Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cefdinir”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Efficacy, tolerability, and parent reported outcomes for cefdinir vs. high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate oral suspension for acute otitis media in young children.

OBJECTIVES: To compare efficacy, tolerability, and parental satisfaction of cefdinir and high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate oral suspensions given to young children with non-refractory acute otitis media (AOM) based on clinical endpoints and outcomes measures. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an investigator-blinded, multicenter study in which 318 children 6 months through 6 years of age with a clinical diagnosis of AOM were randomized to receive 10 days of either cefdinir (14 mg/kg divided BID) or high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate (90/6.4 mg/kg divided BID). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Investigators evaluated clinical response at an end-of-therapy (EOT) office visit conducted on day 12-15. Outcomes of satisfaction, tolerability, and adherence were also assessed at that visit using an Otitis Parent Questionnaire. RESULTS: The treatment groups were similar at baseline with respect to patient demographics. At the EOT visit, for cefdinir and amoxicillin/clavulanate, respectively, intent-to-treat (ITT) clinical cure rates were 82% (129/158) and 85% (134/158) (p = 0.547; 95% confidence interval [CI] -11.7 to 5.4) and per-protocol cure rates were 82% (123/150) and 90% (129/143) (p = 0.045; 95% CI -16.4 to 0.0). This difference was driven primarily by reduced cefdinir response in patients with recurrent AOM (p = 0.010) and those younger than 24 months (p = 0.039). Comparing cefdinir with amoxicillin/clavulanate, parents more often reported significantly better ease of use (89% vs. 57%; p < 0.0001), better taste (85% vs. 39%; p < 0.0001), and better adherence (at least 95% of doses) (82% vs. 61%; p < 0.0001). Diarrhea/loose stools were more common in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group than in the cefdinir group (28% vs. 18%, respectively; p = 0.0341). One patient in the cefdinir group and eight patients in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group withdrew from the study prematurely due to at least one adverse event (p = 0.0364). Study limitations included assessment of clinical recurrence by telephone call rather than office visit, exclusion of children with refractory AOM, and no assessment of middle ear microbiology. CONCLUSIONS: Among young children with non-refractory AOM, cefdinir was as efficacious as high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate in the ITT group, but somewhat less effective in per-protocol analysis. From the parental perspective, cefdinir was easier to administer, had a better taste, caused less diarrhea, and resulted in higher treatment adherence than high-dose amoxicillin clavulanate.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Cefdinir: an expanded-spectrum oral cephalosporin.

OBJECTIVE: To review the antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of cefdinir, an expanded-spectrum oral cephalosporin. DATA SOURCES: Literature was identified by a MEDLINE search (January 1983-November 1999) of the medical literature, review of English-language literature and bibliographies of these articles, and product information. STUDY SELECTION: Clinical efficacy data were selected from all published trials mentioning cefdinir. Additional information concerning in vitro susceptibility, safety, chemistry, and pharmacokinetic profile of cefdinir was also reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Cefdinir, an oral expanded-spectrum cephalosporin, has a broad spectrum of activity against many gram-negative and -positive aerobic organisms, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Cefdinir is stable to hydrolysis by many common beta-lactamases. Cefdinir is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and is primarily eliminated via renal clearance of unchanged drug. The terminal disposition half-life of cefdinir is approximately 1.5 hours. Efficacy has been demonstrated in a number of clinical trials in adults and children with upper and lower respiratory tract infections (e.g., pharyngitis, sinusitis, acute otitis media, acute bronchitis, acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, community-acquired pneumonia) and skin and skin-structure infections. The adverse event profile is similar to that of comparator agents. CONCLUSIONS: Cefdinir is a second-line alternative to first-line antimicrobial agents, with convenient once- or twice-daily dosing in the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections and skin and skin-structure infections. Similar to other oral expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, cefdinir has activity against common pathogens of the respiratory tract and skin and is stable in the presence of many beta-lactamases. The clinical choice of an oral expanded-spectrum cephalosporin will be based on patient acceptance, frequency of administration, and cost.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

