Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Colonoscopes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Is colonoscopic surveillance reducing colorectal cancer mortality in ulcerative colitis? A population based case control study.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopic surveillance is a standard procedure in many patients with long standing, extensive ulcerative colitis (UC), in order to avoid death from colorectal cancer. No conclusive proof of its benefits has been presented however. AIMS: To evaluate the association between colonoscopic surveillance and colorectal cancer mortality in patients with UC. PATIENTS: A population based, nested case control study comprising 142 patients with a definite UC diagnosis, derived from a study population of 4664 patients with UC, was conducted. METHODS: Colonoscopic surveillance in all patients with UC who had died from colorectal cancer after 1975 was compared with that in controls matched for age, sex, extent, and duration of the disease. Information on colonoscopic surveillance was obtained from the medical records. RESULTS: Two of 40 patients with UC and 18 of 102 controls had undergone at least one surveillance colonoscopy (relative risk (RR) 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 1.31). Twelve controls but only one patient with UC had undergone two or more surveillance colonoscopies (RR 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.03 to 1.74), indicating a protective dose response relation. CONCLUSION: Colonoscopic surveillance may be associated with a decreased risk of death from colorectal cancer in patients with long standing UC.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Colonoscopic surveillance after polypectomy: considerations of cost effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost effectiveness of the current recommendation that persons who have had an adenomatous colon polyp removed have periodic colonoscopic surveillance at fixed and regular intervals. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis using data from the medical literature in a simulation model to estimate the costs of and the risk for perforation associated with periodic colonoscopic surveillance for a 50-year-old man followed for 30 years. MAIN RESULTS: A program of colonoscopy every 3 years would incur cumulatively a 1.4% risk for colon perforation, a 0.11% risk for perforation-related death, and direct physician costs of $2071 for colonoscopy (discounted at 5%). If a 50-year-old man's cumulative remaining risk for death from cancer is 2.5% after the removal of a single small adenoma and if effectiveness of colonoscopic surveillance every 3 years is 100%, then one death from cancer could be prevented by doing 283 colonoscopies, incurring 0.6 perforations, 0.04 perforation-related deaths, and direct physician costs of $82,000. If surveillance were 50% effective and the cumulative remaining risk for death from cancer were 1.25%--a plausible scenario--1131 colonoscopies would be required to prevent one death from cancer, incurring 2.3 perforations, 0.17 perforation-related deaths, and physician costs of $331,000. CONCLUSIONS: The cost effectiveness of colonoscopic surveillance is very sensitive to estimates of the cumulative remaining risk for death from cancer after polypectomy as well as to surveillance efficacy. For persons whose remaining risk for death from cancer may be low, such as persons with a single small adenoma, recommendations for colonoscopic surveillance at fixed and regular intervals may be excessively costly.

Aged↗
PubMed1982

Technique of colonoscopic polypectomy.

Most colonic polyps can be removed colonoscopically from all reaches of the colon, provided that one is experienced with endoscopic morphology and snare electrosurgical techniques. Virtually all pedunculated polyps and the majority of benign sessile polyps can be excised colonoscopically, certain of the larger benign sessile polyps and all malignant sessile lesions still require partial colectomy, if the patient's general condition will permit. Preparation for colonoscopic polypectomy includes thorough mental as well as physical preparation of the patient and the availability of properly functioning endoscopic and snare-cautery equipment. An experienced colonoscopist is one who is not only prepared for the diagnostic possibilities but experienced enough to manage certain of the larger polyps so that laparotomy is limited to those few lesions that are not amenable to safe and total colonoscopic polypectomy.

Colonic Neoplasms↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Establishing the shelf life of flexible colonoscopes.

This study was designed to establish a shelf life for processed (peracetic acid) flexible colonoscopes and to demonstrate the adequacy of manual cleaning procedures. The study challenges current practice in Australia where endoscopes are routinely reprocessed prior to use if the endoscope has been sitting at least overnight. The design was a simulated study in the clinical environment and involved artificial contamination of a colonoscope, cleaning validation, and a time series analysis after processing with peracetic acid in a Steris System 1 processor and drying with 100% isopropyl alcohol. The main outcome measure was the presence of bacteria in the internal channels of the colonoscope after cleaning and at 24 and 168 hours after processing with peracetic acid. The findings suggest that colonoscopes may be left for up to 1 week before needing to be reprocessed before use, provided all channels are thoroughly reprocessed and dried, resulting in cost savings and reduced wear and tear on the instruments. The findings also demonstrate the impact of providing feedback to staff on a regular basis about the efficacy of their cleaning techniques.

