Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DEXAMETHASONE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Dexamethasone and dexamethasone phosphate detected by 1H and 19F NMR spectroscopy in the aqueous humour.

To apply nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to study the penetration of dexamethasone phosphate into the aqueous humour from rabbit following topical administration. After topical administration of 0.1%, 1.0% and 10% dexamethasone phosphate solutions, respectively, samples of aqueous humour were aspirated, freeze-dried, redissolved in deuterium oxide and analyzed by high resolution 1H and 19F NMR spectroscopy. In order to study the lipophilic and hydrophilic metabolites of the drug, samples obtained after application of 1% dexamethasone phosphate were extracted with methanol/chloroform, and then extracted with perchloric acid. In all samples obtained from eyes denuded of the corneal epithelium prior to administration of dexamethasone, signals corresponding to the chemical shifts of the drug were identified in 19F NMR spectra. In the experiments performed with 1% dexamethasone phosphate, both dexamethasone and dexamethasone phosphate were detected in the aqueous humour. Using 10% dexamethasone phosphate solutions, signals from the drug were detected in 1H NMR spectra simultaneously with signals from about twenty other substances present in the aqueous humour. NMR spectroscopy appears to be a valuable method for studying dexamethasone metabolism and penetration into ocular tissues. It provides simultaneous detection of both the drug metabolites and other substances in the sample and might offer a complementary approach to other analytical methods.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1987

The dexamethasone suppression test: importance of dexamethasone concentrations.

Plasma dexamethasone concentrations and cortisol response to dexamethasone were measured in 29 normal healthy volunteers, 23 depressed patients, and 10 patients with anorexia nervosa at 4:00 PM postdexamethasone. In each of the 3 groups, nonsuppressors had lower dexamethasone concentrations than suppressors. Of the subjects with plasma dexamethasone at or below 0.7 ng/ml, a significantly higher proportion (48%) were nonsuppressors compared to the proportion above 0.7 ng/ml (14%), all of whom were patients. Plasma dexamethasone concentrations in a subgroup of depressed nonsuppressors were high (mean 1.35 ng/ml), whereas the remainder were low (0.42 ng/ml) and were similar to the normal nonsuppressors (0.35 ng/ml), suggesting different mechanisms for nonsuppression in the subgroups. Plasma dexamethasone concentrations were similar in nonendogenous and endogenous depressives, in men and women, and in medicated and drug-free patients. None of the variables of age, weight, history of weight loss, Hamilton depression rating score, predexamethasone cortisol, or postdexamethasone cortisol were significantly correlated with plasma dexamethasone, except for body weight and a history of weight loss in the depressed group only. Mean plasma dexamethasone concentrations increased significantly from week 1 to week 2 in 7 depressed patients, whereas plasma cortisol decreased; however, the relationship between dexamethasone and cortisol varied considerably for individual patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Plasma dexamethasone levels in children given the dexamethasone suppression test.

To determine whether children who demonstrate dexamethasone suppression test (DST) nonsuppression have lower plasma dexamethasone levels than DST suppressors, we administered the DST to 73 patients ranging in age from 5-14 years. Plasma dexamethasone levels and postdexamethasone cortisol levels were measured at 4:00 PM on day 2. We found: (1) DST nonsuppressors had significantly lower plasma dexamethasone levels (p less than 0.03) than suppressors; similar trends were observed when the population was divided into depressed and nondepressed patients; (2) mg/m2 dose of dexamethasone was directly correlated with plasma dexamethasone (p less than 0.003) and inversely correlated with postdexamethasone plasma cortisol levels (p less than 0.04); and (3) a statistically significant inverse correlation between plasma dexamethasone levels and postdexamethasone cortisol levels (p less than 0.04). Our findings show that plasma dexamethasone levels are important in evaluating DST results in psychiatrically disturbed children and suggest that dexamethasone dosage for use in the DST in children might be better calculated in terms of body surface area.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Control of delayed nausea and vomiting with granisetron plus dexamethasone or dexamethasone alone in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacies of granisetron plus dexamethasone and dexamethasone alone in controlling delayed nausea and vomiting after cisplatin chemotherapy (> or = 69 mg/m2) were compared in a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 654 patients (of whom 619 were evaluable) received prophylactic granisetron plus dexamethasone before chemotherapy on day 0; on day 1 complete responders and non-responders were randomized separately to receive dexamethasone, 8 mg b.d. p.o., with either granisetron, 1 mg b.d. p.o., or matching placebo for six days. RESULTS: Over days 1-6 the complete response rates were 54.5% (dexamethasone group) and 52.1% (dexamethasone plus granisetron group). Response rates were higher over days 4-6 (71.8% and 70.7%, respectively) than over days 1-3 (60.4% and 57.9%, respectively). Significantly more patients who responded to antiemetic treatment during day 0 were responders over days 1-6 (63% vs. 17%; P < 0.001). No other treatment-related differences were found. Adverse events tended to be minor, with constipation and headache the most common. Overall, there were no significant differences in the safety profiles of the two regimens, but constipation and abdominal pain were significantly more common in the dexamethasone plus granisetron group. CONCLUSIONS: Granisetron plus dexamethasone did not appear to confer additional benefit over use of dexamethasone alone in controlling delayed nausea and vomiting following cisplatin chemotherapy. Control of acute nausea and vomiting, however, appeared to be an important factor influencing delayed nausea and vomiting.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

