Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Current Procedural Terminology”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

CPT (current procedure terminology) coding and patient accounting: controlling the process and improving billing efficiency.

As outpatient volumes increase in hospitals across the country, more and more coding responsibilities are being placed with the patient accounts department. Both registration and outpatient billers are involved in assigning current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for surgery and emergency room procedures, as well as maintaining the hospital's chargemaster. Often these responsibilities are assigned without regard for the level of coding expertise and degree of clinical knowledge of the personnel involved, which can lead to significant loss of reimbursement and untimely billing delays. This article addresses common problems and offers suggestions for improving coding, minimizing problems, and increasing billing efficiency.

Abstracting and Indexing↗
PubMed1992

Survey of the degree to which critical care nurses are performing current procedural terminology-coded services.

PURPOSE: To identify the degree to which current procedural terminology-coded services are provided by critical care nurses. Current procedural terminology codes are used by government and private insurers for reimbursement for office, home, hospital, nursing home and emergency department services. METHOD: Out of 100 randomly selected registered nurses invited to participate in this national survey, 43 completed the survey questionnaire. The majority of respondents were 18 to 40 years old, had a bachelor's degree, had practiced nursing between 5 and 10 years, and were employed as staff or charge nurses in an intensive care or emergency room setting. RESULTS: More than 70% of the group were found to perform 28 codes. The codes performed by the greatest number (42) were blood or blood component transfusion and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. One-way analysis of variance applied to the amount of supervision the nurses received while performing the codes and the educational level of the nurses revealed a significant difference between the groups. Post hoc analysis of all possible group comparisons showed that diploma-prepared nurses reported significantly more supervision than nurses having a bachelor's or master's degree. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study indicates that critical care nurses frequently perform selected codes with little or no supervision by a physician.

Abstracting and Indexing↗
PubMed2000

Hidden costs of infertility treatment in employee health benefits plans.

OBJECTIVES: Many employers exclude infertility treatment from coverage under their health benefits plans. However, infertility treatment is often provided under other diagnoses or in association with therapy rendered for other disease processes. This study attempted to estimate those hidden costs and to determine what the impact would be of providing coverage for infertility treatment. STUDY DESIGN: A 1-year retrospective analysis was carried out to isolate the hidden costs of infertility treatment from specific medical claims data gathered from a large representative employer with no infertility benefit provided. Data were analyzed in the context of the claims experience of a health plan covering approximately 28,000 employees. Infertility treatment was excluded under this plan. Medical claims for specific procedures and diagnoses in 1996 were analyzed by using Current Procedural Terminology codes in conjunction with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes to estimate the hidden costs of infertility treatment. Forty-one Current Procedural Terminology codes and 68 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were used for the analysis. Clinical practice experience was used to set boundaries (conservative and moderate estimate) regarding the likelihood of a given treatment being associated with infertility. This was compared with 100% covered charges to generate claims per employee per month. Procedures covered operative, diagnostic, and laboratory services. These figures were used to compute a range of cost for infertility treatment per member per month. RESULTS: Forty-one Current Procedural Terminology codes were identified that indicated possible infertility treatment. These covered the areas of laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery, lysis of adhesions, neosalpingostomy, cyst drainage, oocyte retrieval or embryo transfer, echography, and various hormonal analyses. Sixty-eight International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes indicated the possibility of infertility treatment. These included endocrine disorders, various uterine pathologic conditions, pelvic pain, endometriosis, pregnancy loss, irregular menses, and various ovulatory dysfunctions. The retrospective analysis found that 35 Current Procedural Terminology codes were involved in claims highly indicative of infertility services, such as 56353, hysteroscopic division of uterine septum, and 58345, transcervical fallopian tube catheterization. According to the 35 Current Procedural Terminology codes, $603,807.95 would have been paid if 100% of the charges had been covered; this would have resulted in a claim per employee per month of $1.12 by conservative estimate to $0.60 by moderate estimate. Computed cost figures per member per month showed the hidden costs of infertility to range between $0.27 and $0.50. CONCLUSION: On the basis of various cost studies, rate filings, and employee data, the cost of providing coverage for infertility treatment has previously been shown to vary between $0.20 and $2.00 per member per month. Through appropriate cost sharing, managed care, and algorithms, infertility coverage can be offered at a cost of $0.40 to $0.50 per member per month. This analysis indicates that at least some employers already pay this much even when infertility is specifically excluded under the plan.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Survey of the degree to which ET nurses are performing current procedural terminology-coded services.

