Conversation analysis: a practical resource in the health care setting.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The 'by the way' phenomenon, while commonly described in medical texts on the consultation, has not been systematically explored from an interactional perspective. Starting from a 'noticing' of an example of this phenomenon we studied a collection of over 200 recorded consultations in British general practice. New topics were introduced by both parties, but more commonly by patients, who used two sorts of device to change topic: an announcement, usually at the start of a consultation, but sometimes later, that they had multiple topics, which we have called a 'pre-announcement', and an apparently unexpected sudden change of topic, which we have called an 'in-situ announcement'. These phenomena occurred in about one third of our unselected collection of recorded consultations, drawn from nine doctors, and 27 surgery (office) sessions. We argue that this management of multiple topics is an important and normal part of the consultation, in contrast to its problematic status implied in some medical literature.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This paper uses the methodology and analytical findings of conversation analysis to investigate the notion that aphasic grammar may be understood at least partly in the context of the demands of turns at talk in conversation. An investigation of the conversation of an English-speaking person with aphasia reveals two distinct grammatical phenomena, and it is suggested that their use may be interactionally motivated by the need to take a relatively unproblematic turn at talk despite the constraints of non-fluent aphasia. The grammatical patterns that are revealed by this analysis look considerably different from those elicited by standard methods of data sampling. The possibility that interactional grammatical phenomena are not visible in the language data elicited by clinical assessments is raised. This question is addressed via an in-depth comparison of the same speaker's interactional and elicited grammar in a linked article. It is suggested that the tool of conversation analysis provides researchers with a new and fruitful approach to the study of grammatical abilities in aphasia.
PURPOSE: To determine if evidence of the persistence of a sense of self or personal identity could be found in people in the middle and late stages of Alzheimer's disease. The theme of diminishing self pervades both the popular and professional literature on Alzheimer's disease. DESIGN: Qualitative using conversational analysis. The purposive sample was 23 residents of two urban nursing homes in the southeastern United States who were in the middle and late stages of Alzheimer's disease. Their mean Mini-Mental State examination score was 10.65. Nineteen subjects were women, four were men in this 1993-1997 study. METHODS: Analysis of 45 conversations lasting 30 minutes with nursing home residents with a diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease. Use of the first person indexical and other evidence, such as awareness and reactions to the changes that had taken place, in support of and counter to the notion of persistence of self, were sought in conversational analysis. FINDINGS: Respondents used the first person indexical frequently, freely, and coherently. Evidence was also present that participants were aware of their cognitive changes. Many struggled to provide an explanation, but none mentioned Alzheimer's disease. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests the persistence of awareness of self into the middle and late stages of Alzheimer's disease. Failure to recognize the continuing awareness of self and the human experience of the person in the middle and late stages can lead to task-oriented care and low expectations for therapeutic interventions. The bafflement noted in respondents suggests that people should be told their diagnosis and offered an explanation of what this diagnosis means.
The genetic case-control association study of unrelated subjects is a leading method to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and SNP haplotypes that modulate the risk of complex diseases. Association studies often genotype several SNPs in a number of candidate genes; we propose a two-stage approach to address the inherent statistical multiple comparisons problem. In the first stage, each gene's association with disease is summarized by a single p-value that controls a familywise error rate. In the second stage, summary p-values are adjusted for multiplicity using a false discovery rate (FDR) controlling procedure. For the first stage, we consider marginal and joint tests of SNPs and haplotypes within genes, and we construct an omnibus test that combines SNP and haplotype analysis. Simulation studies show that when disease susceptibility is conferred by a SNP, and all common SNPs in a gene are genotyped, marginal analysis of SNPs using the Simes test has similar or higher power than marginal or joint haplotype analysis. Conversely, haplotype analysis can be more powerful when disease susceptibility is conferred by a haplotype. The omnibus test tracks the more powerful of the two approaches, which is generally unknown. Multiple testing balances the desire for statistical power against the implicit costs of false positive results, which up to now appear to be common in the literature.
