Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “HYSTERECTOMY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Randomized comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outpatient laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard outpatient vaginal hysterectomy. METHODS: Fifty-six women scheduled for vaginal hysterectomy were randomly assigned to undergo either a laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with endoscopic staples (N = 29) or a standard vaginal hysterectomy (N = 27). There were no differences between the study groups with regard to age, gravidity, parity, preoperative indications, and previous operations. RESULTS: Twenty-eight of 29 laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomies and all 27 vaginal hysterectomies were completed without incident. When indicated, unilateral or bilateral oophorectomies were completed. The mean operating time was significantly longer for laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (120.1 versus 64.7 minutes). Fifty-three of the 55 patients completing surgery were discharged home by 12 hours from the time of admission. Complications with laparoscopic hysterectomy were related to the technical aspects of laparoscopy. The incidence of febrile morbidity was similar in the groups. Although patients having laparoscopy-assisted hysterectomy required statistically significantly more pain medication and had lower postoperative hematocrit measurements, this did not make a clinical difference in the postoperative courses. The mean hospital charge for laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy was $7905 and for vaginal hysterectomy $4891. CONCLUSION: Other than cost, laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and standard vaginal hysterectomy appear comparable in patients who could otherwise undergo a vaginal hysterectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Pre-operative GnRH analogue therapy before hysterectomy or myomectomy for uterine fibroids.

BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids, smooth muscle tumours of the uterus, are found in at least 25 to 35% of women over the age of 35 years. Although some of these tumours are asymptomatic, up to 50% cause symptoms severe enough to warrant therapy and surgery is the standard treatment. Fibroid growth is stimulated by oestrogen and gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) which induce a state of hypoestrogenism have been investigated as a potential treatment. GnRHa treatment causes fibroids to shrink but cannot be used long term because of unacceptable symptoms and bone loss. Therefore, GnRHa may be useful pre-operatively both to reduce fibroid and uterine volume and control bleeding. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to evaluate the role of pre-treatment with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues prior to a major surgical procedure, either hysterectomy or myomectomy, for uterine fibroids. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches for relevant randomised controlled trials of the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Register of Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychLIT, Current Contents, Biological Abstracts, Social Sciences Index and CINAHL were performed. Attempts were also made to identify trials from citation lists of review articles. In most cases, the first author of each included trial was contacted for additional information. SELECTION CRITERIA: The inclusion criteria were randomised comparisons of GnRH analogue treatment versus placebo, no treatment, or other medical therapy prior to surgery, either myomectomy or hysterectomy, for uterine fibroids. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Nineteen RCTs were identified that fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this review. The reviewers extracted the data independently and odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes were estimated from the data of twelve trials where GnRH analogue treatment was compared with no pre-treatment and five trials where GnRH analogue treatment was compared with placebo (two trials are awaiting assessment). No RCTs of GnRH analogue treatment versus other medical therapy were identified. Results from pre-operative outcomes were combined for both types of surgery but results from intra- and post-operative outcomes were reported separately for myomectomy and hysterectomy. Subgroup analysis was performed according to type of control group, no pre-treatment or placebo, and for some outcomes there were additional subgroup analyses according to size of the uterus in gestational weeks. MAIN RESULTS: Pre- and post-operative haemoglobin (Hb) and haematocrit (HCT) were significantly improved by GnRH analogue therapy prior to surgery, and uterine volume, uterine gestational size and fibroid volume were all reduced. Pelvic symptoms were also reduced but some adverse events were more likely during GnRH analogue therapy. Hysterectomy appeared to be easier after pre-treatment with GnRH analogue therapy; there was reduced operating time and a greater proportion of hysterectomy patients were able to have a vaginal rather than an abdominal procedure. Duration of hospital stay was also reduced. Blood loss and rate of vertical incisions were reduced for both myomectomy and hysterectomy. Evidence of increased risk of fibroid recurrence after GnRH analogue pre-treatment in myomectomy patients was equivocal and no data were available to assess change in post-operative fertility. The increased costs associated with GnRH analogue therapy were not assessed. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The use of GnRH analogues for 3 to 4 months prior to fibroid surgery reduce both uterine volume and fibroid size. They are beneficial in the correction of pre-operative iron deficiency anaemia, if present, and reduce intra-operative blood loss. If uterine size is such that a mid-line incision is planned, this can be avoided in many women with the use of GnRH analogues. For patients undergoing hysterectomy, a vaginal procedure is more like

