Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Maximum Tolerated Dose”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Maximum tolerable dose for avoidance of cataract induced by ultraviolet radiation-B for 18 to 60 week old rats.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the maximum tolerable dose for avoidance of UVR-B-induced cataract in rats in the age interval 18-60 weeks and establish the functional relationship between age and sensitivity to UVR-B. Four groups of 20 albino Sprague-Dawley rats each, aged 18, 26, 40 or 60 weeks, were included. Each age group was divided into five UVR dose sub-groups. The rats were unilaterally exposed to ultraviolet radiation (lambda(max)=302.6 nm, lambda0.5=4.5 nm). The incident dose on the cornea varied between 0 and 9.2 kJ m(-2). One week after exposure, the rats were sacrificed and both lenses were extracted. The intensity of forward light scattering was measured and photographs were taken. The functional relationship between age and sensitivity to UVR-B was estimated as the maximum tolerable dose based on rats age from 3 to 60 weeks. The maximum tolerable dose for 18, 26, 40, and 60 weeks, respectively, was estimated to 5.2, 4.9, 4.7, and 5.1 kJ m(-2). The sensitivity to UVR-B for Sprague-Dawley rats increases with increasing age during the first third of the rat life span, and then stabilizes to a constant level during the remaining two-thirds.

Aging↗
PubMed2005

Maximum tolerated dose of a humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody fragment for treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To investigate the maximum tolerated dose of ranibizumab administered as a single intravitreal injection. DESIGN: Open-label, 5-center, uncontrolled, prospective, dose-ranging, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with best-corrected Snellen equivalent visual acuity (VA) of 20/100 or worse and considered ineligible for laser photocoagulation or photodynamic therapy. METHODS: A single intravitreal injection of ranibizumab was to be administered at 1 of 6 escalating doses (50, 150, 300, 500, 1000, and 2000 microg), with escalation to the next dose level occurring only after the safety and tolerability of the lower dose level was established through postinjection day 14. Follow-up examinations were performed on postinjection days 1, 3, 7, 14, 42, and 90. Enrollment was stopped if > or =2 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary safety measures were changes from baseline in VA, intraocular pressure (IOP), intraocular inflammation, and production of antiranibizumab antibody. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined by intraocular inflammation, elevated IOP, reduced VA, or hemorrhage within 90 days after injection. RESULTS: All patients completed this single intravitreal injection study, and 500 microg of ranibizumab was the maximum tolerated dose. At the higher dose of 1000 microg, significant intraocular inflammation was noted. All adverse events were self-limited, and no infectious endophthalmitis occurred. Aqueous or vitreous ocular inflammation occurred in 12 subjects, with complete resolution within 42 days. In 9 of the subjects, the inflammation was graded as trace to 1+ and required no treatment; in 3 of the subjects, the inflammation was graded as 2+ or 3+, and 2 of the 3 were treated with topical 1% prednisolone acetate. No serum antiranibizumab antibodies were detected. All patients had VA similar or improved compared with baseline values. CONCLUSION: The maximum tolerated single dose of ranibizumab in neovascular AMD patients was 500 microg. Single intravitreal injections of ranibizumab up to a dose of 500 microg were safe and well tolerated in this small group of patients.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Phase I dose-escalation trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: usefulness of mathematic modeling to determine maximum-tolerable dose.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine the maximum-tolerated doses of gemcitabine and cisplatin, each given weekly for 3 weeks with a 1-week rest. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients less than 75 years of age were eligible if they had stage III/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), life expectancy > or = 12 weeks, hemoglobin level > or = 10 g/dL, granulocyte count > or = 2 x 10(9)/L, platelet count > or = 100 x 10(9)/L, hepatic enzymes < or = three times the upper limit of normal, and creatinine concentration < or = 130 mumoles/L. The starting doses for gemcitabine and cisplatin were 1,000 mg/m2 and 25 mg/m2 per week for 3 weeks. At dose level 2, cisplatin was increased to 30 mg/m2/wk for 3 weeks, and thereafter only gemcitabine was increased by 250 mg/m2/wk at each dose level to a maximum of 2,250 mg/m2/wk. RESULTS: There were 33 men and 17 women, with a median age of 62 years. Pathology included adenocarcinoma in 35 patients, squamous in eight, large cell in six, and mixed histology in one. Sixteen patients had stage III and 34 had stage IV tumors. The median nadir granulocyte and platelet counts decreased with each dose level, but cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in > or = two patients was not encountered in cycle 1, even at the highest dose level. Cumulative marrow toxicity was seen at all levels, which resulted in frequent dose reductions or omissions. A mathematic model of all toxicities over time suggested that dose level 4 (cisplatin 30 mg/m2/wk and gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m2/wk) would be the maximum dose at which grade 4 toxicity would be expected in < or = 33% of patients over four cycles. Of 47 assessable patients, 14 achieved a partial response (30%; confidence interval, 17% to 43%). The median duration was 16 weeks and the median survival time was 24 weeks (range, 3.5-64+). CONCLUSION: Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin are active against NSCLC, and the recommended phase II doses are 30 and 1,500 mg/m2/wk for 3 weeks, respectively.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1991

