Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Lopinavir”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Identification of genotypic changes in human immunodeficiency virus protease that correlate with reduced susceptibility to the protease inhibitor lopinavir among viral isolates from protease inhibitor-experienced patients.

The association of genotypic changes in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease with reduced in vitro susceptibility to the new protease inhibitor lopinavir (previously ABT-378) was explored using a panel of viral isolates from subjects failing therapy with other protease inhibitors. Two statistical tests showed that specific mutations at 11 amino acid positions in protease (L10F/I/R/V, K20M/R, L24I, M46I/L, F53L, I54L/T/V, L63P, A71I/L/T/V, V82A/F/T, I84V, and L90M) were associated with reduced susceptibility. Mutations at positions 82, 54, 10, 63, 71, and 84 were most closely associated with relatively modest (4- and 10-fold) changes in phenotype, while the K20M/R and F53L mutations, in conjunction with multiple other mutations, were associated with >20- and >40-fold-reduced susceptibility, respectively. The median 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC(50)) of lopinavir against isolates with 0 to 3, 4 or 5, 6 or 7, and 8 to 10 of the above 11 mutations were 0.8-, 2.7-, 13.5-, and 44.0-fold higher, respectively, than the IC(50) against wild-type HIV. On average, the IC(50) of lopinavir increased by 1.74-fold per mutation in isolates containing three or more mutations. Each of the 16 viruses that displayed a >20-fold change in susceptibility contained mutations at residues 10, 54, 63, and 82 and/or 84, along with a median of three mutations at residues 20, 24, 46, 53, 71, and 90. The number of protease mutations from the 11 identified in these analyses (the lopinavir mutation score) may be useful for the interpretation of HIV genotypic resistance testing with respect to lopinavir-ritonavir (Kaletra) regimens and may provide insight into the genetic barrier to resistance to lopinavir-ritonavir in both antiretroviral therapy-naive and protease inhibitor-experienced patients.

Drug Resistance↗
PubMed2006

Validation and application of a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method for simultaneous quantification of lopinavir and ritonavir in human plasma using semi-automated 96-well liquid-liquid extraction.

Kaletra is an important antiretroviral drug, which has been developed by Abbott Laboratories. It is composed of lopinavir (low-pin-a-veer) and ritonavir (ri-toe-na-veer). Both have been proved to be human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors and have substantially reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with HIV-1 infection. We have developed and validated an assay, using liquid chromatography coupled with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS), for the routine quantification of lopinavir and ritonavir in human plasma, in which lopinavir and ritonavir can be simultaneously analyzed with high throughput. The sample preparation consisted of liquid-liquid extraction with a mixture of hexane: ethyl acetate (1:1, v/v), using 100 microL of plasma. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Waters Symmetry C(18) column (150 mm x 3.9 mm, particle size 5 microm) with reverse-phase isocratic using mobile phase of 70:30 (v/v) acetonitrile: 2 mM ammonium acetate aqueous solution containing 0.01% formic acid (v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. A Waters symmetry C(18) guard column (20 mm x 3.9 mm, particle size 5 microm) was connected prior to the analytical column, and a guard column back wash was performed to reduce the analytical column contamination using a mixture of tetrahydrofuran (THF), methanol and water (45:45:10, v/v/v). The analytical run was 4 min. The use of a 96-well plate autosampler allowed a batch size up to 73 study samples. A triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer was operated in a positive ion mode and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) was used for drug quantification. The method was validated over the concentration ranges of 19-5,300 ng/mL for lopinavir and 11-3,100 ng/mL for ritonavir. A-86093 was used as an internal standard (I.S.). The relative standard deviation (RSD) were <6% for both lopinavir and ritonavir. Mean accuracies were between the designed limits (+/-15%). The robust and rapid LC/MS/MS assay has been successfully applied for routine assay to support bioavailability, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetics studies.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2005

Liver injury and changes in hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA load associated with protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy for treatment-naive HCV-HIV-coinfected patients: lopinavir-ritonavir versus nelfinavir.