[Comparative study on cefdinir and cefaclor in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate bacterial community acquired pneumonia].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefdinir in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate bacterial community acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: A prospective single-blind randomized controlled clinical study was performed comparing cefdinir with cefaclor in the treatment of sixty-four patients with CAP. The clinical and bacteriological efficacy and safety were compared between cefdinir and cefaclor in treating mild to moderate CAP. Thirty-three patients were treated with cefdinir 100 mg, orally, three times a day (cefdinir group), thirty-one patients were treated with cefaclor 500 mg, orally, three times a day (cefaclor group). In both groups 7-14 d was a treatment course. RESULTS: The cure rate of cefdinir and cefaclor was 84.8% and 77.4% respectively and the overall efficacy rate was 93.9% and 87.1% respectively. The bacterial positive rates and bacterial eradication rates of the two groups were 81.8%, 80.7% and 96.3%, 88%, respectively. The adverse drug reaction rate were 3% in cefdinir group and 6.5% in cefaclor group. There was no statistical significant difference between the two groups for the above results (P >0.05). The time of given medicine of cefdinir and cefaclor was (10.8 +/- 1.6) d and (12.1 +/- 1.7) d (P <0.01) respectively. CONCLUSION: cefdinir is safe and effective, shorten the course of treatment in the treatment of mild to moderate bacterial community acquired pneumonia.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Antibacterial activity of cefpodoxime in comparison with cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet, ceftibuten, loracarbef, cefprozil, BAY 3522, cefuroxime, cefaclor and cefadroxil.

The new oral cephalosporins cefpodoxime, cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet and ceftibuten demonstrate enhanced activity against Enterobacteriaceae susceptible to the established compounds as well (e.g. cefuroxime, cefaclor, cefadroxil). In addition, cefpodoxime, cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet and ceftibuten include in their spectrum species hitherto resistant to oral cephalosporins (Proteus vulgaris, Providencia spp., Yersinia enterocolitica). Besides, the majority of these compounds demonstrate relevant activity (MIC50 equal to or below 2 mg/l) against Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter freundii, Serratia spp. and Morganella morganii. Ceftibuten is the most potent oral cephalosporin against most of the Enterobacteriaceae. Non-fermentative bacilli (Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp.) remain completely resistant to oral cephalosporins (except some Acinetobacter species against cefdinir and Pseudomonas cepacia against ceftibuten). Antistaphylococcal activity for oral cephalosporins is highest for cefdinir followed by BAY 3522, cefprozil, cefuroxime and cefpodoxime. Loracarbef, cefaclor and cefadroxil are about equally active, while the other compounds are only weakly active (cefixime) or inactive (cefetamet, ceftibuten). Enterococci are insensitive to new generation oral cephalosporins as they have been to established compounds. The most active oral cephalosporins against hemolytic streptococci are cefdinir and cefprozil. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus milleri and Streptococcus mitior are most susceptible to cefpodoxime, cefdinir, cefuroxime and BAY 3522. Penicillin resistant pneumococci have to be regarded as resistant to all oral cephalosporins. Fastidious pathogens like Haemophilus spp., Moraxella catarrhalis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae are more susceptible to cefpodoxime, cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet and ceftibuten than to the other oral cephalosporins. The activity of oral cephalosporins is only weak against Listeria spp., Helicobacter pylori and anaerobic pathogens (except BAY 3522). Bordetella pertussis remains resistant to all absorbable cephalosporins. Progress in antibacterial activity of oral cephalosporins was mainly achieved by cefpodoxime, cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet and ceftibuten against Enterobacteriaceae and the fastidious pathogens and against staphylococci and the nonenterococcal streptococci by cefdinir, BAY 3522, cefprozil and cefpodoxime.

Bacteria↗
PubMedDate not supplied

In vitro activity evaluations of cefdinir (FK482, CI-983, and PD134393). A novel orally administered cephalosporin.

