SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2,991 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Phase 1 Study Evaluating Gefurulimab Pharmacokinetics and Safety Following Delivery Via Autoinjector or Prefilled Syringe With Needle Safety Device in Healthy Adults.

PURPOSE: Gefurulimab, a novel dual-binding nanobody targeting complement component 5 (C5), is in clinical development for anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis. Gefurulimab has a low molecular weight, enabling subcutaneous (SC) self-administration by autoinjector (AI) or prefilled syringe with needle safety device (PFS-SD). We compared gefurulimab pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure and safety in healthy adults following a single SC dose administered by AI versus PFS-SD. METHODS: In this phase 1, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study (NCT06208488), healthy participants aged 18 to 65 years were stratified by weight and randomized equally to 1 of 6 combination groups of device and injection site (abdomen/thigh/upper arm). Participants received a single SC dose of gefurulimab on day 1 and were assessed throughout the 92-day evaluation period. Primary endpoints were PK parameters for each device: maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUCinf, AUClast). PK across injection sites, pharmacodynamics, safety, immunogenicity, and device performance were also assessed. FINDINGS: Overall, 175 participants were randomized: AI (n = 87), PFS-SD (n = 88). Geometric least squares mean ratios (90% CI) comparing AI/PFS-SD for Cmax, AUCinf, and AUClast were 97.6% (94.5-100.8), 99.6% (96.1-103.3), and 98.8% (95.2‒102.6), respectively. Secondary analyses found no meaningful differences in PK parameters across injection sites. Serum-free C5 concentrations over time, treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) profiles, and antidrug antibody responses were similar between cohorts. Most TEAEs were mild; none led to study discontinuation. IMPLICATIONS: SC administration of gefurulimab by AI and PFS-SD was well tolerated with comparable exposure, meeting bioequivalence criteria.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Intismeran Autogene Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab Alone in High-Risk Resected Melanoma: 5-Year Update of the Randomized Phase IIb KEYNOTE-942 Study.

Intismeran autogene (intismeran; formerly V940 or mRNA-4157) is an mRNA-based individualized neoantigen therapy. We report 5-year outcomes of intismeran plus pembrolizumab from the phase IIb KEYNOTE-942 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03897881). Eligible patients with resected stage IIIB to IV cutaneous melanoma were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive nine doses of intramuscular intismeran 1 mg once every 3 weeks plus 18 doses of intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks or 18 doses of intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival (RFS); secondary end points included distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and safety. Five-year analyses were descriptive. Among 157 randomly assigned patients (intismeran plus pembrolizumab, n = 107; pembrolizumab, n = 50), the median planned follow-up at data cutoff (December 15, 2025) was 60.3 (range, 50.5-76.4) months. Intismeran plus pembrolizumab continued to prolong RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.510 [95% CI, 0.294 to 0.887) and DMFS (HR, 0.411 [95% CI, 0.200 to 0.843]), with a favorable trend in overall survival (HR, 0.471 [95% CI, 0.165 to 1.345]) versus pembrolizumab. Safety profile continued to be manageable, with no new safety signals. Intismeran plus pembrolizumab was associated with increased T-cell receptor clonality and novel clonotypes versus pembrolizumab; greater novel clone expansion was observed in patients without versus with recurrence in the combination arm. After a 5-year follow-up, intismeran plus pembrolizumab demonstrated sustained, durable treatment benefits versus pembrolizumab alone in resected high-risk melanoma.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A Phase II Feasibility Study Combining Pembrolizumab and Metformin in Patients with Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer.

PURPOSE: Survival for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) remains low with <20% immunotherapy response. Metformin increases tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T and natural killer (NK) cells, which harbor PD-1. In this phase II clinical trial (NCT04414540), we combined metformin and pembrolizumab to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) in R/M HNSCC and assess NK-cell activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 into two arms: (i) metformin extended-release (ER) dose escalation to 2,000 mg over 14 days followed by combination with pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks or (ii) pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks followed by combination with metformin ER 2,000 mg daily. The primary endpoint was ORR per RECIST 1.1. Nineteen evaluable patients were planned to estimate the proportion of approximately 32% ORR. Safety was evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. The distribution, activation, and cytotoxic function of NK cells were analyzed via flow cytometry. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled; 76% were male, 52% were smokers, and the median age was 64 years. Ten patients had oropharyngeal tumors, of which nine were p16+. Eighteen patients were evaluable for response, including four complete and five partial responses for an ORR of 50% [95% confidence interval (29-71)]. Combination therapy was well tolerated with no unexpected adverse events (AE). Five grade 3 AEs occurred: nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, and weight loss. Metformin led to increased peripheral NK-cell maturation and cytotoxic ability. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of metformin and pembrolizumab was well tolerated with mild gastrointestinal AEs and promising activity, warranting further investigation in a randomized trial.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Penpulimab and Gemcitabine With or Without Anlotinib in Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Phase 2 Study.

