Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ELECTROSURGERY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

A comparative analysis of adhesion reduction, tissue effects, and incising characteristics of electrosurgery, CO2 laser, and Nd:YAG laser at operative laparoscopy: an animal study.

In this study, the relative efficacy and tissue effects of lasers and electrosurgery at operative laparoscopy were evaluated. Thirty rabbits underwent surgical procedures to create extensive intraperitoneal adhesions. The animals were then randomly assigned to laparoscopic adhesiolysis utilizing either electrosurgery, CO2 laser, or Nd:YAG laser exclusively for the assigned group. Each surgical tool was utilized at its optimal power density to achieve the best results. The depth of thermal injury on ovarian and uterine tissues, and the speed at which various segments of the uterine horn were transected were also compared. All three modalities significantly reduced (p < 0.01) intraperitoneal adhesions by approximately 50%. The depth of thermal injury was threefold greater with the Nd:YAG laser than either electrosurgery or the CO2 at both ovarian and uterine tissues (p < 0.001). The speed of transection across the uterine horn was significantly slower (p < 0.001) with the Nd:YAG (2.6 +/- 0.3 sec) than either the CO2 laser (1.4 +/- 0.2 sec) or electrosurgery (1.5 +/- 0.2 sec). From this study, the authors conclude that the Nd:YAG laser causes more tissue damage and is less efficient at incising tissue than either CO2 or electrosurgery, but that all three modalities are equally effective for laparoscopic adhesiolysis.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Electrosurgery in the gastroenterology suite: principles, practice, and safety.

An electrosurgery generator is a critical piece of equipment in any therapeutic endoscopy setting. Electrosurgery uses rapidly alternating current, provided by the electrosurgery generator, for both therapeutic cutting and coagulation of tissue. Basic variables important to electricity in general are also important to electrosurgery: current, voltage, circuit, and impedance (resistance). Monopolar and bipolar accessories (electrodes) are used in the endoscopy suite and these terms refer to the way in which the electric circuit is completed by the flowing current. Impedance resists current flow and changes with tissue type and degree of therapeutic coagulation. Waveforms are the high-frequency output selected by the operator when using an electrosurgery generator. Waveforms may be continuous or interrupted (modulated) and differ in voltage and degree of modulation. Certain waveforms are typically chosen for particular applications or accessories, such as polypectomy with a snare, because of predictable tissue-effect attributes of that waveform. Safe application of grounding pads, careful management of active accessories, and good care of electrosurgical equipment are crucial to patient and operator safety.

Contraindications↗
PubMed2001

Electrosurgery in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery: principles, advances, and complications.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Electrosurgical instruments are routinely used in many applications by otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeons; and a complete description of their historical development, physics of operation, histological effects, and technological advancements is necessary for our specialty to take full advantage of this instrumentation. Because of the electrical current, heat production, and common use associated with these instruments, compounded by the complex environments in which they are used, potential complications must be considered and are likely underreported in the literature. This thesis describes the important aspects of electrosurgery along with a study of complications so otolaryngologists can use these instruments to their fullest potential while limiting complications. STUDY DESIGN: National survey of electrosurgical complications. METHODS: A survey addressing potential complications of electrosurgery was developed based on a review of the electrosurgical and complications literature. The electrosurgical complications were organized in the following categories: 1) unanticipated direct burns as a result of the active electrode contacting some tissue unintentionally; 2) unintentional burns as a result of capacitive coupling where radiofrequency (RF) current passes through a metallic instrument (such as forceps) and burns tissue in contact with that metallic instrument; 3) fires occurring as a result of electrosurgical instruments; 4) electromagnetic interference with a pacemaker, defibrillator, or cardiac monitoring device; and 5) other complications not included in the previous categories. The survey was mailed to the 620 members of the Society of University of Otolaryngologists. RESULTS: Of the 620 surveys mailed, 35 were returned by the post office for lack of a forwarding address and 296 were returned completed for a response rate of 49.7%. The respondents performed a total of 99,664 cases in the previous year. During that year, 324 complications related to electrosurgical instruments were reported. These included 219 unanticipated direct burns, 48 burns as a result current flow through a metallic retractor or instrument (capacitative coupling), 13 grounding pad burns, 11 fires, 32 cases of electromagnetic interference, and 1 hair loss at an incision site as a result of a cutting electrosurgical instrument. Information regarding the circumstances surrounding these complications and outcome are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Electrosurgery has proliferated since its original application by William T. Bovie and Harvey Cushing in the 1920s. Because surgeons use this technology frequently, a thorough understanding of these instruments and their potential complications is critical to their safe and successful use. Electrosurgical units operate on basic fundamental principles of physics and involve the passage of electrical current through tissue to create the desired tissue effect. With knowledge of the history, physics, techniques, histological effects, and safety issues of electrosurgery, the field will continue to proliferate and electrosurgery will continue to assist surgeons in alleviating human suffering.