Cefdinir, a so-called third-generation oral cephalosporin was tested in vitro against over 700 pathogens from patients with bacteremia. Cefdinir was very active against the Enterobacteriaceae with a 50% minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC50) value range of less than or equal to 0.03-8 micrograms/ml. The enteric species having the highest MIC90S (greater than or equal to 16 micrograms/ml) were Citrobacter freundii, and the enterobacters, Morganella morganii, Proteus vulgaris, and Serratia marcescens. Cefdinir was generally two- to fourfold less active than cefixime, but markedly more potent with a wider spectrum compared with older oral cephalosporins, cefaclor or cefuroxime. In contrast to cefixime, cefdinir inhibited Staphylococcus aureus (MIC90, 1 micrograms/ml) and other staphylococci. Pneumococci, beta-hemolytic streptococci, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and pathogenic Neisseria spp. (MIC90S, 0.12-0.5 micrograms/ml) were cefdinir susceptible, but Pseudomonas aeruginosa, oxacillin-resistant staphylococci and Bacteroides fragilis gr. strains were resistant. Cefdinir was generally bactericidal with a minimal inoculum effect at 10(6) colony-forming units per spot. Cefdinir beta-lactamase hydrolysis by some recently described extended broad spectrum beta-lactamases was suspected. Cefdinir exhibited a wide, balanced spectrum for an oral cephalosporin indicating possible clinical use against susceptible pathogens in respiratory tract, urinary tract, genital and cutaneous infections.

Cefdinir↗
PubMed2004

Potency and spectrum reevaluation of cefdinir tested against pathogens causing skin and soft tissue infections: a sample of North American isolates.

Cefdinir is a widely used orally administered cephalosporin for community-acquired respiratory tract infections and skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). A total of 415 nonduplicate isolates of community-acquired SSTI (CA-SSTI) were collected from medical centers in North America and susceptibility tested against cefdinir and various compounds indicated for the treatment of CA-SSTI. The cefdinir MIC(50/90) in microg/mL/% susceptible for strains of the 7 principal CA-SSTI pathogens were: oxacillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (0.5/0.5/100%), oxacillin-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci (0.06/0.12/100%), group A streptococci (< or =0.03/< or =0.03/100%), group B streptococci (< or =0.03/0.06/100%), viridans group streptococci (0.25/2/88%), Klebsiella spp. (0.12/1/95%), and Escherichia coli (0.25/0.5/95%). Cefdinir was the most potent oral cephalosporin tested against staphylococci and the Enterobacteriaceae species, and 8-fold to 64-fold more potent than cephalexin against these pathogens. Beta-Hemolytic streptococci was highly susceptible to cefdinir (MIC(90), < or =0.03-0.06 microg/mL), while viridans group streptococci showed slightly elevated MIC results. Cephalexin MIC values for streptococcal strains (MIC(90), 1-32 microg/mL) were 32-fold to 64-fold higher than those of cefdinir or other oral cephalosporins evaluated. Only 0.5% of all 415 recent CA-SSTI pathogens were resistant to cefdinir (MIC, > or = 4 mg/L). Cefdinir showed a spectrum and potency comparable or superior to other orally administered beta-lactams (cephalexin).

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed1993

Impairment of cefdinir absorption by iron ion.

The effect of iron ion on the absorption of cefdinir, a new oral cephalosporin derivative, was evaluated in healthy male volunteers in a randomized three-way crossover study. The subjects received 200 mg cefdinir alone, 200 mg cefdinir and two tablets of iron ion concomitantly, and two tablets of iron ion preparation 3 hours after 200 mg cefdinir administration. The area under the concentration curve [AUC(0-12)] of cefdinir with concurrent iron was significantly smaller than that with cefdinir alone (mean +/- SD, 0.78 +/- 0.38 versus 10.3 +/- 1.35 micrograms.hr/ml). While there were no differences in AUC(0-3) between drug alone and drug with iron 3 hours later, the AUC(3-12) with delayed iron was significantly smaller than that of cefdinir alone (4.60 +/- 1.54 versus 8.03 +/- 1.72 micrograms.hr/ml). These findings suggest that the mechanism of interaction between cefdinir and iron ion preparation is the formation of a chelation complex and that this complex probably restricts gastrointestinal absorption.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Cefdinir (CI-983), a new oral amino-2-thiazolyl cephalosporin, inhibits human neutrophil myeloperoxidase in the extracellular medium but not the phagolysosome.

