Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Fructosamine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1990

[Fructosamine as a diagnostic parameter in the clinical routine].

The fructosamine normal range was established from a collective of 90 healthy individuals as 219-285 mumol/l (+/- 2s; mean 240 mumol/l). From a group of 10 diabetics day profiles of glucose, protein, albumin, and fructosamine were recorded by measuring these parameters three times per day at 8.00, 11.30, and 15.00. The fructosamine concentration was essentially constant also when related to protein or albumin. Fructosamine, HbAlc, CK, and CK-MB were determined from 12 diabetics with fresh myocard infarct (7 diabetics, 5 non-diabetics). Surprisingly, diabetics as well as non-diabetics manifested high fructosamine concentrations. The origin of the fructosamine increase with non-diabetic myocard infarct patients is not yet known. Possibly the acute metabolic disorder plays an important role. An influence of fibrinogen on fructosamine is also conceivable. Additional investigations, including therapy of lysis, will be carried on. The stability of the fructosamine was examined by storing 50 sera (fructosamine 295-491 mumol/l, glucose 180-279 mg/dl) at different temperatures (+ 25 degrees C, + 4 degrees C, - 20 degrees C). At - 20 degrees C and + 4 degrees C fructosamine increases by up to 2% in 24 hours. At + 25 degrees C a 6% increase in fructosamine was observed within the same observation period.

Blood Proteins↗
PubMed1988

Clinical utility of serum fructosamine in diabetes mellitus compared with hemoglobin A1c.

To evaluate the clinical utility of fructosamine as a mean of monitor glycaemic control, fructosamine and HbA1c were compared in 46 random out-patients visiting a Diabetic Clinic as well as in 25 inpatients admitted to a Diabetes Day Care Unit. In the out-patients, there were a significant correlations between fructosamine and fasting blood glucose (r = 0.75) as well as between fructosamine and HbA1c (r = 0.91). However, when the reference values were considered, interesting differences were found; only 4% of the out-patients showed normal HbA1c values while 39% showed normal fructosamine values. Accordingly, fructosamine and HbA1c evaluate different aspects of glycaemic control. During an admission of 7 days to the Diabetes Day Care Unit no statistical changes in mean blood glucose and fructosamine values occurred. On the other hand, two weeks after discharge from the Unit, not only fructosamine (3.58 +/- 0.16 mmol vs 3.09 +/- 0.08 mmol/l) but also HbA1c (9.52 +/- 0.38% vs 8.33 +/- 0.23%) had improved significantly. Thus HbA1c measures improvements in glycaemic control as early as 3 weeks after changes in treatment. At six weeks after discharge HbA1c (7.63 +/- 0.34%) but not fructosamine (3.02 + 0.14 mmol/l) had improved further. HbA1c is a reliable marker of glycaemic control while the value of fructosamine in clinical practice is unclear.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

A prospective, randomized, multicentered controlled trial to compare the annual outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus monitored with weekly fructosamine testing versus usual care: a 3-month interim analysis.

The recent introduction of a home monitoring system that measures whole blood glucose and whole blood fructosamine values by fingerstick blood drop adds a previously unavailable estimate of overall glycemic control via the fructosamine component. Fructosamine serves as an indicator of overall glycemic control for a 10-14-day time frame versus the 90-day average indicated by the hemoglobin A1c (A1C) test. The utilization of the fructosamine test for management of patients with diabetes mellitus remains unclear. The primary objectives of this study are to compare the quarterly A1C results of subjects monitoring weekly fructosamine with those receiving usual care, to identify the number of patients achieving goal A1C, and to determine if the addition of a weekly fructosamine test changes a patient's quality of life. Secondary objectives include determining if specific patient demographics predict success or difficulty in achieving improved A1C. This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to collect weekly fructosamine in addition to daily glucose (Group 1) or usual care of daily glucose (Group 2) and had study visits every 3 months. Baseline and quarterly A1C tests were collected. Quality of life assessment was conducted at baseline and will be evaluated at the final study visit. Sixty subjects have been randomized into the study since May 2001 with enrollment ongoing. Baseline demographics, glucose, fructosamine, and A1C were similar between the two groups. The 3-month interim analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in fructosamine (p = 0.265) between Group 1 (293.00 +/- 111.22 micromol/L) and Group 2 (336.69 +/- 111.12 micromol/L), respectively. No statistical difference at 3 months (p = 0.676) in A1C values for Group 1 (7.921 +/- 1.848% vs. 7.755 +/- 1.408%) and Group 2 (7.800 +/- 1.505% vs. 7.971 +/- 1.797%) were noted when compared with baseline. The interim data suggest that the fructosamine group has had a net decrease in A1C over the 3-month time frame, whereas the control group has had a net increase in A1C values. Ongoing follow-up will determine if this trend continues and becomes statistically and clinically significant.