This prospective exploratory phase 2 study employed a three-cohort, two-phase design to evaluate the potential of anlotinib as a substitute for cisplatin in gemcitabine-penpulimab combinations for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who were previously treated with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy. Patients enrolled in the study were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio during the lead-in phase to one of three treatment arms: gemcitabine, cisplatin, penpulimab, and anlotinib (GP-PA, n = 8); gemcitabine, cisplatin, and penpulimab (GP-P, n = 6); or gemcitabine, penpulimab, and anlotinib (GAP, n = 6). The expansion phase enriched the optimal cohort, with stratification based on PD-L1 expression. The primary endpoints were safety and objective response rate (ORR), while the secondary endpoints included duration of response, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). In the lead-in phase, grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 87.5% (GP-PA), 100% (GP-P), and 66.7% (GAP) patients, predominantly hematologic toxicities. ORR/DCR were 62.5%/87.5% (GP-PA), 83.3%/100% (GP-P), and 100%/100% (GAP). At median 20.2-month follow-up, median PFS/OS were 4.1/18.4 months for GP-PA and not reached for GP-P/GAP. In the expansion phase, a total of 14 patients received GAP, with an ORR of 93.3% and grade ≥ 3 TEAEs in 71.4% of patients. At data cut-off point, the median PFS had not been reached, and the 12-month PFS and OS rates were 53.8% and 78.6%, respectively. The GAP regimen demonstrated a favorable safety and efficacy profile, compared to the GP-PA and GP-P regimens in patients with metastatic NPC. These findings suggest that substituting cisplatin with anlotinib may offer a viable therapeutic strategy for this patient population.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Durvalumab and tremelimumab, with or without lenvatinib, combined with transarterial chemoembolisation in participants with embolisation-eligible hepatocellular carcinoma (EMERALD-3): a global, randomised, open-label, sponsor-blinded, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), a standard treatment for embolisation-eligible hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), induces tumour immune responses. Single tremelimumab regular interval durvalumab (STRIDE) is a standard treatment in advanced HCC. In this phase 3 trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of STRIDE, with or without lenvatinib, plus TACE, in participants with embolisation-eligible HCC. METHODS: EMERALD-3 is a phase 3, randomised, open-label, sponsor-blinded study, conducted at 177 medical sites in 21 countries. Eligible participants were 18 years or older (aged ≥21 years in Egypt or Singapore) at screening and had confirmed HCC (by imaging or histopathologically from biopsy specimen, surgery, or both) not amenable to curative surgery, curative ablation, or transplantation but amenable to TACE. Participants had Child-Pugh class A liver function, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and at least one measurable target intrahepatic lesion per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE, STRIDE plus TACE, or TACE until each group reached its preplanned enrolment target of 175 participants. After the STRIDE plus TACE group reached its enrolment target, randomisation was adjusted to continue in a 1:1 ratio between the STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE group and TACE group until approximately 275 participants were enrolled in each of these two groups. Randomisation used a centrally assigned interactive response technology system, stratified by region, baseline tumour burden, and previous palliative embolisation. In the STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE group, on the first day, participants were given 300 mg tremelimumab intravenously, followed by 1500 mg durvalumab plus oral lenvatinib (8 mg for <60 kg bodyweight or 12 mg for ≥60 kg bodyweight); participants then received 1500 mg durvalumab every 4 weeks plus once-daily lenvatinib for up to 36 cycles. In the STRIDE plus TACE group, participants were given 300 mg tremelimumab and 1500 mg durvalumab intravenously on the first day, followed by 1500 mg durvalumab every 4 weeks. The technique and number of TACE procedures were at the investigators' discretion, with the first procedure administered at least 7 days after the first dose of durvalumab in the two investigation treatment groups and within 7 days of random allocation in the TACE group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE versus TACE. Key secondary endpoints were overall survival for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE versus TACE and progression-free survival and overall survival for STRIDE plus TACE versus TACE. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05301842), with enrolment completed. FINDINGS: From March 28, 2022, to Nov 20, 2024, 1124 participants were screened. The full analysis set comprised 760 participants, who were randomly allocated to STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE (n=293), STRIDE plus TACE (n=175), or TACE (n=292). 633 (83%) participants were male and 127 (17%) were female; 548 (72%) were Asian. At the first data cutoff (Sept 2, 2025); the overall median follow-up for progression-free survival was 10·0 months (IQR 4·6-17·2); median follow-up for progression-free survival was 11·0 months (IQR 4·8-18·4) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE and 8·3 months (4·1-15·5) for TACE. Median progression-free survival was 13·0 months (95% CI 12·2-16·7) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE versus 9·8 months (8·0-11·4) for TACE (HR 0·70 [95% CI 0·57-0·86]; p=0·0007). At the second data cutoff (Feb 23, 2026) and a median follow-up for overall survival of 24·6 months (IQR 16·5-31·5) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE and 22·9 months (14·9-30·2) for TACE, median overall survival was 39·5 months (95% CI 34·1-not reached) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE and 34·7 months (28·8-not reached) for TACE (HR 0·84 [95% CI 0·65-1·09]; p=0·18). At this data cutoff, median progression-free survival was 12·9 months (95% CI 10·2-15·9) for STRIDE plus TACE and 8·1 months (6·5-10·2) for the first 175 participants randomised to TACE (HR 0·71 [95% CI 0·56-0·91]), with median follow-up of 10·3 months (IQR 4·6-23·7) for STRIDE plus TACE and 7·7 months (3·0-18·5) for the first 175 participants