Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Docetaxel”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

The development of docetaxel (Taxotere) in non-small cell lung cancer--docetaxel in new combinations and new schedules: an overview of ongoing and future developments.

Non-small cell lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in the western world. Non-small cell lung cancer is modestly sensitive to chemotherapy with a small survival benefit in locally advanced and metastatic disease. Newer agents such as docetaxel are yielding encouraging response rates both as single agents and in combination. A phase I/II study is in progress in our institution to determine the maximum tolerated dose and noncomparative efficacy of the combination of docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France), ifosfamide, and cisplatin, with mesna and lenograstim support, in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. To date, nine patients have received 37 cycles of treatment at increasing dose levels (no intrapatient dose escalation). Treatment was administered to patients on an inpatient basis every 3 weeks, with lenograstim on days 3 to 10. Dose-limiting toxicity has not occurred at levels I to III (dose level III: docetaxel 75 mg/m2, cisplatin 75 mg/m2, and ifosfamide 3 g/m2). These preliminary results suggest that the combination of docetaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin, with lenograstim support, is well tolerated in the doses evaluated. Preliminary efficacy results show a response rate of 67% (six of nine patients). The study continues to determine the maximum tolerated dose of this regimen in preparation for a phase II evaluation.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗

A randomised phase II trial of docetaxel vs docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with stage IIIb-IV non-small-cell lung cancer who failed first-line treatment.

Response rate and toxicity of second-line therapy with docetaxel (75 mg m(-2)) or docetaxel, irinotecan, and lenogastrim (60 mg m(-2), 200 mg m(-2), and 150 microg m(-2) day(-1), respectively) were compared in 108 patients with stage IIIb-IV non-small-cell lung cancer. Addition of irinotecan to docetaxel does not improve response rate, and increases gastrointestinal toxicity.

Adolescent↗

Docetaxel versus docetaxel plus cisplatin as front-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, multicenter phase III trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with docetaxel plus cisplatin (DC) or docetaxel (D) alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either DC (n = 167; docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) on day 1, cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 2, and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) 150 microg/m(2)/d on days 3 to 9) or D (n = 152; 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 without rhG-CSF) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: The overall response rates were 36.5% for DC (three complete responses and 58 partial responses) and 21.7% for D (one complete response and 32 partial responses; P =.004). The median OS was 10.5 months (range, 0.5 to 41 months) and 8.0 months (range, 0.5 to 41 months) for DC and D, respectively (P =.200). The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 44% and 19% for DC and 43% and 15% for D, respectively. Median times to tumor progression were 4.0 and 2.5 months for DC and D, respectively (P =.580). Grade 2/3 anemia was significantly higher with DC than with D (33% v 16%; P =.0001). Fifteen (9%) DC and 12 (8%) D patients developed febrile neutropenia. Grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting (P =.0001), diarrhea (P =.007), neurotoxicity (P =.017), and nephroroxicity (P =.006) were significantly more common with DC than with D. There were five treatment-related deaths in the DC group and one in the D (P =.098). CONCLUSION: DC regimen resulted in a higher response rate but without improvement in median time to tumor progression or OS compared with D. D could be a reasonable front-line chemotherapy for patients who cannot tolerate cisplatin.

Adult↗

[Early phase II clinical study of RP56976 (docetaxel) in patients with primary pulmonary cancer. Docetaxel Cooperative Study Group for Lung Cancer].

An early phase II clinical study of RP56976 (Docetaxel), a new anticancer agent of plant origin, was conducted in patients with primary pulmonary cancer as a multicentered study involving 28 Japanese institutions. Docetaxel was administered at an intravenous dose of 60 mg/m2 based on the results of a phase I clinical study, and efficacy and safety were examined. Of the 65 patients enrolled, 57 patients were evaluated to have completed the scheduled course of treatment by the Evaluation Committee. The antitumor effect in patients with non-small cell lung cancer was 21.4% (9/42). In patients not previously treated, the antitumor effect was 30.0% (6/20), in patients previously treated the antitumor effect was 13.6% (3/22), and in 13.3% (2/15) of patients with small cell lung cancer. This shows that docetaxel had an efficacy for non-small cell lung cancer. Hematological adverse reactions included leukopenia and neutropenia of Grade III or more as specified in the Adverse Event Reporting Form proposed by the Japan Society for Cancer Therapy in 53.3% (32/60) and 78.3% (47/60) patients, respectively. Other major adverse reactions included alopecia and anorexia. Neurological symptoms developed at a low frequency and were mild in severity.