A critique of the use of the maximum tolerated dose in bioassays to assess cancer risks from chemicals.

The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) regimen for testing substances for their ability to induce cancer and other chronic diseases in laboratory rodents has been required by governmental authorities for several decades. Cancer researchers originally suggested the MTD approach and it was then adopted by the FDA and EPA. The intention was to detect the ability of any substance under any circumstances, including the most extreme, to induce cancer in laboratory rodents. We question the validity of using the MTD in animal bioassays to evaluate risk for human cancer. The paradox is that the safer the chemical, the higher the MTD, but the higher the MTD, the more likely that biochemical distortions will result and cause cellular injury, abnormal cell replication, toxic hyperplasia, and toxicity-induced cancer. All chemicals are toxic at some dose, whether relevant to anticipated human exposure or vastly exceeding it. New approaches to cancer-testing lifetime bioassays are needed. A minimally toxic dose is defined and suggested to avoid specific tissue toxicity detected by clinical or pathology examination in animals subchronically exposed to the test compound for 90 days. The highest subtoxic dose that can be tolerated by test animals over a long period of time is suggested as being more appropriate for carcinogenicity bioassays.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Maximum tolerated dose of 67Cu-2IT-BAT-LYM-1 for fractionated radioimmunotherapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Lym-1, a monoclonal antibody (MoAb) that preferentially targets malignant lymphocytes, has induced therapeutic responses in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) when labeled with iodine-131 (131I). Radiometal labeled antibodies provide a higher tumor radiation dose than the corresponding 131I labeled antibodies. Based on the strategy of fractionating the total radiation dose, this study was designed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the first 2, of a maximum of 4, doses of 67Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1 given 4 weeks apart. Additionally, toxicity, radiation dosimetry and efficacy were assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients had Ann Arbor stage IVB NHL, resistant to standard therapy, including multiple chemotherapy regimens. Each dose of 67Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1 was given after a preload of unmodified Lym-1. A 10 mCi imaging dose of 67Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1 was given in order to assess pharmacokinetics and radiation dosimetry prior to therapy. Based on the MTD for 131I-Lym-1 and comparative dosimetry for 131I-Lym-1 and 67Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1, the trial was initiated at 60 millicuries per square meter of body surface area (mCi/m2) in cohorts of 3 patients. RESULTS: A single cohort of patients proved sufficient to define the MTD as 60 mCi/m2 for each of the first 2 doses of 67Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1. The dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Neutropenic sepsis and bleeding did not occur. Mean radiation dose contributed to the bone marrow by 67Cu in the body and blood was 0.2 (range, 0.2 to 0.3) rads/mCi. Copper-67 incorporated into ceruloplasmin contributed 25% of the dose to marrow from blood. Non-hematologic toxicities did not exceed grade 2. The three patients had substantial tumor regression even after imaging doses of 67Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1. After therapy, one response was complete with a duration of 12 months. Radiation doses to tumors in this patient varied from 7.0-21.9 rads/mCi or 5420-7000 total rads from the course of therapy. CONCLUSION: 67Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1 provided good imaging, favorable radiation dosimetry and a remarkably high therapeutic index (ratio of tumor to marrow radiation doses). The non-myeloablative MTD for each of 2 doses was 60 mCi/m2.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

The relationship between use of the maximum tolerated dose and study sensitivity for detecting rodent carcinogenicity.