BACKGROUND: Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) initiation in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been associated with transaminase and HCV viral load flares. Previous studies have included highly variable antiretroviral regimens. We compared effects of 2 protease inhibitor-based regimens on alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and HCV loads in HCV-HIV-coinfected patients initiating HAART. METHODS: Seventy HIV-infected patients with positive baseline results of HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay from a treatment trial comparing lopinavir-ritonavir with nelfinavir were evaluated during a 48-week period. HCV and HIV titers were analyzed at baseline, at weeks 24 and 48 of treatment, and during flares in the ALT level of >5 times the upper limit of normal. RESULTS: A total of 57 of 70 patients tested positive for HCV RNA at baseline. HCV titers for patients in lopinavir-ritonavir and nelfinavir groups, respectively, were as follows: baseline, 6.07 and 6.22 log IU/mL; week 24 of treatment, 6.68 and 6.48 log IU/mL; and week 48 of treatment, 6.32 and 6.44 log IU/mL. Of patients with a CD4+ cell count of <100 cells/mm3 at baseline, 5 of 11 in the nelfinavir group and 0 of 10 in the lopinavir-ritonavir group had an increase in the HCV load of >0.5 log IU/mL from baseline to week 48. The mean ALT level increased by 45 U/L at 24 weeks and 18 U/L at 48 weeks in the nelfinavir group but decreased by 18 U/L at 24 weeks and 7 U/L at 48 weeks in the lopinavir-ritonavir group. Eight patients in the nelfinavir group and 2 patients in the lopinavir-ritonavir group had grade 3 or 4 flares in the ALT level. CONCLUSIONS: HAART initiation is associated with increased HCV loads and ALT levels. A low baseline CD4+ cell count is associated with persistent increases in the HCV RNA load in nelfinavir-treated patients. These results warrant careful interpretation of abnormalities in the ALT load after HAART initiation in HCV-HIV-coinfected patients to prevent premature discontinuation of treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Analysis of protease inhibitor combinations in vitro: activity of lopinavir, amprenavir and tipranavir against HIV type 1 wild-type and drug-resistant isolates.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing number of antiretroviral compounds, the number of useful drug regimens is limited owing to the high frequency of cross-resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied in vitro two-drug combinations using three protease inhibitors (PIs), tipranavir, amprenavir and lopinavir, on isolates (003 and 004) derived from patients with resistance to multiple PIs compared with the drug-susceptible isolate 14aPre in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Drug interactions were determined by median dose-effect analysis, with the combination index calculated at several inhibitory concentrations (IC). RESULTS: In 14aPre experiments, the combination tipranavir + lopinavir demonstrated synergy at low concentrations (IC(50)), an additive effect at IC(75) and antagonism at IC(90)-IC(95); tipranavir + amprenavir were antagonistic at all concentrations except IC(95), where they were synergic; and the lopinavir + amprenavir combination was always antagonistic. In 003 and 004 infections, tipranavir + lopinavir and tipranavir + amprenavir combinations were antagonistic, and lopinavir + amprenavir were synergic, at all concentrations, with the exception of being additive at IC(95). CONCLUSIONS: Our in vitro experiments did not show any advantage in combining second generation PIs as a therapeutic strategy in naive or multi-treatment failure subjects, with the exception of tipranavir + amprenavir at IC(95) in infections by a wild-type isolate.

Carbamates↗
PubMed2004

A prospective, controlled study assessing the effect of lopinavir on amprenavir concentrations boosted by ritonavir.

In a controlled, prospective study, the efficacy of ritonavir 200 mg twice daily (bid) in inhibiting the decrease of amprenavir plasma concentrations caused by co-administration of lopinavir was assessed. Twelve HIV-seropositive patients were enrolled, and nine patients completed the 28-day study. At day 14, plasma concentrations of amprenavir 600 mg bid and ritonavir 200 mg bid were determined over 12 h. At day 15, lopinavir 400 mg bid was added. At day 28, plasma concentrations of amprenavir, ritonavir and lopinavir were assessed. Co-administration of lopinavir was found to decrease the amprenavir concentration, determined as the median area under the curve over 12 h (AUC12), by 25% (AUC12 24.9 microg/h/mL vs. 18.5 microg/h/mL; P<0.01), despite the presence of ritonavir 200 mg bid. Eight participants discontinued the study regimen during the first 6 weeks because of adverse gastrointestinal events. In conclusion, gastrointestinal tolerance of a regimen containing an increased dose of ritonavir 200 mg bid was low, while the regimen did not prevent a decrease of amprenavir and possibly lopinavir plasma concentrations.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2006

Population analysis of weight-, age-, and sex-related differences in the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir in children from birth to 18 years.

