Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Colorectal Cancer”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

The association of breast cancer and colorectal cancer in men. An analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program data.

There is a known increased risk for the co-occurrence of both breast cancer and colorectal cancer in the same women, presumably as a result of either shared reproductive hormonal or environmental risk factors. Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute, the authors investigated whether there is a similar relationship between breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and prostate cancer in men. The observed-expected ratio was not significantly elevated for either colorectal cancer after breast cancer or for breast cancer after colorectal cancer in men. There was an increased incidence of prostate cancer after colorectal cancer, but this relationship was not present in the opposite direction and is believed to result from detection bias. There was an increased incidence of breast and colorectal cancer in women. These results suggest that the observed breast and colorectal cancer relationship in women may be a result of shared reproductive hormonal factors.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Review article: the prevention of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality in the industrialized world. Survival remains poor because most cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage. It is a preventable disease as colorectal cancers usually develop slowly from an identifiable precursor lesion, the adenoma. The existing strategies for colorectal cancer prevention include dietary prevention, chemoprevention and endoscopic intervention. The exact relationship between diet, particularly fibre, and colorectal cancer remains unclear, with the most recent studies suggesting that dietary fibre may not decrease colorectal cancer risk as previously thought. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been shown to have a protective effect against colorectal cancer, but the adverse effect profile of the non COX-2 selective drugs, particularly the risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage, precludes their widespread use. There is increasing evidence that colorectal cancer incidence and mortality can be decreased from endoscopic polypectomy and early detection of cancer. Faecal occult blood testing in the general population ('average-risk') has been shown in randomized trials to decrease mortality from colorectal cancer by 15--33%. Long-term results of randomized trials of the effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy screening in the general population are awaited. Targeting high risk individuals may also be an effective and efficient way to decrease the colorectal cancer burden. As many as 15--30% of colorectal cases may be due to hereditary factors. Individuals with one or two direct relatives affected are at moderate risk for colorectal cancer (empirical lifetime mortality from colorectal cancer approximately 10%) and approximately 2--3% of cases arise in individuals harbouring highly penetrant autosomal dominant mutations, which puts them at high-risk for colorectal cancer. Surveillance colonoscopy is offered to individuals at moderate and high risk for colorectal cancer.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

Role of diet and NSAIDs in the chemoprevention of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is a major public health problem. It is also one of the most preventable cancers. Although the colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in whites have been declining over the past 2 decades, these statistics are rising in nearly all ethnic minority groups. The development of colorectal cancer is influenced by exogenous factors, such as dietary constituents and drugs. While reputable data on the chemopreventive effects of diet and drugs, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), in specific minority groups are limited, evidence suggests that dietary factors may affect colorectal carcinogenesis in various ethnic minority groups. Clearly, more studies are necessary to resolve these questions. Because the risk of colorectal cancer is increasing in minority patients, they cannot wait for the results of such studies. Therefore, until definitive data are available, it is prudent for physicians to recommend that all individuals be screened for colorectal cancer according to accepted guidelines and to educate them regarding healthful eating habits that will prevent the development of colorectal cancer. Physicians should be particularly vigilant in recommending these approaches to minority patients. Patients should be advised to consume a well-balanced, low-fat, high-fiber diet that is rich in fruits and vegetables.

Black or African American↗

[Medical treatment of colorectal cancer].

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the US in both sexes after lung cancer. In 1995 colorectal cancer became the third most common neoplasm after lung and prostate cancer in men and after lung and breast carcinomas in women. The etiologic factors related to this disease are unknown although environmental, genetic, dietary and familial factors have been implicated. From the standpoint of the treatment it is important to remark that a high percentage of patients with colorectal cancer are curable if the disease is diagnosed in early stages. Adjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and levamisole (lev) has shown an increase in the cure rate in stage III (Dukes'C) colon cancer patients. In rectal cancer patients adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy and radiation therapy increased the cure rate in stages II (Dukes' B2) and III patients. When colorectal cancer is disseminated (stage IV or Dukes'D), it is incurable in the majority of the patients. In fact, the only curative possibility in this group of patients is, when indicated, surgical resection of the metastatic focus. If resection is unfeasible, palliative treatment with 5-FU-based chemotherapy is the usual approach. Regardless of the advances made in treatment, almost 50% of the colorectal cancer patients still die due to progression of their disease. Better programs of primary and secondary prevention, new therapeutic modalities and better chemotherapeutic agents will be necessary to improve survival in colorectal cancer patients.