The relationship between maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and study sensitivity for detecting rodent carcinogenicity was evaluated for 216 chemicals found to be carcinogens in laboratory animal studies conducted by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the National Toxicology Program (NTP). Approximately two-thirds of these rodent carcinogens would have been detected even without the top dose (estimated MTD), but in many of these studies, some site-specific carcinogenic effects would have been missed. Among the remaining one-third of the rodent carcinogens that required the top dose for statistical significance, approximately 80% had numerically elevated rates of the same site-specific tumors at lower doses as well. Only 13 of the NCI/NTP rodent carcinogens had increased tumor rates limited to the top dose for all sites of carcinogenicity. Alternatively, of the 838 site-specific carcinogenic effects observed in the NCI/NTP studies, 447 (53%) would have been detected even without the top dose. Of the remaining effects, 75% (294/391) showed numerically elevated site-specific tumor rates at lower doses. Our evaluation indicates that most carcinogenic effects observed at the top dose in rodent studies are also present (with reduced incidence that might or might not be statistically significant) at the lower doses typically employed (1/2MTD, 1/4MTD).

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Safety and tolerability of metrifonate in patients with Alzheimer's disease: results of a maximum tolerated dose study.

Metrifonate, a pro-drug that is transformed non-enzymatically into a potent inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), has been used in the tropics for over 30 years for the treatment of schistosomiasis. A pilot study, and Phase I and Phase II studies of metrifonate in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients conducted prior to the current study showed benign, dose-dependent adverse event profiles consisting primarily of gastrointestinal events, optimal daily dosing with a loading phase (in the absence of a loading dose phase, 6-8 weeks were required to attain steady-state AChE inhibition levels), and an improvement in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) scores. The current open-label study was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of relatively high loading doses, followed by lower maintenance doses of metrifonate in the same patient population, and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of metrifonate. Accordingly, the first cohort of 8 probable AD patients (per National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association [NINCDS-ADRDA] criteria) were administered once-daily loading doses of 2.5 mg/kg (125-225 mg) for 14 days, followed by 4.0 mg/kg (200-360 mg) for an additional 3 days. These patients were maintained on once-daily doses of 2.0 mg/kg (100-180 mg) for 14 days. AChE inhibition for this cohort ranged from 88% to 94%. On Day 28 of 31, this cohort was discontinued due to moderate to severe side effects in 6 patients; consequently, the second cohort of 8 probable AD patients received a once-daily loading dose of 2.5 mg/kg (125-225 mg) for 14 days followed by a once-daily maintenance dose of 1.5 mg/kg (75-135 mg) for 35 days. This maintenance dose yielded an AChE inhibition level ranging from 89% to 91%. In spite of an AChE inhibition level comparable to that achieved with the higher dose, the reduced dose was associated with a more favorable adverse event profile which was mainly gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal in nature. The maximum tolerated dose was established at 1.5 mg/kg/day (75-135 mg/day) for maintenance dosing in AD patients.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Phase I trial of dose escalation with growth factor support in patients with previously untreated diffuse aggressive lymphomas: determination of the maximum-tolerated dose of ProMACE-CytaBOM.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, prednisone, bleomycin, cytarabine, methotrexate, and leucovorin (ProMACE-CytaBOM) when the myelotoxic drugs cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, and cytarabine are escalated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight eligible patients with diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated on a phase I trial of dose escalation using the ProMACE-CytaBOM regimen and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; Schering, Kenilworth, NJ). Patients were treated with recombinant (r)GM-CSF 10 microg/kg/d subcutaneously from day 9 to 19. Twenty-seven patients had stage IV disease, four had stage III, and seven had bulky stage II. Half of the patients had bone marrow involvement. The median age was 45 years. RESULTS: We found that the MTD was 200% for the escalated drugs in this regimen (although we never escalated above the MTD or defined by dose-limiting toxicity) and that the normalized dose-intensity (NDI; defined as the ratio of the received dose-intensity to the 100% dose-intensity of ProcMACE-CytaBOM) decreased with each cycle and was lower for the day-8 drug (cytarabine) than for the day-1 drugs. The complete response (CR) rate was 66%, and 92% of patients who achieved CR are alive without disease with a median follow-up time for survival of 3.6 years. CONCLUSION: The MTD of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, and cytarabine in the ProMACE-CytaBOM regimen given with growth factor support is 200%, and this dose should be tested in larger phase II trials.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Maximum tolerated dose and pharmacodynamics of eptastigmine in elderly healthy volunteers.

