SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Fenofibrate”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2004

Simvastatin does not have a clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction with fenofibrate in humans.

Simvastatin and fenofibrate are both commonly used lipid-regulating agents with distinct mechanisms of action, and their coadministration may be an attractive treatment for some patients with dyslipidemia. A 2-period, randomized, open-label, crossover study was conducted in 12 subjects to determine if fenofibrate and simvastatin are subject to a clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction at steady state. In treatment A, subjects received an 80-mg simvastatin tablet in the morning for 7 days. In treatment B, subjects received a 160-mg micronized fenofibrate capsule in the morning for 7 days, followed by a 160-mg micronized fenofibrate capsule dosed together with an 80-mg simvastatin tablet on days 8 to 14. Because food increases the bioavailability of fenofibrate, each dose was administered with food to maximize the exposure of fenofibric acid. The steady-state pharmacokinetics (AUC(0-24h), C(max), and t(max)) of active and total HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, simvastatin acid, and simvastatin were determined following simvastatin administration with and without fenofibrate. Also, fenofibric acid steady-state pharmacokinetics were evaluated with and without simvastatin. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for AUC(0-24h) (80 mg simvastatin [SV] + 160 mg fenofibrate)/(80 mg simvastatin alone) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were 0.88 (0.80, 0.95) and 0.92 (0.82, 1.03) for active and total HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. The GMRs and 90% CIs for fenofibric acid (80 mg SV + 160 mg fenofibrate/160 mg fenofibrate alone) AUC(0-24h) and C(max) were 0.95 (0.88, 1.04) and 0.89 (0.77, 1.02), respectively. Because both the active inhibitor and fenofibric acid AUC GMR 90% confidence intervals fell within the prespecified bounds of (0.70, 1.43), no clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interaction between fenofibrate and simvastatin was concluded in humans. The coadministration of simvastatin and fenofibrate in this study was well tolerated.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Fenofibrate: metabolism and species differences for peroxisome proliferation in cultured hepatocytes.

The hypolipidemic agent fenofibrate, which is a peroxisome proliferator in some rodents in vivo, was studied in cultured hepatocytes for its metabolism and effects on enzymatic induction related to peroxisome proliferation so as to lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in peroxisome proliferation. [14C]-Fenofibrate was completely metabolized within 24 hr by primary cultures of rat hepatocytes and the metabolic pattern corresponded to that found in vivo. The main products were fenofibric acid and its glucuronidated form. Carbonyl reduction of fenofibric acid also occurred. The metabolic pattern of [14C]fenofibric acid was nearly the same as that of fenofibrate. Fenofibrate, fenofibric acid, and its reduced metabolite all induced peroxisomal (cyanide-insensitive) palmitoyl-CoA oxidation activity (PCOA) in rat hepatocytes, whereas derivatives lacking the carboxyl group were nearly inactive. The known species differences with respect to sensitivity to peroxisome proliferators in vivo was mirrored in cultured cells because fenofibric acid did not induce peroxisomal PCOA in primary culture of guinea pig hepatocytes nor in the human hepatoma cell line HepG2. The mechanistic association between the induction of CYP4A1-catalyzed lauric acid omega-hydroxylase (LAH) activity and peroxisomal PCOA induction was investigated. Fenofibric acid concomitantly induced LAH activity and peroxisomal PCOA in rat hepatocytes. Specific inhibition of LAH activity (-52%) by 10-undecynoic acid partially prevented induction of peroxisomal PCOA (-32%). The putative role of dicarboxylic acids, the oxidation product of omega-hydroxymonocarboxylic acids, in PCOA induction was further substantiated by the observed induction of peroxisomal PCOA by 1-12-dodecanedioic acid. We conclude that (1) fenofibric acid is the possible proximate peroxisome proliferator of fenofibrate in rat hepatocytes, (2) cultured hepatocytes reflect in vivo sensitivity to fenofibrate with respect to peroxisome proliferation, and (3) there is some evidence that the catalytic activity of the CYP4A1 enzyme mediates, at least in part, peroxisomal PCOA induction.

