Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ENDOSCOPY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Appropriateness and diagnostic yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open-access endoscopy system: a prospective observational study based on the Maastricht guidelines.

AIM: To test the appropriateness of referrals for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Campania, Italy, using the criteria of the Maastricht Consensus. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing endoscopy during a 1-week period in 21 Endoscopy Services were considered prospectively. The reasons for endoscopy were dyspeptic symptoms, history of peptic ulcer and assessment after treatment. The age, sex, symptoms, history of peptic ulcer (previous endoscopic or radiographic examinations and treatment), endoscopic diagnosis and H. pylori status were recorded. The indications for endoscopy were evaluated according to the Maastricht guidelines. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixteen of 706 patients presented with reflux symptoms, 430 with dyspeptic symptoms, 38 with alarm symptoms and 22 with atypical symptoms. Endoscopy was normal in 376 cases (53.2%); duodenal ulcer was found in 219, gastric ulcer in 45, oesophagitis in 82 and gastric cancer in six. All patients with cancer were older than 45 years, and four presented with alarm symptoms. In 398 cases (56%), endoscopy was considered not to be indicated: 250 patients with a previous diagnosis of ulcer without a change in symptoms, 38 patients in order to confirm eradication and 110 patients younger than 45 years with dyspepsia without alarm symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of endoscopic examinations could be avoided by following the guidelines of the Maastricht Consensus. In order to reduce endoscopic workload, strategies for educating physicians should be pursued.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Changes in cardiopulmonary parameters during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with heart disease: towards safer endoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Gastrointestinal endoscopy is an invasive examination. The aims of this study were to elucidate the effects and risks of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with regard to cardiopulmonary functions in patients with heart disease, and to establish safety guidelines for use during endoscopy in this particular group of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients involved were 53 inpatients in whom upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was carried out before cardiac surgery. Their cardiac functions had been evaluated previously. Electrocardiography with two leads (II, V5) was used, and blood pressure and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) were monitored throughout the procedure. The relationship between the changes in cardiopulmonary parameters during endoscopy and the cardiac functions was analyzed. RESULTS: Heart rate increased immediately after insertion of the endoscope (P < 0.01). There was a significantly higher incidence of ventricular and supraventricular extrasystoles during observation of the second portion of the duodenum (P < 0.05). A lower cardiac index (P < 0.05) and a higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification (P < 0.05) were found in patients with oxygen desaturation than in patients without it. Two patients with severe coronary artery lesions showed marked ST-T depression, and these ischemic changes were thought to be due to increase in cardiac work during endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has many adverse effects on cardiopulmonary functions in patients with heart disease. In our study, the clinical value of very close monitoring and administration of oxygen for patients with heart disease was confirmed by objective data.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Tele-endoscopy: influence of data compression, bandwidth and simulated impairments on the usability of real-time digital video endoscopy transmissions for medical diagnoses.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Real-time digital video transmission (rtDVT) at an acceptable quality through networks has been possible for several years. This technique can be used for telemedical applications, such as tele-endoscopy. The hypotheses of the present study were that the quality of real-time DVT depends on the technical equipment used, and that the resulting image quality influences the usability of the system for diagnostic purposes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An experimental network was established between two German referral endoscopy centers, using the Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) protocol. At first, rtDVTs of routine gastrointestinal video endoscopies were transferred through the network for prospective evaluation of the feasibility of the technical equipment and its usability for diagnostic tele-endoscopy, based on the video image quality. Secondly, the image quality and usability for correct telemedical diagnosis were evaluated prospectively in a double-blind experimental setting in relation to variations in the methods of data compression used, transmission bandwidths, and simulated transmission errors. Fourteen endoscopists evaluated 27 variations of an endoscopic video sequence. RESULTS: Compression with the Moving Picture Expert Group 2 (MPEG2 [4 : 2 : 2]) standard, the ATM protocol, and a bandwidth of 40 megabits per second (Mb/s) were used successfully in 40 routine tele-endoscopies for practical evaluation. Doctors were able to handle the system with ease, and its availability was 100%. There were no detectable differences between the original video image and the transferred image, and the images were usable for diagnosis in all cases. The set-up used clinically was therefore considered to provide the optimal conditions for comparisons in the experimental part of the study. Experimentally, any technical variation was found to cause a reduction in the overall image quality and hence a reduction in diagnostic usability: compression algorithm (MPEG2 [4 : 2 : 2] vs. others: P = 0.001), bandwidth (> or = 8 vs. < 8 Mb/s: P = 0.001), and error rate (10 (-8) vs. 10 (-7): P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: rtDVT using MPEG2 [4 : 2 : 2] compression and a bandwidth of 40 Mb/s did not effectively differ from the original video images in routine tele-endoscopy. The qualitative requirements in diagnostic video endoscopy, however, are obviously much higher than previously assumed, since experienced endoscopists detected a loss of image quality and a reduction in diagnostic usability with any reduction in the technical specification. Modern methods of data compression, broadband networks and a network protocol with good quality-of-service guarantees are therefore prerequisites for diagnostic rtDVT.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1998

