Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Perindopril”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Persistent effects on blood pressure and renal function of perindopril alone or combined with losartan in Lyon hypertensive rats.

BACKGROUND: In Lyon genetically hypertensive (LH) rats, an early and long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition with perindopril prevents their hypertension and renal alterations. The present work aimed to determine whether: 1) these effects persist after treatment withdrawal; 2) a short-term additional angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockade with losartan potentiates these effects; and 3) an early combination of low doses of perindopril and losartan produces the same prolonged effects as monotherapy with a higher dose of perindopril. METHODS: Perindopril (0.4 or 3 mg/kg/day orally) was given from 3 to 12 weeks of age to male LH rats. In other perindopril-treated LH rats, losartan (10 mg/kg/day orally) was added 1 week before perindopril withdrawal and during a 3-week period. In another group of LH rats, perindopril (0.1 mg/kg/day) and losartan (2.5 mg/kg/day) were given together from 3 to 12 weeks. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were monitored using radio-telemetry and renal function studied in anesthetized rats. RESULTS: Eight weeks after perindopril withdrawal, a significant reduction (P < .05) in SBP and DBP was observed with the both doses (SBP: 135 +/- 3, 139 +/- 5 v 157 +/- 4; DBP: 89 +/- 4, 93 +/- 5 v 111 +/- 3 mm Hg for 0.4 and 3 mg/kg/day v untreated LH rats). This was accompanied by a persistent decrease in urinary protein excretion and a long-lasting improvement in pressure natriuresis. The persistent antihypertensive effect was not improved by short-term addition of losartan. Interestingly, the early combination of perindopril with losartan at fourfold lower doses produced similar persistent antihypertensive and renoprotective effects. CONCLUSIONS: The blood pressure reduction produced by an early ACE inhibition in LH rats persists long after treatment withdrawal and is associated with an improvement in renal function. The combination of low doses of perindopril and losartan reveals a long-term effect similar to that of a monotherapy with a higher dose of perindopril.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers↗
PubMed1999

Double-blind, randomized, multicentre comparison of the effects of amlodipine and perindopril on 24 h therapeutic coverage and beyond in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. General Physicians Investigators' Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the therapeutic coverage and safety of amlodipine and perindopril in patients with mild to moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pressure > or = 90 mmHg and < or = 109 mmHg). DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicentre study. METHODS: Following a 2-week placebo wash-out period, the patients were randomly allocated to treatment with either amlodipine at 5-10 mg once a day or perindopril at 4-8 mg once a day, for 60 days. Trough: peak ratios were calculated by two different methods (global and individualized approaches) from 24 h ambulatory blood pressure recordings made after the placebo period and after the active treatment period. Residual lowering of blood pressure after single-blind, single-dose omission was also investigated with further 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Safety assessments were made throughout the study. RESULTS: The placebo-adjusted, global, diastolic blood pressure trough: peak ratio was 0.80 in the amlodipine group (n = 47) and 0.81 in the perindopril group (n = 49) in an intent-to-treat analysis. The corresponding global systolic blood pressure trough: peak ratio was 0.83 for amlodipine and 0.68 for perindopril. Individual trough: peak ratios were non-normally distributed. Mean (+/- SD) individual trough: peak ratios (intent-to-treat analysis) for diatolic blood pressure were 0.50 +/- 0.69 for amlodipine (median 0.42) and 0.15 +/- 3.27 for perindopril (median 0.33). In the per protocol analysis, the corresponding values were 0.50 +/- 0.72 (median 0.34) for amlodipine and 0.01 +/- 3.90 for perindopril (median 0.21). Both treatments produced comparable decreases in clinic systolic and diastolic blood pressure between days 0 and 60. Forty-eight hours after the last dose, both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were lower in amlodipine-treated patients than perindopril-treated patients. Amlodipine and perindopril were generally well tolerated. The most frequently reported adverse event was leg oedema in amlodipine-treated patients (19.1%), and coughing in perindopril-treated patients (14.3%). CONCLUSIONS: These results showed no statistically significant difference in trough: peak ratios between amlodipine and perindopril. However, the ambulatory blood pressure trough: peak ratios showed very large variations. Determination of trough: peak ratios by the conventional approach or by an individual approach can yield disparate values. After omitting one dose, a condition imitating noncompliance, blood pressure was more effectively controlled with amlodipine than with perindopril.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

A randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group comparison of perindopril and candesartan in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: When choosing an antihypertensive drug for patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus (DM), the metabolic side effects, possibility of improving some metabolic parameters, and need for adequate blood pressure control must all be considered. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the impacts of perindopril and candesartan on blood pressure, glucose metabolism, serum lipid profile, and metabolic parameters in patients with mild hypertension and type 2 DM during therapy and after a 1-month washout period. METHODS: Type 2 DM patients with mild hypertension and good glucose control who were not taking hypercholesterolemic drugs were enrolled. Perindopril 4 mg QD or candesartan 16 mg QD was administered for 12 months in this randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), glycosylated hemoglobin, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), homocysteine, body mass index (BMI), and albumin excretion rate (AER) were assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients (49 women and 47 men; mean [SD] ages, 53 [10] years [perindopril] and 55 [9] years [candesartan]) were enrolled. Mean (SD) body weight, height, and BMI were 78.2 (9.4) kg, 1.69 (0.05) m, and 27.2 (2.0) kg/m(2) in the perindopril group and 77.5 (8.6) kg, 1.70 (0.06) m, and 26.8 (2.5) kg/m(2) in the candesartan group. A significant change occurred from baseline to month 12 during treatment with perindopril in SBP and DBP (both P < 0.01), FPG (P < 0.05), FPI (P < 0.05), TC (P < 0.05), LDL-C (P < 0.05), Lp(a) (P < 0.05), PAM (P < 0.05), and AER (P < 0.05). Significant changes from baseline to month 12 occurred with candesartan in SBP and DBP (both P < 0.01) and AER (P < 0.05). The HOMA index was significantly lower at month 12 in the perindopril group than in the candesartan group (P < 0.05). When we interrupted perindopril and candesartan therapy for a 1-month washout period, changes in SBP and DBP values were significant compared with month 12 in both groups (all P < 0.05). Changes in TC and LDL-C from month 12 to the end of washout were significant only in the perindopril group (both P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Perindopril and candesartan both effectively lowered blood pressure in this group of patients with mild hypertension and type 2 DM. Perindopril showed an improvement on some metabolic parameters compared with candesartan. However, the inclusion/exclusion criteria could limit the ability to extrapolate the results to a general population.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed2005

A comparison of valsartan and perindopril in the treatment of essential hypertension in the malaysian population.