randomly allocated to TACE. The most common adverse events of maximum grade 3 or 4 were hypertension (34 [12%] of 287) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE, post-embolisation syndrome and anaemia (ten [6%] of 175 each) for STRIDE plus TACE, and post-embolisation (17 [6%] of 290) for TACE. 184 (64%) participants receiving STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE, 89 (51%) receiving STRIDE plus TACE, and 68 (23%) receiving TACE had serious adverse events. Treatment-related adverse events with an outcome of death during the treatment-emergent period occurred in seven (2%) of 287 participants who received STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE (two for myocarditis; and one each for hepatic failure, haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, septic shock, cardiac failure, and unknown cause), none of 175 participants who received STRIDE plus TACE, and two (1%) of 290 participants who received TACE (one each for acute myocardial infarction and unknown cause). INTERPRETATION: STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE showed a statistically significant progression-free survival improvement versus TACE. These findings support a STRIDE-based regimen as a potential new treatment option for people with embolisation-eligible HCC; additional follow-up is being conducted for final analysis of overall survival across treatment groups. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Magrolimab Plus Azacitidine Versus Placebo Plus Azacitidine in Patients With Untreated Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: The Phase III ENHANCE Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the cluster of differentiation 47-targeted antibody magrolimab plus azacitidine (Magro/Aza) versus azacitidine alone in treatment-naïve patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in the phase III ENHANCE study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04313881). METHODS: Based on the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System, patients with intermediate- to very-high-risk MDS were randomly assigned to receive Magro (1 mg/kg on days [D]1 and 4; 15 mg/kg on D8; 30 mg/kg on D11 and D15, and then once per week for five doses, followed by 30 mg/kg maintenance doses once every 2 weeks)/Aza (75 mg/m2 daily on D1-7 or on D1-5 and 8-9 in 28-day cycles) or matched placebo plus azacitidine (Placebo/Aza). Dual primary end points were complete remission (CR) rate (per 2006 International Working Group criteria) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: At final analysis, 539 patients were randomly assigned to Magro/Aza (n = 268) or Placebo/Aza (n = 271) arms. Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between treatment arms. In the Magro/Aza versus Placebo/Aza arms, the CR rate was 21.3% versus 23.6% (odds ratio, 0.876 [95% CI, 0.585 to 1.312]; P = .5218), and median OS was 15.9 versus 18.6 months (hazard ratio, 1.203 [95% CI, 0.947 to 1.528]; P = .1299). Magro/Aza had a higher incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs; 92.8% v 79.2%), AE-associated study drug discontinuations (24.0% v 12.1%), serious AEs (71.9% v 51.5%), and fatal AEs (15.2% v 9.8%) versus Placebo/Aza. CONCLUSION: ENHANCE did not meet the primary end points of CR rate and OS, and showed more frequent severe AEs in patients treated in the Magro/Aza arm.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of fruquintinib versus ramucirumab in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Aim: Fruquintinib (Fruq), a selective VEGFR 1/2/3 inhibitor, showed a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in the Phase III FRUTIGA trial for advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Ramucirumab (RAM), an anti-VEGFR2 antibody, demonstrated efficacy in the RAINBOW-Asia trial. This anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) evaluated Fruq plus paclitaxel versus RAM plus paclitaxel as second-line therapy for G/GEJ adenocarcinoma in the absence of head-to-head trials. Materials & methods: Data from individual patients in the FRUTIGA study (N = 703) and aggregated data from the RAINBOW-Asia study (N = 440) were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were balanced using entropy balancing. The placebo plus paclitaxel (PBO + PTX) groups served as the common comparators. The primary outcome was PFS; secondary outcomes included overall survival, objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were also compared as an exploratory outcome using an adjusted indirect risk difference. Sensitivity analyses included restricted mean survival time and simulated treatment comparison. Results: After weighting (effective sample size = 564), baseline covariates were balanced. The anchored MAIC demonstrated that Fruq + PTX significantly improved PFS compared with RAM + PTX (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51-0.96; p = 0.0280), corresponding to a 30% reduction in progression risk, with a significant restricted mean survival time benefit of 1.18 months at 20 months (95% CI: 0.08-2.27; p = 0.024). Fruq achieved significantly higher ORR (OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.16-2.68; p = 0.008) and DCR (OR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.33-2.83; p < 0.001). Overall survival was similar (0.97; 95% CI: 0.73-1.30; p = 0.8640). Subgroup analyses showed PFS benefits with Fruq in patients with ECOG PS 1, peritoneal metastases and two or fewer metastatic sites. In sensitivity analysis, the simulated treatment comparison also suggested a PFS benefit for Fruq + PTX (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.32-0.50; p < 0.0001). For any-grade TEAEs, the indirect comparison showed higher adjusted relative incidences of increased bilirubin with Fruq + PTX than with RAM + PTX (RD: 12.3%; 95% CI: 2.3-22.4%, p < 0.05) and of hypokalemia (RD: 9.0%; 95% CI: 1.5-16.4%, p < 0.05). For grade ≥3 TEAEs, the adjusted relative incidence of decreased body weight was higher with Fruq + PTX than with RAM + PTX (RD: 2.9%; 95% CI: 0.6-5.2%, p < 0.05). The adjusted relative incidences of increased AST, ALT and hypocalcemia were numerically lower in the fruquintinib group than in the RAM group. Conclusion: This MAIC indicates that Fruq + PTX may be more effective than RAM + PTX in second-line advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma, with potentially improved PFS, ORR and DCR, and similar overall survival. Safety analyses suggested generally comparable safety profiles across the two regimens. Fruq + PTX remains a valuable treatment option, offering important comparative evidence for clinical and health technology assessment decisions. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT07144995.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Diagnostic accuracy of nuclear STAT6 immunohistochemistry for solitary fibrous tumour: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nuclear STAT6 immunohistochemistry is the diagnostic surrogate for the NAB2::STAT6 fusion of solitary fibrous tumour (SFT); its sensitivity is established, but specificity varies for unexamined reasons. This review quantified pooled accuracy and tested whether antibody clone and nuclear threshold govern specificity. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched to 29 June 2026 for studies reporting nuclear STAT6 immunohistochemistry against a reference standard (NAB2::STAT6 confirmation and/or expert consensus) in SFT and comparators, with extractable two-by-two data. Two reviewers screened, extracted data and applied QUADAS-2. A bivariate generalised linear mixed model gave summary sensitivity and specificity, and exploratory subgroup analysis and meta-regression tested antibody clone, anatomical site and reference-standard type. Twenty-three studies (1216 SFT and 4715 comparators) were included. Summary sensitivity was 98.7% (95% confidence interval 96.7-99.5) and specificity 99.1% (97.8-99.6); the diagnostic odds ratio was approximately 8656. The monoclonal YE361 subgroup (8 studies) reached specificity 99.9% (99.3-100), with one false positive among 861 comparators, versus 98.1% (96.0-99.1) for polyclonal and other antibodies. False positives concentrated in dedifferentiated liposarcoma and prostatic stromal tumours. Estimates were stable after removing studies at higher risk of bias (98.9%/99.1%) and on leave-one-out analysis; the Deeks test was non-significant (p = 0.08). Nuclear STAT6 immunohistochemistry is therefore highly sensitive and specific for SFT, and the residual specificity loss is structured and largely avoidable: the monoclonal YE361 read at a strict nuclear threshold is preferred, with MDM2 and CDK4 applied to exclude dedifferentiated liposarcoma when nuclear STAT6 is unexpectedly positive.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Manual, digital, and AI tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte scoring: a secondary analysis of the APHINITY randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Stromal tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are prognostic in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, but their role in the context of dual HER2 blockade remains undefined. We evaluated manual, digital, and artificial intelligence (AI)-based sTIL quantification, together with AI-derived spatial metrics, for prognostic and treatment-benefit stratification using tumour samples from the phase 3 APHINITY trial. METHODS: In the APHINITY trial, 4805 patients were randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy plus trastuzumab with pertuzumab or chemotherapy plus trastuzumab with placebo. Median follow-up was 74·1 months (IQR 68·3-75·4). We analysed 4262 haematoxylin and eosin-stained images using manual assessment, an automated digital approach, AI-based lymphocyte quantification (AI percentage lymphocytes), and two AI-derived spatial features (AI-TIL and immune hotspot). Interobserver reproducibility was assessed in 262 randomly chosen tumour samples scored independently by five pathologists. Multivariable Cox models were used to assess associations between TIL levels and invasive disease-free survival (primary outcome in APHINITY), distant recurrence-free interval, and overall survival. The heterogeneity of pertuzumab benefit was evaluated using subgroup analyses, subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot analyses, and nested Cox models with treatment-by-biomarker interaction terms. FINDINGS: Manual scoring showed high interobserver reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient 0·84 [95% CI 0·79-0·88]). Concordance between manual and automated methods was modest. AI-based scoring (AI percentage lymphocytes) reclassified 120 (11·6%) of 1035 node-positive tumours from immune-low (by manual scoring) to immune-high; this subgroup of patients showed greater separation of 5-year invasive disease-free survival curves between pertuzumab and placebo groups compared with patients whose tumours were concordantly classified as immune-low by both manual and AI-based approaches. Higher levels of TILs were associated with improved invasive disease-free survival for all sTIL measurement approaches and spatial measurements (hazard ratios [HRs] 0·41-0·93). Pertuzumab was associated with improved invasive disease-free survival at higher sTIL levels across all measurement approaches (HRs 0·36-0·48), but was not associated with higher values of spatial measures. The largest 6-year absolute improvements with pertuzumab were observed in patients with node-positive disease whose tumours scored in the highest level of immune infiltration of manual sTIL scoring (≥70·0%; mean absolute improvement 12·1 percentage points [SD 2·8]). In nested prognostic and predictive models, AI-based immune hotspot scores provided the most consistent additional information when combined with any sTIL measurement (all p<0·010). INTERPRETATION: Standardised manual sTIL scoring was reproducible, and digital and AI-based methods showed consistent prognostic stratification and potential for treatment-benefit stratification despite only modest correlation between platforms. AI spatial metrics provided complementary information beyond sTIL density and could support more scalable immune assessment. Future studies are needed to validate these approaches in independent cohorts and to clarify their clinical utility for stratifying contemporary HER2-directed therapies. FUNDING: None.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Ivonescimab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (HARMONi): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Ivonescimab has shown clinical efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ivonescimab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC whose disease progressed after third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. METHODS: HARMONi is a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial done at 114 cancer centres and hospitals across Asia, Europe, and North America. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years (upper limit: 75 years in Asia) with stage IIIB/IIIC or IV non-squamous EGFR-mutated NSCLC, disease progression after treatment with a third-generation EGFR-TKI, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a centralised interactive voice response system or interactive web response system to receive ivonescimab (20 mg/kg) or placebo plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and carboplatin (target area under the curve 5 mg/mL per min) intravenously every 3 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by brain metastases status at enrolment and geographical region. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival by blinded independent radiology review committee and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of trial treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06396065), has completed enrolment, and is ongoing for treatment and follow-up. FINDINGS: From Jan 25, 2022, to Oct 1, 2024, 660 individuals were screened for eligibility; of these, 438 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive ivonescimab plus chemotherapy or placebo plus chemotherapy (219 per group). Of enrolled patients, 257 (59%) were female and 181 (41%) were male; 306 (70%) reported race as Asian, and 105 (24%) as White. At a median follow-up of 22·3 months (95% CI 21·5-23·0), 275 progression or death events had occurred in 345 patients (129 events among 172 patients in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group and 146 events among 173 patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group). Median progression-free survival was 6·8 months (95% CI 5·7-7·1) in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group versus 4·4 months (4·1-5·5) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·52; 95% CI 0·41-0·66; p<0·0001). At a median follow-up of 29·7 months (95% CI 27·7-31·0), 262 deaths occurred in 438 patients (122 in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group and 140 in the placebo plus chemotherapy group). Median overall survival was 16·8 months (14·3-19·0) in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group versus 14·0 months (12·8-15·7) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (HR 0·79; 0·62-1·01). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy versus the placebo plus chemotherapy group were decreased neutrophil count (42 [19%] of 218 vs 36 [17%] of 218), decreased white blood cell count (28 [13%] vs 24 [11%]), decreased platelet count (27 [12%] vs 14 [6%]), and anaemia (22 [10%] vs 27 [12%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 61 (28%) patients in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group and 33 (15%) patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four patients (disease progression, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and hepatic failure, each in one patient; gastrointestinal haemorrhage and pulmonary embolism in one patient) in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group and five patients (pneumonitis, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, cognitive disorder, and embolic stroke, each in one patient) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. INTERPRETATION: Ivonescimab plus chemotherapy showed a clinically meaningful and statistically significant progression-free survival benefit in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC after progression on EGFR-TKI therapy. The clinical benefit and lack of new safety signals of ivonescimab with chemotherapy support the potential for the combination as a new treatment option in this patient population. FUNDING: Summit Therapeutics.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Pharmacological therapies for the prevention of fractures in men.

RATIONALE: Pharmacological therapies for fracture prevention usually target osteoporosis, a skeletal disorder characterised by compromised bone mass or quality (or both). As most participants in osteoporosis trials are women, a review of pharmacological therapies for fracture prevention in men was warranted. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefits and harms of bisphosphonates, parathyroid (PTH) or parathyroid-related protein (PTHrP) analogues, denosumab, and romosozumab therapy for the prevention of fractures in men. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP) until 14 October 2025, with no restrictions on date or language of publication. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials that compared bisphosphonates, PTH or PTHrP analogues, denosumab, or romosozumab (alone or with calcium or vitamin D, or both) with placebo, other drugs, or non-pharmacological therapies in men aged 50 years or older. Our primary comparison was bisphosphonates versus placebo. OUTCOMES: Critical outcomes were incidence of hip fractures, symptomatic vertebral fractures, other (not hip or vertebral) fractures, disability, participants with adverse events, study withdrawals due to adverse events, and participants with serious adverse events. Our primary time point was the final time point reported in the trials. RISK OF BIAS: We used Cochrane's RoB 2 tool to assess risk of bias. SYNTHESIS METHODS: We used a random-effects model for meta-analysis employing the Mantel-Haenszel approach, and the DerSimonian and Laird method to estimate between-trial variance. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE. INCLUDED STUDIES: Seventeen trials (4132 participants) met our inclusion criteria. The average age of participants ranged from 52 to 73 years. Twelve trials used a placebo comparator versus bisphosphonate (7 trials, 2548 participants), PTH or PTHrP analogues (4 trials, 569 participants), denosumab (1 trial, 240 participants), and romosozumab (1 trial, 244 participants). For the other planned comparisons, a bisphosphonate was compared to vitamin D/vitamin D analogues (2 trials, 434 participants), to calcitonin (1 trial, 32 participants), to PTH or PTHrP analogues (1 trial, 19 participants), or to another bisphosphonate (1 trial, 301 participants), and one trial compared a bisphosphonate plus calcium to calcium tablets alone (46 participants). SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS: Placebo-controlled trials were largely susceptible to bias in selection of the reported result (83%), while most trials without a placebo control were also susceptible to bias arising from the randomisation process (100%) and in measurement of the outcome (80%). We are very uncertain about the effect of bisphosphonates on the incidence of hip fractures, symptomatic vertebral fractures, or other (non-hip non-vertebral) fractures compared to placebo at the final follow-up (up to two years). We downgraded the certainty of evidence once for risk of bias, twice for imprecision (very low event rates), and once for suspected publication bias. The certainty of evidence for incidence of other fractures was further downgraded for indirectness, as it was unclear if hip fractures were also included in the outcome. At up to two years, 2/875 participants (2 per 1000) in the bisphosphonate group reported hip fractures compared with 2/760 (3 per 1000) in the placebo group (risk ratio (RR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06 to 8.51; I² = 36%; 4 trials, 1635 participants); 5/1021 (4/1000) participants in the bisphosphonate group had a symptomatic vertebral fracture compared to 7/855 (8/1000) participants in the placebo group (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.74; I² = 0%; 5 trials, 1876 participants); 25/1130 participants (16/1000) in the bisphosphonate group reported other (non-hip non-vertebral) fractures compared to 19/913 participants (21/1000) in the placebo group (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.45; I² = 0%; 6 trials, 2043 participants). Bisphosphonates probably do not increase the risk of adverse events: 1024/1374 participants (746/1000) receiving bisphosphonates reported adverse events compared to 826/1174 participants (704/1000) receiving placebo (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.19; I² = 75%; 7 trials, 2548 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or serious adverse events: 329/1329 participants (272/1000) receiving bisphosphonate reported serious adverse events compared to 323/1128 participants (286/1000) receiving placebo (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.08; I² = 0%; 6 trials, 2457 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence once due to potential bias for adverse events and serious adverse events. We are very uncertain if bisphosphonates result in more withdrawals due to adverse events: 41/1374 participants (25/1000) in the bisphosphonate group withdrew due to adverse events compared with 43/1174 participants (37/1000) in the placebo group (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.18; I² = 37%; 7 trials, 2548 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence once for risk of bias, once for indirectness, and once for imprecision. No trial reported disability. We are very uncertain about the effects of PTH or PTHrP analogues, denosumab, or romosozumab compared to placebo on fracture outcomes. We are very uncertain about the effects of PTH/PTHrP analogues on total adverse events, withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. Denosumab may not increase the risk of adverse events or serious adverse events compared to placebo, while the evidence for withdrawals due to adverse events is very uncertain. Romosozumab probably does not increase the risk of adverse events and may not increase the risk of serious adverse events or result in more withdrawals due to adverse events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We are very uncertain about the effects of bisphosphonates compared to placebo on the incidence of hip fractures, symptomatic vertebral fractures, or other (non-hip non-vertebral) fractures in men at up to two years of use. Bisphosphonates probably do not increase the risk of adverse events or serious adverse events, and we are very uncertain if they result in more withdrawals due to adverse events. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for indirectness, imprecision (low event rate), and serious risk of bias in selection of the reported result, as it was unclear if all studies fully reported every fracture. We found similar results for PTH or PTHrP analogues, denosumab, or romosozumab versus placebo. Larger, longer placebo-controlled studies are needed to determine whether pharmacological therapies are beneficial for reducing fractures in men. FUNDING: This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding. REGISTRATION: Protocol (2021): https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014707.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Histoplasmosis in children: emerging insights and evolving guidelines.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides an update on the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management recommendations incorporating recommendations from recent publications including the Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines for the management of pulmonary and disseminated histoplasmosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Updates to the epidemiology of histoplasmosis indicate a broader geographic range than historically defined. Updated guidelines do not recommend routine treatment for asymptomatic, mild and moderate pulmonary histoplasmosis although itraconazole can be offered for immunocompromised children or for prolonged or worsening symptoms. Liposomal amphotericin B is recommended as initial treatment for severe histoplasmosis syndromes (severe pulmonary and disseminated histoplasmosis). Fibrosing mediastinitis, a late complication of histoplasmosis is treated with stenting of vessels and bronchi. Recent studies demonstrate that rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) may stop progression or lead to regression of progressive fibrosis. SUMMARY: Histoplasmosis has manifold manifestations, many of which are self-limited and do not require treatment. Severe histoplasmosis and its complications should be treated with liposomal amphotericin B followed by itraconazole. Clinical trials are needed to assess the efficacy of rituximab for the treatment of fibrosing mediastinitis.