Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Ceftibuten”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1988

Antimicrobial activity, spectrum, and recommendations for disk diffusion susceptibility testing of ceftibuten (7432-S; SCH 39720), a new orally administered cephalosporin.

The antimicrobial activity and spectrum of ceftibuten (7432-S; SCH 39720) was determined on a wide variety of bacterial species selected for resistance to oral and parenteral beta-lactam antimicrobial agents. Ceftibuten was found to be the most active beta-lactam tested against members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, inhibiting 81.6% of strains at less than or equal to 8.0 micrograms/ml compared with 75.0 and 54.8% of strains inhibited by cefixime and cefuroxime, respectively. All strains of Haemophilus influenzae (MIC for 90% of strains [MIC90], less than or equal to 0.06 microgram/ml), Branhamella catarrhalis (MIC90, 3.0 micrograms/ml), and pathogenic Neisseria spp. (MIC90, less than or equal to 0.06 and 0.019 microgram/ml) were susceptible to ceftibuten. Beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. (serogroups A, B, C, and G) were also inhibited by ceftibuten, but penicillin-resistant pneumococci were generally resistant to cefixime and ceftibuten. The activity and spectrum of ceftibuten seem most applicable to infections of the respiratory and urinary tract plus those infections caused by pathogenic Neisseria spp. Ceftibuten disks (30 micrograms) were evaluated and found to have an acceptable correlation (r = 0.88) with ceftibuten MICs. Preliminary zone size interpretive criteria for MIC breakpoints of less than or equal to 4.0 and less than or equal to 8.0 micrograms/ml were calculated.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Effects of fatty acid glycerol esters on intestinal absorptive and secretory transport of ceftibuten.

The effects of fatty acid glycerol esters and Tweens on the intestinal transport of ceftibuten were studied using a diffusion chamber system. The apparent permeation coefficient (P(app)) was used as an index of the mucosal permeability to ceftibuten. The P(app) markedly increased by the addition of hexaglycerol monostearate (HGMS) or hexaglycerol sesquistearate (HGSS) under an H+-gradient condition, while hexaglycerol tristearate (HGTS) and Tweens showed no effect on the absorptive ceftibuten permeability. These results are in agreement with those obtained in the previous study in the brush-border membrane vesicles. On the other hand, in the absence of an H+-gradient, the S-to-M transport of ceftibuten was proven to be significantly higher than the M-to-S one. In addition, either ATP-depletion of the mucosa or the addition of probenecid proved to enhance significantly the permeability of ceftibuten. These findings suggest the existence of an active secretory transport system for ceftibuten in the jejunal mucosa. To estimate potential effects of glycerol esters on efflux pumps as well as peptide transporters, the mucosal-to-serosal (M-to-S) and serosal-to-mucosal (S-to-M) permeability in the presence of the esters was further examined. HGMS, HGSS and HGTS markedly enhanced the M-to-S but not the S-to-M transport in the ATP-depleted jejunum without an H+-gradient, in which conditions contributions of both peptide transporter and efflux pump should be substantially small. HGMS and HGSS significantly enhanced the M-to-S ceftibuten transport in the ATP-depleted jejunum with an H+-gradient (p<0.01 vs. M-to-S transport without surfactant under the same conditions). Whereas, these glycerol esters were found hardly to affect the P(app) of the S-to-M transport. These results indicate that the enhanced intestinal transport of ceftibuten due to the glycerol esters may be based on their effects on peptide transporters but neither on efflux pumps nor on the passive permeation routes.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed1999

The penetration of ceftibuten into the respiratory tract.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the penetration of ceftibuten into various respiratory tissues and fluids. DESIGN: Single-dose, open-label, pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: Veterans Administration Medical Center. PATIENTS: Twelve hospitalized men aged 34 to 75 years with a variety of noninfectious pulmonary symptoms/diseases. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received a single oral dose of ceftibuten, 200 mg, prior to undergoing diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Plasma samples for the determination of ceftibuten concentrations were collected pretreatment and up to 12 h postdosing. Nasal secretions, tracheal secretions, BAL fluid, and lung tissue from a biopsy were obtained at bronchoscopy from 2 to 7 h postdosing. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Mean pharmacokinetic parameters for ceftibuten in plasma were the following: maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), 8.77 microg/mL; time to reach Cmax, 2.2 h; area under the plasma concentration-time curve extraploated to infinity, 49.21 microg/h/mL; and terminal elimination half-life, 3.17 h. These parameters were similar to those obtained in studies using healthy volunteers. Mean penetration of ceftibuten into nasal, tracheal, and bronchial secretions was 47%, 50%, and 30%, respectively. Mean penetration into BAL fluid was 81%, whereas penetration into lung tissue was 39%. No patient experienced any adverse effects related to ceftibuten. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftibuten penetrates well into various tissues and fluids of the upper and lower respiratory tracts. The results support the activity of ceftibuten in the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparative antimicrobial activity of ceftibuten against multiply-resistant microorganisms from Belgium.

