as removal of the reservoir with establishment of a permanent ileostomy or long-term diversion. Failure may be avoided for some patients by salvage surgery. The causes of failure are identified in this article and the procedures adopted to treat them are defined; a review of the literature was carried out to determine the effectiveness of the procedures. RESULTS: Failure after restorative proctocolectomy results from complications, which may occur indefinitely during follow-up to a cumulative rate of about 15 per cent at 10-15 years. Sepsis accounts for over 50 per cent of these complications. Abdominal salvage procedures are successful in 20 to over 80 per cent of patients but the rate of salvage is dependent on the duration of follow-up, which might explain this variance. Local procedures are successful in 50-60 per cent of patients with pouch-vaginal fistula. Poor function accounts for about 30 per cent of failures. Abdominal salvage for outlet obstruction and low pouch capacitance results in satisfactory or acceptable function in up to 70 per cent of patients. There is no effective surgical salvage for pouchitis. CONCLUSION: Salvage surgery must be discussed carefully with the patient, who should be made aware of the possible complications and the prospect of success, which is less than that in the general population of patients undergoing ileoanal pouch surgery.

Colectomy↗
PubMed2001

Glutamine distribution in patients with ulcerative colitis and in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis coli before and after restorative proctocolectomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Restorative proctocolectomy with construction of an ileoanal pouch (IPAA) is the surgical treatment of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). This procedure imposes an essential change in function on the terminal ileal mucosa and pouch mucosa. Glutamine is one of the major nutrients for the small-bowel mucosa; it is metabolized into glutamate and subsequently alanine in the human enterocyte. In a prospective clinical trial we compared glutamine distribution in patients with UC to that in patients with FAP before and after restorative proctocolectomy. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Concentrations of glutamine, glutamate, and alanine were measured pre- and postoperatively in the terminal ileal mucosa, pouch mucosa, skeletal muscle and venous blood of patients undergoing IPAA for UC or FAP. Healthy individuals served as controls for skeletal muscle glutamine concentration. RESULTS: After IPAA the glutamine concentration in UC patients was decreased in skeletal muscle. In the mucosa glutamine remained unaltered while glutamate and alanine concentrations increased. In plasma the glutamine concentration increased, the glutamate level fell, and the alanine level increased. In FAP patients the glutamine level was unchanged in skeletal muscle after IPAA. In mucosa the glutamine level did not change, but glutamate and alanine increased. In plasma the glutamine level remained unaltered, glutamate decreased, and alanine increased. CONCLUSION: Patients with UC or FAP before surgical therapy do not suffer from glutamine depletion. IPAA resulted in changes in the distribution of glutamine and its metabolites in skeletal muscle, plasma, and ileal pouch mucosa, particularly in patients with UC. Further studies should investigate whether characteristics in the glutamine distribution have any impact for the long-term outcome after IPAA.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed2004

Restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis complicated by colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is widely accepted as the procedure of choice for patients requiring surgery for chronic ulcerative colitis. The role of restorative proctocolectomy in the setting of chronic ulcerative colitis complicated by colorectal carcinoma is not clear. This study was undertaken to explore the clinical outcomes of chronic ulcerative colitis patients with coexisting colorectal carcinoma who underwent restorative proctocolectomy. METHODS: A total of 756 patients with chronic ulcerative colitis were followed prospectively after restorative proctocolectomy. Forty-five (5.9 percent) were found to have invasive carcinoma of the colon (n = 31) or rectum (n = 14). These patients were followed with special attention to cancer stage, adjuvant therapy, oncologic outcome, and functional results after restorative proctocolectomy. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (45.6 percent) had staged surgery (colon, 14; rectum, 7). Twenty-seven patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (colon, 22; rectum, 5). Fourteen patients (51.8 percent) who received chemotherapy were not diverted during this treatment. Two node-positive rectal cancer patients had pelvic radiotherapy: one before restorative proctocolectomy and one after restorative proctocolectomy. Mean time to restoration of intestinal continuity among staged patients did not differ between cancer and noncancer patients. Six patients died of metastatic disease (colon, 3; rectum, 3). Five deaths occurred among patients with Stage III disease (colon, 3/13, 23.1 percent; rectum, 2/3, 66.7 percent). One patient with Stage I cancer at the time of restorative proctocolectomy died. Thirty-nine patients are alive without evidence of disease at a mean interval from surgery of 76.5 months. Thirty-six patients have functioning pelvic pouches. Bowel frequency, continence, and complication rates are similar among restorative proctocolectomy patients with and without cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Restorative proctocolectomy as a single or staged procedure is a viable therapeutic option for selected chronic ulcerative colitis patients with associated colorectal cancers. Prognosis seems to be related to cancer stage. Adjuvant chemotherapy can safely be given to nondiverted patients. Appropriate use of preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients who are otherwise candidates for restorative proctocolectomy is unknown. Long-term functional results for cancer patients are similar to those seen in chronic ulcerative colitis patients without cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Factors influencing the functional outcome of restorative proctocolectomy in ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy is considered to be the procedure of choice in the operative treatment of ulcerative colitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome following operation and to identify possible predictive factors. METHODS: Some 168 patients (median age 32 years, 102 men) with ulcerative colitis underwent restorative proctocolectomy. The functional outcome was evaluated by a symptom index created from a questionnaire at a median of 29 (13-123) months of follow-up. The records of these patients were reviewed, and preoperative, peroperative and postoperative variables were registered and related to outcome. RESULTS: The response rate to the questionnaire was 155 (92 per cent) of 168. The symptom index was related to patients' overall assessment of outcome. In spite of a perceived good result many patients experienced a number of symptoms. Age over 50 years (P < 0.01), presence of extraintestinal manifestations (P < 0.05) and late complications, such as anastomotic stricture (P < 0.05), pouchitis (P < 0.01) and anal pain (P < 0.05), were related to a less favourable outcome. CONCLUSION: While preoperative data may help in selecting patients suitable for restorative proctocolectomy, prevention of late complications seems most important in improving the functional outcome.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Totally stapled restorative proctocolectomy.

BACKGROUND: Totally stapled restorative proctocolectomy (TSRP) has simplified ileoanal pouch surgery but few reports exist concerning experience with the technique. A retrospective study of operative and functional data in a consecutive series of patients undergoing TSRP was undertaken. METHODS: TSRP with J pouch formation was attempted in 103 patients between 1988 and 1995 (for ulcerative colitis (87 patients), familial adenomatous polyposis coli (nine), slow transit constipation (six) and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (one). Three technical failures resulted in 100 patients available for assessment. Case notes were reviewed together with functional assessment by clinical interview and/or postal questionnaire. RESULTS: Median operating time was 200 min, intraoperative blood loss 360 ml and hospital stay 12 days. There were no operative deaths. All but five patients (95 per cent) had loop ileostomy formation with subsequent reversal. There were 29 complications, six of which required further surgical intervention. Six pouches were excised and two patients had a temporary defunctioning ileostomy. Five patients were rediagnosed as having Crohn's disease, of whom four underwent subsequent pouch excision. Pouchitis (in the absence of Crohn's disease) occurred in eight patients (8 per cent). In 60 patients with at least 12 months of established function, median day and night stool frequencies were 5 and 1 respectively. Functional evaluation in 49 patients (82 per cent) revealed regular use of antidiarrhoeal medication in 21, urgency in 17, and total continence by day and night in 37 and 35 respectively. Fifty-three patients (88 per cent) were satisfied with the overall long-term outcome. CONCLUSION: TSRP is safe, has simplified a technically difficult operation and gives good long-term functional results.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Early results with restorative proctocolectomy.

The first 25 restorative proctocolectomies (RP) performed by one surgeon since 1986 are reviewed. Ulcerative colitis (23) and idiopathic megarectum (2) were the indications for surgery. The initial seven patients had a submucosal proctectomy and transanal hand sewn pouch-anal anastomosis. Eighteen patients had a totally stapled RP. One patient with malignancy died from factors unrelated to surgery. Complications developed in eight patients after pouch-anal anastomosis and in four patients after ileostomy closure. There was one pouch failure due to pelvic sepsis. No pelvic sepsis has occurred following a stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with defunctioning ileostomy. After a mean follow up period of 20.5 months all patients are continent (mean stool frequency = 4/day and 0.5/night). Soiling occurred in three patients who had a transanal hand sewn pouch-anal anastomosis. All patients in the stapled group have satisfactory control. Restorative proctocolectomy produces satisfactory operative and functional results which have improved as our experience has increased.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Restorative proctocolectomy: Ochsner Clinic experience.