This study was conducted to determine the tolerability and efficacy of valsartan (DIOVAN) compared to perindopril (COVERSYL) in Malaysian patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Two hundred and fifty adult Malaysian patients with a mean sitting diastolic blood pressure of more than 95 mmHg and less than 115 mmHg after a 14 day washout period were randomized to receive either valsartan 80 mg once daily (n=125) or perindopril 4 mg daily (n=125) for eight weeks. The primary end point for efficacy was the change in mean sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SiSBP and SiDBP). The primary criteria for evaluation of tolerability was the incidence of adverse events. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to sex, age, weight, baseline sitting and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressure. At 0, 4 and 8 weeks the mean SiDBP in the valsartan group were 101.4, 92.8 and 91.0 mmHg respectively. The corresponding BP for the perindopril treated group was 102.6, 93.8 and 93.2 mmHg. (95% CI -1.39 to +3.27). There were no significant differences in the mean BP measurements between the valsartan and perindopril group at 0, 4 and 8 weeks. In each group there were significant differences between the BP at 4 and 8 weeks compared to baseline. A similar pattern was seen with SiSBP. At 4 weeks 28.7% of the valsartan and 25% of the perindopril group had their BP normalized (SiDBP <90 mmHg) The percentages of patients who responded (SiDBP reduction >10 mmHg but SiDBP >90 mmHg) were 21.3 in the valsartan group and 20.8 in the perindopril group. At 8 weeks, 31.1% of the valsartan group and 30.8% of the perindopril group had their BP normalized. The response rate was 27% and 22.5% for valsartan and perindopril respectively. The major adverse event was cough which occurred in 18 patients (14.4%) in the perindopril and 1 (0.8%) in the valsartan group at 4 weeks. At 8 weeks the figures were 24 (19.2%) and 2 (1.6%) respectively. The results indicate that Valsartan is safe and efficacious in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. It is equally efficacious to Perindopril and not associated with any major adverse event. It has a better tolerability profile with respect to dry cough.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of the effect of perindopril and acebutolol on cerebral hemodynamics in hypertensive patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare effect of perindopril (4 mg once a day) versus acebutolol (400 mg once a day) on cerebral hemodynamics in hypertensive patients. METHODS: Thirty untreated patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension were studied. Drug influences on Doppler-derived parameters from the cerebral blood flow (CBF) velocity wave form were evaluated in a randomized, double blind, cross-over, placebo controlled study. The mean CBF velocity, pulsatility index (PI), cerebrovascular resistance and index of CBF were calculated from concomitant transcranial Doppler measurements and systemic blood pressure. RESULTS: Acebutolol and perindopril significantly decreased systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure in relation to placebo. The mean value of CBF velocity increased to a comparable level after both drugs (54.9 +/- 9.1 cm/s on placebo vs 62.8 +/- 14.5 cm/s on perindopril p<0.01 and 61.4 +/- 9.2 cm/s on acebutolol, p<0.01). Also, the cerebrovascular resistance index decreased similarly after both drugs (2.26 +/- 0.35 on placebo vs 1.68 +/- 0.42 on perindopril p<0.01 and 1.7 +/- 0.36 on acebutolol p<0.01). The calculated CBF index increased significantly after each drug (25.23 +/- 7.99 on placebo vs 33.98 +/- 11.23 p<0.01 on perindopril and 30.90 +/- 8.04 on acebutolol p<0.01). However, perindopril augmented the CBF index more effectively than acebutolol (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension both acebutolol and perindopril beneficially decreased cerebrovascular resistance and increased the CBF index in comparison with placebo. The increase of CBF index was greater after perindopril than acebutolol, which suggests a more significant improvement in cerebral perfusion by perindopril. The non-invasive transcranial Doppler ultrasonography method of CBF velocity measurement may contribute to choosing optimal antihypertensive therapies and to monitor their effect.

Acebutolol↗
PubMed1998

Double-blind crossover study of the interaction between perindopril and amlodipine on blood pressure and hormones related to fluid and electrolyte balance in patients with essential hypertension.

This study was to investigate the interaction between low doses of perindopril (2 mg daily) and amlodipine (2.5 mg daily) on ambulatory blood pressure (BP), clinic BP, serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), plasma levels of renin (PRA), angiotensin II (Ang II), aldosterone, and atrial natriuretic peptide (alpha-h ANP) in subjects with essential hypertension. The study design was a parallel, two-period, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover design, with 11 subjects receiving perindopril and 10 receiving amlodipine during the run-in phase. The addition of amlodipine to perindopril had no effect on ambulatory BP, whereas the addition of perindopril to amlodipine reduced both systolic (P = 0.027) and diastolic (P = 0.049) ambulatory BP. By contrast, the opposite result was obtained for clinic BP at trough, whereby the addition of amlodipine to perindopril reduced erect systolic BP (P = 0.036) and both supine and erect diastolic BP (P = 0.038) whereas the addition of perindopril to amlodipine was without effect. The addition of perindopril to amlodipine decreased serum ACE by 72% and increased PRA two-fold, without change in plasma levels of Ang II, aldosterone or alpha-h ANP. The addition of amlodipine to perindopril increased plasma aldosterone 1.7-fold but did not affect serum ACE, PRA, Ang II, or alpha-h ANP. These interactions between perindopril and amlodipine may have been conditioned by the specific effects of the therapy first given, as well as by the different circumstances of BP measurement (ambulatory vs clinic).

Adult↗
PubMed2006

The impact of one or two missed doses on the duration of action of combined perindopril and indapamide.