Animals↗

PubMed2007

Fenofibrate: a review of its use in primary dyslipidaemia, the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Fenofibrate is a fibric acid derivative indicated for use in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia, mixed dyslipidaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia in adults who have not responded to nonpharmacological measures. Its lipid-modifying effects are mediated by activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha. Fenofibrate also has nonlipid (i.e. pleiotropic) effects (e.g. it reduces fibrinogen, C-reactive protein and uric acid levels and improves flow-mediated dilatation). Fenofibrate improves lipid levels (in particular triglyceride [TG] and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [HDL-C] levels) in patients with primary dyslipidaemia. Its lipid-lowering profile means that fenofibrate is particularly well suited for use in atherogenic dyslipidaemia (characterised by high TG levels, low HDL-C levels and small, dense low-density lipoprotein [LDL] particles), which is commonly seen in patients with the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Indeed, fenofibrate improves the components of atherogenic dyslipidaemia in patients with these conditions, including a shift from small, dense LDL particles to larger, more buoyant LDL particles. Greater improvements in lipid levels are seen when fenofibrate is administered in combination with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) or in combination with ezetimibe, compared with monotherapy with these agents. In the DAIS study, fenofibrate significantly slowed the angiographic progression of focal coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. In terms of clinical outcomes, although no significant reduction in the risk of coronary events was seen with fenofibrate in the FIELD trial in patients with type 2 diabetes, treatment was associated with a significantly reduced risk of total cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, primarily through the prevention of non-fatal myocardial infarction and coronary revascularisation. Subgroup analyses revealed significant reductions in total CVD events and coronary heart disease events in patients with no previous CVD, suggesting a potential role for primary prevention with fenofibrate in patients with early type 2 diabetes. Improvements were also seen in microvascular outcomes with fenofibrate in the FIELD trial. Fenofibrate is generally well tolerated, both as monotherapy and when administered in combination with a statin. Combination therapy with fenofibrate plus a statin appears to be associated with a low risk of rhabdomyolysis; no cases of rhabdomyolysis were reported in patients receiving such therapy in the FIELD trial. Thus, fenofibrate is a valuable lipid-lowering agent, particularly in patients with atherogenic dyslipidaemia.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2↗

PubMed2003

Free fatty acid metabolism during fenofibrate treatment of the metabolic syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine whether fenofibrate modifies the metabolism of nonesterified (free) fatty acids as a component of its triglyceride-lowering action in male patients with the metabolic syndrome. DESIGN: In a placebo-controlled trial lasting 16 weeks, patients were randomly assigned to fenofibrate (200 mg/d) or placebo for 8 weeks. They were then crossed over to placebo or treatment with fenofibrate for another 8 weeks. METHODS: Thirteen adult men had clinical characteristics of the metabolic syndrome that included atherogenic dyslipidemia, hypertension, elevated fasting glucose levels, or central obesity or a combination of these. They had measurements of plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels, postheparin lipase activities, and fasting concentrations and turnover rates of nonesterified fatty acids, as well as oral glucose tolerance testing with insulin and nonesterified fatty acid measurements. Levels of apolipoprotein C-II, C-III, and B were also measured, along with levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in lipoprotein species. RESULTS: Fenofibrate therapy did not change plasma concentrations and turnover rates of nonesterified fatty acids. For fasting nonesterified fatty acids, the values (mean +/- SD) for placebo versus fenofibrate were 446 +/- 31 micromol/L versus 493 +/- 71 micromol/L, respectively (not significant); nonesterified fatty acid turnover rates were 336 +/- 36 micromol/min versus 334 +/- 42 micromol/min for placebo versus fenofibrate, respectively. Moreover, no changes were noted in fasting or postprandial levels of plasma glucose and insulin. Despite this lack of change, fenofibrate therapy reduced the plasma levels of triglyceride by 30% (305 +/- 143 mg/dL versus 206 +/- 90 mg/dL for placebo versus fenofibrate, respectively; P <.045), with a similar reduction in cholesterol levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Large low-density lipoprotein species were increased and small low-density lipoprotein species were decreased by fenofibrate therapy. Levels of apolipoprotein C-III were reduced significantly (P <.03), as were ratios of postheparin hepatic lipase to lipoprotein lipase (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Fenofibrate therapy markedly reduced plasma triglyceride levels. However, it did not lower concentrations or turnover rates of nonesterified fatty acids, nor did it change glucose or insulin responses to an oral glucose challenge. These findings indicate that fenofibrate modifies fatty acid metabolism either in the liver or in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins but not in adipose tissue. Multiple mechanisms are likely involved as a consequence of the action of fenofibrate to activate peroxisomal-proliferator-activated receptor alpha.