A randomized trial of endoscopy vs no endoscopy in the management of seronegative Helicobacter pylori dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether endoscopy influences the management of Helicobacter pylori negative dyspepsia. AIM: To determine whether endoscopy alters health-care resource utilization, quality of life and symptom outcome in H. pylori seronegative dyspeptic patients aged under 45 years; and to determine which factors predict outcome of symptoms. METHOD: One hundred and fifty-four H. pylori seronegative subjects were randomized to have an endoscopy or no endoscopy before subsequent management by their GPs. Assessment was carried out at 6 months and supplementary information obtained at 12 months. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups for progression of dyspeptic symptoms (better, same and worse) at 6 months (47%, 46%, 7% vs 43%, 52%, 5%), and at 12 months (55%, 34%, 11% vs 57%, 28%, 15%). Prescriptions were lower in both groups at 6 and 12 months than on entry into the study, independent of endoscopy. Endoscopy did not influence quality of life, visits to GPs and days lost from work. Prognostic factors for symptom resolution at 6 months were lower severity of initial symptoms, non-smoking, non-Caucasians, less anxious patients and those not on acid suppressants. CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori negative dyspeptic patients aged under 45 years without sinister symptoms could be managed without the need of an endoscopy.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Imaging of small bowel disease: comparison of capsule endoscopy, standard endoscopy, barium examination, and CT.

Capsule endoscopy is a revolutionary new diagnostic tool for the detection of small bowel disease. As the name implies, capsule endoscopy makes use of a swallowable video capsule; as such, it is the only technique that allows noninvasive endoscopic examination of the entire small bowel without sedation. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding is the most common indication for capsule endoscopy, which commonly depicts arteriovenous malformations, small bowel tumors, and ulcers missed at standard endoscopy and imaging examinations. However, capsule endoscopy is not optimal for the localization of small bowel lesions. In addition, lesions can be missed due to poor bowel preparation, rapid or delayed small bowel transit, or orientation of the camera away from a lesion. Computed tomography and barium examinations are useful for detecting these missed lesions and for localizing lesions detected at capsule endoscopy. Other limitations of capsule endoscopy are the inability to treat lesions and its limited use in patients with small bowel strictures or obstruction. Nevertheless, this new technique is easy to perform, is well tolerated by patients, and, for the first time, allows noninvasive endoscopic evaluation of the entire small bowel.

