Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Dalteparin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Efficacy and safety of fixed low-dose dalteparin in preventing venous thromboembolism among obese or elderly hospitalized patients: a subgroup analysis of the PREVENT trial.

BACKGROUND: We were concerned that a fixed rather than a weight-based dosing regimen of dalteparin sodium to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) might result in decreased efficacy in obese patients and decreased safety in elderly patients. METHODS: We retrospectively performed subgroup analyses using the database from the Prospective Evaluation of Dalteparin Efficacy for Prevention of VTE in Immobilized Patients (PREVENT) Trial, a study of 3706 hospitalized, medically ill patients randomized to receive either dalteparin sodium, 5000 U/d, or placebo. The primary end point was a composite of symptomatic VTE, fatal pulmonary embolism, sudden death, or asymptomatic proximal deep venous thrombosis by day 21. Obesity was defined as a body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) of 30 or greater for men and 28.6 or greater for women. RESULTS: Overall, 1118 patients (30.4%) were obese and 1226 (33.3%) were 75 years or older. In obese patients, the primary end point occurred in 2.8% of the dalteparin and in 4.3% of the placebo groups (relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-1.28). In patients 75 years or older, the primary end point was reported in 4.2% of the dalteparin and in 8.0% of the placebo groups (relative risk, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.87). The dalteparin effect for the primary end point (odds ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.82) was not attenuated when adjusted for age, sex, obesity, history of VTE, and varicose veins. Dalteparin was not associated with an increase in major hemorrhage by day 21 in obese (0% vs 0.7% placebo; P>.99) and in elderly (1.1% vs 0.7%; P=.12) patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a fixed low dose of dalteparin sodium of 5000 U/d is effective and safe in preventing VTE in obese and elderly hospitalized medical patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Benefits of extended treatment with dalteparin in patients with unstable coronary artery disease eligible for revascularization.

AIMS: The FRISC II trial demonstrated that, for patients with unstable coronary artery disease, an early invasive strategy following acute treatment with dalteparin and aspirin, was superior to a more conservative approach. We evaluated whether it is beneficial to extend treatment with dalteparin to patients eligible for revascularization but for whom these procedures are performed after the initial hospital stay. METHODS AND RESULTS: As a subanalysis of FRISC II, the efficacy and clinical safety of extended dalteparin treatment (5000 or 7500 IU.12h(-1) to day 90) compared with placebo was assessed in 1601 patients randomized to a non-invasive group who underwent revascularization only when necessary because of recurring symptoms, (re)infarction, or severe ischaemia. By day 90, 440 patients had undergone revascularization: 267 of these procedures occurred during the double-blind period. All patients initially received acute treatment (5-7 days from day 1) with dalteparin (120 IU/kg(-1) 12h(-1)). The incidence of death and/or myocardial infarction was monitored until revascularization or day 45 and until revascularization or day 90. There was a significant difference in the estimated probability of death and/or myocardial infarction until revascularization or day 90 in favour of dalteparin (log-rank test, P=0.0415) and there was a significant reduction in death and/or myocardial infarction in favour of extended dalteparin treatment at day 45, with a 57% relative risk reduction (P=0.0004). At day 90 the relative risk reduction was 29%. The safety profile of extended dalteparin treatment was similar to that of acute usage. CONCLUSION: Extended dalteparin treatment for up to 45 days is effective and safe as a bridging therapy for patients with unstable coronary artery disease awaiting revascularization.

Coronary Artery Disease↗
PubMed2001

Dalteparin in combination with abciximab during percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Despite proved efficacy for either dalteparin or platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade in improving clinical outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, algorithms guiding concomitant therapy with these agents have not been devised. The purpose of this study was to assess anticoagulant effect and clinical safety for several dose regimens of dalteparin administered in combination with abciximab during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing PCI with standard dose abciximab received dalteparin as follows: 120 IU/kg subcutaneously (SQ) to a maximum of 10,000 U if < or =8 hours before PCI (n = 3); for PCI 8-12 hours after the SQ dose, an additional 40 IU/kg intravenously (IV) was administered (n = 1); for PCI >12 hours after SQ dalteparin or with no prior dalteparin therapy, random allocation to 40 (n = 27) or 60 (n = 28) IU/kg IV during PCI was performed. Those patients who received 60 IU/kg of dalteparin IV had a lower incidence of procedural thrombosis (0% vs 11.1%, P <.01), more consistent antithrombotic effect (anti-factor Xa activity) and a similar incidence of major bleeding (3.7% vs 2.6%) compared with patients who received 40 IU/kg of intravenous dalteparin. CONCLUSIONS: Dalteparin 60 IU/kg IV appears to be safe and effective when administered in conjunction with abciximab for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2003

