Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Prochlorperazine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1982

Effects of prochlorperazine on experimental nephrotoxicity.

In early studies of the antitumor drug 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-(4-methylcyclohexyl)-1nitrosourea (methyl-CCNU), animal models consistently predicted that the compound would be nephrotoxic in humans. Nephrotoxicity in cancer patients who had received methyl-CCNU was not confirmed until about 6 years after clinical trials began. We have investigated the possibility that prochlorperazine, a commonly used antiemetic, might affect the development of nephrotoxicity. Prochlorperazine (1, 2, 5, and 8 mg/kg IP on days 1-3) produced a dose-related reduction in the concentrations of plasma urea nitrogen in mice that received nephrotoxic doses of methyl-CCNU (42, 52, or 63 mg/kg IP on day 1). The frequency and severity of renal lesions evaluated histopathologically were reduced significantly as the prochlorperazine dose increased. To study further this apparent protective activity of prochlorperazine, we chose a second nephrotoxin, mercuric chloride (HgCl2, 1 mg/kg IP on day 1) and a rodent species used more commonly as a model for nephrotoxicity, the rat. Prochlorperazine (2.5 or 10 mg/kg IP on days 1-5) inhibited HgCl2-induced urinary excretion of N-acetylglucosaminidase and leucine aminopeptidase. Urinary excretion of these enzymes on day 1 reflected proximal tubular epithelial degeneration and necrosis in rats that received HgCl2 alone. The severity of HgCl2-induced renal lesions evaluated histopathologically on day 16 was significantly reduced by combination treatment with prochlorperazine. Phenothiazines have numerous pharmacologic properties that might account for this observation, and additional studies will be required to establish the mechanism of this protective effect of prochlorperazine against acute nephrotoxicity in rodents.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Blockade of HERG human K+ channel and IKr of guinea pig cardiomyocytes by prochlorperazine.

Prochlorperazine, a drug for the symptomatic control of nausea, vomiting and psychiatric disorders, can induce prolonged QT, torsades de pointes and sudden death. We studied the effects of prochlorperazine on human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG) channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes and also in the delayed rectifier K+ current of guinea pig cardiomyocytes. Prochlorperazine induced a concentration-dependent decrease in current amplitudes at the end of the voltage steps and tail currents of HERG. The IC50 for a prochlorperazine block of HERG current in Xenopus oocytes progressively decreased relative to the degree of depolarization, from 42.1 microM at -40 mV to 37.4 microM at 0 mV to 22.6 microM at +40 mV. The block of HERG by prochlorperazine was use-dependent, exhibiting a more rapid onset and a greater steady-state block at higher frequencies of activation, while there was partial relief of the block with reduced frequencies. In guinea pig ventricular myocytes, bath applications of 0.5 and 1 muM prochlorperazine at 36 degrees C blocked rapidly activating delayed rectifier K+ current by 38.9% and 76.5%, respectively, but did not significantly block slowly activating delayed rectifier K+ current. Our findings suggest that the arrhythmogenic side effects of prochlorperazine are caused by a blockade of HERG and the rapid component of the delayed rectifier K+ current rather than by a blockade of the slow component.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Efficacy and tolerability of oral ondansetron versus prochlorperazine in the prevention of emesis associated with cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy and maintenance of health-related quality of life.