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed1999

Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: We compared operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative recovery, return to work, and costs for women undergoing laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy or abdominal hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (n = 24) versus abdominal hysterectomy (n = 24) was carried out in a tertiary care setting. The main outcome variables were operative time, length of hospital stay, and return to work. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain and return to normal activity as determined by weekly visual analog scales and daily diary. Hospital costs were calculated. RESULTS: The laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy group had longer operative times (median and quartiles, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy 180 [139, 225] minutes vs abdominal hysterectomy 130 [97, 155] minutes), lower requirements for postoperative intravenous analgesia (patient-controlled analgesia pump, median and quartiles: laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy 22.1 [15.9, 23.5] hours, abdominal hysterectomy 36.7 [26.2, 45.0] hours), shorter length of hospital stay (median and quartiles, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy 1.5 [1.0, 2.3] days, abdominal hysterectomy 2.5 [1.5, 2.5] days), and quicker return to work (Kaplan-Meier analysis, P =.03). Both procedures had similar hospital costs (P =.21). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy appears to allow patients a more rapid postoperative recovery and an earlier return to work with hospital costs similar to those of abdominal hysterectomy.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy compared with abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy in a primary care hospital setting.

OBJECTIVE: This study compares the operative parameters of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total vaginal hysterectomy, and total abdominal hysterectomy in patients in a small suburban medical center. METHODS: This investigation is a Canadian Classification II-2. It was performed in a 238 bed not-for-profit community general hospital. Charts of 117 patients were reviewed. These patients had undergone the following procedures: laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total vaginal hysterectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy; questionnaires completed by the patients were reviewed. All patients had hysterectomies performed by members of the Ob/Gyn department of Alamance Regional Medical Center. Comparisons of intraoperative and postoperative events were made in those patients who consented to the study and who returned their questionnaires. Parameters compared were patient age, weight, preoperative diagnosis, operative time, operative complications, blood loss, uterine weight, length of stay, postoperative complications, return to hospital, return to work, resumption of intercourse, dyspareunia, and bowel or bladder problems. RESULTS: Patient demographics and outcomes are similar. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy showed lower morbidity and quicker return to normal function, but most findings did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The results support the conclusion that the patients in each arm of the study are similar. The operative parameters show a longer operating time for the laparoscopic procedures than for total abdominal hysterectomy and total vaginal hysterectomy, respectively. The other indicators of morbidity show slight advantages of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy in blood loss, length of stay, and resumption of normal activities.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy: results from a randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with conventional hysterectomy (abdominal or vaginal). DESIGN: Cost effectiveness analysis based on two parallel trials: laparoscopic (n = 324) compared with vaginal hysterectomy (n = 163); and laparoscopic (n = 573) compared with abdominal hysterectomy (n = 286). PARTICIPANTS: 1346 women requiring a hysterectomy for reasons other than malignancy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: One year costs estimated from NHS perspective. Health outcomes expressed in terms of QALYs based on women's responses to the EQ-5D at baseline and at three points during up to 52 weeks' follow up. RESULTS: Laparoscopic hysterectomy cost an average of 401 pounds sterling (708 dollars; 571 euros) more (95% confidence interval 271 pounds sterling to 542 pounds sterling) than vaginal hysterectomy but produced little difference in mean QALYs (0.0015, -0.015 to 0.018). Mean differences in cost and QALYs generated an incremental cost per QALY gained of 267 333 pounds sterling (471 789 dollars; 380 437 euros). The probability that laparoscopic hysterectomy is cost effective was below 50% for a large range of values of willingness to pay for an additional QALY. Laparoscopic hysterectomy cost an average of 186 pounds sterling (328 dollars; 265 euros) more than abdominal hysterectomy, although 95% confidence intervals crossed zero (-26 pounds sterling to 375 pounds sterling); there was little difference in mean QALYs (0.007, -0.008 to 0.023), resulting in an incremental cost per QALY gained of 26 571 pounds sterling (46 893 dollars; 37 813 euros). If the NHS is willing to pay 30 000 pounds sterling for an additional QALY, the probability that laparoscopic hysterectomy is cost effective is 56%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hysterectomy is not cost effective relative to vaginal hysterectomy. Its cost effectiveness relative to the abdominal procedure is finely balanced.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed2004

Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a comparison of cesarean and postpartum hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, indications, outcomes, and complications of emergency hysterectomy performed after cesarean deliveries (cesarean hysterectomy) and vaginal deliveries (postpartum hysterectomy). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from 1990 to 2002 of patients who had peripartum hysterectomies at a single tertiary hospital. Comparisons were made between cesarean and postpartum hysterectomies. RESULTS: There were 55 cases of emergency peripartum hysterectomy (38 cesarean hysterectomies, and 17 postpartum hysterectomies), for a rate of 0.8 per 1000 deliveries. Overall, the most common indication for hysterectomy was uterine atony (56.4%), followed by placenta accreta (20.0%). Average estimated blood loss was 3325.6+/-1839.2 mL, average operating time was 157.1+/-75.4 minutes, average time from delivery to completing the hysterectomy was 333.8+/-275.7 minutes, and the average length of hospitalization was 11.0+/-7.9 days. The cesarean delivery rate at Grady Memorial Hospital during the study period was 14.2%. There were no statistically significant differences between variables examined when comparisons were made by cesarean vs postpartum hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: Uterine atony is the leading indication for emergency hysterectomy performed following cesarean and vaginal deliveries.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Elective cesarean hysterectomy vs elective cesarean section followed by remote hysterectomy: reassessing the risks.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the risks of elective cesarean hysterectomy with the risks of elective cesarean section followed by remote hysterectomy.Methods: A census of elective cesarean hysterectomies (n = 31) and a random sample of 200 cesarean sections and 200 hysterectomies performed by the authors between 1987 and 1996 were evaluated. Only elective repeat and primary cesarean section patients without labor were selected for study (n = 86). Total abdominal hysterectomies were drawn from the sample (n = 60), excluding cancer cases, patients over 50 years old, and those with ancillary procedures other than adnexectomy and lysis of adhesions. General probability theory was used to calculate a predicted complication rate of cesarean section followed by TAH from the complication rates of the component procedures done independently. This predicted combined complication rate was then compared to the observed rate of complications from cesarean hysterectomy to evaluate the risks of the two alternative treatment regimens.Results: Elective cesarean section and total abdominal hysterectomy had complication rates of 12.8% and 13.4%, respectively. The predicted combined complication rate for elective cesarean section followed by TAH was 24.5%. The observed rate of complications for elective cesarean hysterectomy was much lower (16.1%). Although bleeding complications were similar for the two regimens, the rate of transfusion was higher for cesarean hysterectomy (13.0%) than for cesarean section (0%) and TAH (3.4%) alone. Eighty percent of the cesarean hysterectomy patients would have been candidates for autologous blood donation, had it been available.Conclusions: Elective cesarean hysterectomy has a lower risk of complications than elective cesarean section followed by remote abdominal hysterectomy and should be preferred. Transfusion risks are higher for cesarean hysterectomy but can be decreased by the use of autologous blood.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1999

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study.

The present randomized study was undertaken in order to compare the short-term results between total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in a centre with experience in laparoscopic surgery. From January 1997 to September 1998 inclusive, 102 women aged 44-71 years were randomly assigned to either total laparoscopic hysterectomy (n = 51 patients) or abdominal hysterectomy (n = 51 patients). The patients' demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Average intra-operative blood loss was lower in laparoscopic hysterectomy than in abdominal hysterectomy (P </= 0. 001). The average time employed for laparoscopic hysterectomy was 104.1 +/- 26.98 min; according to the learning curve experienced in this study, the range was 72-163 min and the results after the plateau was reached showed no statistical difference between laparoscopic and abdominal operating times. The mean length of hospital stay was 2.38 +/- 0.30 days in the laparoscopic hysterectomy group versus 6.23 +/- 1.85 days in the abdominal hysterectomy group (P </= 0.001). In conclusion, this study shows that total laparoscopic hysterectomy can be effectively performed within reasonable time limits, provided that operators are experienced surgeons in operative laparoscopy and that operating times are comparable with those of abdominal hysterectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Changes in vesicourethral function following laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether total hysterectomy is associated with increased postoperative vesicourethral abnormalities. SAMPLE: Forty-five patients had a laparoscopic hysterectomy and 36 patients had a total abdominal hysterectomy. DESIGN: Before and after hysterectomy, patients underwent a urinalysis, a personal interview, and an urodynamic study. RESULTS: Of the laparoscopic hysterectomy group, 27 patients (60%) exhibited urinary symptoms preoperatively, and 22 patients (48.9%) remained symptomatic following surgery. There was no significant change in the number of women with one or more urinary symptoms, but the incidence of urinary frequency and stress incontinence decreased significantly following hysterectomy (p < 0.05). Of the total abdominal hysterectomy group, preoperative voiding symptoms were present in 22 patients (61.1%). After surgery, urinary symptoms were present in 19 patients (52.8%). Some patients did not complain of any urinary frequency or stress incontinence following hysterectomy, but this figure did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). Maximal urethral closure pressure and maximal cystometric capacity demonstrated significant increases for both groups following surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that total hysterectomy, either laparoscopic or total abdominal hysterectomy, did not significantly increase the subjective and objective incidence of vesicourethral dysfunction. On the contrary, some patients experience a substantial improvement of pre-existing urinary frequency or stress incontinence, partly as a result of an increase in the maximal urethral closure pressure and total bladder capacity following hysterectomy.

