Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PHIMOSIS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

[Preputioplasty in the treatment of phimosis in pediatric age. Indications and results].

AIM: Phimosis is a common condition in the pediatric age. Circumcision has been the technique of choice for the surgical correction of this condition. As an alternative to circumcision different techniques of preputioplasty have been described in the last years. The aim of this paper was to report our experience with the preputioplasty technique in the treatment of phimosis in pediatric age. METHODS: A preputioplasty is performed for phimosis correction in 109 patients aged between 4 and 16 years. Patients with a sclerotic phimosis were not treated with preputioplasty. All the patients underwent frenulotomy with dorsal preputial plasty using a single dorsal incision. Only in 3 patients a double lateral incision was necessary. Patients were operated under general anesthesia with an average time of 8 min. RESULTS: Patients were followed-up at 8 days, 30 and 90 days postoperatively. The cosmetic result has been excellent in 90% of cases and good in 10%. The functional result has been excellent in all the patients. We observed 3 cases of infection and 8 cases of edema of the prepuce. These postoperative complications were all resolved with medical therapy. No recurrences have been observed. CONCLUSIONS: Preputioplasty is a safe and rapid technique that allows to obtain excellent cosmetic and functional results. In our opinion, preputioplasty should be the first choice technique for the treatment of phimosis in pediatric and adolescent age.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

To circ or not to circ: indications, risks, and alternatives to circumcision in the pediatric population with phimosis.

Summary Although there continues to be considerable debate over the merits of circumcision, it is clear that preservation of the pediatric foreskin, even in the presence of phimosis, is a viable option. Steroid topical cream is a painless, less-complicated, and more economical alternative to circumcision for treating phimosis. Success rates are quite high, especially when patient selection is appropriate and parents are adequately instructed on application. In those children in whom topical steroid therapy has failed, there remains a variety of foreskin-preserving surgical options for treating phimosis. Compared to circumcision, these less-invasive techniques are associated with lower morbidities and cost. Furthermore, depending on the tissue-preserving technique used, satisfactory cosmesis is also achieved. Thus, those males who were not circumcised at birth now have medical and surgical options, which will decrease the likelihood of requiring circumcision at an older age. As health care providers in the United States see more and more uncircumcised male children, it is important for these children and their parents to understand the natural history of physiologic phimosis. Additionally, it is the responsibility of health care providers to present the management options available for the treatment of the persistent nonretractile foreskin and/or pathologic phimosis. These options are particularly important for those individuals whose religious, cultural, or personal preference is to retain the foreskin.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Is phimosis overdiagnosed in boys and are too many circumcisions performed in consequence?

Thirty thousand circumcisions are performed annually in England and 70% of these are upon boys under 15 years of age. In the Mersey Region some 950 boys are circumcised each year for medical indications, the commonest being 'phimosis', which accounts for 87% of cases, of whom almost one-half are under 5 years of age. Regional practice is compared with that of our Unit, where the majority of referrals had developmentally non-retractile foreskin rather than true phimosis, where circumcisions for phimosis and for balanoposthitis occurred in almost equal numbers, and where no example of true phimosis was seen in boys under 5 years of age. It appears that in the Mersey Region many boys are circumcised for development non-retractability of the prepuce rather than for true phimosis and that in consequence some two-thirds of the operations are unnecessary.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Phimosis in antiquity.

The medical term phimosis has been in use since antiquity, but in contrast to the imprecise definition of the term that is characteristic of nineteenth-century and some controversial modern medical writing. Greek and Roman medical writers imbued it with a clinically precise definition. Using the tools of the history of medicine, an analysis of the medical writings of antiquity reveals that phimosis was defined exclusively as a rare, inflammatory or cicatricial stricture of the preputial orifice consequent to a true pathological condition rather than a disease process in itself. Putative associations between phimosis and diseases such as urinary tract infections or cancer were not made in antiquity and are reflections of modern, geographically isolated social anxieties. The modern European scientific conceptualisation of phimosis, however, represents a return to the precise terminology and conservative therapeutic approach characteristic of Greek and Roman medicine.

