Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Clarithromycin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized study comparing clarithromycin with erythromycin. Canada-Sweden Clarithromycin-Pneumonia Study Group.

The efficacy and safety of orally administered clarithromycin and erythromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia were assessed in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study. Two hundred sixty-eight patients were randomized to receive either clarithromycin, 250 mg twice a day, or erythromycin stearate, 500 mg 4 times a day, for 7 to 14 days. Efficacy was evaluable in 173 patients (92 for clarithromycin, 81 for erythromycin). No statistically significant difference in clinical success rate (cure or improvement) was observed between the two groups (clarithromycin, 97 percent; erythromycin, 96 percent). Both groups had identical radiologic response (97 percent with resolution or improvement). Similarly, no statistically significant difference in bacteriologic response toward the target pathogens was observed among evaluable patients (clarithromycin, 23/26; erythromycin, 17/17; p value = 0.287). Clinical response toward Mycoplasma and Chlamydia pneumonia was comparable between the two groups (clarithromycin, 15/16; erythromycin, 10/11). However, patients receiving erythromycin had a twofold higher incidence of adverse events, mostly related to the gastrointestinal system, and were five times more likely to withdraw from therapy because of drug-related adverse events. These results show that clarithromycin is as effective as erythromycin in the outpatient treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Furthermore, the lower incidence of adverse events associated with clarithromycin indicates that it is more acceptable to patients and, therefore, can enhance compliance.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparative study of modified-release clarithromycin and immediate-release clarithromycin in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy containing immediate-release clarithromycin is an important regimen for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). However, the efficacy of modified-release clarithromycin for the treatment of H. pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease is still unknown. The aims of the study were to compare the efficacy of modified-release clarithromycin and immediate-release clarithromycin on the rates of ulcer healing and eradication of H. pylori. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and sixty-one patients with Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer were randomized to receive one-week triple therapy with either modified-release clarithromycin 1000mg once daily (AECMR) or immediate-release clarithromycin 500mg twice daily (AECIR) in combination with amoxicillin 1,000mg twice daily (A) and esomeprazole 40mg once daily (E). Post-treatment ulcer healing status and Helicobacter pylori status was determined by endoscopy and 13C urea-breath test at 16 weeks and 8 weeks after completion of triple therapy, respectively. RESULTS: Helicobacter pylori eradication rates were 87.5% and 87.7% for AECMR and AECIR, respectively, in the intent-to-treat analysis. Eradication rates in the per-protocol groups were 90.3% and 91.4% for AECMR and AECIR, respectively. In both the intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, the eradication rates were comparable in the AECMR and AECIR groups (p= 1.0 and 1.0, respectively). Ulcer healing rates in the intention-to-treat analysis were 81.3% and 77.8% for AECMR and AECIR, respectively. Ulcer healing rates in the per-protocol analysis were 90.3% and 90.0% for AECMR and AECIR groups, respectively. In both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, the ulcer healing rates were comparable in the AECMR and AECIR groups (p=0.645 and 0.584, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Modified-release clarithromycin 1000mg once daily can be used as an alternative to immediate-release clarithromycin 500mg twice daily for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease.

Amoxicillin↗
PubMed2000

Clarithromycin-resistant mycobacterium avium is still susceptible to treatment with clarithromycin and is virulent in mice.

Resistance to clarithromycin in breakthrough Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) isolates typically occurs 3 to 4 months after the initiation of monotherapy in bacteremic AIDS patients. It has been suggested that continuation of clarithromycin therapy still results in clinical and microbiological improvement. To study this paradox, C57BL/6 beige mice were infected with a clarithromycin-resistant (MIC, > or =128 microg/ml) strain of MAC 101 (CLA-R MAC 101) and treated with 200 mg of clarithromycin per kg of body weight/day alone or in combination with ethambutol (100 mg/kg/day) for 2 weeks. Mice infected with a clarithromycin-susceptible strain of MAC 101 had bacterial loads reduced by 90% in the liver and 91% in the spleen (P<0.05, compared with the control). Clarithromycin treatment of CLA-R MAC 101 resulted in a 65% reduction of bacterial loads in the liver (P = 0.009) and a 71% reduction in the spleen (P = 0.009), compared with the results for the untreated control. CLA-R MAC 101 and MAC 101 (isogenic strains) had comparable growth rates in murine tissue, ruling out a loss of virulence of CLA-R MAC 101. Strains of MAC currently defined as macrolide resistant may still respond to treatment with an agent such as clarithromycin within infected tissues.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2005