Barium Sulfate↗
PubMed2000

Short-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists and prokinetics for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms and endoscopy negative reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Heartburn affects 25% of the adult population on a monthly basis and represents the core symptom of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Treatment is readily available and puts a large demand on healthcare budgets. Research in the past has focused largely on the treatment of oesophagitis. A majority of GORD patients show no endoscopic abnormalities and in daily practice most patients are treated empirically. OBJECTIVES: Summarise, quantify and compare the efficacy of the short-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) and prokinetics in the empirical treatment of GORD and the treatment of endoscopy negative reflux disease (ENRD). SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches were performed of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Bibliographies were screened. SELECTION CRITERIA: Included were randomised controlled trials focussing on symptomatic outcome after short-term treatment for GORD using proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists or prokinetic agents. Participants had to be classifiable in the empirical treatment group (no endoscopy used in treatment allocation) or in the endoscopy negative reflux disease group (no endoscopic signs of erosive oesophagitis). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data from included trials were extracted by two reviewers independently. The impact of interventions was expressed as relative risks (RR) together with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Meta-analysis was only performed if there were sufficient trials of similar comparisons reporting the same outcomes. Relative risks were combined for binary outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-one trials were included: eleven in the empirical treatment group, seven in the ENRD group and three in both. In empirical treatment of GORD the RR for heartburn remission in placebo-controlled trials for PPI was 0.35 (1 trial, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.46), for H2RAs 0.77 (2 trials, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.99) and for prokinetics 0.86 (1 trial, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.01). In direct comparison PPIs were significantly (p<0.05) more effective than H2RAs (3 trials, RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.80) and prokinetic's (2 trials, RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.87). In treatment of ENRD, RR for heartburn remission for PPI versus placebo was 0.68 (4 trials, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.88) and for H2RA versus placebo was 0.84 (2 trials, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.95). The RR for PPI versus H2RA was 0.69 (2 trials, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.20) and versus prokinetic 0.72 (1 trial, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.92). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this review suggest that antisecretory drugs are effective in the empirical treatment of complaints likely to originate from GORD and in treatment of ENRD and furthermore that PPIs are superior to H2RAs in empirical treatment of typical GORD symptoms.

Endoscopy, Digestive System↗
PubMed1993

Endoscopy, gastric ulcer, and gastric cancer. Follow-up endoscopy for all gastric ulcers?

The practice of following benign-appearing gastric ulcers until healing was critically evaluated in a retrospective manner by reviewing all gastric ulcers that were followed with serial endoscopy and all gastric cancers diagnosed at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. The stated purpose of following ulcers to healing is to detect those gastric cancers that may be masquerading as benign ulcer and were not correctly diagnosed at initial endoscopy. Over a five-year period, 148 gastric ulcers were followed with serial endoscopy and in no case was an unsuspected carcinoma found at follow-up endoscopy. In addition, of 67 gastric cancers diagnosed between 1979 and 1986, 62 were suspected of being malignant by the endoscopist at initial examination for an accuracy of 92%. The accuracy rate based solely on biopsy and/or brush cytology was 94%. When endoscopic and biopsy and/or cytology impressions were combined, only one case of gastric carcinoma was not suspected. The overall accuracy was 99%. These results suggest that if either the endoscopic impression or the biopsy and cytology is suspicious for malignancy, then follow-up endoscopy until healing should be done. On the other hand, if, at the initial examination, the ulcer appears benign and biopsy plus cytology are negative, then serial endoscopy has a low benefit relative to its cost.

Alabama↗
PubMed2006

Esophageal capsule endoscopy in patients refusing conventional endoscopy for the study of suspected esophageal pathology.