Greece↗
PubMed1999

Medical management of phimosis in children: our experience with topical steroids.

PURPOSE: Circumcision has traditionally been regarded as primary therapy for persistent phimosis in boys. Recently groups in Europe and Australia have advocated the use of topical steroids as conservative treatment in children. We report our experience with this approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 1997 and February 1998, 25 boys with a mean age of 8.3 years who presented to our clinic with phimosis were started on a topical steroid. After counseling the family regarding treatment options we prescribed a 1-month course of 0.05% betamethasone cream applied twice daily. RESULTS: Of the 25 patients 24 completed the treatment and were evaluated. A total of 16 boys (67%) had a normal appearing foreskin that was easily retracted, while in the remaining 8 the outcome was unsuccessful and circumcision was scheduled. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the application of topical steroids is a viable alternative for treating phimosis in children. Appropriate candidates for this therapy include boys older than 3 years who have persistent phimosis and no evidence of infection.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2000

La Vega slit procedure for the treatment of phimosis.

OBJECTIVES: The surgical treatment of phimosis is usually circumcision. In countries in which circumcision is not widely practiced, this approach results in a phallus that is cosmetically unacceptable. We applied a ventral slit procedure to boys with severe phimosis and achieved outstanding results. METHODS: All patients were selected during a 1-week medical mission to La Vega in the Dominican Republic during April 1997. Eight patients presented with severe phimosis. The patient age ranged from 3 to 7 years (mean 4.4). All patients were cleared by the team pediatrician before undergoing the procedure. RESULTS: Eight patients underwent the procedure without complications. The operative time was less than 10 minutes in all instances. All had excellent postoperative cosmesis, were able to retract their foreskins, and voided without difficulty. A follow-up mission to La Vega in March 1998 yielded no complications involving this group of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike circumcision and the dorsal slit procedure, this approach yields a phallus that on initial appearance is indistinguishable from an uncircumcised phallus. The procedure is easily performed and should be considered in the treatment of phimosis whenever foreskin preservation is desired.

Child↗
PubMed1998

Phimosis as a manifestation of chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

Chronic GVHD is one of the major complications of BMT, involving a variety of organs, but rarely involving the genitourinary system. We report a patient who simultaneously developed extensive chronic GVHD and phimosis after BMT. From the clinical course and pathological findings, chronic GVHD was considered to be responsible for the phimosis. Despite intensive immunosuppressive therapy, the phimosis persisted. Phimosis is a rare complication after BMT, which may often remain neglected. Possibility of this complication should be considered in patients with chronic GVHD.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Conservative treatment of childhood phimosis with topical conjugated equine estrogen ointment.

PURPOSE: To assess the application of topical conjugated equine estrogen for the treatment of boys with phimosis. METHODS: Fifteen boys with phimosis were included in the study. Conjugated equine estrogen (Premarin) 0.1% ointment was applied on the prepuce once daily. The treatment was continued until the prepuce was fully retractable. The patient was examined each second week up to a maximum treatment of 8 weeks. Retractability and the appearance of the foreskin were graded before and after treatment. RESULTS: Thirteen of 15 boys (87%) referred with phimosis were successfully treated with conjugated equine estrogen ointment. An adverse effect of gynecomastia was seen in one boy (7%). CONCLUSION: Conjugated equine estrogen ointment application for phimosis may be an alternative to surgery.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1996

The conservative treatment of phimosis in boys.

OBJECTIVE: To further test the application of topical steroids in boys referred to a paediatric surgical practice with pathological, non-retractable foreskins diagnosed as phimosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study comprised two groups of 20 boys each (mean age 4.1 years, range 3-6) diagnosed as having phimosis; twice daily, a topical steroid (0.05% betamethasone cream) was applied on the narrowed preputial skin in the first group and a neutral cream (Vaseline) in the second (control) group. Patients were treated for 4 weeks and the retractability of the foreskin and any side-effects assessed. RESULTS: Good retraction of the foreskin was achieved in 19 patients treated with betamethasone cream and the response was unsatisfactory in 16 patients from the control group; these 16 boys and one 6-year-old boy treated with betamethasone were circumsized. There were no side-effects or problems after the application of either cream. CONCLUSION: Treatment with 0.05% betamethasone cream is a simple and safe method for the treatment of phimosis in boys older than 3 years. An early operation is necessary in cases of genuine phimosis when 1 month of treatment with topical steroids has failed. We strongly support the saying, "The fortunate foreskin of an infant boy will usually be left well alone by everyone but its owner'.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2005