To study the activity of ceftibuten, we obtained multiply-resistant isolates from approximately 20 hospitals in Belgium. Against Enterobacteriaceae, all of the tested comparative compounds were more active than cefaclor, and ceftibuten and tigemonam were the most active of the agents tested. Ceftibuten MIC50s were less than or equal to 1 microgram/ml for most enteric bacilli species and 85% of strains were susceptible (less than or equal to 8 micrograms/ml). This level of activity compared favorably to that recorded for cefaclor (less than or equal to 8 micrograms/ml), cefetamet (less than or equal to 4 micrograms/ml), and cefteram (less than or equal to 1 microgram/ml), that is, 37%, 69%, and 59%, respectively. Ceftibuten, cefetamet, cefteram, and tigemonam were highly active against isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. None of the comparative agents were as active as cefaclor against staphylococcal isolates. Against streptococci, cefteram was the most active, and tigemonam the least active of the agents. The MIC90s of ceftibuten for strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes were 2 micrograms/ml and 0.5 microgram/ml, respectively. Strains of Streptococcus agalactiae were resistant to both ceftibuten and tigemonam; cefaclor and cefteram inhibited 100% of isolates of this species. Strains of Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were consistently resistant to all of the compounds. Overall, ceftibuten exhibited potent activity against many multiply-resistant clinical isolates.

Bacteria↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Randomized comparative study of ceftibuten versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections.

In a randomized, single-blind trial, ceftibuten in doses of 200 mg and 300 mg administered b.i.d., was compared with cefaclor 500 mg t.i.d. in acute lower respiratory tract infections. A total 545 patients were enrolled, of which 263 were evaluable for efficacy. All patients were adults with a diagnosis of either bacterial pneumonia or bronchitis. The infective organism was eliminated in 83% of the patients in the ceftibuten 200-mg b.i.d. treatment group and in 85% of patients in the 300-mg b.i.d. treatment group. The organisms were eliminated in 79% of cefaclor-treated patients. Satisfactory clinical responses were obtained in 91% of patients in the ceftibuten 200-mg b.i.d. treatment group and in 92% of patients in the ceftibuten 300-mg b.i.d. group. Satisfactory clinical responses were obtained in 91% of cefaclor-treated patients. Predominant pathogens isolated were Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis, and strains of Enterobacteriaceae. Adverse experiences reported were similar for the ceftibuten and cefaclor treatment groups. Gastrointestinal side effects occurred in 6% of patients treated with ceftibuten 200 mg BID, 9% in those treated with 300 mg BID, and 7% of cefaclor-treated patients. Ceftibuten 200 and 300 mg twice daily was as effective as cefaclor bacteriologically and clinically in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Isomerization of ceftibuten in aqueous solution.

The isomerization reactions of ceftibuten and ceftibuten-related compounds in aqueous solution were investigated to estimate the substitution effect on the isomerization reaction and identify the three proximal dissociation constants of ceftibuten kinetically from the pH-rate profiles. The isomerization reaction of ceftibuten-related compounds was influenced by the substituents near the double bond at the C7-side chain, and the electron-withdrawing substituent was found to increase the isomerization rate. Ceftibuten isomerized at the C7-side chain, and the isomerization rate was influenced by the dissociation of the C7-side chain carboxylic acid and aminothiazole in the acidic pH region. The dissociation constants of ceftibuten were assigned by comparing the isomerization rates of ceftibuten with its related compounds at various pH conditions, and the pKas 2.3, 3.2, and 4.5 were attributed to the 4-carboxylic acid, 7-carboxylic acid, and 7-aminothiazole, respectively.

Ceftibuten↗
PubMed1989

Transport characteristics of ceftibuten, a new oral cephem, in rat intestinal brush-border membrane vesicles: relationship to oligopeptide and amino beta-lactam transport.