Aging↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Serum fructosamine concentration as an index of glycemia in cats with diabetes mellitus and stress hyperglycemia.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate fructosamine concentrations in clinically healthy cats, sick cats with stress hyperglycemia, and untreated diabetic cats to determine the usefulness of this test in diagnosing diabetes mellitus in cats, and in differentiating the disease from stress-induced hyperglycemia. In addition, we evaluated if the degree of glycemic control in cats treated for diabetes influenced their serum fructosamine concentrations. In the 14 sick cats with stress hyperglycemia, the median serum fructosamine concentration (269 mumol/L) was not significantly different from the median value in the 26 clinically normal cats (252 mumol/L). Two of the 14 cats with stress hyperglycemia (14.3%) had serum fructosamine concentrations above the upper limit of the reference range (175 to 400 mumol/L); on the basis of these results, the test specificity was calculated as 0.86. In 30 cats with untreated diabetes mellitus, the median serum fructosamine concentration was 624 mumol/L, markedly higher than the value in either the normal cats or the cats with stress hyperglycemia. All but 2 of the 30 untreated diabetic cats (6.7%) had serum fructosamine concentration above the upper limit of the reference range; on the basis of these results, the sensitivity of serum fructosamine concentration as a diagnostic test for diabetes mellitus was 0.93. When 30 diabetic cats receiving treatment were divided into 3 groups according to their response to treatment (i.e., poor, fair, and good), the 16 cats that had a good response to treatment had significantly lower serum concentrations of both glucose and fructosamine compared with cats that had either a fair or poor response to treatment. A significant correlation (rs = .70, n = 100, P < .001) was found between serum concentrations of glucose and fructosamine. Results of this study indicate that quantification of serum fructosamine concentration is a meaningful test for the diagnosis of diabetes, for differentiating diabetes from stress hyperglycemia; and for monitoring the metabolic control in treated diabetic cats.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Use of fructosamine test in diabetic children.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the effect of glucose and the contribution of the aldimine component on the measurement of fructosamine, the relationship of serum fructosamine with glycosylated plasma proteins, as measured by a new high-performance liquid chromatography methodology (Glyc PP-HPLC) and by an affinity chromatography (Glyc PP), and the ability of serum fructosamine to assess acute, short-term (1-2 wk), and long-term (2-3 mo) glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The measurement of fructosamine was unaltered by the addition of up to 27.5 mM glucose or by the elimination of the aldimine component of serum specimens by dialysis. Fructosamine was generated in vitro by incubating serum aliquots. This generation was dependent on time, glucose concentration, and temperature. RESULTS: Fructosamine (n = 27) correlated well with Glyc PP (r = 0.76, P less than 0.01) and significantly less with Glyc PP-HPLC (r = 0.46, P less than 0.01). Although oral glucose ingestion increased serum glucose acutely by 200%, fructosamine was unchanged at each time interval. Improving glycemic control decreased the mean serum fructosamine concentration from 3.68 (baseline) to 3.28 mM (P less than 0.01) at 1 wk and to 3.13 mM (P less than 0.01) at 2 wk. HbA1c correlated with fructosamine (r = 0.59) and Glyc PP-HPLC (r = 0.47) but correlated best with Glyc PP (r = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate the fructosamine assay is unaltered by serum glucose, solely measures the ketoamine component, correlates well with glycosylated plasma proteins measured by aminophenylboronic acid column chromatography, is unaffected by acute changes of serum glucose, and may be used to monitor changes in glycemic control over a 1-wk interval.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Serum fructosamine concentration in cats with overt hyperthyroidism.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of hyperthyroidism on serum fructosamine concentration in cats. DESIGN: Cohort study. ANIMALS: 22 cats with overt hyperthyroidism. PROCEDURE: Hyperthyroidism was diagnosed on the basis of clinical signs, detection of a palpable thyroid gland, and high total serum thyroxine (T4) concentrations. Hyperthyroid cats with abnormal serum albumin, total protein, and glucose concentrations were excluded from the study. Samples for determination of serum fructosamine concentration were obtained prior to initiating treatment. Results were compared with fructosamine concentrations in healthy cats, cats in which diabetes had recently been diagnosed, and cats with hypoproteinemia. In 6 cats, follow-up measurements were obtained 2 and 6 weeks after initiating treatment with carbimazole. RESULTS: Serum fructosamine concentrations ranged from 154 to 267 mumol/L (median, 198 mumol/L) and were significantly lower than values in healthy cats. Eleven (50%) of the hyperthyroid cats had serum fructosamine concentrations less than the reference range. Serum fructosamine concentrations in hyperthyroid, normoproteinemic cats did not differ from values in hypoproteinemic cats. During treatment, an increase in serum fructosamine concentration was detected. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In hyperthyroid cats, concentration of serum fructosamine may be low because of accelerated protein turnover, independent of blood glucose concentration. Serum fructosamine concentrations should not be evaluated in cats with overt hyperthyroidism and diabetes mellitus. Additionally, concentration of serum fructosamine in hyperthyroid cats should not be used to differentiate between diabetes mellitus and transitory stress-related hyperglycemia.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