Eptastigmine is a new acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor currently under development for the symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer disease. This study was conducted to establish the maximum tolerated dose and the pharmacodynamics of eptastigmine in nine healthy elderly volunteers. Subjects received single oral doses of 8 mg, 20 mg, 32 mg, and 40 mg eptastigmine and placebo according to a double-blind, randomized, rising-dose, five-way crossover design. Adverse events, blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature, forced expiratory volume, salivary flow, and pupilar activity were closely monitored during treatment. Pharmacodynamic activity of eptastigmine was evaluated with an assay of AChE activity in red blood cells. Eptastigmine doses of 8 mg, 20 mg, and 32 mg were well tolerated. Two of four subjects receiving the 40-mg dose developed profound AChE inhibition (58-59%) and reported severe adverse events (nausea, vomiting, syncope, and bradycardia), precluding further administration in the remaining subjects. Eptastigmine administration produced a weak effect on supine heart rate, body temperature, and pupil diameter. There were no effects on blood pressure, forced expiratory volume, salivary flow, and near point of focus. Acetylcholinesterase activity was inhibited in a dose-related fashion according to a sigmoidal (logistic) function. The mean (+/- SEM) maximum inhibition of AChE activity (Imax) was 14.5+/-3.3%, 20.4+/-2.3%, 28.7+/-2.9%, 45.2+/-1.3% and 53.6+/-2.9% after placebo, 8 mg, 20 mg, 32 mg, and 40 mg of eptastigmine, respectively. The theoretical maximum response (Emax) was 72.9%, and the dose that produced half of the maximum response (ED50) was 29.5 mg. At 24 hours, residual AChE inhibition ranged from 9% to 15%, with a half-life of recovery of the enzyme of approximately 10 hours. The maximum tolerated dose of eptastigmine after single-dose oral administration in healthy elderly subjects is 32 mg. Single oral doses of eptastigmine produce sustained, dose-related inhibition of AChE activity. Adverse events are related to the degree of AChE inhibition.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

An overview of the report: correlation between carcinogenic potency and the maximum tolerated dose: implications for risk assessment.

Current practice in carcinogen bioassay calls for exposure of experimental animals at doses up to and including the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Such studies have been used to compute measures of carcinogenic potency such as the TD50 as well as unit risk factors such as q1 * for predicting low-dose risks. Recent studies have indicated that these measures of carcinogenic potency are highly correlated with the MTD. Carcinogenic potency has also been shown to be correlated with indicators of mutagenicity and toxicity. Correlation of the MTDs for rats and mice implies a corresponding correlation in TD50 values for these two species. The implications of these results for cancer risk assessment are examined in light of the large variation in potency among chemicals known to induce tumors in rodents.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Maximum-tolerated dose, toxicity, and efficacy of (131)I-Lym-1 antibody for fractionated radioimmunotherapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Lym-1, a monoclonal antibody that preferentially targets malignant lymphocytes, has induced remissions in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) when labeled with iodine 131 ((131)I). Based on the strategy of fractionating the total dose, this study was designed to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and efficacy of the first two, of a maximum of four, doses of (131)I-Lym-1 given 4 weeks apart. Additionally, toxicity and radiation dosimetry were assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with advanced NHL entered the study a total of 21 times. Thirteen (62%) of the 21 entries had diffuse large-cell histologies. All patients had disease resistant to standard therapy and had received a mean of four chemotherapy regimens. (131)I-Lym-1 was given after Lym-1 and (131)I was escalated in cohorts of patients from 40 to 100 mCi (1.5 to 3.7 GBq)/m2 body surface area. RESULTS: Mean radiation dose to the bone marrow from body and blood (131)I was 0.34 (range, 0. 1 6 to 0.63) rad/mCi (0.09 mGy/MBq; range, 0.04 to 0.17 mGy/ MBq). Dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia with an MTD of 100 mCi/m2 (3.7 GBq/m2) for each of the first two doses of (131)I-Lym-1 given 4 weeks apart. Nonhematologic toxicities did not exceed grade 2 except for one instance of grade 3 hypotension. Ten (71 %) of 14 entries who received at least two doses of (131)I-Lym-1 therapy and 11 (52%) of 21 total entries responded. Seven of the responses were complete, with a mean duration of 14 months. All three entries in the 100 mCi/m2 (3.7 MBq/m2) cohort had complete remissions (CRs). All responders had at least a partial remission (PR) after the first therapy dose of (131)I-Lym-1. CONCLUSION: (131)I-Lym-1 induced durable remissions in patients with NHL resistant to chemotherapy and was associated with acceptable toxicity. The nonmyeloablative MTD for each of the first two doses of (131)I-Lym-1 was 100 mCi/m2 (total, 200 mCi/m2) (3.7 GBq/m2; total, 7.4 GBq/m2).

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Model-guided determination of maximum tolerated dose in phase I clinical trials: evidence for increased precision.