Comparison of dalteparin and enoxaparin for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in patients with spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: To determine differences between dalteparin and enoxaparin in patients with spinal cord injury. DESIGN: This prospective, randomized, open-label study was performed as a multiple hospital trial in a large urban setting. A total of 100 patients with acute (<3 mo) spinal cord injury were recruited. A total of 95 patients met all inclusion criteria. Fifty received enoxaparin, and 45 received dalteparin. Main outcome measures included deep venous thrombosis, bleeding, compliance, Short Form-12 Health Status Survey, satisfaction, and medication/labor costs. Patients were randomized to receive 30 mg of enoxaparin subcutaneously every 12 hr or 5000 IU of dalteparin subcutaneously once daily. Prophylaxis was continued for 3 mo for motor-complete and 2 mo for motor-incomplete patients. RESULTS: Six percent of the patients developed deep venous thrombosis while receiving enoxaparin and 4% while receiving dalteparin (chi2 = 0.44, df = 1, P = 0.51). Four percent developed bleeding while receiving dalteparin and 2% while receiving enoxaparin (chi2 = 0.13, df = 1, P = 0.72). No differences were noted in compliance, health status, or most of the satisfaction measures. It was, however, noted that after being discharged home, the patients receiving enoxaparin rated the shots significantly more inconvenient (two injections per day) compared with taking three pills per day, than those receiving dalteparin (one injection per day, P < 0.05). The cost of the medication was 1101 US dollars/mo for enoxaparin (two injections per day) and 750 US dollars/mo for dalteparin (one injection per day). CONCLUSION: Similar compliance, health status, deep venous thrombosis, and bleeding rates were found between dalteparin and enoxaparin.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Influence of prolonged dalteparin treatment on coagulation, fibrinolysis and inflammation in unstable coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Unstable coronary artery disease (CAD) is a multi-factorial disease involving thrombotic and inflammatory processes. Short-term low molecular weight (LMW) heparin treatment reduces coagulation activity and clinical events. We investigated the influence of prolonged treatment on coagulation, fibrinolysis and inflammation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Serial blood samples were obtained from 555 of 2,267 unstable CAD patients in the FRISC II study. Patients were treated with the LMW heparin dalteparin 120 IU kg(-1) s.c. twice daily for 5-7 days and randomized to placebo (n=285) or gender and weight-adjusted doses of dalteparin (5,000 or 7,500 IU) twice daily (n=270) for 3 months. Dalteparin persistently depressed coagulation activity with, when compared with placebo, lower median levels of factor VIIa (63 IU mL(-1) vs. 84 IU mL(-1)), prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (0.86 nmol L(-1) vs. 1.09 nmol L(-1)) and D-dimer (21 microg L(-1) vs. 43 microug L(-1)) after 3 months, all P<0.01. Reactivation of coagulation activity was observed after cessation of both short-term and prolonged dalteparin treatment. Higher levels of tPA/PAI-1 complex (11.7 microg L(-1) vs. 6.5 microg L(-1), P<0.001) and von Willebrand factor (162% vs. 136%, P<0.001) were found during prolonged dalteparin treatment. Interleukin-6, C-reactive protein and fibrinogen levels were unaffected by dalteparin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Three months dalteparin treatment resulted in a sustained and pronounced reduction of coagulation activity, which corresponds to the observed reduction in death and myocardial infarction during the initial 6 weeks in the FRISC II study. The persistently elevated levels of tPA/PAI-1 complex and von Willebrand factor might reflect effects on platelets and endothelial cells and thus contribute to the gradually decreased efficacy by prolonged dalteparin treatment in unstable CAD.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Cost effectiveness of extended treatment with low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin) in unstable coronary artery disease: results from the FRISC II trial.