[Determination of fructosamine in chronic kidney diseases (dialysis-dependent patients)].

The serum fructosamine normal range was confirmed. Correction to protein or albumin did not significantly affect the results. Therefore, correction of fructosamine values from patients with normal protein and albumin values would not improve the clinical significance of fructosamine. Fructosamine concentrations of heparin plasma from non-diabetics also fell within the serum fructosamine normal range. The fructosamine concentration from non-diabetic dialysis patients was significantly higher and more widely distributed than that of the reference collective despite normal blood glucose concentration. Relating fructosamine to protein had no substantial effect, whereas the differences were even increased when fructosamine was related to albumin. On the present stage of knowledge it might be considered to establish a reference interval for dialysis patients. It appears that the fructosamine estimation may then be successfully applied also to dialysis patients. Although dialysis resulted in hemoconcentration, the fructosamine concentration remained virtually unchanged. Referencing both values before and after dialysis to protein or albumin improved the correlation, but substantial differences were introduced as well. However, none of several parameters measured in parallel interfered to a degree which might explain such differences. In order to find a reasonable explanation for these findings further experiments are necessary.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Serum fructosamine in the assessment of glycaemic control in diabetes mellitus.

Serum fructosamine determination was evaluated in the assessment of glycaemic control in diabetes mellitus. Intra- and inter-assay variation of the method was 0.5-0.8 and 1.5-2.9%, respectively. The fructosamine concentration in serum was found to be stable for at least 10 days independent of prevailing serum glucose concentration is stored at +4 degrees C or colder. Stability of serum fructosamine with respect to rapid fluctuations of blood glucose was of the same order as that of HbA1c. The reference interval (mean +/- 2 SD) for 92 non-diabetic individuals was 1.9-2.7 mmol/l. Good correlation was found between HbA1c and serum fructosamine (r = 0.79). Serum fructosamine and HbA1c correlated well with the mean blood glucose values of the preceding week (r = 0.88 and 0.75, respectively, p less than 0.001). Significant correlations of fructosamine and HbA1c with fasting blood glucose were also found (r = 0.53 and 0.55, respectively, p less than 0.001). Fructosamine determined simultaneously with fasting blood glucose in 65 oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) did not separate normal subjects from those with impaired glucose tolerance. Two of the three subjects with diabetic response in the OGTT had, however, elevated fructosamine concentrations. Determination of serum fructosamine is a technically simple, reproducible and moderately inexpensive method for the assessment of glycaemic control in diabetes mellitus. Standardization of the method is, however, not without problems. Uniformity of the calibration and assay protocol is essential for reliable interlaboratory comparison of results. Physiological states altering the rate of synthesis or elimination of serum proteins should be considered in the interpretation of fructosamine levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Fluctuations in fasting blood glucose and serum fructosamine in pregnant women monitored on successive antenatal visits.