Comparative efficacy of once daily, 5-day short-course therapy with clarithromycin extended-release versus twice daily, 7-day therapy with clarithromycin immediate-release in acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of two clarithromycin regimens, extended-release (ER) 1000 mg once daily for 5 days and immediate-release (IR) 500 mg twice daily for 7 days, in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (ABECB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study of ambulatory patients at least 40 years old with a presumptive diagnosis of ABECB, purulent sputum, and documented evidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) < 70% of predicted value. Clinical cure, bacteriological cure, and target pathogen eradication rates were determined at a test-of-cure visit (study days 14-40). Safety was assessed based on the incidence of study drug-related adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 485 patients were randomized (240 to ER and 245 to IR). Clinical cure rates were similar for evaluable patients treated with ER (84%, 157/187) and those treated with IR (84%, 172/204) (95% CI -7.9, 7.2). The bacteriological cure rates were 87% (82/94) and 89% (91/102), and the overall target pathogen eradication rates were 88% (107/122) and 89% (117/131) for the respective treatment groups. The incidence of adverse events was 13% (31/240) in the ER group and 18% (45/245) in the IR group. The rate of gastrointestinal adverse events was lower with ER (8%, 19/240) compared to IR (11%, 26/245). Clarithromycin ER-treated patients reported statistically significantly fewer adverse events due to abnormal taste than did clarithromycin IR-treated patients (3% and 8%, respectively, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Both once-daily, 5-day, short-course therapy with clarithromycin ER and 7-day, twice-daily therapy with clarithromycin IR were effective in resolving clinical signs/symptoms of ABECB and eradicating the causative pathogens, with no statistically significant difference in clinical cure rate between the treatment groups. Clarithromycin ER was better tolerated, causing fewer gastrointestinal adverse events and statistically significantly fewer reports of abnormal taste as compared with clarithromycin IR.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

Randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study of the efficacy and tolerability of IV gatifloxacin with the option for oral stepdown gatifloxacin versus IV ceftriaxone (with or without erythromycin or clarithromycin) with the option for oral stepdown clarithromycin for treatment of patients with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Empiric therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) requires the use of antibiotics with activity against a broad spectrum of respiratory pathogens and suitable pharmacokinetic properties to simplify IV-to-oral step-down therapy switches. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of IV gatifloxacin with the option for oral stepdown gatifloxacin with a standard regimen of IV ceftriaxone (with or without erythromycin or clarithromycin) with the option for oral stepdown clarithromycin in patients with mild to moderate CAP requiring hospitalization. METHODS: In a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study, adults with CAP received 7 to 14 days of treatment with either IV gatifloxacin 400 mg QD with the stepdown option or IV ceftriaxone 1 or 2 g QD (with or without erythromycin 0.5 or 1 g QID or clarithromycin 500 mg BID) with the stepdown option. RESULTS: One hundred seventy adults with CAP were included in the study. IV gatifloxacin was stepped down to oral gatifloxacin in 90.6% (7785) of patients; IV ceftriaxone was stepped down to oral clarithromycin in 87.1% (7485) of patients. Among clinically evaluable patients (n = 153), cure rates at 1 to 3 days after treatment were 97.4% in the gatifloxacin group (7476) and 90.9% in the ceftriaxone group (7077), with a 95% CI for the difference (-3.7% to 19.1%) indicating statistical equivalence. In patients in whom pathogens were isolated from pretreatment sputum cultures, bacteriologic eradication rates were 100.0% (2929) and 90.9% (3033), respectively. Both regimens were well tolerated; treatment-related adverse events occurred in 27.1% (2385) and 21.2% (1885) of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the population studied, treatment with IV gatifloxacin with an option for oral stepdown gatifloxacin was as effective for achieving clinical cure as IV ceftriaxone (with or without concomitant IV erythromycin or clarithromycin) with an option for oral stepdown clarithromycin. Both regimens were well tolerated.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Low-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus metronidazole vs. full-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus amoxicillin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection.