AIM: Esophageal capsule endoscopy is a well tolerated procedure that does not require sedation and has proved its value for the study of the esophagus. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility, accuracy, safety and acceptability of esophageal capsule endoscopy for the study of gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophageal varices in patients who refused conventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive examinations performed in 28 patients (15 men/13 women; mean age: 58.5+/-12.4 years; range: 23-87 years) were reviewed. Twenty-five examinations were performed in 23 patients presenting with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and the remaining five were carried out in patients with cirrhosis for screening of esophageal varices. The procedures were done with the new PillCam ESO that harbors two viewing cupules and takes a total of 14 frames/s. Technical data (total recording time, esophageal transit time and Z-line visualization), clinical findings (Savary-Miller grade; presence and characteristics of esophageal varices or portal hypertension gastropathy), and patient's opinion (quality and comfort questionnaire) were analyzed. RESULTS: All the patients ingested and excreted the capsule without complications. Two examinations in the gastroesophageal reflux disease group were repeated; one was issued as a follow-up and the other because no images were recorded in the first capsule endoscopy. From the former, only the satisfaction questionnaire was analyzed. Mean total recording time and esophageal transit time were 1224 and 243.79 s, respectively (range: 2-1192 s). Complete study of the Z-line was possible in 23 examinations (23/29; 79.3%). Esophageal erosions were seen in 58.33% (14/24) of the examinations carried out in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Nine out of 14 patients (64.29%) presented with grade I esophagitis and the other five (35.71%) with grade II esophagitis. Among the five patients with cirrhosis, small varices were visualized in one (1/5; 20%), while large varices with red spots were evidenced in the remaining three (3/5; 60%). All four patients showing esophageal varices were found to have portal hypertension gastropathy. In most examinations, patients found the capsule easy to swallow (28/30; 93.33%), asymptomatic (29/30; 96.66%), evaluated the procedure as comfortable (29/30; 96.66%), and would repeat it if necessary (30/30; 100%). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal capsule endoscopy is an adequate alternative diagnostic method for the study of gastroesophageal reflux disease and for the screening of esophageal varices in patients refusing to undergo conventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Aldehyde disinfectants and health in endoscopy units. British Society of Gastroenterology Endoscopy Committee.

Summary of main recommendations(1) Glutaraldehyde, used in most endoscopy units in the United Kingdom for the disinfection of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes, is a toxic substance being an irritant and a sensitiser; symptoms associated with glutaraldehyde exposure are common among staff working in endoscopy units.(2) The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 1988 (COSHH) obliges the employer to make a systematic assessment of risk to staff of exposure to glutaraldehyde and institute measures to deal effectively with exposure.(3) At present glutaraldehyde remains the first line agent for the disinfection of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. Other agents are being developed; a standard means of assessment for flexible endoscope disinfectants should be devised.(4) Equipment and accessories that are heat stable should be sterilised by autoclaving; disposable accessories should be used wherever possible.(5) Flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes should be disinfected within automated washer/disinfectors; trays, bowls or buckets for this purpose are unacceptable.(6) Local exhaust ventilation must be used to control glutaraldehyde vapour. Extracted air may be discharged direct to the atmosphere or passed over special absorbent filters and recirculated. Such control measures must be regularly tested and records retained.(7) Endoscope cleaning and disinfection should be carried out in a room dedicated to the purpose, equipped with control measures to maintain the concentration of glutaraldehyde vapour at a level certainly below the current occupational exposure standard of 0.2 ppm and preferably below the commonly used working limit of 0.1 ppm. Sites other than the endoscopy unit where endoscopy is regularly performed, such as the radiology department, should have their own fully equipped cleaning and disinfection room.(8) COSHH limits the use of personal protective equipment to those situations where other measures cannot adequately control exposure. Such equipment includes nitrile rubber gloves, apron, chemical grade eye protection, and respiratory protective equipment for organic vapours.(9) Monitoring of atmospheric levels of glutaraldehyde should be performed by a competent person such as an occupational hygienist; the currently preferred method of sampling uses a filtration technique, the commercially available meters being less reliable.(10) Health surveillance of staff is mandatory; occupational health records must be retained for 30 years.(11) Endoscopy staff must be informed of the risks of exposure to glutaraldehyde and trained in safe methods of its control. Only staff who have completed such an education and training programme should be allowed to disinfect endoscopes.(12) The unsafe use of glutaraldehyde has significant health and legal consequences; the safe use of glutaraldehyde may have revenue consequences that contribute significantly to the cost of gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Aldehydes↗
PubMed2002