This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of oral ondansetron (8 mg twice daily [BID] for up to 3 days) with those of phenothiazine prochlorperazine (10 mg BID for up to 3 days) in 133 cancer patients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. In addition, the study evaluated the impact of these treatments on patients' health-related quality of life, measured with both the Functional Living Index--Cancer and the Functional Living Index--Emesis questionnaires. The first dose of study drug was administered 30 minutes before initiation of chemotherapy. Patients received a rescue antiemetic at their request or if the investigator deemed it necessary. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of patients with no emetic episodes over the 3-day study period: 60% in the ondansetron group compared with 21% in the prochlorperazine group. Twenty-five percent of ondansetron-treated patients compared with 68% of prochlorperazine-treated patients experienced three or more emetic episodes, rescue medication use, or withdrawal from the study due to adverse events or lack of efficacy of the study drug. Among patients with at least one emetic episode, the mean time to emesis was significantly longer (13 hours and 37 minutes) in the ondansetron group compared with the prochlorperazine group (9 hours and 30 minutes). Nausea and appetite scores did not differ significantly between groups. The score on the vomiting subscale of the Functional Living Index--Emesis was significantly more favorable in the ondansetron group compared with the prochlorperazine group, indicating better maintenance of health-related quality of life in ondansetron-treated patients. Both treatments were well tolerated. The most common potentially drug-related adverse event was headache, which occurred in significantly more (16%) ondansetron-treated patients compared with prochlorperazine-treated patients (3%). The results of this study demonstrate that oral ondansetron 8 mg BID for up to 3 days is more effective than prochlorperazine 10 mg BID for up to 3 days in the prevention of emesis associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Efficacy and tolerability of oral ondansetron versus prochlorperazine in the prevention of emesis associated with cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy and maintenance of health-related quality of life.