BACKGROUND: In unstable coronary artery disease short term treatment with low molecular weight heparin in addition to aspirin has been shown to be effective. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost effectiveness of extended treatment with dalteparin in patients managed with a non-invasive treatment strategy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, multicentre study. SETTING: 58 centres in Sweden, Denmark, and Norway, of which 16 were interventional. PATIENTS: After at least five days' treatment with open label dalteparin, 2267 patients were randomised to continue double blind treatment with either subcutaneous dalteparin twice daily or placebo for three months. The patients' use of health service resources was recorded prospectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Death/myocardial infarction. RESULTS: After one month into the double blind period there was a 47% relative reduction in death or myocardial infarction in the dalteparin group compared with the placebo group (p = 0.002). There was a non-significant mean cost difference, favouring the placebo group, of 849 Swedish crowns (SEK) per patient (equivalent to 58 pounds sterling). The incremental cost effectiveness ratio for giving dalteparin treatment for one month was SEK 30 300 (range -78 000 to 139 000) (2060 pounds sterling, range -5300 pounds sterling to pound 9400 pounds sterling) per avoided death or myocardial infarct. At three months, the decrease in death or myocardial infarction was not significant, precluding cost effectiveness analyses. CONCLUSIONS: There is a marginal and non-significant increase in costs for one month of extended dalteparin treatment compared with placebo. Extended dalteparin treatment lowers the risk of death or myocardial infarction in patients with unstable coronary artery disease. While in many countries the resources for early intervention are limited, extended dalteparin treatment up to one month is a cost effective bridge to invasive intervention.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty. Comparison of warfarin and dalteparin.

The effectiveness and safety of warfarin were compared with those of a low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) for the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty in a prospective, randomized, multi-institutional trial. Patients who were older than eighteen years of age and were scheduled to have an elective primary or revision total hip arthroplasty were eligible; 580 patients were randomized, 550 had the operation and received prophylaxis, and 382 had evaluable venograms. Prophylaxis was provided either with warfarin beginning the night before the operation or with dalteparin beginning two hours before the operation and was continued until venography was performed. Bleeding was assessed on the basis of intraoperative blood loss, transfusion requirements, a decrease in hematocrit, and clinically identified bleeding complications. The prevalence of deep-vein thrombosis was found to be significantly lower in the patients who had received dalteparin than in those who had received warfarin (twenty-eight [15 per cent] of 192 patients compared with forty-nine [26 per cent] of 190 patients; p = 0.006). Deep-vein thrombosis occurred in the calf veins of twenty-one patients (11 per cent) who had received dalteparin and of forty-three patients (23 per cent) who had received warfarin; this difference was significant (p = 0.003). Proximal deep-vein thrombosis occurred in ten patients (5 per cent) who had received dalteparin and in sixteen patients (8 per cent) who had received warfarin; however, with the numbers available, no significant difference could be detected (p = 0.185). We also could not detect a significant difference with regard to the intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, the decrease in hematocrit, and the prevalence of major bleeding complications between the two groups; however, the patients who had received dalteparin had a significantly higher prevalence of bleeding complications involving the operative site (p = 0.03), and a significantly greater percentage required postoperative transfusions (p = 0.001). We concluded that preoperative prophylaxis with dalteparin is significantly more effective than that with warfarin in preventing deep-vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty. The greater effectiveness of dalteparin must be considered, however, in light of an increased need for postoperative transfusions and an increase in the prevalence of wound-related bleeding complications.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2003

Effect of dalteparin on healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetic patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic foot ulcers are a common, severe, and expensive complication threatening life and limb in patients with diabetes. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of dalteparin on ulcer outcome in patients with diabetes, peripheral arterial occlusive disease, and chronic foot ulcers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 87 patients were investigated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomized to treatment with subcutaneous injection of 5000 units dalteparin (Fragmin, Pharmacia Corporation; n = 44) or an equivalent volume of physiological saline (n = 43) once daily until ulcer healing or for a maximum of 6 months. Ulcer outcome was investigated by evaluating the number of patients 1). who healed with intact skin; 2). in whom the study ulcer was improved, unchanged, or impaired; or 3). who were amputated above or below the ankle level, as compared with control subjects. RESULTS: Two patients, one on dalteparin and one on placebo, dropped out of the study. Ulcer outcome was significantly better (P = 0.042, two-sided chi(2) test for trend) in the dalteparin group (n = 43) compared with the placebo group (n = 42). A total of 29 patients healed with intact skin (n = 14) or decreased the ulcer area >or=50% (n = 15) in the dalteparin group compared with 20 (n = 9 and 11, respectively) in the placebo group. Five patients in each group showed impaired ulcer healing, i.e., the ulcer area increased >or=50%. Two patients in the dalteparin group were amputated compared with eight in the placebo group. Time to healing with intact skin was 17 +/- 8 weeks in the dalteparin group compared with 16 +/- 7 weeks in placebo group (NS). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that dalteparin improves the outcome of chronic foot ulcers in diabetic patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

Age of Onset↗
PubMed2001

The low-molecular-weight heparin dalteparin as adjuvant therapy in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT PLUS study.