Fluorescein electronic endoscopy: a novel method for detection of early stage gastric cancer not evident to routine endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Fluorescence endoscopy with fluorescein sodium in the stomach was evaluated by using a newly developed fluorescence electronic endoscopic system. METHODS: Sixteen patients with early stage gastric cancer diagnosed by white light endoscopy and chromoendoscopy underwent fluorescein electronic endoscopy before surgery. The resection specimens underwent thorough histopathologic evaluation. RESULTS: About 10 seconds after intravenous injection of fluorescein, fluorescence appeared and immediately spread throughout the gastric surface. A few minutes later, differentiated early stage gastric cancers with more abundant stroma than surrounding normal mucosa exhibited significantly stronger fluorescence, and those with less stroma exhibited weaker fluorescence than the surrounding normal mucosa. Undifferentiated early stage gastric cancers, in which the stroma became wider because foveolae were collapsed from malignant invasion, expressed stronger fluorescence intensity. In all cases, the borders of early stage gastric cancers were clearly demonstrated. Among the 16 patients, 6 accompanying flat lesions and 1 tiny lesion not evident by routine endoscopy were detected. The extent of the cancers, as determined by fluorescence endoscopy, were similar to those determined histopathologically. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescein electronic endoscopy is useful in determining the extent within the mucosa of gastric cancers when this is obscure by standard endoscopic observation, and for detecting extremely early stage cancer that is not evident by conventional endoscopic observation.

Contrast Media↗
PubMed1996

Gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients taking antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants: survey of ASGE members. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal endoscopy is often required in patients taking aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or anticoagulants. Because proper guidelines are lacking, we believe that most endoscopists use their own criteria and judgment for stopping and restarting these agents during the periendoscopic period, and the practice varies widely. The aim of our study was to identify these practices among ASGE members. METHODS: Questionnaires, each containing 22 questions with 157 responses, were sent to 3300 ASGE members, including all Gastroenterology Fellowship Program Directors. One thousand two hundred sixty-nine questionnaires were received and analyzed. RESULTS: Physicians stopped aspirin and NSAIDs more frequently before colonoscopy (81%) and ERCP (79%) than before upper endoscopy (51%) (p < 0.001). Ninety percent of physicians stopped aspirin and NSAIDs for 10 or fewer days. Only 20% of physicians performed sphincterotomy when aspirin and NSAIDs were not stopped compared with 88% and 85% (p < 0.001 for both) of physicians performing cold biopsies at esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy, respectively, and 77% and 69% performing hot biopsies for the same procedures (p < 0.001 for all compared with sphincterotomy). Depending on the indication for anticoagulation, 51% to 60% of physicians stopped warfarin before upper endoscopy; 71% to 82% before colonoscopy; and 26% to 51% of physicians used a "heparin window." All physicians restarted warfarin immediately after diagnostic endoscopy, whereas 80% restarted it 7 or fewer days after therapeutic endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a wide variation exists regarding the management of aspirin, NSAIDs, and anticoagulants in the periendoscopic period. There is a definite need for a consensus statement or guidelines for managing patients taking these agents.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2000

Remote clinical assessment of gastrointestinal endoscopy (tele-endoscopy): an initial experience.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is an effective tool to screen for cancers of the digestive tract. However, access to endoscopy is limited in many parts of South Carolina. This trial is a part of a prospective multi-part study for remote cancer screening in coastal South Carolina. This pilot study was to evaluate the quality of tele-endoscopy for cancer screening. METHODS: 10 patients scheduled for endoscopic procedures were observed simultaneously by the endoscopist and a remote observer connected over a 512 kbps ISDN line. Findings by both were compared for concordance on malignant or premalignant lesions. RESULTS: The image quality was adequate to support remote diagnosis of GI cancer and abnormal lesions by an experienced observer. However, assessment of the esophagogastric junction for Barrett's esophagus was equivocal. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our tele-endoscopy setup shows great promise for remote supervision or observation of endoscopic procedures done by nurse endoscopists. Tele-endoscopy is both adequate and feasible for diagnosis of most gastrointestinal lesions. Subtle lesions still may be missed in our current setup. However, improvements are being made in our setup to address the problem with resolution prior to further evaluation.

Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal↗
PubMed2002

Wireless capsule endoscopy -- beyond the frontiers of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Wireless capsule endoscopy is currently the outstanding technical innovation in diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy. Especially for small bowel diseases this new technique offers several potential advantages compared to traditional diagnostic tools. Capsule endoscopy is a painless procedure that can be performed as an ambulatory endoscopic examination. First experimental studies proved the good tolerance of the capsule endoscopy and the possibility of a complete visual investigation of the small bowel. Clinical studies demonstrated possible fields of application: Obscure chronic or intermittent gastrointestinal blood loss and inflammatory bowel disease. The major risk of the procedure - intestinal obstruction by the capsule - may hinder its use in the diagnosis of polyps or tumors in the small bowel. In the next years it will be exciting to see whether capsule endoscopy will finally reach the clinical significance we expect at the moment. Possibly, the diagnostic algorithm for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding has to be changed in the future due to the abandonment of less effective procedures.

Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal↗
PubMed1992

A prospective study of bidirectional endoscopy (colonoscopy and upper endoscopy) in the evaluation of patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding.

UNLABELLED: One hundred patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) (i.e., guaiac-positive stools and/or iron deficiency anemia) were prospectively evaluated with bidirectional endoscopy [upper endoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy] to determine the origin of occult bleeding. Predetermined criteria were used to prospectively define gastrointestinal bleeding sources. Among the 58 males and 42 females, the median age was 65 yr. Thirty-one percent of the group had gastrointestinal symptoms. Sixty-six percent of the study group were inpatients. Bidirectional endoscopy detected the source of OGIB in 53% of patients, with a positive finding on EGD of 36%, and with colonoscopy, of 26%. In only 9% of patients was a source of OGIB detected on both EGD and colonoscopy. Acid peptic disease accounted for the source of OGIB in 27%, colonic adenomas 14%, angiodysplasia 13%, colorectal carcinoma 6%, and gastric cancer in 1% of patients. The diagnostic yield was significantly higher with EGD than with colonoscopy in patients with anemia and guaiac-positive stools (45% vs. 26%, p less than 0.01). Upper endoscopy directed a change in patient management in 29 patients. IN CONCLUSION: for the patient population described in this study, bidirectional endoscopy determined the source of OGIB in 50%. As expected, colonoscopy resulted in a higher cancer detection rate than EGD--yet EGD detected the origin of OGIB in 68% (36/53) of patients found to have an occult bleeding source, and resulted in a therapeutic initiation or a change in therapy for 30% of all patients.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in endoscopy and non-endoscopy personnel: results of field survey with serology and 14C-urea breath test.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were, first, to determine the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (HP) among endoscopy personnel and a group of non-endoscopy volunteers and, second, to evaluate the usefulness of two noninvasive tests of diagnosis: serology and the urea breath test. METHODS: The two noninvasive methods of HP diagnosis, serology and 14C-urea breath test (UBT), were used in a cross-sectional survey of endoscopists, nurse-assistants, and non-endoscopy personnel. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-five volunteers were recruited for the study. In 116, results of the two tests were in agreement (kappa = 0.645). Further analysis was based on the results of the UBT. Endoscopy personnel (endoscopists and nurse-assistants) as a group had a significantly higher incidence of HP than did controls (32.9% vs. 11.3%; p = 0.004). The two groups were comparable with regard to mean age, sex, ethnic distribution, and social class. CONCLUSIONS: HP infection is more prevalent among endoscopy personnel. Both diagnostic tests (serology and UBT) were convenient and relatively simple to perform, and results gave a high level of agreement.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