BACKGROUND: The gap is widening between understanding the subtle ways patients and GPs manage their talk, and superficial discussion of the 'language barrier' among linguistic minority patients. All patients have to explain themselves, not just those for whom English is their first or main language. Patients' explanations reflect how they want the doctor to perceive them as a patient and as a person: they reveal patients' identities. Yet interpretations are not easy when patients' style of talking English is influenced by their first language and cultural background. OBJECTIVE: To explore in detail how patients with limited English and GPs jointly overcome misunderstandings in explanations. METHODS: Using discourse analysis and conversation analysis, we examine how GPs and their patients with limited English negotiate explanations and collaborate to manage, repair or prevent understanding problems. RESULTS: 31% of patients said English was not their first language. Misunderstandings arise owing to a range of linguistic and cultural factors, including stress and intonation patterns, vocabulary, the way a patient sequences their narrative, and patient and GP pursuing different agendas. CONCLUSION: When talk itself is the problem, patients' explanations can lead to misunderstandings, which GPs have to repair if they cannot prevent. Careful interpretation by skillful GPs can reveal patients' knowledge, experience and perspective.
In this article, the authors select two categories of dying patients, "troubled" and "credible," from two larger studies conducted in three palliative care settings. They explore how nurses construct dying patients' moral identities and how they use emotion talk to interpret patients' behavior. The authors carried out a microanalysis of talk-in-action using discourse analysis and conversation analysis. Strategies used for the construction of moral identities include the production of atrocity stories and emotional editing. The authors identify moments when emotions are made relevant in palliative care nurses' daily practices, which serve to smooth social interaction and give a voice to dying patients' words and actions. The dying trajectory, the deteriorating emotional body, and the sound mind are resources used in the characterization of the credible and troubled patient. The authors argue that emotion talk is significant because it reveals how nurses manage conflict and tension in talk-in-interaction.
Despite improvements in cancer management over the past 25 years, unrelieved symptoms continue to be reported. Little is known about how patients' problems and concerns are communicated to professionals during oncology treatment. This qualitative study investigates the process of communication between cancer patients and oncologists during consultations in outpatient clinics of a regional teaching hospital. Data were collected by nonparticipant observation and audiotaping consultations. Analyses were by qualitative content analysis and conversation analysis. An objectives, strategies and tactics model was applied to organize the findings. Seventy-four consultations between cancer patients and 15 doctors were observed and audiotaped. Pain talk is defined and identified as a substantial topic, occurring in 39 out of 74 consultations. Doctor-initiated questions are the predominant discourse feature and are prominent not only in initiating discussions but also in directing further talk (e.g. over three-quarters of doctor-initiated questions are in a closed form which focus narrowly on limited physical aspects of patients' pain). This limited information exchange is used alongside other communication tactics to identify the 'right kind' of pain that may benefit from cancer therapy and to truncate talk of problems perceived to be outside of this specialist remit. Although individualized, holistic care is the expressed philosophy of the clinic, our data show that doctors tightly control the agenda to focus narrowly on pain which was amenable to radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery or hormone manipulation. Inadequate exploration of patients' pain is likely to be detrimental to symptom control.
Many studies of communication employ interviewing techniques and conversation analysis, particularly in situations where one participant brings specialist resources. Interviews and recorded interactions are usually handled separately: ethnographic data are introduced once conversation analysis is complete, to validate findings or illustrate their wider significance. However, integrating interview data in conversation analysis has the potential to illuminate analysts' interpretations, and to enhance professionals' contributions from analysis through to dissemination. In this study, interviews highlighted a parameter between professionals who actively used communication to manipulate the consultation's course, engaging patients at particular points and in particular ways, and professionals whose consultation management was more 'clinical' and less dependent on interaction. The different ways professionals talked in interview were paralleled by differences identified from conversation analysis of consultations. For some, 'clinical' orientation was more prevalent in the organization of their consultations than 'active' manipulation of communication, and their management of the consultation more 'unilateral'. For others, communication played a more strategic and integral part in clinical practice, and their management of the consultation was more 'bilateral'. These contrasts in professionals' descriptions of their consultation management suggest that at least some features of a 'bilateral' approach are consciously employed and may be teachable.