Adult↗

Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Early Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel Versus an Anthracycline-Free Regimen With Docetaxel, Cyclophosphamide-Results From a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains an important side effect despite new antiemetic drugs. This study tried to understand the occurrence of CINV in patients receiving two different chemotherapy regimens. As part of the randomized controlled clinical trial SUCCESS C (NCT00847444), 1582 of the 3463 patients completed CINV diaries. Patients were randomized to receive either chemotherapy with FEC (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel) or TC (docetaxel, cyclophosphamide). CINV was evaluated hourly using a specially designed questionnaire. Endpoints of the study were complete response (no emesis) and total control (no nausea and no emesis) and were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses over three chemotherapy cycles. Eight hundred fourteen patients received FEC and 768 received TC; patients and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. Patients receiving FEC had significantly more nausea and vomiting, with the main difference in the first 12 h. In the first cycle, the 0-12-h nausea/emesis-free rates were 70%/41% for FEC and 91/76% for TC. By 24 h after chemotherapy, the rates were 65%/33% (FEC) and 85%/60% (TC). The differences were similar in cycles 2 and 3. The detailed analysis of CINV in the study is unique and paves the way for modern CINV analysis of new therapeutics such as antibody-drug conjugates.

Adult↗

Phase II study of bi-weekly docetaxel and carboplatin with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy with docetaxel plus carboplatin for stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Docetaxel and carboplatin (DC) have demonstrated activity as radiation sensitizers in pre-clinical studies. The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of DC with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) followed by consolidation chemotherapy with DC for stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three previously untreated patients with inoperable, locally advanced (LA) NSCLC received docetaxel 30 mg/m2 over 1 h and carboplatin at an AUC of 3 every 2 weeks for six courses--four courses during concurrent chemoradiotherapy and two courses following completion of radiotherapy. Concurrent TRT was performed in 2-Gy daily fractions to a total dose of 60 Gy. RESULTS: Among 32 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 91%, with two complete responses (CR) and 27 partial responses (PR). Median survival time by intention-to-treat analysis was 27 months, with survival rates of 76% at 1 year and 61% at 2 years. Serious side effects were generally limited to grade 3 neutropenia in 6%, grades 3 and 4 pulmonary toxicity in 6 and 3%, respectively, and grade 3 esophagitis in 3% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: DC with concurrent TRT followed by consolidation chemotherapy was highly active with manageable toxicity in patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC.

Adult↗

Doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel every 21 days compared with doxorubicin and docetaxel every 14 days as preoperative treatment in operable breast cancer: the GEPARDUO study of the German Breast Group.

PURPOSE: Dose-dense and sequential administration of cytotoxic drugs are current approaches to improve outcomes in patients with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS: This phase III study investigated 913 women with untreated operable breast cancer (T2-3, N0-2, M0) randomly assigned to receive either doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 14 days for four cycles with filgrastim support (ADOC), or doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 21 days followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 21 days for four cycles each (AC-DOC). The primary end point was the incidence of pathologic complete (invasive and noninvasive) response (pCR) in the breast and axillary nodes. Secondary end points were predictors for pCR, clinical response, rate of breast conservation, and safety. RESULTS: A pCR was achieved in 94 patients (10.6%), but the likelihood was significantly greater with AC-DOC (14.3%; n = 63) than with ADOC (7.0%; n = 31) (odds ratio, 2.22; 90% CI, 1.52 to 3.24; P < .001). Independent predictors of attaining a pCR included the use of sequential therapy, high tumor grade, and negative hormone receptor status. The response rates detected by palpation and by imaging were significantly higher with AC-DOC (85.0% and 78.6%, respectively) than with ADOC (75.2% and 68.6%, respectively; both P values < .001). The rate of breast-conserving surgery was 63.4% for AC-DOC and 58.1% for ADOC (P = .05). Predominant grade 3/4 toxicities were leucopenia (AC-DOC, 74.2%; ADOC, 53.7%) and neutropenia (AC-DOC, 66.4%; ADOC, 44.7%) but were infrequently associated with fever (AC-DOC, 4.6%; ADOC, 3.1%). CONCLUSION: Sequential AC-DOC is more effective at inducing pCR than dose-dense ADOC as preoperative treatment for patients with operable breast cancer.

