The Wallaby Phototherapy System: a new approach to phototherapy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: To document the need for repeated phototherapy (as an index of significant rebound in serum bilirubin levels) following the discontinuation of intensive phototherapy and to compare the use of repeated phototherapy in infants who first received phototherapy during their birth hospitalization with the use of first-time phototherapy on readmission after infants were discharged from their birth hospitalization. DESIGN: A retrospective review of the medical records of 303 term and near-term newborns treated between January 1996 and December 1998, who received phototherapy in our well-baby nursery during their birth hospitalization (group 1, n = 158) or who had been discharged from the nursery and were readmitted for phototherapy (group 2, n = 144). All infants received intensive phototherapy but were managed by individual attending pediatricians. Rebound measurements were included if a bilirubin level was obtained between 4 and 48 hours after discontinuing phototherapy. SETTING: Newborn nursery and pediatric ward of a large community hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of infants who received repeated phototherapy and the magnitude of the bilirubin-level rebound. RESULTS: Thirteen (8.2%) of 158 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9-12.4) infants treated with phototherapy before discharge from the nursery (group 1) and only 1 (0.7%) of 144 (95% CI, 0-2.0) infants who first received phototherapy on readmission (group 2) received repeated phototherapy (P =.002). Phototherapy was discontinued when mean +/- SD total serum bilirubin levels were, 10.4 +/- 1.8 mg/dL (178 +/- 31 micromol/L) in group 1 and 12.3 +/- 1.3 mg/dL (210 +/- 22 micromol/L) in group 2. The mean +/- SD increase in the total serum bilirubin levels following rebound was 1.3 +/- 2.0 mg/dL (22 +/- 34 micromol/L) in group 1 and 0.27 +/- 1.46 mg/dL (4.6 +/- 25 micromol/L) in group 2 (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: It is not necessary to keep infants in the hospital to check for rebound. However, for infants who require phototherapy during their birth hospitalization and for those with significant hemolytic disease, we recommend obtaining a follow-up bilirubin level 24 hours after discharge. This is probably not necessary in those who are readmitted for phototherapy but, because rare instances of significant rebound have occurred in these infants, additional clinical follow-up is appropriate, particularly if phototherapy is discontinued at higher total serum bilirubin levels than used in this study.
OBJECTIVE: In 1994, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) published a practice guideline with age-specific thresholds for phototherapy for healthy term newborns with hyperbilirubinemia. The purpose of this study was to examine adherence to the guideline in a large managed care organization. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of linked computerized databases from 11 Northern California Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program hospitals. Newborn infants included were at least 37 weeks of gestation, had birth weights of at least 2500 g, and were born between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 1996. The primary outcome variable for the study was receipt of phototherapy according to the guideline. Total serum bilirubin (TSB) and infant age in hours at the time of bilirubin measurement were used to classify infants into 3 groups according to the AAP guideline: recommend phototherapy (R), consider phototherapy (C), and did not recommend phototherapy (N). Group R included infants with TSB levels of at least 15 mg/dL before 48 hours of age, at least 18 mg/dL before 72 hours, or at least 20 mg/dL after 72 hours. Group C included infants not in group R, with TSB levels of at least 12 mg/dL before 48 hours, 15 mg/dL before 72 hours, or at least 17 mg/dL after 72 hours. Group N included infants who were in neither group R nor group C and also did not have significant jaundice before 24 hours of age. Phototherapy codes from electronic databases were validated by chart review for a subset of 550 infants. RESULTS: Compared with chart review, phototherapy codes in the database were 94.4% sensitive (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89.1%-97.5%) and 100% specific (95% CI: 99.25%-100%). Among the 47 801 infants eligible, 2.3% received phototherapy. Phototherapy was administered to 54% of 1194 infants in group R (range across hospitals: 27%-77%), 16% of 2245 infants in group C (range: 5%-37%), and 0.2% of 44 362 infants in group N (range: 0.1%-0.6%). The predictors of phototherapy for group R, the group for whom phototherapy was recommended, determined by logistic regression were increasing TSB levels (odds ratio [OR]: 1.6/mg/dL; 95% CI: 1.4-1.7), reaching the AAP threshold at 24 to 47.9 hours of age compared with 48 hours or more (OR: 7.1; 95% CI: 4.3-11.9), gestational age of 37 weeks compared with 38 weeks or more (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.3), age when phototherapy was first recommended (OR: 0.7/d; 95% CI: 0.6-0.8), and facility of birth (OR: 0.2-2.7). The facility of birth was a strong predictor of phototherapy use in all groups (R, C, and N). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians provided phototherapy to only 54% of term infants with hyperbilirubinemia for whom it was recommended by the AAP. There is marked interhospital variation in phototherapy use in this large managed care system. Improved adherence to the guideline would require only a slight increase in the total rate of phototherapy use if unnecessary use for infants with lower levels of TSB were simultaneously decreased.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of fiber-optic phototherapy using the standard Ohmeda Biliblanket, a large version, double standard Biliblankets, and conventional phototherapy using daylight fluorescent lamps in full-term, healthy infants with nonhemolytic hyperbilirubinemia. METHODS: Full-term, healthy infants with nonhemolytic hyperbilirubinemia (bilirubin concentration, >255 micromol/L or 222 micromol/L at <48 hours of age) were allocated randomly to one of four modes of phototherapy: standard fiber-optic mat (Ohmeda Biliblanket), a large version, double standard Biliblankets, and conventional phototherapy. Bilirubin levels were monitored every 12 hours. Exposure was stopped when bilirubin levels were less than 185 micromol/L, the minimum duration being 24 hours. RESULTS: A total of 171 infants were studied; 42 were exposed to standard fiber-optic phototherapy, 43 to large fiber-optic phototherapy, 42 to double-fiber-optic phototherapy, and 44 to conventional phototherapy. Durations of exposure were 87.05 +/- 6.09 (SEM), 82.57 +/- 5.84, 64.85 +/- 5.43, and 62.61 +/- 3.74 hours, respectively; the 24-hour decline rates were 10.26% +/- 1.84%, 14. 50% +/- 1.53%, 21.82% +/- 1.71%, and 19.00% +/- 1.65%, respectively; the overall decline rates over the whole exposure period were 0.47% +/- 0.03%, 0.52% +/- 0.04%, 0.71% +/- 0.05%, and 0.75% +/- 0.04% per hour, respectively. The efficacy of double-fiber-optic phototherapy and conventional phototherapy was similar and significantly better than that of the large fiber-optic mat and the standard fiber-optic mat in duration, 24-hour decline rate, and overall decline rate. The large mat was slightly better than the standard-size mat with regard to 24-hour decline rate and overall decline rate, but this difference was not significant. Failure of phototherapy occurred only in the large fiber-optic mat group (3 of 43) and the standard fiber-optic mat group (4 of 42); none occurred in the other two groups, but differences not statistically significant. The nursing personnel were more comfortable with single fiber-optic phototherapy, which caused no initial disturbance to the swaddled infants as did conventional phototherapy, but found double-fiber-optic phototherapy difficult to use. CONCLUSION: For efficacy of fiber-optic phototherapy in full-term infants to be comparable to that of our conventional phototherapy, the light dose of the standard mats needs to be doubled.
Conventional phototherapy systems that simultaneously irradiate the front and the back of the baby lower the serum bilirubin level more rapidly than one-sided systems, but they are impractical. Fiberoptic phototherapy makes it easy to administer conventional phototherapy from above while the infant lies on a fiberoptic phototherapy blanket. Newborns with birth weights less than 2500 g were randomly assigned to receive either single (n = 37) or double (n = 33) phototherapy. The groups were similar in clinical and laboratory characteristics. After 18 hours of therapy the serum bilirubin concentration declined by 31 +/- 11% in the double and 16 +/- 15% in the single phototherapy group (2.9 +/- 1.1 vs 1.6 +/- 1.4 mg/dL), and the difference in the total serum bilirubin levels after 18 hours of therapy was significant (double phototherapy group 7.1 +/- 2.7 mg/dL vs single phototherapy group 8.2 +/- 2.6 mg/dL). After 18 hours of treatment the serum bilirubin level was less than the phototherapy threshold level in 26 of 37 single phototherapy patients vs 32 of 33 double phototherapy patients. Double phototherapy was well tolerated. It is concluded that this type of double phototherapy is more effective than single phototherapy in low birth weight newborns. Double phototherapy may be useful when it is necessary to reduce an elevated serum bilirubin level as rapidly as possible or when the bilirubin level is rising with single phototherapy.