Rapid reperfusion of an infarct-related artery reduces the extent of myocardial damage and improves survival in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Currently, anticoagulant treatment with unfractionated heparin (UFH) is used as adjuvant therapy to fibrinolytic treatment. The low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) dalteparin is at least as effective as UFH in unstable coronary artery disease. The ASSENT PLUS trial was carried out to evaluate whether dalteparin is as effective as UFH as an adjunct to recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and aspirin in obtaining patency and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI)-3 flow in patients with AMI. The primary assessment of this phase II trial was TIMI flow, determined by coronary angiography. Patients with ST-elevation MI were randomized to receive aspirin and either rt-PA and UFH for 48 h, or rt-PA and dalteparin for 4 to 7 days. Evaluation was by TIMI flow after 4 to 7 days and clinical events (death, reinfarction, or revascularization) up to 30 days. There was a clear trend toward greater TIMI 3 flow with dalteparin compared with UFH. There was significantly less TIMI 0-1 flow or thrombus in the dalteparin group. Bleeding rates were similar. The occurrence of reinfarction was reduced during dalteparin treatment. These findings suggest that dalteparin could be substituted for UFH as an adjunct to rt-PA/aspirin in the management of patients with AMI.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2004

Cost-minimization analysis of low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) compared to unfractionated heparin for inpatient treatment of cancer patients with deep venous thrombosis.

GOALS: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has shown to be as effective as unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Although the acquisition cost of LMWH is significantly greater than that of UFH, we hypothesized that once-daily dalteparin, a LMWH, could reduce treatment costs of cancer patients with DVT by eliminating anticoagulation monitoring and shortening hospitalization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We developed a cost-minimization model by using outcomes and resource utilization data from two retrospective matched cohorts of cancer patients who, between 1994 and 1999, were hospitalized at our comprehensive cancer center for treatment of DVT with either LMWH ( n=21) or UFH ( n=168). We assumed all LMWHs and UFH to be equally effective. The total costs for the dalteparin strategy and the UFH strategy were calculated in year 2003 U.S. dollars, from the provider's perspective, by multiplying the number of resources used for inpatient treatment of DVT by their unit costs. RESULTS: The mean total cost for inpatient care was $3,383 US dollars (95% CI= $2,683- $4,083) for dalteparin and $4,952 US dollars (95% CI=$4,718-$5,185) for UFH. Substantial savings resulted from shorter hospitalization among the dalteparin-treated patients (mean 3.19 versus 5.22 days). Sensitivity analysis did not change the conclusion that dalteparin is less expensive than UFH. CONCLUSIONS: Savings realized from less anticoagulant monitoring and shorter hospitalization offset the higher acquisition cost of dalteparin. The dalteparin strategy is less expensive than the UFH strategy for the inpatient treatment of DVT among cancer patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Dalteparin thromboprophylaxis for critically ill medical-surgical patients with renal insufficiency.

