SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Better classification of headache disorders enables better headache research, understanding of headache, communication, and, ultimately, management of a set of disabling neurological disorders.
Head, neck, and facial pain disorders possess characteristic features that, in some ways, distinguish them from other painful disorders. Generally speaking, the headache disorders can be reconciled within the same model of assessment as that of other painful conditions.
Clinical data and experience to date have demonstrated that BoNT-A is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for the prevention of migraine and other headache disorders. It has a long duration of action that may last over 4 months with no systemic or serious AEs. Several issues remain to be defined, however, including dosing, location, and number of injections; optimal dilution of BoNT-A; specific headache types that respond best to BoNT-A; and long-term efficacy and safety. Data from ongoing well-designed trials that include a larger patient population investigating these issues may confirm a role for BoNT-A as a first-line agent for migraine prevention. Neurotoxin therapy is part of a broader headache management approach. Because the injection techniques for headache are unique and vary depending on the primary headache disorder being treated and the location and pattern of pain referral, the use of BoNT-A for headache is not simply an extension of its use for cosmesis. The use of BoNT-A in the overall management of primary headache disorders should be reserved for medical practitioners who not only have experience with BoNT-A injections, but possess the expertise in the diagnosis and management of complex headache disorders. Educating patients and addressing headache triggers and optimizing acute treatment improve the outcome of any preventive program.
The classification and diagnostic criteria of the primary headaches--migraine, tension-type headache, and cluster headache--have been reviewed. Additional features of these conditions may enhance diagnostic accuracy. Modification of the classification and diagnostic criteria will take place as epidemiologic and pathophysiologic data continue to develop.
Over a six month period, 22% of patients with headache seen in general neurology outpatient clinics reported prior attendance at an emergency department because of their headache; 9% of the headache cohort had been admitted to hospital. All had primary headache disorders according to International Headache Society diagnostic criteria. Improved primary care services for headache patients are required to reduce the burden of primary headache disorders seen in emergency departments.
Several epidemiological studies have shown the presence of comorbidity between various types of sleep disorders and different headache subtypes. Migraine without aura is a sensitive risk factor for disorders of initiating and maintaining sleep (odds ratio (OR) 8.2500), and chronic tension-type headache for sleep breathing disorders (OR 15.231), but headache disorder is a cumulative risk factor for disorders of excessive somnolence (OR 15.061). This result has not been reported in the clinical literature.
Recent studies indicate that aerobic activities might reduce severity and/or frequency of migraine attacks. The present study was intended to investigate whether physical activities and fitness (aerobic endurance, flexibility, and muscle strength endurance) as well as body composition are different in patients with headache disorders and healthy control subjects. The study included 56 patients (aged 17-64 years) with headache disorders (migraine, tension-type, cluster, analgetics abuse, and other types of headache) and 145 age-matched volunteers without history of recurrent or chronic headache. A standardized questionnaire revealed similar self-esteem of physical activities in both groups. Objective physical fitness testing in a representative sample of 22 patients and 36 control subjects showed significantly reduced aerobic endurance in female and male patients as well as reduced flexibility in female patients as compared to control subjects, whereas muscle strength endurance was not significantly different between both groups. Female patients presented with a significantly higher total body fat as compared to control subjects. In conclusion, headache patients turned out to be less physically fit than control subjects. There was a discrepancy between self-esteem and objective test results regarding physical activity and fitness in patients with headache disorders.
It has been almost 15 years since the first edition of the International Headache Classification appeared in 1988. It was widely accepted and well tolerated. However, rapid progress of the headache research is pushing for a drastic revision of the classification. The new International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-II) was disclosed in September 2003 as a preprinted version and formally published in January 2004. The ICDH-II classifies headache disorders into 3 parts: the primary headache, the secondary headache and cranial neuralgia, central and primary facial pain and other headaches. Basically, the most important diagnostic criteria, those of migraine and tension-type headache, remain unchanged. Several new entities such as chronic migraine, hypnic headache, hemicrania continua, benign thunderclap headache and medication overuse headache have been added. This will encourage intensified headache researches in the future.
The International Classification of Headache Disorders, second edition (ICHD-II) was the result of 4 years' work by a large number of headache experts from different parts of the world. This article summarizes the main new features of ICHD-II, compared with the original International Headache Society classification: better definition of migraine with aura, inclusion of chronic migraine, inclusion of a number of new primary headaches (SUNCT, hypnic headache, benign thunderclap headache, new daily-persistent headache, hemicrania continua), better definition of the secondary headaches, introduction of medication-overuse headache and of headache attributed to psychiatric disorder. An appendix defines a number of entities for research purposes. The new classification has already been translated into many of the world's major languages and many more are in the pipeline. It is enormously important that headache experts support and encourage the use of the new classification in order to develop a common knowledge base, and that they research ways of further improving it.
