Health literacy: an ethical responsibility. Mitigating the negative impact of low health literacy is an ethical imperative.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Ethics↗
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “Literacy”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Adequate literacy and health literacy: prerequisites for informed health care decision making.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aged↗
Literacy and contraception: exploring the link.
OBJECTIVE: To describe what is known about the relation of literacy skills to contraceptive use and to suggest directions for future research. An overview of what is known about the literacy skills of Americans and the prevalence of inadequate functional health literacy is presented. Information about reading requirements for various methods of contraception and advice from health educators on dealing with low-literate populations are described. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PsychInfo, and ERIC searches for the last 20 years were completed using the terms literacy, literacy and health, family planning, health status, educational status, risk factors, contraception, and pregnancy. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: The primary literature searches identified 125 articles. After reviewing abstracts for these articles, we excluded 79, because they contained no specific mention of literacy or educational status relating to contraception. TABULATION INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: We were unable to identify and study specifically devoted to the relation between functional literacy and actual use of contraceptives. Forty-six with relevant background or related information were identified: literacy and health (19), adult literacy (nine), literacy and contraception (11), and literacy and family planning (seven). Over one-third of English-speaking and 62% of Spanish-speaking patients had inadequate or marginal functional health literacy in a study conducted at two urban public hospitals. Studies by health educators have demonstrated that information for many types of contraceptives is frequently above the patient's reading level. Available epidemiologic information on the relation between educational status and unplanned pregnancy is also presented. CONCLUSIONS: Although no study has specifically addressed how functional health literacy affects contraceptive use, it is reasonable to hypothesize that functional health literacy influences contraceptive knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Future research should focus on the relation between functional health literacy and actual use of various contraceptives.
Adolescent↗
Residents' ability to identify patients with poor literacy skills.
PURPOSE: To determine whether residents could identify patients with poor literacy skills based on clinical interactions during a continuity clinic visit. The authors hypothesized residents would overestimate patients' literacy abilities and fail to recognize many patients at risk for poor literacy. METHOD: The Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Revised (REALM-R) was administered to screen patients for potential literacy problems. Residents were asked "Do you feel this patient has a literacy problem?" and answered yes or no. Continuity adjusted chi-square was used to test for overestimation of literacy abilities by residents. RESULTS: REALM-R scores and residents' evaluations of literacy were available for 182 patients. The residents believed 10% of patients (18) had literacy problems based on their clinical interactions. Only three patients passing the literacy screen were incorrectly identified as at risk for literacy. Of the 90% of patients (164) the residents perceived to have no literacy problem, 36% (59) failed the literacy screen. CONCLUSION: Resident physicians overestimated the literacy abilities of their patients. A significant portion of these residents' patients may not have the skills to effectively interact with the health care system and are at increased risk for adverse outcomes.
Educational Status↗
Health Literacy and Capecitabine Adherence in a Remote Monitoring Pilot Trial for Breast Cancer: Post Hoc Exploratory Analysis.