Colonic Neoplasms↗

Genetics of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. About 15 - 20% of all colorectal cancers are familial. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome. It is caused by mutations in mismatch repair genes, predominantly MSH2 and MLH1. Although hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer accounts for a minority of colorectal cancers, the mutations identified in these cases are important in our understanding of colorectal cancer pathogenesis. An increasing number of deletions in different exons of MSH2 and MLH1 genes is reported to result in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. This paper reviews the genetics behind these genes and molecular study of the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. This may help the medical professionals especially internists, gastroenterologists, and oncologists to update their knowledge in this field.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Screening, prevention and socioeconomic costs associated with the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC), the third most prevalent cancer worldwide, imposes a significant economic and humanistic burden on patients and society. One study conservatively estimated the annual expenditures for colorectal cancer to be approximately dollars US 5.3 billion in 2000, including both direct and indirect costs. However, other investigators estimated inpatient costs alone incurred in the US in 1994 to be around dollars US 5.14 billion. Therefore, the economic burden of colorectal cancer in the US could be projected to be somewhere in the range of dollars US 5.5-6.5 billion by considering that inpatient costs approximate 80% of total direct costs. No worldwide data have been published, but assuming that the US represents 25-40% of total expenditures in oncology, as seen for breast and lung cancers, a rough estimate for colorectal cancer would be in the range of dollars US 14-22 billion. Screening helps increase patient survival by diagnosing colorectal cancer early. The ideal method among the four tests most used (faecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy and double contrast barium enema) has not been identified. Economic studies of colorectal cancer screening are complex because of the many variables involved, as well as the fact that the outcomes must be followed for many years, and the lack of consensus on screening guidelines. Intuitively, modelling colorectal cancer is one way to overcome these hurdles; published modelling studies predict colorectal cancer screening programs to be within the threshold of dollars US 40000 per life-year saved. The faecal occult blood test appears to be the only clearly effective test, both from a clinical and an economic viewpoint. Important limitations are the invasiveness and inconvenience of the screening procedures, except faecal occult blood test. Patients' comfort and satisfaction are essential in improving compliance with screening recommendations, which appears to be low even in the US (35% of the general population aged over 40 years and 60% of the high-risk population), the country with the highest awareness and compliance in the world. Since colorectal cancer is generally a disease of the elderly, its economic burden is expected to grow in the near future, mainly due to population aging. Potential avenues to pursue in order to contain or reduce the economic burden of colorectal cancer would be the design and implementation of efficient screening programmes, the improvement of patient awareness and compliance with screening guidelines, the development of appropriate prevention programs (i.e. primary and secondary), and earlier diagnosis.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is the third most incident cancer in the United States and is second only to lung cancer as a cause of cancer-related mortality. Colorectal cancer develops through a multistep process characterized by histopathological precursor lesions and molecular genetic alterations. This sequential process of tumorigenesis provides opportunities for the development and testing of both primary and secondary prevention strategies. This review focuses on chemoprevention, which is defined as the use of natural or synthetic agents to reverse the process of carcinogenesis. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that chronic intake of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), principally aspirin, can reduce the incidence of colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. Evaluation of NSAIDs, including newer selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, in carcinogen-induced and genetically manipulated animal models of colorectal cancer demonstrates that these drugs are effective chemopreventive agents. In humans, the NSAID sulindac has been studied in familial adenomatous polyposis patients and was found to regress colorectal adenomas in a placebo-controlled trial. More recently, the selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor Celebrex was also shown to be effective in familial adenomatous polyposis and was approved by the Food and Drug Administration as a adjuct to usual care in these patients. NSAIDs, as well as other chemopreventive agents, are currently being studied in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer, including those with sporadic adenomas. The outcome of these studies has the potential to impact patient management practices. However, chemopreventive agents cannot be recommeded at present for average-risk individuals or for those with sporadic colorectal neoplasia. In addition to demonstrating efficacy, chemopreventive agents must be safe and well tolerated for chronic administration and should be relatively cost-effective. Although still in its infancy, the field of chemoprevention is an exciting and rapidly advancing area of investigation. Chemopreventive strategies, if effective, offer the promise of producing a paradigm shift in our current approach to colorectal cancer.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

