Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Checklist”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Preliminary validation of an observational pain checklist for persons with cognitive impairments and inability to communicate verbally.

To obtain a preliminary validation of the Non-Communicating Children's Pain Checklist for individuals with an inability to communicate verbally, 32 caregivers of individuals with cognitive impairments aged 3 to 44 years retrospectively completed the Non-Communicating Children's Pain Checklist and rated item usefulness (0 to 10). In the second part of the study 33 caregivers completed the Checklist after two painful (e.g. burns, falls, surgery), one distressful (e.g. unwanted grooming, feared animal/noise), and one calm event (e.g. watching television). Checklist scores did not correlate with the age, sex, or physical limitations of individuals with an inability to communicate verbally. In the first part of the study Cronbach's alpha was 0.66; all mean usefulness ratings exceeded 5 out of 10. In the second part of the study after four items were removed, Cronbach's alpha was 0.79. Checklist scores during pain correlated with numerical ratings of pain intensity did not differ between the two pain events, and differed significantly from calm scores. Differences in Checklist scores during pain and distress were found for two subscales. The Checklist exhibits internal consistency, and preliminary evidence suggests it can detect pain and is reliable over time.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Reliability and validity of the PAS-ADD Checklist for detecting psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual disability.

The PAS-ADD Checklist is a screening instrument specifically designed to help staff recognize mental health problems in the people with intellectual disability for whom they care, and to make informed referral decisions. The instrument consists of a life-events checklist and 29 symptom items scored on a four-point scale. Scores are combined to provide three threshold scores. The crossing of any of these thresholds indicates the need for a fuller assessment. The items are worded in everyday language, making the Checklist suitable for use by individuals who do not have a background in psychopathology. The present paper presents the results of a number of studies evaluating the reliability and validity of the Checklist. Factor analysis of Checklists completed on a community sample of 201 individuals yielded eight factors, of which seven were readily interpretable in diagnostic terms. Internal consistency of the scales was generally acceptable. Inter-rater reliability in respect to individual items gave a fairly low average Kappa of 0.42. However, agreement on case identification, the main purpose of the Checklist, was quite good, with 83% of the decision being in agreement. Validity in relation to clinical opinion was also satisfactory, case detection rising appropriately with the clinically judged severity of disorder. The PAS-ADD Checklist is published and distributed by the Hester Adrian Research Centre, Manchester, England, from where further information and order forms are available on request.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

A checklist for evaluating ergonomic risk factors associated with upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders.

A two-page checklist for determining the presence of ergonomic risk factors associated with the development of upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders (e.g., repetitiveness, local mechanical contact stresses, forceful manual exertions, awkward postures, and hand tool usage) was developed and evaluated as part of a joint labour-management ergonomics intervention programme. This checklist was used by plant personnel at four work sites to assess the presence of upper extremity risk factors in 335 manufacturing and warehouse jobs. In addition, results generated by the checklist were compared to the results of ergonomic analyses performed by persons with advanced training (Masters degree) in occupational ergonomics for a subset of 51 jobs. Most of the jobs included in the survey were found to have significant exposures to upper extremity risk factors. Awkward work postures were common, with 90% of the jobs requiring wrist deviations outside the neutral range-of-motion. The jobs were also highly repetitive and frequently required workers to exert high hand forces. Results generated by the checklist were generally in agreement with results generated by the ergonomic analysts; however, the checklist was found to be more sensitive in identifying the presence of risk factors. The checklist was found to be an effective rapid-screening instrument for identifying jobs that expose workers to potentially harmful ergonomic stresses. However, the checklist methodology did not include sufficient documentation of work methods to identify specific job attributes associated with these exposures.

Arm Injuries↗
PubMed1991

An evaluation of anesthesiologists' present checkout methods and the validity of the FDA checklist.

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published the Anesthesia Apparatus Checkout Recommendations (checklist) in order to improve the methods anesthesiologists use to check out anesthesia equipment. Whereas no published study of current checkout methods had been performed since the introduction of the FDA checklist, we compared anesthesiologists' current anesthesia equipment pre-use checkout methods with anesthesiologists' use of the FDA checklist. One hundred and eighty-eight anesthesiologists were tested to compare the number of prearranged anesthesia machine faults that could be detected with 1) their own checkout methods and 2) the FDA checklist. The average number of machine faults detected with the individual anesthesiologists' checkout methods was 1.03/4 (25.8%) and with the FDA checklist was 1.20/4 (29.9%). For only one fault, malfunction of the oxygen/nitrous oxide ratio protection system, was there a statistically significant improvement (P less than 0.01) with the use of the FDA checklist. Anesthesiologists in residency training detected more faults (average 2.46/8, 30.8%) than did anesthesiologists who primarily practiced direct patient care (1.98/8, 23.9%) (P less than 0.01). Our data indicate that the mere introduction of the FDA checklist did not improve the ability of anesthesiologists to detect anesthesia machine faults.