BACKGROUND: Oral anticancer therapy enables convenient, home-based cancer care but can introduce adherence challenges, particularly with complex dosing schedules. Capecitabine is commonly used in breast cancer, often as adjuvant therapy or in advanced disease, and typically requires twice-daily dosing on cyclical schedules, increasing the risk of missed or incorrect doses. Low health literacy may exacerbate these difficulties, and emerging remote monitoring tools may help close this gap. OBJECTIVE: In this post hoc exploratory analysis, we evaluated whether health literacy (1) was associated with capecitabine adherence and (2) modified a remote monitoring intervention's effectiveness. METHODS: We conducted post hoc analyses of a 2-arm pilot trial that randomized women with breast cancer treated with capecitabine to enhanced usual care (EUC) or remote patient monitoring (RPM). Adherence was captured with a smart pill bottle, Nomi by SMRxT, that recorded dose timing and quantity. Participants in the RPM group received messages for missed or incorrect doses and weekly symptom assessments. Incorrect or missed doses and severe symptoms triggered alerts to the oncologist. Health literacy was assessed at enrollment. To evaluate moderation, we used linear regression with an interaction term (health literacy × intervention arm) predicting adherence (proportion of days). Marginal effects quantified differences in adherence by study arm and health literacy. RESULTS: Among 28 participants (EUC, n=15 and RPM, n=13), 9 (32.1%) had lower health literacy, 16 (57.1%) identified as Black, 10 (35.7%) identified as White, and 15 (53.6%) had income below 200% of the federal poverty level. In the regression model, the health literacy × randomized group interaction did not reach statistical significance (-16.3 percentage points, 95% CI -35.5 to 2.9; P=.09). Predicted adherence among lower health literacy participants was 87.5% in the RPM group and 65.5% in the EUC group (difference: +22.1 percentage points, 95% CI 6.2-37.9; P=.008). Among participants with higher health literacy, adherence was 89.9% in the RPM group and 84.1% in the EUC group (difference: +5.7 percentage points, 95% CI -5.2 to 16.7; P=.29). Within the EUC group, predicted adherence was 18.6 percentage points lower among those with lower versus higher health literacy (95% CI -32.4 to -4.9; P=.01); within the RPM group, this difference was 2.3 percentage points lower among those with lower versus higher health literacy (95% CI -15.8 to 11.1; P=.73). CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc exploratory analysis, the estimated difference in capecitabine adherence between the RPM and EUC groups was larger among participants with lower health literacy. Although the formal interaction test was not statistically significant, the magnitude and direction of the observed difference support further investigation of RPM as a potential approach to improve adherence among patients facing health literacy-related adherence barriers. Larger, prospectively powered studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate downstream clinical outcomes.
Humans↗
Health literacy, social support, and health: a research agenda.
Amid increased concerns about the adverse consequences of low health literacy, it remains unclear how health literacy affects health status and health service utilization. Moreover, studies have shown significant variation in individual adaptation to health literacy problems. This article proposes research hypotheses to address two questions: (1) What are the causal pathways or intermediate steps that link low health literacy to poor health status and high utilization of expensive services such as hospitalization and emergency care? (2) What impact does social support have on the relationships between health literacy and health service utilization? Empirical studies of health literacy are reviewed to indicate the limitations of current literature and to highlight the importance of the proposed research agenda. In particular, we note the individualistic premise of current literature in which individuals are treated as isolated and passive actors. Thus, low health literacy is considered simply as an individual trait independent of support and resources in an individual's social environment. To remedy this, research needs to take into account social support that people can draw on when problems arise due to their health literacy limitations. Examination of the proposed agenda will make two main contributions. First, we will gain a better understanding of the causal effects of health literacy and identify missing links in the delivery of care for patients with low health literacy. Second, if social support buffers the adverse effects of low health literacy, more effective interventions can be designed to address differences in individuals' social support system in addition to individual differences in reading and comprehension. More targeted and more cost-efficient efforts could also be taken to identify and reach those who not only have low health literacy but also lack the resources and support to bridge the unmet literacy demands of their health conditions.
Female↗
Health literacy: concept analysis.
AIM: This paper reports an analysis of the concept of health literacy in order to clarify its meaning, reduce ambiguities associated with references to it, and promote consistency in using the concept in nursing dialogue and research. BACKGROUND: Health literacy is a relatively new concept in health promotion research. Only within the last decade have researchers identified the problems associated with health literacy, the role it plays in an individual's ability to comprehend health and self-care information, and its relationship to health outcomes. Clarifying the concept is essential so that nurses develop an awareness of the phenomenon and its relationship to the outcomes of their communication and health education efforts. METHOD: The method used for this concept analysis was that of Walker and Avant (1995). FINDINGS: Health literacy empowers people to act appropriately in new and changing health-related circumstances through the use of advanced cognitive and social skills. The defining attributes of health literacy are reading and numeracy skills, comprehension, the capacity to use information in health care decision-making, and successful functioning as a healthcare consumer. Antecedents of health literacy are literacy and a health-related experience. Consequences of health literacy include improved self-reported health status, lower health care costs, increased health knowledge, shorter hospitalizations, and less frequent use of health care services. Empirical referents of the concept are the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults and the health literacy component of the National Assessment of Adult Literacy. CONCLUSIONS: An analysis of the concept of health literacy enhances nurses' ability to assess more accurately their clients' levels of health literacy, thus identifying those at risk for misunderstanding health care instructions, shame associated with inadequate reading skills, and inability to adhere to health care recommendations.