The pharmacokinetics of lopinavir were investigated by the use of a population approach performed with the nonlinear mixed effect modeling program NONMEM and 157 children ranging in age from 3 days to 18 years. The pharmacokinetics of lopinavir were well described by a one-compartment model in which the absorption and the elimination rate constants were equal. Typical population estimates of the apparent volume of distribution (V/F) and plasma clearance (CL/F) were 24.6 liters and 2.58 liters/h, respectively. The lopinavir V/F and CL/F were both related to body weight (BW), with an important increase in weight-normalized CL/F for the lowest BW. Combined treatment with lopinavir and nevirapine was found to increase the CL/F. The lopinavir CL/F was also age and sex related, as a 39% increase was observed after the age of 12 years for boys compared to the CL/F for girls. The consequences of these pharmacokinetic discrepancies and the necessity to modify the currently recommended dosage regimen should be further investigated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Salvage therapy with amprenavir, lopinavir and ritonavir 200 mg/d or 400 mg/d in HIV-infected patients in virological failure.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the antiviral efficacy of a salvage therapy combining lopinavir and amprenavir with 200 mg/d or 400 mg/d ritonavir, together with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, over a 26-week period in HIV-infected patients in whom multiple antiretroviral regimens had failed. DESIGN: Phase IIb, randomized, open-label, multicentre trial. Patients were eligible if they had <500 CD4+ cells/mm3 and >4 log10 copies/ml HIV-RNA after treatment with at least two protease inhibitors (PIs) and one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. RESULTS: At baseline (n=37), the median CD4+ cell count was 207/mm3 and the median plasma HIV-1 RNA level was 4.7 log10 copies/ml; the median number of PI mutations was seven and the median decrease in phenotypic susceptibility to lopinavir and amprenavir was 9.7 and 2.6, respectively. The mean number of antiretrovirals received prior to randomization was 7.7. The fall in the median HIV-1 RNA level at week 26 was -1.4 log10 copies/ml in the 200 mg/d ritonavir group and -2.5 log10 copies/ml in the 400 mg/d group (P=0.02). Viral load fell below 50 copies/ml in 32% and 61% of patients, respectively (P=0.07). After adjustment for the ritonavir dose, a smaller number of PI mutations was the only baseline characteristic associated with a better virological response at week 26. Amprenavir concentrations were significantly lower in presence of lopinavir. The lopinavir inhibitory quotient at week 6 correlated weakly with the change in the HIV-RNA level at week 26. CONCLUSION: Combination of amprenavir, lopinavir and 400 mg/d ritonavir shows significant virological efficacy without increased toxicity in HIV-infected patients in whom multiple antiretroviral regimens have failed.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Discovery of imidazolidine-2,4-dione-linked HIV protease inhibitors with activity against lopinavir-resistant mutant HIV.

A new series of HIV protease inhibitors has been designed and synthesized based on the combination of the (R)-(hydroxyethylamino)sulfonamide isostere and the cyclic urea component of lopinavir. The series was optimized by replacing the 6-membered cyclic urea linker with an imidazolidine-2,4-dione which readily underwent N-alkylation to incorporate various methylene-linked heterocycle groups that bind favorably in site 3 of HIV protease. Significant improvements compared to lopinavir were seen in cell culture activity versus wild-type virus (pNL4-3) and the lopinavir-resistant mutant virus A17 (generated by in vitro serial passage of HIV-1 (pNL4-3) in MT-4 cells). Select imidazolidine-2,4-dione containing PIs were also more effective at inhibiting highly resistant patient isolates Pt1 and Pt2 than lopinavir. Pharmacokinetic data collected for compounds in this series varied considerably when coadministered orally in the rat with an equal amount of ritonavir (5 mg/kg each). The AUC values ranged from 0.144 to 12.33 microg h/mL.

