Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Emory University”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

A prospective study of transperineal prostatic block for transurethral needle ablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Emory University Experience.

PURPOSE: We evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness and role of transperineal prostate block in providing anesthesia during minimally invasive radio frequency thermal therapy of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 38 consecutive patients undergoing transurethral needle ablation for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia were entered in this prospective study. All patients received transperineal prostatic block as the main method of anesthesia. A mixture of equal volumes of 1% lidocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine, each with epinephrine (1:100,000 concentration ratio) was used. Pain control during the instillation of transperineal prostatic block and transurethral needle ablation was assessed using a 10-point linear analog pain scale and questionnaire. RESULTS: Median patient age was 65.5 years (range 47 to 79), with 21% of men in the eighth decade of life. Median American Urological Association symptom score was 25.0 (range 14 to 35), bother score was 20.0 (11 to 28), quality of life score was 4.0 (3 to 6) and peak urinary flow rate was 8.9 cc per second (3.5 to 15.7). Median sonographic prostate volume was 35.0 cc (range 17 to 129). Median volume of anesthetic agent used was 40.0 cc (range 30 to 60) per case (1.1 cc solution per 1 cc prostate tissue). No adverse events were encountered. Median pain score was 3.3 (range 1 to 6) during instillation of transperineal prostatic block and 1.0 (0 to 6) during transurethral needle ablation. Transperineal prostatic block proved highly effective and was a satisfactory method of anesthesia during transurethral needle ablation as judged by postoperative questionnaire. No sedation, narcotic or analgesia was required. All procedures were performed in the outpatient cystoscopy suite or office setting without support of an anesthesia team or conscious sedation monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Transperineal prostatic block is a safe, convenient, effective and satisfactory method of minimally invasive anesthesia for transurethral needle ablation of the prostate in an outpatient office setting. Elderly patients and those at high surgical risk can be treated safely using this approach. Considerable cost saving is seen secondary to omission of charges related to anesthesia team support, recovery room facility and conscious sedation monitoring.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

A randomized prospective trial of intrarectal lidocaine for pain control during transrectal prostate biopsy: the Emory University experience.

PURPOSE: We prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of intrarectal lidocaine gel as anesthesia during transrectal prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 63 consecutive men undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy 50 who qualified were enrolled in this study. Indications for the procedure were an abnormal prostate on digital rectal examination and/or elevated serum prostate specific antigen. Patients were randomized into group 1-25 who received 10 cc of 2% intrarectal lidocaine 10 minutes before the procedure and group 2-25 controls. No narcotics, sedation or analgesia was given. Pain during biopsy was assessed using a 10-point linear visual analog pain scale. RESULTS: In groups 1 and 2 median patient age was 63 and 66 years (p = 0.139), and median prostate specific antigen was 6.04 (range 1.07 to 263) and 7.24 (range 1.34 to 51.82) ng./ml. (p = 0.337). Digital rectal examination was normal and abnormal in 17 and 15 group 1, and in 8 and 10 group 2 patients, respectively. Ultrasound showed a median prostate volume of 43.6 cc (range 15.3 to 124) in group 1 and 40.3 (range 19.8 to 132) in group 2 (p = 0.710). Final histological results revealed prostate cancer in 7 men (28%) in each group. The median pain score during transrectal prostate biopsy was 2 (range 1 to 5) and 5 (range 1 to 7) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.00001). No adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Intrarectal lidocaine gel is a simple, safe and efficacious method of providing satisfactory anesthesia in men undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy. We recommend its routine administration in all patients during this procedure.

Administration, Rectal↗