Adult↗
Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: No practical method for identifying patients with low heath literacy exists. We sought to develop screening questions for identifying patients with inadequate or marginal health literacy. METHODS: Patients (n=332) at a VA preoperative clinic completed in-person interviews that included 16 health literacy screening questions on a 5-point Likert scale, followed by a validated health literacy measure, the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (STOHFLA). Based on the STOFHLA, patients were classified as having either inadequate, marginal, or adequate health literacy. Each of the 16 screening questions was evaluated and compared to two comparison standards: (1) inadequate health literacy and (2) inadequate or marginal health literacy on the STOHFLA. RESULTS: Fifteen participants (4.5%) had inadequate health literacy and 25 (7.5%) had marginal health literacy on the STOHFLA. Three of the screening questions, "How often do you have someone help you read hospital materials?" "How confident are you filling out medical forms by yourself?" and "How often do you have problems learning about your medical condition because of difficulty understanding written information?" were effective in detecting inadequate health literacy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87, 0.80, and 0.76, respectively). These questions were weaker for identifying patients with marginal health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: Three questions were each effective screening tests for inadequate health literacy in this population.
Adult↗
Influence of patient literacy on the effectiveness of a primary care-based diabetes disease management program.
CONTEXT: Low literacy is an important barrier for patients with diabetes, but interventions to address low literacy have not been well examined. OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of literacy on the effectiveness of a comprehensive disease management program for patients with diabetes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of the influence of literacy on glycemic control and systolic blood pressure using data from a randomized controlled trial (conducted from February 2001 through April 2003) of a comprehensive diabetes management program. Participants were 217 patients aged 18 years or older with type 2 diabetes and poor glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c] levels > or =8.0%) and presenting to a US academic general internal medicine practice. INTERVENTIONS: All communication to patients was individualized and delivered to enhance comprehension among patients with low literacy. Intervention patients received intensive disease management from a multidisciplinary team. Control patients received an initial management session and continued with usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Achievement of goal HbA1c levels and systolic blood pressure at 12-month follow-up for control and intervention patients stratified by literacy status. RESULTS: Complete 12-month data were available for 193 patients (89%). Among patients with low literacy, intervention patients were more likely than control patients to achieve goal HbA1c levels (< or =7.0%) (42% vs 15%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 4.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 17.2; P = .02). Patients with higher literacy had similar odds of achieving goal HbA1c levels regardless of intervention status (24% vs 23%; adjusted OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.5; P = .98). Improvements in systolic blood pressure were similar by literacy status. CONCLUSIONS: Literacy may be an important factor for predicting who will benefit from an intervention for diabetes management. A diabetes disease management program that addresses literacy may be particularly beneficial for patients with low literacy, and increasing access to such a program could help reduce health disparities.
Academic Medical Centers↗
The impact of literacy on health-related quality of life measurement and outcomes in cancer outpatients.
