Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Chaperonins”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Chaperonin releases the substrate protein in a form with tendency to aggregate and ability to rebind to chaperonin.

To know whether the protein released from chaperonin GroEL/ES is in a form committed to the native state or still an aggregatable non-native one, two experiments were carried out. Dilution of the [GroEL-substrate protein] binary complex prior to ATP addition significantly improved the yield of folding, suggesting that the released protein has a tendency to aggregate. When N-ethylmaleimide treated GroEL, which can form the binary complex but not release the bound protein, was added to the binary complex prior to ATP addition, productive folding was severely inhibited, indicating that the protein released from GroEL/ES can bind to N-ethylmaleimide treated chaperonin. These data favor the 'reservoir' or 'reversion' model, in which GroEL/ES acts as a buffer of folding intermediate or mediates reversion of a misfolded protein to a less folded primitive form, rather than the 'marsupium' model in which folding of the substrate protein proceeds in chaperonin.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed2001

The effect of nucleotides and mitochondrial chaperonin 10 on the structure and chaperone activity of mitochondrial chaperonin 60.

Mitochondrial chaperonins are necessary for the folding of newly imported and stress-denatured mitochondrial proteins. The goal of this study was to investigate the structure and function of the mammalian mitochondrial chaperonin system. We present evidence that the 60 kDa chaperonin (mt-cpn60) exists in solution in dynamic equilibrium between monomers, heptameric single rings and double-ringed tetradecamers. In the presence of ATP and the 10 kDa cochaperonin (mt-cpn10), the formation of a double ring is favored. ADP at very high concentrations does not inhibit malate dehydrogenase refolding or ATP hydrolysis by mt-cpn60 in the presence of mt-cpn10. We propose that the cis (mt-cpn60)14.nucleotide.(mt-cpn10)7 complex is not a stable species and does not bind ADP effectively at its trans binding site.

Adenosine Diphosphate↗
PubMed2000

Refolding of target proteins from a "rigid" mutant chaperonin demonstrates a minimal mechanism of chaperonin binding and release.

One of the most interesting facets of GroEL-facilitated protein folding lies in the fact that the requirement for a successful folding reaction of a given protein target depends upon the refolding conditions used. In this report, we utilize a mutant of GroEL (GroEL T89W) whose domain movements have been drastically restricted, producing a chaperonin that is incapable of utilizing the conventional cyclic mechanism of chaperonin action. This mutant was, however, still capable of improving the refolding yield of lactate dehydrogenase in the absence of both GroES and ATP hydrolysis. A very rapid interconversion of conformations was detected in the mutant immediately after ATP binding, and this interconversion was inferred to form part of the target release mechanism in this mutant. The possibility exists that some target proteins, although dependent on GroEL for improved refolding yields, are capable of refolding successfully by utilizing only portions of the entire mechanism provided by the chaperonins.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed1995

Spinach chloroplast cpn21 co-chaperonin possesses two functional domains fused together in a toroidal structure and exhibits nucleotide-dependent binding to plastid chaperonin 60.

Chloroplasts contain a 21-kDa co-chaperonin polypeptide (cpn21) formed by two GroES-like domains fused together in tandem. Expression of a double-domain spinach cpn21 in Escherichia coli groES mutant strains supports growth of bacteriophages lambda and T5, and will also suppress a temperature-sensitive growth phenotype of a groES619 strain. Each domain of cpn21 expressed separately can function independently to support bacteriophage lambda growth, and the N-terminal domain will additionally suppress the temperature-sensitive growth phenotype. These results indicate that chloroplast cpn21 has two functional domains, either of which can interact with GroEL in vivo to facilitate bacteriophage morphogenesis. Purified spinach cpn21 has a ring-like toroidal structure and forms a stable complex with E. coli GroEL in the presence of ADP and is functionally interchangeable with bacterial GroES in the chaperonin-facilitated refolding of denatured ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase. Cpn21 also inhibits the ATPase activity of GroEL. Cpn21 binds with similar efficiency to both the alpha and beta subunits of spinach cpn60 in the presence of adenine nucleotides, with ATP being more effective than ADP. The tandemly fused domains of cpn21 evolved early and are present in a wide range of photosynthetic eukaryotes examined, indicating a high degree of conservation of this structure in chloroplasts.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed1993

Occurrence of chaperonin 60 and chaperonin 10 in primary and secondary bacterial symbionts of aphids: implications for the evolution of an endosymbiotic system in aphids.