Adult↗

Orally active docetaxel analogue: synthesis of 10-deoxy-10-C-morpholinoethyl docetaxel analogues.

To improve cytotoxicity of 10-deoxy-10-C-morpholinoethyl docetaxel analogues against various tumor cell lines including resistant cells expressing P-glycoprotein (P-gp), we modified the 7-hydroxyl group to hydrophobic groups (methoxy, deoxy, 6,7-olefin, alpha-F, 7-beta-8-beta-methano, fluoromethoxy). Among these analogues, the 7-methoxy analogue showed the strongest cytotoxicity. This analogue showed potent activity against B16 melanoma BL6 in vivo by oral administration.

Administration, Oral↗

Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer: docetaxel followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (T/EC), or the reverse sequence (EC/T), every 2 weeks, versus docetaxel, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (TEC) every 3 weeks. AERO B03 randomized phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Adding a taxane to anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy prolongs survival in node-positive patients but optimal dose and schedule remain undetermined. This study aimed to select a dose-dense regimen for further assessment in phase III studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-nine patients with node-positive invasive breast adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to docetaxel (Taxotere) (T) 75 mg/m2, epirubicin (E) 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide (C) 500 mg/m2 (TEC)x6, every 3 weeks; E 100 mg/m2, C 600 mg/m2 x 4, then T 100 mg/m2 x 4 (EC-->T) or the reverse sequence (T-->EC), every 2 weeks, with pegfilgrastim support. The primary end point was the incidence of grade 4 toxicity. RESULTS: Dose intensity was almost doubled with dose-dense regimens, compared with TEC. Twenty-seven patients experienced grade 4 toxicity: 26%, 40% and 18% with TEC, EC-->T and T-->EC, respectively, mainly neutropenia, but febrile neutropenia occurred only in 11%, 10% and 3%. Grade 3-4 nail disorders, hand-foot syndrome and peripheral neuropathy occurred in 46%, 73% and 68% of patients with TEC, EC-->T and T-->EC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dose-dense regimens yield more frequent and severe nonhematological toxic effects than standard dose TEC regimen. Though grade 4 toxicity rates appear acceptable with the T-->EC regimen, the incidence of grade 3-4 events makes it difficult to recommend either dose-dense regimen for further investigation.

Adult↗

Induction docetaxel and carboplatin followed by weekly docetaxel and carboplatin with concurrent radiotherapy, then surgery in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a Phase I study.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of docetaxel (DOC) in combination with carboplatin (CAR) and thoracic radiotherapy (RT), in the setting of trimodality treatment of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Thirty-two patients with biopsy-proven stage IIIA (n = 20) or IIIB (n = 12) NSCLC were given two initial cycles of CAR (area under the curve = 6) and DOC (75 mg/m(2)), subsequent RT (54 Gy) with concurrent weekly CAR (area under the curve = 2), and DOC at six dose levels from 10 to 40 mg/m(2), then surgery if the patient's disease was resectable. RESULTS: Three patients did not complete induction computed tomography (CT). Twenty-nine patients received concurrent CT/RT. Fifteen patients were eligible for surgery. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 2 patients, at dose levels two (atrial fibrillation) and three (transaminitis). The maximum-tolerated dose, as defined by the protocol, was not reached, although grade 3 and 4 toxicities were encountered at all dose levels. The most common more than or equal to grades 3 toxicities were neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. Four patients (13.3%) responded to induction CT. Ten patients (38.5%) responded to CT/RT. Eight surgical patients (57.1%) were downstaged, including 3 pathologic complete responses. Median relapse free and overall survivals are 8.5 and 12 months. One-year and estimated 2-year survival rates are 56.3 and 34.3%. CONCLUSION: This new regimen for stage III NSCLC of induction CAR/DOC, then weekly CAR/DOC with concurrent RT followed by surgery, can be safely administered and offers encouraging results. DOC at 30 mg/m(2) in combination with CAR and RT is recommended for Phase II study.