BACKGROUND: Limited evidence exists regarding the relationship between literacy and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Research is needed to develop measurement techniques for low literacy populations and to evaluate potential literacy-related measurement bias. METHODS: A Talking Touchscreen (TT) was developed for an HRQL study. Low (n = 214) and high literacy (n = 201) adult cancer outpatients participated, 70% of whom were from racial/ethnic minorities. Patients completed three questionnaires by TT: FACT-G (cancer-specific), SF-36 (generic health status), and a standard gamble utility questionnaire. Measurement bias was evaluated using item response theory (IRT). Effects of literacy on HRQL were evaluated using regression models. RESULTS: Most (97%) patients rated the TT easy to use. In IRT analysis, 6/27 FACT-G and 12/31 SF-36 items demonstrated literacy bias; this was relatively balanced (10 items 'biased against' low literacy; 8 'biased against' high literacy). Mean literacy group differences were statistically and clinically non-significant for 9/14 HRQL outcomes. Adjustment for bias and/or covariates eliminated most remaining differences. CONCLUSIONS: The TT is valid and useful for HRQL assessment in low literacy populations. There appears to be no systematic literacy bias in reporting HRQL, and low literacy is not an independent risk factor for poorer HRQL.
Cancer Care Facilities↗
Health literacy: addressing the health and education divide.
Health literacy as a discrete form of literacy is becoming increasingly important for social, economic and health development. The positive and multiplier effects of education and general literacy on population health, particularly women's health, are well known and researched. However, a closer analysis of the current HIV/AIDS epidemics, especially in Africa, indicates a complex interface between general literacy and health literacy. While general literacy is an important determinant of health, it is not sufficient to address the major health challenges facing developing and developed societies. As a contribution to the health literacy forum in Health Promotion International, this paper reviews concepts and definitions of literacy and health literacy, and raises conceptual, measurement and strategic challenges. It proposes to develop a set of indicators to quantify health literacy using the experience gained in national literacy surveys around the world. A health literacy index could become an important composite measure of the outcome of health promotion and prevention activities, could document the health competence and capabilities of the population of a given country, community or group and relate it to a set of health, social and economic outcomes.
Community Health Planning↗
Health literacy weakly but consistently predicts primary care patient dissatisfaction.
OBJECTIVES: To study relationships between health literacy and multiple satisfaction domains. Health literacy is related to some domains of patient satisfaction such as communication and understanding, but little is known about relationships of health literacy with other satisfaction domains. Moreover, the importance of health literacy in predicting satisfaction compared with other patient sociodemographics is underexplored. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Primary care waiting areas with a Veterans Administration Medical Center and a university health system. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand five hundred and twenty-eight primary care patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A brief demographics questionnaire, the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine, the Veterans Affairs ambulatory care patient satisfaction survey, and an adaptation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: In unadjusted regression analyses, lower health literacy level was a significant predictor of worse satisfaction in 7 of 10 domains (P < 0.01). When adjusting for patient sociodemographics, predicted relationships remained significant in six of the seven domains (P < 0.05), with each unit change in the 4-stage literacy classification associated with a 3-6 point decrease in dissatisfaction scores (0-100 scale). Health literacy did not predict overall dissatisfaction (P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that health literacy, as assessed through a pronunciation exercise that is closely related to more comprehensive measures of literacy, has a consistent, albeit weak relationship with patient satisfaction. Future work is needed to clarify if patients with lower literacy are really receiving different care than those with higher literacy and to pinpoint the sources of their more negative responses.
Adult↗
Health literacy and use of outpatient physician services by Medicare managed care enrollees.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether inadequate functional health literacy adversely affects use of physician outpatient services. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: New Medicare managed care enrollees age 65 or older in 4 U.S. cities (N = 3,260). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured functional health literacy using the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults. Administrative data were used to determine the time to first physician visit and the total number of visits during the 12 months after enrollment. The time until first visit, the proportion without any visit, and adjusted mean visits during the year after enrollment were unrelated to health literacy in crude and multivariate analyses. Participants with inadequate and marginal health literacy were more likely to have an emergency department (ED) visit than those with adequate health literacy (30.4%, 27.6%, and 21.8%, respectively; P =.01 and P <.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the adjusted relative risk of having 2 or more ED visits was 1.44 (95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 2.02) for enrollees with marginal health literacy and 1.34 (1.00 to 1.79) for those with inadequate health literacy compared to participants with adequate health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate health literacy was not independently associated with the mean number of visits or the time to a first visit. This suggests that inadequate literacy is not a major barrier to accessing outpatient health care. Nevertheless, the higher rates of ED use by persons with low literacy may be caused by real or perceived barriers to using their usual source of outpatient care.