Anesthesiology↗
PubMed2002

The effect of candidates' perceptions of the evaluation method on reliability of checklist and global rating scores in an objective structured clinical examination.

PURPOSE: Process-oriented global ratings, which assess "overall performance" on one or a number of domains, have been purported to capture nuances of expert performance better than checklists. Pilot data indicate that students change behaviors depending on their perceptions of how they are being scored, while experts do not. This study examines the impact of the students' orientation to the rating system on OSCE scores and the interstation reliability of the checklist and global scores. METHOD: A total of 57 third- and fourth-year medical students at one school were randomly assigned to two groups and performed a ten-station OSCE. Group 1 was told that scores were based on checklists. Group 2 was informed that performance would be rated using global ratings geared toward assessing overall competence. All candidates were scored by physician-examiners who were unaware of the students' orientations to the rating system and who used both checklists and global rating forms. RESULTS: A mixed two-factor ANOVA identified a significant interaction of rating form by group (F(1,55) = 5.5, p <.05), with Group 1 (checklist-oriented) having higher checklist scores but lower global scores than did Group 2 (oriented to global ratings). In addition, Group 1 had higher interstation alpha coefficients than did Group 2 for both global scores (0.74 versus 0.63) and checklist scores (0.63 versus 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: The interaction effect on total exam scores suggests that students adapt their behaviors to the system of evaluation. However, the lower reliability coefficients for both forms found in the process-oriented global-rating group suggest that an individual's capacity to adapt to the system of global rating forms is relatively station-specific, possibly depending on his or her expertise in the domain represented in each station.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1998

The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.

OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of creating a valid and reliable checklist with the following features: appropriate for assessing both randomised and non-randomised studies; provision of both an overall score for study quality and a profile of scores not only for the quality of reporting, internal validity (bias and confounding) and power, but also for external validity. DESIGN: A pilot version was first developed, based on epidemiological principles, reviews, and existing checklists for randomised studies. Face and content validity were assessed by three experienced reviewers and reliability was determined using two raters assessing 10 randomised and 10 non-randomised studies. Using different raters, the checklist was revised and tested for internal consistency (Kuder-Richardson 20), test-retest and inter-rater reliability (Spearman correlation coefficient and sign rank test; kappa statistics), criterion validity, and respondent burden. MAIN RESULTS: The performance of the checklist improved considerably after revision of a pilot version. The Quality Index had high internal consistency (KR-20: 0.89) as did the subscales apart from external validity (KR-20: 0.54). Test-retest (r 0.88) and inter-rater (r 0.75) reliability of the Quality Index were good. Reliability of the subscales varied from good (bias) to poor (external validity). The Quality Index correlated highly with an existing, established instrument for assessing randomised studies (r 0.90). There was little difference between its performance with non-randomised and with randomised studies. Raters took about 20 minutes to assess each paper (range 10 to 45 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that it is feasible to develop a checklist that can be used to assess the methodological quality not only of randomised controlled trials but also non-randomised studies. It has also shown that it is possible to produce a checklist that provides a profile of the paper, alerting reviewers to its particular methodological strengths and weaknesses. Further work is required to improve the checklist and the training of raters in the assessment of external validity.

Bias↗
PubMed1988

The agreement between behaviour checklists and structured psychiatric interviews for children.

There are few reports in the literature on the agreement between structured interviews and behaviour checklists in terms of specific diagnostic categories. The objective of this paper is to see how this agreement varies by source of information and diagnosis. One hundred children and their parents referred to a mental health clinic were given the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA). Parents and teachers also completed a checklist, the Survey Diagnostic Instrument, a modification of the Child Behaviour Checklist. Using likelihood ratios, the parent checklist agreed best with the parent interview, regardless of diagnosis. Among DSM-III diagnoses, the combined disorder anxiety-depression obtained the highest agreement with the DICA, attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity the next, and conduct disorder the lowest. For screening purposes, combining the parent and teacher checklists appears best, while, for diagnostic purposes, using the parent checklist alone may suffice. Nevertheless, positive predictive values remain low and may remain an inherent limitation of any checklist.