Meta-analysis of randomized trials testing the biochemical modulation of fluorouracil by methotrexate in metastatic colorectal cancer. Advanced Colorectal Cancer Meta-Analysis Project.

PURPOSE: Even though fluorouracil (5FU) remains the standard treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, almost 90% of patients treated with 5FU alone do not achieve an objective response to chemotherapy. Biochemical modulation of 5FU by methotrexate (MTX) is an attempt to increase the sensitivity of tumor cells to 5FU. However, despite the inclusion of several hundreds of patients in randomized clinical trials, no definitive evidence is available on the clinical benefit of 5FU/MTX over 5FU alone. A meta-analysis was performed to assess this benefit objectively and quantitatively for tumor response rate and overall survival. DESIGN: The meta-analysis was based on individual data of 1,178 patients included in eight randomized clinical trials comparing 5FU alone with 5FU/MTX. Patient data were provided by all principal investigators. The analyses were performed by an independent secretariat, and then discussed with all collaborators. RESULTS: Tumor response rate was 10% for patients allocated to 5FU alone (complete response [CR] rate, 2%; partial response [PR] rate, 8%) compared with 19% for patients allocated to 5FU/MTX (CR rate, 3%; PR rate, 16%). This difference was highly significant, with an overall response odds ratio (OR) of 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.70) (P < .0001). Median overall survival times were 9.1 months and 10.7 months in the 5FU-alone and 5FU/MTX groups, respectively. This difference was also statistically significant, with an overall survival OR of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.98) (P = .024). Logistic regression model and Cox regression model showed that performance status and randomized treatment were the only two significant predictors of tumor response and survival. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the modulation of 5FU by MTX doubles the response rate to 5FU, and yields a small improvement in survival.