Cefdinir, a new oral 2-amino-5-thiazolyl cephalosporin, inhibited the luminol-amplified chemiluminescence (LACL) response of human neutrophils stimulated by PMA but not opsonized zymosan, in a concentration-dependent but not time-dependent manner. The LACL response to opsonized zymosan in cytochalasin B-treated neutrophils was, however, inhibited by cefdinir. Various cephalosporins, regardless of the presence of a 2-amino-5-thiazolyl moiety, did not significantly alter the neutrophil LACL response triggered by PMA and zymosan. The LACL response induced by the calcium ionophore A23187 and FMLP was also impaired by cefdinir, and this impairment was increased in cytochalasin B-treated neutrophils. Superoxide anion generation by neutrophils, measured in terms of lucigenin-amplified chemiluminescence and cytochrome c reduction, was not altered. Spontaneous and FMLP-induced neutrophil degranulation, assessed by lysozyme and beta-glucuronidase release, were not modified by cefdinir. Furthermore, cefdinir inhibited LACL generation in cell-free systems consisting of H2O2, NaI, and either horseradish peroxidase or a myeloperoxidase-containing neutrophil extract. Orthodianisidine oxidation in these two acellular systems was inhibited by cefdinir. Cefdinir did not alter neutrophil bacterial killing at concentrations that inhibited myeloperoxidase-containing neutrophil extract-dependent reactions induced by soluble stimuli. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that cefdinir directly inhibits the activity of myeloperoxidase-containing neutrophil extract released into the extracellular medium during neutrophil stimulation by soluble mediators, but has no effect on that released into the phagolysosome during phagocytosis. This unusual property of a member of the beta-lactam family could be of interest in modulating the exaggerated inflammatory process often associated with infectious diseases.

Blood Bactericidal Activity↗
PubMed2005

A pooled comparison of cefdinir and penicillin in the treatment of group a beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis.

OBJECTIVE: This pooled analysis compared the clinical cure and bacterial eradication rates achieved by cefdinir and penicillin in the treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharngotonsillitis. METHODS: Data from 4 multicenter, randomized, controlled, investigator-blinded trials, 2 in children receiving oral suspensions and 2 in adults receiving capsules/tablets, were pooled and analyzed in terms of clinical cure rates, microbiologic eradication rates, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 2751 patients were enrolled (age <13 years, n = 1274; age > or =13 years, n = 1477). Patients were randomized to receive cefdinir once daily (n = 569) or twice daily (n = 1086) for 5 or 10 days, or penicillin 4 times daily (n = 1096) for 10 days. Of the 2751 patients enrolled, 2198 were evaluable for clinical and microbiologic outcomes. Compared with the 10-day penicillin regimens, the cefdinir regimens for 5 or 10 days produced higher clinical cure and microbiologic eradication rates. Combined clinical cure rates were significantly higher for cefdinir compared with penicillin (94% vs 83%, respectively; P < 0.001). Combined microbiologic eradication rates were also significantly higher for cefdinir compared with penicillin (92% vs 77%; P < 0.001). Both cefdinir and penicillin were well tolerated, as >98% of patients completed the course of therapy. CONCLUSION: In this pooled analysis of data from 4 multicenter, randomized, controlled, investigator-blinded trials in children and adults, 5- and 10-day regimens of cefdinir achieved significantly higher clinical cure and microbiologic eradication rates compared with 10-day penicillin regimens in the treatment of GABHS pharyngotonsillitis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Cefdinir activity against contemporary North American isolates from community-acquired urinary tract infections.

Cefdinir is an oral cephalosporin approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1997 for the treatment of community-acquired (CA) respiratory tract and uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of cefdinir against recent clinical isolates collected from CA-urinary tract infections (UTIs), a possible expanded indication. A total of 456 isolates from CA-UTI were collected from medical centres in North America (NA; United States and Canada) in 2003 and susceptibility tested by NCCLS reference broth microdilution methods. Cefdinir and cefpodoxime were the most active compounds tested against Escherichia coli (98.7% susceptibility), followed by nitrofurantoin (97.0%) and ciprofloxacin (95.0%). Cefdinir was 8- to 16-fold more potent than cefuroxime axetil and cefprozil against E. coli, Klebsiella spp. and Staphylococcus saprophyticus. The activity of cefdinir was most similar to that of cefpodoxime against E. coli and Klebsiella spp., but cefpodoxime showed inferior activity against S. saprophyticus. The cefdinir spectrum was significant superior (+3.8 to 16.5%) to that of trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole against all pathogens evaluated. The cefdinir spectrum and potency were comparable or superior to other orally administered beta-lactams tested against recent (2003) clinical isolates from CA-UTI.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed2003

Contemporary evaluation of the in vitro activity and spectrum of cefdinir compared with other orally administered antimicrobials tested against common respiratory tract pathogens (2000-2002).