This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of oral ondansetron (8 mg twice daily [BID] for up to 3 days) with those of phenothiazine prochlorperazine (10 mg BID for up to 3 days) in 133 cancer patients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. In addition, the study evaluated the impact of these treatments on patients' health-related quality of life, measured with both the Functional Living Index-Cancer and the Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaires. The first dose of study drug was administered 30 minutes before initiation of chemotherapy. Patients received a rescue antiemetic at their request or if the investigator deemed it necessary. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of patients with no emetic episodes over the 3-day study period: 60% in the ondansetron group compared with 21% in the prochlorperazine group. Twenty-five percent of ondansetron-treated patients compared with 68% of prochlorperazine-treated patients experienced three or more emetic episodes, rescue medication use, or withdrawal from the study due to emesis or adverse events. Among patients with at least one emetic episode, the mean time to emesis was significantly longer (13 hours and 37 minutes) in the ondansetron group compared with the prochlorperazine group (9 hours and 30 minutes). Nausea and appetite scores did not differ significantly between groups. The score on the vomiting subscale of the Functional Living Index-Emesis was significantly more favorable in the ondansetron group compared with the prochlorperazine group, indicating better maintenance of health-related quality of life in ondansetron-treated patients. Both treatments were well tolerated. The most common potentially drug-related adverse event was headache, which occurred in significantly more (16%) ondansetron-treated patients compared with prochlorperazine-treated patients (3%). The results of this study demonstrate that oral ondansetron 8 mg BID for up to 3 days is more effective than prochlorperazine 10 mg BID for up to 3 days in the prevention of emesis associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Repetitive intravenous prochlorperazine treatment of patients with refractory chronic daily headache.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and long-term outcome of intravenous prochlorperazine for the treatment of refractory chronic daily headache. BACKGROUND: Unlike dihydroergotamine, the treatment results of intravenous neuroleptics as first-line agents for refractory chronic daily headache have rarely been reported. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of inpatients with refractory chronic daily headache who received intravenous repetitive prochlorperazine treatment from November 1996 to March 1999. A semistructured telephone follow-up interview was done in September 1999. RESULTS: A total of 135 patients (44 men, 91 women) were recruited, including 95 (70%) with analgesic overuse. After intravenous prochlorperazine treatment, 121 (90%) achieved a 50% or greater reduction of headache intensity, including 85 (63%) who became headache-free. The mean hospital stay was 6.2 +/- 2.7 days, and mean total prochlorperazine used was 98 +/- 48 mg. Acute extrapyramidal symptoms occurred in 21 patients (16%). One hundred twenty-four patients (92%) were successfully followed up, with a mean duration of 14.3 +/- 7.5 months. Compared with pretreatment status, 93 patients (75%) considered their headache intensity decreased, and 86 patients (69%) considered their headache frequency decreased, although 40 (32%) still had a daily headache. Of the 87 patients with analgesic overuse who could be followed, 61 (70%) no longer overused analgesics. Poor response to prochlorperazine treatment (relative risk, 1.8) and presence of major depression (relative risk, 1.8) were predictors of persistent chronic daily headache at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Prochlorperazine was effective and safe in the treatment of patients with refractory chronic daily headache with or without analgesic overuse. Compared with dihydroergotamine, prochlorperazine seemed less effective at achieving "freedom from headache" during hospitalization, but had a similar outcome at follow-up.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Diphenhydramine for the prevention of akathisia induced by prochlorperazine: a randomized, controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The utility of intravenous prochlorperazine as an antiemetic agent and abortive therapy for headache may be limited by the frequent occurrence of akathisia, the distressing effects of which have been shown to disrupt patient care. We tested the hypothesis that adjuvant diphenhydramine reduces the incidence of akathisia induced by prochlorperazine. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in the emergency department of an academic tertiary care medical center with an annual census of 95,000 emergency patient visits. We enrolled a convenience sample of 100 adult patients who received 10 mg of intravenous prochlorperazine for the treatment of nausea/vomiting or headache. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive a 2-minute infusion of prochlorperazine with either 50 mg of diphenhydramine or placebo. The incidence of akathisia at 1 hour was measured by using explicit diagnostic criteria. To measure the influence of treatment on sedation, the subjects noted, on a 100-mm visual analog scale, their degree of sedation before and after treatment. RESULTS: Akathisia developed in 18 (36%) of 50 subjects in the control group and in 7 (14%) of 50 subjects in the diphenhydramine group, a 61% relative reduction. The addition of adjunct diphenhydramine resulted in an absolute reduction of 22% in the incidence of akathisia (95% confidence interval [CI] 6% to 38%; P = .01). The odds ratio for akathisia with the use of adjuvant diphenhydramine was 0.39 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.85). Mean sedation scores increased 12 mm after infusion of prochlorperazine alone (95% CI 3 to 21 mm) compared with a 33-mm increase after infusion of prochlorperazine with adjuvant diphenhydramine (95% CI 24 to 42 mm). The 12-mm difference between the groups was statistically significant (95% CI 9 to 34 mm, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant diphenhydramine reduces the incidence of akathisia induced by prochlorperazine and is associated with an increase in sedation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Preliminary studies of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prochlorperazine in healthy volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prochlorperazine were studied in healthy volunteers using a recently developed h.p.l.c. assay. Eight subjects received 12.5 mg and 6.25 mg i.v. doses of prochlorperazine, a 25 mg oral dose and placebo in random order. Plasma half-life (t1/2) of prochlorperazine was 6.8 +/- 0.7 h and 6.9 +/- 0.8 h for the 12.5 mg and 6.25 mg i.v. doses respectively. Apparent volume of distribution and plasma clearance were high and the kinetics did not appear to be dose-related. Absorption of oral prochlorperazine appeared to be slow and bioavailability was very low. A metabolite, possibly prochlorperazine sulphoxide, was noted after oral dosing. Mild sedation was common after i.v. prochlorperazine, but cardiovascular effects were minimal. The main adverse effect was akathisia which was reported by five out of eight subjects after the higher i.v. dose. These results provide preliminary information on the pharmacokinetics of i.v. prochlorperazine which were previously unknown.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1992

Pharmacokinetics and safety of prochlorperazine in paediatric patients receiving cancer chemotherapy.