Adipose Tissue↗

PubMed2001

Effect of fenofibrate on fatty liver in rats treated with alcohol.

BACKGROUND: Although fatty liver and hyperlipemia are common in chronic alcoholics, there is no practical approach to prevent alcoholic fatty liver. Recently, it has been reported that fibrates bind to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha and induce beta-oxidation enzymes of fatty acid in mitochondria. In this study, we investigated the effect of fenofibrate, one of the fibrates, on fatty liver in rats induced by chronic alcohol feeding. Furthermore, we studied the effect of fenofibrate on hyperlipemia in patients with alcoholic fatty liver. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were treated with liquid diet that contained ethanol (36% of total calories) or an isocaloric carbohydrate instead of ethanol for 4 weeks. Fenofibrate was administered orally with the liquid diets for 4 weeks at a concentration of either 0, 5, or 30 mg/kg body weight/day. As a pilot study, eight patients with alcoholic fatty liver were treated with 200 mg/day of fenofibrate for 4 weeks. RESULTS: After fenofibrate administration, fatty degeneration of liver was not observed in three of the five rats treated with 5 mg and in all rats treated with 30 mg of fenofibrate. Hepatic triglyceride content was decreased significantly in rats treated with 30 mg of fenofibrate compared with the rats not treated with fenofibrate. Serum triglyceride and total cholesterol levels also were decreased after treatment with fenofibrate. In eight alcoholic patients treated with 200 mg of fenofibrate for 4 weeks, serum triglyceride level decreased significantly compared with the levels before treatment. All patients continued alcohol consumption during fenofibrate administration. CONCLUSION: The results of the present investigation suggest that fenofibrate may be useful to prevent alcoholic fatty liver. Further studies with larger numbers of patients are necessary to obtain definitive results.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction between fenofibrate and ezetimibe.

OBJECTIVE: The cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe, significantly decreases low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. The pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and safety profiles of ezetimibe and fenofibrate were evaluated alone and after co-administration in 32 subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, evaluator (single)-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Subjects with untreated LDL-C > or = 130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) were randomized to receive one of four oral treatments each morning for 14 days: fenofibrate 200 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg, fenofibrate 200 mg, ezetimibe 10 mg, or placebo. Serum lipids were assessed before drug administration on day 1, day 7, and day 14. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed on day 14. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary pharmacodynamic parameter was percentage change from baseline in LDL-C concentration following co-administration of ezetimibe and fenofibrate vs either drug alone, or placebo. A secondary outcome was the potential for a pharmacokinetic interaction between ezetimibe and fenofibrate. RESULTS: Ezetimibe and fenofibrate co-administration was well tolerated and produced statistically significant mean percentage reductions from baseline in LDL-C (p < or = 0.05 vs either drug alone or placebo), total cholesterol and triglycerides (p < or = 0.05 vs either fenofibrate or placebo), apolipoprotein C-III (p < or = 0.05 vs placebo), and LDL-III (p < or = 0.05 vs either drug alone or placebo). Ezetimibe did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of fenofibrate. Concomitant fenofibrate administration significantly increased the mean C(max) and AUC of total ezetimibe approximately 64% and 48%, respectively. However, based on the established safety profile and flat dose-response of ezetimibe, this effect is not considered to be clinically significant. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of ezetimibe and fenofibrate produced significantly greater reductions in LDL-C than either drug alone and greater reductions in triglycerides than fenofibrate. These effects were accompanied by improvements in the lipid/lipoprotein profile, suggesting that co-administration therapy with ezetimibe and fenofibrate may be an effective therapeutic option for patients with mixed dyslipidemia.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Safety and efficacy of colesevelam hydrochloride in combination with fenofibrate for the treatment of mixed hyperlipidemia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction achieved by adding the specifically engineered bile acid sequestrant (SE-BAS) colesevelam HCl to a stable dose of fenofibrate in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with mixed hyperlipidemia (n = 129) were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study investigating the efficacy of fenofibrate plus colesevelam HCl versus fenofibrate monotherapy. After a 4- to 8-week washout period, subjects received fenofibrate 160 mg/day for 8 weeks and were then randomized to receive colesevelam HCl 3.75 g/day or placebo, in addition to fenofibrate 160 mg/day, for 6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The primary efficacy endpoint was mean percent change in LDL-C during randomized treatment. Secondary endpoints included absolute and percent changes in mean levels of LDL-C, triglycerides (TGs), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non-HDL-C, total cholesterol (TC), and apolipoproteins (apo) A-I and B during randomized treatment and from washout to end of randomized treatment. RESULTS: Of the 129 patients randomized to treatment, 119 completed the study. After 6 weeks of treatment, fenofibrate plus colesevelam HCl produced a mean percent change in LDL-C of -10.4% versus +2.3% with fenofibrate monotherapy (p < 0.0001). Fenofibrate plus colesevelam HCl was significantly more effective than fenofibrate alone at reducing levels of non-HDL-C, TC, and apo B (p < or = 0.0002). Colesevelam HCl did not significantly affect the TG-lowering effects of fenofibrate. Both treatment regimens were safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with fenofibrate monotherapy in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia, fenofibrate/colesevelam HCl combination therapy significantly reduced mean LDL-C, non-HDL-C, TC, and apo B levels without significantly affecting the TG-lowering or HDL-C-raising effects of fenofibrate. Fenofibrate/colesevelam HCl combination therapy is a safe, useful alternative for the treatment of mixed hyperlipidemia.