To evaluate the persistence of the antihypertensive effect of perindopril 4 mg+indapamide 1.25 mg once daily for up to 72 h using the 'missed-dose' technique. Hypertensive patients were initially treated with perindopril 2 mg+indapamide 0.625 mg once daily. After 4 weeks, the 135 of 216 patients who still had a diastolic BP> or =85 mm Hg went on to receive perindopril 4 mg+indapamide 1.25 mg daily for a further 8 weeks. During either week 9 or 11, placebo was substituted for perindopril 4 mg+indapamide 1.25 mg on either one or two consecutive days to simulate BP changes, which might occur after one or two missed doses. A 24-h ambulatory BP recording was performed at baseline, after 9 or 11 weeks of perindopril+indapamide therapy and during the simulated missed doses, 24- 48 and 48-72 h after the administration of perindopril 4 mg+indapamide 1.25 mg. Significant (P<0.001) reductions in mean (+/-s.d.) 24-h ambulatory BP (mm Hg) during the first 24 h after perindopril 4 mg+indapamide 1.25 mg therapy versus baseline were noted for patients later randomized to the one missed dose (-15.9+/-10.5/-9.4+/-7.6) or two missed dose (-17.4+/-8.7/-10.3+/-5.1) sub-groups. A significant reduction in BP (P<0.001 versus baseline) was still present on the days when placebo was substituted for perindopril 4 mg+indapamide 1.25 mg with decreases in mean 24-h ambulatory BP from 24 to 48 h and 48 to 72 h after dosing being -11.9+/-10.1/-6.9+/-6.2 and -10.6+/-9.9/-5.8+/-5.7, respectively. Use of the 'missed-dose' technique has demonstrated a prolonged antihypertensive effect for perindopril 4 mg+indapamide 1.25 mg for up to 72 h, supporting the use of this combination as therapy for hypertension.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Perindopril, a new converting enzyme inhibitor: systemic and regional hemodynamics and sympathoinhibitory effects in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

The effects of a new converting enzyme inhibitor, perindopril (5 mg/kg p.o. q.d. for 8 days), on systemic and regional hemodynamics, as well as its interferences with the sympathetic nervous system at the cardiovascular level, were investigated in nonbinephrectomized and in binephrectomized spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). Perindopril abolished plasma converting enzyme activity and lowered arterial blood pressure (BP) without affecting heart rate. Cardiac index (microspheres) was not drug affected; thus, the reduction in BP was due to a decrease in total peripheral resistance which was shown to be homogenous, since all investigated vascular resistances were reduced to the same extent. In nonbinephrectomized, pithed SHRs, perindopril decreased BP and renal and hindlimb vascular resistances (pulsed Doppler). In addition, perindopril exerted a sympathoinhibitory effect as evidenced by (a) a reduction in the systemic vasopressor and regional vasoconstrictor responses to the alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonist, cirazoline, and especially to the alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist UK 14.304; and (b) a decrease in the systemic pressor and in the hindlimb vasoconstrictor responses to spinal cord stimulation. In binephrectomized, pithed SHRs, perindopril no longer decreased BP; however, whereas its sympathoinhibitory effect versus alpha-adrenoceptor agonists was abolished, that versus spinal cord stimulation persisted. These results indicate that (a) perindopril lowers BP in SHRs by a renal-dependent mechanism; (b) perindopril exerts in SHRs a sympathoinhibitory effect versus alpha-adrenoceptor agonists and spinal cord stimulation; (c) the sympathoinhibitory effect of perindopril versus alpha-adrenoceptor agonists is postjunctional and kidney dependent; and (d) the sympathoinhibitory effect of perindopril versus spinal cord stimulation is possibly prejunctional in its mechanism and does not require the presence of the kidneys.

Angiotensin I↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Persistent effects on blood pressure and renal haemodynamics following chronic angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition with perindopril.

Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats aged 4 and 16 weeks were given an acute oral dose of either Perindopril (3 mg/kg) or vehicle. Direct blood pressure (BP), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal blood flow (RBF) were measured, and renal vascular resistance (RVR) calculated. GFR and RBF were lower in vehicle-treated SHR than WKY at 4 weeks of age, but were not different at 16 weeks. Acute Perindopril increased GFR and RBF and reduced RVR in both strains at both 4 and 16 weeks. Total body sodium, sodium intake and blood pressure were measured in SHR and WKY from 1 to 28 weeks of age. Rats of both strains were treated daily between 4 and 16 weeks of age with either Perindopril (3 mg/kg per day) or vehicle. Chronic Perindopril treatment prevented the development of hypertension in the SHR. From 16 to 28 weeks of age, after stopping Perindopril, BP rose slowly in SHR, but remained lower than vehicle-treated SHR. No changes in total body sodium occurred during Perindopril treatment. GFR and RBF were measured in SHR and WKY chronically treated with either Perindopril or vehicle, 3 days or 12 weeks after stopping treatment. In WKY, GFR and RBF were not different between Perindopril-treated and untreated rats at either measurement. In SHR, GFR and RBF remained significantly higher in rats previously treated with Perindopril at both ages. These findings suggest that renal haemodynamic abnormalities may be important in the initiation of hypertension in the SHR. These renal circulatory abnormalities and the hypertension of the SHR depend, at least in part, on intact converting enzyme activity, yet appear to be independent of abnormalities of total body sodium. At a later age, hypertension seems to develop independently of renal vascular abnormalities.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed2002

Effects of low-dose and early versus late perindopril treatment on the progression of severe diabetic nephropathy in (mREN-2)27 rats.

It was previously reported that transgenic (mRen-2)27 rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus progressively develop advanced nephropathy in 12 wk. These lesions are largely prevented when the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril is administered from the time of induction of diabetes mellitus. This study aimed to determine the lowest dose of early perindopril treatment required for substantial improvement of renal function and structure and to investigate whether late intervention prevents or reverses the progression of established renal lesions. At 6 wk of age, female heterozygous Ren-2 rats were randomized to receive either streptozotocin (diabetic) or citrate buffer (control). Rats were gavaged, beginning early after the induction of diabetes mellitus or the administration of control vehicle, with 0, 0.02, 0.2, or 2 mg/kg per d perindopril for 12 wk. A separate group of diabetic Ren-2 rats received late treatment with 2 mg/kg per d perindopril throughout week 8 to week 12, when rats were hypertensive and albuminuric and exhibited increased kidney weight and glomerulosclerotic index (GSI). Among diabetic rats, early 0.02 mg/kg per d perindopril treatment reduced systolic BP, GSI, and renal collagen staining but had no effect on albuminuria or kidney hypertrophy. Early 0.2 or 2 mg/kg per d perindopril treatment further reduced systolic BP, GSI, and renal collagen staining and decreased albuminuria and kidney hypertrophy. Late intervention was as antihypertensive and antialbuminuric as early 0.2 or 2 mg/kg per d perindopril treatment but did not prevent a moderate increase in GSI. In conclusion, early treatment with 0.2 mg/kg per d perindopril was the lowest dosage to largely prevent severe diabetic nephropathy in transgenic Ren-2 rats. Late-onset perindopril treatment of diabetic rats with established nephropathy was as efficacious as early treatment with respect to various renal parameters, such as albuminuria, but was associated with moderate progression of glomerulosclerosis.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Clinical experience with perindopril in elderly hypertensive patients: a subgroup analysis of a large community trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of perindopril in a subgroup of 3010 elderly (> or =65 years) hypertensive patients, who participated in a large US general practice-based community trial. METHODS: All patients received open-label perindopril 4 mg once a day for 6 weeks. After 6 weeks the dosage was either maintained (group I) or increased to 8 mg/day (group II) based on the physician's assessment of blood pressure (BP) response. Patients were then followed for another 6 weeks for a total study duration of 12 weeks. RESULTS: Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics revealed a higher proportion of women, longer duration of hypertension and higher baseline systolic BP (SBP) among elderly than young (<65 years, n = 7332) hypertensive patients. A clinically relevant BP reduction of similar magnitude was obtained in elderly and young patients with perindopril monotherapy. At week 12, the mean reduction in BP from baseline was 18.4/8.7 mm Hg in the elderly and 17.5/11.3 mm Hg in the young. Elderly patients with hypertension not responding adequately to the 4 mg/day dosage at week 6 had a BP reduction of 6.3/3.6 mm Hg (group II). Up-titration to an 8 mg/day dosage for another 6 weeks gave an additional 8.9/3.5 mm Hg reduction resulting in a total reduction of 15.2/7.1 mm Hg from baseline. A similar magnitude of increase in response to up-titration of perindopril was seen in young patients. BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) on perindopril monotherapy was achieved in 41.4% of elderly and 51.9% of young patients. In both age groups, up-titration to an 8.0 mg/day dosage in group II patients increased BP control by approximately 5-fold at week 12 (28.2% in the elderly and 36.4% in the young). A similar increased response on BP reduction and BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) with up-titration was seen in elderly subgroups of African American and diabetic patients. The 7th Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure recommended target goal of <130/80 mm Hg was achieved with perindopril monotherapy in 15.6% of hypertensive diabetic patients. Perindopril reduced BP effectively and safely in very elderly (> or =75 years) hypertensive patients. Perindopril was well tolerated in elderly patients including high-risk groups. The incidence of cough (7-10%), the most common symptom, was similar in all age groups. The low incidence of postural hypotension (< or =0.2%) observed in the elderly and very elderly further supports the good tolerance and safety profile of the drug. Data analysis from this study suggests that community physicians, in general, are less aggressive in controlling BP in the elderly and more inclined to treat or control diastolic BP than SBP. CONCLUSION: Perindopril treatment is effective and well tolerated in elderly patients with hypertension.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