Cefdinir is an oral cephalosporin approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1997 for the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, pharyngitis-tonsillitis, community-acquired pneumonia, acute maxillary sinusitis, and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections in adults and adolescents, and acute otitis media, pharyngitis-tonsillitis, and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections in children. Although cefdinir showed similar activity to other cephalosporins in the early studies, very limited data has been generated over the last decade. In this report, we summarize the contemporary in vitro activity and spectrum of cefdinir in comparison to numerous other orally administrated antimicrobials available for treatment of community-acquired respiratory infections. A total of 8,326 non-duplicate recent clinical isolates, including Haemophilus influenzae (3,438), Moraxella catarrhalis (1,688), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (3,200), were collected from 35 medical centers in North America during 2000 through 2002, and susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution methods. Pneumococcal susceptibility patterns for beta-lactams and macrolides were also analyzed according to the year of isolation and the age group of the patients. Cefdinir had the greatest activity against H. influenzae among the cephalosporins tested with susceptibility rates of 97.1 to 99.0%. All of the agents tested had complete or near complete activity against M. catarrhalis. Against S. pneumoniae, cefdinir and other cephalosporins showed similar susceptibility patterns, but improved rates were observed in 2002 (78.5-79.4%) when compared to the previous monitored period (71.8-74.5%). This increase in susceptibility was mainly because of a declining the occurrence of high-level penicillin resistance (MIC >/=2 microg/ml) across all age groups. Macrolide resistance also decreased among S. pneumoniae in 2002 when compared to 2000 through 2001; however, resistance to levofloxacin continued to increase from 0.9% in 2000 to 1.4% in 2002. These results indicate a significant change in emerging beta-lactam resistance patterns (including cefdinir) with a decrease possibly influenced by greater pneumococcal vaccine use in children and the elderly. These rates of increased susceptibility could sustain and enhance the clinical activity of orally administered beta-lactams such as cefdinir.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

International study comparing cefdinir and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of three antibiotic regimens in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, multicentered, parallel-group study, patients received once-daily cefdinir 600 mg, twice-daily cefdinir 300 mg, or twice-daily cefuroxime axetil 250 mg for 10 days. Primary efficacy measures were microbiologic eradication rate, by pathogen and by patient, and clinical response rate, by patient. RESULTS: Of 1045 patients, 589 were evaluable for efficacy. At baseline, most patients had moderate or severe cough and sputum production as well as rhonchi, wheezing, and dyspnea. The microbiologic eradication rates by pathogen were 90% with once-daily cefdinir, 85% with twice-daily cefdinir, and 88% with twice-daily cefuroxime. The corresponding values for microbiologic eradication rate by patient were 90% (once-daily cefdinir), 85% (twice-daily cefdinir), and 86% (twice-daily cefuroxime). The respective clinical response rates by patient were 81%, 74%, and 80%. There were no significant differences in the incidence of drug-related adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events. Diarrhea was the most frequent complaint. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the efficacy and tolerability of cefdinir, once or twice daily, and cefuroxime were comparable with no significant differences between the regimens used.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Antistaphylococcal activity of cefdinir, a new oral third-generation cephalosporin, alone and in combination with other antibiotics, at supra- and sub-MIC levels.