BACKGROUND: Phototherapy is used to treat newborn infants with hyperbilirubinaemia. Fibreoptic phototherapy is a new mode of phototherapy which is reported to lower serum bilirubin (SBR) while minimising disruption of normal infant care. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of fibreoptic phototherapy. SEARCH STRATEGY: The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Collaboration was used including searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and discussion with experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of fibreoptic phototherapy in the management of newborn infants with hyperbilirubinaemia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Thirty-one studies were identified of which 24 met inclusion criteria. They evaluated the efficacy of fibreoptic phototherapy in a number of different clinical situations and patient populations. MAIN RESULTS: Fibreoptic phototherapy was more effective at lowering SBR than no treatment but less effective than conventional phototherapy (percentage change in SBR after 24 hours of treatment: WMD -10.7%, 95%CI -18.14, -3.26 and WMD 3.59%, 95%CI 1.27, 5.92 respectively). Fibreoptic phototherapy was equally as effective as conventional phototherapy in preterm infants and when two fibreoptic devices were used simultaneously (change in SBR after 24 hours of treatment: WMD 1.7%, 95%CI -2.65, 6.05 and change in SBR per day over whole treatment period: WMD 2.82%, 95%CI -1.84, 7.48 respectively). A combination of fibreoptic and conventional phototherapy was more effective than conventional phototherapy alone (duration of phototherapy: WMD -12.51 hr, 95%CI -16.00, -9.02, meta-analysis affected by heterogeneity). No conclusion can be made on the superiority of one fibreoptic device over another as the two studies comparing them (one favouring BiliBlanket, the other finding no difference) did not contain a common outcome measure. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Fibreoptic phototherapy has a place in the management of neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia. It is probably a safe alternative to conventional phototherapy in term infants with physiological jaundice. No trials have been identified which support the widely-held view that fibreoptic devices interfere less with infant care or impact less on parent-child bonding.
A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of fiberoptic phototherapy using the Ohmeda Billiblanket fiberoptic device, conventional phototherapy using daylight fluorescent lamps, and a combination of the two forms of phototherapy was made in 165 term healthy infants and 105 preterm infants with hyperbilirubinemia. In the term infants, the 24-hour decline rate for fiberoptic phototherapy was 9.2% +/- 1.6% (mean +/- SEM) versus 21.5% +/- 1.8% for daylight phototherapy (p < 0.01), and the overall decline rate was 0.49% +/- 0.03%/hr versus 0.70% +/- 0.04%/hr (p < 0.001). Combination phototherapy, with a 24-hour decline rate of 29.9% +/- 1.0% and an overall decline rate of 0.97% %/- 0.04%/hr, was significantly better than daylight phototherapy in both respects (p < 0.01 and < 0.01, respectively). The duration of exposure for fiberoptic phototherapy was significantly longer than that for daylight phototherapy, which in turn was significantly longer than that for combination phototherapy. Response to exposure in the preterm infants was significantly better than that in the term infants with the respective types of phototherapy. The nursing personnel unanimously felt more comfortable with fiberoptic phototherapy, which did not disturb the swaddled infants as much as conventional phototherapy. The parents also felt more reassured. Fiberoptic phototherapy proved adequate in controlling hyperbilirubinemia in preterm infants; in term infants, failures often occurred. Combination phototherapy can be recommended for severe or rapidly increasing jaundice in preterm infants, but its efficacy in term infants is uncertain.