A comparison of dexamethasone, ondansetron, and dexamethasone plus ondansetron as prophylactic antiemetic and antipruritic therapy in patients receiving intrathecal morphine for major orthopedic surgery.

UNLABELLED: In a prospective, double-blinded, randomized trial, we evaluated the efficacy of IV (a) dexamethasone 8 mg, (b) ondansetron 8 mg, and (c) dexamethasone 8 mg plus ondansetron 4 mg for the prevention of postoperative nausea, vomiting (PONV), and pruritus in 130 (ASA physical status I to III) patients undergoing elective major orthopedic surgery after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine and intrathecal morphine. After spinal anesthesia, patients were randomized to one of three groups. Failure of PONV prophylaxis in the 24-h postoperative period occurred more frequently in patients who received dexamethasone alone (29 of 40; 73%) compared with those who received either ondansetron alone (23 of 47; 49%) (P = 0.02) or dexamethasone plus ondansetron together (19 of 43; 44%)(P = 0.01). There was no difference in the incidence of failure of prophylaxis of pruritus (70%, 72%, and 70% in dexamethasone 8 mg, ondansetron 8 mg, and dexamethasone 8 mg plus ondansetron 4 mg, respectively) (P > 0.1) in the 24-h postoperative period. We conclude that the administration of dexamethasone 8 mg with ondansetron 4 mg has no added benefit compared with ondansetron 8 mg alone in the prophylaxis of PONV and pruritus. IMPLICATIONS: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pruritus are common side effects after spinal opioid administration. In this study, dexamethasone 8 mg plus ondansetron 4 mg was as effective as ondansetron 8 mg. The administration of dexamethasone alone was associated with a frequent incidence of PONV, demonstrating a lack of efficacy. This has important cost implications.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after thyroidectomy: combined antiemetic treatment with dexamethasone and ginger versus dexamethasone alone.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the prophylactic effects of dexamethasone plus ginger and dexamethasone alone on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing thyroidectomy. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients undergoing general anaesthesia for thyroidectomy were enrolled in this randomised, double-blind study. Patients received oral diazepam 10mg with either oral placebo (group I) or 0.5g of ginger (group II) as premedication 1 hour prior to surgery. Standard general anaesthetic techniques and postoperative analgesia were employed. Both group I and group II received intravenous dexamethasone 150 microg/kg immediately before the induction of anaesthesia. Data were recorded over a 24-hour observation period after surgery. RESULTS: In the dexamethasone-treated group, 14 patients experienced nausea, two patients retched, three patients vomited once, two patients vomited repeatedly, and 14 patients required a rescue antiemetic. In the dexamethasone-plus-ginger-treated group, 12 patients experienced nausea, one patient retched, four patients vomited once, no patients vomited repeatedly, and 13 patients required a rescue antiemetic. Dexamethasone plus ginger did not significantly reduce nausea and vomiting compared with dexamethasone alone during the observation period. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the prophylactic combination of antiemetic treatment with dexamethasone and ginger was not clinically or statistically superior to dexamethasone alone in preventing PONV in patients undergoing thyroidectomy.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Comparison of ondansetron, dexamethasone, ondansetron plus dexamethasone and placebo in the prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic tubal ligation.