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comparative safety of lipid-lowering drugs alone or in combination: insights from a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although the safety profile of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) is known, there are no comprehensive comparative assessments. We aimed to compare the risk of muscle-related events, diabetes, liver dysfunction, and cognitive disorders among LLTs through a network meta-analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Databases were searched from inception to May 2025. Eligible studies included adult patients, using statins, ezetimibe, PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9mAbs), inclisiran, bempedoic acid, or their combinations as intervention, reporting the information about any of the selected adverse events, a total sample size of ≥200 subjects, and had ≥1 month of intervention. Pooled estimates were assessed by fixed effects model within a frequentist setting. Pooled relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence interval were estimated. A total of 303,397 subjects from 153 RCTs were included. Bempedoic acid ranked the lowest risk of myalgia (vs PCSK9mAbs, RR 0.80 [0.69, 0.93]). PCSK9mAbs were associated with lower incidence of creatine kinase (CK) elevation, diabetes, and liver dysfunction comparing to statins (statins vs PCSK9mAbs, RR 1.44 [1.14, 1.81], RR 1.13 [1.05, 1.22], and RR 1.38 [1.17, 1.62], respectively). In terms of muscle-related events and cognitive disorders, no significant risk differences were found among treatments and their combinations. CONCLUSIONS: PCSK9mAbs appear to have a more favourable safety profile regarding the risk of CK elevation, diabetes, and liver dysfunction. Bempedoic acid seem to be a better choice for subjects with high risk of myalgia. This information can be valuable when selecting therapy for specific patient subgroups at higher risk of certain adverse events.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Maternal disease control and pregnancy outcomes with anti-CD20 therapy versus natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Management of multiple sclerosis (MS) during pregnancy requires balancing maternal disease control with fetal safety. Among high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and natalizumab are commonly used in women with active disease, yet their comparative effectiveness and safety during pregnancy remain incompletely defined. This systematic review evaluated maternal disease activity and pregnancy-related outcomes associated with anti-CD20 exposure compared with natalizumab in pregnant women with MS. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception through February 2026. Eligible studies included pregnant women with MS exposed to anti-CD20 before or during pregnancy and reporting maternal disease activity compared to natalizumab. RESULTS: Seven studies were included, comprising six observational cohort studies and one pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis. Across studies, anti-CD20 exposure was consistently associated with lower relapse activity than natalizumab, particularly in the postpartum period. Anti-CD20 strategies were also associated with markedly lower postpartum MRI activity and more favorable disability-related outcomes where reported. Meta-analysis of three studies demonstrated a significant reduction in postpartum MRI activity with anti-CD20 therapy compared with natalizumab (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.24; I² = 0%). No clear increase in major congenital anomalies was identified, although some data suggested higher odds of small for gestational age and maternal antibiotic use with anti-CD20 exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-CD20 therapy was associated with lower maternal disease activity than natalizumab during pregnancy, especially for relapse prevention and postpartum MRI suppression. However, evidence regarding fetal and neonatal safety remains limited, warranting cautious individualized treatment decisions and further comparative research.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Antibody-drug conjugates against multidrug-resistant cancers: Biomarker-guided patient selection, payload engineering, linker chemistry, and bystander effects.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are one of the most significant advancements in modern cancer therapeutics. Combining the target selectivity of monoclonal antibodies with the cytotoxic potential of payloads, ADCs effectively kill cancer cells and offer hope to patients with even refractory cancer types. Beyond simply increasing the number of therapeutic options available for cancer patients, ADCs have become a powerful frontline agent in overcoming multidrug resistance (MDR). As one of the most challenging obstacles to effective cancer care, MDR is mediated by ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter-mediated drug efflux, target-based mutations, and dysregulated apoptosis. The clinical success of ADCs specifically engineered to overcome MDR, including in heterogeneous tumors and cancer cells that exhibit bypass signaling, is well established. This is especially evident with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in HER2-low, HER2-positive, and HER2-mutant cancers; sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in TROP2-expressing triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and urothelial carcinoma; and enfortumab vedotin in Nectin-4-positive bladder cancer. By overcoming MDR, ADCs have enabled more effective treatment algorithms across multiple malignancies. Most importantly, the clinical application of ADCs has become inextricably linked to cancer genomics. HER2 testing has evolved from a two-tiered system to a continuous spectrum including HER2-ultralow, HER2-low, HER2-positive, and ERBB2-mutant categories. Each of these categories exhibits different eligibility guidelines for ADC patient selection. As cancer cells continue to evolve and develop resistance to even ADCs through mutations and variants, researchers and clinicians have used pharmacogenomics to predict ADC response and resistance. To define the genomic architecture of ADC-resistant tumor subpopulations, single-cell transcriptomic studies and liquid biopsy approaches are being used to enable real-time examination of the tumor genome during ADC therapy, thereby optimizing treatment and circumventing resistance driven by emerging mutations and variants. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the molecular structure of ADCs, the pharmacological principles underlying their potent cytotoxic activity against MDR cancer cells, the genomic and transcriptomic biomarkers that guide ADC patient selection, and the emerging resistance mechanisms that will shape the next generation of promising ADC development.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Suppression of AAV-Delivered Transgene Expression Using Artificial MicroRNAs Delivered by an Alternative AAV Serotype.