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy, a standard operation for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis has significant complications, even in experienced hands. METHODS: We studied surgical outcome by retrospectively reviewing cases of restorative proctocolectomy done at Ochsner Foundation Hospital from 1982 to 1995. Demographic and clinical data from two periods (1982 to 1989 and 1989 to 1995) were compared to determine factors associated with improved outcome. RESULTS: We performed 145 ileal pouch-anal procedures. In 56 patients, 104 complications occurred. The more recent group had a greater incidence of inflammatory bowel disease, steroid use, and staged operations; reduced operative times and hospital stays; more general but fewer pouch-related complications. Pouch failures were similar for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative outcome appeared to be associated with technical experience, improved perioperative care, exclusion of patients with Crohn's disease,judicious surgical reoperation for pouch complications, and use of a 3-stage procedure in malnourished patients or those with acute or toxic colitis.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed1993

An audit of restorative proctocolectomy.

A total of 168 restorative proctocolectomies have been performed without mortality during the past nine years. Morbidity from pelvic sepsis (12%), ileoanal stricture (15%), and pouch related fistulas (16%) have become less with increasing experience of the operation. Pouch excision, which occurred in 30% of the first 50 patients was undertaken in only 4% in the last 68 patients. Despite this, intestinal obstruction (18%) continues to complicate the operation. We have abandoned restorative proctocolectomy after failed ileorectal anastomosis in patients with slow transit constipation as half have now requested pouch excision because of poor results. Failure to identify Crohn's disease continues to influence the outcome: in 10 patients now known to have Crohn's disease six developed post operative fistulas, three have required pouch excision. Sexual impairment has occurred in three male patients (4%). Ten women had children after operation, eight uncomplicated vaginal deliveries occurred without impaired continence. Seven of nine patients over 60 years of age have had a successful outcome. Our data also indicate that the operation may be justified in distal disease if urgency is socially inconvenient. Frequency of defecation is usually less than three per 24 hours in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis but remains variable in those with ulcerative colitis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Restorative proctocolectomy without diverting ileostomy.

PURPOSE: Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) by abdominal colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in the setting of chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) has gained widespread popularity among surgeons and patients. Traditionally, temporary loop ileostomy has been established proximal to the ileal pouch in an effort to mitigate the effects of any suture line complications that may occur. This study compares functional results and complications encountered after RPC with mucosectomy with and without temporary ileostomy. METHODS: One hundred forty-three consecutive patients with either CUC or FAP underwent RPC including mucosectomy and ileal "J" reservoir. Proximal loop ileostomy was performed in 69 patients, and ileostomy was omitted in 74. Ileostomy was omitted if the patient was taking no immunosuppressives and less than 20 mg of prednisone daily in the month preceding surgery, the anastomosis was absolutely tension-free, and blood supply to the pouch was excellent. RESULTS: There were no perioperative deaths. There were two instances of pelvic abscess, one in the diverted group and one in the nondiverted group. Occurrence of IPAA suture line dehiscence was not significantly different between the two groups (ileostomy, 4/69 (6 percent), vs. no ileostomy, 6/74 (8 percent); P > 0.05). Comparison of 129 patients with colitis with and without diversion also failed to demonstrate a significant difference with regard to IPAA suture line dehiscence (ileostomy, 4/69 (6 percent) vs. 4/60 (7 percent); P > 0.05). Frequency of bowel movements and continence were the same in both groups and were comparable with results obtained without mucosectomy. Mean hospital stay at time of RPC for the nondiverted group was significantly longer (12 days vs. 10 days; P = 0.0004). Significantly fewer patients without an ileostomy were hospitalized for partial intestinal obstruction (ileostomy, 13/69 (19 percent), vs. no ileostomy, 3/74 (4 percent); P = 0.02), and significantly fewer required enterolysis (ileostomy, 7/69 (10 percent), vs. no ileostomy, 1/74 (1 percent); P = 0.04). On average, patients without an ileostomy spent significantly fewer total days in the hospital (17 vs. 24; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Restorative proctocolectomy with mucosectomy and without ileostomy is the procedure of choice for selected patients with FAP and CUC. Septic complications and functional results are similar to those seen in patients managed with a stoma. Anastomotic leakage, when it occurs, can be safely managed in most cases without surgery. RPC without ileostomy results in significantly fewer episodes of intestinal obstruction, fewer instances of re-exploration, and fewer total days in the hospital.