PURPOSE: Thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) may be more effective than unfractionated heparin but also more likely to bioaccumulate and potentially cause bleeding in patients with renal insufficiency. The objectives of this study were to assess, among medical-surgical patients in the intensive care unit receiving dalteparin 5,000 IU daily for thromboprophylaxis, (1) the relationship between renal dysfunction and LMWH bioaccumulation as measured by trough anti-Xa levels, (2) the relationship between renal dysfunction and risk of bleeding as measured by a surrogate marker (peak anti-Xa levels), and (3) the relationship between anti-Xa levels, bleeding events, and thrombotic events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective single-center cohort study, we enrolled patients 18 years or older, expected to stay 72 hours or longer, and with a creatinine clearance 30 mL/min or higher at intensive care unit admission. We administered 5,000 IU dalteparin subcutaneously each day. The main phase 1 objective was to detect bioaccumulation of dalteparin by measuring trough anti-Xa levels (22-23 hours post dalteparin). The main phase 2 objective was to examine the relationship between renal dysfunction and peak anti-Xa levels (4 hours post dalteparin). We recorded creatinine clearance daily and bleeding and thrombotic events, blinded to anti-Xa levels. RESULTS: We enrolled 19 patients aged 62.7 (13.2) years with an APACHE II score of 23.5 (9.4). We measured trough anti-Xa levels on 185 occasions in 19 patients; we measured peak anti-Xa levels on 113 occasions in 11 patients. We identified no bioaccumulation of LMWH in this study, as detected by trough anti-Xa levels. Most peak anti-Xa levels were in the conventional prophylactic range. CONCLUSIONS: When administered in prophylactic doses to critically ill patients with a wide range of calculated creatinine clearances, we found no evidence of bioaccumulation of dalteparin. If dalteparin does not bioaccumulate, it may be an attractive alternative agent for thromboprophylaxis.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2000

Prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic diseases during pregnancy with dalteparin.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if a prophylactic dose of dalteparin, 5000 IU daily, and if the adjusted-weight dalteparin therapeutic dose of 100 IU/kg twice daily are appropriate in pregnancy. METHOD: Anti-Xa activity levels were used to assess prophylactic (33 women) and therapeutic (15 women) dalteparin dosage throughout pregnancy. Analysis of variance was used and P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In the prophylactic group, anti-Xa activity levels did not vary significantly throughout pregnancy (P=0.15). The initial dalteparin dose was modified on the first anti-Xa activity measurement in eight women, whose weight was statistically different from those remaining on the initial dose (P<0.001). The adjusted-weight therapeutic dalteparin dose induced adequate anti-Xa activity levels. CONCLUSIONS: Dalteparin, 5000 IU daily, is suitable for most pregnant women and does not need to be modified in the third trimester. A therapeutic dalteparin dose adjusted according to pregnancy weight is appropriate.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Randomized, pilot study of intermittent pneumatic compression devices plus dalteparin versus intermittent pneumatic compression devices plus heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing craniotomy.

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin and the low molecular weight heparin, dalteparin, are used for prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing craniotomy. These drugs were compared in a randomized, prospective pilot study comparing intermittent pneumatic compression devices plus dalteparin to intermittent pneumatic compression devices plus heparin. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing craniotomy were randomly allocated to receive perioperative prophylaxis with subcutaneous (SC heparin, 5000 units every 12 hours, or dalteparin, 2,500 units once a day, begun at induction of anesthesia and continued for 7 days or until the patient was ambulating. Entry criteria were age over 18 years, no deep vein thrombosis (DVT) preoperatively as judged by lower limb duplex ultrasound and no clinical evidence of pulmonary embolism preoperatively. Patients with hypersensitivity to heparin, penetrating head injury or who refused informed consent were excluded. Patients underwent a duplex study 1 week after surgery and 1 month clinical follow-up. All patients were treated with lower limb intermittent pneumatic compression devices. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in age, gender, and risk factors for venous thromboembolism. There were no differences between groups in intraoperative blood loss, transfusion requirements or postoperative platelet counts. Two patients receiving dalteparin developed DVT (one symptomatic and one asymptomatic). No patient treated with heparin developed DVT and no patient in either group developed pulmonary embolism. There were two hemorrhages that did not require repeat craniotomy in patients receiving dalteparin and one that did require surgical evacuation in a patient treated with heparin. Drug was stopped in two patients treated with dalteparin because of thrombocytopenia. None of these differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in postoperative hemorrhage, venous thromboembolism or thrombocytopenia between heparin and dalteparin. The results suggest that, given the small sample size of this trial, both drugs appear to be safe and the incidence of venous thromboembolism by postoperative screening duplex ultrasound appears to be low when these agents are used in combination with intermittent pneumatic compression devices.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Assessment of the stability of dalteparin sodium in prepared syringes for up to thirty days: an in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: If a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) injectable formulation maintains its stability for up to 30 days, substantial cost reductions in hospital stay could be achieved with its use on an outpatient basis in patients who might otherwise be treated with IV heparin as inpatients. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess the stability for up to 30 days of injectable solutions of the LMWH dalteparin sodium when repackaged in plastic syringes. METHODS: In the first part of the study, 1-mL and 3-mL plastic syringes were filled with the contents of a 10,000-IU/mL dalteparin ampule or a 25,000-IU/mL dalteparin multidose vial. In a separate part of the study, 1-mL and 3-mL syringes were filled with doses of 7500 IU and 10,000 IU, respectively, from a 10,000-IU/mL multidose vial. After the syringes were brought to room temperature or 4 degrees C, the stability of dalteparin was assessed over 30 days by measuring anti-factor Xa levels. RESULTS: No significant loss of dalteparin activity was found for up to 30 days in the syringes after storage at room temperature or 4 degrees C. The solutions retained anti-factor Xa activity at room temperature and under refrigeration. CONCLUSION: Dalteparin is stable for up to 30 days when stored at room temperature or 4 degrees C. The findings suggest that preparation of a postdischarge supply of dalteparin is feasible, contributing to more convenient and effective management of outpatients at risk for thrombotic complications.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2003