ET nurses practice in many different settings including hospitals, home health, independent practice, and contract services. Reimbursement for their services is widely varied. To contribute meaningfully to health care reform, the services being provided by ET nurses must be identified. Familiarity with how these services overlap with those provided by other health care providers is essential. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, the language of payment within the health care system, are prepared and published annually by the American Medical Association for purposes of physician payment. Physicians are being paid for services that are also performed by ET nurses. This study identifies the CPT-coded services used in the practice of the ET nurse and also codes that overlap those for which physicians are paid. Identification of ET nurse-provided CPT-coded services delineates the ET nursing scope of practice and may serve as a foundation to address other practice issues, including reimbursement.

Abstracting and Indexing↗
PubMed2006

Assessing performance, productivity, and staffing needs in pathology groups: observations from the College of American Pathologists PathFocus pathology practice activity and staffing program.

CONTEXT: The PathFocus program affords the opportunity for participating pathology practices to be compared with other practices that have similar characteristics. OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate variability in workload among different pathology practice settings and to determine practice characteristics that influence staffing levels. DESIGN: Among 228 group practices in the PathFocus database, group practice settings were analyzed. The practice characteristics that were highly correlated with staffing levels are presented. RESULTS: Activities that showed significant variation include surgical pathology (P = .003), cytopathology (P = .006), miscellaneous (P = .006), and professional development (P = .003). Group practices report up to 4% of hours devoted to clinical pathology consultation, on average, and from 20% to 25% to administration and management. There are strong positive associations with staffing levels for lower-complexity Current Procedural Terminology code volumes (P < .001) and higher-complexity Current Procedural Terminology code volumes (P = .006). CONCLUSION: The settings of pathology practices carry specific commitments of time that are different and not equally distributed among all practice settings and strongly influence staffing requirements.

Allied Health Personnel↗
PubMed2000

Evaluation and management services. A comparison of medical record documentation with actual billing in community family practice.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the concordance of family physicians' billing for evaluation and management services with medical record documentation. DESIGN: Multi-method, cross-sectional observation study. SETTING: Eighty-four family practices in northeast Ohio. PARTICIPANTS: Four thousand fifty-four outpatients visiting 138 family physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The degree of concordance between evaluation and management Current Procedural Terminology codes billed by physicians, with those codes assigned by trained research nurses using American Medical Association criteria to code medical records for the same visits. RESULTS: Discrepancies between the multifactorial nature of family practice outpatient visits and the Current Procedural Terminology coding criteria, which dictate overcoding for depth rather than breadth, made coding difficult (multiple-rater kappa statistic between research nurses = 0.36). Among 4137 outpatient visits with complete billing information, 57% of the Current Procedural Terminology codes generated by medical record review were concordant with the actual billing code assigned by physicians. Undercoding and overcoding occurred at a similar frequency (21% and 19%, respectively) and differed by more than 1 code in fewer than 4% of visits. Visits by new patients were more likely to be inaccurately coded than visits by established patients. CONCLUSIONS: Record documentation by community family physicians largely reflects the level of services billed using evaluation and management codes. Undercoding is as common as overcoding. Efforts from regulatory agencies should be redirected from penalizing physicians for overcoding to focusing on the development of coding criteria that reflect the multifactorial nature of outpatient primary care practice.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗
PubMed2001

Estimating the cost of developmental and behavioral screening of preschool children in general pediatric practice.

OBJECTIVE: Despite increased recognition of the importance of development and growth of young children, formal developmental and behavioral screening often is not included in general pediatric practice. Barriers to the provision of developmental and behavioral screening are considerable; among them are the need for specialized training and uncertain reimbursement. This article develops a model for estimating the cost of providing pediatric developmental and behavioral screening that can be scaled to reflect a pediatric practice's patient population and choice of screening offered. METHODS: The framework for our scaleable cost model was drawn from work done in estimating the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS). RBRVS provides estimates of the work effort involved in the provision of health care services for individual Current Procedural Terminology codes. The American Academy of Pediatrics has assigned descriptions of pediatric services, including developmental and behavioral screening, to the Current Procedural Terminology codes originally created for adult health care services. The cost of conducting a screen was calculated as a function of the time and staff required and was loaded for practice costs using the RBRVS valuation. The cost of the follow-up consultation was calculated as a function of the time and staff required and the number of relative value units assigned in the RBRVS scale. RESULTS: The practice cost of providing developmental and behavioral screening is driven primarily by the time and staff required to conduct and evaluate the screens. Administration costs are lowest for parent-administered developmental screens ($0 if no assistance is required) and highest ($67) for lengthy, pediatric provider-administered screens, such as the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale. The costs of 3 different groups of developmental and behavioral screening are estimated. The estimated per-member per-month cost per 0- to 3-year-old child ranges from $4 to >$7 in our 3 examples. CONCLUSIONS: Cost remains a significant barrier to greater provision of formal developmental and behavioral screening. Our scaleable cost model may be adjusted for a given practice to account for the overall level of developmental risk. The model also provides an estimate of the time and cost of providing new screening services. This model allows pediatric practices to select the mix of developmental screens most appropriate for their particular patient population at an acceptable cost.