Abscess↗
PubMed1992

Restorative proctocolectomy in patients after previous intestinal or anal surgery.

Restorative proctocolectomy is now established as the procedure of choice in many patients with ulcerative colitis or familial polyposis coli as well as in some patients with multiple colorectal tumors, ischemia, trauma, or congenital abnormalities. Some patients, however, may have had previous pelvic, abdominal, or perineal surgery, which might be considered a contraindication to restorative proctocolectomy. In a consecutive series of 73 private patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy under one surgeon, we have reviewed in detail 13 who had had previous "significant" abdominal, pelvic, or anal surgery. Eight patients had previously had surgery for fistula-in-ano or fissure-in-ano, two had had an anal sphincter repair, and three had undergone possibly compromising abdominal or pelvic surgery prior to restorative proctocolectomy. Twelve of the 13 made an uncomplicated recovery from restorative proctocolectomy, although one has since died from carcinomatosis. One patient died after closure of an ileostomy from a combination of enterocutaneous fistula, infection, bleeding, and a perforated duodenal ulcer. One patient developed sepsis, necessitating removal of the pouch, and is classified as a failure. Two of the remaining 11 have had minor long-term functional problems with nocturnal fecal incontinence, and one patient needs to catheterize the pouch to evacuate, but all three patients prefer a pouch to an ileostomy. Restorative proctocolectomy can be performed successfully even after previous pelvic, abdominal, or anal surgery with an acceptable complication rate when compared with pouch surgery in the uncompromised patient.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed2000

Columnar cuff cancer after restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis.

AIMS: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis is one of the treatments of choice for patients suffering from familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). However, any residual rectal mucosa left behind after mucosectomy is at risk for the development of neoplasia. CASE REPORT: A 31 year old male patient with FAP underwent restorative proctocolectomy with a pelvic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Seven years later he presented with right inguinal and perianal pain. A diagnosis of invasive columnar cuff carcinoma was made. DISCUSSION: Islets of columnar epithelium may be left behind after restorative proctocolectomy, exposing the patient to later malignant change. This risk must be emphasised and prevented by regular surveillance of the anastomosis.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

Restorative proctocolectomy: operative safety and functional outcomes.

Restorative proctocolectomy (total proctocolectomy and ileal J pouch anal anastomosis) has been accepted as the operation of choice in the setting of chronic ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. The purpose of this study was to assess operative safety and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. A total of sixteen patients underwent surgery between January 1996 and December 1999. Hand sewn anastomosis with diverting ileostomy was performed in 9 patients and double stapled anastomosis in 7 patients. The underlying disease was ulcerative colitis in 9 cases and familial adenomatous polyposis in 7. Postoperative complications developed in 8 cases (50%), and intestinal obstruction was found in 4 cases (2 cases were operated upon). Anastomosis related complications were stenosis (n=2), leak (n=1) and perianal abscess (n=1). All patients were followed up at the outpatient clinic using questionnaires, with a mean follow up period of 19.9 months. The frequency of bowel movement was 8.2 per day in hand sewn anastomosis (HS), and 12 per day in double stapled anastomosis (DS) 3 months after surgery (period 1). This frequency decreased to 5.5 per day in HS, and 4.6 per day in DS after one year (period 2). Day and night continence was shown in 12/15, and 5/15, respectively in period 1, but improved to 10/11, and 10/11, respectively in period 2. Night time incontinence was noted in 10 of 15 patients in period 1 (seepage 3/15, soiling 7/15). The need to take anti-diarrheal medication, and to use a pad was noted in 2/15, and 10/15, respectively in period 1, but no patient took antidiarrheal medication or wore a protective pad in period 2. Postoperative urinary function was satisfactory in 13/14 patients. Postoperative sexual function was analyzed in a total of 8 patients, who showed good erection (5/5), ejaculation (5/5) and satisfactory sexual life (5/5). In females, 3 patients showed a satisfactory sexual life. In conclusion, restorative proctocolectomy for chronic ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis can be performed safely with excellent functional outcomes, including bowel movement, urinary and sexual functions one year after surgery.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed1998

Is age relevant to functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis?: prospective assessment of 122 cases.