Fasting blood glucose (FBG) and serum fructosamine are simple and commonly used tests for monitoring diabetes mellitus. Unfortunately, both these parameters are associated with high error rates and therefore used with caution in high-risk populations. Setting high cut-off values for these parameters increases the sensitivity but at the cost of poor specificity (more false positives). Continued efforts have been made to evaluate the efficacy of FBG and fructosamine, singly or in combination, in avoiding a large number of unnecessary oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT). Therefore, to better understand their time-course trends, we analysed FBG and c-fructosamine in 211 blood samples from 51 Saudi pregnant women during their multiple (> or =3) antenatal visits. The mean+/-standard deviation of FBG and c-fructosamine were 5.22+/-1.07 and 2.22+/-0.25 mmol/l respectively with a significant correlation between their individual values. Using the FBG cut-off >5.3 mmol/l, 19 subjects were classified as hyperglycaemic; this frequency was reduced to 1 when a FBG cut-off of >7.0 mmol/l was used. Combined values of FBG (>5.3 mmol/l) and c-fructosamine (>2.5 mmol/l) filtered 6 high-risk subjects with a prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Analysis of variance revealed high within-group variance for FBG. These fluctuations were also confirmed by higher coefficient of variations (CVs) for FBG (13.27%) as compared to c-fructosamine (5.49%). The CVs of FBG were not correlated with those of corresponding CVs of c-fructosamine (R = 0.007, P = 0.962), indicating that the fluctuations in FBG were independent of fluctuations in c-fructosamine. These findings clearly suggest that the paired values of FBG and c-fructosamine would be more advantageous than their individual values in filtering high-risk patients on whom OGTT should be performed.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1989

The effect of hypoalbuminaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia and renal failure on serum fructosamine concentration in non-diabetic individuals.

We have investigated the effects of hypoalbuminaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia and renal failure on serum fructosamine concentration in 39 non-diabetic patients. All patients were hypoalbuminaemic (median serum albumin 25 g/l, range 12-34 g/l). Group 1 (n = 19) were patients with hypoalbuminaemia alone, group 2 (n = 7) with hypoalbuminaemia and impaired renal function (median serum creatinine 226 mumol/l, range 154-461 mumol/l) and group 3 (n = 13) were subjects with hypoalbuminaemia and hyperbilirubinaemia (median serum bilirubin 34 mumol/l, range 19-83 mumol/l). Serum fructosamine was significantly lower in all three groups compared to age-matched normoalbuminaemic controls, but there was no significant difference in fructosamine concentrations between the groups. There was a correlation between fructosamine concentration and serum albumin. (r = 0.82, p less than 0.001) in all three groups combined. Serum fructosamine did correlate with serum bilirubin in patients with normal renal function (r = 0.0, p less than 0.001). In patients with abnormal renal function there was no correlation between serum fructosamine and either urea (r = 0.22, ns) or creatinine (r = 0.31, ns). Albumin is the major factor affecting serum fructosamine concentrations. Moderate hyperbilirubinaemia does not affect fructosamine concentration. No difference in fructosamine concentration could be demonstrated in patients with renal failure.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Fructosamine in human and bovine semen.

We detected the presence of fructosamine in human and bovine semen. In seminal plasma of healthy normozoospermic men (N = 17) fructosamine was found in 53% of the cases (fru+). In fru+ semen samples the concentration of fructosamine was (mean +/- S.E.M., N = 9) 0.45 +/- 0.09 mmol/L and varied from 0.15 to 0.75 mmol/L. It was 3-12 times lower than in blood serum of healthy men. In semen of infertile men (N = 57) fructosamine was present only in 21% of the cases and its concentration was lower than in fertile men i.e. (mean +/- S.E.M., N = 12) 0.27 +/- 0.007 mmol/L. In bulls (N = 98) fructosamine was found in semen of 82% of animals. In fru+ semen samples the concentration of fructosamine was (mean +/- S.E.M., N = 80) 0.77 +/- 0.12 mmol/L and varied from 0.30 to 1.15 mmol/L. We did not find any correlation between the concentration of fructosamine on one hand, and that of fructose and glucose on the other hand, in either human or bull semen. The difference in the frequency of fructosamine appearance in semen of fertile and infertile men suggests that fructosamine may be in some way involved in the process of fertilisation.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

The role of serum fructosamine as a screening test for gestational diabetes mellitus.