The efficacy of double phototherapy, in the form of conventional phototherapy with special blue light plus fiberoptic phototherapy, was compared with conventional phototherapy consisting of special blue lamps alone in a relatively larger series of term newborns with significant hyperbilirubinemia. During the study period the sum of the average spectral irradiances in the double phototherapy group was significantly higher than that of the single phototherapy group (p < 0.05). Phototherapy was effective in decreasing bilirubin levels in both groups, but the response was greater in the double phototherapy group; the duration of exposure to phototherapy was significantly shorter (31.2 +/- 8.5 vs. 38.98 +/- 14.7 h, p < 0.05), and the overall bilirubin decline rate as mumol/l/h and per cent/h was significantly greater in the double phototherapy group (4.1 +/- 1.37 vs. 3.3 +/- 0.86 mumol/l/h, and 1.29 +/- 0.38 vs. 1.02 +/- 0.44 per cent/h, p < 0.05). In phototherapy treatment of term newborns with significant hyperbilirubinemia, double phototherapy provided more rapid and effective bilirubin reduction than conventional phototherapy alone due to higher spectral irradiance and larger body surface area exposed to phototherapy. The value of double phototherapy in the treatment of newborns with hemolytic hyperbilirubinemia remains to be determined.
UNLABELLED: The effect of blue-light phototherapy on cardiac output and brain and kidney perfusion was studied in 12 term infants with pulsed Doppler ultrasound. Mean (+/-SD) gestational age and birth weight were 39.0 (+/-1.6) weeks and 3438 (+/-533) g respectively. Mean (+/-SD) age of the infants at which phototherapy was initiated was 3.5 (+/-0.8) days. Left ventricular output (LVO), mean left pulmonary artery blood flow (LPA), mean blood flow velocities of the internal carotid (CBFV) and renal (RBFV) arteries were studied in all infants prior to the onset of phototherapy, 30 min, 2 h, and 12 h after initiation of phototherapy, and before and 12-24 h after discontinuation of phototherapy. LVO decreased immediately after the onset of phototherapy. However, after 12 h, LVO returned to pre-phototherapy values. LPA increased significantly after 12 h of exposure. LPA returned to pre-phototherapy values after discontinuation of phototherapy. CBFV increased, whereas RBFV decreased significantly after 2 h of exposure. After discontinuation of phototherapy CBFV as well as RBFV values returned to pre-phototherapy values. CONCLUSION: Phototherapy does affect cardiac output and organ blood flow velocity in term infants. After termination of phototherapy the effect of phototherapy disappears.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of double phototherapy and conventional phototherapy in term newborn infants with hemolytic jaundice. METHOD: Full-term infants with evidence of severe hemolysis on the peripheral blood smear, whose serum bilirubin levels were between 15-21 mg/dl were divided into 2 groups, depending on the availability of the phototherapy bed. Group 1 infants received double phototherapy consisting of conventional (single) phototherapy plus an extra light source from a phototherapy bed (Medela Billibed, Switzerland). Group 2 infants received only conventional phototherapy. Maternal and infants' blood groups and Rh, direct Coomb's test, G6PD screening test and hematocrit were determined on every infant. Phototherapy was given until the serum bilirubin level dropped to < or = 13 mg/dl. Exchange transfusion was indicated when the serum bilirubin level was > or = 21 mg/dl after phototherapy had been given for 4-6 hours. RESULTS: There were 110 infants included in this study, 62 and 48 in group 1 and 2 respectively. There was no statistical difference in terms of birth weight, sex ratio, proportion of breast feeding infants and the initial hematocrit level. However, the initial mean +/- SD of bilirubin level of group 1 infants was higher than that of group 2, (17.7 +/- 1.6 mg/dl vs 16.2 +/- 0.9 mg/dl, p < 0.001). Causes of hemolysis could be determined in 74 infants; 27 (24.5%), 39 (35.5%) and 8 (7.3%) infants had ABO incompatibility, G6PD deficiency and both ABO incompatibility and G6PD deficiency respectively. Rate of bilirubin reduction in group 1 infants was significantly faster, (3.3 +/- 2.4 mg/dl/24 h vs 2.1 +/- 1.1 mg/dl/24 h, p < 0.01). Duration of phototherapy was also shorter in group 1 infants, (45.8 +/- 29.7 hours vs 58.5 +/- 26.0 hours, p < 0.05). Four infants failed to respond to the phototherapy that was assigned. Two infants in group 2 had to be switched to receive double phototherapy because of rapid rising of serum bilirubin. One in each group needed exchange transfusion. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that double phototherapy is more efficient than conventional phototherapy in term infants with severe jaundice caused by hemolysis.