AIM: To compare, in a randomized controlled trial, the efficacy and tolerability of two 1-week triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and H. pylori infection were randomized to receive lansoprazole 30 mg once daily, clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily (LCM group), or lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, and amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily (LCA group). H. pylori status was assessed by rapid urease test, histology and 13C-urea breath test before and after therapy. RESULTS: At 3 months, H. pylori eradication (intention- to-treat/per protocol analysis) was 92.4%/93.8% in the LCM group and 83.1%/85.7% in the LCA group (P=N.S.). Side-effects were more frequently reported in the LCA group (37.9%) than in the LCM group (19.7%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this open, randomized controlled trial, eradication of H. pylori by low-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus metronidazole was higher with significantly less side-effects than by full-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus amoxicillin. This finding may be related to the stronger synergism of clarithromycin plus metronidazole, even at lower doses, than of clarithromycin plus amoxicillin. Considering the lower cost as well, LCM should be preferred to LCA in the eradication of H. pylori.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗
PubMed1993

Clarithromycin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections: two multicenter clinical studies. Clarithromycin Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Clarithromycin is a new macrolide analog of erythromycin with activity against a number of dermatologic pathogens. METHODS: The efficacy and safety of clarithromycin, 250 mg bid, were compared with those of reference drugs, cefadroxil and erythromycin, in two multicenter studies: (1) a randomized, double-blind 45-center study, in which clarithromycin or cefadroxil 500 mg bid was given for 5-14 days; and (2) a single-blind 31-center study, in which clarithromycin or erythromycin, 250 mg qid, was given for < or = 14 days. RESULTS: In the first study, efficacy and safety were evaluated in 299 and 538 patients, respectively. In the second study, the numbers were 141 and 261 patients, respectively. Overall, clarithromycin was as effective and safe as cefadroxil and erythromycin. CONCLUSIONS: Clarithromycin provides an alternative therapy to cefadroxil and erythromycin for skin and skin structure infections, especially in beta-lactam allergic patients.

Cefadroxil↗
PubMed2002

Clarithromycin mediated the expression of polymorphonuclear granulocyte response against streptococcus pneumoniae strains with different patterns of susceptibility and resistance to penicillin and clarithromycin.

There is an urgent need for antibiotics that can be used in the therapy of infections caused by penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, the incidence of which is often associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Antibiotics that can interact positively with the immune response and that also possess microbicidal properties might significantly contribute to improving the outcome of S. pneumoniae infections. Therefore, in the present study we investigated the effect of clarithromycin, an extended spectrum macrolide currently used in the treatment of respiratory tract infections, on the in vitro interaction between human polymorphonuclear granulocytes (PMN) and three strains of S. pneumoniae with different susceptibility or resistance patterns to both penicillin and clarithromycin. At a concentration of one-half the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), clarithromycin significantly enhanced human PMN functions, particularly intracellular bactericidal activity, against all the S. pneumoniae strains, including resistant ones. This finding may help to explain clarithromycin activity in vivo despite apparent resistance in vitro. Preexposure of PMNs to one-half the MIC of clarithromycin had no effect on either phagocytosis or intracellular killing, ruling out a direct antibiotic action on PMNs. Preexposure of streptococci to clarithromycin increased the susceptibility of S. pneumoniae to the bactericidal mechanisms of human PMNs compared with untreated bacteria, indicating that this macrolide may partly reduce bacterial virulence via changes in S. pneumoniae.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1997

A retrospective comparison of clarithromycin versus rifampin in combination treatment for disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex disease in AIDS: clarithromycin decreases transfusion requirements.