Allylamine↗

PubMed2002

Mechanisms of the triglyceride- and cholesterol-lowering effect of fenofibrate in hyperlipidemic type 2 diabetic patients.

In humans, the precise mechanisms of the hypolipidemic action of fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha agonist, remain unclear. To gain insight on these mechanisms, we measured plasma lipids levels, lipids synthesis (hepatic de novo lipogenesis and cholesterol synthesis), and mRNA concentrations in circulating mononuclear cells (RT-PCR) of hydroxymethylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA reductase, LDL receptor, LDL receptor- related protein (LRP), scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI), ABCAI, and liver X receptor (LXR)-alpha in 10 control subjects and 9 hyperlipidemic type 2 diabetic patients. Type 2 diabetic subjects were studied before and after 4 months of fenofibrate administration. Fenofibrate decreased plasma triglycerides (P < 0.01) and total cholesterol (P < 0.05) concentrations and slightly increased HDL cholesterol (P < 0.05). Hepatic lipogenesis, largely enhanced in diabetic subjects (16.1 +/- 2.1 vs. 7.5 +/- 1.6% in control subjects, P < 0.01), was decreased by fenofibrate (9.8 +/- 1.5%, P < 0.01). Fractional cholesterol synthesis was normal in diabetic subjects (3.5 +/- 0.4 vs. 3.3 +/- 0.5% in control subjects) and was unchanged by fenofibrate (3.5 +/- 0.5%). Absolute cholesterol synthesis was, however, increased in diabetic subjects before and after fenofibrate (P < 0.05 vs. control subjects). HMG-CoA reductase, LDL receptor, LRP, and SR-BI mRNA concentrations were not different in type 2 diabetic and control subjects and were unchanged by fenofibrate. LXR-alpha mRNA levels were increased (P < 0.05) by fenofibrate. ABCAI mRNA concentrations, which were decreased in diabetic subjects (P < 0.05) before fenofibrate, were increased (P < 0.05) by fenofibrate to values comparable to those of control subjects. The plasma triglyceride-lowering effect of fenofibrate is explained in part by a decrease in hepatic lipogenesis, the moderate fall in total plasma cholesterol is not explained by a reduction of whole-body cholesterol synthesis, and the increase in LXR-alpha and ABCAI mRNA levels suggests that fenofibrate stimulated reverse cholesterol transport.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter 1↗