The purpose of this study is to determine the changes in skin temperature of hyperbilirubinemic term newborns under conventional and fiberoptic phototherapy. The study included a group of 41 hyperbilirubinemic, but otherwise healthy, term infants, all of appropriate size for gestational age. The study was devised to include two separate groups: group 1 of 21 infants (51.2%) received conventional phototherapy, and group 2 of 20 infants (48.8%) received fiberoptic phototherapy. In both groups the surface temperature on the forehead, abdomen, left leg and back was calculated by infrared radiation thermometer (Cyclops Compac 3, Minolta, Land, England). A "Photo-Therapie 800 Heraeus" unit (Drager, Lübeck, Germany) was used for conventional phototherapy (CPT). A "Biliblanket PT system" (Ohmeda, Louisville, KY) was used for fiberoptic phototherapy (FO-PT). In our study we did not find significant differences of skin temperature in the four areas examined in the two groups prior to phototherapy. During conventional phototherapy, mean values of skin temperature were found to be significantly higher than those found before phototherapy. During fibreoptic phototherapy no statistically significant temperature differences were found on the forehead, abdomen, leg, and back before and during phototherapy. Furthermore, a statistically significant increase in skin temperature was found during phototherapy on the forehead, abdomen, leg, and back in patients of group 1 with respect to patients of group 2. We demonstrated that fibreoptic phototherapy, in contrast to conventional phototherapy, does not induce a significant increase in skin temperature.
Ultraviolet (UV) radiation has been used for decades with great success and at a constantly increasing rate in the management of skin diseases, becoming an essential part of modern dermatologic therapy (Krutmann et al, 1999). For phototherapy, irradiation devices emitting either predominantly middlewave UV (UVB, 290-315 nm) or longwave UV (UVA, 315-400 nm) radiation are employed. In former years, patients were treated with broad-band UVB, broad-band UVA, or combination regimens. Broad-band UV phototherapy, however, is being replaced more frequently by the use of irradiation devices that allow treatment of patients' skin with selected emission spectra. Two such modalities which have their origin in European Photodermatology are 311 nm UVB phototherapy (which uses long-wave UVB radiation above 300 nm rather than broadband UVB) and high-dose UVA1 therapy (which selective employs long-wave UVA radiation above 340 nm). In Europe, 311 nm UVB phototherapy has almost replaced classical broad-band UVB phototherapy and has significantly improved therapeutic efficacy and safety of UVB phototherapy (van Welden et al, 1988; Krutmann et al, 1999). The constantly increasing use of UVA-1 phototherapy has not only improved UVA phototherapy for established indications such as atopic dermatitis (Krutmann et al, 1992a, 1998; Krutmann, 1996), but has also provided dermatologists with the opportunity to successfully treat previously untractable skin diseases, e.g., connective tissue diseases (Stege et al, 1997; Krutmann, 1997). These clinical developments have stimulated studies about the mechanisms by which UVB and UVA phototherapy work. The knowledge obtained from this work is an indispensable prerequisite to make treatment decisions on a rationale rather than an empirical basis. Modern dermatologic phototherapy has started to profit from this knowledge, and it is very likely that this development will continue and provide dermatologists with improved phototherapeutic modalities and regimens for established and new indications. This review aims to provide an overview about current concepts of the mode of action of dermatologic phototherapy. Special emphasis will be given on studies that have identified previously unrecognized immunosuppressive/anti-inflammatory principles of UV phototherapy.