Cefdinir is one of the few oral third generation cephalosporins that shows useful activity against nosocomial Gram-positive pathogens. For this reason the anti-staphylococcal potency of the new drug, alone or in combination with other drugs was further characterized. Against penicillin-resistant, oxacillin-susceptible Staphylococcus isolates, cefdinir demonstrated useful in-vitro activity. MIC90 values (in mg/L) were 0.25 for Staphylococcus aureus (30 strains), 0.06 for Staphylococcus epidermidis (24), 0.125 for Staphylococcus hominis (10), 0.5 for both Staphylococcus xylosus (15) and Staphylococcus capitis (11) and 4 for Staphylococcus saprophyticus (10), while Staphylococcus haemolyticus (12) was less susceptible with a MIC90 value of 32. Cefdinir activity was not adversely affected by several variables such as pH, inoculum size or the presence of serum or urine. The new cephem induced a PAE on all isolates studied: with S. aureus the extent of regrowth suppression ranged from 0.8 to 1 h, and with the other species from 0.5 (S. epidermidis) to 4.1 h (S. haemolyticus). Development of resistant strains was rare. At the highest level used (10 x MIC) mutants arose with a frequency of 6 x 10(-8) with S. haemolyticus and 2 x 10(-9) with S. epidermidis. The absence of a paradoxical effect of increasing concentrations of cefdinir on its bactericidal activity was confirmed up to a value of 500-fold the MICs. When cefdinir activity was assessed in association with ciprofloxacin, netilmicin, clarithromycin, fosfomycin, rifampicin, teicoplanin and vancomycin using the chequerboard and time-kill techniques, indifference predominated with all strains and in all combinations. Synergism was detected only in 11 out of a total of 175 tests performed by the chequerboard method. Using the time-kill technique cefdinir reacted synergically in 25 of 126 tests. Antagonism was never observed. S. aureus exposed to sub-inhibitory concentrations of cefdinir failed to grow on mannitol-salt agar and to produce haemolysins, but retained coagulase activity. Penicillinase production was also lost in about 17% of the survivors. Hydrophobicity changes were detected in all species tested with the exception of S. saprophyticus.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2005

Long-term effects on the nasopharyngeal flora of children following antimicrobial therapy of acute otitis media with cefdinir or amoxycillin-clavulanate.

The effect on the nasopharyngeal bacterial flora of 10 days of amoxycillin-clavulanate or cefdinir antimicrobial therapy was studied in 50 children with acute otitis media. Before therapy, 17 potential pathogens (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis) were isolated from the nasopharynx of 14 (56%) of those treated with amoxycillin-clavulanate, and 20 potential pathogens were recovered from 15 (60%) of those treated with cefdinir. Following therapy, at days 12-15, the number of potential pathogens was reduced to a similar extent with both therapies, to three in those treated with amoxycillin-clavulanate and two in those treated with cefdinir. However, the number of potential pathogens rebounded faster in those treated with amoxycillin-clavulanate as compared with cefdinir in the two subsequent specimens taken at days 30-35 and 60-65 (12 and 18 in the amoxycillin-clavulanate group, and six and nine in the cefdinir group, P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). Differences between the groups were also noted in the recovery of organisms with interfering capability. Immediately following amoxycillin-clavulanate therapy, the number of interfering organisms declined from 54 to 13, while following cefdinir treatment their number was reduced from 59 to 39 (P < 0.001). The differences between the two therapy groups persisted in the two later specimens taken at days 30-35 and 60-65 (25 and 38 in the amoxycillin-clavulanate group, and 52 and 51 in the cefdinir group, P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). This study illustrates the potential beneficial effect of using a narrow-spectrum antimicrobial that selectively spares the interfering organisms while eliminating pathogens. The benefit of such therapy is the prevention of reacquisition of pathogenic bacteria in the nasopharynx. In contrast, utilization of a broad-spectrum antimicrobial is associated with prolonged absence of inhibitory organisms and rapid recolonization with pathogens.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1996

In vitro activity of cefdinir against respiratory pathogens isolated in Sicily with reference to beta-lactamase production.