The serum fructosamine concentration indicates the degree of glycation of serum proteins, particularly albumin, and reflects an average blood glucose level over the previous 1-3 weeks. Serum fructosamine, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), total serum protein, serum albumin, fasting plasma glucose and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) have been measured in 127 healthy control subjects, 102 type 1 and 152 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and 106 nondiabetic pregnant women. Fructosamine concentration of 2.24 +/- 0.16 and 3.21 +/- 0.41 mmol/l (mean +/- S.D.) has been found in control subjects and diabetics respectively (P less than 0.001). During the second trimester a significantly lower fructosamine level (1.92 +/- 0.21 mmol/l) has been found in pregnant women, most likely due to the low serum albumin concentration (31.35 +/- 3.97 g/l). None of them had a fructosamine level above the normal limit of 2.55 mmol/l. On the other hand, 12 pregnant women showed a disturbed OGTT with normal fructosamine. If the serum fructosamine concentration was adjusted for 40 g/l albumin, then a mean fructosamine of 2.16 +/- 0.24 mmol/l was found in patients with gestational diabetes. Our results show that serum fructosamine has a similar diagnostic value as HbA1c for non-pregnant adults, but neither can replace OGTT for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Serum fructosamine in assessment of diabetic control and relation to thyroid function.

Measurement of serum fructosamine using a Roche kit is a simple and reliable method for the estimation of glycated serum proteins. The value of serum fructosamine can be affected by hyperglycemia in diabetics and an abnormal turnover rate of serum protein in patients with thyroid dysfunction. We measured the serum fructosamine level in 18 normal control subjects, 71 diabetics (8 IDDM, 63 NIDDM) and 46 non-diabetic untreated patients with thyroid dysfunction (28 hyperthyroidism, 18 hypothyroidism). The serum fructosamine level was significantly increased in the diabetics compared with the normal control subjects (3.84 +/- 0.15 mmol/l vs 2.58 +/- 0.08; mean +/- SE, P less than 0.01). The serum fructosamine level in the diabetics was positively correlated with the fasting plasma glucose and HbAlc level, showing the highest correlation with fasting plasma glucose at 2 weeks before and with the HbAlc level at 2 weeks after serum fructosamine measurement. In the patients with thyroid dysfunction, the serum fructosamine level in hyperthyroidism (2.08 +/- 0.03 mmol/l) and hypothyroidism (3.11 +/- 0.07 mmol/l) were significantly lower (P less than 0.001) and higher (P less than 0.001) than the normal control subjects (2.58 +/- 0.08 mmol/l), respectively. Furthermore, the serum fructosamine level in these patients was negatively correlated with the level of serum thyroid hormones such as T3 (P less than 0.001) and T4 (P less than 0.001). It is concluded that measurement of serum fructosamine is clinically useful for the evaluation of shorter-term glycemic control in diabetics, but its level for diabetic patients with thyroid dysfunction must be cautiously interpreted.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Fructosamine or glycated haemoglobin as a measure of diabetic control?

Glycated haemoglobin A1 (HbA1c), fructosamine, and total serum proteins were measured in 30 normal and 61 diabetic children. The normal range for HbA1c was 4.7-8.8% and for fructosamine was 0.98-1.88 mmol/l. These were similar to adult normal ranges and there were no significant age differences during childhood. There was a highly significant correlation between HbA1c and fructosamine in the diabetic children but this was lost when only concentrations within the established normal ranges were considered. Adjustment of concentrations of fructosamine for total serum proteins made no difference to the results. Changes in HbA1c and fructosamine were followed in three newly diagnosed patients and in one whose diabetes was getting worse. HbA1c decayed with a half life of 28.7 days and fructosamine decayed with a half life of 16.5 days. Fructosamine concentrations were lower than expected in the patients who were improving and higher than expected in the patient who was deteriorating. It is suggested that while fructosamine is not a direct substitute for HbA1c it may be a useful adjunct in determining whether a patient is worsening or improving in the short term. A change from HbA1c to fructosamine for routine assessment of diabetes while retaining HbA1c on selected occasions would result in some cost savings while retaining the advantages of having both assays available.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

A comparison of automated fructosamine and HbA1c methods for monitoring diabetes in pregnancy.