CT evaluation of gastric lesions with three-dimensional display and interactive virtual endoscopy: comparison with conventional barium study and endoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) CT rendering using shaded-surface display (SSD) and ray sum display and virtual endoscopic images of the stomach for simultaneous evaluation of intraluminal and extraluminal abnormalities compared with conventional upper gastrointestinal barium studies and endoscopy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Our prospective study consisted of 39 patients with gastric lesions (17 gastric carcinomas, nine gastric polyps, five gastric varices, five gastric submucosal tumors, one lymphoma, one case of Menetrier's disease, and one gastric erosion) detected by endoscopy and barium study. All 3D CT images were reconstructed using SSD, ray sum display, and virtual endoscopic techniques. Three-dimensional images were evaluated for ability to reveal the range and morphologic features of the gastric lesions. RESULTS: All SSD, ray sum display, and virtual endoscopic images successfully revealed five of the eight early-stage gastric carcinomas and all nine advanced-stage gastric carcinomas. Submucosal tumors were revealed on 3D CT approximately as well as on conventional endoscopy. Interactive evaluation of virtual endoscopic images and multiplanar reconstructions provided useful information regarding intraluminal and submucosal gastric involvement by gastric varices, submucosal tumor, advanced gastric carcinomas, and lymphoma. This kind of information could not be obtained by conventional endoscopy or double-contrast study. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional CT used in conjunction with virtual CT endoscopy proved helpful in identifying gastric lesions. Also, virtual CT endoscopic images with the interactive display of multiplanar reconstructions proved useful in identifying both intraluminal and submucosal components.

Aged↗
PubMed1987

[Cost-benefit of upper digestive endoscopy. Frequency of early gastric cancer and negative endoscopy in relation to indications].

The increasing demand for upper gastrointestinal endoscopies (184% from 1974 to 1985) led to a review of cases in an attempt to improve the cost-benefit ratio of this diagnostic procedure (E.G.C.). Two parameters were evaluated: the frequency of early gastric cancers and, on the other hand, the incidence of negative endoscopic findings with respect to indications. The increase in the number of endoscopies performed was not matched by an increased frequency of E.G.C. diagnosed: 8.9% in 1974-1979 and 7.5% in 1980-1985 with an E.G.C./endoscopy ratio of 1:218 and 1:415 respectively; in the second period the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopy was enhanced from 42.8% to 100%. The overall frequency of negative endoscopic findings on 500 patients undergoing endoscopy in 1985, was 40.4%. The greatest number of negative findings was observed in patients with non-ulcerous dyspepsia under 50 years of age and in those with ulcerous dyspepsia with prior duodenal ulcer; on the other hand, a significant prevalence of cancerous and precancerous lesions was observed in patients over 50 with non-ulcerous dyspepsia. The results of this study suggest that patients over 50 years with non-ulcerous dyspepsia should receive early endoscopic investigation, in those under 50 an initial therapeutic approach appears reasonable. In the patients with prior duodenal ulcer endoscopy is of limited value for the assessment of response to therapy.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Clinical experience in airway endoscopy in children: an emphasis on the comparison between flexible and rigid endoscopy.

Congenital and acquired lesions of the pediatric airway frequently pose perplexing problems in children, infants and newborns. Prompt investigation into the etiology and early intervention are essential to decrease the morbidity and to prevent some tragic events. Endoscopy grants access to the lesion sites for either diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. From April 1994 to May 1997, totally 509 endoscopic procedures, including 292 flexible and 217 rigid endoscopic procedures were performed in 296 pediatric patients at National Taiwan University Hospital. For routine diagnostic procedures, the flexible fiberscope is the instrument of choice which should include a detailed examination of entire upper airway, as farther to tracheobronchi as possible. When flexible endoscopy fails to demonstrate the exact airway lesion or certain surgical manipulation is demanded, rigid endoscopy is favored. The indications for endoscopy were: stridor, respiratory distress, follow-up endoscopy or tracheostoma evaluation, feeding difficulty, hoarseness or weak voice, and suspicious airway foreign body. Common airway problems in serial orders were: laryngomalacia, subglottic stenosis, tracheo/bronchomalacia and airway foreign body. Nearly 20% of patients in this series had multiple synchronous airway lesions. There was no major complication in our 292 flexible endoscopic procedures. Two major complications attributed to endoscopic manipulations occurred in 217 rigid endoscopic procedures.

Adolescent↗