Laparoscopic tubal ligation is associated with an appreciably high rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of ondansetron, dexamethasone, ondansetron plus dexamethasone or placebo in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients after laparoscopic tubal ligation. In a prospective, randomised, double blind placebo controlled trial, 160 ASA I-II females received one of four regimens; ondansetron 4 mg, dexamethasone 8 mg, ondansetron 4 mg plus dexamethasone 8 mg or placebo (n=40 each) intravenously immediately before induction of anaesthesia. Patients were then observed for 24 hours postoperatively. The incidence of emetic episodes in the ondansetron with dexamethasone group was lower than in the placebo (p<0.001) and ondansetron (p=0.091) and dexamethasone (p=0.143) groups. A complete response (as no postoperative nausea and vomiting) was achieved in 60% of patients given ondansetron, 63% of the patients given dexamethasone, 78% of patients given ondansetron with dexamethasone and 37% of patients received placebo. The prophylactic use of ondansetron with dexamethasone is more effective in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed1994

Ondansetron plus dexamethasone versus metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine in cisplatin-treated patients with ovarian cancer. Italian Group for Antiemetic Research.

Female patients with ovarian cancer are at high risk for emesis. A study evaluating the antiemetic activity and tolerability of ondansetron plus dexamethasone compared to metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine in this group of patients has been performed. A group of 63 patients with ovarian cancer undergoing cisplatin treatment were enrolled in the study. Vomiting, nausea and other side-effects were evaluated by the investigators during the first 24 h and recorded by the patients on a diary card on days 2-4. Ondansetron plus dexamethasone showed a higher antiemetic activity during the first 24 h after cisplatin administration in all three cycles of cisplatin treatment, giving over 90% complete protection from vomiting at the first cycle. The efficacy of ondansetron plus dexamethasone decreased at the second cycle, but the percentage of complete protection from vomiting always remained better than 70%; there was poorer protection in the metoclopramide group, and its effect was similar during all three cycles. Ondansetron plus dexamethasone was also found to be more efficacious than the metoclopramide regimen on the second day after cisplatin administration, while on days 3-4 a high rate of complete protection from emesis was achieved by both antiemetic therapies (> 80%). About 40%-55% of patients receiving ondansetron plus dexamethasone and about 65%-85% of patients treated with metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine reported nausea or vomiting during days 1-4. Ondansetron plus dexamethasone is more efficacious than metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine but new strategies to improve antiemetic efficacy in ovarian cancer patients must be outlined.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

[Dose- and time-dependent dexamethasone effects in cold lesion-induced brain edema in the rat. Experimental research accompanying the German Ultrahigh Dexamethasone Head Injury Study (GUDHIS)].

Experiments in 157 rats were carried out to establish that dose and time of initial dexamethasone therapy after head injury to counteract brain edema are decisive for the antiedematous effect (dose/time response relationship). For this purpose various human doses (weight-related conversion): 20 mg, 100 mg, 500 mg or 2500 mg of dexamethasone with different intervals from the injury: 10 min, 20 min, 40 min or 80 min, were administered in the model of cold lesion induced brain edema. Injury-induced (without therapy), the edema and sodium values increased markedly, and the potassium values decreased. Administration of dexamethasone produced statistically significant dose- and time-dependent effects tending to achieve physiological conditions: An optimal dose of 500 mg of dexamethasone had the highest antiedematous effect, while with still higher doses the effects must be expected to recede again or even be damaging. As expected, pretraumatic dexamethasone doses had the greatest antiedematous effect: reduction by 49%. On administration up to about half an hour after the injury, clearly relevant effects (up to 28%) were still measurable. With longer time intervals between injury and initial dexamethasone administration, e.g. 1 1/2 hours, a measurable but less relevant edema reduction by about 10% can be expected. All posttraumatic effects were achieved experimentally with a maximal dexamethasone therapy period of 21 hours. If similar results are obtained in corresponding clinical studies, the practical recommendation--at least from the animal experimental viewpoint--would be to administer ultra-high cortisone doses (e.g. 500 mg of dexamethasone) as early as possible within the first 2-3 hours after head injury. A cortisone therapy period of more than 2 or 3 days does not appear appropriate. In general no side effects are to be expected with this therapy regimen.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Synthesis and in vitro properties of dexamethasone 21-sulfate sodium as a colon-specific prodrug of dexamethasone.