SETTING: Urban county medical center. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes associated with two treatment regimens for AIDS-associated disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (DMAC). From 1989 to mid-1992, patients were treated with rifampin, ethambutol, and clofazimine; in mid-1992 clarithromycin replaced rifampin. DESIGN: A retrospective review of patients with DMAC; the main outcome measures assessed were toxicity associated with DMAC treatment, transfusions after the diagnosis of DMAC, and survival. RESULTS: 88 patients received the rifampin-based regimen and 86 were treated with the clarithromycin-based regimen. Drug-related adverse events were recorded less frequently with clarithromycin treatment (21% vs. 42%, P = 0.005), and additional antimycobacterial agents were used less often (28% vs. 44%, P = 0.04). In a multivariate logistic regression model, severe anemia at the time of DMAC diagnosis was associated with transfusion-dependence (relative risk [RR] 5.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2, 13.8, P < 0.001) and clarithromycin treatment was inversely associated with transfusion dependence (RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1, 0.98, P = 0.04). In a multivariate Cox regression model including other factors affecting survival, clarithromycin treatment did not confer a survival advantage (P = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: The clarithromycin-containing regimen was better tolerated and was associated with substantially lower transfusion requirements than the rifampin-based regimen; survival was not affected.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed1999

Ranitidine bismuth citrate, tetracycline, clarithromycin twice-a-day triple therapy for clarithromycin susceptible Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: Although many combination therapies have been proposed, there is still interest in identifying simple, inexpensive, effective protocols that have high rates of success. AIM: To investigate the role of the new soluble form of bismuth, ranitidine bismuth citrate, in twice-a-day therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: Patients with histologically and culture proven H. pylori infection received ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg, tetracycline HCl 500 mg, and clarithromycin 500 mg, each b.d. for 14 days, followed by 300 mg ranitidine once a day for 4 additional weeks. Outcome was assessed 4 or more weeks after the end of antimicrobial therapy by repeat endoscopy with histology and culture (49 patients) or urea breath testing (14 patients). RESULTS: Sixty-three patients completed the therapy, 59 men and four women (average age 56.7 years; range 31-75 years). All patients had clarithromycin-susceptible strains prior to therapy. H. pylori infection was cured in 94% (95% CI: 85-98%). There was a therapy failure in one patient who took the medicine for only 1 day and stopped because of side-effects. Three of the isolates from treatment failures were available post-failure; two were clarithromycin-resistant and one was susceptible. Side-effects were severe in two patients (3%) and moderate in three (primarily diarrhoea). CONCLUSIONS: Twice-a-day ranitidine bismuth citrate, tetracycline, clarithromycin triple therapy was well tolerated and effective for the treatment of H. pylori infection in patients with clarithromycin-susceptible H. pylori.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin with omeprazole plus clarithromycin for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: Many dual and triple therapy treatment regimens have been proposed for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. However, assessing the relative efficacy of these regimens is complicated by differences in study design, and few well-controlled comparative studies have been reported. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind study involved 530 duodenal ulcer patients, of whom 520 had confirmed H. pylori infection. Patients received 14 days b.d. dual therapy of either ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) 400 mg or omeprazole 20 mg, both with clarithromycin 500 mg to eradicate H. pylori, followed by a further 14 days of treatment with RBC 400 mg b. d. or omeprazole 20 mg o.d. to facilitate ulcer healing. H. pylori eradication and ulcer healing were assessed at least 26 days after the end of treatment. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: H. pylori was eradicated in 90% of patients who received RBC with clarithromycin and in 66% of patients who received omeprazole with clarithromycin (per protocol; P<0.001). intention-to-treat eradication rates were 77% and 60%, respectively (P<0.001). Ulcer healing rates were 97% in the RBC treatment group and 95% in the omeprazole treatment group. Only 3% and 1% of patients in the RBC and omeprazole treatment groups, respectively, were withdrawn due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: RBC with clarithromycin is a simple and highly effective dual therapy regimen for the eradication of H. pylori, and is significantly more effective than omeprazole with clarithromycin. Both treatment regimens are well tolerated and effectively heal duodenal ulcers.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Additive effect of clarithromycin combined with 14-hydroxy clarithromycin, erythromycin, amoxycillin, metronidazole or omeprazole against Helicobacter pylori.

