Aerospace physiological optics. I. Depth perception.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
1. The ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve (V1), which carries extraocular proprioceptive afferents, was sectioned unilaterally or bilaterally in kittens and adult cats. Depth perception was measured behaviorally in these sectioned cats, as well as in control cats. 2. For kittens that underwent unilateral V1 sections at 6-11 wk of age, postsurgical values of binocular depth perception--measured 1.5-3 mo later--were 2-3 times worse than in normal control animals. Cats that underwent unilateral V1 sections as adults, however, showed no postsurgical deficits in binocular depth perception. 3. For kittens that underwent bilateral V1 sections at 6.5-7.5 wk of age, similar longterm impairments were found in binocular depth perception. No impairment was found in two kittens bilaterally sectioned at 11.5 wk of age. A cat that underwent bilateral sections as an adult also showed no binocular depth perception deficits. 4. Although these behavioral effects were observed only when unilateral and bilateral V1 sections were performed up to a certain age in development, they differed in two ways. 1) Imbalance of extraocular proprioceptive inflow produced by unilateral section had a deleterious effect at an age when the final adult level had been reached. At that stage, complete suppression of inflow produced by the bilateral section failed to impair the final level of binocular performance. 2) Short-term effects observed during the week following the section appeared in bilaterally operated animals as a transient freezing of the presurgical binocular performance whatever the age of the section during the sensitive period. In contrast, short-term effects produced by unilateral section were found to be age dependent: a progressive slowing down in the normal rate of improvement of binocular thresholds was observed following a section performed at 5 wk of age; an arrest in development was found when surgery was done at 6-7 wk of age. A significant impairment appeared within 2 days when the section was performed at 11 wk of age. 5. In all experimental kittens, monocular depth perception thresholds were unaffected or impaired only to a minor extent (less than 15% change) following the unilateral or bilateral section. In unilaterally operated kittens, there were no consistent differences associated with the side of the section. 6. A sham-operated kitten, in which the V1 was visualized but not cut, showed no impairments in binocular or monocular depth perception.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
PURPOSE: It is common practice to administer stereopsis tests such as the Randot Stereotest to prospective employees for occupations requiring depth perception. However, there is no evidence that stereoacuity measured with tests such as the Randot Stereotest will predict an individual's ability to perform a depth perception task at near. METHODS: Forty-eight people with normal binocular vision were tested on 2 practical depth perception tests, and their stereoacuity was measured with the Randot Stereotest. RESULTS: There was little correlation between stereoacuity and either of the practical tasks (r<+/-0.1). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that Randot stereoacuity does not reliably predict depth perception ability for people who enjoy normal binocular vision. A better method for determining depth perception ability might be to issue a practical depth perception task.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is associated with postural instability and an increased risk of falling which is facilitated by a variety of factors including diminished visual acuity, diplopia, ataxia, apraxia of gait, and peripheral neuropathy. Deficient binocular depth perception may also contribute to a higher incidence of postural instability and falling in these patients who, for example, find it an extremely difficult task to walk on uneven ground, over curbs, or up and down steps. I report a 51 year old woman with secondary progressive MS who experienced difficulties with binocular depth perception resulting in frequent falls and injuries. Deficient depth perception was demonstrated also on spontaneous drawing of a cube. Following a series of transcranial treatments with AC pulsed electromagnetic fields (EMFs) of 7,5 picotesla flux density, the patient experienced a major improvement in depth perception which was evident particularly on ascending and descending stairs. These clinical changes were associated with an improvement in spatial organization and depth perception on drawing a cube. These findings suggest that in MS impairment of depth perception, which is encoded in the primary visual cortex (area 17) and visual association cortex (areas 18 and 19), may be improved by administration of AC pulsed EMFs of picotesla flux density. The primary visual cortex is densely innervated by serotonergic neurons which modulate visual information processing. Cerebral serotonin concentrations are diminished in MS patients and at least some aspects of deficient depth perception in MS may be related to dysfunction of serotonergic transmission in the primary visual cortex. It is suggested that transcranial AC pulsed applications of EMFs improve depth perception partly by augmenting serotonergic transmission in the visual cortex.