Low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin) compared to unfractionated heparin as an adjunct to rt-PA (alteplase) for improvement of coronary artery patency in acute myocardial infarction-the ASSENT Plus study.

BACKGROUND: Current thrombolytic-antithrombotic regimens in acute myocardialinfarction (AMI) are limited by incomplete early coronary reperfusion and by reocclusion and reinfarction. We compared the effects of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) as an adjunct to recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator (alteplase) on coronary artery patency and clinical outcomes in AMI. METHODS: Patients with AMI treated with alteplase (n=439) were randomised to either subcutaneous dalteparin (120 IU/kg every 12h) for 4-7 days or intravenous infusion of UFH for 48 h. Coronary angiography was performed between day 4 and hospital discharge. Clinical events and safety were evaluated until day 30. RESULTS: Overall there were higher thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flows in the infarct related coronary artery in the dalteparin group (p=0.016). The predefined primary end-point, TIMI grade 3 flow, did not reach statistical significance (dalteparin 69.3% versus heparin 62.5%; p=0.163). However, TIMI 0-1 flow (13.4 versus 24.4%; p=0.006) and its combination with intraluminal thrombus (27.9 versus 42.0%; p=0.003) were less common in the dalteparin group. During the period of randomised treatment there were less myocardial reinfarctions in the dalteparin group(p=0.010) but after cessation of dalteparin there were more reinfarctions resulting in no difference in death or MI at 30 days. There were no significant differences in major bleeding or stroke after 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: In alteplase treated AMI adjunctive dalteparin for 4-7 days seems to reduce the risk of early coronary artery occlusion and reinfarction. However, early after cessation of treatment there is a raised risk of events, which might eliminate any long-term gains.

Abciximab↗
PubMed1996

A multicentre comparison of once-daily subcutaneous dalteparin (low molecular weight heparin) and continuous intravenous heparin in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of the low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) dalteparin with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the acute treatment of DVT patients who had not previously received UFH. DESIGN: An open randomized multicentre trial with blinded analysis of venograms. SETTING: Seven hospitals in Sweden, Finland and the USA. SUBJECTS: A total of 330 patients, of 20 years or older, with suspected DVT, verified using venography. INTERVENTIONS: Fixed-dose dalteparin (200 IU kg-1) given as a once-daily subcutaneous injection, or aPTT adjusted i.v. UFH infusion for 6 to 10 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in Marder score in patients with confirmed DVT and two evaluable venograms; PE, bleeding events and follow-up. RESULTS: Marder scores improved in 51% (95% CI 42-60%) of 92 patients treated with dalteparin and in 62% (95% CI 53-70%) of 98 patients treated with UFH (P = 0.152). One dalteparin-treated patient had a PE confirmed by V/Q scan; another had progressive thrombosis with swelling in the affected limb. Bleeding complications occurred in six patients in each group. One patient treated with dalteparin and five treated with UFH died during the 6-month follow-up period as a result of underlying malignancy or heart disease. The 6-month recurrence rate was low with both treatments (dalteparin, 3/97; UFH, 2/103). CONCLUSIONS: Fixed-dose subcutaneous dalteparin given once daily from the start of treatment is of equivalent efficacy and safety to conventional UFH therapy in the routine management of DVT.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Pharmacokinetic studies of dalteparin (Fragmin), enoxaparin (Clexane), and danaparoid sodium (Orgaran) in stable chronic hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and danaparoid are an alternative to unfractionated heparin (UH) for anticoagulation during hemodialysis. Few data are available concerning their duration of action and whether drug accumulation occurs with continued use. We performed a prospective randomized study of the pharmacokinetics of dalteparin and enoxaparin plus danaparoid in 21 hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to administration of enoxaparin, 40 mg; dalteparin, 2,500 U; or danaparoid, 34 U/kg, for 4 weeks. Antifactor Xa levels were measured at the end of weeks 1 and 4 immediately before the injection and at prescribed intervals up to 48 hours postinjection. RESULTS: No bleeding or thrombotic episodes occurred during the study. Mean antifactor Xa activities 4 hours postinjection were 0.2 +/- 0.035 (SEM), 0.38 +/- 0.028, and 0.54 +/- 0.051 U/mL week 1 and 0.26 +/- 0.038, 0.40 +/- 0.055, and 0.64 +/- 0.050 U/mL week 4 for dalteparin, enoxaparin, and danaparoid, respectively. Both weeks 1 and 4, antifactor Xa activity 3 hours postdose was significantly greater for danaparoid sodium compared with enoxaparin and dalteparin. There were no significant differences between antifactor Xa activity week 4 versus week 1 for enoxaparin and dalteparin; however, danaparoid sodium levels during dialysis were significantly greater after 4 weeks of treatment (P = 0.0328, 1 hour; P = 0.003, 2 hours; P = 0.0128, 3 and 4 hours). CONCLUSION: Dalteparin and enoxaparin provide adequate anticoagulation for hemodialysis using single bolus injections at relatively low doses. Danaparoid sodium at the current recommended dosage resulted in greater anticoagulation than enoxaparin or dalteparin and may have an