The in-vitro activities of clarithromycin, 14-OH clarithromycin, erythromycin, amoxycillin, metronidazole and omeprazole against Helicobacter pylori were determined at pH 7.2 and 5.5. At pH 5.5 the activities of clarithromycin and erythromycin decreased approximately 16 times while 14-OH clarithromycin was less influenced. Chequerboard titration indicated that the combined activity of clarithromycin and the other compounds was additive.

Amoxicillin↗
PubMed1999

Treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in outpatients: randomized study of clarithromycin alone versus clarithromycin and cefuroxime.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of clarithromycin alone in comparison with the combination of clarithromycin and cefuroxime in the treatment of nonhospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in a Mediterranean population. METHODS: CAP was defined as the acute onset of fever (>38 degrees C) with pulmonary opacity on chest roentgenogram. The American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria (1993) were used to decide on patient hospitalization. Ninety subjects, of whom 53 (59%) were men, with a mean age (+/-SD) of 38+/-15 years, were randomized: 45 received clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. orally for 14 days (CL group), and 45 received clarithromycin plus cefuroxime 500 mg b.i.d. orally for 7 days (CLCE group). Patients were monitored with clinical, radiological, and laboratory controls at 3 and 21 days. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to demographic, clinical, physical and laboratory data. RESULTS: The mean time to defervescence was 2.4+/-1.4 and 2.4+/-1.5 days, respectively. Chest roentgenogram clearance was complete in all cases, without statistically significant differences in the time to resolution between both arms. Side effects were mild (no significant differences between groups): 5 patients in the CL group and 3 in the CLCE group showed gastrointestinal symptoms. Two patients (2.2%), both in the CLCE group, needed hospital admission during follow-up, but all 90 patients showed an excellent outcome. A causative agent was determined in 25 cases (28%). Legionella pneumophila, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae were the most frequent pathogens. CONCLUSION: Empirical treatment of outpatient CAP with clarithromycin can be considered adequate in the Mediterranean area, independently of the microbiological etiology. ATS criteria for admitting patients with CAP are appropriate in this population.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Activities of clarithromycin, ofloxacin, and clarithromycin plus ethambutol against Mycobacterium simiae in murine model of disseminated infection.

After 2 weeks of intravenous challenge with Mycobacterium simiae, ICR outbred mice were treated with clarithromycin, ofloxacin, or clarithromycin plus ethambutol for 4 weeks. All three therapy groups demonstrated a decrease in the level of infection in both the lungs and the spleen. There were no significant differences among the three treated groups in decreasing mycobacterial counts in the lungs; however, both ofloxacin and clarithromycin plus ethambutol were superior to clarithromycin alone in reducing the level of infection in the spleen. Results of the study suggest a potential role for these agents in the treatment of human M. simiae infection.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

A randomized trial comparing seven-day ranitidine bismuth citrate and clarithromycin dual therapy to seven-day omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

OBJECTIVE: To assess Helicobacter pylori eradication after one week dual ranitidine bismuth citrate-clarithromycin (RBC-C) or triple omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin (OCA) therapy. METHODS: In this multicentre Canadian trial, H pylori-positive patients with functional dyspepsia or inactive peptic ulcer disease were randomized to open-label treatment with RBC-C (ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg plus clarithromycin 500 mg) or OCA (omezaprole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1000 mg), given twice a day for seven days. Treatment allocation was randomly assigned. H pylori infection was confirmed by positive 13C-urea breath test (13C-UBT). H pylori status was reassessed by UBT at least four and 12 weeks after treatment (negative: d13CO2 below 3.5 per mil). Intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rates were determined for all patients with confirmed H pylori infection. Per protocol (PP) rate was determined for all patients treated with at least two evaluable follow-up visits. RESULTS: Three hundred five patients were included in the ITT and 222 in the PP analysis. The ITT eradication rates were 66% for RBC-C and 78% for OCA. The PP success rates were 84% for RBC-C and 96% for OCA. The difference for both ITT 12% (95% CI 2 to 22) and PP 12% (95% CI 4 to 19) were statistically significant, P=0.030 and P=0.007, respectively. Treatment was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The eradication rate for the seven-day dual RBC-C regimen was lower than that for OCA.

Amoxicillin↗
PubMed2004

A comparative clarithromycin bioavailability study: determination of clarithromycin and 14-(R)-hydroxyclarithromycin under fasting and fed conditions.