We synthesized dexamethasone 21-sulfate sodium (DS) as a colon-specific prodrug of dexamethasone and investigated its properties. Introduction of a sulfate group to dexamethasone lowered the apparent partition coefficient from 52.5 to 0.27 in 1-octanol/pH 6.8 phosphate buffer at 37 degrees C. DS was stable on incubation with buffer solutions of varied pH or with the upper intestinal contents of rats at 37 degrees C for 24 h. On incubation with the cecal contents, DS was hydrolyzed by producing dexamethasone over 80% of the dose at 10 h. When DS was incubated with the cecal contents collected from trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitic rats, the degree of prodrug hydrolysis and production of dexamethasone amounted to 70% of healthy rats. In comparison with prednisolone, hydrocortisone, and cortisone, dexamethasone was stable against bioinactivation by the cecal contents, a desirable property for the development of a colon-specific prodrug. These results demonstrated that DS might be delivered specifically to the colon as an intact form to produce dexamethasone in high yield, suggesting DS as a potential colon-specific prodrug of dexamethasone.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

The dexamethasone suppression index: enhancement of DST diagnostic utility for depression by expressing serum cortisol as a function of serum dexamethasone.

The authors sought to determine whether the performance of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) could be enhanced by expressing cortisol as a function of dexamethasone. Because cortisol concentration is a function of the reciprocal of dexamethasone concentration, this relationship was approximated by calculating the product of cortisol and dexamethasone as a dexamethasone suppression index. Preliminary assessment of test performance measures (sensitivity, specificity, and predictive power) showed that use of the dexamethasone suppression index was an improvement over the use of cortisol levels alone. Factoring dexamethasone levels into post-dexamethasone cortisol level measures may enhance the utility of neuroendocrine assessment in psychiatry.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis by the oral neurokinin-1 antagonist, MK-869, in combination with granisetron and dexamethasone or with dexamethasone alone.

PURPOSE: The NK1-receptor antagonist MK-869 (L-754,030) has demonstrated antiemetic activity in humans receiving chemotherapy. Objectives of the present trial included the first assessment of oral MK-869 plus dexamethasone compared with a 5HT(3) antagonist plus dexamethasone for prevention of acute and delayed emesis after high-dose cisplatin. Furthermore, the study sought to confirm that addition of MK-869 to a 5HT(3) antagonist plus dexamethasone was more effective than just the 5HT(3) antagonist plus dexamethasone for prevention of acute and delayed emesis. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group trial in 351 cisplatin-naïve patients evaluated prevention of acute (0 to 24 hours) and delayed emesis (primary efficacy parameter; days 2 to 5) after cisplatin (> or =70 mg/m(2)). Patients were randomized to four groups (I to IV) (n = number randomized; number evaluable): granisetron (10 microg/kg intravenously) pre-cisplatin followed by placebo on days 2 to 5 (group I) (n = 90; 90); granisetron and MK-869 (400 mg PO [by mouth]) pre-cisplatin, followed by MK-869 (300 mg PO) on days 2 to 5 (group II) (n = 86; 84); MK-869 (400 mg PO) the evening before and pre-cisplatin, followed by MK-869 (300 mg PO) on days 2 to 5 (group III) (n = 89; 88); or MK-869 (400 mg PO) pre-cisplatin, followed by MK-869 (300 mg PO) on days 2 to 5 (group IV) (n = 86; 84). All patients also received dexamethasone (20 mg PO) before cisplatin. Additional medication was available to treat emesis or nausea at any time. RESULTS: In the acute period, 57%, 80%, 46%, and 43% of patients were without emesis in groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively (P <.01 for group II v group I). In the delayed period, the proportion of patients without emesis in groups I, II, III, and IV was 29%, 63%, 51%, and 57%, respectively (P <.01 for groups II, III, and IV v group I). The distribution of nausea scores in the delayed period was lower when comparing group II with group I (P <.05 for days 1 to 5 and days 2 to 5). One serious adverse event (dizziness) was rated as possibly related to MK-869. CONCLUSION: Once daily oral administration of MK-869 was effective in reducing delayed emesis and nausea after high-dose cisplatin. However, the combination of the 5HT3 antagonist plus dexamethasone was numerically superior to MK-869 plus dexamethasone in reducing acute emesis. Confirming and extending previous findings, the triple combination of a 5HT(3) antagonist, MK-869, and dexamethasone provided the best control of acute emesis.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Anterior pituitary trophic responses to dexamethasone withdrawal and repeated dexamethasone exposures.

