Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Codes of Ethics”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

An overview of the major changes in the 2002 APA Ethics Code.

This article summarizes the major changes that were made to the 2002 Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct of the American Psychological Association. The 2002 Ethics Code retains the general format of the 1992 Ethics Code and does not radically alter the obligations of psychologists. One goal of the Ethics Committee Task Force was to reduce the potential of the Ethics Code to be used to unnecessarily punish psychologists. In addition, the revised Ethics Code expresses greater sensitivity to the needs of cultural and linguistic minorities and students. Shortcomings of the 2002 Ethics Code are discussed.

Behavioral Research↗
PubMed1995

Ethics code and neuropsychological assessment practices.

The 1992 revision of the Ethics Code of the American Psychological Association is more detailed than its predecessor. Sections with direct relevance to neuropsychological assessment practice are discussed. Commentary and specific recommendations are provided regarding the issues of avoiding harm to patients, competence of the practitioner, test validity, test interpretation, maintenance of records, use and supervision of nondoctoral personnel, forensic activities, release of raw data, documentation of results, multiple relationships, and fees. Clinicians are urged to adhere to the Ethics Code rather than to a personnel standard of professional behavior.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1997

[Ethics code of the Chilean Biological Society].

The Chilean Biological Society has approved an ethics code for researchers, elaborated by its Ethic Committee. The text, with 16 articles, undertakes the main ethical problems that researchers must solve, such as institutional, professional or societal ethics, scientific fraud, breaches in collaborative work, relationships between researchers, participation in juries and committees, ethical breaches in scientific publications, scientific responsibility and punishments. This code declares its respect and valorization of all life forms and adheres to international biomedical ethical codes. It declares that all knowledge, created or obtained by researchers is mankind's heritage.

Biology↗
PubMed1994

Implications of the 1992 ethics code for the practice of individual psychotherapy.

The current ethics code (American Psychological Association [APA], 1992) provides improved standards through increased specificity and proscriptive guidance than did the previous code (APA, 1990). Standards 4 and 5 are focused for review in this article. Standard 4, Therapy, with additions such as structuring the relationship, obtaining informed consent, providing mental health services to those served by others, and interrupting and terminating services, are addressed and critiqued. Standard 5, Privacy and Confidentiality, is expanded in the current code. Some principles are critiqued with regard to their vagueness, their tendency to be dilute in terms of power and enforceability, their failure to maintain the highest principles for the welfare of clients, and their possible advocacy of the welfare of psychologists above that of the clients.

Codes of Ethics↗
PubMed1994

Teaching psychologists and the new APA ethics code: do we fit in?

The new American Psychological Association (APA) ethics code (APA, 1992) creates dilemmas of both image and substance for teaching psychologists. Items specific to teaching psychologists reflect housekeeping matters of lesser importance and situations over which teaching psychologists have little control. Teachers of psychology are sometimes inappropriately grouped with other types of psychologists. Freedom of inquiry and communication are curtailed in ambiguous ways, and the standards expected of teachers in the academy are set a mediocre level. Although the new code contains some improvements over the previous code (APA, 1990)--especially in the areas of multiple relationships, prohibitions against sex with students, respect for differences among students, and authorship rights retained by students--numerous recommendations for future revision are strongly recommended.

Authorship↗
PubMed1998

"Refusal to treat under six conditions", the earliest medical and ethical code in ancient China.

In the paper the principle of physician's "Refusal to treat under six cases" was reviewed. It was the first ethical code for physician in ancient China. The emergence of ethical code for physician was the result of medical professionalism and the formation of the professional groups. The principle proposed by the famous physician Bian-Que in ancient China, like Hippocratic Oath, was an ethics of outer achievement rather than one of inner intention. It provided a framework of medical behavior, and emerges as a powerful tool seeking to safeguard the reputation of the profession for its own sake rather than, in main, seeking to promote the patients' good.

China↗
PubMed1994

Morality in group and family therapies: multiperson therapies and the 1992 ethics code.

Although virtually every psychotherapeutic approach or orientation has adapted group and family therapy to its conceptions of psychological dysfunctions and how to treat them, levels of training of practitioners in all of these approaches are often insufficient to meet the requirements of ethically as well as technically responsible conduct of treatment for persons in groups and families. The new ethics code (American Psychological Association [APA], 1992) does include a few issues specific to multiperson therapies, but other issues critical to the competent practice of group and family therapy remain unaddressed. The result can be confusing to those applying standards for individual therapy to multiperson therapies. It is argued that the classical ethical concerns of psychotherapists, informed consent, confidentiality, countertransference reactions, aand intrusions of therapist values, require special sensitivity to how they are expressed in mulitperson therapies. Practitioners of group and family therapies must be better sensitized to the technical distinctions and the associated ethical vulnerabilities of the modalities they use. Future planning for revision of the APA ethics code should take these factors into account.