[The effect of amlodipine, nifedipine and perindopril on insulin sensitivity and blood lipid of patients with essential hypertension].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of amlodipine, nifedipine and perindopril on insulin sensitivity(IS) and blood lipid of patients with essential hypertension(EH). METHODS: 105 EH patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: amlodipine group; nifedipine group; perindopril group. Treatment period lasted for 4 weeks. Before and after treatment, IS was measured by euglycemic insulin clamp technique with glucose metabolism rate (M) as an index of IS. RESULTS: Amlodipine, nifedipine and perindopril significantly reduced blood pressure compared with that before treatment(P < 0.01). In the EH patients with decreased IS, the M value (mg.kg-1.min-1) after the use of amlodipine, nifedipine and perindopril was higer than that before treatment (amlodipine: 6.6 +/- 1.5 Vs 4.6 +/- 0.6, P < 0.01; nifedipine: 5.2 +/- 1.2 Vs 4.4 +/- 0.6, P < 0.05; perindopril: 6.8 +/- 1.6 Vs 4.4 +/- 0.6, P < 0.01). The increase of M value(mg.kg-1.min-1), nifedipine (1.2 +/- 0.9) were significantly lower than that of amlodipine(2.1 +/- 1.1) and perindopril(2.4 +/- 1.5), P < 0.01, respectively, but no significant difference was found between amlodipine and perindopril(P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Amlodipine and perindopril have beneficial effect on improving insulin sensitivity in EH patients with decreased insulin sensitivity. The effect of nifedipine on insulin sensitivity is lower than that of amlodipine and perindopril. Blood lipid is not significantly changed after short treatment.

Amlodipine↗
PubMed1992

The angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril improves survival after experimental myocardial infarction in pigs.

In this randomized, blinded study the effect of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril on electrical stability after myocardial infarction in pigs was compared to placebo. The left anterior descending artery was occluded for 45 min. Perindoprilat (0.06 mg/kg, n = 12) or saline (n = 12) was injected 15 min before reperfusion. Treatment was continued till day 13 with perindopril (12 mg, once daily) or placebo. At day 14 an electrophysiologic study was performed. The release of creatine phosphokinase did not differ significantly. During the subsequent days, seven of 12 placebo-treated pigs died (six within 24 h), whereas two of the 12 perindopril-treated pigs died (one within 24 h; p less than 0.04). Sustained ventricular tachycardia was inducible in one of five placebo-treated pigs versus three of 10 perindopril-treated survivors (NS). Late potentials had developed in one placebo-treated pig but not in pigs that received perindopril. Characteristics of infarct border zone heterogeneity (percentages of a reference electrode in viable myocardium) such as a dispersion of current thresholds (127 +/- 96 vs. 238 +/- 463% in perindopril-treated pigs, NS) and refractoriness (9.8 +/- 8.4 vs. 11.9 +/- 6.0% in perindopril-treated pigs, NS) were comparable. This treatment with perindopril significantly improved survival while electrical stability was comparable between survivors. The latter indicates that a comparable electrical stability 2 weeks after myocardial infarction is obtained in perindopril-treated pigs at a significantly higher survival rate.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed1997

Perindopril chronically inhibits angiotensin-converting enzyme in both the endothelium and adventitia of the internal mammary artery in patients with ischemic heart disease.