An 18-month follow-up study after randomized treatment of phimosis in boys with topical steroid versus placebo.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the treatment of phimosis using topical steroid. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a follow-up study after a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. A total of 137 boys with phimosis were randomly assigned to either betamethasone treatment or placebo for 4 weeks, with application of the cream twice daily. Non-responders to treatment were offered steroid treatment for a further 4 weeks. All patients were invited to a follow-up examination after 18 months. RESULTS: The mean pre-treatment phimosis grades in the steroid and control groups were 5.08+/-0.66 and 4.97+/-0.70, respectively. At the 4-week follow-up, 49 boys (74%) in the steroid group were cured, compared to only 31 (44%) in the control group. Fourteen boys were circumcised after another 4 weeks of treatment; 43 of the remaining 57 boys (17 in the steroid group; 40 in the control group) had been cured. After a total of 92 boys took part in the 18-month follow-up study: 79 had been cured and 13 had suffered a relapse. Twenty-six patients did not took part in the follow-up investigation. No side-effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS: When treatment is necessary for phimosis, we recommend application of topical steroid as first-line treatment because surgery can then be avoided in 85% of cases. This first randomized, double-blind, follow-up study shows that the treatment effect persists for at least 18 months.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1997

A nonsurgical approach to the treatment of phimosis: local nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory ointment application.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the effectiveness of topical application of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory ointment for phimosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 52 children with phimosis was included in this study. Phimosis was graded according to severity. Of the patients 32 were given locally a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory ointment prepared in ophthalmic usage form from sterile diclofenac sodium ampules (not commercially available). The control group comprised 20 patients given sterile petrolatum ointment. Patients were seen before and after treatment, and graded according to retractibility and appearance of the foreskin. Treatment continued for 4 weeks with 3 applications daily. RESULTS: Of the 32 patients 24 responded to therapy and 8 remained unchanged or had insufficient improvement. Three controls responded to therapy and 17 did not. There were no side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory ointment application for phimosis may be an alternative to surgery and steroid application.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Outcome and recurrence in treatment of phimosis using topical betamethasone in children in Hong Kong.

AIM: To study the efficacy of treating phimosis with topical steroid, and its long-term outcome and side effects. We also looked into the effect of daily retraction and cleansing of prepuce on preventing recurrence of phimsosis. METHODS: This prospective study comprised 138 boys who were prescribed 0.05% betamethasone ointment (Diprocel) during 1 August 2001-31 July 2004. Five boys were excluded because of non-compliance. Of the remaining 133 boys, 108 were followed-up and assessed. Age ranged from 0.03 to 12.9 years (mean=3.38, SD=2.79). The number of treatment course received, short-term and long-term outcome, side effects and the effect of daily foreskin retraction were studied. RESULTS: The success rate of first treatment course was 81.5%, and 60.2% of boys remained free from phimosis upon latest assessment. The follow-up period ranged from 0.4 to 4.4 years (mean=2.45, SD=0.90). There were no side effects noted. We found a significant and linear relationship between daily foreskin retraction and sustained resolution of phimosis. CONCLUSION: Topical steroid is an effective and safe treatment for phimosis, especially when combined with a good hygiene practice of the foreskin with daily cleansing and retraction. A trial of topical steroid treatment should be offered upon considering circumcision.

Betamethasone↗
PubMed1997

Phimosis of infants and young children in Japan.