Nausea and vomiting are common clinical problems in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Metoclopramide is often used but frequently causes extrapyramidal reactions. As an alternative, prochlorperazine is prescribed but no data on its pharmacokinetics in paediatric patients are available to guide the choice of suitable dosages. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of intravenous prochlorperazine in paediatric patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Eleven patients (ages 1-9 years) who received high doses of cisplatin or cyclophosphamide were given three to four intermittent doses of 0.2 mg/kg prochlorperazine i.v. over a period of 6-9 h. Multiple blood samples were collected and prochlorperazine was quantified by a specific gas-liquid chromatographic method. The peak serum concentrations ranged from 402 to 5,608 ng/ml. The total clearance and elimination half-life ranged from 0.03 to 0.28 (mean: 0.12) litre/kg/h, and from 1.2 to 15.5 (mean: 5.6) h, respectively. No adverse effects were observed in our patients. Three patients had uncontrolled episodes of vomiting during prochlorperazine therapy. These data suggest: (i) that there was a substantial interpatient variability in prochlorperazine pharmacokinetics thus the dose requirement differed among patients; and (ii) that prochlorperazine appeared safe at the doses used but higher doses may be required to control nausea and vomiting in some paediatric patients receiving high-dose cisplatin or cyclophosphamide therapy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Cost-effectiveness analysis of ondansetron and prochlorperazine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of 2 antiemetic agents, ondansetron and prochlorperazine, for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing total hip replacement or total knee replacement procedures. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness analysis model was applied to data derived from a previous clinical study conducted in 1995 and 1996. This study involved 78 adult patients (62.8% female and 37.2% male) undergoing total hip replacement or total knee replacement procedures. Patients were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind manner to receive either ondansetron 4 mg intrvenously (n=37) or prochlorperazine 10 mg intramuscularly (n=41) immediately upon completion of surgery and were monitored for occurrences of PONV during the subsequent 48 hours. In our analysis, we measured the cost-effectiveness ratio (C/E ratio), defined as the cost per successfully treated patient, for each antiemetic agent using the clinical data obtained from the previous study. RESULTS: The incidence of PONV and use of rescue antiemetics was significantly greater in the ondansetron group compared with the prochlorperazine group. The mean total costs of PONV management per patient in the prochlorperazine and ondansetron groups were dollar 13.99 and dollar 51.98, respectively (based on 2004 average wholesale prices [AWP]). The cost of successfully treating one patient with prochlorperazine and ondansetron was dollar 31.87 and dollar 275.01, respectively. One-way sensitivity analysis was performed adjusting the percent efficacy rate of each antiemetic and the drug cost of ondansetron (up to a 50% reduction in AWP). Prochlorperazine remained the dominant strategy across each scenario. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that prochlorperazine is a more cost-effective antiemetic compared with ondansetron for the prevention of PONV in a mixed gender, adult inpatient population undergoing total joint arthroplasty.

Antiemetics↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Double-blind crossover trial of droperidol, metoclopramide, and prochlorperazine as antiemetics in cisplatin therapy.

Droperidol, metoclopramide, and prochlorperazine were compared in a double-blind crossover trial to determine their relative effectiveness in preventing and controlling the nausea and vomiting caused by cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Twenty-five patients receiving cisplatin-containing chemotherapy for various malignancies were entered into this trial with 14 patients completing the three-drug randomization sequence. This was the patient's first exposure to cisplatin. Each antiemetic was administered in a diluted 50 ml i.v. injection over 15 minutes beginning 0.5 hour before cisplatin and 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, and 8.5 hours after cisplatin. Dosages of antiemetics for doses of cisplatin greater than or equal to 100 mg/sq m were droperidol 2.5 mg, metoclopramide 2 mg/kg, or prochlorperazine 5 mg in each infusion. For doses of cisplatin less than 100 mg/sq m, the dosages were droperidol 2.5 mg for the first two doses and 1.25 mg for subsequent doses, metoclopramide 1 mg/kg, or prochlorperazine 5 mg for each dose. The median number of emetic episodes for the first 24 hours were as follows: droperidol 3.2; metoclopramide 1.8; prochlorperazine 3.7. There was a significant difference in number of emetic episodes demonstrating antiemetic superiority of metoclopramide over both droperidol and prochlorperazine. For these 14 patients completing the trial, eight preferred metoclopramide, two preferred prochlorperazine, one preferred droperidol, and three had no preference. At the doses used in this study, the antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide was superior to either droperidol or prochlorperazine.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

High doses of prochlorperazine for cisplatin-induced emesis. A prospective, random, dose-response study.