PubMed2006

[Effects of fenofibrate on the proliferation and apoptosis and nitric oxide synthase expression of cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells induced by lysophosphatidylcholine].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of fenofibrate on the proliferation and apoptosis and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) mRNA expression of cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) induced by lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC). METHODS: HUVECs were cultured in vitro. The study was designated to 5 groups according to fenofibrate concentration: control group, LPC group, LPC + low-concentration fenofibrate (10 micromol/L), LPC + middle-concentration fenofibrate (50 micromol/L), and LPC + high-concentration fenofibrate (100 micromol/L). The study was designated to 6 groups according to the intervention time: control group, LPC group, LPC + fenofibrate (50 micromol/L) 6 h, LPC + fenofibrate 12 h, LPC + fenofibrate 24 h, and LPC + fenofibrate 48 h. The proliferation and apoptosis of HUVECs were evaluated by MTT assay, flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy, respectively. eNOS mRNA were assayed by real time-PCR. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, LPC could inhibit the proliferation and induce apoptosis, and downregulate eNOS mRNA expression and decrease NO production of HUVECs. Fenofibrate could increase the proliferation and decrease the apoptosis, and up-regulate eNOS mRNA expression and enhance NO production in HUVECs. CONCLUSION: Fenofibrate could improve the proliferation and inhibit the apoptosis, and up-regulate eNOS mRNA expression of HUVECs induced by LPC, which may be responsible for fenofibrate to prevent and treat atherosclerosis.

Apoptosis↗

PubMed1981

Plasma lipid concentrations and lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase activity in normolipidemic subjects given fenofibrate and colestipol.

Plasma lipids and lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations and lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase activity were measured in 7 normolipidemic subjects before, and 7 days after, the administration of fenofibrate (300 mg daily) and colestipol (15 g daily) taken separately or simultaneously. Fenofibrate provoked a significant decrease in the mean plasma triglycerides (26%) and cholesterol (10%) concentration; only plasma cholesterol concentrations were significantly lowered by colestipol (26%). The cholesterol lowering effects of the two drugs were additive as was observed when colestipol was added to fenofibrate. The mean plasma high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentration was significantly increased by fenofibrate (10%) and when colestipol was added to fenofibrate (15%), but not by colestipol alone. Both fenofibrate and colestipol caused significant reduction of the mean plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration and the mean plasma LDL-C/HDL-C ratio (13% and 18%, respectively, with fenofibrate, 44% and 52% with colestipol, and 53% and 62% with colestipol added to fenofibrate). The mean plasma fractional esterification rate was significantly increased by 25% and 12%, respectively, with fenofibrate and colestipol when taken separately, and still more (91%) when colestipol was added to fenofibrate. The mean plasma molar esterification rate was significantly lowered by colestipol, but remained unchanged with the other drug regimens. This study shows that fenofibrate and colestipol given to normolipidemic subjects can induce in a very short period of time (7 days) marked changes in lipoprotein metabolism. Interpretations of the findings in relation to lipoprotein metabolism are discussed.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

A new fenofibrate formulation: results of six single-dose, clinical studies of bioavailability under fed and fasting conditions.

BACKGROUND: The main drawback of the lipid-lowering agent fenofibrate is low bioavailability when taken orally on an empty stomach. Even the newest marketed formulations, micronized fenofibrate (MF) 200-mg capsules and microcoated fenofibrate (MCF) 160-mg tablets, require administration with meals to increase bioavailability. Insoluble Drug Delivery-Microparticle (IDD-P) fenofibrate 160-mg tablets are a new formulation developed to provide bioavailability independent of food. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this group of studies were to determine the effects of food on the bioavailability of IDD-P fenofibrate and MCF and to compare the bioavailabilities of IDD-P fenofibrate, MF, and MCF under fasting and fed conditions. METHODS: Six single-dose pharmacokinetic studies were conducted in healthy adult volunteers. The primary end points were the extrapolated area under the curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), the experimental AUC from time 0 to time t, and the maximum plasma concentration of the active fenofibrate metabolite, fenofibric acid. The bioavailabilities of tested treatments were compared using the 90% CIs of ratios of least squares means (RLSMs) of logarithmically transformed AUC(0-infinity) values; 90% CIs within 80% to 125% were considered to indicate equivalent bioavailability (ie, extent of absorption). RESULTS: One hundred thirteen subjects (87 men, 26 women) received > or =1 study treatment and were evaluable for tolerability, and 99 of them (77 men, 22 women) were evaluable for bioavailability. The RLSMs of IDD-P fenofibrate extent of absorption (AUC(0-infinity)) under fed versus fasting conditions were 104.99%, 118.76%, and 113.56% (high-fat fed) and 111.06% and 110.64% (low-fat fed) in 5 separate comparisons. The corresponding 90% CIs were 95.38% to 115.58%, 113.38% to 124.40%, 107.54% to 119.93%, 106.06% to 116.32%, and 104.75% to 116.86%. All of these CIs were within the 80% to 125% range, suggesting equivalent bioavailability of IDD-P fenofibrate independent of food. The RLSM for MCF under high-fat fed versus fasting conditions was 151.19% (90% CI, 123.59%-184.94%). CONCLUSIONS: In healthy adult volunteers, IDD-P fenofibrate had an equivalent extent of absorption under fed or fasting conditions, suggesting that dosage regimens could include administration of the product without food. Administering drug independently of food may provide greater convenience and simplicity for patients and prescribers.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1994