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2001

Leukocyte-platelet aggregation, platelet surface P-selectin, and platelet surface glycoprotein IIIa after percutaneous coronary intervention: Effects of dalteparin or unfractionated heparin in combination with abciximab.

BACKGROUND: Plaque disruption with resultant platelet activation and leukocyte-platelet aggregation is a pathophysiologic process common to both acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary interventions. Unfractionated heparin is a standard antithrombotic therapy in patients with both acute coronary syndromes and in those undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Low-molecular-weight heparins have been reported to cause less platelet activation than unfractionated heparin. METHODS: Monocyte-platelet aggregates, neutrophil-platelet aggregates, platelet surface P-selectin, and platelet surface glycoprotein (GP) IIIa were measured serially by whole blood flow cytometry in 40 patients with unstable angina (randomly assigned to either unfractionated heparin 70 U/kg or the low-molecular-weight heparin dalteparin 60 IU/kg) undergoing coronary intervention with planned abciximab administration (in 2, one-half-dose boluses). Assays were performed at baseline, 5 minutes after administration of either type of heparin, 10 minutes after the first bolus of abciximab, 10 minutes after second bolus of abciximab, and 8 to 10 and 16 to 24 hours after administration of either heparin. RESULTS: No significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed between patients receiving either unfractionated heparin or dalteparin. The number of circulating P-selectin-positive platelets was increased by unfractionated heparin but not dalteparin, and abciximab reversed this increase. The number of circulating P-selectin-positive platelets was reduced below baseline levels in both treatment groups 8 to 10 and 16 to 24 hours after study drug administration. At 8 to 10 and 16 to 24 hours after administration of study drug, platelet degranulation in response to iso-thrombin receptor agonist peptide 1.5 mmol/L was significantly reduced by almost 50% (compared with immediately after study drug administration). Both unfractionated heparin and dalteparin significantly increased the numbers of circulating monocyte-platelet and neutrophil-platelet aggregates, which were subsequently reduced to baseline levels after administration of the second abciximab bolus and to below baseline at both 8 to 10 and 16 to 24 hours in all patients. After both unfractionated heparin and dalteparin administration, platelet surface GP IIIa expression was significantly increased compared with baseline at both 8 to 10 and 16 to 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Dalteparin in combination with abciximab in patients with unstable angina undergoing coronary intervention appears to be safe. Unfractionated heparin, but not dalteparin, degranulates platelets in patients with unstable angina. Both heparins increase the number of circulating monocyte-platelet and neutrophil-platelet aggregates. Abciximab therapy during coronary interventions rapidly reduces the number of degranulated platelets and leukocyte-platelet aggregates.

Abciximab↗