The prepuce and glans was examined in 4521 healthy infants and young children with a birthweight over 2600 g. There were 3238 infants aged 1-12 months and 1283 children aged 3 years. There is no custom of circumcision in Japan. The term phimosis implies the adhesion of the prepuce and glans, which cannot be separated by manipulation. Phimosis was found in 88.5% of infants aged 1-3 months, and the corresponding figures at the ages of 4-6 months, 7-9 months, 10-12 months and 3 years were: 74.4, 63.9, 58.0 and 35.0%, respectively. However, cases where the prepuce could be retracted by gentle manipulation were found in 3.0% of infants aged 1-3 months, 19.9% of those aged 10-12 months and increased to 38.4% of children aged 3 years, which exceeded the rate of phimosis. The complete adhesion of prepuce and glans was found in many infants, and a small space between the prepuce and glans was observed in some cases of 3-year-old boys. The smegma was notable in only 16 cases (0.5%) of infants and in 5 cases (0.4%) of the 3-year-olds. Balanopothitis was found in only one case of the 3-year-olds. It is not recommended to separate the foreskin by manipulation, which sometimes leads to bleeding or paraphimosis. And it is not necessary to surgically correct phimosis in infancy and early childhood except in the case of accompanying urological disturbance.

Age Factors↗
PubMedDate not supplied

High incidence of balanitis xerotica obliterans in boys with phimosis: prospective 10-year study.

This prospective study was designed to address the incidence and clinical and histologic characteristics of balanitis xerotica obliterans in a large random pediatric population with phimosis. We investigated 1178 boys who presented consecutively with phimosis between 1991 and 2001. All patients who underwent complete circumcision and surgical specimens were typed histologically as early, intermediate, or late forms of this disorder or as nonspecific chronic inflammation. Patients with balanitis xerotica obliterans were controlled at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, then yearly. Balanitis xerotica obliterans was found in 471 of the 1178 patients (40%), with the highest incidence in boys aged 9 to 11 years (76%). Secondary phimosis occurred in 93% of boys with balanitis xerotica obliterans and in 32% of those without the disorder. In six instances of balanitis xerotica obliterans, meatotomy and in one meatoplasty was performed, as well as circumcision. On histologic evaluation, we found 19% had early, 60% intermediate, and 21% late form of balanitis xerotica obliterans. Glanular lesions disappeared completely within 6 months in 229 out of 231 patients. Our data strongly suggest that the true incidence of childhood balanitis xerotica obliterans is higher than previously assumed. Its incidence peaks in the 9 to 11 years age group, in whom secondary phimosis was almost exclusively caused by balanitis xerotica obliterans.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed1998

Cost-effective treatment of phimosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the most cost-effective treatment for phimosis. DESIGN: The costs of three treatment strategies for treating phimosis were evaluated using a decision-tree analysis. Three therapeutic approaches were considered: circumcision, preputial plasty (the use of plastic surgical techniques to enlarge the preputial opening without removing tissue), and topical therapy with steroids and nonsteroidal antiinflammatories. Published failure and complication rates were used to calculate the cost per case. Outcome Measures. Cost in dollars to treat each case of phimosis. RESULTS: Topical steroid therapy was the most cost-effective strategy, costing between $758 and $800 per case. Preputial plasty cost between $2515 and $2580 per case. Circumcision cost between $3009 and $3241 per case. CONCLUSIONS: The most cost-effective management for treating phimosis is to initiate topical therapy. Daily external application from the tip of the foreskin to the glandis corona with betamethasone 0.05% cream for 4 to 6 weeks has been demonstrated to be very effective, resulting in a 75% savings compared with circumcision. Surgical intervention should not be considered until topical therapy has been given an adequate trial. When contemplating surgery, the lower morbidity, lower costs, and tissue preservation of preputial plasty may make it preferable.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1999

Lateral preputioplasty for phimosis.