Ceftibuten undergoes H+-coupled uphill transport across rat small intestinal brush-border membrane vesicles. The effects of amino acids, peptides, folate, and beta-lactams on the uptake of ceftibuten were examined. Uptake of ceftibuten was competitively inhibited by dipeptides or tripeptides. A counter-transport effect on ceftibuten uptake was observed in the vesicle preloaded with these peptides, and the transport was temporarily against a concentration gradient (overshooting). On the other hand, ceftibuten uptake was not changed by amino acids and a tetrapeptide. Therefore, ceftibuten is predominantly transported via the oligopeptide transport system in the brush-border membranes. The relationship of ceftibuten transport to folate and other oral antibiotics was also investigated. Cyclacillin, cephradine, and cefadroxil exhibited both inhibitory and countertransport effects, but folate, cefaclor, and cephalexin showed only a slight inhibitory effect. As the transport of cefaclor showed no uphill uptake in the presence of a H+ gradient and its H+ stimulated uptake was small, a H+ gradient-independent carrier-mediated system seems to participate in its transport. These findings suggest that two different carrier-mediated transport systems, H+ gradient dependent and independent, may exist for oral cephems.

Amino Acids↗
PubMed1994

Characteristics of ceftibuten uptake into Caco-2 cells.

The characteristics of ceftibuten uptake into Caco-2 cells grown in a collagen-coated dish were examined. Ceftibuten showed stereoselective and pH-dependent uptake. The pH-dependency of ceftibuten was more marked than that of cefaclor or cephalexin, but all three antibiotics showed maximal uptake at pH 5.5. Ceftibuten uptake was linear for the initial 1 hr and then reached a plateau. The initial uptake (15 min) was markedly reduced by the addition of 2,4-dinitrophenol or FCCP (a protonophore), or by lowering the incubation temperature. The uptake of ceftibuten into the brush-border membrane vesicles prepared from cultured Caco-2 cells showed an overshoot in the presence of an H(+)-gradient. These findings indicated that the uptake of ceftibuten was energy-dependent, especially H(+)-gradient-dependent. Uptake inhibition by various compounds was compared using Caco-2 cells. Amino acids and a tetrapeptide did not inhibit uptake, whereas di- or tri-peptides were effective inhibitors. These observations suggest that ceftibuten is taken up by a carrier-mediated transport system(s) for dipeptides. Various antibiotics differed in their ability to inhibit uptake, with cyclacillin showing maximum inhibition. Differences in the inhibitory effect may be accounted for by the heterogeneity (multiplicity) of the transport systems.

2,4-Dinitrophenol↗
PubMed1991

Ceftibuten versus cefaclor for the treatment of bronchitis.

Ceftibuten is an oral third generation cephalosporin with potent antimicrobial activity against Enterobacteriaceae, beta-lactamase positive Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Neisseria meningitidis, Neisseria gonorrheae, penicillin-susceptible pneumococci, and beta-hemolytic streptococci. To study the efficacy and safety of ceftibuten for treatment of bronchitis, 58 patients were randomized to therapy with either ceftibuten 400 mg once a day or cefaclor 250 mg every 8 h at a ratio of two to one. Of 45 clinically evaluable patients, 28 (87.5%) of the 32 ceftibuten patients and 12 (92.3%) of the 13 cefaclor patients were clinically improved or cured. Of 33 microbiologically evaluable patients, 21 (87.5%) of the 24 ceftibuten patients and eight (80%) of the ten cefaclor patients were cured. Of 56 patients evaluable for adverse effects, three (7.9%) of the 38 ceftibuten patients and one (5.6%) of the 18 cefaclor patients had adverse reactions. In this small study, once-daily ceftibuten appeared as safe and as effective as cefaclor for the treatment of bronchitis.

Bacteria↗
PubMed1996

Efficacy of ceftibuten compared with amoxicillin for otitis media with effusion in infants and children.