Child↗
PubMed1998

Issues in the application of the resource-based relative value scale system to pediatrics: a subject review. American Academy of Pediatrics. Resource-Based Relative Value Scale Project Advisory Committee.

In today's rapidly changing health care environment, it is crucial to understand the genesis and concepts of the Medicare Resource-based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) physician fee schedule. Many third-party payers, including state Medicaid programs, Blue Cross-Blue Shield agencies, and managed care organizations are using variations of the Medicare RBRVS to determine physician reimbursement and capitation rates. Because the RBRVS fee schedule was originally created for Medicare only, pediatric-specific Current Procedural Terminology codes and pediatric practice expense issues were not included. The American Academy of Pediatrics agrees with the use of the Current Procedural Terminology codes and the RBRVS physician fee schedule and continues to work to rectify the inequities of the RBRVS system as they pertain to pediatrics.

Child↗
PubMed2004

Increasing the value of time reduces the lost economic opportunity of caring for surgeries of longer-than-average times.

UNLABELLED: Anesthesiology groups that provide care for surgical procedures of longer-than-average duration are economically disadvantaged by both increased staffing costs and reduced revenue. Under the current billing system, anesthesia time is valued the same regardless of the total case duration. In this study, we evaluated the effect on four academic anesthesiology departments of two hypothetical scenarios by changing the anesthesia care billing system to make more valuable either 1) all time units or 2) just second-hour and subsequent time units. From the four departments, case-specific data (anesthesia Current Procedural Terminology code and minutes of care) were collected for all anesthesia cases billed for 1 yr. Basic units were determined from the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) relative value guide. The average time for each case was defined as the average anesthesia time for that specific Current Procedural Terminology code, as published by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The actual total ASA units per hour (tASA/h) was determined by adding all the basic units and time units and dividing by hours of anesthesia care (minutes of anesthesia care divided by 60). We then calculated a hypothetical CMS tASA/h for each group by substituting the CMS average time for each anesthesia procedure time for the actual time reported by each group and using 15-min time units. For each group, the Actual (Act) tASA/h and CMS tASA/h were calculated for both options-changing the interval for all time units or only for second and subsequent hours. Intervals were 15, 12, 10, 7, 6, or 5 min. When changing all time units, Act tASA/h and CMS tASA/h were never equal for all groups. The two productivity measures became approximately equal if only time units after the first hour were changed to 6- to 7-min intervals. When changes were applied only to the Act tASA/h (with CMS tASA/h remaining at 15-min intervals), at the 12-min interval either option resulted in a similar or higher Act tASA/h than CMS tASA/h. Both options increase the value of time and help compensate for the lost economic opportunity of longer-than-average surgical durations. IMPLICATIONS: Longer-than-average surgical durations result in less potential revenue per hour under current billing methodology. This study quantifies the increase in billing productivity when the value of time is increased, when evaluating the billing productivity of four academic anesthesiology groups.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMed1998

Impact of MR imaging on nationwide health care costs and comparison with other imaging procedures.

OBJECTIVE: We wished to determine the extent to which MR imaging contributes to the overall costs of imaging in the United States and to compare MR imaging costs with other imaging techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All 23 current procedural terminology, version 4 (CPT-4) codes for MR imaging were extracted from the national 1993 Part B Medicare annual data reimbursement file. For each code, we calculated total Medicare physician reimbursements. Aggregate reimbursement for all MR imaging was compared with aggregate reimbursement for all 659 imaging-related current procedural terminology, version 4 codes and also with comparable figures for echocardiography and other categories of cardiovascular imaging. RESULTS: Within the 23 MR imaging codes, 1,449,911 examinations were performed on Medicare patients in 1993, for which physicians were reimbursed $370 million. Medicare reimbursement of physicians for all 659 imaging-related procedures was $5.3 billion. Thus, MR imaging accounted for only 7% of all imaging costs. By comparison, a group of just 10 imaging codes, which are primarily cardiovascular in nature, accounted for $1.67 billion, or 32% of the entire Part B costs for imaging. Reimbursements for echocardiography alone are more than twice those for MR imaging. CONCLUSION: From the national perspective, MR imaging does not appear to warrant its reputation as a costly procedure. The costs of echocardiography and other imaging related to the cardiovascular system are considerably higher.

Diagnostic Imaging↗