Sixty newborn infants with normal birth weight suffering from uncomplicated hyperbilirubinemia were studied. They were fed human mature milk from which lactose had been eliminated, whereafter either sucrose ("sucrose milk") or lactose ("lactose milk") was added. 30 infants received ordinary phototherapy and 30 intensive phototherapy (blue double light). 15 in each group had "sucrose milk" and 15 "lactose milk". There was no significant difference between the increase in blood glucose (delta BS) by lactose tolerance tests performed before phototherapy (LTT1) and by those performed during phototherapy (LTT11), neither in infants treated with ordinary nor with intensive phototherapy. All infants had normal delta BS-LTT11, except one receiving ordinary phototherapy. There was no significant difference in gut transit time between infants having "sucrose milk" and infants having "lactose milk", neither in those treated with ordinary nor with intensive phototherapy. Gut transit time was significantly shorter in infants treated with intensive phototherapy than in infants treated with ordinary phototherapy without there being any significant difference in delta BS-LTT11. The infant with flat LTT11 may have developed lactose malabsorption during the phototherapy. Thus, lactose malabsorption is not the usual cause of the reduced gut transit time during phototherapy and must be a rare complication in phototherapy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether fiberoptic phototherapy influences the postprandial increase in mesenteric blood flow velocity similarly to conventional phototherapy in preterm infants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: With the use of Doppler color ultrasonography, blood flow velocity in the superior mesenteric artery was measured both preprandially and postprandially in 19 preterm infants during and after conventional phototherapy, and in 20 preterm infants during and after fiber-optic phototherapy. The mean arterial blood pressure/mean flow velocity ratio was calculated as an estimate of relative vascular resistance of the superior mesenteric artery. RESULTS: The study shows that conventional phototherapy blunts the postprandial mesenteric blood flow response to feeding in preterm infants. Furthermore, it shows that the postprandial increase in intestinal blood flow is not attenuated when fiber-optic phototherapy is administered, and that such postprandial increase of blood flow is significantly greater than in infants receiving conventional phototherapy. During and after fiber-optic phototherapy, a significant reduction in postprandial relative vascular resistance was found; such reduction was significantly greater than during conventional phototherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Fiber-optic phototherapy is preferable to conventional phototherapy for the treatment of hyperbilirubinemia in preterm infants because it does not affect the physiologic postprandial redistribution of blood flow from the periphery to the gastrointestinal system as does conventional phototherapy.
PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of allowing kangaroo mother care (KMC) one hour per day during the course of phototherapy using a fiberoptic phototherapy panel. SAMPLE: Thirty premature infants, 30-35 weeks gestation, <2,500 gm, who required phototherapy. Infants were randomized into three groups: (1) infants who received traditional bank or spotlight phototherapy 24 hours per day, (2) infants who received traditional phototherapy 23 hours per day and for the 24th hour lay prone on a fiberoptic phototherapy panel, and (3) infants who received traditional phototherapy 23 hours per day and for the 24th hour were given KMC with a fiberoptic phototherapy panel held against their back. OUTCOME VARIABLES: Nonparametric statistics were used for between-group comparisons on number of days of phototherapy, daily bilirubin decrement, and bilirubin profiles over the course of phototherapy. RESULTS: Groups did not differ in the number of days of phototherapy or in daily mean bilirubin decrement. The bilirubin profile for the KMC group showed a more shallow descent than did the profiles for the other groups, but a significant difference in decline was present only on day 4 of treatment (p = .05). CONCLUSION: This pilot work suggests that KMC using a fiberoptic panel during phototherapy may be safe, but further study is needed.
We report our clinical experience with phototherapy in 3802 infants; 3629 were exposed to "standard" daylight phototherapy and 173 to "high-intensity" blue-light phototherapy. High-intensity blue-light phototherapy was twice as effective as standard daylight phototherapy in decreasing bilirubin concentrations. No failures occurred with high-intensity phototherapy compared with an overall failure rate of 1.84/1000 with daylight lamps; these cases were transferred to high-intensity phototherapy with prompt response. Rebound after cessation of phototherapy was greater in those exposed to high-intensity blue light with a significantly greater number requiring a second exposure. However, the incidence was still low. No third exposure was required in any infant. Nursing of infants under high-intensity blue light was more difficult and inconvenient as was clinical monitoring. The light also caused more stress on the nursing and medical personnel. However, the infants tolerated both types of phototherapy equally well. High-intensity blue-light phototherapy would seem to be the treatment of choice for infants with rapidly increasing or very high bilirubin levels, as well as in those not responding adequately to daylight phototherapy.