Growth inhibition of human vascular smooth muscle cells by fenofibrate: a possible therapy for restenosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the growth inhibitory effect of fibrates on human vascular smooth muscle cells. Restenosis is the most important factor limiting the long term success of invasive vascular interventions and there is as yet no effective preventive treatment. Platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) is considered to be an important growth promoting agent for vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) and fenofibric acid (a hypolipidaemic drug) has been reported to be a PDGF antagonist. METHODS: The effect of the fibrate drugs fenofibrate, clofibrate, bezafibrate, and gemfibrozil were examined on the proliferation of cultured human vascular smooth muscle cells derived from saphenous vein (n = 20) and graft stenoses (n = 7). RESULTS: Fenofibrate (100 microM) produced potent inhibition (48%) of VSMC proliferation at a concentration equivalent to that of its circulating metabolite fenofibric acid, but none of the other drugs produced any significant effect on growth. VSMC derived from graft stenoses were equally sensitive to inhibition as saphenous vein derived controls, in contrast to our previous work which reported that graft stenosis derived VSMC were resistant to growth inhibition by the physiological inhibitor heparin. The antiproliferative effect of fenofibrate was independent of inhibition of cellular cholesterol synthesis or toxicity. Fenofibrate inhibited VSMC growth induced by 15% fetal calf serum, PDGF, and basic fibroblast growth factor to a similar degree, indicating that it is not a specific PDGF antagonist. CONCLUSIONS: Fenofibrate is not a specific PDGF antagonist. Fenofibric acid, one of the principal metabolites of fenofibrate, did not produce any inhibition of growth, suggesting that oral administration of fenofibrate would not be efficacious. Fenofibrate is the first potent inhibitor to be described for VSMC derived from human myo-intimal hyperplastic lesions.

Bezafibrate↗

PubMed1980

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction of colestipol and fenofibrate in volunteers.

The possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction between two hypolipidemic drugs, colestipol, an ion exchange resin, and fenofibrate, a phenoxyacid derivative, was studied in 6 male volunteers. The investigation followed a four-step protocol during 18 days, and relied on determination of plasma and urinary levels of fenofibric acid, the active metabolite of fenofibrate. The kinetics of a single dose of fenofibrate 300 mg was established over 3 days. Thereafter, from Days 4 to 9 fenofibrate was given daily as 200 mg in the morning and 100 mg in the evening; the plasma fenofibric acid level reached about 10 microgram/ml. From Days 9 to 15 the same dose of fenofibrate was administered together with colestipol 10 g in the morning and 5 g in the evening. Plasma fenofibric acid concentrations remained unchanged and the 24 h urinary excretion of fenofibric acid did not fall. On day 15, a last single dose of fenofibrate 300 mg was given with colestipol 15 g. The pharmacokinetic pattern of fenofibric acid on Days 15 to 18 did not differ significantly from that found previously (Days 1 to 3). From these results, it is likely that there is no pharmacokinetic interaction between the two hypolipidemic drugs.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Properties of rapidly dissolving eutectic mixtures of poly(ethylene glycol) and fenofibrate: the eutectic microstructure.