All aphids harbor symbiotrophic prokaryotes ("primary symbionts") in a specialized-abdominal cell, the bacteriocyte. Chaperonin 60 (Cpn60, symbionin) and chaperonin 10 (Cpn10), which are high and low molecular weight heatshock proteins, were sought in tissues of more than 60 aphid species. The endosymbionts were compared immunologically and histologically. It was demonstrated that (1) there are two types of aphids in terms of the endosymbiotic system: some with only primary symbionts and others with, in addition, secondary symbionts; (2) the primary symbionts of various aphids are quite similar in morphology whereas the secondary symbionts vary; and (3) irrespective of the aphid species, Cpn60 is abundant in both the primary and secondary symbionts, while Cpn10 is abundant in the secondary symbionts but present in small amounts in the primary ones. Based on these results, we suggest that the primary symbionts have been derived from a prokaryote that was acquired by the common ancestor of aphids whereas the secondary symbionts have been acquired by various aphids independently after divergence of the aphid species. In addition, we point out the possibility that the prokaryotes under intracellular conditions have been subject to some common evolutionary pressures, and as a result, have come to resemble cell organelles.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Immunochemical localization of a region of chaperonin-60 important for productive interaction with chaperonin-10.

An IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb 54G8) which binds to both Bordetella pertussis chaperonin-60 (cpn60) and Escherichia coli cpn60 (GroEL) was produced. mAb 54G8 as well as Fab fragments prepared from this antibody were found to abolish the ability of chaperonin-10 (cpn10, GroES) to inhibit the ATPase activity of both B. pertussis cpn60 and E. coli cpn60. Electron microscopy was used to localize the binding site of the monoclonal antibody on the B. pertussis cpn60 molecule. In the absence of the antibody, the B. pertussis molecule exhibited the tetradecameric structure typical of cpn60. Both end views (showing 7-fold symmetry of the face of the molecule) and side views were evident. When mAb 54G8 was bound, B. pertussis cpn60 molecules appeared to be cross-linked so that they formed long chains. Only side views of the molecules were seen in these long chains. When B. pertussis cpn60 complexed with Fab fragments of mAb 54G8 was examined, chains were no longer observed. Instead, side views of B. pertussis cpn60 were often seen with Fab fragments extending from the ends of the molecule. These data indicate that mAb 54G8 appears to bind at or near the end of the B. pertussis cpn60 molecule and that binding of mAb 54G8 at this location affects the ability of cpn10 to productively interact with cpn60, most likely either by sterically blocking the binding of cpn10, by affecting the conformation of cpn60 in such a way that it no longer binds cpn10, or by inhibiting proper transduction of the effects of cpn10 binding.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed2002

Rhizobium leguminosarum chaperonin 60.3, but not chaperonin 60.1, induces cytokine production by human monocytes: activity is dependent on interaction with cell surface CD14.

As part of a program of work to understand the interaction of bacterial chaperonins with human leukocytes, we have examined 2 of the 3 chaperonin 60 (Cpn 60) gene products of the nonpathogenic plant symbiotic bacterium, Rhizobium leguminosarum, for their capacity to induce the production of pro- and antiinflammatory cytokines by human cells. Recombinant R. leguminosarum Cpn 60.1 and 60.3 proteins were added to human monocytes at a range of concentrations, and cytokine production was measured by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In spite of the fact that the 2 R. leguminosarum Cpn 60 proteins share 74.5% amino acid sequence identity, it was found that Cpn 60.3 induced the production of interleukin (IL)-1beta, tumor necrosis factor alpha, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-12, but not IL-4, interferon gamma, or GM-CSF (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor), whereas the Cpn 60.1 protein failed to demonstrate any cytokine-inducing activity. The use of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies showed that the cytokine-inducing activity of Cpn 60.3 was dependent on its interaction with CD14. This demonstrates that CD14 mediates not only lipopolysaccharide but also R. leguminosarum Cpn 60.3 cell signaling in human monocytes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1994

Alteration of the quaternary structure of cpn60 modulates chaperonin-assisted folding. Implications for the mechanism of chaperonin action.