BACKGROUND: A widely used phase I design in clinical trials of chemotherapy for cancer and for AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) allows for dose escalation in cohorts of three to six patients. Escalation continues until a predefined percentage of patients experience unacceptable toxic effects at a given dose level. A safe and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for phase II study is then determined. This standard phase I study design has serious inadequacies. MTD is not a model-based estimate of the true dose that would yield the targeted dose-limiting toxicity rate. Moreover, this simplistic study design allows some patients in the phase I study to be treated at doses unlikely to have therapeutic efficacy. PURPOSE: We constructed a novel quantitative assessment design that repetitively evaluates accumulating dose-toxicity data by repeatedly fitting and updating a pharmacodynamic model after small cohorts of patients are treated. The goal was to more accurately estimate the MTD. METHODS: One hundred phase I studies were simulated by both the standard and quantitative assessment phase I designs. We compared determination of MTD, frequency of grade 0 leukopenia (no toxicity), and study size in the studies simulated using the standard design with those in the studies simulated using the quantitative assessment design. RESULTS: The median MTD determined from the 100 studies was nearly identical for the two designs: 100 and 95 mg/m2 per day for standard and quantitative assessment designs, respectively. However, the interstudy variation in the MTD was decreased in the quantitative assessment design. Moreover, the study size was significantly reduced (P < .0001), and the median percentage of patients treated at subtoxic doses (no leukopenia) was significantly lower for the quantitative assessment design (44% versus 48%; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Our results show clear evidence that a phase I study design using dose and toxicity data in a repetitive and quantitative manner can identify the MTD with more accuracy than the standard design. IMPLICATIONS: New approaches must be explored to improve our ability to identify the optimal dose for phase II studies of chemotherapy for cancer and for AIDS. There is evidence that the quantitative assessment design will identify the MTD with fewer patients, more precision, and fewer patients exposed to suboptimal doses.

Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic↗
PubMed2005

A Bayesian evaluation of enrolling additional patients at the maximum tolerated dose in Phase I trials.

At the end of the dose escalation stage of Phase I trials, investigators occasionally enroll additional patients at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) to further explore the tolerability of the regimen. There is no explicit statistical justification for doing so; neither are there any guidelines regarding the use of toxicity information from this additional cohort with respect to the modification of MTD if necessary. This article addresses both of these issues using a Bayesian approach to model the probability of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at the MTD. This approach takes the sequential nature of the Phase I design into account and provides predictive and posterior distributions through which various probabilities of interest can be calculated. The results suggest that MTD is usually not well defined with a cohort of 3-6 patients in the traditional dose escalation schema. Therefore, enrolling additional patients at the MTD is recommended. Also demonstrated are different ways to use the posterior density, after the additional cohort is enrolled, to decide whether the MTD is unacceptably toxic.

Bayes Theorem↗
PubMed2006

A model-based approach in the estimation of the maximum tolerated dose in phase I cancer clinical trials.

The primary aim of a phase I cancer clinical trial is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a new agent. The MTD is determined as the highest dose level of a potential therapeutic agent at which the patients have experienced an acceptable level of dose limiting toxicity. Although many other types of designs have been proposed in recent years, the traditional algorithm-based designs, especially the 3+3 designs, are still widely used due to their practical simplicity. Simulation studies have shown that the traditional algorithm-based designs cannot provide reasonable estimates of the MTD due to their intrinsic design limitations. In this paper, we propose a model-based approach in the estimation of the MTD following a traditional 3+3 design. Simulation results indicate that our model-based approach produces much less biased estimates of the MTD compared to the estimates obtained from the traditional 3+3 designs. Furthermore, our model-based approach can be easily extended to any traditional A+B design.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2006

Determination of the maximum tolerated dose and the safety index of an experimental fasciolicide in cattle.

The aim of the present study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the safety index (SI) of 5-chloro-2-methylthio-6-(1-napthyloxy)1H-benzimidazole, called compound alpha, in cattle. In addition, to search for possible adverse effects after treatment, the measurement of some biochemical, haematological and physiological parameters were also analysed. Eighteen crossbred heifers were divided into six groups of three animals each. Groups 1-5 received a single oral dose of 12, 36, 60, 120 and 180 mg/kg of body weight (bw) of compound alpha. Group 6 served as an untreated control. To determine the biochemical, haematological and enzymatic parameters, sera and blood samples were individually taken at 0, 4, 8, 16, 32, 128, and 720 h after treatment. Physiological parameters such as rectal temperature, heart rate (HR), respiration rate (RR) and ruminal motility were measured at the time intervals mentioned above. Estimation of the MTD and SI was obtained by using the formula reported by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the results showing an MTD of 180 mg/kg/bw and an SI of 15 times the recommended clinical dose. Some statistical differences were observed in a few of the biochemical, haematological and enzymatic parameters, the adverse effects being not highly representative. Alterations on HR and RR were statistically different (P<0.05) only in heifers treated with 180 mg.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

A phase II study in patients with Alzheimer's disease to assess the preliminary efficacy and maximum tolerated dose of rivastigmine (Exelon).