This study investigated the antiemetic properties of four different doses of prochlorperazine (10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg, 40 mg) when given randomly to patients receiving four cycles of the same dose of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Prochlorperazine was given to 71 patients by slow intravenous infusion 30 minutes before and 3 and 6 hours after the start of cisplatin chemotherapy. The higher doses of prochlorperazine proved to be effective in the control of cisplatin-induced emesis. For the 20 patients who completed all 4 study cycles of treatment, a relationship was discerned between the dose of prochlorperazine administered and the antiemetic effect. When all 71 patients were analyzed in terms of the results of the first cycle of chemotherapy, a significant dose-response effect was also found. Overall toxic reactions in 82 treatment cycles using either 30 mg or 40 mg of prochlorperazine were dystonia (1 patient), restlessness (2), hypotension (3), and drowsiness (12). This study demonstrates that higher-than-conventional doses of prochlorperazine have an impressive antinauseant effect with only moderate toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Intramuscular prochlorperazine versus metoclopramide as single-agent therapy for the treatment of acute migraine headache.

To compare the efficacy of intramuscular prochlorperazine and metoclopramide in the short-term treatment of migraine headache in the emergency department 86 eligible adult patients with moderate to severe migraine headache were evaluated prospectively at a university-affiliated community hospital. After randomization, each subject received a 2-mL intramuscular injection of sterile saline, prochlorperazine (10 mg), or metoclopramide (10 mg). No other analgesics were administered during the 60-minute study period; patient assessment of relief was followed using visual analog scales. Reduction in median headache scores was significantly better among those treated with prochlorperazine (67%) compared to metoclopramide (34%) or placebo (16%). Similarly, symptoms of nausea and vomiting were significantly relieved in the prochlorperazine group (chi 2 = 17.1, P < .001). However, rescue analgesic therapy was necessary in the majority of patients treated with prochlorperazine (16/28) and metoclopramide (23/29) after the 60-minute study period. Although intramuscular prochlorperazine appears to provides more effective relief than metoclopramide, these results do not recommend either drug as single-agent therapy for acute migraine headache.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Intravenous ketorolac vs intravenous prochlorperazine for the treatment of migraine headaches.

OBJECTIVE: To compare i.v. ketorolac with i.v. prochlorperazine as the initial treatment of migraine headaches in the ED. METHODS: A prospective, double-blind comparison study was performed, using a convenience sample of 64 patients suffering from migraine headaches presenting to the ED at a tertiary care university teaching hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg of prochlorperazine i.v. or 30 mg of ketorolac i.v.. Patients scored the severity of their headaches using a 10-cm visual analog pain scale. An initial mark was made on the scale at the time of entry into the study and later another mark was made on a new unmarked pain scale 1 hour after medication administration. Changes in pain scores within each treatment group and between groups were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: Prior to treatment, the patients assigned to receive prochlorperazine had a median score of 9.2 cm (mean +/- SD pain score of 8.3 cm +/- 2.1 cm), while the patients receiving ketorolac had a median score of 9.0 (mean pain score of 8.4 cm +/- 1.7 cm). There was no significant difference between the pain scores of the participants in the 2 groups prior to treatment (p = 0.80). One hour after medication administration, the patients in the prochlorperazine group had a median score of 0.5 cm (mean 2.1 +/- 3.2 cm), while those patients receiving ketorolac had a median pain score of 3.9 (mean 4.0 +/- 3.3 cm). The decrease in pain score was significant for both groups of patients (p = 0.0001). The change in pain score for the patients in the prochlorperazine group (median 7.1) was significantly greater than the change in pain score for the patients in the ketorolac group (median 4.0; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Although both drugs were associated with a significant reduction in pain scores, benefit over a placebo agent was not tested. Furthermore, the patients who received prochlorperazine i.v. for migraine headaches had a statistically significant greater decrease in their pain scores than did those receiving ketorolac i.v.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

Augmentation of ventilatory response to asphyxia by prochlorperazine in humans.