OBJECTIVE: To report the first comprehensive analysis of clarithromycin (CLA) and 14-(R)-hydroxyclarithromcin (14R) bioequivalence metrics under both fasting and fed conditions when using a validated analytical method. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In separate, single dose bioequivalence studies, fasting (n = 40) and fed (n = 18) non-smoking subjects entered a 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence, crossover trial to assess the comparative bioavailability of a 500 mg generic clarithromycin tablet (IVAX Pharmaceuticals, NJ, USA) relative to the reference product (Biaxin Filmtab, Abbott Laboratories, IL, USA). The validated assay employed an HPLC coupled to a triple stage quadrupole mass spectrometer. RESULTS: The analytics permitted plasma samples to be measured for both analytes with high precision and a lower limit ofquantitation (LLOQ) of 11 ng/ml. In both fasting and fed studies, and for both analytes, the IVAX product met the common mean geometric ratio and 90% confidence limits in order to be declared bioequivalent with Biaxin Filmtab. Furthermore, the intra-subject variabilities for the comparative AUC metrics in both studies and for both analytes were < or = 21% and < or = 26% for Cmax. CONCLUSIONS: The fasting and fed results present definitive evidence that 500 mg IVAX clarithromycin and Biaxin Filmtab are bioequivalent under both fasting and fed conditions, whether based on CLA or 14R. Furthermore, at a 500 mg dose, clarithromycin is not a highly variable drug.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

[Double blind randomized multicentre study of a seven-day eradication regime of Helicobacter pylori by omeprazole, clarithromycin and ornidazole vs. omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole].

Effective eradication regimes of Helicobacter pylori infections are nowadays based on administration of a substance with a strong suppressive effect on production of gastric HCl combined with two antibiotics. As suppressor of gastric HCl production unequivocally some drug from the group of proton pump blockers is used. As to antibiotics, in first line therapy the following are recommended: clarithromycin, amoxicillin, metronidazole. A problem in the eradication therapy of Helicobacter pylori infection in recent years is the increasing resistance to clarithromycin and apparently also metronidazole. In the Czech Republic the resistance to clarithromycin in relation to Helicobacter pylori is stabilized at a level lower than 3.0 %. Resistance to metronidazole was reported in 1992 within the range of 24 % - 26 %, however in 2001 it was already 36.0 %. Therefore the question arises whether it is possible under our conditions to check the increasing metronidazole resistance by a drug which by its spectrum of action resembles metronidazole while it differs from it as to its chemical structure. This is the reason why the authors implemented a trial where metronidazole was replaced by tinodazole (Avrazor, Léciva Co.). The results revealed that in the group treated with tinidazole eradication was achieved after 7-day administration of ornidazole in 93.0 %, in the group where part of the eradication regime was metronidazole eradication was 82.6 %. The tolerance of both drugs was very good. The authors recommend to include the pattern omeprazole 2 x 20 mg, clarithromycin 2 x 500 mg and tinidazole 2 x 500 mg among first line therapeutic regimes.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

In vitro activity of fosfomycin alone and in combination with amoxicillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole against Helicobacter pylori compared with combined clarithromycin and metronidazole.

In order to evaluate the suitability of fosfomycin in combination with other agents for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infections, the susceptibility profiles of 65 H. pylori strains were determined against multiple antimicrobial agents and combinations thereof using the agar dilution method. For fosfomycin alone, the range of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results and the MICs at which 50% and 90% of strains were inhibited were 0.5-32 microg/ml and 2 and 4 microg/ml, respectively. For the combination of fosfomycin with amoxicillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole, the means calculated for the minimum and maximum fractional inhibitory concentration index were 0.70-1.17 and 1.15-2.03, respectively, suggesting partial synergy or indifference in the majority of strains. The combination of clarithromycin and metronidazole showed synergistic activity against 14 of 28 H. pylori strains tested. The in vitro activity results suggest the combination of fosfomycin with either amoxicillin or clarithromycin may be a promising alternative for the treatment of H. pylori infection. However, the clinical efficacy of these regimens remains to be investigated.

Amoxicillin↗