Alopecia↗
PubMed1987

Electrosurgery in operative arthroscopy.

Electrosurgery is a useful tool in the orthopedic procedures outlined, including lateral release, synovial lesions, and shoulder impingement syndrome. The salient positive characteristic of electrosurgery is the capacity to obtain immediate and thorough hemostasis, thereby allowing the patient to begin a rehabilitative program far sooner than with conventional operative techniques. Less hemarthrosis also lowers the level of postoperative pain and the risk of postoperative infection. By becoming familiar with some of the basics of electrosurgery, including equipment and electrosurgical principles, the surgeon and staff can better utilize electrosurgery and be aware of the potential, yet avoidable, complications. The future appears bright for electrosurgery, with new equipment and procedures being developed, but more research is needed to clarify the long-term effects on tissues involved and the clinical results of patients.

Arthroscopy↗
PubMed1993

Laser vs electrosurgery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective randomized trial.

While much of the clamor over the optimal instrument for dissection of the gallbladder from the liver bed has died, there remain no prospective comparative data concerning this issue. We undertook a prospective randomized trial comparing the contact neodymium:YAG laser with monopolar electrosurgical dissection in 100 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Electrosurgical dissection was performed with an "L" hook and spatula electrodes at 25 W coagulation current. Neodymium:YAG laser dissection was performed with a 1200-microns contact tip at 15 W continuous beam. Mean (+/- SD) gallbladder dissection time was 19.2 +/- 8.5 minutes with electrosurgery compared with 23.6 +/- 9.6 minutes with the laser. Estimated blood loss was significantly less in the electrosurgery-treated group. In six instances, laser malfunction or fiber fragmentation necessitated completing the dissection with electrosurgery. We conclude that electrosurgery appears to have significant advantages for dissection of the gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Aluminum Silicates↗
PubMed1979

A method to measure operating variables in electrosurgery.

Variables affecting tissue response to electrosurgical wounding have been identified and discussed. An electronic measuring device was designed and built to record actual power generated at the active electrode during surgical use of an electrosurgery instrument. In addition, this electronic device measures the amount of time the active electrode is in contact with tissue. Coupled with an electrosurgery unit producing a documented waveform and an electrosurgery electrode having a controlled-depth gauge, variables affecting tissue response to electrosurgery wounding may be measured.

Electricity↗
PubMed1983

Subjacent heat production during tissue excision with electrosurgery.