Rivastigmine is a carbamate acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor with central selectivity. Early studies showed that daily doses up to 6 mg/day have some efficacy in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). The present study was designed to assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of rivastigmine at doses up to 12 mg/day. A total of 114 patients with mild-moderate DAT were randomly assigned to either rivastigmine (b.i.d. (twice daily) or t.i.d. (three times daily)) or placebo in a double-blind fashion titrated to their maximum tolerated dose over 10 weeks followed by an eight-week maintenance phase. The mean maximum tolerated dose was approximately 10 mg/day (b.i.d. or t.i.d.). Gastrointestinal complaints, the majority of which were mild to moderate, were the most frequently reported adverse events. No clinically relevant changes in vital signs, haematology or organ function were detected. Significantly more patients taking rivastigmine b.i.d. were considered improved according to the Clinicians' Interview-Based Impression of Change-Plus (CIBIC-Plus) vs. placebo (57% vs. 16%, respectively; P = 0.027). The Nurses' Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients (NOSGER) (memory component) and the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) also improved in the rivastigmine b.i.d. group vs. placebo (mean change from baseline on NOSGER = -0.7 vs. +1.3, respectively; P = 0.037: mean change from baseline on ADAS-cog = -2.7 vs. +0.2, respectively; P = 0.054). Despite the relatively small size and limited duration of the study, the finding that rivastigmine induced changes in the same (positive) direction in all three dimensions measured suggests that rivastigmine at doses of up to 12 mg/day has useful efficacy in patients with mild-moderate DAT. Reports from larger phase III studies confirm this finding. The results of this study also suggest that b.i.d. is the more efficacious regimen and has comparable tolerability to the t.i.d. regimen.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Microvascular perturbations in rats receiving the maximum tolerated dose of methotrexate or its major metabolite 7-hydroxymethotrexate.

Methotrexate (MTX) is a clinically important cytostatic antifolate. The study describes the acute effects of maximum tolerated doses of MTX or its major metabolite 7-hydroxymethotrexate (7-OH-MTX) on the ultrastructure of rat liver and kidneys. The ultrastructural changes in rats receiving MTX or 7-OH-MTX were, in principle, indistinguishable and their severity and extension increased with time of survival or doses of medication. All lesions were focal, microvascular, or parenchymal. Microvascular changes were more severe in nature when blood cells were present. The endothelial cells were swollen with loss of pinocytotic vesicles, their luminal plasma membrane formed blebs or were disrupted. Partly detached endothelial cells or deendothelialized areas, various types of white blood cells, in particular, neutrophil granulocytes, were observed in the microcirculation. Single platelets or small platelet aggregates were found either in the lumen or adhering to deendothelialized areas of injured endothelial cells. Hepatocytes exhibited steatosis, edema, and manifest single cell necrosis. There were also nuclear changes, marked proliferation of smooth endoplasmatic reticulum, increased amounts of intracellular lipid vacuoles, and a decrease in glycogen particles in hepatocytes. The kidney presented the major changes in the tubules and in the interstitial part. MTX and 7-OH-MTX acute toxicity may primarily be related to microvascular perturbation.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Interspecies scaling of maximum tolerated dose of anticancer drugs: relevance to starting dose for phase I clinical trials.

This analysis was carried out to compare the predictive performance of two different approaches of allometry for the prediction of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in humans from animal data. The two approaches used to predict MTD in humans in this analysis were (1) the use of a fixed exponent of 0.75 and the LD(10) in mice and (2) the use of the LD(10) or MTD data from at least three animal species (interspecies scaling). Twenty-five anticancer drugs were taken from the literature and used in this analysis. The results of the study indicate that MTD can be predicted more accurately using interspecies scaling than using a fixed exponent of 0.75. Incorporation of a correction factor known as mean life-span potential can also be used for the improved prediction of MTD for some drugs. One third of the predicted MTD from interspecies scaling can be used as a starting dose in humans. This approach will save time and avoid many unnecessary steps in attaining MTD in humans.

Animals↗