Chaperonin-mediated, in vitro folding of rhodanese by the intact protein cpn60 has previously been shown to require cpn10 and ATP hydrolysis (Martin, J., Langer, T., Boteva, R., Schramel, A., Horwich, A. L., and Hartl, F.-U. (1991) Nature 352, 36-42; Mendoza, J. A., Rogers, E., Lorimer, G. H., and Horowitz, P. M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 13044-13049). The present work demonstrates that the rhodanese-cpn60 complex can be dissociated by urea to allow folding to proceed, thus removing the obligatory requirement for cpn10 and ATP. Analytical ultracentrifugation and circular dichroism show that tetradecameric cpn60 can be disassembled into monomers that retain substantial secondary structure. Unfolded rhodanese induces the reassembly of tetradecameric cpn60 from monomers, and binding of rhodanese stabilizes cpn60 quaternary structure. Intermediate cpn60 species, possibly heptamers, are detected at intermediate urea concentrations after addition of unfolded rhodanese. The use of urea has demonstrated a functionally related loosening of subunit interactions in cpn60 that is not detectable under usual solution conditions. Our data suggest a highly dynamic role for the quaternary structure of cpn60 in chaperonin-mediated protein folding.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed2000

Chaperonin-assisted folding of glutamine synthetase under nonpermissive conditions: off-pathway aggregation propensity does not determine the co-chaperonin requirement.

One of the proposed roles of the GroEL-GroES cavity is to provide an "infinite dilution" folding chamber where protein substrate can fold avoiding deleterious off-pathway aggregation. Support for this hypothesis has been strengthened by a number of studies that demonstrated a mandatory GroES requirement under nonpermissive solution conditions, i.e., the conditions where proteins cannot spontaneously fold. We have found that the refolding of glutamine synthetase (GS) does not follow this pattern. In the presence of natural osmolytes trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) or potassium glutamate, refolding GS monomers readily aggregate into very large inactive complexes and fail to reactivate even at low protein concentration. Surprisingly, under these "nonpermissive" folding conditions, GS can reactivate with GroEL and ATP alone and does not require the encapsulation by GroES. In contrast, the chaperonin dependent reactivation of GS under another nonpermissive condition of low Mg2+ (<2 mM MgCl2) shows an absolute requirement of GroES. High-performance liquid chromatography gel filtration analysis and irreversible misfolding kinetics show that a major species of the GS folding intermediates, generated under these "low Mg2+" conditions exist as long-lived metastable monomers that can be reactivated after a significantly delayed addition of the GroEL. Our results indicate that the GroES requirement for refolding of GS is not simply dictated by the aggregation propensity of this protein substrate. Our data also suggest that the GroEL-GroES encapsulated environment is not required under all nonpermissive folding conditions.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1999

Chaperonin-affected refolding of alpha-lactalbumin: effects of nucleotides and the co-chaperonin GroES.