A study was designed to document heat production subjacent to tissue excision by electrosurgery. In Phase I of the study, 20 electrosurgery excisions were made with a loop electrode in the palatal mucosa of miniature swine. Subjacent heat production was measured with implantation thermistors. Temperature measurements adjacent to 20 single incisions made with a needle electrode were used for comparison. Energy used and duration of active electrode contact with the tissue were recorded for each procedure with an electronic measuring device. In Phase II, 20 sets of excisions consisting of three successive excisions were performed. The following intraexcisional cooling periods were used for four sets each: 1 second, 5 seconds, 8 seconds, 10 seconds, and 15 seconds. Results indicate that single electrosurgery excisions with a loop electrode generate more energy than incisions made with a needle electrode. Subjacent heat production, however, is not significantly different. Cooling intervals of at least 15 seconds between successive electrosurgery excisions made with a loop electrode are necessary to prevent heat build-up of a magnitude capable of initiating destructive alveolar changes.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Detailed prostatic interstitial thermal mapping during transurethral grooved rollerball electrovaporization and loop electrosurgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the detailed pattern of prostatic interstitial temperature change during rollerball electrovaporization and loop electrosurgery in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: Four patients with symptomatic BPH necessitating prostate surgery were subjected to rollerball electrovaporization on one side of their prostate glands, as well as contralateral loop electrosurgery. Continuous temperature readings were recorded from 20 to 24 interstitially implanted fiber-optic thermosensors using a novel stereotactic thermal mapping technique. Ultrasound and video endoscopic visualization were used to evaluate and quantify the spatial relationship between the thermosensors and the rollerball or loop. RESULTS: The patterns of temperature change during rollerbal electrovaporization and loop electrosurgery were substantially similar. Temperatures decreased steeply and significantly with increasing distance from both the rollerball (P < 0.001) and loop (P < 0.001). Marked mean temperature increases occurred at 1 to 2 mm from both the rollerball (30.8 degrees C, 95% confidence interval [CI] 27.8 to 33.8 degrees C) and loop (34.8 degrees C, 95% CI 24.0 to 45.6 degrees C), and temperatures at this distance were significantly higher than those at greater distances (P < 0.05). At 3 to 5 mm, the mean temperature increases declined by 58% for the rollerball and 68% for the loop. Further declines of 68% and 63%, respectively, were observed at 6 to 10 mm, and at distances exceeding 10 mm the temperature changes were minimal (0.5 degree C [95% CI 0.3 to 0.8 degree C] for the rollerball and 0.5 degree C [95% CI 0.1 to 0.8 degree C] for the loop). There was no change in temperature at any of the thermosensors near the neurovascular bundles and rectum. CONCLUSIONS: The patterns of temperature change with rollerball electrovaporization and loop electrosurgery are closely similar. Interstitial temperature changes during use of the rollerball and loop are transient and highly localized, posing minimal risk of unintended thermal damage to adjacent tissues, including the neurovascular bundles and rectum.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

The status of electrosurgery in dermatologic practice.

A survey was made of the electrosurgical practices of the members of the American Society of Dermatologic Surgery. Results showed that the majority prefer the traditional electrosurgical units, with the Hyfrecator (Birtcher Corp.) being by far the most popular. The most common forms of high-frequency electrosurgery are electrocoagulation and electrodesiccation. Very few dermatologists use cutting current, although many own machines with this capability. The majority do not use a strict sterile technic when performing electrosurgery. However, there appears to be an increasing awareness of contamination risks, and many dermatologists have started using disposable or sterilizable treatment electrodes. High-frequency electrosurgery is by far the most common method of electrosurgery. Electrocautery and surgical galvanism are very rarely used.

Dermatology↗
PubMed2000

Common myths about electrosurgery.

The electrosurgery device market is lucrative and highly competitive. Several device manufacturers exist, and many creative techniques are used to differentiate products. Some device manufacturers make claims in marketing campaigns that are difficult to reconcile with the laws of physics or basic physiology. The variety of claims may be confusing to surgeons desiring to purchase new electrosurgical products. Understanding a few basic principles of electrosurgery physics can allow a surgeon to be a more informed consumer of electrosurgical products. This article discusses the basic physics of electrosurgery and then addresses several common misconceptions about electrosurgery and electrosurgical devices.

Electrosurgery↗
PubMed1995

Treating vaginal and external anogenital condylomas with electrosurgery vs CO2 laser ablation.

Our objective was to assess the technical characteristics, side effects, complications, and effectiveness of electrosurgery vs continuous wave CO2 laser in the treatment of genital warts. This open clinical trial was made up of 208 evaluable patients (135 women and 73 men) with vaginal and external anogenital condylomas. To avoid selection bias, in each patient half of the lesions measuring 2 cm2 or greater total linear area were treated with loop electroexcision and ball electrofulguration, and the other half were treated with CO2 laser excision and vaporization in a continuous wave mode spot welding. All patients were followed for at least 6 months (maximum 18 months, mean 8 months) after the last treatment received. The average operative time was 6 min for electrosurgery and 8 min for laser. Healing was completed in 95% of patients with a lesional area of 5 cm2 or less and 100% of patients with 5 cm2 or larger by the third and sixth postoperative week, respectively. Severe discomfort occurred in 12% of patients, and 4% of patients developed delayed complications, including vitiligo and scarring, irrespective of treatment modalities used. Complete clearance of warts in women and men after a single (51% and 38%) and multiple (75% and 64%) treatments were similar in areas treated with electrosurgery and CO2 laser. Electrosurgery appears to be as effective as continuous wave CO2 laser for treating vaginal and external anogenital condylomas, particularly those limited to a 5 cm2 or less area.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