Crystallography, X-Ray↗
PubMed2006

Effects of lopinavir-ritonavir combined therapy during the rat pregnancy. Morphological and biochemical aspects.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the biochemical and morphological effects in rats subjected to three different dose associations of the protease inhibitors lopinavir and ritonavir administered throughout the entire period of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: The animals were treated throughout pregnancy with daily oral doses of lopinavir+ritonavir starting at the day one of pregnancy, and were divided into four groups: E1, 13.3+3.3 mg/kg; E2, 39.9+9.9 mg/kg; E3, 119.7+29.9 mg/kg and C, control (drug vehicle, propyleneglycol). The animals were then sacrificed and maternal blood and fetal and maternal organ samples were taken for morphological and biochemical analysis. RESULTS: No major changes were identified in the group treated with the lowest dose as compared with the control. In the group E2, we found hepatocytes with signs of atrophy, eosinophilic cytoplasm, picnotic nuclei and vasodilatation. The proximal convoluted tubules of maternal kidneys showed eosinophilic areas and hyperchromatic nuclei, as well as signs of vasodilation. In the group treated with the highest dose (group E3), in the maternal kidneys and livers, the morphological changes were similar to those found in E2, although more prominent. Regarding the fetal organs, the single abnormality observed was some liver vasodilation in the group E3 (highest dose). The treatment with lopinavir+ritonavir caused discrete, yet significant, alterations of aspartate aminotransferase activity, blood urea nitrogen and creatinine plasma levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that the administration of a combination of lopinavir plus ritonavir to pregnant rats can cause morphological as well as functional changes in maternal and fetal liver and kidneys and, in higher than therapeutic doses, might be toxic to those animals.

Alanine Transaminase↗
PubMed2002

Simultaneous determination of indinavir, ritonavir and lopinavir (ABT 378) in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography.

An isocratic reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic method with ultraviolet detection at 205 nm has been validated for the determination of indinavir, ritonavir and lopinavir (ABT 378) in human plasma. The ritonavir analogue A-86093.0 was used as internal standard. Good chromatographic separation was achieved using a stainless steel column packed with 5 microm Phenomenex phenyl hexyl material operated at 40 degrees C, and a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile-10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (50:50, v/v). The calibration curve for indinavir was linear over the range of 50 to 1000 microg/l while the ritonavir and lopinavir calibration curves were linear over the range of 100 to 15,000 microg/l. The lower limit of quantitations for indinavir, ritonavir and lopinavir were 50, 100 and 100 microg/l, respectively, using 500 microl of human plasma. The validation data showed that the assay is sensitive, specific and reproducible for determination of indinavir, ritonavir and lopinavir. This method is being used in a therapeutic drug monitoring service to quantitate these therapeutic agents in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2003

Enhanced prediction of lopinavir resistance from genotype by use of artificial neural networks.

Our objective was to accurately predict, from complex mutation patterns, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistance to the protease inhibitor lopinavir, by use of artificial intelligence. Two neural network models were constructed: 1 based on changes at 11 positions in the protease that were previously recognized as being significant for lopinavir resistance and another based on a newly derived set of 28 mutations that were identified by performing category prevalence analysis. Both models were trained, validated, and tested with 1322 clinical samples. A procedure of determining the optimal neural network parameters was proposed to speed up the training processes. The results suggested that the 28-mutation set was a more accurate predictor of lopinavir susceptibility (correlation coefficient, R2=0.88). We identified potentially significant new mutations associated with lopinavir resistance and demonstrated the utility of neural network models in predicting phenotypic susceptibility from complex genotypes.