Antisepsis↗
PubMed1996

More effective endoscopic resection with a two-channel colonoscope for carcinoid tumors of the rectum.

PURPOSE: Complete resection of small carcinoid tumors of the rectum is difficult with conventional polypectomy, because these tumors are most often located in the submucosal layer of the rectal wall. To completely remove these tumors, we used a two-channel videocolonoscope with which both a grasping forceps and a polypectomy snare could be used simultaneously. We evaluated its clinical usefulness in comparison with one-channel colonoscopic polypectomy. METHODS: At Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, seven carcinoid tumors in seven patients were removed with a one-channel videocolonoscope from 1985 to 1992. In 1993 and 1994, ten tumors in nine patients were removed with a two-channel colonoscope. RESULTS: The rate of complete removal of carcinoid tumors with a two-channel videocolonoscope (9 of 10 tumors, 90 percent) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than with a one-channel videocolonoscope (2 of 7 tumors, 29 percent). No complications occurred during or after endoscopic resection with a two-channel colonoscope. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic resection with a two-channel colonoscope is a useful and safe method for resection of small carcinoid tumors of the rectum.

Carcinoid Tumor↗
PubMed1999

Laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy: technique and preliminary experience.

BACKGROUND: The majority of colonic polyps found at endoscopy are suitable for diathermy snare excision via colonoscope. Due to location or size, some are deemed unsafe to treat in this manner and therefore require colectomy. This study describes the technique and early results of a laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy technique that can be used to manage such polyps and thereby avoid laparotomy and colectomy. METHODS: Colonoscopy with simultaneous laparoscopy was utilized to locate the site of the polyp. The colon was mobilized, if required, and the polyp resected by electrosurgical snare via the colonoscope while the serosal aspect of the colon was monitored laparoscopically. RESULTS: The technique has been tried successfully in six patients. Three polyps were in the cecum and three were within the left colon. The size of the polyps ranged from 3 to 7 cm. All polyps were benign on histological examination. The patients were discharged on the day following the procedure. There were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of laparoscopy with colonoscopic resection of a select group of large polyps represents a safe alternative to colonic resection.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Colonoscopic decompression for acute pseudoobstruction of the colon (Ogilvie's syndrome). Report of 22 cases and review of the literature.

This report has described a series of 22 patients who underwent colonoscopic decompression for acute pseudoobstruction of the colon and summarizes those cases previously reported in the literature. Twenty of the 22 patients (91 percent) were successfully treated by decompression initially. Fifteen patients (68 percent) were cured with the initial procedure, and 4 patients (18 percent) experienced recurrence. Overall, in 17 patients (77 percent), the pseudoobstruction resolved completely with colonoscopic decompression. Three patients (14 percent) underwent operation because of cecal dilatation refractory to colonoscopic decompression, and in one patient (4.5 percent), the colonic dilatation resolved spontaneously after a failed colonoscopy. Complications resulted in the death of one patient (4.5 percent). Our data are similar to those in the literature and indicate that colonoscopic decompression is a safe and efficacious first line of treatment for acute pseudoobstruction of the colon.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates.

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies have documented differences in detection rates of colorectal cancers and adenomas between experienced colonoscopists, the basis of which is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether colonoscopic withdrawal technique varies between 2 colonoscopists with known differences in adenoma detection rates. METHODS: Ten consecutive colonoscopic withdrawals by each of the 2 colonoscopists were videotaped and then assessed according to specific criteria by 4 experts blinded to who had performed the colonoscopies. RESULTS: Each of the 4 experts scored the colonoscopist with the lower miss rate significantly higher (p < 0.001) for each of 4 quality criteria: (1) examining the proximal sides of flexures, folds and valves, (2) cleaning and suctioning, (3) adequacy of distention, and (4) adequacy of time spent viewing. CONCLUSION: Higher quality colonoscopic withdrawal technique as determined by expert observers was associated with a colonoscopist with a previously documented lower miss rate for adenomas. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique should be subjected to further study and standards for withdrawal technique should be developed.