The effect of the dopamine-receptor blocking agent prochlorperazine on the ventilatory response to hypercapnic hypoxia was studied in six healthy adults. Repeated episodes of transient hypoxia were induced at the mixed venous PCO2 level by a nonrebreathing technique in five males and one female before and after an intravenous bolus injection of prochlorperazine mesylate (12.5 mg = 10 mg base). The ventilatory response to CO2 was also studied before and after drug administration. Prochlorperazine produced a modest (15%) increase in resting ventilation (P less than 0.05) but a marked increase in the ventilatory response to asphyxia such that the group mean response was double the control value [2.0 +/- 0.7 vs. 4.2 +/- 1.5 l . min-1 . % arterial O2 saturation (%SaO2); P less than 0.001]. Two-thirds of this change in ventilatory response was due to an increase in frequency response to hypoxia (0.34 +/- 0.20 vs. 0.81 +/- 0.52 breaths . min-1 . %SaO2; P less than 0.001). The position of the ventilatory response line, as judged by the computed ventilation at 95% SaO2, was increased by prochlorperazine (22.2 +/- 9.6 vs. 35.9 +/- 10.9 l . min-1; P less than 0.01) due to an increase in both tidal volume (P less than 0.05) and frequency of breathing (P less than 0.0125). The ventilatory response to CO2 was unchanged by drug injection. In separate experiments prochlorperazine was shown to 1) increase the ventilatory response to steady-state eucapnic hypoxia (P less than 0.01) demonstrating that the drug effect was not dependent on either the presence of hypercapnia or rapidly changing states of arterial oxygenation; and 2) reverse the depressant effect of intravenously infused dopamine hydrochloride (5 micrograms . kg-1 . min-1) on the ventilatory response to transient asphyxia (P less than 0.01). We conclude that prochlorperazine augments hypoxic responsiveness in humans. The mechanism may be blockade of dopaminergic receptors that modulate carotid body discharge.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

The effects of combined morphine and prochlorperazine on ventilatory control in humans.

Recent studies have shown that the antiemetic neuroleptic drug, prochlorperazine, is a potent stimulant of the ventilatory response to hypoxia. To investigate whether or not this effect persisted in the presence of central depression of ventilatory drive, the effects on ventilatory control of morphine with and without prochlorperazine were studied in 12 normal humans. Measurement of resting ventilation and the ventilatory responses to progressive hypercapnia and to transient asphyxia were made before and 15 min after morphine (0.15 mg/kg) given intravenously. Prochlorperazine (12.5 mg) was then administered intravenously to 6 study subjects and saline to 6 control subjects. After a further 10 min, resting ventilation and chemoreceptor function were remeasured. After the administration of morphine, resting ventilation, the ventilatory response to hypercapnia, and the ventilatory response to asphyxia were all significantly decreased (p less than 0.01 in each case; mean effect in control and study group were, respectively, -16 and -17%, -50 and -32%, -46 and -55%). Administration of saline produced no significant additional changes in the 6 control subjects. By contrast, administration of prochlorperazine to the 6 study subjects markedly increased the ventilatory response to asphyxia to levels significantly greater than postmorphine values (p less than 0.005; 2.38 +/- 0.22 L . min-1 . % Sao2 versus 0.80 +/- 0.14 L . min-1; mean +/- SEM). Resting ventilation and ventilatory response to hypercapnia were not significantly affected by prochlorperazine. These results were not explained by differences in end-tidal PCO2 at which hypercapnic hypoxic tests were performed. It is concluded that prochlorperazine reverses the depression of the ventilatory response to asphyxia caused by morphine.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

A comparison of the antiemetic efficacy of prochlorperazine and metoclopramide for the treatment of cisplatin-induced emesis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