Monocular depth perception was compared with binocular depth perception in 5- and 7-month-old infants. Reaching was used as the dependent measure. Two objects, identical except in size, were presented simultaneously to each infant. The smaller object was within reach for the infants while the larger object was just beyond reach. The two objects subtended equal visual angles from the infants' observation point. With binocular presentation, 96% of the 7-month-olds' reaches and 89% of the 5-month-olds' reaches were for the nearer object. With monocular presentation, 58% of the 7-month-olds' reaches and 65% of the 5-month-olds' reaches were for the nearer object. The reaching preferences observed in the monocular condition indicated sensitivity to monocular depth information (motion parallax, accommodation, and relative size information were available). Binocular viewing, however, resulted in a far more consistent tendency to reach for the nearer object. This result suggests that the infants' perception of the objects' distances was more veridical in the binocular condition than in the monocular condition.
PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that extraretinal cues related to vergence angle and lens accommodation are used to scale horizontal disparities for fixation distance. METHODS: Depth perception of random dot stereograms was studied in 10 healthy adult subjects with normal visual acuity by modifying retinal disparity, fixation distance, vergence angle, and accommodation. Statistical analysis was used to compare the data. RESULTS: Depth perception increased with fixation distance. The increment of depth perception persisted even when horizontal retinal disparity was kept constant. The magnitude of depth perception was independent of vergence angle. Depth perception did not vary with changes in accommodation. CONCLUSIONS: Extraretinal cues related to vergence angle and accommodation seem to be not necessary to scale horizontal disparities for viewing distance.
The purpose of the study was to examine differences in depth perception of students classified according to their gross locomotor skills. The seven qualitative gross locomotor tasks of Ulrich's Test of Gross and Motor Development were used to classify 162 students as either motor impaired (n1 =27) or nonimpaired (n2= 135). The Howard Dollman Apparatus was used to measure depth perception. Analysis showed that the motor-impaired group scored significantly lower than the nonimpaired group on depth perception. Discriminant function analysis indicated that only the running task separated the students by depth perception scores. Subsequent multiple regression analysis confirmed that the running task, along with sliding and galloping, were significant predictors of the students' perception of the third dimension. Physical educators working with students with gross locomotor impairments or low perception of the third dimension need to adjust their teaching and offer opportunities for successful involvement in physical education classes and sports.
Depth perception was studied in adult cats following removal of the left cerebral hemisphere as a neonate or as an adult. Both monocular and binocular thresholds were determined using a visual cliff. Although both age-at-lesion groups showed depth perception deficits, the neonatal-lesioned animals performed much worse under binocular conditions on the visual cliff than either adult-lesioned or intact animals. This was primarily due to the lack of a binocular advantage in the neonatal-lesioned cats since their monocular thresholds were similar to that of adult-lesioned animals. Both lesioned groups showed higher monocular thresholds compared to intact animals but this effect reached significance only for the right eye. In addition, the neonatal-lesioned cats showed ocular misalignment which may have contributed to their lack of binocular depth perception. Regardless of these deficits neonatal-lesioned cats were more like intact controls regarding the types of errors made on the visual cliff. Neonatal-lesioned animals and intact controls made random errors, whereas adult-lesioned animals made most of their errors when the shallow shelf was presented on the animals' right side. This may indicate that the adult-lesioned animals have greater motor and/or visual field biases than do neonatal-lesioned cats.
Neurons selective for binocular disparity form the neural substrate for stereoscopic depth perception and are found in several areas of primate visual cortex. Presumably, multiple representations of disparity exist to serve different functions, but the specific contributions of different visual areas to depth perception remain poorly understood. We examine this issue by comparing the contributions of the middle temporal (MT) area to performance of two depth discrimination tasks: a "coarse" task that involves discrimination between absolute disparities in the presence of noise, and a "fine" task that involves discrimination of very small differences in relative disparity between two stimuli in the absence of noise. In the fine task, we find that electrical microstimulation of MT does not affect perceptual decisions, although many individual MT neurons have sufficient sensitivity to account for behavioral performance. In contrast, microstimulation at the same recording sites does bias depth percepts in the coarse task. We hypothesized that these results may be explained by the fact that MT neurons do not represent relative disparity signals that are thought to be essential for the fine task. This hypothesis was supported by single-unit recordings that show that MT neurons signal absolute, but not relative, disparities in a stimulus configuration similar to that used in the fine task. This work establishes a link between the neural representation of disparity in MT and the functional contributions of this area to depth perception.