Adenoma↗
PubMed2001

Colonoscopic manifestations of primary colorectal lymphoma.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Little is known about the colonoscopic manifestation of colorectal lymphoma. This article describes the use of colonoscopy for diagnosis of primary colorectal lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed colonoscopic findings in 13 retrospectively collected cases of primary colorectal lymphoma diagnosed between 1990 and 1999 at our hospital. RESULTS: The primary colorectal tymphomas were distinguished into three colonoscopic types: a) the mucosal type, which included six lymphomas (46%), which were classified into two subtypes, erosive (two lymphomas) and ulcerative (four tymphomas); b) the polypoid type, which included three tymphomas (23%); and c) the massive type, which included four (31%). The proportion of patients with T-cell lineage lymphoma (5 of 12, 42%) was higher than in previous studies. Three cases were diagnosed as enteropathy-associated T-cell (EAT)-like lymphoma: one presenting with multicentric ulcerations, one as a massive type and another as a polypoid type. Of those with B-cell lineage lymphoma (7 of 12, 58%), three presented as massive type, two as polypoid type and two as erosive subtype. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the analysis of colonoscopic records, we have proposed three main types of primary colorectal lymphoma. An unusually high proportion of T-cell lineage lymphomas was noted, but as the number of cases was low, further study is still needed for confirmation.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Fifteen years later: colonoscopic retroflexion revisited.

OBJECTIVE: Retroflex views of the rectal vault are included in the teaching of colonoscopic technique but are not pervasive in clinical practice. The utility of adding a retroflex maneuver at the end of colonoscopy has yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the additional benefit of a retroflex view of the rectal vault at the completion of colonoscopic examination. METHODS: A prospective study of consecutive colonoscopies performed by a single physician was conducted. The rectal vault was first visually inspected upon withdrawal of the colonoscope. The endoscope was then readvanced into the rectum and retroflexed to view the vault. Endoscopic findings on both views were recorded along with demographic patient information. The six groups of findings sought on the two views were: retained stool, abnormal hemorrhoids, erosions/ulcerations, polyps, masses, and normal examinations. A determination on whether retroflex views influenced patient diagnosis was recorded by the endoscopist. RESULTS: There were 453 patients enrolled: 182 (40.2%) male and 271 (59.8%) female, consisting of 216 African-Americans, 232 Caucasians, and five Asians. The retroflex maneuver was performed successfully in 445 of 453 patients. In all but nine cases, the retroflex view did not produce additional information. The nine findings included three inflammatory pseudopolyps, five hyperplastic polyps, and one case of erosions/ulcerations. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of cases, retroflexing the endoscope does not produce additional information compared with the thorough examination in straight view. The retroflex view may be of benefit if there is suspicion of pathology upon insertion or withdrawal of the colonoscope.

Colonoscopy↗
PubMed1972

Examination of the whole colon with the fibreoptic colonoscope.

During examination of the intact colon with the Olympus CF LB 185-cm colonoscope it has proved possible to reach the caecum or terminal ileum in 47 out of 50 cases (94%). Careful bowel preparation, moderately heavy sedation, and some x-ray screening are necessary for the procedure, but it was well tolerated by all patients and there was no morbidity. The average time taken to the caecum was 40 minutes and the average time to completion of examination 90 minutes. The long colonoscope was as convenient to use as the fibresigmoidoscope in examinations confined to the sigmoid colon or in patients with a colostomy, ileostomy, or ileorectal anastomosis. Of the two, the long colonoscope is the instrument of choice for clinical use.Because of the expense, time, and equipment involved colonoscopy appears to be best offered as a specialist service after x-ray studies. There is alo a limited place for colonoscopy during abdominal surgery, when it is technically an easier procedure. In this series 10 patients were saved exploratory laparotomy by examination with the colonocope, and we also diagnosed four resectable carcinomas not seen on double-contrast barium-enema studies. The colonoscope provides an effective new means of diagnosis of lesions throughout the colon.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Does flexible small-diameter colonoscope reduce insertion pain during colonoscopy?