Female↗
PubMed1999

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy in a community hospital. A cost comparison.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility for an institution to offer laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy as a cost-effective alternative to total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in a managed care environment. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study in which 138 consecutive laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies performed between December 1992 and May 1996 were reviewed and compared to 354 consecutive TAHs performed during the same period. Operating time, use of operative room supplies, length of stay and actual total, fixed and variable costs of each case were calculated for the entire hospital stay and for each hospital cost center. Differences between costs were analyzed by ANCOVA using age, patient weight, specimen weight and number of operative procedures performed at the time of hysterectomy as covariants. RESULTS: The mean operative room time was significantly greater for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy than for TAH (167.4 [SD 51.2] vs. 103 minutes [30.3, P < .001]). In contrast, length of stay was significantly shorter for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy than for TAH (0.8 [SD 1.1] vs. 3.4 days [.9, P < .001]). The adjusted mean costs of both operative room time and supplies were significantly higher for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy than for TAH (P < .001). In contrast, the mean cost of length of stay for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy was significantly lower (P < .001). However, the adjusted mean total costs of the entire hospital stay were not significantly different: $2,716 for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. $2,702 for TAH (F = .7, P = .8). The absence of significant differences between procedures resulted from our limited use of disposable supplies (no automated stapling device) and from shorter lengths of stay, which compensated well for the higher operative room costs of time and supplies incurred with laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy is, at least in the short term, a cost-effective alternative to TAH in a managed care environment.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the intraoperative and short-term postoperative complications of laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of 167 women who had laparoscopic hysterectomy and 119 women who had total abdominal hysterectomy. For assessing the learning curve, the laparoscopic hysterectomies were further subdivided to the first 30 hysterectomies and the later hysterectomies. For data analysis Student's t-test, chi2-test and Fisher's exact test were used. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for age, body mass index, previous abdominal surgery, uterine weight, first postoperative day hemoglobin drop, blood transfusion and major or minor complications rate. Operation time was significantly longer for laparoscopic than abdominal hysterectomy (156+/-40 and 91.2+/-33 min, respectively; P<0.001) but the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (3.9 and 6.55 days, respectively; P<0.001). The conversion rate of laparoscopic hysterectomy was 1.8% (three cases). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hysterectomy can be safely done even during the learning curve with a low and reasonable complication rate, and a shorter hospital stay but with longer operation time. As experience is gained the operation time, complication rate and hospital stay are decreased.

Female↗
PubMed2006

Sexual experience of partners after hysterectomy, comparing subtotal with total abdominal hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of knowledge about partners' sexual experience after hysterectomy. The aim of this study was to explore potential differences in the experience of sexual intercourse by the partner, related to the operation method (subtotal versus total abdominal hysterectomy). METHOD: Of all patients having undergone abdominal hysterectomy for benign indications at St Olav Hospital, Trondheim between February 2001 and March 2003, Norway, 120 patients (60 total, 60 subtotal abdominal hysterectomy) were identified. Each patient and partner received a postal questionnaire addressing sexuality in connection with the operation. RESULTS: Of the 240 questionnaires, 111 were returned, a response rate of 46%. Among partners of women having undergone total hysterectomy, proportionally more noticed during sexual intercourse that the uterus had been removed (12%) compared to partners of women having undergone subtotal hysterectomy (4%); this was not significant and all of these partners experienced this as positive. Sexual satisfaction was improved or unchanged in most women and their partners, regardless of operation type. Partners who reported poor satisfaction before the operation were significantly more likely to report poor satisfaction after the operation. A high proportion of partners in both hysterectomy groups had not discussed sexuality in relation to the surgery either before or after the operation (subtotal: 44%; total: 24%; not significant). CONCLUSION: The majority of women and their partners reported no negative impact on sexual satisfaction after abdominal hysterectomy, regardless if subtotal or total. The only predictor of negative sexual experience of partners after hysterectomy was negative sexual experience before hysterectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy: a controlled study of clinical and functional outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and functional outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open hysterectomy for benign gynaecological pathology. SETTING: Gynaecological unit in a university hospital. METHODOLOGY: Forty consecutive cases of laparoscopic hysterectomy performed by the first author between June 1994 and December 1998 were reviewed. Their post-operative clinical and functional outcomes were compared with that of 40 patients with similar uterine size who had abdominal hysterectomy through a Pfannenstiel incision performed by consultant gynaecologists over the same time period. FINDINGS: Thirty-seven (92.5%) of the 40 patients had successful completion of laparoscopic hysterectomy. Of the patients who had successful laparoscopic hysterectomy, the duration of surgery was longer (mean duration: 159 vs 98 minutes), but they had a lower risk of complications (8.1% vs 20%), reduced analgesic requirement (mean pethidine dose: 93 vs 199 mg), and stayed for a shorter time in hospital (mean post-operation stay: 3.1 vs 4.9 days) when compared with patients who had abdominal hysterectomy. They were also able to return to full domestic function and sexual activity earlier. More patients in the laparoscopic hysterectomy group were happy with the appearance with the surgical scar, and the overall satisfaction with the surgery was also more positive than those who had abdominal hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with improved clinical and functional outcomes when compared with open hysterectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Elective cesarean hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