There exists a lack of understanding of normal preputial development which is reflected in the large numbers of inappropriate referrals for circumcision. While the scarred prepuce invariably responds best to formal circumcision a more conservative approach is recommended in those symptomatic patients with non-retractile foreskins. In this study, patients referred to the out-patient department with a phimosis were assessed. Those with a phimosis and secondary preputial scarring were listed for circumcision. Those with a narrowed foreskin and a history of recurrent balanitis or local symptoms such as fissuration, thought suitable for a more conservative approach, were listed for preputioplasty. Those with a phimosis but without local symptoms were reassured and discharged. Thirty patients were referred for preputioplasty. One patient developed a post-operative wound infection which settled with oral antibiotics prescribed by his general practitioner. This left him with further preputial adhesions and he later underwent circumcision. The remaining patients reported no post-operative problems at follow-up. Cosmesis was good with high levels of patient satisfaction expressed. All had easily retractile foreskins at follow-up. Large numbers of patients might reasonably benefit from a lateral preputioplasty when presenting with a symptomatic phimosis in the absence of significant scarring of the prepuce. It avoids the needless loss of the foreskin, the importance of which is only now beginning to emerge.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Topical steroid therapy for phimosis.

INTRODUCTION: Circumcision has been the traditional treatment for phimosis. Recent reports of medical management of phimosis with topical steroids quote success rates of 67%-95%. We present our results with topical steroid therapy for treatment of phimosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 69 boys between the age of 3 and 13 years (average 7.4) who were referred to Urology clinic over a one year period (August 1999-2000) with phimosis. Boys without a distal preputial ring were excluded. A course of triamcinolone cream was prescribed and parents/patients were instructed to apply it to the preputial outlet twice daily for one month. Six weeks after treatment initiation patients were reassessed. Results were classified as follows: Full retraction (FR)-entire glans and coronal margin seen, Moderate retraction (MR)-proximal glans seen, residual preputial adhesions, Partial retraction (PR)-distal glans and meatus seen, and Failure (F)-no change. FR, MR, and PR were considered successful outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed with Splus software using the prop.test and ordinal logistic regression procedures. RESULTS: Follow-up ranged from 1-12 months, and 8 patients were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 61 boys, 82% (12 FR, 26 MR, 12 PR) were successfully managed with topical steroid (95% confidence interval: 69%-90%). Scarring on examination was observed to negatively impact outcome (92% versus 67%) and was statistically significant using ordinal logistic regression (Chi square test=4.48, p-value=0.034). Two boys with severe balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO) and two boys with buried penis and penoscrotal webbing failed treatment and required surgery. There was an association noted between older age and poorer outcome but this was not statistically significant. There were no local or systemic side effects noted. CONCLUSIONS: Local application of steroid cream to the phimotic foreskin may allow some degree of retraction and avert the need for circumcision. Although the length of follow-up is insufficient to decree ultimate success, topical steroid appears to be a safe and effective treatment for boys over three years of age with evidence of a tight preputial ring. Boys with severe BXO or buried penis and penoscrotal webbing should be considered primarily for surgery.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Acquired phimosis, or preputial sclero-atrophic lichen in children].

From 1979 to 1988, 8 cases of balanitis xerotica obliterans were histologically demonstrated in children at Nantes University Hospital. In 6 of these 8 patients, whose average age at the time of consultation was 9.4 years, the phimosis was obviously acquired or recurrent, and the prepuce was sclerous, thick, and produced a tight distal phimosis. One child coming to consultation for relapsing urinary infections at once presented with a long, tight stenosis of the anterior ureter, associated with a dilatation of the upstream ureter and a filiform stream of urine. All the children were circumcised, and the histological study of the specimen demonstrated characteristic lesions in the superficial derma. During the same operation, meatostomy was performed in two children presenting with meatal stenosis. Six of 8 children were followed up with an average time lapse of 6 months: one of them presented with an involvement of the glans penis and a moderate meatal stenosis, which disappeared spontaneously. No improvement occurred for the child presenting with an extensive stenosis of the anterior ureter, in spite of the local instillation of androgens then of corticoids, but his left kidney was dilated on sonograms. Balanitis xerotica obliterans in children is often not recognized and regarded as a common phimosis; it can be suspected because of the clinical features of the phimosis. The condition must be confirmed by the histological study of a circumcision specimen, then followed up regularly to prevent any risk of involvement of the glans, of the ureteral meatus or of the anterior ureter.

Adolescent↗