This overview of the published epidemiological evidence of migraine helps to identify the size of the public-health problem that migraine represents. It also highlights the need for further epidemiological studies in many parts of the world to gain full understanding of the scale of clinical, economic and humanistic burdens attributable to it. This paper presents some of the work on migraine undertaken by the World Health Organization (WHO) in the Global Burden of Disease study conducted in 2000 and reported in the World Health Report 2001. Migraine was not included in the first Global Burden of Disease 1990. The paper also discussed the measurement of disability attributable to headache disorders using WHO ICF Classification. Using disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) as a summary measure of population health (which adds disability to mortality), WHO have shown that mental and neurological disorders collectively account for 30.8% of all years of healthy life lost to disability (YLDs) whilst migraine, one amongst these, alone accounts for 1.4% and is in the top 20 causes of disability worldwide. This information is combined with the increasingly widely accepted belief that disability and functioning are relevant parameters for monitoring the health of nations and that there is an increasing need to measure them. WHO's Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) provides a model of human functioning and disability, as well as a classification system, that allows us to highlight and measure all dimensions of disability. ICF applied to headache disorders allows comparability with other health conditions as well as evaluation of the role of the environment as a cause of disability amongst people with headache. Migraine causes a large proportion of the non-fatal disease-related burden worldwide. Our knowledge of headache related burden is incomplete and it is necessary to add to it epidemiological studies in many parts of the world and to combine this with measurements of disability using both DALYs and WHO's ICF Classification. The work described here has been the base for the Global Campaign against Headache disorders: "Lifting the Burden", launched in 2004 jointly by WHO, IHS (International Headache Society), WHA (World Headache Alliance) and EHF (European Headache Federation).
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Reports and studies on botulinum toxin A in headache treatment are increasing. The studies available from reference systems and published congress contributions on the prophylactic treatment of idiopathic and symptomatic headache with botulinum toxin were analyzed with respect to the study design, the headache diagnosis, and the significance of results. RECENT FINDINGS: For the prophylactic treatment of tension-type headache and migraine, no sufficient positive evidence for a treatment with botulinum toxin A is obtained from randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trials to date. For the treatment of chronic daily headache (including medication overuse headache), there is inconsistent positive evidence for subgroups (e.g. patients without other prophylactic treatment). SUMMARY: The majority of double-blind and placebo-controlled studies do not confirm the assumption that botulinum toxin A is efficacious in the treatment of idiopathic headache disorders. It is possible that subgroups of patients with chronic daily headache benefit from a long-term treatment with this substance. Future clinical trials should focus on these defined patient groups.
The universally accepted international classification of headache disorders, first published in 1988, has now been replaced by a second edition ICDH-2. It is important to implement the new edition immediately since there are many important changes compared with the first edition. Application of the new edition is the only way to assure that the same diagnostic approach and appropriate treatment are provided for all headache patients.
The objective of this study was to compare the exteroceptive suppression patterns of masseter and temporalis muscles in patients with primary and secondary headache disorders originating from peripheral joint dysfunction. We accomplished the temporalis and masseter exteroceptive suppression in 28 patients with migraine, 25 patients with chronic tension-type headache (CTH), 22 patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dysfunction and 18 healthy controls. The onset latencies and duration of the first suppression period (S1) was not significantly different between the patients and controls. The duration of the second suppression period (S2) was shorter in patients with CTH, migraine (analysed during attack) and TMJ dysfunction than those obtained from controls. A distinctive finding was significantly prolonged onset latency in patients with TMJ over those obtained from patients with CTH and migraine. We concluded that the onset latency of the S2 period is a useful parameter in the differential diagnosis of primary and peripheral headache disorders.
There is now evidence that melatonin may have a role in the biological regulation of circadian rhythms, sleep, mood, and ageing. Altered melatonin levels in cluster headache and migraine have been documented. Melatonin mechanisms are related to headache pathophysiology in many ways, including its anti-inflammatory effect, toxic free radical scavenging, reduction of proinflammatory cytokine up-regulation, nitric oxide synthase activity and dopamine release inhibition, membrane stabilization, GABA and opioid analgesia potentiation, glutamate neurotoxicity protection, neurovascular regulation, serotonin modulation, and the similarity of chemical structure to that of indomethacin. Treatment of headache disorders with melatonin and other chronobiotic agents is promising. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial shows melatonin is effective in cluster headache prevention, other studies also show benefit in other disorders. Melatonin plays an important role in headache disorders, offering new avenues for studying their pathophysiology and treatment.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of a policy of using acupuncture, compared with a policy of avoiding acupuncture, on headache in primary care patients with chronic headache disorders. The effects of acupuncture on medication use, quality of life, resource use and days off sick in this population and the cost-effectiveness of acupuncture were also examined. DESIGN: Randomised, controlled trial. SETTING: General practices in England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 401 patients with chronic headache disorder, predominantly migraine. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to receive up to 12 acupuncture treatments over 3 months or to a control intervention offering usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included headache score; assessment of Short Form 36 (SF-36) health status and use of medication at baseline, 3 months and 12 months; assessment of use of resources every 3 months; and assessment of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: Headache score at 12 months, the primary end-point, was lower in the acupuncture group than in controls. The adjusted difference between means was 4.6. This result was robust to sensitivity analysis incorporating imputation for missing data. Patients in the acupuncture group experienced the equivalent of 22 fewer days of headache per year. SF-36 data favoured acupuncture, although differences reached significance only for physical role functioning, energy and change in health. Compared with controls, patients randomised to acupuncture used 15% less medication, made 25% fewer visits to GPs and took 15% fewer days off sick. Total costs during the 1-year period of the study were on average higher for the acupuncture group than for controls because of the acupuncture practitioners' costs. The mean health gain from acupuncture during the year of the trial was 0.021 QALYs, leading to a base-case estimate of GBP9180 per QALY gained. This result was robust to sensitivity analysis. Cost per QALY dropped substantially when the analysis incorporated likely QALY differences for the years after the trial. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that acupuncture leads to persisting, clinically relevant benefits for primary care patients with chronic headache, particularly migraine. It is relatively cost-effective compared with a number of other interventions provided by the NHS. Further studies could examine the duration of acupuncture effects beyond 1 year and the relative benefit to patients with migraine with compared to tension-type headache. Trials are also warranted examining the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of acupuncture in patients with headache receiving more aggressive pharmacological management.