Anxiety Disorders↗
PubMed2026

An updated checklist of testate amoebae in China.

We present an updated checklist of testate amoebae (TA) in China covering TA records in the literature of the past &#x223c;100&#xa0;years. In total 363 TA species/subspecies in 53 genera have been included in the current Chinese checklist. The updated Chinese checklist includes five recently discovered TA species (Netzelia mulanensis, Pentagonia zhangduensis, Pontigulasia pentangulostoma, Cornutheca jiuhuensis, and Planhoogenraadia wuchanica) and 24 TA species/subspecies that have been added as new records for China. TA taxonomy and classification in the updated Chinese checklist are based on current knowledge derived from morphological, physiological, and molecular (ribosomal and mitochondrial DNA sequence data, genomics) studies. Corresponding changes in the updated Chinese checklist are outlined and the taxonomy and diversity of (Chinese) TA as well as their biogeography, ecology, and conservation are discussed. As all kinds of TA studies are eventually based on a reliable taxonomy and nomenclature, we are confident that our updated Chinese checklist will be of great value for TA researchers not only in China, but also worldwide.

China↗
PubMed1995

Teaching newborn medicine to third-year medical students. Use of a checklist.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if use of a checklist during the third-year medical student's newborn medicine rotation within the pediatric clerkship affected grades, end-of-course examination scores, or perceptions of the new-born clinical experience before and after use of this teaching aid. METHODS: The checklist contained 46 newborn medicine-related skills and concepts and required staff review. A postclerkship questionnaire was used to assess the student's perception of all components of the clinical clerkship. A standardized test was used to assess clinical knowledge. The clerkship grade was based on test scores (30%) and clinical performance (70%). RESULTS: All students (N = 321) returned the postclerkship questionnaire from July 1, 1988, to June 30, 1990, and the checklist plus questionnaire (N = 294) from July 1, 1990, to June 30, 1992. During both periods, the curriculum and clinical experience remained unchanged. Although there was no change in grade distribution, mean final examination score (P < .011) and student perception of the nursery portion of the clerkship (P < .01) improved significantly after we began using the checklist. "Poor" ratings of the nursey experience decreased from 12% (1988 to 1989) to 3% (1991 to 1992), and "excellent" ratings increased from 13% to 24%. In addition, examination performance on specific examination questions appeared related to completion of checklist items (r = .68, P < .016). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a readily available checklist, to remind students and faculty of the skills and concepts to be mastered during the nursey portion of the clerkship, did not impact final grades, although information transfer and student perception of the clinical experience improved. We speculate that clear delineation of readily available objectives focuses students and staff, decreases anxiety, and provides a sense of accomplishment.

Clinical Clerkship↗
PubMed1995

The Icelandic Child Mental Health Study. An epidemiological study of Icelandic children 2-18 years of age using the child behaviour checklist as a screening instrument.

The purpose of this study was to test the applicability of a standardised procedure for assessing Icelandic children's behaviour/emotional problems and competencies, and to identify differences related to demographic variables. This study focuses upon the method of using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) by Achenbach to estimate the reported prevalence of parents and adolescents of emotional and behaviour problems in children from 2-16 years of age and self-reported prevalence of adolescents from 11-18 years, selected at random from the general population, both in urban and rural areas. The information was obtained by mailing checklists with a letter to parents of children 2-10 years of age. The checklists for adolescents 11-18 years of age were distributed by teachers in school. Those adolescents who were not in school received the checklists by mail at their homes. The Child Behavior Checklists used for analyses were completed by 109 parents of 2-3 year old children; 943 parents of 4-16 year old children, and 545 non-referred adolescents from the general population. The rate of response was lowest for the youngest age group 47%, but increased to 62% with increasing age of the child. The response rate among the adolescents answering the Youth Self Report was 64%. Comparisons with the Child Behavior Checklists from this study are presented with Dutch, American, French, Canadian, German and Chilean samples and show striking similarities in four of these countries on the behaviour/emotional problems reported.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

A checklist to improve patient education in a cardiology outpatient setting.