Aged↗

Docetaxel and hyperthermia: factors that modify thermal enhancement.

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermia enhances the cytotoxicity of some chemotherapeutic agents and recent studies suggest that docetaxel may show improved response at elevated temperatures. Factors that may modify the thermal enhancement of docetaxel were studied to optimize its clinical use with hyperthermia. METHODS: The tumor studied was an early-generation isotransplant of a spontaneous C3Hf/Sed mouse fibrosarcoma, Fsa-II. All studies were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee. Docetaxel was given as a single intraperitoneal injection. Hyperthermia was achieved by immersing the tumor-bearing foot into a constant temperature water bath. Four factors were studied: duration of hyperthermia, sequencing of hyperthermia with docetaxel, intensity of hyperthermia, and tumor size. To study duration of hyperthermia tumors were treated at 41.5 degrees C for 30 or 90 min immediately after intraperitoneal administration of docetaxel. For sequencing of hyperthermia and docetaxel, animals received hyperthermia treatment of tumors for 30 min at 41.5 degrees C immediately after drug administration, hyperthermia both immediately and 3 hr after docetaxel administration and hyperthermia given only at 3 hr after administration of docetaxel. Intensity of hyperthermia was studied using heat treatment of tumors for 30 min at 41.5 or 43.5 degrees C immediately following docetaxel administration. Effect of tumor size was studied by delaying experiments until three times the tumor volume (113 mm(3)) was observed. Treatment of tumors lasted for 30 min at 41.5 degrees C immediately following drug administration. Tumor response was studied using the mean tumor growth time. RESULTS: Hyperthermia in the absence of docetaxel had a small but significant effect on tumor growth time at 43.5 degrees C but not at 41.5 degrees C. Hyperthermia at 41.5 degrees C for 90 min immediately after docetaxel administration significantly increased mean tumor growth time (P = 0.0435) when compared to tumors treated with docetaxel at room temperature. Treatment for 30 min had no effect. Application of hyperthermia immediately and immediately plus 3 hr following docetaxel was effective in delaying tumor growth. Treatment at 3 hr only had no effect. No significant difference in mean tumor growth time was observed with docetaxel and one half hour of hyperthermia at 41.5 or 43.5 degrees C. For larger tumors, hyperthermia alone caused a significant delay in tumor growth time. Docetaxel at 41.5 degrees C for 30 min did not significantly increase mean tumor growth time compared to large tumors treated with docetaxel at room temperature. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel shows a moderate increase in anti-tumor activity with hyperthermia. At 41.5 degrees C the thermal enhancement of docetaxel is time dependent if hyperthermia is applied immediately following drug administration. With large tumors docetaxel alone or docetaxel plus hyperthemia showed the greatest delays in tumor growth time in the experiments.

Animals↗

Effect of docetaxel on the therapeutic ratio of fractionated radiotherapy in vivo.