AIM:It is well known that colonoscopy can be difficult due to abdominal pain induced during colonoscope insertion, if sedative agents are not given. Recently, an extra-flexible, small-diameter colonoscope (CF-SV, Olympus Inc.Japan) was developed in order to improve safety and comfort. The aim of this study was to access the usefulness of the CF-SV.METHODS:One hundred patients undergoing sigmoidoscopy were recruited and colonoscopy was performed by one experienced colonoscopist. First, a routine type colonoscope (CF-230I) was inserted into the colon without sedation. When the patient complained of abdominal pain (even if mild), the scope was not advanced further and was withdrawn after the anatomic location of its tip was determined fluoroscopically. Then, the CF-SV was inserted until it reached the cecun or the site where abdominal pain occurred. Previous abdominal surgery and abdominal disease were considered as unfavorable factors (UF) and the relationship between abdominal pain and UF, age and gender were investigated.Furthermore, the colonic insertion pressures in 36 patients with abdominal pain were measured with a force gauge.RESULTS:Thirty-four cases (34%) felt no pain with the CF-230I and successful pancolon-oscopies to the cecum were performed. Sixty-six cases (66%) complained of abdominal pain. The procedure was painless for 47% of men and 24% of women, respectively. The CF-230I scope failed to reach the sigmoid-descending colon junctions in 59 (89.4%) of the 66 patients complaining of abdominal pain. However, CF-SV reached proximal area in 94.9% of those who failed with CF-230I. The median pressure for pain-inducing was 700g/cm(2).CONCLUSION:Unsedated patients with UF were prone to complain of pain when the standard type CF-230I scope was used. The newly developed extra-flexible CF-SV is useful for the aged and for those with UF or being prone to suffer from abdominal pain. Sedative agents may be unnecessary if this new type of colonoscope is used.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1997

The role of mucosal biopsy in the diagnosis of chronic diarrhea: value of multiple biopsies when colonoscopic finding is normal or nonspecific.

OBJECTIVES: There are controversies about taking routine mucosal biopsy when the gross colonoscopic finding is normal. This study was conducted to determine the frequency of clinically important histological abnormalities, prospectively, in chronic diarrhea patients with grossly normal or nonspecific colonoscopic findings. METHODS: One hundred and eighteen patients suffering from nonbloody diarrhea with average frequency of more than two times a day for more than 4 weeks were included. Multiple biopsies (cecum, ascending colon, mid-transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon and rectum) were taken during colonoscopic examinations and each biopsy specimen was reviewed by one pathologist after H&E and Masson-trichrome staining. RESULTS: Clinically significant abnormalities (2 collagenous colitis, 1 lymphocytic colitis, 1 eosinophilic enterocolitis, 1 ulcerative colitis and 4 melanosis coli) were observed in 9 patients (7.6%). Sixteen cases (13.6%) of borderline histological abnormalities were observed (8 cases of possible collagenous colitis and 8 cases showing some features of lymphocytic colitis). Ninety two cases (78.8%) showed nonspecific inflammation only. CONCLUSION: Clinically important histological lesions can exist in significant percentage in spite of normal or nonspecific colonoscopic findings, which can justify routine mucosal biopsy in the evaluation of chronic diarrhea patients. The clinical significance of borderline histological abnormalities needs to be determined by careful follow-up studies.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Colonic tuberculosis: colonoscopic appearance and clinico-pathologic analysis.

BACKGROUND: There has been a resurgence of interest in intestinal tuberculosis because of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic sweeping our country. Role of colonoscopy and colonoscopy directed histology for diagnosing the disease have been emphasised since last few years. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To know the colonoscopic features in patients with intestinal tuberculosis and to study the clinicopathological findings in the same. METHODS: We studied twenty-one patients with intestinal tuberculosis referred to us between 1993-1997. Colonoscopy was done in all patients and biopsy specimens were collected from the site of lesion during the procedure. RESULTS: Ileocaecal disease was found in 9 patients, ileocaecal with contiguous ascending colon involvement in eight and segmental colonic tuberculosis in four cases. The colonoscopic findings included nodules in seven patients, nodules with ulcerations in three, ulcerations alone in seven, nodules with strictures in three and polypoidal mass in one patient. Eight cases revealed granuloma on histopathology. CONCLUSIONS: Though bacteriological and histological assessment of tissue is essential to differentiate tuberculosis from other disorders, we stress the importance of colonoscopic appearances in diagnosing tuberculosis. We also recommend antituberculous chemotherapy in patients with high clinical suspicion of tuberculosis on the basis of colonoscopic appearance alone after ruling other causes on histopathological examination.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed1989

Colonoscopic extraction of foreign bodies from above the rectum.