Poly(ethylene glycol) or PEG is an ideal inactive component for preparing simple binary eutectic mixtures because of its low entropy of fusion ( approximately 0.0076 J/mol-K), lower melting point (approximately 62 degrees C) compared to most pharmaceuticals, miscibility with drugs at elevated temperatures, and its covalent crystalline lattice. Implication of these physicochemical properties on eutectic crystallization and size reduction of the drug is discussed. Enhancement of the dissolution rate of a poorly soluble compound through the formation of PEG-drug eutectics was investigated using fenofibrate. Solid dispersions of PEG-fenofibrate when characterized, revealed that PEG and fenofibrate form a simple eutectic mixture containing 20-25%(w/w) fenofibrate at the eutectic point. Eutectic crystallization led to the formation of an irregular microstructure in which fenofibrate crystals were found to be less than 10 microm in size. Dissolution rate improvement of fenofibrate correlated with the phase diagram, and the amount of fenofibrate released from the dispersions that contained fenofibrate as a eutectic mixture was at least 10-fold higher compared to untreated fenofibrate. On aging, the dissolution rate of the dispersion containing 15%(w/w) fenofibrate in PEG remained unaltered. The results indicate that PEG-drug eutectic formation is a valuable option for particle size reduction and subsequent dissolution rate improvement.

Chemistry, Pharmaceutical↗

PubMed1992

Modulation of lipoprotein production in Hep G2 cells by fenofibrate and clofibrate.

Fenofibrate and other fibrate derivatives are commonly used to treat hyperlipidemia. It is not yet clear how they exert their modulatory effects on plasma lipoproteins. To investigate whether these drugs act on the liver to primarily inhibit very low density lipoprotein production, we utilized the highly differentiated human hepatoma cell line, Hep G2. At concentrations greater than 15 micrograms/mL, fenofibrate caused a 30% decrease in secreted apolipoprotein B (apo B) after 4 days of treatment. Pulse-chase studies demonstrated that this was not due to inhibition of apo B synthesis. Triglyceride synthesis by fenofibrate-treated Hep G2 cells was decreased by 30%, and the amount secreted into the medium was reduced by 50%. At a low concentration of drug (5 micrograms/mL), triglyceride secretion was reduced markedly while apo B secretion remained unchanged. Thus, apo B secretion is less sensitive to fenofibrate than the synthesis and secretion of triglyceride, and may be secondary to changes in the latter. Fenofibrate has also been shown to raise plasma high density lipoprotein concentrations. We found that low concentrations of fenofibrate caused a 20-101% increase in secreted apolipoprotein AI (apo AI), and pulse-chase immunoprecipitation studies showed that this was due to an increase in apo AI synthesis. Fenofibrate was compared to clofibrate to investigate whether their relative effects on lipoprotein production in Hep G2 cells were comparable to their relative effects on plasma lipoproteins. Both fibrates decreased the secretion of apo B to the same extent, but only fenofibrate increased apo AI secretion. Fenofibrate was more effective than clofibrate in inhibiting the secretion of lipids by these cells. Thus, the known effects of fenofibrate on plasma lipoproteins can be attributed to its direct modulation of lipoprotein synthesis in the liver cell. Hep G2 cells may thus be useful in testing the relative efficacy of fibric acid derivatives in vitro.

Apolipoproteins A↗

PubMed2004

Effect of fenofibrate-mediated increase in plasma homocysteine on the progression of coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study (DAIS) examined the effects of fenofibrate or placebo on the progression of coronary artery disease (CAD) in 418 type 2 diabetic subjects with dyslipidemia. Fenofibrate use was associated with a 6% increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, a 28% decrease in triglycerides, a 5% decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and a 55% increase in plasma homocysteine (tHcy). The purpose of the present study was to determine whether this increase in tHcy in the fenofibrate group was associated with CAD progression or with clinical events. The increase in tHcy with fenofibrate (n = 207) was not related to changes in factors known to modulate tHcy levels (serum levels of Vitamin B(12), folate, or renal function). CAD was quantified by angiography at baseline and after a minimum of 3 years of therapy with fenofibrate or placebo. The primary end point was change in mean segment diameter (MSD), minimal lumen diameter, and percent stenosis. Baseline tHcy level was correlated with percent diameter stenosis (r = 0.111, p = 0.028). Baseline, but not end-of-study elevated tHcy levels, decreased the beneficial effect of fenofibrate. Unexpectedly, the final tHcy levels correlated negatively with CAD progression (r = -0.111, p = 0.031) in the overall group. In the fenofibrate group, there was no significant correlation between tHcy and minimal lumen diameter (r = -0.135, p = 0.069), or percent stenosis. An increase in tHcy levels was not correlated with adverse clinical events in the fenofibrate group. This analysis of the the DAIS reveals that the fenofibrate-mediated increase in tHcy levels does not attenuate the beneficial effects of fenofibrate on CAD progression or clinical events.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Fenofibrate induces a selective increase of protein-bound homocysteine in rodents: a PPARalpha-mediated effect.