A randomised controlled trial with process evaluation was conducted (n=103) to study the use and impact of a Frequently Asked Questions checklist as a means to prepare coronary outpatients for a regular visit to their cardiologist. It was hypothesised that use of the checklist would result in better patient-doctor communication, lower state anxiety and higher knowledge scores among patients, resulting in greater patient satisfaction. The patients in the experimental group (n=53) received the checklist, with written instructions in addition to a brochure from the Dutch Heart Foundation, at home to prepare for their visit. The control patients only received the brochure. State anxiety immediately before the visit was significantly lower among experimental patients. No significant differences in patient satisfaction or knowledge were found. Using the checklist did not result in longer patient-doctor consultations. Experimental patients regarded the checklist as a useful tool to prepare for their visits to the clinic. We conclude that the checklist may be a useful tool for cardiac patients to prepare for their visits to their cardiologist.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2001

Estimating health needs: the impact of a checklist of conditions and quality of life measurement on health information derived from community surveys.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence estimates of chronic disease vary according to the technique used. Questionnaire surveys may be susceptible to inaccuracies, which may be overcome by addition of a checklist of conditions. This paper presents SF-36 scores and NHS consultation rates for people reporting individual chronic diseases or disabilities in two questionnaire surveys, one of which employed a checklist and one of which did not. We aimed to document differences in estimates of disease prevalence, and to determine whether or not subjective impact on quality of life is the same in people recruited by a checklist as in those who volunteer that they have a chronic disease or disability without the prompt of a checklist. We use these data to estimate the contribution that different chronic diseases and disabilities make to the burden of disease in the community. METHODS: Data were collected in two postal questionnaire surveys conducted in 1991 and 1997 with response rates of 72 per cent and 64 per cent. Both questionnaires included a question on long-standing illness, disability or infirmity, together with the SF-36 health status measure. Respondents to the 1991 survey were asked to specify their illness in a free text response, whereas the 1997 survey offered a checklist of conditions. Prevalence rates of each condition were calculated, together with an 'escalation factor' representing the increase in reporting of specific diseases between the surveys. SF-36 domain and component summary scores were calculated overall and for the groups reporting individual chronic diseases or disabilities. Disease-specific NHS consultation rates were calculated for both surveys. RESULTS: The overall reported rate of chronic disease and disability increased from 28 per cent in 1991 to 42 per cent in 1997. Reported levels of mental health problems and of conditions with a perceived psychosomatic element increased substantially, whereas rates of well-defined conditions were similar. The pattern of SF-36 scores for those reporting chronic disease or disability was similar in the two surveys in spite of very different prevalence rates, and respondents reporting chronic disease had similar levels of health service use. This suggests that they were reporting conditions with similar levels of impact on quality of life. Heart disease, arthritis and mental health problems had the greatest impact on quality of life, and asthma and hypertension the least. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from SF-36 scores and NHS consultation rates suggests that addition of a checklist of conditions to this community health survey encouraged reporting of illnesses by the genuinely ill and not merely by those who are less severely affected by their disease. This method appears to give a more accurate reflection of health needs than information derived from routine data sources. The combination of prevalence data combined with subjective assessment of quality of life allows an alternative perspective of health needs. This approach highlights the relative importance of musculo-skeletal problems, particularly back pain, and mental health problems to the burden of disease, and the relative lack of importance of conditions such as asthma. It presents a contrast to studies based on other methods of health needs assessment.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

An evaluation of the revised seven-point checklist for the early diagnosis of cutaneous malignant melanoma.

The seven-point checklist has been widely advocated as a sensitive screening test for malignant melanoma. A number of groups have questioned the sensitivity of this system, especially in the detection of early lesions. We have assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the revised seven-point checklist when applied to lesions seen in our department over a 26-month period and compared it with the American ABCDE evaluation system. All melanomas (n = 65) were detected using the revised seven-point checklist and all were found to have at least one of the three major criteria defined by that system. Five (7.7%) melanomas were not picked up by the ABCDE checklist. Of 100 randomly selected patients who attended the clinic during the same period, with clinically diagnosed benign pigmented lesions, 63 had at least one major feature of the revised seven-point checklist. Forty (62%) of the melanomas, compared with only (4%) of the benign lesions, had more than one major feature. This study confirms the sensitivity of the revised seven-point checklist in the diagnosis of cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Dermatology↗
PubMed2004

Screening for psychiatric symptoms: PAS-ADD Checklist norms for adults with intellectual disabilities.