A comparison of monopolar electrosurgery to a new multipolar electrosurgical system in a rat model.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study is to compare collateral tissue damage and wound healing in incisions created by electro-dissociation and conventional electrosurgery. Conventional electrosurgery has been used as an alternative to the scalpel to improve hemostasis. However, the heat generated by this instrument can cause tissue damage surrounding the incision, limiting its use around nerves and large blood vessels. A new technology, Coblation (Arthrocare Corp., Sunnyvale, CA), uses "electro-dissociation" to achieve similar results by creating charged particles from a conductive medium to make an incision while simultaneously achieving hemostasis. This new approach to electrosurgery may reduce soft tissue damage. STUDY DESIGN METHODS: Two prospective, matched design experiments were performed. In experiment I, both devices were set at the same electrical power in watts and then used to create an incision on the tongue of rats. In experiment II, the electrical power settings of both devices were adjusted until they created incisions of the same size. Epithelial destruction and collateral tissue damage were measured in histologically prepared tissue in both experiments, and the wound healing process was observed in experiment II at 0, 3, 7, and 14 days after surgery. RESULTS: The results showed that the electro-dissociation method created significantly less epithelial destruction and collateral tissue damage in both experiments. Granulation tissue formation was also significantly less extensive in the electrodissociation-induced incision after 7 and 14 days of recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Wound healing may be faster than with conventional electrosurgery if the Coblation device is used.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Electrosurgery after cochlear implantation: eighth nerve electrophysiology.

HYPOTHESIS: Monopolar electrosurgery below the neck in cochlear implant recipients can be performed without damage to the internal cochlear stimulator, electrode array, and the cochlear nerve. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective pre- and postintervention electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) study of cochlear nerve function and behavioral sound perception assessment. METHODS: Neural response telemetry (NRT) was used to measure ECAPs before and after the use of monopolar electrosurgery during coronary artery bypass surgery to assess prosthetic device function and electrophysiologic function of the cochlear nerve. In addition, electrode voltage impedances and behavioral sound perception was measured at the same time intervals. RESULTS: ECAPs, behavioral sound perception, and electrode voltage impedances were within the normal range, within compliance, and similar preoperatively and on postoperative day 6. CONCLUSION: The studies reported herein were a series of measurements designed to test neural integrity and prosthetic device function before and after the use of monopolar electrosurgery. With appropriate precautions, use of monopolar electrosurgery below the neck in cochlear implant recipients can be performed safely.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗
PubMed2001

Histological evaluation of electrosurgery and formocresol pulpotomy techniques in primary teeth in dogs.