BACKGROUND: ACE inhibitors are widely used in treating hypertension and heart failure, but the sites and mechanisms of ACE inhibition in human blood vessels are not understood. The present study was undertaken to assess the sites and extent of in vivo inhibition of ACE by long-term perindopril treatment in different layers of the internal mammary artery in patients with ischemic heart disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixteen patients with ischemic heart disease were treated either with perindopril (4 mg/d PO) for up to 36 days before surgery (n = 9) or without the inhibitor as control subjects (n = 7). The segments of the internal mammary artery were collected for measurement of vascular free and total ACE by quantitative in vitro autoradiography with 125I-351A binding. The patients treated with perindopril had lower plasma ACE (P < .001) and plasma angiotensin (Ang) II-to-Ang I ratio (P < .05). In the internal mammary artery, free ACE was similarly inhibited by perindopril in the endothelium (P < .05) and adventitia (P < .05), and the free ACE-to-total ACE ratio, an index of ACE inhibition, was markedly decreased by perindopril in parallel in the endothelium (P < .001) and adventitia (P < .001). Moreover, plasma ACE correlated highly with vascular ACE in the endothelium (r = .85, P < .001) or adventitia (r = .78, P < .001), and mean arterial pressure correlated significantly with free ACE in the endothelium (r = .52, P < .05) or adventitia (r = .53, P < .05) and with the plasma Ang II-to-Ang I ratio (r = .53, P < .05). Light microscopic autoradiographs of 125I-351A binding revealed a marked inhibition of ACE by perindopril in both layers of the vascular wall. CONCLUSIONS: The present demonstrates that long-term administration of perindopril potently inhibits both endothelial and adventitial ACE to a comparable degree in the human internal mammary artery. These results indicate that perindopril effectively penetrates the vascular wall to inhibit ACE in the adventitia, thus providing evidence that perindopril may be beneficial in inhibiting both circulating Ang II and its local formation in the vascular wall.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Efficacy of perindopril in reduction of cardiovascular events among patients with stable coronary artery disease: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial (the EUROPA study).

BACKGROUND: Treatment with angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduces the rate of cardiovascular events among patients with left-ventricular dysfunction and those at high risk of such events. We assessed whether the ACE inhibitor perindopril reduced cardiovascular risk in a low-risk population with stable coronary heart disease and no apparent heart failure. METHODS: We recruited patients from October, 1997, to June, 2000. 13655 patients were registered with previous myocardial infarction (64%), angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease (61%), coronary revascularisation (55%), or a positive stress test only (5%). After a run-in period of 4 weeks, in which all patients received perindopril, 12218 patients were randomly assigned perindopril 8 mg once daily (n=6110), or matching placebo (n=6108). The mean follow-up was 4.2 years, and the primary endpoint was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or cardiac arrest. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Mean age of patients was 60 years (SD 9), 85% were male, 92% were taking platelet inhibitors, 62% beta blockers, and 58% lipid-lowering therapy. 603 (10%) placebo and 488 (8%) perindopril patients experienced the primary endpoint, which yields a 20% relative risk reduction (95% CI 9-29, p=0.0003) with perindopril. These benefits were consistent in all predefined subgroups and secondary endpoints. Perindopril was well tolerated. INTERPRETATION: Among patients with stable coronary heart disease without apparent heart failure, perindopril can significantly improve outcome. About 50 patients need to be treated for a period of 4 years to prevent one major cardiovascular event. Treatment with perindopril, on top of other preventive medications, should be considered in all patients with coronary heart disease.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed2004

Cardioprotective action of perindopril versus candesartan in renovascular hypertensive rats.