OBJECTIVES: This trial compared the efficacy of ceftibuten with that of amoxicillin in resolving otitis media with effusion. METHODS: Two hundred ten children with otitis media with effusion were randomly assigned to receive either ceftibuten (9 mg/kg/day in one daily dose) or amoxicillin (40 mg/kg/day divided into 3 daily doses) for 14 days. Outcome was assessed at 2 and 4 weeks in all subjects; those without middle ear effusion at the 4-week visit were examined at 8, 12 and 16 weeks. Middle ear status was determined by pneumatic otoscopy and by an algorithm combining pneumatic otoscopy with tympanometry. RESULTS: The percentages of subjects who were effusion-free in the ceftibuten and amoxicillin groups at 2 weeks by otoscopy were 29.8 and 27.2%, respectively (P = 0.59), and by the algorithm, 23.4 and 20.4%, respectively (P = 0.47). In children who were effusion-free at 2 weeks, recurrence of effusion by 16 weeks was noted in approximately 60% of the ceftibuten group and 67% of the amoxicillin group. No medication side effects were reported by 88% of subjects in the ceftibuten group and by 93% of subjects in the amoxicillin group. We found no significant differences between the ceftibuten and amoxicillin groups with respect to resolution of middle ear effusion, rate of recurrence or side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Amoxicillin remains the drug of first choice for treatment of otitis media with effusion when treatment is deemed advisable, but ceftibuten may be an alternative drug in selected situations.

Amoxicillin↗
PubMed1993

Efficacy of ceftibuten for acute otitis media caused by Hemophilus influenzae: an animal study.

Ceftibuten is a new oral cephalosporin with an unusual stability to beta-lactamases that can hydrolyze other extended-spectrum cephalosporins. Using the chinchilla animal model, we compared the efficacy of ceftibuten (n = 33) with that of saline (n = 34), ampicillin (n = 32), and cefixime (n = 31) for the treatment of acute otitis media caused by beta-lactamase-producing nontypeable Hemophilus influenzae. Ceftibuten was superior to ampicillin regarding the time necessary to sterilize the middle ear (p < .001) and eliminate effusion (p < .001). The mean days of therapy required for bacteriologic cure were 2.57 for ceftibuten, 2.95 for cefixime, 7.95 for ampicillin, and 8.16 for saline. At the conclusion of therapy, chinchillas treated with ceftibuten had a significantly lower prevalence of positive cultures and middle ear effusion than did animals treated with ampicillin. No significant differences were observed between ceftibuten and cefixime. The results of this randomized, investigator-blinded experiment warrant further consideration of ceftibuten as a second-line agent for acute otitis media caused by ampicillin-resistant H influenzae.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1992

Microbiologic profile of ceftibuten, a new oral cephalosporin.

The bactericidal activity of ceftibuten, alone and in combination with other drugs, has been assessed in vitro. The ability to induce a post-antibiotic effect (PAE), the rate of emergence of spontaneous resistant mutants, and the presence of Eagle's phenomenon were also investigated. Ceftibuten rapidly killed most Enterobacteriaceae, Haemophilus, Moraxella and Streptococcus species tested, including beta-lactamase-producing strains with over 90% cfu reduction after only 2 h. Using chequerboard and time-kill tests, ceftibuten was found to react synergistically with aminoglycosides, and to give an indifferent response with ofloxacin against a large number of Gram-negative aerobes and streptococci. Antagonism was never observed. Ceftibuten induced a PAE of approximately 1 h on S. pneumoniae. As expected, no PAE was observed with Gram-negative species. Spontaneous emergence of ceftibuten-resistant strains exposed to supra-MICs of the drug was rare (< or = 10(-8)) in all pathogens tested. No marked Eagle effect was detected when bacteria were treated with ceftibuten at concentrations exceeding 100-fold their MICs. This rules out the possibility that in vivo the high concentrations of ceftibuten reached in the urinary tract may hinder its excellent bactericidal activity.

Bacteria↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Antibacterial activity of cefpodoxime in comparison with cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet, ceftibuten, loracarbef, cefprozil, BAY 3522, cefuroxime, cefaclor and cefadroxil.