Aged↗
Impact of health literacy on depressive symptoms and mental health-related: quality of life among adults with addiction.
BACKGROUND: Health literacy has been linked to health status in a variety of chronic diseases. However, evidence for a relationship between health literacy and mental health outcomes is sparse. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that low literacy would be associated with higher addiction severity, higher levels of depressive symptoms, and worse mental health functioning compared with those with higher literacy in adults with alcohol and drug dependence. METHODS: The association of literacy with multiple mental health outcomes was assessed using multivariable analyses. Measurement instruments included the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM), the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale, the Mental Component Summary scale of the Short Form Health Survey, and the Addiction Severity Index for drug and alcohol addiction. Subjects included 380 adults recruited during detoxification treatment and followed prospectively at 6-month intervals for 2 years. Based on the REALM, subjects were classified as having either low (< or = 8th grade) or higher (> or = 9th grade) literacy levels. RESULTS: In longitudinal analyses, low literacy was associated with more depressive symptoms. The adjusted mean difference in CES-D scores between low and high literacy levels was 4 (P<.01). Literacy was not significantly associated with mental health-related quality of life or addiction severity. CONCLUSIONS: In people with alcohol and drug dependence, low literacy is associated with worse depressive symptoms. The mechanisms underlying the relationship between literacy and mental health outcomes should be explored to inform future intervention efforts.
Adult↗
Health literacy as a predictor of follow-up after an abnormal Pap smear: a prospective study.
BACKGROUND: Low literacy influences cervical cancer screening knowledge, and is a possible contributor to racial disparities in cervical cancer. OBJECTIVE: To examine the hypothesis that literacy predicts patient adherence to follow-up recommendations after an abnormal Pap smear. DESIGN: A prospective, continuity clinic-based study. PARTICIPANTS: From a sample of 538 women undergoing literacy testing at the time of Pap smear screening, we studied 68 women with abnormal Pap smear diagnoses. MEASUREMENTS: Literacy was assessed using the Rapid Evaluation of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM). We also measured other proxies for literacy, including educational attainment and physician estimates of patients' literacy level. Outcome measures included on-time and 1-year follow-up and duration of time to follow-up after an abnormal Pap smear. RESULTS: Only one-third of the cohort adhered to follow-up recommendations. At 1 year, 25% of the women had not returned at all. Patients with inadequate literacy (as assessed by the REALM) were less likely to follow up within 1 year, although this result was not statistically significant (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8 to 17.4). Patients subjectively assessed by their physician to have low literacy skills were significantly less likely to follow up within 1 year (adjusted OR=14, 95% CI: 3 to 65). Less than high school education (hazard ratio (HR)= 2.3; 95% CI: 1.2, 4.6) and low physician-estimated literacy level (HR=3.4, 95% CI: 1.4, 8.2), but not objective literacy level, were significant predictors of duration of time to follow-up, adjusting for recommended days to follow-up and other factors. CONCLUSIONS: Among women with an abnormal Pap smear, those perceived by their physician to have low literacy were significantly more likely to fail to present for follow-up.
Adolescent↗
Limited literacy and mortality in the elderly: the health, aging, and body composition study.