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene transfer vectors mediate long-term expression in nondividing cells, an advantage for treating chronic disorders. However, current platforms lack a way to selectively shut down transgene expression if adverse effects arise. To create an "off switch," we hypothesized that incorporating unique artificial microRNA (amiRNA) target sequences into an AAV expression cassette would allow subsequent suppression of transgene expression using a second AAV vector encoding the cognate amiRNA. We introduced 22-nt sequences absent from human and mouse transcriptomes into the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of a therapeutic AAV cassette. To identify optimal amiRNAs, two tandem copies of each amiRNA were cloned into the 3'UTR of an mCherry reporter gene. In vitro assessment of six amiRNA/target pairs using a dual luciferase assay identified four amiRNAs that efficiently suppressed reporter expression. Cells cotransfected with target site 3 (TS3) and amiRNA-T3B showed the greatest reduction in luciferase activity (80%, p < 0.0001) and were selected for further study. The "off-switch" system was then evaluated using an AAV5 therapeutic vector expressing a recombinant humanized anti-IgE monoclonal antibody (AAV5-TBG-anti-IgE-TS3), designed for long-term suppression of allergen-induced reactions. Co-transfection of HEK293T cells with anti-IgE-TS3 and amiRNA-T3B significantly reduced anti-IgE mRNA and protein levels relative to a control amiRNA (p < 0.0001). In vivo testing in Balb/c mice (n = 5) involved intravenous administration of AAV5-anti-IgE-TS3 (3.2 × 1010 gc), followed 4 weeks later by an AAVrh.10 amiRNA vector (AAVrh.10-TBG-amiRNA-T3B; 1 × 1011 gc). Control mice receiving only the therapeutic vector expressed 18.4 ± 13.8 µg/mL serum anti-IgE at 10 weeks. In contrast, mice receiving the amiRNA "off" vector showed marked suppression of anti-IgE (0.3 ± 0.15 µg/mL, p < 0.0001). These findings provide proof-of-concept that AAV-delivered amiRNAs can selectively switch off transgene expression, offering a strategy to improve the safety of AAV-mediated gene therapies.

Dependovirus↗

PubMed2026

Prognostic significance of NLRP-3 expression in solid cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The inflammasome is a critical immunological sensor comprised of NLRP-3, ASC, and CASPASE-1. Mutations in NLRP-3 are prevalent in inflammatory diseases. However, the role of NLRP-3 in cancer is controversial. This study investigates whether NLRP-3 expression is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with solid cancers. METHODS: PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were searched for articles reporting NLRP-3 expression and disease outcome data in cancer patients. RevMan Review Manager was used to calculate pooled hazard ratios and Mantel-Haenszel pooled odds ratios. RNA sequencing datasets from the TCGA Pan-Cancer (PANCAN) were used for external validation. RESULTS: Patients with higher NLRP-3 expression showed a significant association with larger tumor size, advanced tumor grade, TNM stage, and presence of metastasis. High NLRP-3 expression has a significant association with poor OS (HR:2.12, 95% CI = 1.49-3.03), p < 0.0001) and DFS (HR:1.86, 95% CI = 1.30- 2.65, p = 0.0007). Subgroup analysis showed that higher NLRP-3 expression is associated with worse OS in head and neck cancer (HR: 2.77, 95% CI = 1.88-4.09, p < 0.00001), colorectal cancers (HR:2.14, 95% CI= 1.59- 2.87, p < 0.00001), and pancreatic cancer patients (HR: 3.19, 95% CI = 1.73-5.91, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: High NLRP-3 expression is associated with advanced disease and poor outcomes in many solid tumours.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Venomous Lepidoptera: defensive toxin systems, venom composition, and clinical significance.

Venomous Lepidoptera constitute an underrecognized yet medically significant group of toxin-producing arthropods that employ contact-mediated defensive envenomation through specialized integumentary structures such as setae, spines, and scoli. Unlike actively stinging arthropods, these insects deliver venom passively upon contact, eliciting a diverse spectrum of clinical manifestations collectively termed lepidopterism. Clinical outcomes range from localized pain and dermatitis to severe systemic effects, including hemorrhagic syndromes, complement activation, and chronic inflammatory disorders. Recent advances in proteomic and transcriptomic technologies have transformed our understanding of lepidopteran venoms, revealing unexpectedly complex toxin repertoires comprising serine proteases, phospholipases, pore-forming proteins, disulfide-rich peptides, neuroactive RF-amide peptides, and immune-modulating components. These findings have provided new insights into the molecular basis of toxicity, host-pathogen interactions, and the evolutionary diversification of venom systems within Lepidoptera. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the morphology of venom-delivery structures, venom composition, mechanisms of action, and associated clinical manifestations, while highlighting medically important taxa, particularly species of the genus Lonomia. The successful development of antivenom against Lonomia envenomation underscores the translational relevance of lepidopteran toxin research and its potential for therapeutic innovation. By integrating molecular, clinical, and evolutionary perspectives, this review repositions venomous Lepidoptera as a legitimate and important component of arthropod toxinology. Furthermore, it identifies critical methodological limitations and key knowledge gaps, providing a framework for future investigations aimed at advancing our understanding of toxin biology, immunopathology, and the development of novel biomedical applications.

Animals↗