Glucocorticoid withdrawal, depending on the dose and duration of treatment, results in a transient but sometimes prolonged reduction in hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis secretory responsiveness. As the anatomic basis of HPA axis suppression remains uncertain, we have directly examined changes in trophic activity within the rat anterior pituitary gland following dexamethasone withdrawal and re-treatment. Treatment of adrenalectomised, male Wistar rats with dexamethasone results in a discrete, highly significant burst of apoptosis in the anterior pituitary with concurrent suppression of mitosis. Despite a surge in mitotic activity immediately after dexamethasone withdrawal, calculated total anterior pituitary cell populations remain below that seen in untreated adrenalectomised controls. Repeated exposures to dexamethasone show that the dexamethasone-sensitive cell population that is deleted by apoptosis is partially but not completely restored. As the amplitude of apoptotic bursts induced by second and third dexamethasone exposures are similar but smaller than that induced by initial exposure, it appears that the very first exposure to dexamethasone deletes a subset of anterior pituitary cells that are either not restored at all, or are only replaced very slowly. The reduced proportion of corticotrophs contributing to the increase in mitotic index after dexamethasone withdrawal corroborates this. Although continued cell turnover within the pituitary predicts that the absolute cellular deficit would diminish with time, the effects seen may contribute to the delayed recovery of pituitary axis function following cessation of glucocorticoid treatment.

Adrenalectomy↗
PubMed1993

Dexamethasone pharmacokinetics in clinically normal dogs during low- and high-dose dexamethasone suppression testing.

Dexamethasone pharmacokinetics was studied in 10 healthy dogs receiving high-dose administration of dexamethasone (dosage, 0.1 mg/kg of body weight, IV), alone or combined with ACTH (dosage, 0.5 U/kg, IV), or low-dose administration of dexamethasone (dosage, 0.01 mg/kg, IV) in an incomplete cross-over design. Serum samples were obtained at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, 720, 1,080, 1,440, 1,920, 2,400, and 2,880 minutes after dexamethasone administration; dexamethasone was measured by radioimmunoassay validated for use in dogs. Dexamethasone pharmacokinetics was adequately described by a two-compartment first-order open model. Comparison of pharmacokinetics for the low- and high-dose protocols revealed dose dependence; area under the curve, mean residence time, clearance, and volume of distribution increased significantly when dexamethasone dosage increased. The elimination rate constant was significantly (P < 0.05) less, and the elimination half-life significantly greater for the high-dose protocols; however, the distribution rate constant and distribution half-life were not significantly different when high-dose protocols were compared with the low-dose protocol. Dose-dependent increases in volume of distribution and clearance may be related to saturation of protein-binding sites. Concurrent administration of ACTH did not affect dexamethasone disposition.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed2000

Intravenous dexamethasone for extubation of newborn infants.

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal tubes are foreign bodies that may injure the upper airway causing laryngeal edema. This in turn may result in failure of extubation in preterm infants. Corticosteroids have been used prophylactically to reduce upper airway obstruction and facilitate extubation. OBJECTIVES: In newborn infants having their endotracheal tube removed following a period of intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV), what are the effects of intravenous corticosteroids on the incidence of endotracheal reintubation, stridor, atelectasis and adverse side effects? SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, Medline (MeSH search terms "dexamethasone", "extubat*" and "exp infant, newborn"), previous reviews including cross references, abstracts of conferences and symposia proceedings, expert informants, journal handsearching mainly in the English language and expert informant searches in the Japanese language by Prof. Y. Ogawa. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were included which used random or quasi-random patient allocation, and which compared intravenous steroids given immediately prior to a planned extubation with placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by the two authors and analysed in Revman for all trials. Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed to examine differences in response between infants at high risk for upper airway edema and those receiving routine prophylaxis prior to extubation. MAIN RESULTS: Administration of dexamethasone prior to extubation significantly reduced the need for reintubation of the trachea. This result applies to both the high risk group and to the total population of infants enrolled. However, the incidence of extubation failure was zero in the trial that attempted to exclude infants at high risk of airway edema. The side effects of higher blood sugar levels and glycosuria were found in the 2 trials where these were sought. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Implications for practice Dexamethasone reduces the need for endotracheal reintubation of neonates after a period of IPPV. In view of the lack of effect in low risk infants and the documented and potential side effects, it appears reasonable to restrict its use to infants at increased risk for airway edema and obstruction, such as those who have received repeated or prolonged intubations. Implications for research Issues of dosage and applicability to the extremely low birthweight population could be addressed in future trials. Longer term outcomes such as chronic lung disease, duration of assisted ventilation and length of hospital stay should also be examined.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗
PubMed1987