BACKGROUND: While limited literacy is common and its prevalence increases with age, no prospective study has assessed whether limited literacy is associated with mortality in older adults. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of limited literacy with mortality. DESIGN AND SETTING: Five-year prospective study from 1999 to 2004 of community-dwelling elders from Memphis, TN, and Pittsburgh, PA, who were from the Health, Aging, and Body Composition study. Subjects' literacy was assessed with the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine. Scores were categorized into limited (0 to 8th grade reading level) or adequate literacy (> or = 9th grade reading level). PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand five hundred and twelve black and white elders without baseline functional difficulties or dementia. MEASUREMENTS: Time to death. RESULTS: Participants' mean age was 75.6 years, 48% were male, 38% were black, and 24% had limited literacy; the median follow-up time was 4.2 years. Compared with those with adequate literacy, those with limited literacy had a higher risk of death (19.7% vs 10.6%) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.03 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.62 to 2.55). After adjusting for demographics and socioeconomic status, co-morbid conditions, self-rated health status, health-related behaviors, health care access measures, and psychosocial status, limited literacy remained independently associated with mortality (HR 1.75; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.41). CONCLUSIONS: Limited literacy is independently associated with a nearly 2-fold increase in mortality in the elderly. Given the growth of the aging population and the prevalence of chronic diseases, the mechanisms by which limited literacy is associated with mortality in the elderly warrant further investigation.
Aged↗
Health literacy: universal precautions needed.
Inadequate health literacy adversely affects health care outcomes and the quality of life of 90 million Americans and costs the health care system dollars 73 billion annually. Current strategies addressing inadequate health literacy primarily target physicians, nurses, and pharmacists but omit the allied health practitioners responsible for providing most patient services. The 2003 Coalition for Allied Health Leadership Health Literacy Project team undertook a survey of allied health professionals and educators to assess their awareness and needs concerning inadequate health literacy. Less than one third of all respondents were aware of the issues surrounding health literacy or that health literacy resources are available or had institutional policy or goals to address health literacy. Brochures and videos were identified most frequently as new resources needed to establish or increase the effectiveness of health literacy awareness programs. The results of this project indicated that there is substantial opportunity to increase awareness of the impact of health literacy, to develop and assess institutional policies toward health literacy, and to create new resources to promote health literacy within the allied health professions. Any approach to improving health literacy must be universal by involving all health care professionals and all patients in the intervention.
Allied Health Occupations↗
Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes.
CONTEXT: Health literacy is a measure of patients' ability to read, comprehend, and act on medical instructions. Poor health literacy is common among racial and ethnic minorities, elderly persons, and patients with chronic conditions, particularly in public-sector settings. Little is known about the extent to which health literacy affects clinical health outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between health literacy and diabetes outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional observational study of 408 English- and Spanish-speaking patients who were older than 30 years and had type 2 diabetes identified from the clinical database of 2 primary care clinics of a university-affiliated public hospital in San Francisco, Calif. Participants were enrolled and completed questionnaires between June and December 2000. We assessed patients' health literacy by using the short-form Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (s-TOFHLA) in English or Spanish. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Most recent hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) level. Patients were classified as having tight glycemic control if their HbA(1c) was in the lowest quartile and poor control if it was in the highest quartile. We also measured the presence of self-reported diabetes complications. RESULTS: After adjusting for patients' sociodemographic characteristics, depressive symptoms, social support, treatment regimen, and years with diabetes, for each 1-point decrement in s-TOFHLA score, the HbA(1c) value increased by 0.02 (P =.02). Patients with inadequate health literacy were less likely than patients with adequate health literacy to achieve tight glycemic control (HbA(1c) < or = 7.2%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-1.00; P =.05) and were more likely to have poor glycemic control (HbA(1c) > or = 9.5%; adjusted OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.11-3.73; P =.02) and to report having retinopathy (adjusted OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.19-4.57; P =.01). CONCLUSIONS: Among primary care patients with type 2 diabetes, inadequate health literacy is independently associated with worse glycemic control and higher rates of retinopathy. Inadequate health literacy may contribute to the disproportionate burden of diabetes-related problems among disadvantaged populations. Efforts should focus on developing and evaluating interventions to improve diabetes outcomes among patients with inadequate health literacy.
Blood Glucose↗