Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DELIRIUM”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Is delirium different when it occurs in dementia? A study using the delirium rating scale.

The authors studied 61 geropsychiatric patients with delirium from a cohort of 843 consecutive admissions to a geriatric clinical research unit. A central study goal was to assess how the presence of dementia affected the presentation of delirium. Eighteen delirious (D) and 43 delirious-demented (D-D) patients were compared on the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and EEG. D-D patients had lower MMSE scores, but no differences were found in total DRS or BPRS scores or in EEG grade. DRS items were similar in the two groups except that D-D had more cognitive impairment than D. An exploratory principal components analysis of DRS items identified two core factors. The authors conclude that the presentation of delirium in the setting of concurrent dementia is very similar to delirium without dementia, with subtle differences probably attributable to dementia.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The delirium symptom interview: an interview for the detection of delirium symptoms in hospitalized patients.

To study delirium in hospitalized elderly, a delirium symptom interview (DSI) was developed by an interdisciplinary group of investigators. This interview was administered in an acute care hospital to 50 patients who were over the age of 65 years. Results from the interview were compared to assessments of major symptoms of delirium made independently by a neurologist and a psychiatrist. This interview had good validity and reliability. The sensitivity of the DSI was .90 and the specificity was .80, when compared with the clinical judgment of a psychiatrist and neurologist. Interrater reliability, using lay interviewers, was .90 for the detection of major symptoms of delirium. These results indicate that the DSI could be used by lay interviewers to assess reliably the symptoms of delirium.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

The Delirium Observation Screening Scale: a screening instrument for delirium.

The Delirium Observation Screening (DOS) scale, a 25-item scale, was developed to facilitate early recognition of delirium, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV criteria, based on nurses' observations during regular care. The scale was tested for content validity by a group of seven experts in the field of delirium. Internal consistency, predictive validity, and concurrent and construct validity were tested in two prospective studies with high risk groups of patients: geriatric medicine patients and elderly hip fracture patients. Among the patients admitted to a geriatric department (N = 82), 4 became delirious; among the elderly hip fracture patients (N = 92), 18 became delirious. The DOS scale was determined to be content valid and showed high internal consistency, alpha = 0.93 and alpha = 0.96. Predictive validity against the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV diagnosis of delirium made by a geriatrician was good in both studies. Correlations of the DOS scale with the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) were Rs -0.79 (p < or = 0.001) in the hip fracture patients and Rs -0.66 (p < or = 0.001) in the geriatric medicine patients. Concurrent validity, as tested by comparison of the research nurse's ratings of the DOS scale and the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), for the group of hip fracture patients was 0.63 (p < or = 0.001). Construct validity of the DOS was tested against the Informant Questionnaire of Cognitive Decline in Elderly (IQCODE), a preexisting psychiatric diagnosis and the Barthel Index. Correlation with the IQCODE was 0.74 (p < or = 0.001) in the study with the hip fracture patients and 0.33 (p < or = 0.05) in the study with the geriatric medicine patients. Correlation with the Barthel Index was -0.26 (p < or = 0.05) in the geriatric medicine patients and -0.55 (p < or = 0.001) in the hip fracture patients. The overall conclusion of these studies is that the DOS scale shows satisfactory validity and reliability, to guide early recognition of delirium by nurses' observation.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2005

Fast, systematic, and continuous delirium assessment in hospitalized patients: the nursing delirium screening scale.

Because no rigorously validated, simple yet accurate continuous delirium assessment instrument exists, we developed the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC). The Nu-DESC is an observational five-item scale that can be completed quickly. To test the validity of the Nu-DESC, 146 consecutive hospitalized patients from a prospective cohort study were continuously assessed for delirium symptoms by bedside nurses using the Nu-DESC. Psychometric properties of Nu-DESC screening were established using 59 blinded Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) ratings made by research nurses and psychiatrists. DSM-IV criteria and the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) were rated along with CAM assessments. Analysis of these data showed that the Nu-DESC is psychometrically valid and has a sensitivity and specificity of 85.7% and 86.8%, respectively. These values are comparable to those of the MDAS, a longer instrument. Nu-DESC and DSM-IV sensitivities were similar. The Nu-DESC appears to be well-suited for widespread clinical use in busy oncology inpatient settings and shows promise as a research instrument.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

A nursing protocol to assess causes of delirium. Identifying delirium in nursing home residents.

Because delirium is often a harbinger of underlying physical illness in frail elders--which can cause further morbidity and functional decline--it is essential to accurately assess the causes of delirium. Nurses working in nursing homes are in the best position to make these assessments and advocate for the appropriate management of delirium. The implementation of the proposed nursing protocol may empower nurses and, thus, improve outcomes of nursing home residents suffering from delirium.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Outcome of delirium: Part 1. Outcome of delirium diagnosed by DSM-III-R, ICD-10 and CAMDEX and derivation of the Reversible Cognitive Dysfunction Scale among acute geriatric inpatients.