This study compared high-dose metoclopramide and prochlorperazine for their antiemetic activities in the treatment of patients with solid tumors receiving cisplatin-based cancer chemotherapy, in a prospective, double-blind fashion. Sixty patients were entered in the study, and 28 patients on each regimen were evaluable. For regimen 1, metoclopramide was given intravenously (IV) over 15 minutes at a dose of 2 mg/kg 30 minutes before, 30 minutes after, and three hours after treatment with cisplatin. In regimen 2, prochlorperazine was given IV 30 minutes before and three hours after the cisplatin; a placebo was administered at 30 minutes after cisplatin. There was no statistically significant difference between the two regimens in their antiemetic efficacies during the first three hours. For emesis that occurred from three to 24 hours after administration of cisplatin, prochlorperazine was marginally superior. The median number of emeses in the metoclopramide regimen was 2.5 (range, 0 to 10+) compared to 1.0 (range, 0 to 10+) in the prochlorperazine regimen. This is not a significant difference. The overall incidence of adverse reactions was greater in the metoclopramide regimen, with drowsiness being the most common toxicity for both antiemetic programs. Thus, IV high-dose metoclopramide and prochlorperazine are similar and effective in the management of cisplatin-induced emesis. IV prochlorperazine at 20-mg dosage is surprisingly effective.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Effect of prochlorperazine as a sensitizer of rat skin on radiation-induced AMP metabolism.

The role of AMP was investigated in radiosensitization by the use of prochlorperazine in normal rat skin. AMP metabolism was evaluated by estimating the level of activities of 5' nucleotidase vis-à-vis protein, DNA and RNA contents in prochlorperazine-treated plus irradiated skin. To study radiation-induced changes in the skin, the extent of lipid peroxidation was measured in terms of enzyme lipid peroxidase. After irradiation, lipid peroxidase activity was observed to increase in prochlorperazine-treated rat skin. Subsequently the level of 5' nucleotidase was found to decrease in drug-treated plus irradiation skin. Similarly, the suppression in the levels of DNA, RNA and protein contents increased when the rat skins was irradiated in the presence of sensitizer prochlorperazine. The cytological examination, which revealed the extent of the lesions occurring in the normal rat skin, and the biochemical examination demonstrated increased cellular lethality in prochlorperazine-sensitized skin after irradiation. The results suggest that prochlorperazine probably sensitizes the normal skin tissues to radiation by inhibiting AMP metabolism via hydroxy-radical-induced decrease in DNA, RNA and protein metabolism.

5'-Nucleotidase↗
PubMed1998

Efficacy of ondansetron and prochlorperazine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after total hip replacement or total knee replacement procedures: a randomized, double-blind, comparative trial.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the efficacy of ondansetron hydrochloride compared with prochlorperazine maleate for the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the comparative efficacy of ondansetron and prochlorperazine for the prophylaxis of PONV in patients undergoing total hip replacement or total knee replacement procedures. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, comparative trial was conducted at a tertiary care, university hospital. Seventy-eight patients undergoing elective total hip or total knee replacement procedures received a single dose of ondansetron hydrochloride (n = 37), 4 mg intravenously, or prochlorperazine maleate (n = 41), 10 mg intramuscularly, at the end of the surgical procedure. Rescue therapy was administered every 4 hours as needed during the initial 48 hours. Primary outcome measures were the incidences and severity of PONV. Secondary outcome measures included the number of rescue antiemetic doses required, number of physical therapy cancellations because of PONV, length of hospital stay, and cost of antiemetic agents administered. RESULTS: The incidence of nausea was significantly greater in the ondansetron group compared with the prochlorperazine group (81% vs 56%; odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-9.4) as was the severity of nausea (P = .04). Multivariate analysis identified administration of ondansetron, history of PONV, obesity, and female sex as risk factors for a nausea event. The incidence of vomiting tended to be greater in the ondansetron group (49% vs 32%; odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-5.0). The need for rescue antiemetic therapy was also greater in the ondansetron group (46% vs 27%; odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-6.0). The mean antiemetic drug cost per patient was significantly greater for the ondansetron group ($47.56 vs $2.47; P<.001). However, the proportion of patients who were unable to participate in physical therapy because of PONV and the median length of hospital stay were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Prochlorperazine is associated with superior efficacy and significant cost savings compared with ondansetron for the prevention of PONV in patients undergoing total hip and total knee replacement procedures.

Adult↗