The purpose of this study was to compare pulpal and periapical tissue reactions to electrosurgery versus formocresol pulpotomy techniques in the primary teeth of dogs. The study was conducted on 33 primary teeth of three mongrel dogs between the ages of one to three months. Each dog had three teeth treated by Formocresol Pulpotomy with Mechanical Coronal Pulp Removal (FC), three teeth treated by Electrosurgery Pulpotomy with Mechanical Coronal Pulp Removal (ES/MCPR), three teeth treated by Electrosurgery Pulpotomy with Electrosurgical Coronal Pulp Removal (ES/ECPR), and two teeth serving as untreated Controls. Dogs one, two and three were sacrificed performing the pulpotomies at two, four and six weeks, respectively. The pulp, periapical tissue and after surrounding bone were submitted to histological examination and the histological reaction was recorded. The results were fourteen out of 18 unfavorable and zero out of three favorable histological reactions occurred in the FC treated teeth. Six out of 18 unfavorable and one out of three favorable histological reactions occurred in the ES/MCPR treated teeth. Nine out of 18 unfavorable and two out of three favorable histological reactions occurred in the ES/ECPR treated teeth. One out of 18 unfavorable and zero out of three favorable histological reactions occurred in the untreated Control teeth. The conclusion of this study is that of the three experimental groups, the teeth treated by Electrosurgery Pulpotomy with either Mechanical or Electrosurgical Coronal Pulp Removal exhibited less histopathological reaction than the teeth treated by Formocresol Pulpotomy.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Inflammatory response and tissue trauma in laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparison of electrosurgery and harmonic scalpel.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to quantify and compare clinical outcome and surgical inflammatory response and tissue trauma after laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign disorder which was performed by electrosurgery or harmonic scalpel. METHODS: Sixty patients scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy were selected according to patient preference to undergo either electrosurgery or an ultrasonic operative technique. Blood samples for assay of markers of tissue trauma (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, creatine kinase, white blood cell count) were taken preoperatively, on the first and third postoperative day. Three patients with intraoperative complications or incomplete records were excluded from tissue analysis. RESULTS: No differences were present in the demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes (blood loss, uterine weight, operating time and hospital stay) in 57 uncomplicated laparoscopic hysterectomies. Both electrosurgery (n = 36) and use of the harmonic scalpel (n = 21) resulted in statistically significant changes in the inflammatory and systemic immune response in comparison with preoperative values. No significant differences were observed in the studied inflammatory and tissue markers (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, creatine kinase and white blood cells) between the compared groups. CONCLUSION: The harmonic scalpel and electrosurgery in laparoscopic hystsrectomy were equally traumatic in terms of surgical inflammatory response and tissue trauma.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Cutaneous electrosurgery in a patient with a deep brain stimulator.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulators are implantable devices with electrical activity used to treat certain movement disorders such as essential tremor and Parkinson's disease. Similar to implantable cardiac devices, use of electrosurgery on patients with these devices may produce adverse effects. CASE REPORT: We describe the effects of electrosurgery on a patient with essential tremor and an implantable deep brain stimulator who required Mohs micrographic surgery to excise a basal cell carcinoma. The patient experienced immediate lancinating "electrical shock" using electrosurgery in the monopolar mode. The patient experienced no discomfort when a bipolar electrosurgical device was used or when his deep brain stimulator was "turned off." Appropriate positioning of the dispersive plate also reduced adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Dermatologic surgeons should be aware of patients with devices implanted in the CNS with electrical activity and proceed with caution when using electrosurgery. Different approaches can be utilized to help reduce adverse effects.

Aged↗
PubMed1985

Use of electrosurgery in blepharoplasty.

The use of electrosurgery in blepharoplasty is controversial. The reluctance to use this technique may be related to a misunderstanding of the principles of electrosurgery and to uncertainty about its physical effects on local tissues. On the basis of a review of the physics of electrosurgery, our personal technique, and our clinical results, we feel the method is safe and may offer several advantages over traditional techniques.

Electrosurgery↗
PubMed1994

Monopolar electrosurgery and Nd:YAG Contact Laser in laparoscopic intestinal surgery.

In a prospective randomized study using a canine model, we compared the use of monopolar electrosurgery (EC) (n = 23) and the Nd:YAG Contact Laser (CL) (n = 21) on intra- and postoperative morbidity in laparoscopic large-bowel resection. In EC, cutting was performed with scissors and coagulation was performed with electrosurgery. In CL, cutting and coagulation were carried out with the Nd:YAG Contact Laser. Laparoscopic oncologic right colectomy with intraperitoneal ileocolic stapled anastomosis was performed in all dogs. Intraoperative smoke development, difficulty of dissection, hemostasis, and postoperative adhesions were judged using a five-point score. Two weeks after surgery, all dogs were sacrificed and zoopsy was carried out. Three dogs died postoperatively from pneumonia and one from an anastomotic leak. There were no other postoperative complications. Operative time was 135 min (range 105-180) in the CL group and 145 min (range 60-210) in the EC group. Intraoperative smoke development, difficulty of dissection, and postoperative amount of adhesions were not different between groups (P > 0.05). Hemostasis in the CL group (median score of 1, range 1-2) was significantly better (P = 0.01) than in the EC group (median score of 2, range 1-5). Scissors and electrosurgery as well as Nd:YAG Contact Laser can be used successfully in intestinal laparoscopic surgery. Although the use of the Contact Laser did not cause less postoperative morbidity than the conventional method, there was significantly better hemostasis using the Nd: YAG Contact Laser.

Animals↗