The aim of this investigation was to determine whether docetaxel increases the therapeutic ratio of fractionated radiotherapy in vivo. Two tumor types were chosen based on their sensitivity to docetaxel as a single agent: (a) docetaxel-sensitive MCa-4 mammary adenocarcinoma, which responds to docetaxel by G2-M-phase cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and subsequent reoxygenation of surviving tumor cells; and (b) docetaxel-resistant SCC-VII squamous cell carcinoma, which responds to docetaxel treatment only by G2-M-phase arrest. Response of the normal jejunal mucosa in mice was compared to the response of both tumor types to confirm therapeutic gain. We conducted micromorphometric analysis of tumor cell mitosis, assayed apoptosis by its histological appearance in tissue sections, and determined tumor response by tumor growth delay. Normal tissue response of the jejunum was assayed by micromorphometric analysis of mitotic and apoptotic indices, and clonal crypt stem cell survival was measured using the microcolony assay. Two clinically relevant treatment schedules were tested for both antitumor efficacy and normal tissue toxicity: (a) a single bolus of docetaxel (33 mg/kg i.v.) 24 h before five daily fractions of radiation; and (b) daily administration of docetaxel (8 mg/kg i.v.) with radiation delivered at the peak of mitotic arrest (9 h for MCa-4 and 6 h for SCC-VII tumors). The best therapeutic gain for docetaxel-sensitive MCa-4 was achieved with a single bolus of drug 24 h before the start of fractionated radiotherapy (therapeutic gain = 2.04). This schedule takes advantage of reoxygenation of hypoxic tumor cells during the interval between drug treatment and radiation delivery. The best therapeutic gain for docetaxel-resistant SCC-VII was achieved with intermittent multiple doses of docetaxel given during the course of fractionated radiotherapy. This schedule maximized the exposure of cells to radiation while they were arrested by docetaxel in the radiosensitive G2-M phases of the cell cycle (enhancement factor = 2.0). Final therapeutic gain was reduced to 1.59 because of increased normal tissue toxicity in mice treated with multiple intermittent doses of docetaxel in combination with fractionated radiotherapy. Thus, docetaxel greatly enhanced tumor response to fractionated radiotherapy, but the magnitude of therapeutic efficacy depended on drug-radiation scheduling. The greatest therapeutic gain in the treatment of docetaxel-sensitive tumors was achieved by a single large dose of docetaxel administered 1 day before the initiation of fractionated radiotherapy and in the treatment of docetaxel-resistant tumors by daily concomitant docetaxel-radiation treatments.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Oral bioavailability of docetaxel in combination with OC144-093 (ONT-093).

OBJECTIVE: Docetaxel given orally as monotherapy results in low bioavailability of <10%. Previous studies have indicated that the intestinal efflux pump P-glycoprotein (P-gp) prevents uptake from the gut resulting in low systemic exposure to docetaxel. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of enhancement of the oral uptake of docetaxel on combination with orally administered OC144-093, a potent P-gp inhibitor. Furthermore, the safety of combined treatment was determined and whether known functional genetic polymorphisms of the MDR1 gene could be associated with variability in docetaxel pharmacokinetics was also investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A proof of concept study was carried out in 12 patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients were randomized to receive one course of 100 mg oral docetaxel combined with 500 mg OC144-093 followed 2 weeks later by a second i.v. course of docetaxel at a flat dose of 100 mg, without OC144-093, or vice versa. This was followed by standard i.v. docetaxel treatment if indicated. RESULTS: The apparent relative oral bioavailability of docetaxel was 26+/-8%. Orally administered docetaxel combined with oral OC144-093 resulted in a Cmax of 415+/-255 ng ml(-1), an AUC0-infinity of 844+/-753 ng h ml(-1) and kel of 0.810+/-0.296 h(-1). These values differed significantly from those following i.v. administration of docetaxel, with a Cmax of 2124+/-1054 ng ml(-1), an AUC0-infinity of 2571+/-1598 ng h ml(-1) and a kel of 1.318+/-0.785 h(-1) (P=0.003, P=0.006, P=0.016). The study medication was well tolerated and most of the adverse events possibly or probably related to OC144-093 and docetaxel were of CTC grade 1 and 2. One patient had a homozygous 3435T/T mutation, which is associated with low intestinal P-gp expression, and two other patients had a homozygous mutation on exon 21. CONCLUSION: The relative apparent bioavailability of 26% was most likely caused by a significant effect of OC144-093 on the oral uptake of docetaxel. Large intrapatient and interpatient (pharmacokinetic) variation was found after oral as well as after i.v. administration of docetaxel. Higher plasma levels were observed after 100 mg i.v. docetaxel than after 100 mg oral docetaxel plus 500 mg oral OC144-093. The safety of the oral combination was good. More patients should be evaluated to determine the effect of P-gp single nucleotide polymorphisms on oral pharmacokinetic values of docetaxel.

