SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Pediatric”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of pantoprazole for stress-ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: A systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Stress-related mucosal damage (SRMD) is common in critically ill patients, and pharmacologic prophylaxis remains essential. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pantoprazole for stress-ulcer prophylaxis in ICU patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted per PRISMA-2020 guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL were searched for studies comparing pantoprazole with placebo in adult and pediatric ICU patients. The primary outcome was clinically important gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding; secondary outcomes included mortality, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and Clostridioides difficile infection. RESULTS: Seven RCTs (n ≈ 9127; pantoprazole = 4575; placebo = 4552) were included. Pantoprazole significantly reduced clinically important GI bleeding (RR = 0.53; 95% CI 0.29-0.94; p = 0.03) without affecting overall mortality (RR ≈ 0.99 [95% CI 0.92-1.05]; p = 0.68). Infection rates were similar between groups (VAP: RR = 0.99; p = 0.78; C. difficile: RR = 1.11; p = 0.73). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness. CONCLUSIONS: Pantoprazole effectively reduces clinically important GI bleeding without increasing infection or overall mortality.

Pantoprazole↗

PubMed2026

Comparison of immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of EVA71 vaccine in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Enterovirus 71 (EV-A71) is a principal cause of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD), potentially leading to severe neurological complications in children. Inactivated EV-A71 vaccines have been introduced. This study compares the immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of EV-A71 vaccines versus placebo in pediatric populations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Following a PROSPERO-registered protocol, RCTs involving EV-A71 in children were identified via PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Two independent reviewers performed screening, extraction, and RoB assessments (RoB 2.0). RESULTS: Five phase III RCTs involving 36,659 children were included. EV-A71 vaccination significantly increased seropositivity across follow-up periods, including early (RR 5.8), medium-term (RR 3.09), and long-term (RR 2.95) response. Seroconversion was significantly higher in the vaccinated group (pooled RR 13.04, 95% CI 2.80-60.61; p < 0.001). Geometric mean titers, analyzed using the ratio of means approach, were significantly higher in the vaccinated group during early and medium-term follow-up. Vaccine efficacy against EV-A71-associated HFMD exceeded 98% (pooled RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01-0.09; p = 0.0028; I2 = 50%). Solicited local and systemic adverse events were mild and comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Inactivated EV-A71 vaccines robust immunogenicity, high clinical efficacy, and an acceptable safety profile in children. Future studies should explore long-term protection, booster schedules, and multivalent formulations against non-EV-A71 serotypes.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and other circulating lipids in Brazil: a systematic literature review.

Accurate laboratory assessment of circulating lipids underpins cardiovascular risk stratification, yet clinical interpretation depends not only on the assays but on the formula chosen to estimate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). This review integrates the 2019-2025 evidence on laboratory methods for triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), and on the formulas estimating LDL-C, VLDL-C, and non-HDL cholesterol, to determine how these should be measured, reported, and harmonized in Brazil, where lipid thresholds are adapted from international consensus. A PRISMA 2020 systematic search (PROSPERO CRD420251241064) of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, SciELO, LILACS, Web of Science, and Embase retrieved 57,915 records; after removing 38,210 duplicates, 19,705 titles/abstracts were screened, 312 full texts assessed, and 25 sources included. Enzymatic colorimetric assays remain standard for TG, TC, and HDLC. For LDL-C, Martin/Hopkins classifies more accurately than Friedewald (89.6% vs 83.2% correct categorization in 5,051,467 patients), particularly at high TG and low LDL-C, while Sampson/NIH and modified Sampson/NIH extend reliable estimation into hypertriglyceridemia and very low LDL-C; direct measurement is reserved for TG beyond the validated range. Although the review centers on the Friedewald, Martin/Hopkins, and Sampson/NIH families that dominate guideline practice, other published equations exist and are addressed in context. In Brazil, atherogenic-lipid thresholds are risk-based decision limits rather than reference intervals; national surveys describe lipid distributions but were not designed to establish them. Analytical standardization through traceability programs, multicenter validation of formulas, and-where the distribution-based construct applies (HDLC, pediatrics)-nationally derived reference intervals are priorities for equitable cardiovascular risk assessment in Brazil.

Humans↗