Drug Resistance, Viral↗
PubMed2006

Association of total bilirubin with indinavir and lopinavir plasma concentrations in HIV-infected patients receiving three different double-boosted dosing regimens.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of three different indinavir and lopinavir/ritonavir dosing regimens. METHODS: HIV-infected adults receiving lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily with food had nine plasma samples taken over a 12 h dosing interval at baseline (BL), after adding indinavir 600 mg twice daily for 10 days (R1), indinavir 800 mg twice daily for 5 days (R2) and lopinavir/ritonavir 533/133 mg plus indinavir 600 mg twice daily for 10 days (R3). Plasma samples were assayed using HPLC. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients completed the BL visit [10 male; mean (SD) age=43.9 (5.8) years] and 9, 7 and 7 completed R1, R2 and R3 visits, respectively. Two subjects discontinued treatment due to hypertriglyceridaemia. Compared with BL, the R3 lopinavir AUC (P<0.05) and Cmin (P=0.0025) were significantly higher and the R2 AUC trended higher (P=0.09). The indinavir AUC (P=0.030) and Cmax (P=0.035) were significantly higher for R2 compared with R1. There was a trend for increased total bilirubin (TB) after the addition of indinavir (P=0.09). Lopinavir and indinavir AUC, Cmax and Cmin were associated with TB during univariate analyses (P<0.01) while only lopinavir AUC (P=0.0004) and indinavir AUC (P=0.0028) were associated with TB during multivariate analysis. Only indinavir AUC was significant when both drugs were included in the model (P=0.0028). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated lopinavir and indinavir concentrations are associated with elevated TB.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Amprenavir-resistant HIV-1 exhibits lopinavir cross-resistance and reduced replication capacity.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate protease inhibitor (PI) cross-resistance and reductions in replication capacity conferred by amprenavir-selected mutations. METHODS: HIV-1IIIB variants derived from passage in increasing concentrations of amprenavir were studied, as well as 3'Gag/protease recombinants derived from them. These strains progressively accumulated mutations at codons 10, 46, 47, 50 and 84 in the protease as well as a p1/p6 cleavage site mutation at codon 449 in Gag. Their susceptibility (IC50) to various PI and their corresponding replication capacities were evaluated by a single-cycle growth assay and compared with measures using competitive cultures and p24 antigen production. RESULTS: Amprenavir susceptibility decreased with increasing numbers of protease mutations. Changes in lopinavir susceptibility paralleled changes in amprenavir susceptibility. Certain amprenavir-selected mutants conferred greater than 10-fold cross-resistance to lopinavir, including PrL10F/M46I/I50V-GagL449F (19-fold) and PrL10F/M46I/I47V/I50V-GagL449F (31-fold). Moreover, one isolate with only two mutations in the protease (L10F/84V) and GagL449F displayed a 7.7-fold increase in lopinavir IC50. Low-level cross-resistance to ritonavir and nelfinavir was also observed. The replication capacity of viruses containing either I84V or I50V was at least 90% lower than the reference virus in the single-cycle assay. The order of relative replication capacity was wild-type > L10F > L10F/I84V > L10F/M46I/I50V > L10F/M46I/I47V/I50V. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that until more comprehensive genotype-phenotype correlations between amprenavir and lopinavir susceptibility are established, phenotypic testing may be preferable to genotyping to detect cross-resistance, and should be considered when switching patients from a failing amprenavir-containing regimen. This study also provides data on the concordance of replication capacity measurements generated using rapid single-cycle growth and competition assays.

Carbamates↗
PubMed2003

Lopinavir: acute exposure inhibits P-glycoprotein; extended exposure induces P-glycoprotein.

The effect of lopinavir on P-glycoprotein-mediated rhodamine 123 efflux was studied in Caco-2 monolayer cells. Lopinavir is a potent inhibitor of Rh123 efflux in Caco-2 monolayers (IC50 1.7 microM). Chronic lopinavir exposure (72 h) in LS 180V cells reduced the content of intracellular Rh123 by approximately 50%, indicating increased efflux activity. In LS 180V cells, lopinavir induced P-glycoprotein immunoreactive protein (up to threefold) and messenger RNA levels in a concentration-dependent fashion.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed2005

No significant influence of saquinavir hard-gel capsule administration on pharmacokinetics of lopinavir in combination with ritonavir: a population approach.