Aged↗

Efficacy of oxaliplatin in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death. The mainstay of chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients for the past 40 years has been fluorouracil (5-FU). Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) is a novel platinum compound with promising activity in colorectal cancer. As a single agent, oxaliplatin has produced response rates of 12% to 24% in patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer, and 10% to 11% in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced colorectal cancer. In phase II trials, oxaliplatin combined with 5-FU, with or without leucovorin, was associated with response rates of 60% and higher when used as front-line therapy, and when used in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced colorectal cancer, response rates ranged from 25% to 50%. In the front-line setting, two randomized trials of 5-FU and leucovorin, with or without oxaliplatin, demonstrated that the addition of oxaliplatin significantly increases response rate and time to tumor progression, but not survival, over 5-FU plus leucovorin alone. The reasons for this discrepancy are unclear, and several possibilities are being considered. Additional phase III trials are underway to clarify the contribution of oxaliplatin in the treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Open, randomized, multicenter trial of raltitrexed versus fluorouracil plus high-dose leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Tomudex Colorectal Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: To compare raltitrexed (Tomudex; Zeneca Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Macclesfield, United Kingdom) a direct, specific thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitor with fluorouracil (5-FU) plus high-dose leucovorin (LV) as first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 495 patients were randomized to raltitrexed (3 mg/m2) once every 3 weeks or 5-FU (400 mg/m2) plus LV (200 mg/m2) daily for 5 days every 4 weeks. RESULTS: The randomized groups were well balanced demographically. With a minimum 17-month follow-up, median survival was comparable between groups (10.9 months raltitrexed v 12.3 months 5-FU/LV; hazards ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.42; P=.197), although time to progression was statistically significantly shorter in the raltitrexed group. Overall objective responses were comparable (19% raltitrexed v 18% 5-FU/LV), with more than 50% of patients in each group having stable disease. Significantly less World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 and 4 stomatitis (2% v 16%, P < .001) and a reduced incidence of leukopenia (6% v 13%) and diarrhea (10% v 19%) occurred in the raltitrexed group (particularly at cycle 1 ). This resulted in fewer dose reductions at cycle 2 (4% raltitrexed v 28% 5-FU/LV) and early quality-of-life (QoL) benefits for raltitrexed patients. Reversible, clinically insignificant increases in transaminases were reported in 13% of raltitrexed patients. Palliative benefits of weight gain, improved performance status, and reduced disease-related symptoms were evident in both groups. CONCLUSION: Raltitrexed is confirmed as an effective option in the first-line palliative management of ACC, with comparable efficacy to and tolerability advantages (in terms of reduced incidence of stomatitis, diarrhea, and leukopenia) over 5-FU/LV. Raltitrexed has the added convenience of an every 3 weeks dosing schedule.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Molecular biology of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in Western populations. This cancer develops as a result of the pathologic transformation of normal colonic epithelium to an adenomatous polyp and ultimately an invasive cancer. The multistep progression requires years and possibly decades and is accompanied by a number of recently characterized genetic alterations. Mutations in two classes of genes, tumor-suppressor genes and proto-oncogenes, are thought to impart a proliferative advantage to cells and contribute to development of the malignant phenotype. Inactivating mutations of both copies (alleles) of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene--a tumor-suppressor gene on chromosome 5q--mark one of the earliest events in colorectal carcinogenesis. Germline mutation of the APC gene and subsequent somatic mutation of the second APC allele cause the inherited familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome. This syndrome is characterized by the presence of hundreds to thousands of colonic adenomatous polyps. If these polyps are left untreated, colorectal cancer develops. Mutation leading to dysregulation of the K-ras protooncogene is also thought to be an early event in colon cancer formation. Conversely, loss of heterozygosity on the long arm of chromosome 18 (18q) occurs later in the sequence of development from adenoma to carcinoma, and this mutation may predict poor prognosis. Loss of the 18q region is thought to contribute to inactivation of the DCC tumor-suppressor gene. More recent evidence suggests that other tumor-suppressor genes--DPC4 and MADR2 of the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) pathway--also may be inactivated by allelic loss on chromosome 18q. In addition, mutation of the tumor-suppressor gene p53 on chromosome 17p appears to be a late phenomenon in colorectal carcinogenesis. This mutation may allow the growing tumor with multiple genetic alterations to evade cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Neoplastic progression is probably accompanied by additional, undiscovered genetic events, which are indicated by allelic loss on chromosomes 1q, 4p, 6p, 8p, 9q, and 22q in 25% to 50% of colorectal cancers. Recently, a third class of genes, DNA repair genes, has been implicated in tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer. Study findings suggest that DNA mismatch repair deficiency, due to germline mutation of the hMSH2, hMLH1, hPMS1, or hPMS2 genes, contributes to development of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. The majority of tumors in patients with this disease and 10% to 15% of sporadic colon cancers display microsatellite instability, also know as the replication error positive (RER+) phenotype. This molecular marker of DNA mismatch repair deficiency may predict improved patient survival. Mismatch repair deficiency is thought to lead to mutation and inactivation of the genes for type II TGF-beta receptor and insulin-like growth-factor II receptor. Individuals from families at high risk for colorectal cancer (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer or familial adenomatous polyposis) should be offered genetic counseling, predictive molecular testing, and when indicated, endoscopic surveillance at appropriate intervals. Recent studies have examined colorectal carcinogenesis in the light of other genetic processes. Telomerase activity is present in almost all cancers, including colorectal cancer, but rarely in benign lesions such as adenomatous polyps or normal tissues. Furthermore, genetic alterations that allow transformed colorectal epithelial cells to escape cell cycle arrest or apoptosis also have been recognized. In addition, hypomethylation or hypermethylation of DNA sequences may alter gene expression without nucleic acid mutation.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗

Current strategies in previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Approximately 30% to 40% of patients with colorectal cancer have locoregionally advanced or metastatic disease on presentation and cannot be cured with surgical therapy. After many years without significant change, systemic therapy for colorectal cancer is rapidly evolving. The past decade has seen the introduction of new chemotherapeutic agents such as irinotecan (Camptosar), oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) and the oral 5-FU prodrug capecitabine (Xeloda). Combination studies of these new agents with the standard 5-FU/leucovorin have extended median survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer for up to 21 months. In addition, targeted agents with activity in colorectal cancer have emerged and are promising. This article reviews the current treatment recommendations for patients who present with advanced colorectal cancer. Survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer is on a positive trajectory. The hope that some patients with advanced disease will be long-term survivors (even without surgery) appears to be within the range of possibility.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Primary and secondary prevention in colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is an important public health problem: there are nearly one million cases of colorectal cancer diagnosed worldwide each year and half a million deaths. The geographic distribution of colorectal cancer follows the division between westernized versus developing countries, The highest rates are in North America, Australia and Europe. Rates in Africa and Asia are low, but are increasing in countries adopting western-style dietary habits. Given that the majority of cancers occur in older people, and with the ageing of the population in mind, this observation adds impetus to investigating prevention strategies to avoid some of this increase. High vegetable and fruit consumption has been associated with decreased risk of colorectal cancer in numerous observational studies, while high fibre intake seems to have a similar effect. Promising data have been obtained for aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and dietary calcium. A physically active lifestyle and maintenance of normal body weight are behavioural tools for prevention of colorectal cancer. Faecal occult blood testing has been shown to be effective in the prevention of about 20% of deaths from colorectal cancer, but few population-based screening programs have been initiated. Sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy are potentially effective screening modalities; however, no randomized trial data have yet been reported. Overall, primary and secondary prevention, chemoprevention and screening research and implementation of these prevention strategies are priorities for reduction of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.

Body Weight↗

Family history, metabolic gene polymorphism, diet and risk of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is thought to be largely due to dietary factors. There is evidence of familial aggregation of colorectal cancer suggesting that genetic susceptibility may be important in the aetiology of the disease. Only limited data are available comparing risk factors for colorectal cancer with and without a family history. There are arguments suggesting that individuals with a first-degree relative with colorectal cancer are at a greater risk from a diet high in energy than individuals without such a family history. Failure to take into account both genetic and environmental factors can lead to bias in the estimation of disease risk. Genetic polymorphisms interact with dietary intake. A number of associations have been observed between specific genetic polymorphisms and colorectal cancer. But there are inconsistencies between studies, because of methodological limitations in initial studies. Different effects of dietary factors on colorectal cancer risk among individuals with different genotypes or of different effects of a genotype on colorectal cancer risk among individuals with different exposures need to be addressed in future works.

Acetylation↗

Mutations in APC, Kirsten-ras, and p53--alternative genetic pathways to colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is one of the most significant causes of cancer death. A genetic model for colorectal cancer has been proposed in which the sequential accumulation of mutations in specific genes, including adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), Kirsten-ras (K-ras), and p53, drives the transition from healthy colonic epithelia through increasingly dysplastic adenoma to colorectal cancer. We have characterized tumor mutation spectra in a large cohort of colorectal cancer patients. In marked contrast to the predictions of the sequential model of mutation accumulation, only 6.6% of tumors were found to contain mutations in APC, K-ras, and p53, with 38.7% of tumors containing mutations in only one of these genes. The most common combination of mutations was p53 and APC (27.1%), whereas mutations in both p53 and K-ras were extremely rare. Statistical analysis (two-sided Fisher's exact test) confirmed that mutations in K-ras and p53 co-occurred less frequently than expected by chance (P < 0.01, Fisher's exact test). This finding suggests that these mutations lie on alternate pathways of colorectal tumor development. The heterogeneous pattern of tumor mutations in our patient cohort suggests that multiple alternative genetic pathways to colorectal cancer exist and that the widely accepted genetic model of cancer development is not representative of the majority of colorectal tumors.