This study employed a modification of the intonation unit analysis for conversational discourse developed by Mentis and Prutting. The percentage of total intonation units produced within separate ideational categories was calculated for groups of closed head-injured and normal control subjects as well as the examiner. No significant differences were found between subject groups or the examiner's performance within the two groups. However, significant differences were noted between the examiner's production of intonation units and the performances of both subject groups. Findings suggest the manner in which samples of conversation were elicited may have constrained the context, thereby masking potential differences between groups.
Investigation into the natural conversational discourse of patients with Dementia of the Alzheimer Type has received minimal attention, in part due to the inherent methodological problems. There are no satisfactory theoretical models of conversation; existing global checklists give minimal information on meaning relationships and analysis of conversation does not lend itself to group studies. The present study offered an initial example of how meaning relationships, expressed through topic shifting behavior, can be described in DAT and normal elderly subjects in natural conversational discourse. Categorization of topic units was done in an attempt to describe general phenomena, type of shift, reason for shift, and contextual relationship. Although very little differences were visually observed in the general categories, some convergence of data were observed in other topic shift categories. Discussion of the results in relation to a discourse processing model is presented.
Analysis of clear/turbid mottled (heterozygotic plaques) of Rhizobium meliloti temperate phage 16-3 indicates that the efficiency of repair at three sites (ti3, ti4, and ti5) in the C cistron is 2 to 20-fold less than that observed in E. coli phage lambda. In agreement with this conclusion, heterozygotic plaques were observed at similar frequency in crosses where point and small deletion mutants were combined, suggesting that in Rhizobium, DNA molecules with short single-stranded loops can escape from repair as efficiently as the simple mismatches.
The emotional impact of illness sustained by patients, their families, and friends is increasingly recognized as an important dimension of clinical evaluation and intervention. This study first attempted to extend a computerized technique of measuring the magnitude of mental events from a content analysis of speech initially designed for use on single verbal samples or verbal texts to the analysis of conversational interactions. The study then applied this method of extended measurement to conversations concerning seriously ill surgical patients. The authors' objective was to develop a graphic method that illustrates the neuropsychological interchanges occurring in these conversations. Speech samples were recorded during discussions among nurses, surgeons, intensivists, and family members involved in the care and treatment of seriously ill patients hospitalized in the surgical intensive care unit at Barnes-Jewish Hospitals associated with Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. These samples then were transcribed into computer-readable text files and divided into utterances: uninterrupted speech by a single individual. The utterances were assigned numeric scores by a computer program on each of 14 validated content analysis scales measuring various neuropsychological dimensions. The scores are presented graphically in chronological sequence to illustrate the emotional interactions in these conversations. The graphic representations depicting sequences of computerized content analysis-derived scores for the mental reactions of the speakers in such conversations provide insights into the psychodynamics occurring in such stressful situations.
This study describes a communication skills group programme for four carers of adults with aphasia that ran once a week for 6 consecutive weeks. The content of the group was based on an approach previously not described in the literature in any detail. Conversation analysis (CA) was used to guide individualized advice that was incorporated into the group by the use of written advice sheets. Intervention was motivated by the results of a newly developed assessment tool--the Conversation Analysis Profile for People with Aphasia (CAPPA)--and a quantitative and qualitative analysis of collaborative repair. The CAPPA utilizes the methodology of conversation analysis (CA) as a means of both characterizing and comparing the relationship between the carers' perception of the aphasia and what is occurring in natural conversation. During the group, accurate perceptions and strategies that minimized the disruption to the conversation were reinforced, while inaccurate perceptions and strategies that appeared to impede interaction were discouraged. The use of the CAPPA results and a quantitative/qualitative analysis of repair management to measure change pre- and post-group was explored. The post-intervention analyses examined three questions in particular: (1) did the carers demonstrate more accurate perceptions of their relatives' aphasia?; (2) did the carers report a decrease in the problem severity of the aphasia?; and (3) was there a change in the time taken to repair a trouble source and was this attributable to a change in the management of repair by the carer? The study was essentially an investigation of whether this type of approach was beneficial to the carers involved. The results suggested that focusing on individualized advice and targeting conversation management in the group setting was a useful way of providing advice to carers. Furthermore, the CAPPA and a quantitative/qualitative analysis of repair management seem to have the potential for motivating the individualized advice and measuring the effectiveness of an intervention.