Scientific establishment of the no-effect response to finite levels of exposure to a physical or chemical agent is indeed a rigorous exercise and is frequently controversial. In earlier research by Slutsky under direction of the senior author, a statistically significant increase in stereoscopic depth perception error was noted among 24 test subjects exposed to high intensity noise. Additional extensive research reported in this paper indicates that error in stereoscopic depth perception is not significantly altered by exposure to continuous white noise of short duration at levels ranging from 70 to 115 dBA. Furthernore, exposure of humans for periods of a few minutes to white noise in octave bands centered on 250 Hz, 1000 Hz, 4 kHz and 16 kHz at 115 dB does not affect their depth perception measured by the Howard-Dolman test. A comprehensive analysis of depth perception errors measured under noise exposure conditions (n = 4040) in comparison with those obtained under control conditions (n = 1430) produced a mean change in error of -0.38 mm, a statistically insignificant difference (p = 0.17). Even if such an error were attributable to high level noise, it should be noted that minus sign designates an improvement of depth perception in noise and that it is difficult to imagine visual tasks in which change in error of +/-0.38 mm at a distance of 6.0 meters is meaningful.
The present study was initiated following a report that a few helicopter pilots had failed a test of stereoscopic depth perception after a prolonged training flight employing night vision goggles (NVGs). In order to determine the cause of the loss, 12 helicopter pilots/copilots were assessed for depth perception, lateral and vertical phoria, and contrast sensitivity before and after training flights requiring the pilots to wear night vision goggles for the duration of the flight. Pilots flew one to three missions while wearing either PVS-5A or AN/AVS-6 goggles. Mission duration ranged from 1 to 4 h. The results indicate that contrast sensitivity and depth perception when monocular cues are present did not degrade over the course of the mission. Lateral phoria, however, did demonstrate an average exophoric shift of 1.5 prism diopters for 12 out of the 24 missions. The results indicate that the original report of a loss of depth perception based on a test of depth requiring stereopsis might have been caused by a shift in lateral phoria. It would be expected that as additional fusional effort is required, the minimum resolvable disparity degrades due to the increase in accommodation brought about through vergence accommodation. Possible causes for the phoria shift and future testing are discussed.
Binocular and monocular depth discrimination thresholds were obtained from cats which had been monocularly deprived either from the time of natural eye opening or else at the age of 4 months. Among normal cats, binocular depth thresholds typically are very much better than monocular thresholds, allowing the inference that normal cats have good stereopsis. For the early-deprived animals in the present study, only those whose deprived eyes were opened by 30 days of age showed any binocular advantage. Deprivation periods lasting to 35 days or older completely eliminated the binocular superiority, with no sign of any recovery. These results provide behavioral evidence that binocular visual mechanisms are extremely susceptible to disruption and, unlike those underlying visual acuity, do not have the potential for recovery. The effect of deprivation imposed later in life was quite different. Three cats, deprived for 1, 2 or 3 months respectively, beginning at the age of 4 months, showed no deficits in binocular depth perception. This latter finding implies the existence of a sensitive period for stereopsis which is over completely by the age of 4 months.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which multifocal glasses impair contrast sensitivity and depth perception at critical distances required for detecting hazards in the environment and whether multifocal glasses use increases the risk of falls in older people. DESIGN: One-year prospective cohort study. SETTING: Falls Laboratory, Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-six community-dwelling people aged 63-90. MEASUREMENTS: Contrast sensitivity, depth perception, accidental falls. RESULTS: Eighty-seven subjects (55.8%) were regular wearers of multifocal (bifocal, trifocal, or progressive lens) glasses. These subjects performed significantly worse in the distant depth perception and distant edge-contrast sensitivity tests in conditions that forced them to view test stimuli through the lower segments of their glasses. Multifocal glasses wearers were more than twice as likely to fall in the follow-up period than nonmultifocal glasses wearers (odds ratio (OR) = 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-4.92), when adjusting for age, poor vision, reduced lower limb sensation and strength, slow reaction time, and increased postural sway. Multifocal glasses wearers were also more likely to fall because of a trip (OR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.08-7.22), when outside their homes (OR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.14-5.70), and when walking up or down stairs (P <.01). The population attributable risks of regular multifocal glasses use were 35.2% for any falls, 40.9% for falls due to a trip, and 40.9% for falls outside the home. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings indicate that multifocal glasses impair depth perception and edge-contrast sensitivity at critical distances for detecting obstacles in the environment. Older people may benefit from wearing nonmultifocal glasses when negotiating stairs and in unfamiliar settings outside the home.