We investigated the effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker on cardiac hypertrophy in rats with renovascular hypertension. Renovascular hypertensive (Goldblatt) rats were surgically prepared from Wistar rats. Four weeks later, the rats showed a significant increase in blood pressure. At high doses, both the perindopril (1 mg/kg/day) and the candesartan (2 mg/kg/day) decreased the systolic pressure in these rats to the level of control Wistar rats. At low doses (perindopril 0.1 mg/kg/day and candesartan 0.1 mg/kg/day), these drugs lowered blood pressure to 85% of that in hypertensive rats. Echocardiographic and morphological studies revealed severe cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in untreated Goldblatt rats. High-dose treatment with both drugs suppressed the progression of hypertrophy and fibrosis. Also, low-dose perindopril prevented cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. In contrast, at the same levels of blood-pressure reduction, low-dose candesartan did not prevent cardiac fibrosis nor the upregulation of cardiac collagen types I and III mRNA observed in untreated Goldblatt rats. Atrial natriuretic peptide mRNA was up-regulated in untreated Goldblatt rats. These changes were significantly decreased by both doses of perindopril or the high dose of candesartan. Serum levels of angiotensin II and aldosterone were significantly higher in untreated Goldblatt rats. Both doses of perindopril inhibited activation of the renin-angiotensin system, whereas candesartan had weaker effects. In particular, serum aldosterone was 347 +/- 20 pg/ml in low-dose perindopril versus 1796 +/- 324 pg/ml in low-dose candesartan. These results suggest that there were no differences between the cardioprotective actions of perindopril and candesartan at high dosages. On the other hand, low-dose treatment with perindopril was more effective in preventing cardiac fibrosis than was low-dose treatment with candesartan, despite similar changes in blood pressure. It is possible that changes in aldosterone secretion are related to this difference.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers↗
PubMed1992

Effects of perindopril on insulin sensitivity and plasma lipid profile in hypertensive non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients.

About 40% of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM) have hypertension, which in turn may contribute to their enhanced risk for cardiovascular diseases. However, a number of antihypertensive agents tend to cause a deterioration in the control of diabetes. The present study was designed to elucidate whether treatment with perindopril (a new angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor) affects plasma lipid metabolism, glucose homeostasis, and insulin sensitivity. Ten patients with NIDDM and moderate hypertension were studied in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study encompassing 6 weeks of placebo treatment and 6 weeks of perindopril treatment given in random order. Mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 162/94 +/- 6/3 mm Hg during placebo treatment versus 157/91 +/- 5/2 mm Hg during perindopril therapy. Plasma levels of free fatty acids, triglycerides, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and total cholesterol were similar during placebo and perindopril treatment. Oral glucose tolerance tests showed similar responses of plasma glucose, serum insulin, and serum C peptide following placebo and perindopril treatment. Insulin sensitivity estimated with an intravenous insulin tolerance test (IVITT) was unchanged by perindopril therapy (KIVITT: 0.014 +/- 0.001 min-1 [placebo] versus 0.015 +/- 0.003 min-1 [perindopril], difference not significant. In conclusion, treatment with perindopril in NIDDM patients had no adverse effects on plasma lipids, glucose tolerance, or insulin sensitivity.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Perindopril effects on ambulatory blood pressure: relation to sympathetic nervous activity in subjects with diabetic nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have reported the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on 24-h blood pressure (BP) and regulation of sympathetic nervous activity in hypertensive patients with diabetic nephropathy. Using ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) devices equipped with spectral analysis of heart rate variability, we assessed the effects of perindopril on 24-h BP and autonomic nervous activity in these patients. METHODS: Thirty-four hypertensive patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetic nephropathy underwent ABPM before and after treatment with perindopril (final dose: 4.9 +/- 1.8 mg/d). Simultaneously, spectral analysis was performed to calculate the high frequency components (HF) as a marker of parasympathetic nervous activity, and the low frequency components (LF)/HF ratios as an index of the sympathovagal balance. RESULTS: Perindopril significantly and equally decreased the waking and sleeping BP in the diabetic patients. During the sleeping period, the magnitude of change of mean BP induced by perindopril correlated inversely with the sleeping/waking ratio of mean BP before treatment. However, there was no correlation between these parameters during the waking period. Perindopril decreased both waking and sleeping LF/HF ratios, although no differences in HF components were observed between before and after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetic nephropathy, perindopril decreased 24-h BP. Spectral analysis suggested that this finding was partially related to inhibited sympathetic nervous activity. During sleeping periods, the BP-lowering effect of perindopril was more pronounced in patients showing no nocturnal decrease in BP. Perindopril may be a potent antihypertensive agent to reduce increased nocturnal BP, a risk factor of target organ damage in these patients.

Adult↗