The in vitro activity of cefdinir (CI-983, FK-482), an orally absorbed aminothiazolyl cephalosporin, was evaluated against all 287 strains of Haemophilus influenzae, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes in comparison with cefaclor, cefuroxime, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, erythromycin and cotrimoxazole. The bactericidal activity of cefdinir, cotrimoxazole, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and erythromycin was determined against H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis and S. pneumoniae. With the exception of one beta-lactamase negative ampicillin-resistant strain of H. influenzae (resistant to all antibiotics tested), no resistance to cefdinir was observed (MIC < or = 1 mg/l). Cefdinir was active against H. influenzae, H. parainfluenzae and M. catarrhalis regardless of whether or not they produced beta-lactamase. In general, the inhibitory concentrations of cefdinir against H. influenzae, H. parainfluenzae and M. catarrhalis were similar to those of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, one or two dilutions lower than those of cefuroxime and four dilutions lower than those of cefaclor and cotrimoxazole. Against S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes cefdinir had the same activity as cefuroxime and amoxicillin but was more effective than the other antibiotics tested. Kinetic studies showed that cefdinir was rapidly bactericidal at concentrations 2 and 4 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC): a reduction of 99.9% in CFU values was generally observed after 6-8 h.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Effects of amoxicillin and cefdinir on nasopharyngeal bacterial flora.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of cefdinir (14 mg/kg per day) and amoxicillin (90 mg/kg per day) antimicrobial therapy on the nasopharyngeal flora of children with acute otitis media. DESIGN: Nasopharyngeal cultures for aerobic and facultative bacteria were obtained before therapy and 2 to 4 days after completion of therapy. SETTING: Outpatient clinic. PATIENTS: Fifty children, aged 7 months to 5 years 4 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: After completion of therapy, 22 (88%) of the 25 patients treated with cefdinir and 16 (64%) of the 25 patients treated with amoxicillin were considered clinically cured (P<.05). A significant reduction in the number of all isolates occurred following therapy in those treated with cefdinir (36 vs 71, P<.01) or with amoxicillin (56 vs 73, P<.05). However, the total number of isolates recovered after therapy was significantly lower in those treated with cefdinir (36) compared with those treated with amoxicillin (56) (P<.01). RESULTS: The recovery of potential pathogenic organisms (eg, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, beta-hemolytic streptococci, Haemophilus species, and Moraxella catarrhalis), as well as penicillin-resistant bacteria, was lower following completion of therapy in the cefdinir group (6 pathogens, including 5 that were penicillin resistant), compared with the amoxicillin group (27 pathogens, including 16 that were penicillin resistant) (P<.01). CONCLUSION: This study illustrates the greater ability of cefdinir compared with amoxicillin to reduce the number of potential nasopharyngeal pathogens as well as penicillin-resistant bacteria in children with acute otitis media.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Cefdinir: A comparative study of anhydrous vs. monohydrate form. Microstructure and tabletting behaviour.

Anhydrous cefdinir (AC) vs. monohydrated cefdinir (MHC) was compared in order to be used as antimicrobial in therapeutics. Different techniques have been used to characterize physically AC and MHC, and also a complete microstructural analysis of raw materials was carried out. Cefdinir and Maltodextrin QDM 500 (3:2) formulations were compressed in order to obtain tablets with typical dose of Cefdinir, i.e. 300 mg. Dissolution profiles were obtained for both AC and MHC tablets. Finally tablet X-ray diffraction was performed to ensure the stability of the monohydrated form after tabletting being clearly different in both AC and MHC crystals. AC crystal structure was agreed with the known pattern of anhydrous Cefdinir described in the literature. Microstructural analysis showed large differences in specific surface area (SSA), confirmed by mercury intrusion. Crystal structures of both AC and MHC were stable under mixing, compression and storing processes. Dissolution profiles were faster for hydrate form, probably related to microstructural properties of the crystal which remained after tabletting. In conclusion, it is possible to isolate Cefdinir in two forms anhydrous and monohydrate, well characterized and differentiated. The use of this later improves dissolution of tablet dosage form due to the lack of interconversion during tablet manufacture.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed1996

Distribution of cefdinir, a third generation cephalosporin antibiotic, in serum and pulmonary compartments.

The distribution of a new cephalosporin, cefdinir, in serum, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), bronchial mucosa and alveolar macrophages was studied in 17 adults following a single oral dose of 300 or 600 mg of cefdinir; tissue samples being obtained by diagnostic bronchoscopy approximately 4 h after this dose. Mucosal biopsies were taken, alveolar macrophages harvested by lavage, and ELF volume derived from urea concentrations in bronchial lavage fluid and blood. A microbiological assay for cefdinir was performed in serum, bronchial mucosa, ELF and alveolar macrophages. In patients taking 300 mg of cefdinir, the median concentrations of cefdinir were 2.00 mg/L (range 1.40-8.00) in serum, 0.78 mg/L (range 0-1.33) in bronchial mucosa, and 0.29 mg/L (range 0-4.73) in ELF. In patients taking 600 mg, the median concentrations were 4.20 mg/L (range 3.05-6.40) in serum, 1.14 mg/L (range 0-1.92) in bronchial mucosa, and 0.49 mg/L (range 0-0.59) in ELF. Cefdinir did not penetrate macrophages.

Administration, Oral↗