We have studied how nucleotides (ADP, AMP-PNP, and ATP) and the co-chaperonin GroES influence the GroEL-affected refolding of apo-alpha-lactalbumin. The refolding reactions induced by stopped-flow pH jumps were monitored by alpha-lactalbumin tryptophan fluorescence. The simple single-exponential character of the free-refolding kinetics of the protein allowed us to quantitatively analyze the kinetic traces of the GroEL-affected refolding with the aid of computer simulations, and to obtain the best-fit parameters for binding between GroEL and the refolding intermediate of alpha-lactalbumin by the non-linear least-squares method. When GroES was absent, the interaction between GroEL and alpha-lactalbumin could be well represented by a "cooperative-binding" model in which GroEL has two binding sites for alpha-lactalbumin with the affinity of the second site being tenfold weaker than that of the first, so that there is negative cooperativity between the two sites. The affinity between GroEL and alpha-lactalbumin was significantly reduced when ATP was present, while ADP and AMP-PNP did not alter the affinity. A comparison of this result with those reported previously for other target proteins suggests a remarkable adjustability of the GroEL 14-mer with respect to the nucleotide-induced reduction of affinity. When GroES was present, ATP as well as ADP and AMP-PNP were effective in reducing the affinity between GroEL and the refolding intermediate of alpha-lactalbumin. The affinity at a saturating concentration of ADP or AMP-PNP was about ten times lower than with GroEL alone. The ADP concentration at which the acceleration of the GroEL/ES-affected refolding of alphaLA was observed, was higher than the concentration at which the nucleotide-induced formation of the GroEL/ES complex took place. These results indicate that GroEL/ES complex formation itself is not enough to reduce the affinity for alpha-lactalbumin, and that further binding of the nucleotide to the GroEL/ES complex is required to reduce the affinity.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Differential induction of the chaperonin GroEL and the Co-chaperonin GroES by heat, acid, and UV-irradiation in Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis.

Microsequencing of a polypeptide with MW of 14.5 and pI of 5.0 induced by heat treatment at 42 degrees C and 50 degrees C in Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis revealed that it corresponds to the co-chaperonin GroES. Quantitative analysis of analytical 2-D gels showed a relative induction of 12- and 11-fold after 30 min of heat adaptation at 42 degrees C and 50 degrees C, respectively. GroES is also induced by an acid shift from pH 7 to pH 5.5 and by UV254 nm-irradiation, with relative induction factors of 3.8 and 2.3, respectively. To our knowledge this is the first report showing induction of GroES by mild acid treatment. Contrasting to the relative induction of the groEL gene product, the second protein encoded by the groESL operon, GroES shows significantly higher induction under all stress situations.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1994

Identification of the major chromaffin granule-binding protein, chromobindin A, as the cytosolic chaperonin CCT (chaperonin containing TCP-1).

Chromobindin A is a multisubunit complex ATPase that binds to chromaffin granule membranes in a calcium-dependent manner and requires ATP for release from the membrane (Martin, W. H., and Creutz, C. E. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 2803-2810). Here we report that the seven previously characterized subunits of chromobindin A cross react with antisera specific to subunits of CCT, the chaperonin containing TCP-1 (Kubota, H., Hynes, G., Carne, A., Ashworth, A., and Willison, K. (1994) Curr. Biol. 4, 89-99). The chromobindin A subunits previously called chromobindins 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, and 19 cross-react specifically with subunits beta, delta, theta, alpha, zeta, xi, and gamma, respectively, of CCT. Additional similarities in subunit molecular weights, isoelectric points, and the morphologies of the two protein complexes as determined by electron microscopy support identification of chromobindin A as an adrenal medullary form of CCT. The chromobindin A/CCT complex was found to bind at least 7-fold more efficiently to affinity columns of chromaffin granule membranes than of adrenal medullary cytosol proteins, suggesting a specific interaction occurs between the complex and membrane components. The results indicate that the previously described characteristics of chromobindin A are likely to be relevant to the functions of CCT and suggest that the adrenal medullary form of CCT may play a role in the activities of secretory vesicle membranes.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Chaperonins facilitate the in vitro folding of monomeric mitochondrial rhodanese.