For 20 years botulinum toxin A has been used for the treatment of a variety of disorders characterised by pathologically increased muscle contraction. Recently, treatment of tension headache, migraine, cluster headache, and myofascial pain syndromes of neck, shoulder girdle, and back with botulinum toxin A has become a rapidly expanding new field of research. Several modes of action are discussed for these indications. The blockade of cholinergic innervation reduces muscular hyperactivity for 3 to 6 months. Degenerative changes in the musculoskeletal system of the head and neck are prevented. Nociceptive afferences and blood vessels of the pericranial muscles are decompressed and muscular trigger points and tender points are resolved. The normalisation of muscle spindle activity leads to a normalisation of muscle tone and central control mechanisms of muscle activity. Oromandibular dysfunction is eliminated and muscular stress removed. However, the effect of botulinum toxin A cannot be explained by muscular actions only. Its retrograde uptake into the central nervous system modulates the expression of substance P and enkephalins in the spinal cord and nucleus raphe. Recent findings suggest an inhibition of sterile inflammation which may lead to a blockade of the neurogenic inflammation believed to be the pathophysiological substrate of primary headache disorders. The efficacy of botulinum toxin A in the treatment of pain disorders is being investigated in several studies at the moment. The results and experiences obtained so far present new alternatives in the treatment of chronic pain disorders. The practical use of botulinum toxin A is demonstrated.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous valproate in managing moderate to severe headaches. BACKGROUND: Despite major strides in the understanding of primary headache disorders, there have been few additions to acute headache management other than introduction of the triptans. An intravenous antiepileptic preparation, sodium valproate, has been reported to be effective in the management of status epilepticus and acute headache. METHODS: Between March 13, 2000 and October 11, 2000, we prospectively treated, in a nonrandomized and open-label study, every patient with a moderate to severe headache (4 or greater on a visual analog scale of head pain from 1 to 10) who wanted treatment with intravenous valproate. Using a verbal visual analog scale for pain (0 = no headache and 10 = most severe headache), we measured head pain before treatment and at time of discharge. The treating nurse monitored vital signs and side effects. A positive response was defined as a 50% or greater reduction at discharge in baseline pain. Information was collected regarding patient demographics, type of headache (according to criteria of the International Headache Society and that recently proposed for chronic headache), observation time in the treatment suite, cumulative dose of valproate, and use of concurrent medications. Univariable and multivariable correlates of response to treatment were identified using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: One hundred thirty treatments were given to 89 women and 17 men, aged 17 to 76 years; 92 patients received only one treatment. Valproate doses ranged between 300 and 1200 mg. Thirty-three patients (31%) presented with episodic migraine, with or without aura; 45 patients (42%) presented with chronic daily headache with a history of episodic migraine, with or without aura (transformed migraine); 22 (21%) with unclassifiable chronic headache; 2 (2%) with episodic cluster headache; and 4 (4%) with chronic tension-type headache. For first treatments only, 61 patients (57.5%) responded to treatment, whereas for all treatments, 82 patients (63.1%) responded. Age and gender did not affect likelihood of response, whereas increasing duration of treatment (P=.003) and the additional use of analgesics (P=.021) were each negatively associated with response. Among headache types, unclassifiable chronic headache segregated from all other classified headaches in terms of poor response. Aside from rare dizziness (n = 2) and one spell interpreted as a pseudoseizure, no side effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous valproate is a safe, rapidly effective, abortive headache agent. It appears to be an effective analgesic for identifiable primary headaches, especially episodic headache, and less effective for unclassifiable chronic headache. Randomized, double-blind, controlled studies are warranted.