Aged↗

CD103+ intraepithelial lymphocytes--a unique population in microsatellite unstable sporadic colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability (MSI) typically show increased numbers of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) in comparison to microsatellite stable (MSS) cancers. The aim of this study was to determine the phenotype of this unique lymphocyte population in MSI and MSS colorectal cancers. Twenty-four individuals with sporadic colorectal cancer (17 MSI, 7 MSS) were included in this study. Intraepithelial and stromal lymphocytes were detected using immunohistochemistry with anti-CD8 and anti-CD103 antibodies, and two observers independently quantified the numbers of lymphocytes. CD103+ (alpha E beta 7+) IELs detected within tumour tissue co-expressed CD8+ while the stromal lymphocytes were phenotypically heterogeneous, with respect to CD8+ and CD103+ expression. MSI colorectal cancers harboured increased numbers of CD8+ CD103+ IELs, as well as CD8+ CD103- and CD8+ CD103+ stromal lymphocytes, when compared with MSS colorectal cancers. CD103+ IELs were found at 27-fold greater numbers in the tumour epithelium than in normal epithelium from the same patient (P = 0.001, Wilcoxon matched pairs test). From our findings, we have proposed a mechanism for the homing of these alpha E beta 7+ lymphocytes to tumour tissue in MSI and MSS colorectal cancers.

Aged↗

Mediators of PGE2 synthesis and signalling downstream of COX-2 represent potential targets for the prevention/treatment of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is a major cause of mortality and whilst up to 80% of sporadic colorectal tumours are considered preventable, trends toward increasing obesity suggest the potential for a further increase in its worldwide incidence. Novel methods of colorectal cancer prevention and therapy are therefore of considerable importance. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are chemopreventive against colorectal cancer, mainly through their inhibitory effects on the cyclooxygenase isoform COX-2. COX enzymes represent the committed step in prostaglandin biosynthesis and it is predominantly increased COX-2-mediated prostaglandin-E2 (PGE2) production that has a strong association with colorectal neoplasia, by promoting cell survival, cell growth, migration, invasion and angiogenesis. COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition by traditional NSAIDs (for example, aspirin) although chemopreventive have some side effects due to the role of COX-1 in maintaining the integrity of the gastric mucosa. Interestingly, the use of COX-2 selective NSAIDs has also shown promise in the prevention/treatment of colorectal cancer while having a reduced impact on the gastric mucosa. However, the prolonged use of high dose COX-2 selective inhibitors is associated with a risk of cardiovascular side effects. Whilst COX-2 inhibitors may still represent viable adjuvants to current colorectal cancer therapy, there is an urgent need to further our understanding of the downstream mechanisms by which PGE2 promotes tumorigenesis and hence identify safer, more effective strategies for the prevention of colorectal cancer. In particular, PGE2 synthases and E-prostanoid receptors (EP1-4) have recently attracted considerable interest in this area. It is hoped that at the appropriate stage, selective (and possibly combinatorial) inhibition of the synthesis and signalling of those prostaglandins most highly associated with colorectal tumorigenesis, such as PGE2, may have advantages over COX-2 selective inhibition and therefore represent more suitable targets for long-term chemoprevention. Furthermore, as COX-2 is found to be overexpressed in cancers such as breast, gastric, lung and pancreatic, these investigations may also have broad implications for the prevention/treatment of a number of other malignancies.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

The molecular genetics of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among types of cancer in the United States. Significant progress has been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms that lead to it. Much knowledge was obtained through study of genetic changes that occur in individuals with a familial predisposition to colorectal cancer, including familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndromes. The gene with mutations that result in FAP has been identified as adenomatous polyposis coli (APC). Similarly, mutations in several genes that normally function in DNA mismatch repair result in HNPCC. Colorectal cancer is the result of accumulated mutations in several additional oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, and this information leads to the formulation of a genetic model for the disease. Recent studies have also identified a relatively prevalent polymorphism in the APC gene in Ashkenazi Jews that is associated with an increased risk for colorectal cancer. These studies present a paradigm based on the APC mutation (APC I1307K) for the screening of cancer susceptibility genes in the population at large. Currently available techniques for genetic testing of colorectal cancer are also discussed in this review, along with their ethical implications.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