OBJECTIVE: To study performance of DSM-III-R, ICD-10 and CAMDEX diagnoses of delirium as predictors of improvement in mental state in survivors, and to develop a brief rating scale which will predict reversibility of cognitive dysfunction. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Acute geriatric inpatient units. PATIENTS: A random sample of consecutive acute admissions of patients over the age of 65 (N = 80). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Serial assessments of mental state and cognitive function and observational data. Establishment of DSM-III-R, ICD-10, CAMDEX diagnoses. OUTCOME MEASURE: Patients with more than five points of 20% improvement in Mini Mental State Examination following the most severely impaired assessment operationally designated 'reversible cognitive dysfunction'. MAIN RESULTS: Diagnoses of delirium by DSM-III-R and ICD-10 do not predict improvement in cognitive function well; CAMDEX does rather better. Discriminant function analysis yielded the Reversible Cognitive Dysfunction Scale (RCDS), a simple clinical scale which accurately predicted improvement. This comprised reduced conscious level, poor attention, poor contact with the patient, incoherent speech, reduced psychomotor activity, lack of awareness of surroundings and poor orientation and memory. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of and diagnostic criteria for delirium should be reconsidered. The RCDS merits further evaluation.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1989

[L-tryptophan in pre-delirium and delirium conditions].

The effect of the serotonin precursor l-tryptophan on delirium and pre-delirium states was studied in a prospective study on 32 patients. Patients were given 3 infusions each containing 2.5 g l-tryptophan, a day for at least 7 days. The status of the patients was examined with the Mini Mental State Examination, the SCAG (Sandoz Clinical Assessment Geriatric Scale) and a sleep/awake observation sheet. These showed that the patients experienced significant trends toward improvement. Relevant side effects and interactions were not observed. The application of supplemental tranquilizers could be reduced and in 5 cases it was not necessary at all. It was only necessary to apply l-tryptophan for longer than 7 days in 4 of 32 patients. Furthermore, under this medication no patient in a state of predelirium at delivery into the hospital developed full delirium tremens.

Alcohol Withdrawal Delirium↗
PubMed2004

The Strain of Care for Delirium Index: a new instrument to assess nurses' strain in caring for patients with delirium.

This study evaluated content validity, internal consistency and construct validity of the Strain of Care for Delirium Index (SCDI), a newly constructed instrument to measure the strain nurses experience in caring for patients with delirium. Content validity, evaluated by eight experts, reduced the initial pool of items from 38 to 28. Using a convenience sample of 190 nurses, Cronbach's alpha for the 28-item version was 0.88. Using non-linear principal components analysis another eight items were eliminated and a four-factor structure was identified. The proportion of variance explained by the remaining 20 items was 61.51%. Preliminary psychometric evaluation of the SCDI supported content validity, internal consistency and construct validity; however additional psychometric evaluation is warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Measuring delirium severity in older general hospital inpatients without dementia. The Delirium Severity Scale.

The authors evaluated the validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change of the Delirium Severity Scale (DSS), a 10-minute assessment consisting of Forward Digit Span and Similarities. Twenty-two older inpatients with delirium but not dementia and 15 control patients were administered the DSS during hospitalization. Scores were significantly inversely correlated with experts' quantitative ratings of severity at all three time-points examined. The DSS showed significant improvement over time (P < 0.001) and significant correlation with improvement in expert ratings (P = 0.026). The DSS shows promise as a valid and reliable measure sensitive to changing symptom severity.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1997

Outcome of delirium: part 2. Clinical features of reversible cognitive dysfunction--are they the same as accepted definitions of delirium?

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical features of reversible cognitive dysfunction. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Acute geriatric inpatient units. PATIENTS: A random sample of consecutive acute admissions of patients over the age of 65 (N = 80). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Serial assessments of mental state and cognitive function and observational data. OUTCOME MEASURE: Patients with more than five points of 20% improvement in Mini Mental State Examination following the most severely impaired assessment operationally designated 'reversible cognitive dysfunction'. The clinical features of those with RCD are compared with those with non-reversible cognitive dysfunction. MAIN RESULTS: Delusions, hallucinations, aggression, excitement, irritability and other 'active' symptoms were not commoner in RCD than in non-reversible cognitive dysfunction (non-RCD). By contrast, 'quiet' signs, such as plucking at bedclothes, poor attention, incoherent speech, abnormal associations, slow, vague thought and fluctuating mental state were more marked in RCD than in non-RCD. CONCLUSIONS: Reversible cognitive dysfunction is a quiet and unobtrusive disorder.

Acting Out↗