Dexamethasone suppression test and plasma dexamethasone levels in bulimia.

A 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was carried out in 66 women with bulimia and in 26 age- and sex-matched controls. Blood samples were obtained at 4 PM on the day following dexamethasone ingestion, and levels of cortisol and of dexamethasone in the plasma were measured. Thirty-two percent of the patients vs only 7% of the controls had plasma cortisol levels of 140 nmol/L (5 micrograms/dL) or greater following the DST (a positive DST). The plasma levels of dexamethasone varied substantially, and there was a significant inverse relationship between the plasma level of cortisol and that of dexamethasone. Patients with positive DST results had lower levels of plasma dexamethasone than did those with negative DST results, and the mean plasma level of dexamethasone was lower in the bulimic group than in the control group. These results suggest that factors other than a disturbance of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity may contribute to positive DST results in bulimia.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of topical 0.7% dexamethasone-cyclodextrin with 0.1% dexamethasone sodium phosphate for postcataract inflammation.

BACKGROUND: To compare 0.7% dexamethasone-cyclodextrin aqueous eye drop solution applied once daily with 0.1% dexamethasone sodium phosphate eye drops applied three times a day for the control of postoperative inflammation after cataract surgery. METHODS: Twenty cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation were randomly divided into two postoperative treatment groups. Postoperative medication in group I included 0.1% dexamethasone sodium phosphate eye drops three times daily and in group II 0.7% dexamethasone-cyclodextrin eye drop solution once daily. Testing of visual acuity, biomicroscopic examination, applanation tonometry and laser flare cell meter (LFCM) examination were carried out before operation and days 1, 3, 7 and 21 after surgery. RESULTS: Preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, aqueous flare and cells in biomicroscopic examination, and the mean intraocular pressure did not show any statistically significant differences between the treatment groups. LFCM examination showed that the mean postoperative photon count values (P=0.032) and the median cell count values on the 1st (P=0.014), 3rd (P=0.031), 7th (P=0.034), and 21st (P=0.0097) postoperative days in group I were more elevated than in group II. CONCLUSIONS: 0.7% dexamethasone-cyclodextrin eye drops applied once daily is a more effective postoperative anti-inflammatory medication than 0.1% dexamethasone sodium phosphate applied three times a day. In both groups, 3 weeks after the operation the mean visual acuity was normal and intraocular pressure significantly lower than before operation. The use of 0.7% dexamethasone-cyclodextrin eye drops may be useful especially in elderly people who cannot apply themselves the eye drops onto the eye.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1986

The effect of serum dexamethasone concentrations in the dexamethasone suppression test.

Serum dexamethasone and cortisol concentrations were measured in a sample of 98 psychiatric inpatients during the course of the 1-mg oral overnight Dexamethasone Suppression Test (DST). Suppressors were found to have significantly higher serum dexamethasone concentrations than nonsuppressors at each time of sampling (8:00 AM, 4:00 PM, and 11:00 PM). There was a significant inverse curvilinear relationship between serum dexamethasone and cortisol concentrations at each sample time. Although serum dexamethasone concentration was a potent determinant of postdexamethasone serum cortisol concentration, there were still significantly higher serum concentrations of cortisol in patients with major depression compared with patients with other disorders when dexamethasone concentrations were statistically controlled. By taking serum dexamethasone concentrations into account in defining DST suppression status, a modest increase in diagnostic specificity was achieved, but no substantial change in sensitivity.

Adult↗