Administration, Oral↗

Enhancement of tumor radioresponse by docetaxel: Involvement of immune system.

Docetaxel, a potent chemotherapeutic drug and a strong enhancer of tumor radioresponse, possesses immunomodulating properties. We previously reported that 40% of murine tumors responding to docetaxel by growth delay showed heavy infiltration with macrophages or lymphocytes. The present study explored the effect of whole body irradiation on antitumor action of docetaxel alone or docetaxel plus tumor irradiation. Mice bearing 8-mm MCa-K mammary carcinoma in the leg received 33 mg/kg docetaxel i.v., 5 to 65 Gy tumor irradiation, or both (radiation given 24 h after docetaxel). Docetaxel delayed tumor growth and enhanced the efficacy of radiation: it dramatically reduced TCD50 (radiation dose yielding 50% tumor cure) from the control value of 38.6 Gy to 11.8 Gy, for an enhancement factor of 3.27. In addition to enhancing tumor radioresponse, docetaxel decreased the lung metastatic rate in mice with local tumor control from 26% in mice receiving radiation alone to 11% in mice receiving docetaxel plus radiation. Docetaxel induced heavy infiltration of tumors with lymphocytes, determined 2-4 days after treatment: the percentage of lymphocytes increased from the control value of <2% to 27% in mice that received docetaxel 3 days earlier. This increase was due to the influx of helper/inducer T-lymphocytes and natural killer cells. Immunosuppression of tumor-bearing mice with 6 Gy whole-body irradiation prior to tumor isotransplantation reduced docetaxel-induced lymphocyte infiltration of tumors, antitumor and anti-metastatic action of docetaxel, and docetaxel-induced enhancement of tumor radioresponse. Thus, our results showed that docetaxel stimulates tumor infiltration with immune cells, which then participate in antitumor action of docetaxel alone or when combined with radiotherapy.

Animals↗

Docetaxel chronopharmacology in mice.