In vitro refolding of the monomeric mitochondrial enzyme, rhodanese (thiosulfate sulfurtransferase; EC 2.8.1.1) is facilitated by molecular chaperonins. The four components: two proteins from Escherichia coli, chaperonin 60 (groEL) and chaperonin 10 (groES), MgATP, and K+, are necessary for the in vitro folding of rhodanese. These were previously shown to be necessary for the in vitro folding of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase at temperatures in excess of 25 degrees C (Viitanen, P. V., Lubben, T. H., Reed, J., Goloubinoff, P., O'Keefe, D. P., and Lorimer, G. H. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 5665-5671). The labile folding intermediate, rhodanese-I, which rapidly aggregates at 37 degrees C in the absence of the chaperonins, can be stabilized by forming a binary complex with chaperonin 60. The discharge of the binary chaperonin 60-rhodanese-I complex, results in the formation of active rhodanese, and requires the presence of chaperonin 10. Optimal refolding is associated with a K(+)-dependent hydrolysis of ATP. At lower protein concentrations and 25 degrees C, where aggregation is reduced, a fraction of the rhodanese refolds to an active form in the absence of the chaperonins. This spontaneous refolding can be arrested by chaperonin 60. There is some refolding (approximately equal to 20%) when ATP is replaced by nonhydrolyzable analogs, but there is no refolding in the presence of ADP or AMP. ATP analogs may interfere with the interaction of rhodanese-I with the chaperonins. Nondenaturing detergents facilitate rhodanese refolding by interacting with exposed hydrophobic surfaces of folding intermediates and thereby prevent aggregation (Tandon, S., and Horowitz, P. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 15615-15618). The chaperonin proteins appear to play a similar role in as much as they can replace the detergents. Consistent with this view, chaperonin 60, but not chaperonin 10, binds 2-3 molecules of the hydrophobic fluorescent reporter, 1,1'-bi(4-anilino)naphthalene-S,5'-disulfonic acid, indicating the presence of hydrophobic surfaces on chaperonin 60. The number of bound probe molecules is reduced to 1-2 molecules when chaperonin 10 and MgATP are added. The results support a model in which chaperonins facilitate folding, at least in part, by interacting with partly folded intermediates, thus preventing the interactions of hydrophobic surfaces that lead to aggregation.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed2005

Folding behavior of chaperonin-mediated substrate protein.

Chaperonin-mediated protein folding is complex. There have been diverse results on folding behavior, and the chaperonin molecules have been investigated as enhancing or retarding the folding rate. To understand the diversity of chaperonin-mediated protein folding, we report a study based on simulations using a simplified Gō-type model. By considering effects of affinity between the substrate protein and the chaperonin wall and spatial confinement of the chaperonin cavity, we study the thermodynamics and kinetics of folding of an unfrustrated substrate protein encapsulated in a chaperonin cavity. The affinity makes the hydrophobic residues of the protein bind to the chaperonin wall, and a strong (or weak) affinity results in a large (or small) effect of binding. Compared with the folding in bulk, the folding in chaperonin cavity with different strengths of affinity shows two kinds of behaviors: one with less dependence on the affinity but more reliance on the spatial confinement effect and the other relying strongly on the affinity. It is found that the enhancement or retardation of the folding rate depends on the competition between the spatial confinement and the affinity due to the chaperonin cavity, and a strong affinity produces a slow folding while a weak affinity induces a fast folding. The crossover between two kinds of folding behaviors happens in the case that the favorable effect of confinement is balanced by the unfavorable effect of the affinity, and a critical affinity strength is roughly defined. By analyzing the contacts formed between the residues of the protein and the chaperonin wall and between the residues of the protein themselves, the role of the affinity in the folding processes is studied. The binding of the residues with the chaperonin wall reduces the formation of both native contacts and nonnative contact or mis-contacts, providing a loose structure for further folding after allosteric change of the chaperonin cavity. In addition, 15 single-site-mutated mutants are simulated in order to test the validity of our model and to investigate the importance of affinity. Inspiringly, our results of the folding rates have a good correlation with those obtained from experiments. The folding rates are inversely correlated with the strength of the binding interactions, i.e., the weaker the binding, the faster the folding. We also find that the inner hydrophobic residues have larger effects on the folding kinetics than those of the exterior hydrophobic residues. We suggest that, besides the confinement effect, the affinity acts as another important factor to affect the folding of the substrate proteins in chaperonin systems, providing an understanding of the folding mechanism of the molecular chaperonin systems.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1993

Chaperonin from Thermus thermophilus can protect several enzymes from irreversible heat denaturation by capturing denaturation intermediate.