BACKGROUND: The Psychiatric Assessment Schedule for Adults with Developmental Disabilities Checklist (PAS-ADD Checklist) is a screening instrument designed to help carers recognize likely mental health problems in people with intellectual disabilities (ID). To date there are no published PAS-ADD Checklist data on a large nonpsychiatric population of adults with ID, an important step towards developing norms for comparative purposes. METHODS: Informants who had known participants for a median 24 months completed the PAS-ADD Checklist on 1155 adults with ID living in community, residential care and hospital settings in a county district in the North-east of England. RESULTS: Normative data were obtained for the PAS-ADD Checklist for the study population with reference to gender, age, and type of residence. The overall prevalence of mental health problems was 20.1%, and the rates for affective/neurotic, organic and psychotic disorders were 14%, 3.9%, and 10.2%, respectively. Significant differences in the rates for particular disorders were found across gender, age and, residence type. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of mental disorders found in the study population were consistent with previous studies of general populations of people with ID using over-inclusive screening instruments. The PAS-ADD Checklist appears to be an easy-to-use and sensitive tool for identifying mental health cases in ID populations, but further investigation is required concerning the specificity of the instrument.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

The mismeasure of coping by checklist.

Hundreds of studies have now used standardized checklists to assess respondents' self-reports of coping with naturally occurring stress. This article presents a critical review of the conceptual and methodological issues involved in the use of these checklists. As they are currently employed, conventional checklists render an incomplete and distorted portrait of coping. Specifically, these checklists are grounded in too narrow a conception of coping; the application and interpretation of checklists in the typical study are not faithful to a transactional model of stress and coping; statistical controls cannot eliminate the effects of key person and situation variables on coping; and no consistent interpretation can be assigned to coping scale scores. Researchers are encouraged to consider a broader range of methods for assessing coping, including semistructured interviews, customized checklists tailored to their specific hypotheses and objectives, daily diaries, and traditional trait measures.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed1985

Psychometric characteristics of the aberrant behavior checklist.

Information was presented on the psychometric characteristics of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Checklist appeared to be very good. Interrater reliability tended to vary across raters and subscales and ranged from mediocre to good but was generally in the moderate range and acceptable for research purposes. Validity was assessed by comparing Checklist scores for residents presenting with attributes thought to reflect varying degrees of social adaptation. Validity was also evaluated by comparing Aberrant Behavior Checklist scores with ratings on adaptive behavior scales and with objective observations of behavior. In general, validity was established for most Aberrant Behavior Checklist subscales. Preliminary data from drug investigations suggested that the Checklist may provide a useful adjunct for the assessment of psychotropic drug effects.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

A closer look at the Autism Behavior Checklist: discriminant validity and factor structure.

The psychometric properties of the Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC; Krug, Arick, & Almond, 1980a, 1980b), a 57-item screening checklist for autism was investigated. Professional Informants completed the ABC on 67 autistic and 56 mentally retarded and learning-disabled children. The autistic children were the total population of autistic children aged 6-15 in two circumscribed suburban and rural regions. Using the total score, the ABC accurately discriminated 91% of the children, with 87% of the autistic and 96% of the nonautistic group correctly classified. Moreover, the accuracy of classification was virtually identical when only the more heavily weighted checklist items were used. A 3-factor model accounted for 32% of the total variance in the checklist. Seventeen items loaded .4 or more on Factor 1, 12 items loaded on Factor 2, and 10 items loaded on Factor 3. The present results fail to provide empirical support for a single unidimensional scale for autism. Also, there is little support for subdividing the checklist into five subscales based on symptom areas.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Checklists for measuring response style in hypertensives.

The need for more clearly identifying the reporting behaviour of hypertensives was addressed. An objective method of measuring reporting behaviour was developed: the Life Concerns checklist. This checklist was able to discriminate subjects defined as introspective self-doubters from those who reported either psychosomatic disorders or who blamed the environment for their problems. This checklist was also able to verify that hypertensives do have lower report rates than normotensives. The Perception of Social Acceptability of Reporting Concerns Checklist (Persolac) measured the number of specific concerns perceived to be socially acceptable to report, of which there were less for males and which in all cases varied according to whom the concerns were to be disclosed. The two checklists are presented as adjuncts to other questionnaires for use in exploring the response of individuals with essential hypertension.

Adult↗