The new oral cephalosporins cefpodoxime, cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet and ceftibuten demonstrate enhanced activity against Enterobacteriaceae susceptible to the established compounds as well (e.g. cefuroxime, cefaclor, cefadroxil). In addition, cefpodoxime, cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet and ceftibuten include in their spectrum species hitherto resistant to oral cephalosporins (Proteus vulgaris, Providencia spp., Yersinia enterocolitica). Besides, the majority of these compounds demonstrate relevant activity (MIC50 equal to or below 2 mg/l) against Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter freundii, Serratia spp. and Morganella morganii. Ceftibuten is the most potent oral cephalosporin against most of the Enterobacteriaceae. Non-fermentative bacilli (Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp.) remain completely resistant to oral cephalosporins (except some Acinetobacter species against cefdinir and Pseudomonas cepacia against ceftibuten). Antistaphylococcal activity for oral cephalosporins is highest for cefdinir followed by BAY 3522, cefprozil, cefuroxime and cefpodoxime. Loracarbef, cefaclor and cefadroxil are about equally active, while the other compounds are only weakly active (cefixime) or inactive (cefetamet, ceftibuten). Enterococci are insensitive to new generation oral cephalosporins as they have been to established compounds. The most active oral cephalosporins against hemolytic streptococci are cefdinir and cefprozil. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus milleri and Streptococcus mitior are most susceptible to cefpodoxime, cefdinir, cefuroxime and BAY 3522. Penicillin resistant pneumococci have to be regarded as resistant to all oral cephalosporins. Fastidious pathogens like Haemophilus spp., Moraxella catarrhalis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae are more susceptible to cefpodoxime, cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet and ceftibuten than to the other oral cephalosporins. The activity of oral cephalosporins is only weak against Listeria spp., Helicobacter pylori and anaerobic pathogens (except BAY 3522). Bordetella pertussis remains resistant to all absorbable cephalosporins. Progress in antibacterial activity of oral cephalosporins was mainly achieved by cefpodoxime, cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet and ceftibuten against Enterobacteriaceae and the fastidious pathogens and against staphylococci and the nonenterococcal streptococci by cefdinir, BAY 3522, cefprozil and cefpodoxime.

Bacteria↗
PubMed1988

Ceftibuten (7432-S, SCH 39720): comparative antimicrobial activity against 4735 clinical isolates, beta-lactamase stability and broth microdilution quality control guidelines.

The antimicrobial activity of ceftibuten, a new oral cephalosporin, was evaluated using 4735 clinical bacterial isolates processed at four medical centers. Ceftibuten inhibited nearly 92% of all Enterobacteriaceae (less than or equal to 8.0 micrograms/ml), thereby being markedly superior to cefixime which inhibited 78.7% at less than or equal to 1.0 microgram/ml and cefuroxime which inhibited 45.1% at less than or equal to 2.0 micrograms/ml. Pseudomonads and staphylococci were not within the spectrum of activity of ceftibuten. Ceftibuten was found to be very stable in the presence of five commonly occurring beta-lactamases of both the chromosomal-mediated (P99, K1) and plasmid-mediated (CARB-2, OXA-1, TEM-1) types. Only Type Ia (P99) beta-lactamase was significantly inhibited by ceftibuten. On the basis of results of a ceftibuten MIC quality control study conducted in five laboratories, a quality control range of 0.12 to 0.5 microgram/ml is recommended for the Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 strain.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2001

Ceftibuten stability to active-site serine and metallo-beta-lactamases.

Ceftibuten is an oral third-generation cephalosporin active against a wide range of bacteria and shows an improved stability to hydrolysis by several beta-lactamases because of the carboxyethilidine moiety at position 7 of the ss-acyl side chain. The kinetic interactions between ceftibuten and active-site serine and metallo-ss-lactamases were investigated. The activity of several TEM-derived extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESbetaLs) against ceftibuten, cefotaxime and ceftazidime was compared using K(m), K(cat) and K(cat)/K(m). Ceftibuten behaved as a poor substrate for class A and B beta-lactamases compared with cefotaxime. The chromosomal class C beta-lactamase from Enterobacter cloacae 908R gave a high K(cat) value (21 s(-1)), whereas there was poor activity with enzymes from Acinetobacter baumannii and Morganella morganii and ceftibuten. Ceftibuten resists hydrolysis in the presence of typical respiratory or urogenital-tract pathogens producing beta-lactamases.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed1999