OBJECTIVE: Restorative proctocolectomy for mucosal ulcerative colitis is well established. However, the effect of age on physiologic sphincter parameters is poorly understood. Our objective was to determine whether age at the time of restorative proctocolectomy correlates with physiologic changes. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In the approximately 20 years during which restorative proctocolectomy has been performed for ulcerative colitis, the indications have changed. Initially, the procedure was recommended only in patients under approximately 50 years. However, the procedure has been considered in older patients because of the increasing age of our population, the increasing frequency of recognition of patients during the "second peak" of mucosal ulcerative colitis, and the decreasing morbidity rates, due to the learning curve and to newer techniques, such as double-stapling. Few authors have presented data analyzing the effects of this operation in older patients. METHODS: One hundred twenty-two patients who had undergone a two-stage restorative proctocolectomy for mucosal ulcerative colitis were divided into three groups according to age: group I (>60 years), 11 men, 6 women; group II (40-60 years), 29 men, 18 women; and group III (<40 years) 29 men, 29 women. The patients were prospectively evaluated using anal manometry and subjective functional results. Comparisons were made before surgery, after colectomy and before closure of ileostomy, and at 1 or more years after surgery. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the groups relative to manometric results, frequency of bowel movements, incontinence scores, or overall patient satisfaction. The postoperative mean and maximum resting pressures were significantly reduced (p < 0.001), and conversely the sensory threshold (p < 0.005) and capacity (p < 0.001) were increased in all groups up to 1 year after surgery. There were no statistically significant changes in the squeeze pressure or length of the high-pressure zone in any group at any point in time. After surgery, the mean and maximum resting pressures had returned to 80% of their original values. CONCLUSION: Although anorectal function is transiently somewhat impaired after restorative proctocolectomy, the impairment is not an age-related phenomenon.

Adult↗
PubMed2007

Risk of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVE: Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with or without mucosectomy is the treatment of choice for most patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) requiring surgery. The ileal mucosa in the reservoir and the anorectal columnar epithelium below the ileo-anal anastomosis are at risk of neoplastic transformation. METHOD: The literature has been reviewed to identify patients developing this complication and an attempt has been made to develop a rational follow-up policy based on the data available. RESULTS: Dysplasia in the ileal reservoir is rare. It is associated with histological type C changes, sclerosing cholangitis and unremitting pouchitis in the ileal mucosa and to the presence of sclerosing cholangitis. Nine patients who have developed adenocarcinoma in the residual anorectal mucosa and seven in the reservoir have been reported in the literature. A further hitherto unreported patient treated by the authors brings the total to 17 patients. Twelve of these had histopathological data on either dysplasia or carcinoma in the original operative specimen. The time intervals from the onset of UC and from the RPC to the development of cancer were 120-528 (median 246) and 16-216 (median 60) months respectively. Cancer appeared to be related to the duration of disease rather than to the interval from RPC. In all the reported patients the interval from the onset of UC was 10 years. CONCLUSION: Based on these data a surveillance programme should begin at 10 years from the onset of disease. Patients with dysplasia or carcinoma in the original specimen, those with type C ileal mucosal changes and patients with sclerosing cholangitis should be selected for surveillance. This will involve multiple biopsies of the ileal reservoir and the anorectal mucosa below the ileo-anal anastomosis.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

Totally laparoscopic versus conventional ileoanal pouch procedure--design of a single-centre, expertise based randomised controlled trial to compare the laparoscopic and conventional surgical approach in patients undergoing primary elective restorative proctocolectomy--LapConPouch-Trial.

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy is increasingly being performed minimal invasively but a totally laparoscopic technique has not yet been compared to the standard open technique in a randomized study. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a two armed, single centre, expertise based, preoperatively randomized, patient blinded study. It is designed as a two-group parallel superiority study. Power calculation revealed 80 patients per group in order to recruit the 65 patients to be analysed for the primary endpoint. The primary objective is to investigate intra-operative blood loss and the need for blood transfusions. We hypothesise that intra-operative blood loss and the need for peri-operative blood transfusions are significantly higher in the conventional group. Additionally a set of surgical and non-surgical parameters related to the operation will be analysed as secondary objectives. These will include operative time, complications, postoperative pain, lung function, postoperative length of hospital stay, a cosmetic score and pre-and postoperative quality of life. DISCUSSION: The trial will answer the question whether there is indeed an advantage in the laparoscopic group in regard to blood loss and the need for blood transfusions. Moreover, it will generate data on the safety and potential advantages and disadvantages of the minimally invasive approach.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