Two automated methods for measuring fructosamine (Test Plus and the original fructosamine assay) and glycated haemoglobin (Tina-quant immunoassay) were compared to determine which is the best index of blood glucose control during pregnancy. Thirteen women with type 1 diabetes were studied, with four-weekly measurements of HbA1c and fructosamine Test Plus using a Hitachi 911 analyser and fructosamine measured using an Olympus AU800 analyser. HbA1c correlated better (r = 0.573) with mean blood glucose (MBG) concentration than did fructosamine Test Plus (r = 0.347), even after correction for total protein concentration (r = 0.463), while there was no significant correlation with the original fructosamine method (r = 0.201). HbA1c correlated better with fasting/pre-prandial MBG concentrations, whereas fructosamine Test Plus correlated better with post-prandial MBG concentrations. Fructosamine Test Plus decreased with gestational age, and correlated with albumin and total protein concentrations, whereas HbA1c did not change with gestational age. Thus, HbA1c and fructosamine Test Plus were found to be useful in verifying home blood glucose measurements in diabetic pregnancy, with HbA1c being the best predictor of MBG concentration.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

A comparison of fructosamine and HbA1c for home self-monitoring blood glucose levels in type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Optimal glycemic control is believed to be essential in patients with diabetes to minimize any long-term complications. Measurement of the levels of glycated protein, such as fructosamine and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), is the most reliable method for assessing a period of glycemic control. This prospective study was performed to investigate whether fructosamine or HbA1c could provide a reliable index of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with type 2 diabetes were studied at four-week intervals. Their fasting, preprandial and postprandial blood glucose levels were checked by glucometer twice a week for 16 weeks. Serum fructosamine and HbA1c were measured on every visit. The correlation of fructosamine and HbA1c with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) values in the previous 1 to 16 weeks prior to their measurements were calculated. RESULTS: Both fructosamine and HbA1c were significantly correlated with SMBG values from one week to 16 weeks prior to measurements. The correlation between fructosamine and SMBG was stronger in the prior 3 to 6 weeks. The correlation between HbA1c and SMBG was higher in the previous 4 to 12 weeks with the peak falling in the previous 8-10 weeks. Except for the previous one week, all the correlations were significantly stronger between HbA1c and SMBG than between fructosamine and SMBG. CONCLUSIONS: In type 2 diabetes, serum fructosamine assay can better reflect average blood glucose concentration over the previous 3 to 6 weeks and HbA1c is better reflective over the previous 8 to 10 weeks. HbA1c measurement correlates more significantly with home capillary blood glucose levels than the fructosamine assay, even over the previous 2 to 3 weeks.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Evaluation of serum fructosamine concentration as an index of blood glucose control in cats with diabetes mellitus.

Fructosamine, a glycated serum protein, was evaluated as an index of glycemic control in normal and diabetic cats. Fructosamine was determined manually by use of a modification of an automated method. The within-run precision was 2.4 to 3.2%, and the day-to-day precision was 2.7 to 3.1%. Fructosamine was found to be stable in serum samples stored for 1 week at 4 C and for 2 weeks at -20 C. The reference range for serum fructosamine concentration in 31 clinically normal colony cats was 2.19 to 3.47 mmol/L (mean, 2.83 +/- 0.32 mmol/L). In 27 samples from 16 cats with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, the range for fructosamine concentration was 3.04 to 8.83 mmol/L (mean, 5.93 +/- 1.35 mmol/L). Fructosamine concentration was directly and highly correlated to blood glucose concentration. Fructosamine concentration also remained high in consort with increased blood glucose concentration in cats with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus over extended periods. It is concluded that measurement of serum fructosamine concentration can be a valuable adjunct to blood glucose monitoring to evaluate glycemic control in diabetic cats. The question of whether fructosamine can replace glucose for monitoring control of diabetes mellitus requires further study.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

[The value of fructosamine in hemodialysis patients].

Fructosamine is thought to be an alternative diabetic long term parameter to HbAlc. A possible advantage of fructosamine is the shorter half life of this parameter. Therefore changes in the metabolic control of diabetes can be evaluated faster. However, daily variations of protein concentrations limit the clinical usefulness of fructosamine, especially in patients on hemodialysis, where we see variations in total protein- and albumin concentration during dialysis. Due to these limitations we studied the clinical usefulness of a new fructosamine assay in 38 patients with chronic renal failure. Fructosamine values, total protein, albumin, blood glucose and creatinine were measured before and after three hours hemodialysis treatment as well as glycosylated hemoglobin. Before dialysis HbA1c correlated with HbA1c after dialysis (r = 0.99), which documents the usefulness of glycosylated hemoglobin in patients on hemodialysis. Fructosamine before dialysis shows a correlation with fructosamine values after dialysis of r = 0.77. After correction with total protein the correlation was r = 0.95, also after correction with albumin. Fructosamine values before and after dialysis correlated excellently (r = 0.95). Fructosamine values before and after dialysis can only be compared after correction with total protein or with albumin.

Blood Glucose↗