We retrospectively compared elective cesarean hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Sixteen patients had cesarean hysterectomy and 53 had vaginal hysterectomy. There were no deaths in either group and no neonatal complications in the cesarean hysterectomy group. Major and minor complications were comparable in the two groups except that urinary tract infection was statistically more common in the cesarean hysterectomy group. The mean hospital stay for the two groups was comparable. The estimated blood loss and transfusion rate were higher in the cesarean hysterectomy group. The transfusion rate was probably artificially increased because of overzealous intraoperative transfusion. Elective cesarean hysterectomy does not cause unacceptably high morbidity, and it is an acceptable alternative to interval vaginal hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in poorly compliant patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

A randomised prospective study of laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy each with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify differences in the peri-operative outcome of women undergoing hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed either by abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or by laparoscopic-assisted salpingo-oophorectomy and vaginal hysterectomy. To identify any potential management implications, including financial differences, between these two forms of operations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighty women undergoing hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for benign gynaecological conditions were prospectively randomised to have the procedure by laparoscopic-assisted bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and vaginal hysterectomy or total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The peri-operative and post-operative courses of both groups were compared. RESULTS: Although laparoscopic-assisted bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and vaginal hysterectomy took longer (100 (SD 5.6) versus 57 (SD 4.7) min, P < 0.0001), the women undergoing this procedure had a shorter time in hospital (3.5 versus six days, P < 0.0001) quicker recovery (three versus six weeks, P < 0.0001) and returned to work earlier. There were minimal complications in both groups and they were not significantly different. The cost of the laparoscopic-assisted procedure was greater during the operation with longer operating time and cost of disposable instruments. However, the total cost of treatment was less in this group because of shortened post-operative stay. CONCLUSION: The study shows laparoscopic-assisted bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and vaginal hysterectomy is a safe and cost-effective procedure for women requiring a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

The postoperative inflammatory response to injury following laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy.

The magnitude of the inflammatory response to surgery depends on the degree of injury during surgical procedures. Laparoscopic techniques are generally associated with less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay compared with open procedures, presumably due to less tissue injury and reduced inflammatory response. However, no study has been done, to our knowledge, to assess the inflammatory response to surgical trauma following laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy. We have, therefore, compared the magnitude of the inflammatory response to injury after laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (11 patients) and abdominal hysterectomy (11 patients) by measuring serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) on admission, and at 24 and 48 hours after the operation. Postoperatively, serum CRP rose significantly in both groups but levels in patients who underwent laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy were significantly lower than in those who underwent abdominal hysterectomy. Serum IL-6 rose significantly after abdominal hysterectomy but not after laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Our results show that the inflammatory response to surgical trauma was significantly less after laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy than after abdominal hysterectomy confirming that the laparoscopic procedure causes less tissue damage than the abdominal procedure.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy as an alternative to abdominal hysterectomy in patients with fibroids.

OBJECTIVE: Introduction of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) was evaluated for its usefulness to replace abdominal hysterectomy in fibroids. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 240 women with a mean age of 46.7 years underwent hysterectomy over a period of one year. The technique of LAVH was introduced starting in the second quarter of the study period. Clinical data of 60 patients undergoing either LAVH or abdominal hysterectomy for fibroids were compared in a cross-sectional study by chi 2- and t-test. RESULTS: A comparison between the first and the last quarter of the study period showed that the rate of abdominal hysterectomies decreased from 66% to 12%, whereas LAVH increased from 0 to 40% (p < 0.05). The rate of vaginal hysterectomies remained between 34% and 48%. Compared to abdominal hysterectomy, LAVH operating time was about 1/3 longer, hospital stay was shorter (3 days), and LAVH proved more cost-effective than abdominal hysterectomy (significance of all differences: p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: LAVH is a valid alternative to abdominal hysterectomy in fibroids.

Adult↗