Elevated levels of plasma homocysteine (Hcy) are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease though it is uncertain whether increases in Hcy represent a cause or a consequence of the disease process. Plasma Hcy exists in reduced, free oxidized, and protein-bound forms, that together comprise total Hcy (tHcy). Free reduced Hcy is thought to be the atherogenic, though minor, sub-fraction of tHcy. Recent reports have indicated that fenofibrate and other fibrates are capable of moderately increasing plasma tHcy. As many of the effects of fibrates are known to be mediated by the nuclear receptor PPARalpha, we determined the effect of fenofibrate on tHcy in PPARalpha-deficient mice. We further examined the effect of fenofibrate and fenofibrate plus folate supplementation on total as well as protein-bound Hcy in rats. Fenofibrate significantly increased serum tHcy in wild-type mice but not in PPARalpha deficient mice. In rats, fenofibrate increased serum tHcy by 69%, while the co-administration of folate with fenofibrate increased tHcy by only 7%. In spite of the above increase in tHcy in rats, only the protein-bound fraction of Hcy was increased. In a further study, fenofibrate also induced a significant increase in tHcy, while in spite of this, ex vivo peroxidation of VLDL+LDL was beneficially lowered and the lag time prolonged. In summary, fenofibrate increases serum tHcy in rodents in a PPARalpha-dependent manner. The increase in rats is solely due to protein-bound Hcy as atherogenic, reduced Hcy was unchanged. While awaiting corroboration in human, our results suggest that the extent and mechanism of the increase in total Hcy in patients treated with fenofibrate should not a priori be associated with relevant risk.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Effects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, partly owing to dyslipidaemia, which can be amenable to fibrate therapy. We designed the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study to assess the effect of fenofibrate on cardiovascular disease events in these patients. METHODS: We did a multinational, randomised controlled trial with 9795 participants aged 50-75 years, with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and not taking statin therapy at study entry. After a placebo and a fenofibrate run-in phase, we randomly assigned patients (2131 with previous cardiovascular disease and 7664 without) with a total-cholesterol concentration of 3.0-6.5 mmol/L and a total-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio of 4.0 or more or plasma triglyceride of 1.0-5.0 mmol/L to micronised fenofibrate 200 mg daily (n=4895) or matching placebo (n=4900). Our primary outcome was coronary events (coronary heart disease death or non-fatal myocardial infarction); the outcome for prespecified subgroup analyses was total cardiovascular events (the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary and carotid revascularisation). Analysis was by intention to treat. The study was prospectively registered (number ISRCTN 64783481). FINDINGS: Vital status was confirmed on all but 22 patients. Averaged over the 5 years' study duration, similar proportions in each group discontinued study medication (10% placebo vs 11% fenofibrate) and more patients allocated placebo (17%) than fenofibrate (8%; p<0.0001) commenced other lipid treatments, predominantly statins. 5.9% (n=288) of patients on placebo and 5.2% (n=256) of those on fenofibrate had a coronary event (relative reduction of 11%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.05; p=0.16). This finding corresponds to a significant 24% reduction in non-fatal myocardial infarction (0.76, 0.62-0.94; p=0.010) and a non-significant increase in coronary heart disease mortality (1.19, 0.90-1.57; p=0.22). Total cardiovascular disease events were significantly reduced from 13.9% to 12.5% (0.89, 0.80-0.99; p=0.035). This finding included a 21% reduction in coronary revascularisation (0.79, 0.68-0.93; p=0.003). Total mortality was 6.6% in the placebo group and 7.3% in the fenofibrate group (p=0.18). Fenofibrate was associated with less albuminuria progression (p=0.002), and less retinopathy needing laser treatment (5.2%vs 3.6%, p=0.0003). There was a slight increase in pancreatitis (0.5%vs 0.8%, p=0.031) and pulmonary embolism (0.7%vs 1.1%, p=0.022), but no other significant adverse effects. INTERPRETATION: Fenofibrate did not significantly reduce the risk of the primary outcome of coronary events. It did reduce total cardiovascular events, mainly due to fewer non-fatal myocardial infarctions and revascularisations. The higher rate of starting statin therapy in patients allocated placebo might have masked a moderately larger treatment benefit.

Aged↗