Docetaxel tolerance and antitumor efficacy could be enhanced if drug administration was adapted to circadian rhythms. This hypothesis was investigated in seven experiments involving a total of 626 male B6D2F1 mice, synchronized with an alternation of 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness (12:12), after i.v. administration of docetaxel. In experiment (Exp) 1, the drug was given once a week (wk) for 6 wks (20 mg/kg/wk) or for 5 wks (30 mg/kg/wk) at one of six circadian times, during light when mice were resting [3, 7, or 11 hours after light onset (HALO)], or during darkness, when mice were active (15, 19, or 23 HALO). Endpoints were survival and body weight change. In Exp 2 and 3, docetaxel (30 mg/kg/wk) was administered twice, 1 wk apart, at one of four circadian stages (7, 11, 19, or 23 HALO). Endpoints were hematological and intestinal toxicities. In Exp 4, circadian changes in cell cycle phase distribution and BCL-2 immunofluorescence were investigated in bone marrow as possible mechanisms of docetaxel tolerability rhythm. In Exp 5 to 7, docetaxel was administered to mice bearing measurable P03 pancreatic adenocarcinoma (270-370 mg), with tumor weight and survival as endpoints. Mice from Exp 5 and 6 received a weekly schedule of docetaxel at one of six circadian stages (20 or 30 mg/kg/wk at 3, 7, 11, 15, 19, or 23 HALO). In Exp 7, docetaxel (30 mg/kg) was given every 2 days (day 1, 3, 5 schedule) at 7, 11, 19, or 23 HALO. Docetaxel dosing in the second half of darkness (19 or 23 HALO) resulted in significantly worse toxicity than its administration during the light span (3, 7, or 11 HALO). The survival rate ranged from 56.3% in the mice treated at 23 HALO to 93.8 or 87.5% in those injected at 3 or 11 HALO, respectively (Exp 1, P < 0.01). Granulocytopenia at nadir was -49 +/- 14% at 7 HALO compared with -84 +/- 3% at 19 HALO (Exp 2 and 3, P < 0.029), and severe jejunal mucosa necrosis occurred in 5 of 8 mice treated at 23 HALO as opposed to 2 of 18 receiving docetaxel at 7, 11, or 19 HALO (Exp 2 and 3, P < 0.02). The time of least docetaxel toxicity corresponded to the circadian nadir in S or G2-M phase and to the circadian maximum in BCL-2 immunofluorescence in bone marrow. Docetaxel increased the median survival of tumor-bearing mice in a dose-dependent manner (controls: 24 days; 20 mg/kg weekly, 33 days; 30 mg/kg weekly or day 1, 3, 5 schedule, 44 or 46 days, respectively; Exp 5-7). Survival curves of treated mice differed significantly according to dosing time for each dose and schedule (P from log rank <0.003 to P < 0.03). In Exp 5 and 6, the percentage of increase in life span was largest if docetaxel was administered weekly at 7 HALO (20 mg/kg, 220%; 30 mg/kg, 372%) and lowest after docetaxel dosing at 19 HALO (80% with 20 mg/kg) or at 15 HALO (78% with 30 mg/kg). In Exp 7, (day 1, 3, 5 schedule), docetaxel was most active at 11 HALO (percentage increase in life span, 390%) and least active at 23 HALO (210%). Docetaxel tolerability and antitumor efficacy were simultaneously enhanced by drug dosing in the light span, when mice were resting. Mechanisms underlying the tolerability rhythm likely involved the circadian organization of cell cycle regulation. Docetaxel therapeutic index may be improved with an administration at night in cancer patients, when fewest bone marrow cells are in S or G2-M phase.

Animals↗

Docetaxel: a review of its use in non-small cell lung cancer.

Docetaxel, a semisynthetic member of the taxoid class of antineoplastic agents, is effective in the treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In noncomparative trials in patients with NSCLC, docetaxel 75 or 100 mg/m2 produced objective response rates of 20 to 38% and 14 to 25% as a first-line or second-line monotherapy, respectively. In Japan, docetaxel 60 mg/m2 produced objective response rates of 19 to 25% in previously untreated patients. Docetaxel 100 or 75 mg/m2 produced significantly higher response rates than either vinorelbine or ifosfamide in previously treated patients; patients treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 had an improved 1-year survival rate compared with those who received vinorelbine or ifosfamide. Docetaxel monotherapy in chemotherapy-naive patients produced survival rates that are similar to those reported for most platinum-containing standard combinations such as cisplatin plus vinorelbine. Combination of docetaxel with one other antineoplastic resulted in objective response rates of 20 to 54% in chemotherapy-naive patients; triple chemotherapy combinations produced responses in 51 and 60% of patients. Promising results from a few small studies and one large phase II study have also indicated a potential role for docetaxel as neoadjuvant therapy. The main dose-limiting adverse event associated with docetaxel is neutropenia, and fluid retention is common in many patients. The tolerability profile is generally acceptable in the majority of patients, although extra care has to be taken in patients with impaired liver function to minimise the risk of severe or febrile neutropenia. Conclusions. Docetaxel is generally well tolerated by patients receiving treatment for locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC, and produces response and survival rates equivalent to many current standard treatment options. Comparative studies have shown that docetaxel monotherapy provides significant survival benefits over best supportive care or treatment with vinorelbine or ifosfamide. Response and 1-year survival rates with docetaxel monotherapy are particularly encouraging in patients refractory or resistant to cisplatin or carboplatin, for whom treatment options are few. Neoadjuvant docetaxel has produced improved survival compared with local treatment alone. Combinations of docetaxel with other antineoplastic agents have produced relatively high response and 1-year survival rates; however, further comparative studies are required to confirm these benefits. In the meantime, docetaxel is a welcome addition to the options available for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