There has been a considerable amount of experience with removal of rectal foreign bodies inserted transanally. Until recently removal of objects above the rectosigmoid junction has required laparotomy. A literature review reveals that since 1975 there have been 29 cases of colonoscopic removal of a variety of objects reported in fourteen publications. The authors have had experience with three cases of retained colonic foreign bodies (greater than 7 days) extracted using the colonoscope. All patients received preprocedure antibiotics and bowel preparation from below. All objects were removed using either the Olympus CF LB3R colonoscope or the Fujinon EVC-M videocolonoscope. The authors conclude that colonoscopic retrieval of foreign bodies is technically feasible, safe, less morbid, and less costly than laparotomy. This technique should be considered as the first step in management of these patients by endoscopic surgeons.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Peroral enteroscopic removal of a retained percutaneous transhepatic guidewire from the jejunum using a colonoscope.

Several authors have described the ability to perform small-intestine endoscopy with long, flexible fiberscopes. A peroral colonoscope has been used for small-bowel enteroscopy and biopsy. A pediatric colonoscope for jejunoscopy has been described. Herein we report a patient undergoing percutaneous transhepatic decompression for the extrahepatic biliary obstruction in whom the guidewire broke and was lost in the liver. The proximal end of the wire was within the liver, while the distal end exited the ampulla and lay within the upper jejunum. Utilizing a peroral approach with the flexible pediatric colonoscope, we recovered the guidewire without advancing it further into the jejunum, where it may have been lost and have necessitated a celiotomy.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The use of the 130-cm colonoscope for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

The 130-cm colonoscope was utilized to determine whether a deeper insertion could be accomplished after the usual enema preparation for routine flexible sigmoidoscopy and, if so, to what extent that would enhance the yield of neoplastic findings. Sixty-four patients were examined, and intubation was accomplished to the level of 69 cm compared with 48.1 cm for a matched control group that had flexible sigmoidoscopy with the 60-cm endoscope. Another 24 patients who had a barium enema prep had a significantly greater depth of insertion (81.4 cm). Only two polyps were found proximal to 60 cm. The 130-cm colonoscope does not offer any substantial advantage over the standard 60-cm sigmoidoscope unless a bowel preparation more thorough than enemas is given and then it would probably only be worthwhile using the colonoscope in patients who are above average risk for colorectal neoplasia.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Clinical results and development of variable-stiffness video colonoscopes.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: This study was designed to assess the usefulness of variable-stiffness video colonoscopes, compared with conventional videoscopes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The first prototype XCF-QAY1 and the latter prototype XCF-Q240A1 used in this study can be varied to 4 levels of stiffness of tube insertion during examination. In 352 consecutive colonoscopic examinations performed using these and two conventional scopes, the following data were recorded: time for intubation to the cecum, frequency of changes in the patients' posture, frequency of abdominal pressure attempts, and pain score. The degree of stiffness of the insertion tube and the examiners' impressions score were recorded only in procedures where the variable-stiffness scopes were used. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between colonoscopes in the pain score. Total colonoscopy rate was 97.4%. The frequency of usage of the varying stiffness control in the colon according to site was as follows: descending colon, 57.3%; transverse colon, 32.8%, sigmoid colon, 7.6%; and ascending colon, 2.3%. A significant difference in the mean time for intubation to the cecum between the XCF-Q240A1 and conventional scopes was observed. Moreover, there were significant differences in the frequency of abdominal pressure attempts and changes in the patient's posture between conventional scopes and the new scopes. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that only one scope, the XCF-Q240A1, is needed for any colonic examination by any examiner.

Aged↗