Interpretation of middle ear fluid concentrations of antibiotics: comparison between ceftibuten, cefixime and azithromycin.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the potential influence of variables such as the cell content in the fluid, and serum levels, on the concentrations of ceftibuten, cefixime and azithromycin in the middle ear fluid of patients suffering from acute otitis media. METHODS: This randomized, open study compared the penetration of ceftibuten (9 mg kg(-1) 18 patients), cefixime (8 mg kg(-1), 16 patients) and azithromycin (10 mg kg(-1) 16 patients) into the intracellular and extracellular compartments of middle ear fluid of 50 paediatric patients (aged 8-14 years) with acute otitis media. Middle ear fluid was extracted by tympanocentesis 4, 12 and 24 h after dosing and divided into two fractions: with cells (as collected) (C+) and cell-free (C-). Antibiotics were assayed in C+ and C- samples by h.p.l.c. RESULTS: Ceftibuten achieved greater penetration into middle ear fluid than cefixime and azithromycin. Higher concentrations of ceftibuten (CTB) and cefixime (CFX) were found in the C- fraction (CTB: 4h 13.3+/-1.86; 12h 4.7+/-1.18; 24h 0.5+/-0.2. CFX: 4h 3.2+/-1.4; 12h 1.5+/-0.5; 24h>(0.1 mgl(-1)) than in the C+ fraction (CTB:4 h 8.4+/-4.3; 12 h 2.88+/-1.19; 24 h 0.3+/-0.27. CFX: 4 h 1.2+/-0.6; 12 h 0.8+/-0.2; 24 h>0.1 mg l(-1)) at the each time point, while the opposite was true for azithromycin (C-: 4 h 0.11+/-0.04; 12 h 0.12+/-0.08; 24 h 0.23+/-0.12. C+: 4 h 0.38+/-0.24; 12 h 0.9+/-0.03; 24 h 1.05+/-0.3 mg l(-1)). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the penetration of antibiotics into the middle ear fluid is influenced by its serum concentrations as well as by the cell content in the fluid. Ceftibuten achieved higher middle ear fluid concentrations than cefixime in C+ and C- fractions at all time points. Both ceftibuten and cefixime concentrations are negatively influenced by the cell content in the fluid. In contrast the concentration of azithromycin to the middle ear fluid is positively influenced by the cell content in the fluid.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1992

The efficacy and safety of once-daily ceftibuten compared with co-amoxiclav in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis.

The efficacy and safety of a once-daily oral regimen of 400 mg ceftibuten was compared with oral co-amoxiclav 500 mg three times daily in a multicentre, single-blind study. In patients with a bacteriologically confirmed infection, a successful clinical outcome was reported in 25 of 25 patients treated with ceftibuten and 10 of 10 patients treated with co-amoxiclav. In a further group of 88 patients, most of whom had been excluded from the primary efficacy evaluation because no pathogen was isolated pretreatment, overall successful clinical outcomes of 87% and 88% were reported for ceftibuten and co-amoxiclav, respectively. The duration of treatment and the time to resolution of the signs and symptoms of sinusitis were not significantly different in the two treatment groups. The incidence of adverse events was higher in the co-amoxiclav-treated patients (31% versus 15% in the ceftibuten group) as was the incidence of severe events (10% for co-amoxiclav-treated patients versus < 1% in the ceftibuten group). In summary, once-daily ceftibuten can be considered a safe and effective treatment for acute bacterial sinusitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1991

Pharmacokinetics of ceftibuten-cis and its trans metabolite in healthy volunteers and in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

The impact of renal insufficiency on the dispositions of 300 mg of orally administered ceftibuten-cis, a new broad-spectrum oral cephalosporin, and its primary metabolite ceftibuten-trans was characterized in 30 adult subjects. Subjects were divided into five groups of six subjects each on the basis of their 24-h ambulatory creatinine clearances (CLCR). The apparent total body clearance (CLP/F; where F is absolute bioavailability) and renal clearance of ceftibuten-cis were significantly lower in subjects with end-stage renal disease (on maintenance hemodialysis; group V) and in those with severe (CLCR, 5 to 29 ml/min; group IV) and moderate (CLCR, 30 to 49 ml/min; group III) renal insufficiency than in those with mild renal insufficiency (CLCR, 50 to 80 ml/min; group II) or normal renal function (CLCR, greater than 80 ml/min; group I). A significant correlation was observed between CLCR and ceftibuten-cis CLP/F. The mean apparent steady-state volume of distribution (V beta/F) of ceftibuten-cis ranged from 0.21 to 0.24 liter/kg in subjects in group I, II, III, and IV. V beta/F was significantly greater in the group V subjects with end-stage renal disease (V beta/F, 0.39 +/- 0.27 liters/kg). These changes in V beta/F cannot be separated from possible changes in bioavailability. The maximum concentration of ceftibuten-trans in plasma was significantly higher and occurred significantly later in group IV subjects than it did in subjects in the other groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