Depth perception was examined in 50 patients with brain lesions and in 16 controls using a polaroid test (Titmus). Error percentage and response time were measured. Intellectually impaired patients performed significantly worse than intellectually normal patients. On the other hand, location of the cerebral lesion (right, left, or generalized) had no significant effect; zero error percentages were observed among intellectually normal patients even with right or left parietal lesions. Intellectually normal patients did not differ from healthy controls.
Relative changes in depth perception and amplitude of VEPs were compared when the dot density in static random dot stereograms was altered. The maximum amplitudes of negative potentials evoked by either stereogram or uncorrelogram were recorded from the occipital region of human scalp. The peak latency was in the range of 160 to 260 msec, averaging 197 msec in 18 subjects. The amplitude of negative potentials evoked by either stereogram or uncorrelogram was always larger than that evoked by correlogram. The amplitudes on either stereograms, uncorrelograms or correlograms did not significantly increase when the dot density was increased, and there was no significant difference in amplitude on either stereogram or uncorrelogram. Depth perception did not closely correlate with the dot density nor with the amplitude of negative potentials. These results suggest that the amplitude of negative potentials may represent activities of disparity-sensitive neurons elicited in a trigger feature manner, but it does not reflect activities of the higher order process of depth perception.
It has been hypothesised that one possible function of paradoxical (REM) sleep is the maintenance of facilitation of co-ordinated eye movements. A prediction from this hypothesis is that binocular depth perception will be more accurate at the end of periods of paradoxical sleep than at the beginning. The results from previous studies are conflicting. Using two groups of eight healthy male volunteers in a two factor repeated measures design, it was found that for a period of paradoxical sleep in the second half of the night only, there was an improvement in binocular depth perception accuracy between the beginning and end of paradoxical sleep. The accuracy at the end of the paradoxical sleep was not significantly different to that on going to bed or on awakening in the morning; the effect was due to a large decrease in accuracy at the start of the REM period. There was no effect of paradoxical sleep on binocular depth perception in the early part of the night. Monocular depth perception accuracy was unaffected by paradoxical sleep.
INTRODUCTION: Julesz named the ability of depth perception in random dot stereograms as "global stereopsis". At present there are only high-density random dot stereograms with different disparities in use in the ophthalmological practice. The aim of our exploration is to measure the effects on pattern recognition and depth perception by thinning out the dot density in random dot stereograms down to very low levels (< 1%). METHODS: Experiments were performed by 43 volunteer observers using two sequences of random dot stereograms. Each sequence has its own constant disparity and within a sequence the dot density decreased to values less than 1%. Additionally we compared the performance in these tests with the performance in the conventional haploscopic stereoscopic tests (Titmus, TNO, Randot). RESULTS: Of the observers 48.8% (n = 21) were able to establish a complete depth perception and pattern recognition ("global stereopsis") at a matrix dot density of 0.3% and a disparity of 730" (12, 17'). Another group of subjects (48.8%, n = 21) saw the sub-matrix at 0.3% dot density in depth as a star field ("local stereopsis") but was not able to recognise the form of the sub-matrix. A significant correlation does not exist between these results and those from the conventional stereoscopic test. DISCUSSION: We assume from these results that the very low density random dot stereograms measure a new quality of stereoscopic vision, from which we can obtain information about the density of cortical binocular activated elements in the human brain.