Chaperonin isolated from Thermus thermophilus is stable up to 80 degrees C. Taking advantage of this heat stability, we have studied the effects of chaperonin on heat denaturation of several relatively heat labile enzymes. When the enzymes are incubated at their denaturating temperatures, the presence of T. thermophilus chaperonin in the solution has little effect on the rate of apparent inactivation of the enzyme. However, this inactivation is not irreversible since most activity is recovered when the solution is shifted to the second incubation at a moderate temperature with concomitant addition of MgATP. When the chaperonin is omitted from the solution, no recovery is observed. Recovery of the activity is also dependent on MgATP in the second incubation and 50% of recovery is attained at 5 microM MgATP. When the chaperonin is added after starting the incubation at a denaturing temperature, recovery of the activity becomes poorer as the delay of chaperonin addition increases. The critical temperature of the incubation at which irreversible denaturation occurs to the enzymes is elevated 8-15 degrees C by inclusion of T. thermophilus chaperonin in the solution. The heat stability of captured proteins by the chaperonin, assessed as retention of the ability to resume productive folding under optimal conditions, is measured more accurately using chemically produced folding intermediate-chaperonin complexes. The ability is lost at about 78 degrees C being irrespective of variable heat stability of individual enzymes. These results indicate that during heat denaturation proteins assume a common structure which is recognizable by the chaperonin. Once a protein with this structure is captured by T. thermophilus chaperonin, it retains the ability to resume productive folding even after exposure to the otherwise denaturing high temperature. Its heat stability seems to be limited solely by heat stability of chaperonin.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed1998

GroE chaperonin-assisted folding and assembly of dodecameric glutamine synthetase.

The folding and assembly of Escherichia coli dodecameric glutamine synthetase is facilitated by the E. coli GroE chaperonins, GroEL and GroES. Since endogenous glutamine synthetase monomers are bound to GroEL immediately after cell lysis and are assembly competent, this strongly suggests that glutamine synthetase is an authentic substrate of the GroE chaperonins. At physiological temperatures, the in vitro reactivation of glutamine synthetase increases from 10 to 70-80% of the original activity when the chaperonin GroEL is included. Although nucleotide binding is sufficient to dissociate assembly competent glutamine synthetase monomers from GroEL, the addition of GroES substantially accelerates the dissociation, assembly, and reactivation. The interactions of glutamine synthetase monomers with the activated chaperonin are transient (t1/2 = 10 sec) and these monomers can be released from GroEL at high concentrations without misfolding or inappropriate aggregation. It has been found that the nucleotide-induced conformational change of GroEL is critical for folding success of glutamine synthetase because the simple displacement of glutamine synthetase monomers from the GroEL chaperonin with another protein substrate inhibits reactivation. During glutamine synthetase refolding, the "high affinity" nucleotide-free GroEL is most efficient in preventing initial folding intermediates from partitioning to off-pathway folding routes. Interestingly, the more physiologically relevant "low affinity" nucleotide-bound ((ATP/ADP) GroEL--GroES) complex is not as efficient at capturing the initial folding intermediates of glutamine synthetase. In contrast to glutamine synthetase, non-authentic "model" substrates such as mammalian mitochondrial rhodanese and mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase show no differences in folding efficiencies with either the "low affinity" or "high affinity" complexes. Besides the nature of the chaperonin complex itself, the mechanism of GroE-assisted folding is determined by the folding environment and, most importantly, by initial interactions of chaperonins with folding intermediates. Glutamine synthetase interacts only transiently with chaperonin complexes, while most of the "model" proteins exhibit relatively long interactions times. It may be indicative of a specific evolutionary selected mechanism of chaperonin-assisted folding (optimizing the folding kinetics), different from that observed with non-authentic chaperonin substrates. Since the kinetics of protein folding depends heavily on the solution environment, studies involving in vivo chaperonin substrates under conditions that closely mimic those found in the cell will be required to define and solve the physiologically relevant kinetic mechanism of chaperonin-assisted folding.

Bacterial Proteins↗