Codes of Ethics↗
PubMed2002

An educational imperative: The role of ethical codes and normative prohibitions in CBW-Applicable research.

This paper examines the role of ethics in research with potential applicability to chemical and biological warfare. If focuses upon biological warfare research, and examines the ethical dilemmas faced by those working with dual-use potential technologies. It discusses the normative, legal and ethical prohibitions against participation in chemical and biological warfare programmes from a Western perspective. It examines the motivations of individuals participating in CBW research and concludes with recommendations for increasing awareness about ethical and normative prohibitions. An appendix lists the results of a survey of ethical codes in relevant scientific disciplines conducted via the Internet.

Biological Warfare↗
PubMed1994

Explicit ambiguity: the 1992 ethics code as an oxymoron.

The author reviews the major themes emerging from commentators' reactions to the 1992 American Psychological Association ethics code and presents his own views as well. Commentators agreed that the 1992 code is improved by its increased breadth and specific attention to important issues not addressed in the previous code but criticized the code for its lack of clarity, its rampant qualifying language, and for seeming to protect the profession rather than the public. The author, finding the code overly long, detailed, and lawyered, recommends that those who revise the code in the 21st century adhere more closely to fundamental moral principles.

Codes of Ethics↗
PubMed2004

Release of test data under the 2002 Ethics Code and the HIPAA Privacy Rule: a raw deal or just a half-baked idea?

Until quite recently, many psychologists believed themselves ethically bound to fall on their swords before releasing raw test data to anyone but another qualified professional. Under the American Psychological Association Ethics Code (2002), consistent with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 Privacy Rule of 2002 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2002), test materials may still be protected, but documents containing participants' responses are ordinarily subject to disclosure. Although many may lament the cost to test security, the virtues of secrecy regarding testing are often exaggerated and its vices underestimated. Several measures, including appropriate informed consent, sensitive and detailed test feedback, offers of suitable alternatives to raw test data, copyright notices, and the use of protective orders and supervised inspection in forensic matters can still be used to maintain a reasonable degree of test security.

Codes of Ethics↗
PubMed2002

Multi-disciplinary working in a forensic mental health setting: ethical codes of reference.

This paper reports on a small research project on multidisciplinary team-working within a medium secure forensic unit in the United Kingdom. Although multidisciplinary team working is widely accepted as an effective strategy for the delivery of healthcare services in modern society it is also recognized that interdisciplinary problems can also occur. This study developed two questionnaires, one being delivered to a number of groups and teams in the secure unit, whilst the second one was geared to individuals. A thematic analysis was employed to develop category building and concept formation. The results highlighted a three-level ethical code referencing system that was employed by both individuals and groups. Within this, three domains, or trajectories, were identified that were polarized continuums of main tensions for multidisciplinary staff working in forensic practice.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed1997

Ethical codes for attorneys: a brief introduction.

Ethical standards for lawyers are contained in the Model Rules of Professional Conduct (which lays out both "shall/shall not" rules and "may" suggestions in nine broad areas) and the Model Code of Professional Responsibility (which covers essentially the same topic areas but offers more detailed commentary). Topics included in the Rules are the client-lawyer relationship, the attorney's role as an advocate and counselor, law firms and associations, public service, transactions with individuals other than clients and information about legal services including advertising, firm names, and letterhead. The American Dental Association's Principles of Ethics and Code of Professional Conduct is organized around the five ethical principles of patient autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, justice, and veracity. There are substantial similarities in intent between the ethical standards of dentists and lawyers; there are also differences.

Advertising↗
PubMed1994

Multiple relationships: does the new ethics code answer the right questions?

The new "Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct" (American Psychological Association, 1992) presented expanded attempts to clarify the ethical issues regarding multiple relationships and to provide useful guidance for psychologists. This article proposes that the new code fails to address adequately two basic questions necessary to provide psychologists with clear guidance: (a) What are multiple relationships? and (b) When do multiple relationships constitute unethical conduct? The article offers a definition of multiple relationships and identifies several dynamics operating within a professional relationship that are likely to be adversely affected by the imposition of a secondary relationship. Unethical multiple relationships are defined. Finally, the article suggests additions to the new code that would enhance its utility for psychologists.

Codes of Ethics↗