The influence of saquinavir hard-gel capsules on lopinavir pharmacokinetic parameters was investigated using a population approach. Forty-nine patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and treated with lopinavir/ritonavir, nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus saquinavir (group A), and 118 patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir plus nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (group B) were included in the study. No significant relationship was established between the presence or the daily dosage of saquinavir in the treatment and lopinavir population pharmacokinetic parameters. The values (mean+/-standard deviation) of the individual apparent clearance (5.0+/-1.8 vs. 5.0+/-3.2 L/h), volume of distribution (66.6+/-1.6 vs. 66.8+/-1.9 L), absorption rate constant (0.37+/-0.01 vs. 0.37+/-0.03 hours), and trough plasma concentration (5.5+/-2.3 vs. 5.3+/-1.9 mg/L) of lopinavir are not significantly different between groups A and B. This lack of influence of saquinavir on lopinavir pharmacokinetics makes the use of this combination in salvage therapy easier.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

Low initial trough plasma concentrations of lopinavir are associated with an impairment of virological response in an unselected cohort of HIV-1-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: The relationship between lopinavir trough plasma concentration at baseline and virological efficacy 3 months after the beginning of the therapy was investigated in an unselected cohort of HIV-1-infected patients METHODS: According to initial trough lopinavir plasma level, patients were classified into three groups: the subtherapeutic group (<3 mg/L, n=18), the therapeutic group (between 3 and 8 mg/L, n=50) and the toxic group (>8 mg/L, n=16). The virological response after 3 months of lopinavir treatment, defined as a viral load <200 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL, was compared amongst these groups. RESULTS: The virological response was significantly different (P<0.05) between the subtherapeutic group (22.% of patients with viral load<200 copies/mL) and the other groups (56.0% of patients with a viral load<200 copies/mL in the therapeutic group and 56.2% in the toxic group). CONCLUSIONS: A lower virological efficacy should be expected for experienced or naive patients with plasma trough lopinavir concentrations<3 mg/L at the beginning of treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Efficacy and safety of an anti-retroviral combination regimen including either efavirenz or lopinavir-ritonavir with a backbone of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

The efficacy and safety of a combination regimen including either efavirenz or lopinavir-ritonavir was examined in a cohort of 65 patients positive for human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1). Both the efavirenz (n = 33, 18 anti-retroviral naive) and lopinavir-ritonavir (n = 32, 15 naive) regimens achieved significant changes from baseline CD4 cell counts and HIV RNA levels after 108 weeks (p < 0.01). Despite diminished immunological and virological parameters at study entry, the lopinavir-ritonavir group showed greater virological effects than the efavirenz group after 108 weeks (median change 3.3 log(10), interquartile range (IQR) 2.2-3.8 log(10) vs. 2.4 log(10), IQR 0.9-3.3 log(10), respectively, p 0.004). Use of lopinavir-ritonavir, in contrast to use of efavirenz, was associated with significant hypertriglyceridaemia.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Lopinavir-Ritonavir: a new protease inhibitor.

Lopinavir is a new protease inhibitor that is structurally related to ritonavir. It recently was approved by the Food and Drug Administration as a coformulation with ritonavir under the brand name Kaletra. Ritonavir substantially increases lopinavir drug exposure by inhibiting cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 3A4. Based on limited data, lopinavir-ritonavir demonstrates safety and efficacy in both antiretroviral-naive and protease inhibitor-experienced patients. It has the ability to durably suppress human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA for up to 2 years in antiretroviral-naïve patients. Compared with nelfinavir, it had superior virologic control at 48 weeks in antiretroviral-naïve patients. Its side effects include diarrhea, abnormal stools, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and asthenia. A number of patients experienced grade 3-4 laboratory abnormalities in liver function tests, cholesterol, and triglycerides while receiving this drug combination. The exact resistance patterns of lopinavir-ritonavir are unknown, but the Department of Health and Human Services strongly recommends it for the initial treatment of HIV-infected adults and adolescents.

HIV Protease Inhibitors↗